Comments / New

The All-Time Capitals Team Tournament, Part VI

We’re halfway through Round 2 (you can check out the first half and vote here), so let’s wrap up the Elite Eight, shall we?

***


S Season GP ROW ROL T/SO Adj Pts Pts% GF GF Rk GA GA Rk
2 2009-10 82 49 22 11 109 .665 318 1/30 233 16/30
7 1999-00 82 44 26 12 100 .610 227 13/28 194 4/28

No team in this tournament won their first-round “series” as convincingly as the 2009-10, which took 91% of the vote – a four-game sweep (something the real Caps, by the way, have never achieved). Perhaps it’s how fresh that team’s regular-season dominance is in everyone’s mind, or a subconscious longing to rewrite a tiny bit of history for that team (and ignore its shortcomings)… or maybe it’s just that that squad was really, really good. As we noted:

The 121 points that the 2009-10 Caps posted in winning the Presidents’ Trophy obliterated the franchise’s previous record (108 the season before), but that includes five shootout wins and seven overtime losses (points that earlier teams couldn’t have been awarded). Of course, that’d be like noting that a hypothetical Usain Bolt record time was wind-aided – even so, he’d have been pretty damn fast, and that 2009-10 Caps team was pretty damn good. The 318 goals it scored were 17% more than second-place Vancouver, the power-play clicked on better than one-quarter of its opportunities, and the team’s goals-against average was, well, average. Alex Ovechkin, with his 50 goals (one off the League-lead… and probably should’ve been tied) and 109 points, was voted the players’ MVP; Nicklas Backstrom topped the century mark as well; Mike Green was a Norris Trophy finalist; Alex Semin had a 40-40 (goals-assists) campaign; four other Caps (Mike Knuble, Brooks Laich, Tomas Fleischmann and Eric Fehr) all topped 20 goals; and the League’s top-five in plus-minus were all Caps (led by Jeff Schultz’s good fortune whopping plus-50). All of that offense made it easy for the team’s trio of goaltenders to win, and Jose Theodore did that 30 times in 47 appearances (despite a 2.81 GAA and decent .911 save percentage), Semyon Varlamov won 15 times in 26 games, and Michal Neuvirth posted 9 wins in 17 games.

We know what happened to that team in the first round that mattered (i.e. reality), but they had no trouble advancing past the 1992-93 team here. And that’s the great thing about this tournament – every let down has a counterbalance. Even when a Caps team inevitably chokes, a different Caps team still wins. Alas, fantasy is only so satisfying. Anyway, the 2009-10 team will face the Caps’ first Southeast Division (pour a little out) Champ, the 1999-00 team, and its Vezina-winning goalie, Olie Kolzig (41-20-11/2.24/.917). Luckily for them, they didn’t have to face the Pittsburgh Penguins in Round 1 of our bracket, but the 2010-11 team gave them all they could handle, with the 1999-00 team advancing by a single vote. Let’s call it a Game 7 overtime goal for Peter Bondra, from Adam Oates and Sergei Gonchar. It could happen… it just didn’t.

So which team would win a best-of-seven, 2009-10 or 1999-00? Could Kolzig have Halak’d the underdogs to victory, or will Boudreau’s boys continue their romp through this Tourney?


S Season GP ROW ROL T/SO Adj Pts Pts% GF GF Rk GA GA Rk
14 1997-98 82 40 30 12 92 .561 219 13/26 202 10/26
6 1991-92 80 45 27 8 98 .613 330 2/22 275 11/22

There was only one upset among our eight first-round match-ups, and that was, perhaps unsurprisingly, the 1997-98 team won the only Prince of Wales trophy in franchise history. (They took their first round series here in six games.) As we detailed last round:

The season itself was largely unremarkable with three notable exceptions: Peter Bondra leading the League in goals (tied at 52 with Teemu Selanne), Olie Kolzig firmly establishing himself as the number one goaltender (33-18-10/2.20/.920) after Bill Ranford went down with an injury early on and the trio of Adam Oates, Dale Hunter and Phil Housley all reaching the 1,000-point plateau, the only time in League history as many teammates hit have that milestone in the same season. Other than that, it was typical Caps – hard-working, solid defense (including a #1-ranked, 89.2% effective penalty kill) and never enough offense (other than Bondra, the team had two forwards in the teens in goals scored and no one else up front with as many as a dozen). In fact, the team’s +0.2 per-game goal differential was the worst of any team in our little tournament.

More importantly, what that team did (that so many of its Caps brethren hadn’t and haven’t done) was peak at the right time, especially defensively, as Kolzig posted a .941 playoff save percentage and a 1.95 goals against average with four shutouts in 21 games (one wonders if he got any consideration for the Conn Smythe that Steve Yzerman won with six goals and 24 points in 22 games). Oates and Juneau each had 17 playoff points, and the Caps had a half-dozen players that scored six or seven goals. Those Caps were certainly a tough out, and lost each of the first three games in the Finals by a single goal to that Detroit juggernaut.

That 1997-98 squad draws the 1991-92 team in Round 2 (after they coasted in five games in Round 1), a group we labeled as a tourney dark horse (recall that our pal Ed Frankovic had these guys as the best in franchise history a few years back). As we noted then:

And then, well, the Penguins happened.

So which team would win a best-of-seven, 1991-92 or 1997-98? Could Kolzig et. al. pull off another upset win for Ron Wilson, or would Terry Murray’s deep offensive-minded squad prevail?

***

And one vote to go (below) and we’ve got our Final Four. Here’s how the bracket’s looking…

Capitals_tourney_part_vi_large

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Talking Points