Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

2009-10 Rink Wrap: Eric Fehr

From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up Eric Fehr.


Eric Fehr

#16 / Right Wing / Washington Capitals

6-4

221

Sept 7, 1985

4

$771,750 cap hit in 2009-10; arbitration-eligible RFA this summer

5.67

5.36


2009-10GPGAP+/-PIMPPGPPAGWGSOGPCTATOI
Regular Season 69 21 18 39 18 24 3 3 3 145 14.5 12:07
Playoffs 7 3 1 4 2 4 0 0 0 20 15.0 11:24

Key Stat:  Six, the number of games Fehr missed because of injuries suffered in the 09-10 campaign.

Interesting Stat:  12:07, Fehr's average time on ice, 11th among Capitals forwards.

The Good:  2009-10 was a breakout year for Fehr, as the former first round draft pick broke the 20 goals plateau, set career highs in goals, assists, and points, and enjoyed the healthiest season of his NHL career.  But how good was Eric Fehr's 2009-10 season?  Consider the following: by scoring 1.50 goals per sixty minutes of 5-on-5 ice time, Fehr scored more often than every NHL forward other than Alex Ovechkin, Alexander Semin, Sidney Crosby, and Scottie Upshall.  Fehr was no slouch in the assist department either, finishing sixth on the Caps in total assists per minute of 5-on-5 time, and fourth on the team - behind Ovechkin, Semin, and Nicklas Backstrom - in points per sixty minutes.  Even more impressively, Fehr did it playing with the worst teammates of any non-fourth liner.

Of course, offense is only half the game.  Luckily for Fehr, he acquitted himself pretty well in the defensive end as well.  His 1.92 GAON/60 and 1.75 +-ON/60 are both solid, and above average, even on a team as talented as Washington.  Fehr also took fewer penalties per minute of 5-on-5 play than any other Capital forward, drew more than any forward not named 'Alex', had the best per-minute penalty differential of anyone on the team, and blocked his fair share of shots.  To top things off, Fehr only gave the puck away nine times in the 836:50 he played in the regular season and his 4.33 takeaway to giveaway ratio was 28% better than any other forward.

Finally, Fehr performed well this postseason, notching three goals and four points in his limited playing time, scoring goals at a higher rate than any of his teammates when it counted the most.

The Bad: The bad for Fehr primarily revolves around his special teams play.  For all of Fehr's 5-on-5 dominance, his powerplay numbers leave a lot to be desired; only Eric Belanger and Brendan Morrison scored less often in 5-on-4 situations, and only Morrison had fewer points per minute.  Part of that has to do with the opportunities Fehr was given (he skated less than 90 seconds on the powerplay per game, less than any other PP regular), but the production is still lower than you'd hope for given his 5-on-5 numbers.

As for playing a man down, well, Fehr didn't do much of it, and with good reason.  For all the things Fehr has going for him, skating ability ain't one and he simply lacks the speed, agility, and quickness to imagine he'd be an effective penalty killer.

Finally, it's worth nothing that while Fehr's 5-on-5 numbers are impressive, they were earned against some pretty weak competition.

The Vote: Rate Fehr below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best season that you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst season you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.

The Discussion: Has Fehr established himself as a legitimate top-six forward in the NHL?  Could Fehr be just (or nearly) as effective with bigger minutes against better competition, or is he just benefiting from riding the coattails of his elite teammates?  Where do you think Fehr fits in with the Caps next season - and where do you think he will fit in?  Finally, what would your offseason plans for Fehr be?

Poll
How do you rate Eric Fehr's 2009-10 season?
10
34 votes
9
118 votes
8
441 votes
7
352 votes
6
102 votes
5
25 votes
4
8 votes
3
2 votes
2
0 votes
1
5 votes

1087 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 118 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Japers' Rink

Saturday Caps Clips: Jetsetback

Mar 2012 by J.P. - 64 comments

Recap: Jets 3, Caps 2 (SO)

Feb 2012 by J.P. - 108 comments

Thursday Caps Clips: Hip Hip Hooray

Nov 2011 by EmilyB - 203 comments

Recap: Caps 4, Jets 3 (OT)

Nov 2011 by Becca H - 58 comments

Recap: Capitals 4, Coyotes 3

Nov 2011 by Rob Parker - 198 comments

Friday Caps Clips: Peg'd

Nov 2011 by EmilyB - 403 comments

Comments

Display:

No place to vote today?

by Yoshietree on May 13, 2010 11:03 AM EDT reply actions  

For the record…if I was able to vote…I would have given him a 7. His numbers thoroughly exceeded what I expected of him. To get a 10 he’ll need to put several more pucks in the net, cross the sixty-point plateau and put together better numbers on the PP.

As an aside…for the record I hadn’t drank the Fehr kool-aid coming into this season…and to be honest I’m still not entirely sold on him…but I certainly see more potential.

by Yoshietree on May 13, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

If I can’t vote for a Rink Wrap today, my day will be for naught!

"My face is my mask."

by Jake Shapiro on May 13, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ploy for page views and visits Technical issue. Will be resolved shortly.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 13, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Well, if there were a poll, I think I’d give a 7, maybe an 8. Oddly enough that is pretty much entirely for his even strength production. But also because of his health for the season. I think Fehr has showed he has the offensive ability to play a top 6 role. Depending on what the team does with Semin, Fehr will either be 2nd or 3rd line RW. Which I think means he’ll be the third line RW this coming season. I’d like to see him get more PP time next year, but I doubt that will happen.

I also wonder who he was on the ice for the PP with, with 2 obvious exceptions. That may be part of the reason for his lack of PP production. But if he was out there with Backstrom, Semin, etc, then there’s no excuse. I should probably ask Green, he was out there the whole time.

But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.

by Steckel Me Elmo on May 13, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

It would be a sin if anyone other than DMG wrapped Eric Fehr.

"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."

by Laich It Or Lump It on May 13, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

7

He exceeded my expectations, but his play last season indicated to me that he was on the verge of breaking out, so I wasn’t completely blown away.

For a 10, he’d have to get 30+ goals, 60+ points, and play some more time on special teams. Of course, that last part is partially out of his control.

"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."

by The Ghost of Bebop on May 13, 2010 11:17 AM EDT reply actions  

I guess it would be a 7 as well. We’ve been expecting Fehr to put up these types of numbers for a while. A 10 for next season would involve getting some 2nd line duty (tough to outright seize that spot considering he would need to dislodge Semin) and a fixture on the 2nd PP unit (assuming the Caps have one).

"Yes, but Rimmer Directive 271 states just as clearly, 'No chance you metal ba****d.'"

by apk3000 on May 13, 2010 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

It’d be somewhere between a 7 and a an 8. He was tremendous throughout the series against Montreal, even though it seemed like he was criminally underused and can never really get out of BB’s doghouse. Ultimatel, it’s probably a seven, since Fehr always seemed to have it in him (and maybe even more).

"In the depths of winter, I learned there was in me an invincible summer" ~Albert Camus

by Madelle on May 13, 2010 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

He was tremendous throughout the series against Montreal, even though it seemed like he was criminally underused

I’m not sure that’s the case in MON series…at least at ES…he was only 45 seconds a game less than Flash. I’m not saying that’s right or that it shouldn’t be reversed, but aside from Flash which winger to you take ice time from?

by Yoshietree on May 13, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

And that 45 seconds is compared to the ~2 minutes difference during the regular season.

by Yoshietree on May 13, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

But that also means he was playing less time in games 1-6 than the player that got benched in game 7. I would have liked to have seen BB send that message a little sooner. If not an outright benching, cut Flash’s ice and give some of it to the guys that were earning it (Fehr, Chimera).

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'd graph this, but i'm off to class

tomas fleischmann’s TOI this postseason

game 1: 16:21.
game 2: 15:18.
game 3: 15:14.
game 4: 13:37.
game 5: 7:26.
game 6: 12:11.
game 7: DNP.

tomas fleischmann’s TOI in the first round last postseason

game 1: 15:35.
game 2: 14:45.
game 3: 17:23.
game 4: 15:37.
game 5: 14:03.
game 6: 12:08.
game 7: 13:44.

tomas fleischmann’s TOI in the second round last postseason…

game 1: 16:29.
game 2: 14:21.
game 3: 14:37.
game 4: 11:20.
game 5: 9:16.
game 6: 14:41.
game 7: 16:29.

if you’re willing to throw out the fluky game 7 against the pens last year, i’m seeing a downward trend in all three series. now if only BB didn’t hit the reset button before game 1 each round.

related: why always 7 games, caps??

by Natty Bumppo on May 13, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

This just makes me more upset. He sees Flash not doing it for games 1-5 and then in 6 and 7 he gives him ice again. Finally he benched him this year, I hope that means the bloom is off the rose. If BB brings the same personnel management to the team next year I will be calling for his head. Of all the Caps that have lessons to learn upon reflection this off-season, BB by far has the most.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That’s kind of what I was trying to say with the “I’m not saying that’s right or that it shouldn’t be reversed”.

by Yoshietree on May 13, 2010 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

i really agree with the “BB’s doghouse” statement. He really seems to have one where he puts talented players (fehr and especially semin) because he is mad at them and gives them little opportunity to shine so they are stuck there and not nessecarily reaching full potential. This may just b me but i was really pissed he didnt put semin, backstrom, ovi 2gether. 2 games b4 the post season began the line was reunited and it was miraculous causing him to reunite them again the last game of the season, they weren’t too shabby then either. but then the post season began and the regular top line was reunited and well….we kno wat happened. If all our offensive weapons had been 2gether i think we would have had a better chance at winning (don’t get me wrong i luv knubs and he seems 2 work great with lars and ovi but he isnt wat semin is wen he is on) but instead bb went back to habit. and wen desperation struck he refused 2 reunite the line because of his frustration with semin and put backstorm down on the second line (wtf mate.)
also as mentioned bb seems 2 play favorites (flash, green) and that just makes it worse. they should b in the doghouse but theyre not and they get their opportunites 2 shine and in the playoffs at least fail (i’m not saying semin didnt fail…cuz he did but i dont think he was given his total opportunity 2 shine). This causes the whole team to suffer. coaching should b about putting ur best and most dependable players on the ice as much as possible and creating line combinations with chemistry and great scoring etc., not putting ur faves out thee as much as possible. it should b about winning and the team not ur personal preferences and stubborness…and this is coming from a really gdamn stubborn person….a histroy on both sides
Whoa that was tiring sorry had 2 get that off my chest

is it normal to have strange dreams of yourself meeting ur fave hockey players in sometimes life threatening situations?....I think no...crap

by frazyruskyluver28 on May 13, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

d’ohboy’s going to love this post.

by Natty Bumppo on May 13, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

yay some1s gunna luv me lol

is it normal to have strange dreams of yourself meeting ur fave hockey players in sometimes life threatening situations?....I think no...crap

by frazyruskyluver28 on May 13, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

ya well im lazy, its late, im a teenager who texts all the time, oh and it takes 2 long 2 write proper sentences spell corectly etc. since im lazy and have life/have 2 do things in the real world like put my real effort in 2 writing an english paper where i promise u its better than this.

is it normal to have strange dreams of yourself meeting ur fave hockey players in sometimes life threatening situations?....I think no...crap

by frazyruskyluver28 on May 14, 2010 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not much of an excuse, sorry. There most certainly are people on here who work harder than a school-age teenager and still type with almost perfect grammar. I guess I don’t mind the capitalization so much (as mobile commenters and others aren’t perfect with that either) but the abbreviations like “2” instead of “to(o)” are distracting. Plus, a comment that looks nice will have an inherent advantage over a comment that doesn’t.

Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink

by red army line on May 14, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

You just don’t understand how difficult things can be in the real world. High school is like, super hard.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

im really sorry this is off topic but its really bothering me
if u really think this is so important get off the hockey blog and go teach english. get the stick out of ur ass and read my opinion and comment on that not on my grammar.
and i get that the real world for the most part is harder than high school but most of the time people have a 9-5 day where they dont have 2 juice up on caffeine to work.
oh and LIKE i understand that ur LIKE job is really hard and all and ur so important but stfu (in case u dont kno that means shut the fuck up)

is it normal to have strange dreams of yourself meeting ur fave hockey players in sometimes life threatening situations?....I think no...crap

by frazyruskyluver28 on May 14, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your opinion is a hell of a lot easier to read when it’s not in one giant block of text filled with obnoxious text speak. The style of your argument affects the quality of your argument. If you want people to take you seriously you should return the respect by putting at least minimal time and effort into writing like a adult. If you are too busy for that then this probably isn’t the place you should be commenting.

But you are right, this is off topic.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Gee—I have to say that I’m in complete agreement with Yoshietree.

When I saw your long, abbreviated, and unpunctuated paragraphs, I didn’t read them. That is why you need to use proper sentence structure and punctuation. Your ideas may be good but unless you can convey them clearly in proper English then no one will read them. Your attempts at communication fall short.

Now I’m using my “z” key to a new message. Ciao.

by capsyoungguns on May 14, 2010 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

frazy, if you’re interested in sticking around and being a valued part of the community, i’d recommend checking out this fanpost from a few months back.

it’s clear you put some thought into your comment…but i’m just being totally honest here: hardly anyone read the whole thing. if you want people to read and respond intelligently to your ideas, the text speak isn’t the way to go.

by Natty Bumppo on May 14, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Semin? In Bruce’s doghouse? I don’t see that, and I sure as hell don’t see it to the extent I see it with Fehr.

by David Getz on May 14, 2010 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

he always calls out semin at press conferences, well not always but a lot more than fehr, and always seems to b frustrated w/ him. (im not saying bing frustrated with him is unreasonable tho…) and i viewed semin bing moved off the top line as a punishment.
And whenever semin does something well, like his hat trick in ottawa (a loosing effort) bb seems to undermine it. when asked about semin’s play he just shrugged, said something along the lines of that’s what he’s supposed to do and mayb even said he messed up in other parts of the game. Whereas, if green or flash did something like that I think he would b quick 2 praise them, even if it was a loosing effort.

is it normal to have strange dreams of yourself meeting ur fave hockey players in sometimes life threatening situations?....I think no...crap

by frazyruskyluver28 on May 14, 2010 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Leaning towards eight, if only because he started the offseason with both arms in slings, and also because his sense of timing with his goals was wicked good. His goals were very often game-changers, and on a team like the Caps, that was hard to pull off.

by EmilyB on May 13, 2010 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

8

Considering he basically couldn’t do any offseason work last year because of the shoulder surgeries, I wasn’t expecting him to crack 20, nor miss less than 10 games this year. I’d hope with a healthy summer he comes back with something bigger to prove, meaning Top 6 line time and breaking 30 goals.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 13, 2010 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Refresh and vote away, kids.

by Becca H on May 13, 2010 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m wavering between 7 and 8. I mean, I suspected he had this in him — the skill and adaptability seemed to be there — but I didn’t expect he could be quite so clutch with quite so little ice time.

by CapitalCentre on May 13, 2010 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

FEHR

8
hard to say with this dude…i was def not in the eric fehr fan club in the last few years…i thought he was a mediocre 15 goal guy who didn’t use his size appropriately…double shoulder surgery to career year whilst playing with less than inconsistent linemates…impressively above average considering circumstances, previous production, and expectation.

by KWclevpark on May 13, 2010 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

9

I was expecting another typical Eric Fehr season:

  • 10-15 goals
  • 25-30 points
  • 15 games missed due to injury
  • limited special teams time
  • solid and unspectacular defensive play

Instead, he exceeded the goals projection, points projection, injury projection by nice margins (and impressive percentages. He was probably 30-40% better than the solid player I thought he was. It was a great season. He was also strong in the playoffs, and against Montreal last year, he was one of the top players against them, mostly because he would draw the third pair on defense, and Bergeron isn’t someone who can handle a big guy like Fehr.

Is he a top 6 forward? I don’t know… probably not on the Caps. On some teams he would be. He is definitely a top 9 forward in the NHL though, and that’s not a bad thing to be.

To get to 10 next year, keep moving forward and progressing. 25-30 goals, 50+ points, stay healthy, and do more on the PP. He doesn’t have to be a PK forward (the Caps are already have a bunch of those, so no need.) Just keep moving forward, and Fehr will be fine.

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy

by MikeL-Pivonka on May 13, 2010 11:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Fehr hasn’t played long enough to have a “typical Fehr season” because of his injuries, so I don’t see how you can use that as a factor.

"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."

by The Ghost of Bebop on May 13, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

A typical Fehr season has many games lost due to injury, along with solid play while in there, and so-so, but not great scoring. 2009-10 was not a typical Fehr season in many aspects. He scored more goals (at a higher per game and per minute average) than usual and he missed fewer games.

All good things and more than I expected.

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy

by MikeL-Pivonka on May 13, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. I think we’ll have a better idea of a typical season for him when he plays another couple healthy seasons, though.

"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."

by The Ghost of Bebop on May 13, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

8 as well

I was very impressed with his work on both ends of the ice. The only problem I see for Fehr is breaking into the second line. As currently constructed the caps have to be:
1L – Ovie, Lars, Knuble
2L – Brooks, Belanger/B.Mo/replacement, Semin

Fehr’s no 2C so who’s spot would he take? Brooks? Knuble? Absent injury issues I just don’t see him moving up right now. Which is a shame because he deserves second line minutes.

A danger to myself and others on the ice

by can't skate on May 13, 2010 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I gave him a 7

Was tempted to go 8, because he’s one of my favorite players, but really he didn’t exceed my expectations all that much (if at all). The raw numbers (21-18-39) are in line with what I expected; The fact that he put up those numbers coming off of major injuries and in only 69 games with limited ice time is impressive though. A bit disappointed that he couldn’t ever find his way into the PP rotation.

The Discussion: Has Fehr established himself as a legitimate top-six forward in the NHL? Could Fehr be just (or nearly) as effective with bigger minutes against better competition, or is he just benefiting from riding the coattails of his elite teammates? Where do you think Fehr fits in with the Caps next season – and where do you think he will fit in? Finally, what would your offseason plans for Fehr be?

I think Fehr is a borderline top 6 talent on this team, but a solid top 6 overall. I think his per-60 productivity would drop with top 6 minutes, but he would still be a solid point producer. I could see him putting up 30-30-60 type numbers next season if given time on the top lines, even if he was still mostly a non-factor on the PP. Of course, he would need to play a (mostly) full season to put those kinds of numbers up, something he has never done. Ideally, I would like to see Fehr on the 2nd line RW with semin moving to LW, but I expect he will continue to be a 3rd line guy with some PP time and occasional promotions to the top 2 lines due to injuries. Fehr needs to be re-signed for multiple years this offseason; he fills a role (scoring RW) that is not particularly deep when looking to the future (semin and Knuble both UFAs after next season). He also needs to keep working on building up his strength and skating…something he all to often has not been able to focus on during the offseasons due to injuries. He needs to show that he can hold up over the long haul and play an entire season without injury (his 69 games this season were a career high).

by GusDaMan on May 13, 2010 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Agree with everything. I gave him an 8. 7 for slightly exceeding my expectations, and an extra point for stepping up in the playoffs.

He scored 3 goals in the playoffs and was only on the ice for 2 goals against. For those that remember my random updates during the season on Fehr’s G vs GA +/-, he kept it going in the postseason.

by psuscott1 on May 13, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I could write my own reply, but why bother? psuscott1 covered it. Food for thought/odd conspiracy theory: any chance McPhee and Boudreau are playing him sparingly to keep the cost down on his new contract? Fehr made something like 750k last season, right? That’s a steal for 21 goals, much less 30. I don’t think that’s true, but his minimal ice time doesn’t make any sense, either.

by RPI93 on May 13, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think there is anything that sinister going on. I think it’s just a matter of Fehr getting more ice time generally means Laich or Semin gets less ice time. He’s a victim of solid scoring depth on the wings. Which is the opposite of Flash, who had been getting a pretty big boost in ice time because of our lack of depth at center.

by psuscott1 on May 13, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

And on top of that, Fehr’s style of play makes him pretty effective on the third line as well, so I don’t think they were too upset to let him play there.

by psuscott1 on May 13, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent post, GDM. Agree with all points.

Aside from his penchant for scoring timely, clutch goals, IMO Eric is badly needed on this team as he is the only big body who consistently drives the net and converts — Ovechkin can, but doesn’t do it enough; Chimera drives, but misses.

7.

by cuqui on May 13, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eight. He did much better than I expected him to and what he was able to accomplish while having so little ice time is even more impressive.

I think next seasons success is dependent on the coaching staff as much as on Fehr. He’s done a lot to show he deserves more ice time but really hasn’t been able to secure it. Maybe his PP production is the final hurdle the coaching staff is expecting him to jump before he can secure more time? Who knows…

I look to the future because that's where I'm going to spend the rest of my life.

by zephyr on May 13, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

9

Went far above expectations performing in limited time, producing career numbers, and a number of clutch scoring moments. You’d think that warrants more ice time but the only thing i can reason is that BB doesn’t think Fehr is athletic enough for more. Fehr was one of my biggest surprises this year as I didn’t have much to think of on the 3rd line.

Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."

by breaklance on May 13, 2010 11:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Fehr’s a tricky one for me in that I am not surprised that he produced, even given the limited opportunities to do so. So do I grade him lower? It’s the flip-side of Flash, from whom I actually expected very little but got something (during the regular season and early on). Essentially, a guy like Fehr should have his doubters voting the big numbers and his believers voting lower numbers. Perverse.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 13, 2010 12:16 PM EDT reply actions  

9

It’s a goofy situation that you need to retcon your expectations for. I think his expectations were to get 20 goals again and people were likely hoping for more like 30 goals. I certainly was — big power forward on a team that desperately needed one

At least, that is my justification. There’s no way you can give Fehr anything lower than a 6 no matter what your expectations were. The only limitation he had this year was ice time. I had to say to hell with your rules and just give him an overall grade on the year since otherwise he’s a 5 since he only met my expectations. But…can you grade a guy getting bottom half level of ice time and putting up ridiculous points without much time on the PP? There’s no way.

For a 10 next year he has to replace Knuble as well as putting up 50 points as well as continuing his forechecking and pest growth. Apart from replacing Knuble, that might be hilariously low expectations for Fehr. He’s going to be the most interesting player next year in terms of growth, a lot of that stemming from how Boudreau chooses to use him.

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 13, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think his expectations were to get 20 goals again and people were likely hoping for more like 30 goals.

He has scored 0, 2, 1, and 12 goals in the past four seasons. What made you expect 30 goals out of him? Or even 20?

For a 10 next year he has to replace Knuble

Knuble is under contract next season. Why do you want to see him replaced, especially on the top line where he was dominant?

"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."

by Laich It Or Lump It on May 13, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I thought last year he had 15 or so, close enough to call it 20. Guess my expectations were sensationally high for him since the Caps lacked net presence which tended to bite them in the ass and Fehr is perfect for net presence. Turns out Knuble was that guy and Fehr is hopefully his understudy. I think he has more raw talent than Laich and should be able to jump over him straight to first line minutes provided Fehr doesn’t succumb to injuries.

As far as replacing Knuble, he isn’t going to be around forever. He’s at the tail end of his career and a replacement must be found. I’d love it more if Knuble is playing well but someone behind him is playing that much better. That’s my reasoning for wanting Fehr to replace Knuble.

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 13, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

My quandary exactly, at least regarding Flash.

I still found a way to give Fehr a high mark, or to justify giving Fehr a high mark, anyway.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 13, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh, 7.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 13, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

8
Essentially, a guy like Fehr should have his doubters voting the big numbers and his believers voting lower numbers. Perverse.

Hahaha. This is so true, and it’s kind of true to some degree in all of the voting under this system, which I like.

I gave him an 8 primarily because he seemed never to take offense or change his attitude because of his puny amount of ice time, his huge production considering the lack of PP and total ice time, and the fact that he stayed healthy.

This team

/NEEDSMOREFEHR

Hopefully BB pulls his head out of his arse next year.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 13, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

6

I have the same trouble. I fully expected 20 goals out of him given 15 minutes/game, but he exceeded what I would have expected given his limited minutes, so I bump it slightly. For a 10 next year, he needs to demonstrate he can hang with Ovie and Backstrom as a valid replacement for Knuble in the future, and find a way to pot 35 goals.

He has proven he can be a top-6 forward, and I would love to see him get top-6 minutes. The problem is he and Laich are sort of redundant, and you can’t really drop Semin to the third line. So how do you increase his minutes? More PP time perhaps? In the offseason, he should try to develop a slap shot, or something more effective long range.

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 13, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

7. probably would have been a 6 had he not had double shoulder surgery in the off season and probably couldnt wipe his own…shoes all summer. a lot has been expected of e fehr since he was drafted. most of that was due to when he was drafted, and to a large extent, who was drafted after him. scoring 50 goals back to back in juniors is no easy feat. however, like salary, his draft position is not something to hold against him…but it does come with high expectations.

fehr had a pretty good season for someone who desires to be a top 6 forward in the league. particularly impressive is his production based upon ice time. one thing that stands out is that fehr is the same size as ov (maybe a little lighter) but doesnt play nearly as physical as ov does….not too many players do. but fehr doesnt seem to use his size to any advantage. he doesnt bang on the forecheck and doesnt do well infront of the net. on a team that needs some more bangers, fehr would seem to fit the bill.

i think fehr can be a top 6 forward in the nhl…maybe not on the caps though. given good health, i’d like to see fehr get some opportunities on the second line, but what to do with sasha? seems like his lack of pk abilties is going to keep him from getting top 6 minutes. i would like to see him more involved in the PP, particularly if he can use his size to muck it up infront of the net. offseason recommendation? huntin’, fishin’, tweetin’ and doing radio shows. oh, and keep on getting stronger to stay injury free.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 13, 2010 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

7

I’m surprised Fehr stayed healthy enough to produce all year and I think he has it in him to be a top 6 forward, but as a third line winger he’s a lot for other teams to handle and despite average skating, he draws penalties. I think the CAPS are a better team overall if he is anchoring a third line that is getting it’s share of ice.

I think its interesting that Fehr got so little PP time and yet was on the ice and scored both of our extra skater / goalie pulled goals this year. Why did BB feel good about putting him out in those situations, but not in more regular game situations or the PP? He scored some big goals this year.

Lets hope BB gives him meaningful PP minutes next year. If he does, I can see him getting close to 30 goals.

by Direction 87 on May 13, 2010 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Why did BB feel good about putting him out in those situations, but not in more regular game situations or the PP?

Well you get 6 guys instead of 5, so that’ the easy answer. It’s also more likely that a coach will put two net-crashers on the ice for a final-minute-goalie-pulled push for a goal than a PP. On the PP you have more open ice and you want your skill guys out there to exploit it. In a 6-5 it’s much less open ice and you just want to get the puck to the net and bang home rebounds.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

5

What 5-on-5 dominance? DOMINANCE?

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.

by hotdog88gt on May 13, 2010 12:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Top five in goals score per minute. Excellent play all around.

Put it this way: if you had a team full of forwards who produced like Eric Fehr, you’d be a dominant team.

by David Getz on May 13, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

and as much as I hate how much it gets thrown around, Eric Fehr is clutch in big games. He does not disappear.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 13, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regarding Fehr’s PP stats, maybe If BB didn’t play AO for the entire time (and beyond) perhaps Eric could bump them numbers up.

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.

by hotdog88gt on May 13, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except AO plays the point, and Fehr would take the spot occupied by Knuble or Laich.

But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.

by Steckel Me Elmo on May 13, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

No. Compare GFON/60 vs GFOFF/60. Ovie is the biggest difference maker, even with him playing too much on PP. There are much better candidates to cut time from. And surprisingly Mike Green was pretty average this year – not that Fehr is going to play the point.

http://www.behindthenet.ca/2009/new_5_on_4.php?sort=22&section=goals&mingp=40&mintoi=1&team=WSH&pos=ALL

by six hole on May 13, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or just look at the rating

Forgot that they’d already done the subtraction of +/- on and off ice:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/2009/new_5_on_4.php?sort=7&section=goals&mingp=40&mintoi=1&team=WSH&pos=ALL

Ovie is behind only Gonchar for the entire league (both playing huge minutes) and Baxter is 5th.

by six hole on May 13, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

8 Days a week is not enough for me to say how much I loo-o-o-ove you.

Started him at 6 because I like him. Plus one for being healthier than I had expected, and plus one for the raw numbers of points he produced, which were a notch higher than I anticipated.

I’d expect him to get more second line time next year due to line juggling and injuries to Semin and/or Knuble, so we’ll see how he does against better competition.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 13, 2010 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

8

Wow, the first poll where I’m actually at the mode for somebody.

He and Flash have got to be the top-scoring third liners in the league. But 40% of Flash’s points are coming on the PP, and Fehr’s GAON/60 is a full goal lower than Flash at 5-on-5 (1.92 vs 2.92). I don’t know how there’s any question which one the Caps should be trying to keep.

He gets the 8 for meeting our high stat-geek “expectations” again (5th in GF/60) despite coming off double shoulder surgery. He gets a 10 next year if he’s still there with 16 minutes a game – either because Bruce has evened out the PP time or because Fehr is filling in admirably when Knuble or Semin go down with a significant injury (not that I’m rooting for that).

Also, for DMG, that’s Scottie Upshall who was 4th in GF/60, not Scott Hartnell. Just so we can wash away any hint of Flyers taint in the numbers.
http://www.behindthenet.ca/2009/new_5_on_5.php?sort=20&section=goals&mingp=40&mintoi=&team=ALL&pos=

by six hole on May 13, 2010 1:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Flyers taint

…exactly

by KWclevpark on May 13, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean, how useful could a stat be if a Flyer is 4th in it?

by six hole on May 13, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

In how many other blog comment sections do you find the correct use of “mode”?

by RPI93 on May 13, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

none other then the Rink

proud 4th line advocate

by iced on May 13, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean, Depeche Mode was kind of cool.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 13, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I like my pie a la mode.

by EmilyB on May 13, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I rated Fehr a 9. His surgeries in the offseason and his performance the past couple years gave me average expectations going into the season. I certainly did not foresee the breakout year he had. The offensive numbers he put up this season were unexpected, and in hindsight, it is most impressive given the ice time he received. Breaking the 20 goal mark by itself is enough to exceed my expectations for him, so that put me at a 7. What bumped me up to an 8 was continued improvement in his ability to grind and, most importantly, without re-injuring himself. Along with Chimera, I would rate him one of the best forecheckers on the team. He consistently puts in the effort to get turnovers, create chances, and draw penalties. What bumped me up to a 9 was his playoff performance. He was the only player to solve Halak in game six and he was the first to score on him in game two. Those had the potential to be some pretty important goals. But alas…

To get a 10 next season, Fehr would have to best this year’s goal total and improve his power play numbers. I would also like to see his earn top six minutes, which, I guess, is different than receiving top six minutes. I expect him to accept a qualifying offer with the Caps this summer (I hope so, at least). Assuming my CBA knowledge is up to date, a qualifying offer would have to be at least $ 810,337. That is a fair price for the services he brings to the team and a steal if he can reproduce this season. This season definitely helps his case in the event of arbitration. J.P. would have to come up with another zinger in the mock arbitration since he could not knock Fehr as being one-dimensional like Jurcina.

As an aside, I did a quick search of the archives for "Fehr love." Some articles I managed to dig up:

Corey, Vogs, Post, Dobber Hockey, FanHouse

Also, back in October, I commented on how I had been spending time on BtN, to which DMG replied:

Keep spending time on that site and you’ll wind up loving Fehr. He does incredibly well is almost any metric.

Fitting that he linked to BtN 11 times in this wrap :)

"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."

by Laich It Or Lump It on May 13, 2010 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

reading that Post article now. how cute, 4 wins in a row!

Washington went 4-0 for the week, including a 5-3 victory over visiting Philadelphia on Jan. 17 and beating Pittsburgh, 6-3, on the road Thursday.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 13, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

8.

I’m not at all concerned with Fehr’s powerplay stats. Normally BB throws him in for a few last seconds of the PP, after Alexes, Knuble, Backy etc are already tired, so that Fehr and Co. just do not have much time to set it up.

No signature needed. Just get me the Cup.

by fnralch on May 13, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Amen. Also normally the 2nd pp unit goes out there on the fly when the puck still needs to be rushed up the ice.

"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"

by MikeyGreen on May 13, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Voted 8

Fehr had one stat in 2008-2009 that hinted at his production this year: he was third on the time in goals per 60 minutes (behind Ovie and Semin).

That said, I didn’t expect much from Fehr, because I honestly thought his double shoulder surgery would hold him back from any kind of breakout (heck, I expected him to start the season on LTIR). Instead, he not only posts career highs in goals and assists, but also total shifts and TOI—1,010 (164 more than last season) and 836:50 (about 150 more minutes than last season).

The key for Fehr is staying healthy—he’s only played more than 60 games twice—69 this year, 61 last year. I know that people have been questioning his ATOI for a while now given his production, but given the way he was rushed back after his back issue was cleared up, I’m actually okay with his ATOI hovering a bit low right now.

What Fehr did this season was play himself back into the Caps’ possible plans. They obviously like him, but with Andrew Gordon’s breakout season in Hershey and other junior prospects like Eakin, Kuger, and (I hope) Broda turning pro, Fehr could have been easily expendable if he turned in a “normal” year of around 10 goals and 25 points.

What Fehr has to do next season is prove that he can be a real second/top line winger, by showing that he can maintain the same levels of durability, production, consistancy of play with more icetime. I honestly don’t believe that Semin will be around after next year and Knuble won’t be, and Fehr is unofficially the cheap but valuable back-up plan.

by Forsch31 on May 13, 2010 1:19 PM EDT reply actions  

8 – and the reason is simple. Prior to this year, I just hadn’t really noticed him as a player. Maybe due to injuries or limited ice time or whatever. I mean, I knew he was out there, but his on-ice actions didn’t really get my attention too often.

That all changed this year. He still doesn’t get much ice time, but he just seized every minute he was given and was clutch.

by SOIBF Caps on May 13, 2010 1:34 PM EDT reply actions  

7

The guy looked to me like he’d never be able to consistently perform because of a slew of injuries.

For a 10 next year, he’d have to be Mike Knuble’s replacement.

For a 5, he’d have to just maintain as the damn good energy/grind/checkingline winger.

For a 1, he’d have to spend the entire year injured.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 13, 2010 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Solid 7

Continues to improve. Pay the man, George…

Я смотрю на вас всех видеть, что любви не спит
в то время как моя гитара нежно плачет (Джордж Харрисон)

by stevie LL on May 13, 2010 1:36 PM EDT reply actions  

What, is Shirley busy?

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 13, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

She doesn’t have enough quarters in the till.

Я смотрю на вас всех видеть, что любви не спит
в то время как моя гитара нежно плачет (Джордж Харрисон)

by stevie LL on May 13, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can I say for the record that if I haven’t been rec’ing your work in these, I apologize and will respond accordingly.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 13, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

duly noted and recorded for all time.

by Natty Bumppo on May 13, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was leaning between a 7 or an 8 but I went 7. He’s another player that’s hard to separate the management from his grading; with more ice time I think he easily would have been an 8 and could have been a 9. Living in BB’s doghouse certainly hurt him, but like Alzner I don’t know how you can just give him points for that.

I think on any team that isn’t competing for a Presidents’ Trophy or leading goal-scoring team in the league Fehr is easily a “top 6” NHL forward. On the Caps he might not be “officially” a “top 6” but he’s certainly “top 9” and our third line is essentially another scoring line (especially on the wings) so I think it’s fair to say he’s made it. He would have been a top line wing on PIT, and even most other playoff teams you could find a spot for him in the “top 6.” There are maybe 3-4 teams in the league that are deep enough to push him to the third line, and we’re one of them.

I don’t know if Fehr’s rate-production would be the same if he got more ice, but I think he would continue to produce. I certainly don’t think his production would decrease at all. I also think he’s a great support player on a line because he can drive the net, win pucks in the corner, and really had a big breakout on the forecheck this season (probably what impressed me the most). Next year I think he should presumptively have a sweater every game and get PP2 ice (though behind Laich and Knuble it may be tough). Where will he fit in? BB’s doghouse. He’ll play second Fiddle to Flash again. Unfortunately, I could also see him get traded for a draft pick or something at the draft. Hopefully GMGM was watching the playoffs and doesn’t move Fehr, but I just don’t get the impression that he’s valued very highly by this organization.

For the off-season he just needs to work out like he’s trying to get on Jersey Shore, but maybe not so much on the glam muscles. Finally, he has a healthy back and two healthy shoulders, he needs to be working out his legs, core, and upper body all off-season and finally come to camp ready to take full advantage of that beast frame of his. I can’t say I’m not extremely excited to see what a healthy off-season does for him at this age. It would be a travesty to move him before seeing what a healthy Fehr can become; they’ve already invested several years in him becoming healthy, what’s one more?

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 2:23 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I sincerely hope you are incorrect in your belief about the CAPS evaluation of Fehr. Letting him go would be a mistake…he’s just hitting his stride.

by Direction 87 on May 13, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

8

He had a stellar year considering the amount of ice time he gets. On any other team, he’d be getting top 6 minutes at worst.

The best part is I KNOW he was more than capable of having this kind of a season, I just didn’t expect it to be this good.

Yet another benefit of the Knuble signing.

by TFG on May 13, 2010 2:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I am hoping that he doesn't want to come back to Washington and go somewhere he can play more....

……and he goes to Pittsburgh.

Maybe the Pens make him an offer that is higher than he deserves. If Washington doesn’t match, then the Pens may be getting a steal for a winger. If Washington does match, then it puts a crimp on their salary cap.

I was impressed with him this year and into the playoffs. I liked the effort he gave in his limited ice time.

What draft picks would the Pens have to give up for this?

(I just thought of this about 1 second ago, so there are probably a lot of factors that will ruin my idea that I hadn’t thought of.)

by Link_Gaetz on May 13, 2010 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You’d have to look at the RFA compensation sheet but for the Pens to make an offer the Caps can’t/wouldn’t match it would have to be an overpayment. Why don’t you focus your attention on Flash…

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I watched Flash play this year. He has some skills, but I would rather overpay to take a chance on Fehr than proper market value on Fleischmann

by Link_Gaetz on May 13, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure the second sentence I typed made no sense. Bottom line, I am not a Flash fan.

It’s all a crap shoot anyways. I have no idea what the Pens offseason plans are.

by Link_Gaetz on May 13, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

No your second sentence made perfect sense and I’m 100% with you. Come by tomorrow and you’ll get a sense about where I stand on Flash.

Either guy would be a top line wing for the Pens, but neither is the solution and I don’t think PIT can afford either. At some point Shero needs to pretend he cares about stocking the farm, and even if he can make the dollars work, giving away decent draft picks for Flash/Fehr is not a smart move.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

RFA Compensation info

here’s the important stuff:
$863,156 or less, None

$863,156 – $1,307,812, 3rd round pick

$1,307,812 – $2,615,625, 2nd round pick

$2,615,623 – $3,923,437, 1st and 3rd round pick

$3,923,437 – $5,231,249, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round pick

$5,231,249 – $6,539,062, Two 1st’s, one 2nd, one 3rd round pick

$6,539,062 or more, Four 1st round picks

how much is someone willing to pay Fehr, how high would the Caps go, and would said team even have the draft picks in their possession to pull it off?

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 13, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

oops, credit where credit is due. I pulled from nhlscap.com

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 13, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doubtful he gets anything above 2nd round pick compensation.

www.wiseadvertising.com

Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.

by Sombrero Guy on May 13, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would like to see the Pens offer him $2.6m. Keep it in 2nd round territory.

If the Pens get him, and he doesn’t pan out, they will have to try someone else. They have a terrible track record with 2nd rounders anyways.

If the Caps match, that $2.6m against the Caps…umm…cap for a player that doesn’t play a whole lot doesn’t look very good.

by Link_Gaetz on May 13, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

For Fehr or Flash? 2.6 is probably a huge overpayment on either and I think GMGM would take it. But that means you have another year of no 2nd round pick and it also takes away Shero’s best deadline bargaining chip (if this year is any indication).

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

$2.6M? That’s about a quarter of the Pens’ cap space. I can’t see Shero allocating that much dough to one winger, not when they need 3 defense and two more wingers.

And it’s way too much for either Fehr or Flash.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 13, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

2.6 is Brooks Laich money. And I love Fehr, but he’s not at that level (yet)

someone is welcome to be misguided enough to throw that sort of money at Flash, though.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 13, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d say you’d need to give a 3rd to get Fehr, and a 2nd to get Flash. Below those thresholds I don’t see how GMGM doesn’t match. Certainly neither will get away for under 863K.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Troof. On all points. I was just kind of throwing it out there.

Also, it opens the Pens up to a retaliatory offer sheet, since it appears to be an unwritten rule amongst GMs to not do that.

by Link_Gaetz on May 13, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah the Pens are open to a retaliatory offer sheet… just as soon as they have a guy worth offering.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 13, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d love to see Flash moved at the draft, Semin switch back to LW and Fehr given legit second line ice time.

www.wiseadvertising.com

Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.

by Sombrero Guy on May 13, 2010 3:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Fehr fancies himself a LW, though, so the Semin switch isn’t necessary.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 13, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man, that would be nice. Some package of Flash and prospects for a 2C, get Fehr bumped up a line, and a third line featuring Chimera, MP and another gritty fast guy.

Winnah!

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 13, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, I mentioned the same above. Well, not the part about flash, but it was implied (in my head, at least).

by GusDaMan on May 13, 2010 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

7

Split between I expected this and I don’t think he going to get the chance.

never let the truth get in the way of a good story

by toymechanic on May 13, 2010 4:12 PM EDT reply actions  

8

He honestly had the best season possible with the minutes he got but he can do more in the future. If plays 20 minutes a game I think he can crack 35-40 goals.

by cobracg on May 13, 2010 4:42 PM EDT reply actions  

7

Arguably the best forward we had rolling in the second season, Fehr does all the little things that are necessary to win and frankly, if we had more ‘slow,’ ‘dirty goal’ types, we’d be better off in the long term. I can’t think of a better mentor for him than Grandpa Slippers.

Sign this man to a digestible 3 year deal (2-2.5M) and let’s hope for a 10 next year: 75+ games and 25+ goals from within 2 feet of the net.

99 problems and a coach ain't one.

by bigonetimer on May 13, 2010 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

8

I was in between 7 and 8 but I pushed it to an 8 for the simple fact that I wasn’t expecting him to be so healthy this year. I never really looked at it as if he could be healthy almost, and in not doing so I pretty much wasn’t expecting this much production from him…especially in such limited ice time. Great breakout season and truth be told, I don’t mind the question of whether he’s “top 6” but playing on our 3rd scoring line. That’s part of our depth. I think he could produce more on the 2nd line, although obviously the efficiency would suffer some with more minutes. If we only had real, solid 2C and 3C we could roll out 3 scary lines with ease.

I’d expect Fehr to play on the 3rd line again next year, but I’d like to see it settle in and build some chemistry. I’d love to see him with Chimera again and could see Belanger or MP centering them. Fehr is never going to be a speedster but he wouldn’t have to be with Chimera…he just needs to improve defensively, and get even better at puck possession on the boards and finding his way to the front of the net. Solid “piece” to the puzzle that produces good offense for us.

Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.

by Davethecapsfan on May 13, 2010 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

8

I always liked Fehr and had faith he’d be a late bloomer once he got over his injuries. But coming off double shoulder surgery I definitely didn’t expect this many goals, points or games played. It’s an extra plus that he did it while in the doghouse and showed up for the playoffs. He was also awesome on the forecheck all year, pinning teams in their zone and creating turnovers and chances. Chimera, Bradley, Steckel et al couldn’t finish, but I think Fehr would fit in real well if his forechecking was creating chances for Semin, AO and Baxter.

Next year I would like to see him fighting with Laich for the other 2W spot, but he probably won’t because BB likes to rock the ginger. Long term I see him as a replacement for Knuble, and I am actually cautiously optimistic that the organization does too. I think just about the only thing I liked about BB’s moves in the playoffs was how he routinely had Fehr come on for an early change at the end of a shift by the top line. Knuble would be out of gas and AO and Baxter would keep going and Fehr would come out with fresh legs. It was encouraging.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 13, 2010 10:28 PM EDT reply actions  

9

So many reasons kept him from truly exceeding expectations. Flash, Boudreau, Semin, Knuble, the 1st PP Team and completely fumbling SO opportunities.

Unfortunately, he may not crack the top 6 unless Flash is gone and Semin or Fehr decide they want to play LW.

If Fehr gets 15ATOI and little more PP time, 30G 30A are what I would expect next season in 75+ games. To get a 10, 35G 35A and 17ATOI.

4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...

by JSchon on May 14, 2010 6:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Fehr will be a top 6 RW when 2011-2012 comes along. It will be difficult for Knuble to play 1st line minutes when he’s 40 years old. Don’t get me wrong. I think Knuble is a great addition to our team and cheered that acquisition but know he can’t produce at that level forever.

If it were up to me (and I know it’s not), our two top RW’ers in 2011-2012 would be: Fehr and Semin. (Yes, I know it depends on if they want to stay here and if they get the contracts.)

Gee, nothing like my favorite non-Ovi Caps being the ones to fight each other out for minutes. (What else is new? And I liked the late great Chris Clark and was sad when his productivity declined so precipitously due to injuries.)

Rocking the Red since 1975

by CapsFan75 on May 15, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators