Comments / New

Capitals vs. Rangers Recap: New York Holds off Third-Period Pressure to Beat Washington

Ice TrackerGame SummaryEvent SummaryShot ReportFaceoff SummaryPlay-by-PlayHome TOIVisitor TOI – Advanced Stats at: war-on-ice, hockeystats, Natural Stat Trick and more via Nice Time On Ice

Usually, a few days off this time of year gives a hockey team a chance to get healthy. For the Caps, however… not so much, as Mike Green and Brooks Orpik – both of whom played in the team’s last game Saturday night – were unable to go when the Rangers came calling for Wednesday’s “Rivalry Night.” New York, for its part, has been playing some of the best hockey in the League for a half-season or so, but did battle with the first-place Islanders last night, so the depleted-but-rested Caps got a chance to face a surging-but-tired club (that keeps winning, despite being without all-everything netminder Henrik Lundqvist). And with three of their remaining 15 games against the Rangers – and then a potential first-round match-up looming thereafter – this was certainly one of those “measuring stick” games for the Caps.

Unfortunately, the Caps couldn’t match-up, as Cam Talbot held off third-period pressure and a bad John Carlson turnover sealed their fate, giving the Rangers a 3-1 win and two big points.

Here’s Wednesday night’s Plus/Minus:

  • Plus: The offense… in the third period. Down a goal entering the frame, the Caps had a 35-10 advantage in shot attempts (and 16-7 in shots on goal) in the third, all at even-strength save for a couple of minutes of six-on-five time. It was both too little and too late.
  • Minus: The offense… for the first two periods. The Caps registered just nine even-strength shots on goal through the first two periods (and added just three in 4:25 of power-play time, which included 1:18 of a fruitless five-on-three). And it wasn’t only a depth issue, either – neither Alex Ovechkin (who scored the Caps’ goal on the power play) nor Nicklas Backstrom had an even-strength shot on goal through forty minutes, and the duo was only on the ice for two five-on-five shot attempts. The third period was much, much better, but twenty minutes of good hockey is rarely going to be enough against a top team.

And now, this…

Game highlights:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments