Tuesday Roundup - Gameday: Caps @ Bruins
[AP Preview - WashingtonCaps.com Preview]
And... exhale. We made it.
And what better way to start the final seventeen forty-firsts of the season (second half, too those of you who are comfortable with rounding a bit) than with a battle between the Eastern Conference's top two teams in a rematch of one of the season's most entertaining games, played just two Saturdays ago?
Then:
Now:
The gap is narrowing, baby! At this rate, the Caps will pass the B's with three games left in the regular season to claim the Eastern crown (and wouldn't that be dramatic?). Anyway, they'll go a long way towards that goal - and, perhaps more importantly, the goal of getting back to .500 on the road for the first time since mid-October - with a win tonight.
In a game like this, however, two points might be only slightly more important than a strong effort, something the Caps haven't been able to generate with any consistency on the road against lottery-bound teams and other non-playoff competition, much less against the beasts of the East - the Caps' last win away from the Verizon Center against a team currently in either conference's top eight was in Buffalo way back on December 30. Granted, they've only had one such opportunity since then (at Montreal), but now would be a good time for this team to start flexing a little muscle on the road - no team in the top ten in the Eastern Conference has fewer points on the road than the Caps, and no team in the Conference has played more road games.
Then again, the Caps are 6-3-0 in their last nine away from home, including wins at Montreal, Buffalo, the Rangers, and Pittsburgh, so there's that rosy spin to take the edge off of last week's back-to-back stinkers on the Isle and in Ottawa. In fact, since I told you not to worry about the Caps' road record, they've gone 2-2-0. See? .500 - no worries.
We all know the talent is there. And they're as healthy as they've been in what seems like ages. But with nearly a week off - much of it spent away from hockey for many of the players - one wonders if the team might be a little rusty, to say nothing of the persistent focus issues they've shown on the road.
Elsewhere 'Round the Rinks:
Scott Burnside suggests that the Caps could use Tomas Kaberle. I, in turn, suggest that the Leafs could use Michael Nylander. Trade rumor!... Some fresh power rankings are out, with the Caps up three to fourth at Sportsnet.ca, holding at fourth at CBSSports.com and SportingNews.com, down two to sixth at The Hockey News, holding in third at ESPN.com, and down one to sixth at TSN.ca.... Down on the farm, Keith Aucoin is waiting patiently for another shot in the NHL and Chris Bourque puckers up to Gary Bettman (and C-Bo joined AO with All-Star Game GWGs this week).... Another level down, Keith Seabrook has been named WHL Player of the Week.... Today's Cap of the Day is a former Bruin as well.... On this date fifteen years ago, the Caps canned Terry Murray and replaced him behind the bench with Jim Schoenfeld. Schoney's Caps would finish the season on a 19-12-6 run and then beat the Penguins in six games in the first round of the playoffs before losing to the Rangers in five in the Eastern Conference semis.... Finally, Happy 54th Birthday to former Cap (and Versus' own) Brian Engblom.
54 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
JT60 a Resounding Dud? Really?
" . . . neither McPhee nor Coach Bruce Boudreau are likely to look anyone in the eye right now and say, “We think we’ve got a Stanley Cup goalie on our roster.” . . . . The Capitals need a goalie who, as the hockey folks like to say, can stand on his head when the team is down 1-0. McPhee has a little more than five weeks to go out and find him. Another defensemen would be nice, too, but a true Stanley Cup goalie is the key element the Caps don’t appear to have right now. Once, Theodore was that kind of goalie. The chances that he can be that good again for four rounds of playoffs are probably closer to slim than to none but not a lot better than that." (This from WaPo’s John Feinstein.)
I’m not entirely so sure JT is a failure and a discard at this point. My jury is still very much out. Well, not very much out. Possibly hovering at the door to come back in. But still out!
Still and all. To fritter away this year’s chances because of weak goaltending would be heartbreaking.
Frankly, the jury isn’t out for me – I think Theodore can be that guy. He has played well for a long stretch at this point and seems to have a lot of confidence in himself.
Things can always change with him (and perhaps that is the issue), but I don’t think there are any better, attainable options out there (nor were there this summer, IMO). Unless Chicago wants to trade Khabibulin for Nylander and Clark, that is!
"I don’t think there are any better, attainable options out there"
I agree with you, Grape. Seems as if that Feinstein is putting quite a burden on GMGM here. Of course, the key word is “attainable”. It depends on how desperate McPhee is by March, eh?
If we’re going to get any goalie, the only really option in my eyes is Niklas Backstrom. Wild are going to be sellers potentially, and will want an NHLer and a prospect for him. The problem is, for you guys, Clark and Nylander may go nowhere, and GMGM may move someone you don’t think deserves to go. And no one does, really. But for the team to get better, someone might have to. And the only way that GMGM can get a move for a goalie done is if he moves a goalie. I wouldn’t be surprised to see something like Neuwirth and Johnson (or theo) for Backstrom. I think a few people may not like the upcoming trade deadline, and are posting online for help from McPhee, but I have to say, I don’t see Nyls going anywhere.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Jan 27, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t see Nyls or Clark moving either, unless a team with cap room fighting for a playoff spot would take Nyls in a pure salary dump. I don’t see the Backstrom thing happening (though it would be instant comedy), but I am willing to trust in GMGM this year.
I just am not sure Backstrom is definitely better than Theodore. Theodore strikes me as good enough unless he has a meltdown, and even if he does the team has options in Johnson and even Varlamov.
Why is anyone putting any kind of credibility on what John Feinstein opines about hockey? My guess is that just about all of the regular contributors here have forgotten more about the sport than Feinstein knows. The arrogance of columnists, and Post columnists in particular, never ceases to amaze me. Guys like Feinstein haven’t paid a sniff of attention to the Caps for years and now they’re breaking down our goalies’ strengths and weaknesses like they’re Pierre Maguire. Just because they’ve awakened from their 40 year sleep and discovered the Caps are the hottest ticket in town doesn’t mean we have to pay them any respect. Screw Feinstein and Wilbon and all the other blowhards in town who are trying to latch on to the Caps. Everyone here knows more than they do combined.
Why is anyone putting any kind of credibility on what John Feinstein opines about hockey?
+1
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I love Feinstein
but he, like the rest of the Post Columnists are pretty ignorant to Hockey. Who cares if theys cover the Leafs too much. The Canadian media is best for hockey coverage.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
Jim Schoenfeld! I still remember when he was hired and George Michael showed THE clip on the 6 PM sports update: “Eat another donut, you fat pig!”
Our coaches haven’t lacked for personality. That’s certainly true.
Too bad he did that as a Devil’s coach. I’d have much rather been the team known with that distinction.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Jan 27, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
Ugh!
Versus again, ugh! If only the Caps radio broadcast over the internet could be in sync with the game…
Why would we want Kaberle for two years at 4.25 per when we’re ALREADY strapped for cap room?
I doubt the Leafs would want Nylander and his salary at 5 and 3 and a half for 3 more years when theyre trying to build with young guys (and i’m fairly certain Nylander isn’t a Brian Burke kind of player), and we would lose the room we get next year when Feds and his 4 are off the cap (plus its also the last year of Theodore’s deal). NEXT year is the year to make a type of deal like this if there’s something we need at the line.
And furthermore, where does Kaberle really fit here considering the personnel already present?
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jan 27, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions
We can’t get Kaberle without moving a defenseman. They’d want Leps, maybe, or Schultz. Hell, maybe McPhee will fleece them and get Schenn for Jurcina and Morrisonn. That’d make him GM of the year.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Jan 27, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
I doubt very much that Toronto would be interested in Lepisto because he’s looking more and more like a guy who can do well at the AHL level but not the NHL. Plus he doesn’t play anything remotely resembling Brian Burke’s preferred style of play. Plus the Leafs could get a much better offer than that for him, I would guess something analogous to what Buffalo got for Campbell. The most realistic option for the Capitals would probably be something like Morrisonn, Neuvirth, and a first round draft pick.
As for Schenn….Schenn’s a 19 year old top five pick from six months ago. He projects as a franchise defenseman and is the Leafs best prospect by miles. He’s not going anywhere, especially not for two depth defensemen.
One-time Caps GM, Roger Crozier used to have a term for lopsided proposed trades. He called it swapping a rowboat for a yacht. Schenn for Jurcina and Mo would fit that description.
I was being facetious. There’s no way we’re getting Schenn, and I know it. I think I was likely more alluding to that it wouldn’t make sense at all without moving a d-man. Why would we do something like that if our d-corps is healthy, which, they are/will be soon.(?)
So, if you’re going to get Kaberle, you need to move a d-man too. Toronto will, at this point, give up their high paying/underachievers for youth/prospects, and I’ve a feeling Lepisto’s going to pan out, if not here, then elsewhere. I don’t think he’ll be top 2, but he should get to a top 4 status. I’m also not so sure that with Wilson there, they’ll be playing Burke’s playstyle on the ice. Maybe in the office. I could see Leps in a Calle-Jo role there, not that he’d ever pull it off as well. I would rather see Leps in a Caps uniform when he develops, though.
Admittedly, I don’t get to watch many Hershey games, though.
Football's boring. Get over it.
Lepisto’s 24 and hasn’t been able to stick in the NHL thus far. Maybe he develops into something more but given that he’s struggled in his own end on defense this year and is listed at 176 pounds, I don’t see him being able to play defense in the NHL. I think he winds up like Joel Kwiatkowski, Jason Krog, Alexandre Giroux, or really Bruce Boudreau – great in the AHL but unable to make the leap the NHL. I think Lepisto’s high end potential is Brian Pothier: an okay defenseman who does well on the powerplay. But if I’m Burke I don’t place a whole lot of value on a guy who hasn’t proven much and might become a third pairing defenseman and powerplay specialist.
Lepisto
is a homeless mans Kaberle at the AHL level. Kaberle still moves the puck really efficiently. I saw him play an awesome game against the ‘Canes a couple of weeks ago on TSN and Pierre McGuire continually sung his praises. Brian Burke is desperate to trade him, but that doesn’t mean he won’t get a big return.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
Ah Brian Burke...
isn’t he the same guy that traded a 2nd round pick for Brian Sutherby? Sorry, I don’t see the genius of him.
He's only rebuilt two franchises out west
The Canucks were awful before he got there. Now they’re still feeling his impact. Drafted the franchise best scoring threats, the Sedins. Those Naslund-Bertuzzi-Morrison teams were so much fun to watch, and before he could make a deal for a real goalie he got fired.
Then in Anaheim he signed Scott Niedermayer and dealt for Pronger, all while relieving their budget by trading Fedorov and Sykora in favor of Getzlaf, Perry and Kunitz.
Sounds like a pretty good gm to me.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words—"mank" and "ind". What do these words mean? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind.
-Jack Handey
Meh
He inherited a pretty good team in Anaheim, though he did put them over the top, that’s for sure.
I’ll take GMGMs drafts of Ovechkin-Backstrom-Semin-Green-Alzner over Burke drafting both Sedins and Naslund-Assault&Bertuzzi-Morrison in their best seasons.
Burke drafted Perry. Here is a picture of him prior to finding out he’d be picking second in the Crosby draft.
But I think the point wasn’t as much that he drafted those players as it was the he was able to clear up roster space and get rid of bad contracts to revamp the team and let them succeed.
FWIW (from Burke’s Leafs bio):
Burke received two outstanding honours in the summer of 2008. On June 6, he was chosen by USA Hockey as General Manager of the 2010 U.S. Olympic Hockey Team, and was named a recipient of the 2008 Lester Patrick Award for outstanding service to hockey in the United States on August 7.
Burke was ranked No. 1 by The Hockey News in the magazine’s Annual GM Rankings in March of 2008, and was a finalist for The Hockey News Executive of the Year in 2006. He was named the Sporting News Executive of the Year in 2001, and was a runner-up for the same award following the 2005-06 season
LOL
Ok, he drafted Bobby Ryan, about a week after he took the job, I get the feeling the legwork was already done. I’m not saying Burke isn’t a really good GM, but the media seem to make it out like the guy is a freakin’ genius, he’s not. And if THN couldn’t figure out that Ken Holland is the best GM in hockey in 2008 that’s not my problem. :) He turned around Vancouver and led them to 4 playoff appearences before the lockout, if I’m looking into the future I’d say McPhee is going to do the same thing with this Caps team. (Knocking on wood, rubbing rabbits foot, crossing all digits) Is there anyone (other than some of us) who would say that GMGM is as good as Brian Burke? Other than a Stanley Cup he won with a team MOSTLY built by Brian Murray, I’m not that convinced that he is head and shoulders above the top 5-7 GMs in the league.
Speaking of Bobby Ryan, that kid is really good. I saw some of Anaheim’s loss to Pitt a few weeks ago, and he was making things happen out there.
Man what a screw job the Caps got that draft. How did Anaheim end up so high on the draft board? Wasn’t that a season or two removed from their Cup win? That whole post lockout draft lottery was a joke.
by Sombrero Guy on Jan 27, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
You were surprised?
The league had a chance to basically hand deliver Crosby into Pittsburgh, get the Pens a new arena and get Mario Lemieux paid. No really, that wasn’t rigged.
Other than a Stanley Cup he won with a team MOSTLY built by Brian Murray, I’m not that convinced that he is head and shoulders above the top 5-7 GMs in the league.
It’s a little tricky because of the lockout, but only about 1/3 of the players on the Stanley Cup team were regulars during Murray’s last season. Some of them had been drafted, but it was Burke who moved the bad contracts, which in turn let him acquire Pronger and Neidermeyer, the lynchpins of the team that season. I wouldn’t say he’s a genius, but I’d say he’s one of the league’s better GMs, even if he is behind guys like Holland, Laoriello, and perhaps Poile.
he’s a good veteran defenseman. if we acquire him, i’d say its pretty much a lock that Morrisson gets dealt or doesn’t resign with the Caps – and remember thats a $1.975 contract that would be off the books.
the above scenario would free up $2.6mil…
Kaberle is a good defenseman but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s worth what it would take to get him.
The Capitals are all but up against the cap, so to put on Kaberle’s $4.25M salary, they’d need to free up almost that much cap space. Moving Morrisonn would free up $1.975M, but there’s no way (that I can think of) to free up that additional ~$2.25M other than trading Nylander. Even assuming Nylander could be persuaded to waive that no-movement clause, the Capitals would probably have to pay another team to take him off their hands, i.e. rather than Neuvirth, a first rounder pick, and Morrisonn for Kaberle it would become Neuvrith, Morrisonn, Nylander, a first round pick, and a second round pick.
The idea of the Capitals getting a top flight late season acquisition is just unrealistic in my opinion, given their cap situation.
I don’t know that I’d be looking for another puck-moving D-man, honestly. Between Poti, Alzner, and Green, puck-movers we got. What we need is someone who can and will kick/intimidate/bully the other team out of the crease, who will answer the bell if necessary (but won’t go crazy) and who will take the body so that his teammate can take the puck.
I’m not that good with other guys around the league, but who fits that bill?
by gotsparkly on Jan 27, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Help, please
Just read that Ovie flew in to Boston with the “enemies” Thomas and Savard. Good thinking, they always say to keep your enemies close.
Thought Savard seemed pretty cool and did a good job mic’d up for the ASG so I need your help – give me some reason to start hatin’ on him again for tonite. He sure looked good partnered with Ovie, too…
Sorry, no help here.
Marc Savard and Ovechkin really made a scary-good pairing.
I don’t hate Boston. They’re a good team and their guys seem pretty cool. I do, however, want their conference top seed, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with curbstomping them and every other team in the league to get it.
Fun Fact of the Day
Marc Savard, $5 million per.
Michael Nylander, $4.875 per.
Amazing what that extra $125,000 a year gets ya!
I beat Marc Savard’s wife didn’t demand a NMC either…
by CapitalsKremlin on Jan 27, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
Ovechkin Cameo Appearance
…just to lighten things up a bit
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jan 27, 2009 2:12 PM EST reply actions
Sorry, that link didn’t copy right…
Try this one.
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jan 27, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
Steve Dangle and his Leafs Fan Reaction V-Blog is one of the funniest sites out there. I’ve become a somewhat of a follower of the Leafs simply because I like watching his videos about the team.
by CapitalsKremlin on Jan 27, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions





































