Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

The Caps and Zone Starts and Shifts

Photo

For a while now, we've been harping on the Caps' need to ice a third line that, along with a hopefully fortified fourth line, is capable of taking defensive-zone draws. This past season, the team's third line - usually centered by Marcus Johansson or Mathieu Perreault, both of whom were dreadful in the face-off circle - was one that Bruce Boudreau couldn't put out for those draws with much confidence in them getting the job done. As a result, it was up to either the fourth line or Nicklas Backstrom and the top trio to pick up the defensive-zone slack (since the second line, more often than not, was centered by whichever of the poor-drawing rookies wasn't on the third line).

Backstrom's dramatic reduction in offensive-zone starts this year not only hurt his (and linemate Alex Ovechkin's) numbers, but also the team's ability to generate offense by virtue of who was getting those offensive zone draws. As Gabe Desjardins put it a couple of years ago, "when you lose a faceoff in your own end, opponent shots on goal go up so quickly that it's as though you gave the other team a 10-15 second power-play. For several seconds, the rate of shots allowed is as high as it is on a 5-on-3." So the difference between Backstrom - who won 51.9% of his even-strength faceoffs in 2010-11 - taking those draws versus Perreault (44.6%) or Johansson (39.8%) is not insignificant, and that's without even considering their respective linemates. (And all of this further explains why Boudreau had to essentially trade in all of those Backstrom O-zone draws for D-zone draws in the first place.) Perhaps unfortunately, one player who would be an ideal third-line center for this team (pushing Johansson up to the second-line pivot role) is pending free agent Brooks Laich, who fared well in the middle late last season... but who likely doesn't envision himself as a third-liner (to put it mildly).

Anyway, that, in a nutshell is an issue that should be a priority in the off-season for the Caps, and the good news is that competent third-line centers are both more plentiful and cheaper than second-line pivots on the open market.

But before all of these critical offensive- and defensive-zone faceoffs take place, there are stoppages in play that have come as a result of one team's good shift. As The Falconer put it long ago (back when Atlanta had an NHL team), "a good offensive shift often results in a) the opposition icing the puck; b) the goaltender freezes the puck; c) the opposition deflects the puck out. All three of these non-scoring outcomes results in a faceoff in the offensize zone." (If this sounds familiar, we've discussed it before). The Falconer continues:

If we look at the LONG RUN of a full NHL season, the better players are going to have more shifts that finish in the offensive zone compared to the number that began back in their own defensive zone. Zone shift captures this basic intuition--players with positive numbers usually are better at shifting the puck out of the D Zone and into the O Zone over the course of a season.

Which brings us to the question of the day: which Caps are performing best when it comes to shifting zones at five-on-five? With our expectations set (nice work, by the way) and our data set of Caps' zone starts (minimum 20 games played), we'll take a look after the jump.

Star-divide

 


PlayerStartOZone%FinOzone%Expected FinOzone%Δ
Marco Sturm 52.0 54.0 50.7 3.32
John Carlson 50.1 52.9 50.1 2.81
Mathieu Perreault 54.6 53.7 51.4 2.27
Karl Alzner 49.4 51.7 49.9 1.76
Nicklas Backstrom 51.0 51.5 50.4 1.12
Dennis Wideman 51.7 51.3 50.6 0.69
Brooks Laich 53.5 51.7 51.1 0.57
Alex Ovechkin 51.6 51.0 50.5 0.47
Jason Chimera 50.9 50.8 50.4 0.42
Alexander Semin 55.0 50.5 51.6 -1.08
Mike Green 52.0 49.6 50.7 -1.08
Tom Poti 51.2 49.3 50.5 -1.16
Tyler Sloan 52.4 49.5 50.8 -1.33
Matt Bradley 50.0 48.4 50.1 -1.69
Mike Knuble 55.0 49.5 51.6 -2.08
Eric Fehr 55.2 49.4 51.6 -2.18
Jason Arnott 54.5 48.9 51.4 -2.53
Boyd Gordon 42.7 44.8 47.9 -3.05
Jeff Schultz 50.0 46.6 50.1 -3.49
John Erskine 52.1 46.7 50.7 -3.98
Jay Beagle 42.0 42.7 47.7 -5.00
Scott Hannan 48.8 44.6 49.7 -5.11
Matt Hendricks 51.7 45.1 50.6 -5.51
Marcus Johansson 58.9 46.3 52.8 -6.47

Note: Those are full-season numbers, not just stats accumulated while playing for the Caps.

There's plenty to digest there, but the two biggest takeaways are probably how incredible John Carlson and Karl Alzner were last year (especially when you consider that they faced the toughest competition on the team) and how utterly dominated Marcus Johansson was over the course of the season (though one would suspect that his numbers here improved as the season wore on).

Hockey is often mentioned in the same breath as football when folks are talking about contact sports. But the two games may be even more similar in that "field position" - creating and taking advantage of it - matters enormously. Everyone knows that's the case when it comes to pigskin. But getting an understanding of zone starts and shifts and their importance helps in getting a better understanding of hockey. And it's something to keep an eye on as the Caps enter an important off-season.

Facebook_16 Twitter_16

Comment 43 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Japers' Rink

Saturday Caps Clips

May 2012 by J.P. - 25 comments

Friday Caps Clips

May 2012 by EmilyB - 83 comments

The Noon Number

May 2012 by J.P. - 7 comments

2011-12 Rink Wrap: Mike Green

May 2012 by J.P. - 51 comments

The Noon Number

May 2012 by J.P. - 6 comments

Thursday Caps Clips

May 2012 by EmilyB - 313 comments

Comments

Display:

(Btw, you can sort the columns by clicking on the headers.)

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 10, 2011 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Alzner is so good he appears twice.

"Shots aren't the important thing. Scoring chances are way more important than shots." - Bruce Boudreau

See my work on WaPo's Capitals Insider, ESPN Insider and Russian Machine Never Breaks (RMNB) Insider. I also log the Caps scoring chances. The 2010-11 summary spreadsheet is posted on Google Docs.

Follow me on Twitter @ngreenberg

by NGreenberg on Jun 10, 2011 10:04 AM EDT reply actions  

The second one is for the beard.

"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg

by Bald Pollack on Jun 10, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

My initial reaction is, why are there so many more negative deltas than positive? Does that indicate that puck possession, forechecking and cycling are team-wide problems?

by Kolzilla on Jun 10, 2011 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, something is wrong. In the end starts and finishes have to equal out – where one player left the game is where another one came in. But if only Gordon, Beagle, Hannan, and maybe an Alzner are negative start then how can more than half the team be negative finish?

by six hole on Jun 10, 2011 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree. Something looks funny to me. Going to the BtN stats, in aggregate for this group there are 7,305 offensive zone finishes, but only 6,296 offensive zone starts. 7,485 defensive zone finishes, but only 5,924 defensive zone starts.

Collective StartOZone% is 51.5%, but collective FinOZone% is 49.4%.

Data skewed by players that weren’t here all year? Special teams transitions?

by psuscott1 on Jun 10, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

More data

Just ran the numbers for a few more teams and it’s definitely all screwy. Same method as above, only players w/ 20+ games.

Team ….. Starts (O-D-N) ….. Finishes (O-D-N)
WAS . 6296 . 5924 . 7617 … 7305 . 7485 . 6869
VAN .. 6021 . 5660 . 6857 … 7145 . 7020 . 6064
BOS . 5755 . 6200 . 7519 … 7059 . 7062 . 6784
PHI .. 5595 . 6082 . 7672 … 7064 . 7206 . 6967

And to try a team that wasn’t good:
EDM . 4716 . 4584 . 6177 … 5972 . 5813 . 5391

So first off, total finishes are higher than starts by 7-11%. Starts are much more likely to be in neutral than finishes (is that just the faceoff at every period?). And I don’t see any real relationship between start and finish ratio, not to mention team quality and those ratios.

So I think the data is screwy. We can talk about players under 20 games and trades, penalties, icings, goalies being pulled … but I can’t see how they explain it.

by six hole on Jun 10, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK, the start vs finish total discrepancy is explained pretty well when PP/PK is included (only looked at the Caps). There are a few hundred more extra starts in each of those. And I take it from some earlier post that BtN has already moved goals to the finish end they happened on instead of neutral zone. But I still don’t understand why WAS and other good teams would be net negative on finishes, unless penalties (for and against) are a lot more likely to happen at our defensive end of the ice.

by six hole on Jun 10, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d look at the full data set, not just greater than 20 games. I’d also think that EN and penalty situations have an effect – lots of stoppages in those situations.

As for offensive zone starts nit matching finishes, you can start in the neutral zone and finish in the o zone, or vice versa.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 12:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Of course one player can make a shift from N → O but one player’s finish (when they go off the ice) will become another player’s start. And when they don’t line up in aggregate there should be an explanation. A Semin HHT penalty in the O zone (finish) turns into a 4v5 D start, as an example. But there’s still something big missing.

King, Gordon, Fahey, Collins, Willsie, and Aucoin don’t begin to account for the difference. I’d have an easier time believing the trades as an explanation, but still don’t see it.

Are icings massively in our favor (and not adjusted in stats)?

by six hole on Jun 10, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know either BtN or Timeonice counts icings and the other doesn’t.

Faceoffs to resume 5on5 play? Say on the PK you push the puck up the ice, the penalty expires, you get a weak wrister on net, puck frozen. You’ll get on offensive zone start, but no offensive zone finish (as it wasn’t a 5on5 finish). That’s my guess.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
To help with basic Timeonice functions.
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.

by red army line on Jun 11, 2011 3:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Which brings us to the question of the day: which Caps are performing best when it comes to shifting zones at five-on-five?

Also, amazing legwork putting this together, but a lot of the differences between expected and actual zone finishes vary maybe 1-3% for most of these players. How significant is that? How much does an extra 1% affect game outcomes in real life?

by Kolzilla on Jun 10, 2011 10:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Well, Leino’s zone start numbers are lopsided (62.3% O zone) but that comes out to only 2 more O zone draws per game. Judging by that, I’d say -1% was probably not too significant on a game-to-game basis. I’m sure somebody is ready to point out that it’s much more significant in aggregate.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d also add that “taking care of the football/puck” have both gotten a lot more attention in recent years. It’s probably more obvious in football, but the high quality NHL teams really talk about making smart decisions with the puck, and it shows.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

“a good offensive shift often results in a) the opposition icing the puck; b) the goaltender freezes the puck; c) the opposition deflects the puck out. All three of these non-scoring outcomes results in a faceoff in the offensize zone.”

What about forcing a team to take a penalty in its own zone?

If you've read this far...seek help.

by ThePeerless on Jun 10, 2011 10:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Certainly that’s important as well. Or forcing the team to take a penalty in our zone (effectively kills their offensive rush, gives us a free pass to their zone… and of course the PP). Probably an overlooked issue of Semin’s offensive zone penalties. Its not just the PK that sucks, its that we just lost an offensive zone possession AND they get a free pass into our zone.

Sometimes I feel like we don’t force teams to earn their way into our zone hard enough. I’m not suggesting we employ a trap or anything, but better puck possession and better passing might help with these issues.

by feeya7 on Jun 10, 2011 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you so much!

This is a wonderfully written article on some very deep and meaningful data. Thanks for compiling it. These types of “stats” are never given their due diligence and/or properly interpreted. You’ve done both well. And its comparison to football is right on. A QB trying to score after an interception puts them on the opposition 35 yrd is a lot easier than trying to score on your own 20 after the other team’s kickoff. It shows to be important in hockey as well.

by feeya7 on Jun 10, 2011 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Pardon my ignorance but how is the ExpectedFinOzone% determined?

Proud to be a Caps fan. Its a Great Day for Hockey.

by 4capitals2 on Jun 10, 2011 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Start with the post and look at the nice curve they show:
http://www.behindthenethockey.com/2011/6/9/2210569/bzs-2-0-ironing-things-out-a-bit

You should expect a regression to the mean (50%) so that someone starting only 40% in offense would wind up higher (47% maybe) but not all the way to 50%. Someone really high (65%) would wind up lower (55%) but not as close to the mean as that 40% player.

by six hole on Jun 10, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent

This is an excellent piece of analysis. I think the best of the postseason thus far, and really underscores the need for a 3C and/or moving Laich to 3C.

I guess this is why coaches like to talk about gaining 3 zones and getting a faceoff.

And BTW-It kind of proves a point Gouldie made about Marco Sturm being a responsible defensive player, who on a decent third line could play a good role in gaining possession and changing momentum. I wonder if there’s an argument for bringing him back.

The good news is that this is a very fixable problem. Oh and this whole discussion tends to invalidate the “your best players need to be your best players” cliche. Cause if they start in their d-zone all the time, they just won’t do much.

by JPN888 on Jun 10, 2011 12:59 PM EDT reply actions  

The argument for or against Sturm will likely come down to dollars.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Having thought about it a bit…the Delta in the chart is actually the same thing as BZS.

Does he call it Luongo underwear?

Co-Manager at Behind the Net

by Bettman's Nightmare on Jun 10, 2011 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

As Gabe Desjardins put it a couple of years ago, “when you lose a faceoff in your own end, opponent shots on goal go up so quickly that it’s as though you gave the other team a 10-15 second power-play. For several seconds, the rate of shots allowed is as high as it is on a 5-on-3.”

I took issue with this line a while back, and I still find it problematic. If the statement as meant as a purely positive description about shot rate, then fine. But if that’s the case, it’s not a very meaningful comment. I suspect it’s meant to claim that losing a D zone draw is akin to actually being on a 5 on 3 for 10-15 seconds. I can’t disagree with that any more vigorously. Shot rate isn’t everything. It’s not good to lose a D zone draw, but it’s not like you automatically lose a man or two, either. You still have 5 guys to defend. You’re still able to thwart the opponents more thoroughly. And at the very least you have more bodies to block shots or box out rebounds.

How many times have you actually seen a 5 on 3 executed that seems anything close to it’s maximum capability for shots per minute? Probably never. 5 on 3s slow the play down and look for certain shots. Dare I say it, quality shots. If shot rate was more important, you’d see much less puck movement and more shots just fired at net. After all, it’s easier to find a shooting lane at 5 on 3. Further, if all you need is a shooting lane, then you just need to take a step or two back and you open up a lot of lanes to shoot. But where do 5 on 3s set up? Right around the top of the circle. To get closer to the goalie. Not to maximize shot rate. Even with the higher 5 on 3 shot rate, the numbers don’t tell the whole story. If shot rate was any kind of goal for 5 on 3 units, the shot rate would be much higher. Possibly even triple what it already is (just imagine if every cross ice pass was a puck thrown at net instead). Implicit in the very way NHL teams approach the 5 on 3 is that quality of the shot matters more than shot rate.

Or literally every NHL coach is clueless on the 5 on 3 and should probably be fired because they are stupid.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 4:17 PM EDT reply actions   3 recs

* Aw shit, threadjack

I think it’s telling that we have so many negatives. To me that speaks to the one-and-done nature our offense so frequently falls into. We don’t spend entire shifts in the O zone, we spend moments.

I know you have to consider the starts for context, but if ending the shift in the O zone is a sign of moving the play the right direction, shouldn’t we be looking at a list of absolute O zone finish%? At the very least it’s an indication that these guys aren’t getting pinned in their own end very frequently.

I’d also love to see some work into what happens after certain line changes, but I’m not even sure how we could do it now. For example, if the puck is dumped in and both teams change, which set of on-coming players has the advantage? The team that dumped the puck in has fresh players with a territorial advantage, but the retrieving team has fresh players coming on with a controlled break out and a skating head start (usually to close to their blue line). Given that at leas half the game is played on the fly, I think that’d go a long way to helping us understand which players move the play which direction.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know you have to consider the starts for context, but if ending the shift in the O zone is a sign of moving the play the right direction, shouldn’t we be looking at a list of absolute O zone finish%?

Not if 70% of Zone finish is explained by zone start.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe. But lots of shifts start in the D zone, and don’t end in a whistle (or end in a neutral zone draw). Lots of shifts start on the fly and end in a D/O zone face off. Your population isn’t really the same set of shifts. I’m sure some are, but for lots of shifts you only have one data point. That does concern me a little bit in terms of drawing conclusions between O zone start and finish percentages. What you can say for sure is that a shift that ends in the offensive zone was a positive for the team.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

The finishes, which are recorded independently of the starts and are agnostic to things like where the guy started, regress 70% of the way back to 50% throughout the league.

I agree it’s a good thing, which is why it’s worth looking at, but I definitely like looking at who was pulling the wagon further than expected, rather than anchoring it down.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree that it’s agnostic. You can’t say the starts explain the finishes if you are talking about different shifts.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m saying that if you take everyone’s zone start, then everyone’s zone finish (which doesn’t necessarily coincide with that shift, if they dump and change, or something similar), then throughout the league there’s a 70% regression. Zone start → Zone finish doesn’t have the granularity to track individual shifts, just who was on the ice when play was stopped and who was on the ice when play restarts.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, and that leaves a lot of the picture out. You don’t know how those D zone starts end. You don’t know where those O zone finishes began. There’s a lot of room for variation in there.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can say that if you simply look at the data there’s a 70% regression back to a neutral ratio, before any other analysis of cause is applied.

I don’t know the why of which players break through and which players get dragged back, but I do know that just looking at who finishes in the OZone doesn’t tell you much about the player when that number is so sensitive to how often they start in the OZone.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

nice article. I’ve taken some flack in the player recaps for the negative assessment I had of Schultz, Boyd, and especially Marjo where I was significantly out of the mainstream. This suits my confirmation bias perfectly.

by CarlosLA on Jun 10, 2011 5:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I never saw someone look so pretty while putting up such poor stats as Mackan.

A kitten on fire, a baby in a blender, both sound as sweet as a playoff surrender.

by Rob Parker on Jun 10, 2011 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

After the first couple months of the season, AO was going backwards in zone shift and had a Corsi Rel in the low single digits. He healed, or played his way into shape, or something, because he had to be putting up something close to his career numbers after that to get back to where he finished out.

Mackan did much the same thing, I think, but instead of moving from ‘meh’ to ‘superstar’, he moved from ‘holy shit this kid is getting killed’ to ‘not bad for a rookie, holding his own, kinda’.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

are there Corsi Rel or Zone Start splits anywhere? I agree Mackan skated fast and pretty even when getting creamed, and my impression was he played better as the season went along, but I’d love to see some advanced splits if they exist.

by CarlosLA on Jun 10, 2011 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t have anything except my imperfect recall (and getting more imperfect as I age!) on that. I do remember checking out the stats and shitting a brick about how badly AO was getting housed.

Possibly you could write a query on timeonice if you cared to check the game numbers out on nhl.com to get those splits. I’ll look into it.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Jun 10, 2011 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair, his faceoff percentage and early season struggles probably had a lot to do with some of his poorer advanced metrics. Also spending a lot of time down on the 3rd line which wasn’t really a shutdown/possession line more of an attempt at a pseudo 3rd scoring line was sure to not have helped. It’s certainly easier to say he got much better as the season went on and needs to improve his faceoffs big time in the offseason. He certainly had his bad moments in the D zone but I saw many great defensive plays from him that prevented goals or at least quality scoring opportunities all season.

Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.

by Davethecapsfan on Jun 10, 2011 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve taken some flack in the player recaps for the negative assessment I had of Schultz, Boyd, and especially Marjo where I was significantly out of the mainstream. This suits my confirmation bias perfectly.

I’m just venting on this aloud (mainly because this is the second straight day I’ve seen a similarly toned comment), but if anyone feels their sage wisdom isn’t being appreciated or taken for granted, I’ll be happy to buy them a cross that they can nail themselves to. In the meantime, it’s the Internet, OK?

"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg

by Bald Pollack on Jun 10, 2011 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

If you can’t see the tongue mostly in cheek especially given the last sentence, I can’t help ya.

Besides, the caliber of discussion here is way too high to be lumped in with the internet broadly. I learn a bunch from the discussions — doesn’t mean I always end up agreeing — but also doesn’t mean I’m above the occasional good natured “Ha!” when I can play it.

by CarlosLA on Jun 10, 2011 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m simply putting a stop to something that’s been an annoying trend. If you can’t see that, I can’t help ya.

"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg

by Bald Pollack on Jun 10, 2011 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

way to put a stop to it. you’re like a one man maginot line keeping the internet just as you like it. we can all rest easy.

by CarlosLA on Jun 10, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, one smartass user at a time.

"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg

by Bald Pollack on Jun 11, 2011 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators