Scoping Out the (Potential) Enemy
As we head into the final weekend of the 2010-11 regular season, a lot of things remain up in the air - not the least of which, of course, is where the Capitals themselves will finish.
And while that is (mostly) in their hands, something that's completely out of their control is which team they draw for their first round playoff match-up. With just one or two games left for each team, there are four different possibilities: the Buffalo Sabres, the Carolina Hurricanes, the Montreal Canadiens or the New York Rangers.
A look at each of the potential opponents after the jump...
BUFFALO SABRES
92 pts; 7th in East with 2 games remaining
17% chance of 6th, 73% chance of 7th, 8% chance of 8th, 3% chance of 9th*
Season Series: Caps win, 3-0-1
Key Players
Thomas Vanek: 5 points (3G, 2A) in 4 games
Tim Connolly: 4 points (4A) in 4 games
Ryan Miller: 2.32 GAA, 0.924 save % in 3 games vs Washington
Alexander Semin: 5 points (2G, 3A) in 4 games
Nicklas Backstrom: 5 points (2G, 3A) in 4 games
Jason Chimera: 3 assists, +4 in 4 games
Did you know? The four power play goals the Caps have scored against the Sabres is tied for second-most they've scored against any opponent this year. The only team against whom they've scored more power play goals is Philadelphia (six).
Why Caps fans should fear this matchup: Because three of the four games between the Caps and Sabres this year have been one-goal games, including two that required overtime. Because the Sabres have scored the most goals of any of the three teams in the mix. And because Ryan Miller is capable of stealing a game or two all on his own.
Why Caps fans shouldn't fear this matchup: Because the second-biggest Cap-killer this year, Jordan Leopold (1G, 3A in 3 games) is out of the lineup with a broken finger. Because Shaone Morrisonn will be in the lineup...if he's not a healthy scratch, at least. And because the Sabres appear to be one of the few teams against whom the Caps can score power play goals, with four in four games.
CAROLINA HURRICANES
89 pts; 9th in East with 2 games remaining
63% chance of 9th, 34% chance of 8th, 3% chance of 7th*
Season Series: Caps win, 5-0-1
Key Players
Tuomo Ruutu: 5 points (2G, 3A) in 6 games
Jussi Jokinen: 4 points (2G, 2A) in 6 games
Alex Ovechkin: 8 points (2G, 6A) and +7 in 6 games
Nicklas Backstrom: 5 points (4G, 1A) in 5 games
Did you know? All but one of the six games between the Caps and 'Canes was a one-goal affair, and in all but one of the six games the winning team scored (or "scored" via the shootout) three goals.
Why Caps fans should fear this matchup: Because Eric Staal may have been relatively quiet this year but still has almost a point per game against the Caps in his career. Because Tuomo Ruutu already broke one of the Caps' defensemen. And because Cam Ward has a Stanley Cup and a Conn Smythe trophy to his name...i.e., he's pretty good when the games count the most.
Why Caps fans shouldn't fear this matchup: Because the one win the Hurricanes have managed against the Caps came via the shootout. Because Joe Corvo will be trying to defend against Alex Ovechkin. And because Alexander Semin loves to score on the 'Canes, with more goals (25) and points (42) against Carolina than any other team in his career.
(Richard Wolowicz / Getty Images)
MONTREAL CANADIENS
94 pts; 6th in East with 1 game remaining
83% chance of 6th, 17% chance of 7th*
Season Series: Caps win, 3-0-1
Key Players
Brian Gionta: 2 goals in 4 games
Tomas Plekanec: 20 points (10G, 10A) in 24 career games vs. Washington
Semyon Varlamov: 0.96 GAA, 0.968 save % and one shutout in 2 games (3-0-1, 1.45 GAA, 0.950 save % career vs. Montreal; 3-3, 2.41GAA, 0.908 save % in the playoffs)
Marcus Johansson: 2 goals in 4 games
Marco Sturm: 3 points (1G, 2A) in 2 games
Did you know? The Canadiens are one of two teams the Caps have shut out twice this year (the other being Pittsburgh), and the Caps have allowed just five goals in the four games vs. Montreal.
Why Caps fans should fear this matchup: Because they've already solved the Caps once in the playoffs and play a similar style to the one that was so effective a year ago. Because Carey Price has held his team in playoff contention despite having an injury-depleted defense in front of him. And because the Bell Centre continues to be one of the toughest buildings in the NHL.
Why Caps fans shouldn't fear this matchup: Because while the Caps struggled against Montreal last year, foreshadowing a tough playoff matchup, they've dominated this year's season series. Because Semyon Varlamov has better numbers against Montreal than any other team. And because the power play that was beyond ineffective against the Habs last spring has clicked in the four games this year.
(Nick Laham / Getty Images)
NEW YORK RANGERS
91 pts; 8th in East with 1 game remaining
7% chance of 7th, 59% chance of 8th, 34% chance of 9th*
Season Series: Rangers win, 3-1-0
Key Players
Brian Boyle: 7 points (3G, 4A) in 4 games
Henrik Lundqvist: 1.34 GAA, 0.955 save % and 2 shutouts in 3 games
Brooks Laich: 3 points (2G, 1A) in 4 games
Mike Green: 13 points (5G, 8A) in 16 career games vs. NYR
Did you know? Two of the more lopsided games in the Caps' loss column came at the hands of the Rangers, as they were outscored 13-0 in those two games. Through two games the Rangers scored three more goals than either the Lightning or the Hurricanes did in their entire six-game series against the Caps.
Why Caps fans should fear this matchup: Because the Rangers have shown the ability to be both offensively explosive and defensively stingy - and have done so twice against the Caps this year. Because while the Caps are masters of the late comeback, the Rangers have yet to lose a game this year in which they've led after two periods. And because Henrik Lundqvist is Henrik Lundqvist.
Why Caps fans shouldn't fear this matchup: Because with Ryan Callahan out of the lineup, the Rangers are missing one of their better offensive talents, a strong penalty-killer and a team leader. Because the Rangers have yet to face the new, improved Caps. And because Henrik Lundqvist may be Henrik Lundqvist...but Matt Bradley is also Matt Bradley.
*All percentages via sportsclubstats.com
231 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Awesome post. Thanks.
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
Re-posting from Clips, odds that the Caps face the following (per Sports Club):
NYR – 53.2%
CAR – 30.5%
BUF – 14.5%
MTL – 1.8%
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
This years’ Rangers are my personal least favorite of these matchups
You got no fear of the underdog, that's why you will not survive
- Spoon (Austin TX)
Wow, did you watch that game against the Trash last night? The Rangers are to be respected, but we should clean their clocks… Seriously. If we have trouble, we don’t deserve to move on.
No I didn’t, but I know they had another crappy game recently against…. Buffalo wasn’t it(?) so that does sound pretty consistent with their play of late. I do think they have more potential upside than the other options.
TSN’s power rankings have them above the Caps so really that’s all we need to know right?
(J.O.K.E.)
You got no fear of the underdog, that's why you will not survive
- Spoon (Austin TX)
i’m not sure you can call their performance recently consistently spotty. they had a hell of a comeback against the bruins.
And the Thrash had our number all season, so just because they beat the Rangers doesn’t give me any indication we could be them as well. I’m with Icebat… without our secret weapons Federov and 2008-09 Matt Bradley, I’m eerily fearful of the Rangers right now. If only we could bequeath them our home ice advantage… they’re a lot more terrible at home.
"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak
Nice post and legwork....
but as I’ve said before and I’ll say it again.
Who cares who we play? If we can’t beat any of them in any given round, we don’t deserve the Cup.
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 8, 2011 11:24 AM EDT reply actions
Well… matchups matter. For example, if you’re going to make a long playoff run, you need to stay healthy, so you’d want a less-physical team early on or even more importantly the team that you feel gives the Caps the best chance at a quick series (enough of these seven-gamers already!).
Sure, the Caps can beat (or lose to) anyone, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have preferences as to which “anyone” they face.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
People care. People care so much I’ve been posting the daily match-ups since March 1. Maybe you don’t’ care, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that potential match-ups are a rather popular topic.
And I quite enjoy seeing all this info in one place, rather than having to go and track it all down myself.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
And may I add that I’ve looked forward to your daily update on the match-ups all month long, RB!
"I remembered when he said that and I kind of looked at him during the warm up and told myself that I got to shut these guys out tonight." - Michal Neuvirth, 02.06.11.
thanks! I keep posting them because you guys keep chatting about them.
and may I say, I look forward to seeing your sig each day :)
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
I enjoy looking at them as well. It’s intriguing to see how things might shake out.
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 8, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d love to see the numbers over the last month or two. Not sure how much season-long totals matter at this point.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Last 35 games would be nice. I’m wondering if Mr Greenberg has that data in a spreadsheet, because I don’t know how to get that data even by poring over game logs?
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I do but don’t have access to my SQL server at my “real job,” but can check later.
Blogger for Russian Machine Never Breaks (RMNB) and WaPo's Capitals Insider
I also log the Caps scoring chances for 2010-11. The summary spreadsheet is posted on Google Docs.
Follow me on Twitter @ngreenberg
You should toss a nice Rails front-end on there and expose #fancystats to the whole world. www.fancystats.com would be next to CapGeek in everyone’s frequently visited sites.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Unless some 300lb biker named Fancy has a tattoo parlor and has already taken the domain…
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Go to btn search for recent comments by vic ferrari…theres a player shot script he updated. You can look up the relevant game numbers easily enough.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Fenwick For/gm, Fenwick Against/gm (total) since Feb 27 (roughly game 20932):
Buffalo: 36.3, 35.4 (50.6%)
NYR: 32.3, 33.2 (49.3%)
CAR: 35.2, 38.3 (47.9%)
Washington: 35.8, 33.2 (51.9%)
(score tied)
Buffalo: 57.4%
NYR: 47.5%
CAR: 47%
Washington: 53.1% —>now that’s what I’m talking about.
Here’s a quick glance at NYR’s team Corsi by game…looks inconsistent.
Schedule probably plays into this too, given how few games we’re looking at. I’ll post a look at the opponents shortly.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sweet. Sample size is a little small – according th shrpsports.com, we’d need to go back to Jan 18 to get the final 35 games of the season.
However, those numbers start to tell the story. Buffalo looks like they are to be avoided, and Carolina looks like a good draw.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I was just going for trade deadline. The Caps got a lot better with the three acquisitions, especially Wideman, it seems.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Sabres: @Rangers, @Canes, @Flyers, @Wild, @Pens, @Bs, @Leafs, Sens, Canes, Thrashers, Preds, @Habs, Cats, Devils, @Leafs, Rangers, @Caps, @Canes, Bolts
Rangers: Bolts, Sabres, Wild, @Sens, Flyers, @Ducks, @Sharks, Isles, Habs, @Pens, Cats, Sens, @Bs, @Sabres, @Isles, @Flyers, Bruins, Thrashers
Canes: Cats, Sabres, @Hawks, Thrash, @Caps, Jackets, @Sabres, Leafs, Isles, Sens, @Bolts, Bolts, @Caps, Habs, @Isles, Sabres, Wings
Caps: Isles, Blues, @Panthers, @Bolts, Oil, Canes, Hawks, @Habs, @Wings, @Devils, @Flyers, @Sens, @Habs, Canes, Jackets, Sabres, @Leafs, Panthers
For what it’s worth, in terms of these possession metrics, if you had to group the opponents into three classes (each class with ~ten teams):
Good teams: Hawks, Nucks, Flyers, Pens, Habs, Wings, Bolts, Devils, Predators, Flames, Sharks
Okay teams: Blues, Kings, Jackets, Bruins, Coyotes, Isles, Panthers, Sabres, Caps, Thrashers
Poor teams: Sens, Ducks, Avs, Isles, Canes, Stars, Leafs, Wild, Oilers
Just using Objective NHL’s Fenwick% score tied numbers for that. Cutoff between good and okay is 52%, okay to poor 48%.
Breakdown, good-okay-poor teams faced, followed by home-road:
BUF: 6-6-7, 8-11
NYR: 6-6-6, 10-8
CAR: 5-8-4, 11-6
WSH: 7-5-6, 9-9
I think I counted right.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
So you’re saying that we might be a better team thatn BUF, NYR, or CAR? Hope you’re right.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Don’t know about Buffalo, but I think this team is better than NYR, and better than Carolina by a longshot.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Carolina by a longshot?
What this post mostly neglects is past playoff performance and coaching staff. All 4 potential opponents have key players (i.e. goalies) or head coaches that have made it farther in the playoffs than the Caps in the past 5 years alone. The Canes will almost always be a dangerous matchup in the playoffs because they play as a team and play with their hearts on their sleeves. The last 3 times the Canes made the playoffs? Stanley Cup Finals, Stanley Cup Championship, EC Finals. The fans, the community, everyone comes together with a humble expectation for success and a subtle confidence in pulling the surprise.
Like a typical Caps fan, your short-sighted nature over emphasizes regular season performance which has been the Caps downfall the past 4 playoff seasons. It’s amazing that most Caps fans still don’t respect lower seeds and their ability to pull it together when it counts the most.
For your own sakes, I hope the team at least changes its attitude this year so you too can taste the sweet nectar of playoff success…
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
So the fact that the ‘10-’11 Caps beat the ‘10-’11 ‘Canes 5 of 6 has no impact on how likely the ’10-’11 Caps are to beat the ‘10-’11 Canes?
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Did you know? All but one of the six games between the Caps and ’Canes was a one-goal affair, and in all but one of the six games the winning team scored (or “scored” via the shootout) three goals.
every game was hard fought…most coulda gone either way. so maybe some impact, but not as much as the typical snobbery of a caps fan would expect
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think it’s Caps-fan-snobbery saying the Caps are a better team than the Canes. I think it’s objectivity. It wouldn’t be snobbery for Canucks fans to say they are a better team than the Stars, either.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
it’s not a matter of who is better. The Caps are definitely more skilled. it’s a matter of the EASE at which Caps fans think their teams will slice through lower seeds EVERY YEAR. and EVERY YEAR they get surprised…all i’m saying is learn a lesson & some humility
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I see plenty in this thread where people say a series with x or y wouldn’t be easy, seeding aside. This particular analysis said that the Caps would win this particular matchup. No playoff series is easy, and that’s why they play the games, but it’s not crazy to say that the Caps should beat the ’Canes in 5 or 6.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
And I’m not sure where you’re getting “every year” from. Both the Penguins in ‘08-’09 and the Flyers in ‘07-’08 had better records than the Caps, so neither of those was a problem of overlooking a lower seed.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Whoops. Retract the ‘08-’09. But I still think the Pens team was better (obviously, they won the cup) and I don’t think it was the Caps hubris that brought that team down, but the worse team tiring out.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
ya that year was definitely an even matchup & that awesome series coulda gone either way…retract EVERY :-)
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions
The loss is easier to stomach if I remember the Caps as the underdogs.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Meh. Pittsburgh’s overall point totals were depressed by the early-going shitshow under Therien. Pitt was a damned good team.
Who, I should point out, abused the snot out of the Canes in the ECF after the Caps took them to 7.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
how do you think us Canes fans survive?
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Every year? Like that entire period when we were in the basement? Or the year we expected to lose to PHI?
So by EVERY YEAR you mean last year and the year before. Gotcha.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
by Rob Parker on Apr 8, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Tell that to Fenwick%.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Playoffs or not, history is on the Caps’ side. Better team with more depth offensively and defensively. CAR can do well in the playoffs — and I’d expect them to play well in a WAS-CAR series, but heart can’t get your third line scoring.
Dingos are involved. Best not to ask.
by alex_k on Apr 8, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
ya Caps definitely have the Canes beat on the 3rd line and probably 4th line too…playoff experience is really only strong on the Canes top 2 lines so that may even it out in the end
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Experience only goes so far. I still think the ’Nucks are the favorites despite the franchise never having won it before.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
meh…look at the Canucks division. Let that remind you of 08-09, 09-10 Caps. not much competition there. The rest of the WC is battle-ready so the Canucks should be weary like the Caps should have been…
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Teams play 24 division games. Teams play 40 non-division games in their conference. I don’t think the weak division argument holds any water.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I hope the team at least changes its attitude this year
What attitude needs changing?
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Um, duh, you need subtle confidence. And your heart on your sleeve.
No one can win without that.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I don’t deny that last year’s Caps were chasing the wrong things, especially at the end of the regular season (individual milestones, etc.), but that doesn’t change the fact that Washington was the better team than Montreal. The better team doesn’t always win, and there may be a reason for that, but ask around at fanbases not WSH or CAR which of the two teams is better, and you wouldn’t get a whole lot of CAR in response.
That’s not to say that the Caps couldn’t choke, but I take no offense to the comment that the team who has beaten the other 5/6 and is better in almost every metric is better by a longshot.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
which is why the Caps have failed in the past few playoffs. i sense a change in the players’ attitudes this year…maybe the Olympics woke up Ovie
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
So why didn’t Carolina win the Cup the last three years, if they have all this heart?
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
cuz they couldn’t make the freakin playoffs :-( when they’re in though…they make it count…with heart, of course
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Right. So you can have all the heart in the world, sometimes other teams are better (sometimes even eight of them). I don’t think it’s wrong to point that out, or to acknowledge that upsets happen, but they’re not the norm.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
again it’s only natural to point out that certain teams are better based on regular season performance. but please review some of your cohorts comments above about how easy these potential matchups are gonna be. heart is what helped the canadiens make that incredible come back last year…it’s not just a carolina-thing.
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Nothing against the heart argument, but I think the Canadiens beat the Caps last year because of a fantastic* defensive system with a very good D to back it up and a phenom in G.
*fantastic=fantastic against the Caps’ run-and-gun system.
They were a fatal match for us.
by capsfan4 on Apr 8, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
a fatal match up after the Caps had completely dominated games 2-4 scoring 17 goals? do you really wanna remember those horrible memories? u don’t remember how confident every got that the canadiens were truly playing like an 8 seed and game 1 was just a fluke?
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Your argument is basically boiling down to “never have any confidence in your team.” That’s a silly argument.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I was referring to systems. Systemically, it was a fatal match-up. I still maintain that. Also, I haven’t lived in DC for a few years and didn’t comment on the rink until recently…so I can’t really comment on whether or not everyone was confident.
The discussion in which many were, in fact, not, has already been linked to upthread (or downthread, or wherever the hell it is now).
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The #1 seed is 23-9 against the 8 seed since 1994. It is not unreasonable to expect the 1 seed to handle the 8 seed.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
nope not unreasonable just ridiculous that regular contributors to this blog think that the Caps are better than the Canes “by a longshot”
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
All the stats back up that assertion. Some nebulous attribution to “heart” backs up yours.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
playoff history & coaching achievement is not nebulous…that was the bulk of my argument
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
So do you also think the Stars/Hawks will beat the Canucks?
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
by SmallZ827 on Apr 8, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
The Canucks should be very nervous for a match up with the defending champions…yes. There’s plenty of articles out there already discussing this.
by tarheelicane9 on Apr 8, 2011 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
How did that Chicago team win their Cup after so many years of playoff failure, then? They weren’t the defending champions last year. If your argument made any sense, the Devils wouldn’t be out of the playoffs and there wouldn’t be five cupless teams ready to make noise out west.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
What, exactly, does playoff history have to do with this? You think the Islanders are going to win the Cup this year?
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
by Rob Parker on Apr 8, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I think tarheel was referring to the relatively recent Carolina Stanley Cup and the fact that there are still members from that team playing rather than a franchise’s storied history.
And even that is spurious. They’ve lost more than they’ve retained, including the leadership core of the team. Lots of teams lost a bunch and then won. Previous playoff success or failure isn’t really indicative of much, other than previous playoff success or failure.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
about how easy these potential matchups are gonna be.
No one said easy. We all realize that Edmonton could upset Vancouver in a playoff series (well, maybe not, but you get the point, I think). That being said, some are easier than others, and there’s no reason for me to believe that Carolina is anywhere near as good as Montreal, Buffalo, or New York.
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
by red army line on Apr 8, 2011 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions
And the first salvo is fired. It’s on, boys.
So, lemme get this straight. The Canes will be a dangerous matchup because of: past playoff performance; coaching staff; the fact that they ‘play as a team’; the fact they play ‘with their hearts on their sleeves’ (whatever that means); community purpose; humble expectation for success and a subtle confidence.
Riiiiiiiiiight. You keep on thinkin’ that way, pardner.
The Canes’ hopes rest on precisely one guy, and that’s Cam Ward. If he can put up a .950 or so save percentage, they have a chance. Otherwise, it’s over.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
by fat_daddyo on Apr 8, 2011 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice work.
Buffalo still looks like the best team overall, and the one I’d want to avoid. Carolina looks like the worst.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
NYR and CAR have similar numbers, and a lot of NYR’s numbers there include Callahan, so they may very well be a wash. I feel good (gulp) about our chances against either.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Check out CAR’s overall Fenwich %, though. Significantly worse.
But, yeah, Callahan counts for something. I’m with you, either way, Caps are big favorites.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
CAR’s overall Fenwich
I’m suddenly hungry, and I don’t know why.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Fenwich, closely related Corso d’oeuvres.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
by fat_daddyo on Apr 8, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Marco makes the greatest faces. Had to use it here. :)
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
is this the last year of his contract, or are we in for a full season of The Many Faces of Marco?
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
If he ended up being a playoff hero, it would make for a great human interest piece. Guy goes from having a few seasons of very respectable numbers with the Bruins, gets hurt and finds himself the odd man out when he gets healthy, gets sent to the Kings for a three-pack of pucks. Kings waive him and he’s picked up by the Caps for nothing…
Up to Marco to finish the story… I’m hoping for a happy ending.
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
fires the shot that Knuble pokes in on the rebound in game 7 OT? talk about storybook endings for those guys.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
and throw in that he was once upon a time one of the players traded from the Sharks to the Bruins for Thornton…
hmmm…..so, out East, the Caps and Buffalo are the only playoff teams without Cups. But out West, I’m counting 5 teams without a title. if the Caps could top one of the other historic chokers…..one hell of a story, no matter who pots the winner.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Please. This story is pretty, except for the game 7 part. OT is fine, but let’s make it game 5.
Don’t try to figure Sasha out. Just ride the wave.
please. what team have you mean watching? :) game 7. multiple OT. and somehow McCreary will have to come in as an emergency ref replacement.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
And if it’s vs Buffalo, McCreary can still tackle ShaMo.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not really too scared of any of those teams. Not like I was of MON last year when we had this discussion. I’m on the same track as Gouldie with respect to the Rags; they got lucky in catching us at the right (wrong?) time. Hank is already banged up and Callahan is gone. I dont’ fear them.
CAR, despite our record, is probably the one I’d least like to face. For one, they are going to be the hottest of the teams if they make it. For two, they always play us tough. And for three, when they actually make the playoffs they tend to do serious damage. A real boom or bust squad. Although, maybe Eric Staal will thank us for singlehandedly getting him on the Canadian Olympic team and take it easy on us. My guess is that he’ll only “take it easy” when he senses a ref’s arm might go in the air. Strong as a bear… when he wants to be.
I do have to say, posting Varly’s “career” numbers against MON without including the 6 games last year is quite a bit misleading. I know only the regular season stats count as official, but from a realistic fan-based perspective, you kind of have to include last season’s debacle, no?
Weird Buffalo team this year. Not as sound defensively, top ten (at last check, probably at least still near top 10) offense, and Ryan Miller isn’t sniffing the Vezina discussion. I’d still harbor more than a little concern against them, but I don’t think they are too frightening.
As has been said a million times, the Caps could beat or lose to every one of those teams. I’m of the mind that the way the Caps play is by far more important than who they play.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
The only one I would consider his fault last year was Game 6 (4-1L). Overall he was 3-3, 2.41, .908%. Which isn’t stellar, but if the Caps score 1 more goal, we’re not talking about it at all.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m just saying it’s part of the picture.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Definitely part of the picture – we’re adding ’em to the post.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Added. Past tense.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
And for those interested, here are Varly’s true career numbers, regular season and playoffs combined:
6-3-1, sv% of 0.950, GAA of 2.01, one shutout (and that includes a record of 4-1-0, sv% of .924, GAA of 2.18 in Montreal)
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Not sure if that was a c/p error, but how did it go from:
3-0-1, 1.45 GAA, 0.950 save % career vs. Montreal; 3-3, 2.41GAA, 0.908 save % in the playoffs
to .950% overall? I don’t have the game logs in front of me but reg season sample size isn’t big enough for the .908% to not move it a bit, right?
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
The 3-0-1, .950 is regular season; .908 is in the playoffs.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
I think he’s asking how the two combined average out to his regular season numbers. Shouldn’t the .908 bring that .950 down just a bit?
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
The first numbers are this season, second are career regular season, third are career playoffs, no?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
This season: 0.96 GAA, 0.968 save % and one shutout in 2 games
Career regular season: 3-0-1, 1.45 GAA, 0.950 save %
Playoffs: 3-3, 2.41GAA, 0.908 save % in the playoffs
Career regular season + playoffs: 6-3-1, sv% of 0.950, GAA of 2.01, one shutout
…that clearer?
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
here are Varly’s true career numbers, regular season and playoffs combined:
That’s what I’m going off of. Looks like she is giving us the aggregated playoff and regular season combined. Unless the playoff shot totals are tiny, shouldn’t that .908 bring his regular season .950 down a bit? He didn’t face a ton of shots in the playoffs, but his regular season sample is also small enough that his aggregate Sv% should land somewhere between .908 – .950, unless I’m reading that sentence wrong.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Hang on. It’s very possible that with 3402389 numbers on my spreadsheet I did it wrong. Give me a few minutes, I’ll double-check.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Reg Season Sv% = 0.95
Reg Season GAA = 1.45
Playoff Sv% = 0.908
Playoff GAA = 2.41
Combined Sv % = 0.927
Combined GAA = 2.01
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
by Becca H on Apr 8, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks Becca.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Right. Even assuming arbitrarily that he played all 60 minutes of every appearance for which he received a decision (incorrect, I know), that would be 4 regular season games at .950 and 6 postseason games at .908.
(4×.950 + 6×.908)/10 = .925%
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Er, minutes assumption would be for GAA, nvm.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Unless he faced significantly more or significantly fewer shots in one sample, the number’s going to be somewhere around there.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Yeah I meant to type “shot quantity” (not quality) instead of “minutes played”.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Gotcha; don’t disagree.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Agree 100% that Carolina is the most dangerous of the group. Playing well at the right time, and being a division opponent, they know us very well. And while Lundqvist and Miller are all-world, Cam Ward is the only goalie of the group with a Stanley Cup to his name. Do not want.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Although Ryan Miller has plenty of big game success. Two ECF appearances, the Silver medal. He played CAR in the ECF and if his D Corps hadn’t been destroyed (Jeff Jillson had to play) then he may have been the one to win the Cup.
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Indeed, Miller is plenty accomplished.
Not to say anything bad about Miller or Lundqvist… Just that Ward should be seen as plenty dangerous in his own right(Conn Smythe), and their skaters have waaaaaaay more playoff experience than ours do.
Plus, if the hockey gods do hate us, and the Caps tank it and have a first round exit(clapclapclap), which team would be the most humiliating to have lost to? Carolina.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
You Missed The Most Dangerous Potential Enemy
WASHINGTON CAPITALS
107 pts; 1st in East with 1 game remaining
50% chance of 1st, 50% chance of 2nd, 100% chance of doesn’t matter
Season Series: Many battles won, many lost
Key Players:
Alex Semin: Cyclical like the stock market
Bruce Boudreau: Career high +17 SA/60 (strategic adjustments per 60 mins) this year
Demons: Will place 5000 pound gorillas on the Caps’ backs next Wednesday.
Law of Averages: 37 years without a championship + unlucky PP vs. overachieving PK
Testicular Fortitude: Comeback abilities strong; can they withstand the opposition pushback though?
Did you know? Capitals hockey is 50% mental, 30% Alex Ovechkin and 70% neutral-zone trap?
Why Caps fans should fear this matchup: See, e.g., every goddamned playoffs the Caps have ever participated in.
Why Caps fans shouldn’t fear this matchup: The pieces are in place. This is arguably the most playoff-ready a Caps team has ever been.
The keyboard is mightier.
by breed16 on Apr 8, 2011 11:54 AM EDT reply actions 31 recs
If Ted ever sells the caps, I imagine Pfizer would buy them. Caps fan base has to be the biggest bloc purchaser of Zoloft.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
___
Reminds me a bit of today’s XKCD:

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Well played
Blogger for Russian Machine Never Breaks (RMNB) and WaPo's Capitals Insider
I also log the Caps scoring chances for 2010-11. The summary spreadsheet is posted on Google Docs.
Follow me on Twitter @ngreenberg
Know what’s more than a little bit delicious that people (here at least, probably not in Raleigh) might be forgetting?
Remember Caps/Canes on March 11? Here’s what I wrote in the Recap:
The Caps were the beneficiaries of a quick whistle late in the game a few moments before Carolina put the puck into the Washington net. But let’s be clear about one thing – the Caps on the ice quit playing on the whistle, as every kid on the planet is taught to do. The whistle didn’t necessarily cost the ’Canes a goal.
No, the whistle didn’t necessarily cost the ’Canes a goal. But it probably did. And with it, at least one point, maybe two.
Wonder if they’d like to have that point or two right now…
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Hard not to smile at that one. I know I’m indulging my spiteful side, but that would just be great if that one goal could really cost CAR. Add in that Friday game in NJD that effectively ended their push for the playoffs…
First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!
Really, if Carolina misses the playoffs, they’ll need to look no further than their season against the Caps as to why.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
If I wasn’t at work I’d post the Cartman “sweet sweet tears” picture.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
You called, I answered

Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! My-ymmuy.
Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems. - Homer Simpson
by jaytown99 on Apr 8, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
From most want to least want I’d say:
Montreal-for all the obvious reasons; least physical, better matchups, weak defensive corp and, most of all, revenge
Rangers- no Callahan (huge), a maybe banged up Lundqvist, low-scoring team and the 7-0 and 6-0 humiliations to atone for
Carolina- not a big fan of playing intra-division rivals with very good goalies, but they don’t have a ton of depth on the forward lines, their defense is just OK and they do have Corvo. Still, they’re not a team I’d prefer to play because they skate hard and it would be a physical series. And they’ve got a Ruutu.
Buffalo- the team I least want to see. Ryan Miller could easily steal a series, they’re forwards are fast and can score, they’re defense can be imposing. Last but not least, their cockroach like fans will find a way to invade the dark recesses of Verizon with their “Let’s go Buffalo” chants. Still, it’s a series the Caps should win in 5 games, 6 tops.
I don’t understand how a city so small travels so numerously.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
they don’t travel. Like Detroit and Pittsburgh, half of Buffalo lives in the DC area.
although, one of their cockroach like fans is un-cockroach like. He brought me a Backstrom bobblehead from Saturday’s game.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Exactly. While there have been buses making the trip so some do travel, as well, there is a huge population of Buffalo area natives in the DC area (like the other 2 cities mentioned.)
In addition, there are quite a number of Caps STHs who switch to Buffalo jerseys (and some do it with Detroit) when their team comes to town. Personally, I don’t get the switching jerseys part, but that’s the case.
I don’t know. If I had to move to, say, Phoenix, I could definitely see supporting the ‘Yotes and getting a Doan jersey…but I’d definitely still rock my Caps gear when they came to town.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
The other thing is that pretty much no one who lives in DC is from DC. (Except me, and I don’t live there anymore :( )
So, why not adopt the Caps but still support the hometown team when they are in the arena?
(and yes, I am aware that 20 people who were born in DC are about to prove me wrong.)
Even this local-bred can’t deny it’s a town of transients.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
I was raised rooting for another team. I would choose to wear something other than a jersey supporting either team before I would choose wearing the home team jersey (if I was still a fan of that team, which I’m not.)
I know many people who believe you never switch your allegiance regardless of what games you attend. I understand switching allegiances although in my case it had nothing to do with sports (it’s a long story.)
Anyway, just seems weird to me that some people can go back and forth. As I noted above, I might have a rooting interest and like both teams, but I don’t think I could switch back and forth in terms of jersey wearing fandom.
Born in Sibley, but still can’t prove you wrong. Not many born and bred locals around here. My parents were from elsewhere but met at AU, and my wife is from elsewhere but came here for a job.
But my daughter was born in our Tenleytown bedroom!
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
hippie!
funny thing, me and my borthers are townies, and yet I’m the only Caps fan. The boys followed mom’s lead and cheer for the bruins.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
hippie!
More like open-minded. A healthy pregnancy is not a medical emergency!
Your mom and bros have had quite a cup drought themselves. Going on 40 years now. Here’s to hoping you celebrate one before they do. And that Tim Thomas turns into a pumpkin in the 1st round.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m joking about the hippie thing :) you should see me trying to convince my other half that there’s no need for a hospital….(btw, okay if I e-mail you about it?)
mom and the bros have that strange Boston sense of entitlement that keeps them going. “WHAT?! you didn’t just hand us the Cup/World Series/Super Bowl because we’re Boston?!?! FOR SHAME!” I think if they actually stopped to think about that Cup drought, never mind last season’s collapse, they’d all become unbearably depressed.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
As much as we want our match-up in round 1 favorable, wouldn’t we want the match-ups for the other top teams tough? Think about it for a second. Right now it looks like we will play either the Rags or Canes baring something amazing happening. So That would probably leave PHI-BUF, BOS-MTL and PIT-TBL.
Let’s say the Caps get through round 1 as the top seed (knock on wood). Look at what else could happen. Montreal is clearly capable of beating Boston in a series, and Buffalo can beat Philadelphia as well. If one of those happens, the Caps would play them in round 2.
All I’m saying here is that as much as we want to figure out a way to fidn the best match-up for us, shouldn’t we also try to make the lives of other teams miserable too?
Well, you go into the playoffs assuming it’ll get harder after the first round – all the Caps can do is hope for the best possible match-up to start and perhaps a little luck along the way. Right now there’s maybe two teams in the East that I’d consider an “easy” out, and that’s a relative term, but I also think if things go the right way the Caps can beat any team in the East. Best to worry about our own match-up now and whatever comes after, comes after.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Absolutely, but wouldn’t you want to see Boston and Montreal best up on each other for a full 6 or 7 games and have Ryan Miller maybe steal a series in Philly?
That said, bring on the Canes.
Oh, for sure. And I think the Caps could take either of those teams if they got out of the first round – just saying we deal with our own stuff first (and get out of the first goddamn round already, come ON, Caps!!) and then worry about the rest ;)
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
I can’t believe the 1st round is less than a week away… My stomach is already knotting up!
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
If the “Caps probably start on Wednesday” rumors are true, I’m happy. I’d hate to have to wait until Thursday or Friday to start a series; those extra days of anticipation would be killer.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
Okay, someone help me out because this came up in conversation the other day…was it the Flyers series 3 years ago that started on a Friday when everyone else in the League had already gotten underway?
I can’t remember which series it was but I remember the waiting was particularly brutal, which makes me think it was Philly because of the triumphant return to the playoffs.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
yep, that’s the one. We waited how many years to be back in the playoffs??? Those extra couple of days were just b-r-u-t-a-l. “But I want to watch the playoffs now!”
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
That’s what I thought. That was AWFUL. Waiting that long and then having to wait some more, all while the other 14 teams (…yes, I had to stop and think about the math there, wow) were like “haha, we’ve started already!”
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
those other 14 teams didn’t get what we got: A Donald Brashear Playoff Goal. fuck. yeah.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
by RedBirdie on Apr 8, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Holding out hope for a DJ King Playoff Goal. Except for the injuries that implies.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I can’t imagine if the Hawks finish 8th and have to face the Canucks, that would be classic. Either the defending champs or the Presidents trophy, super dominate Canucks gone after round one. The rest of the must be praying for this matchup.
Best to worry about our own match-up now and whatever comes after, comes after.
Been my mantra all this time….
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 8, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice write-ups to have all in one place. I am not big on worrying about the opponent, but in terms of looking at the series history for the season, something else that I believe is relevant is when the games were played during the respective season series and if any key players were missing from any of the games who will be available during the playoffs.
Agreed. And fear not, once our opponent is decided we’ll delve more into stuff like that because (as I always like to say) context is key.
For example, the Rangers handed the Caps their 2 worst losses of the year…that being said, one was during a particularly bad stretch and the other was the first game back from a long road trip. And neither featured the newest additions to the lineup.
The Canes beat the Caps in a shootout recently, but that was them playing desperate in a push for the playoffs against a Caps team that looked disinterested at times, as well as a team just getting Arnott and Ovi back into the lineup after a long layoff.
…that kind of stuff :P
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
my educated guesses about the outcomes of the series against the potential opponents
Based on how I’m guessing the momentum of the series will go:
Sabres:
Game 1: W (strong Caps win)
Game 2: W (less strong Caps win)
Game 3: L (Miller steals one)
Game 4: W (Caps squeak past Miller)
Game 5: L (Caps don’t play hard enough)
Game 6: W (They finish this bitch)
Canes:
Game 1: W (strong Caps win)
Game 2: W (Caps kick ass)
Game 3: W (clinch game with an EN)
Game 4: L (Canes wake up)
Game 5: W (Canes crumble, Caps finish this bitch)
Habs:
Game 1: W (1-goal game)
Game 2: W (another 1-goal game)
Game 3: L (Habs play the good game we know they’re capable of, Caps don’t)
Game 4: W (Caps win by several goals)
Game 5: L (Caps don’t come ready, get ambushed)
Game 6: W (Caps eek out series clincher)
Rags:
Game 1: L (Rags put forth a strong game and the Caps don’t open with what it takes to beat them)
Game 2: W (Caps decide to act like a 1-seed)
Game 3: W (Neuvy outplays Lundy)
Game 4: L (Lundy steals one)
Game 5: W (Rags don’t have what it takes to keep it up)
Game 6: W (they still don’t have what it takes, they bow out valiantly)
by j762 on Apr 8, 2011 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Something’s wrong. Not nearly enough “Game 7: L” on there.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
That’s the first step in a Game 7 L.
"Drive defensively" -Marge
"Sometimes the best defense is a good offense" -Homer
by Alz in the family on Apr 8, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’ll do a shot for defeatism.
"Drive defensively" -Marge
"Sometimes the best defense is a good offense" -Homer
by Alz in the family on Apr 8, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Can we get the final results of the poll last year on who the majority wanted to face in the 1st round? I feel like Montreal was #1.
Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems. - Homer Simpson
Jesus…I forgot I did that one. And that we were able to post it a month before playoffs – insane.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Olympic Break ended and we were all like “Yawn. call us when there is meaningful hockey.”
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
“But meantime, let’s get jazzed over individual stats and trophies!”
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
what else were we going to get jazzed over? bruce’s daily hagen daaz intake? Sloan’s NCC/60?
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
I suppose the team letting Ovie and others rest up a bit would’ve been worthing cheering. Water under the bridge now.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions
…this might be my favorite comment from that post:
MTL is 11th in PK…they’ve got good special teams.
I think they have the worst goaltending of those three teams though. – YvonLabresMustache
Good call, YLM ;)
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Ooh ooh or this one in reply:
I’d say a goalie would be enough to win a game or two, but against the Cap’s offense no way a goalie alone will take an entire series.
…sorry :P I don’t mean to make people look silly, but it’s a funny reminder of what a lot of people thought at the time.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
I reeeeeaaally don’t want a Caps-Habs playoff series either, trust me
- Becca H
This lady is a psychic genius. Becca, who do you like this time, I need to get some bets down soon?
Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems. - Homer Simpson
Becca had reasons other than “tough matchup for the Caps” to not want that series.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Truth. But it really was a little of both – I believe I said in a different comment on the same post that having watched the Habs as much as I did and having watched them against the Caps, they matched up better against the Caps than anyone else and seemed to play harder. I knew they would be a tough team to play (and I think in a different post I pointed out that Halak could go from ice cold to red hot in a second, which he did in our series).
So HA. It wasn’t all because I didn’t want my teams playing each other :P And the way you know that is this: I think the Habs would be the best draw for us this year and I’d love the Caps to play them. Ain’t gonna happen most likely, but I wish it would.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
So HA.
That made me smile.
Yeah, I’d love to see a revenge series against MTL this Spring. It could still happen in the 2nd round.
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, man…if only. That would mean three good things would have happened!
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Caps win 1st round, MTL wins 1st round, and Boston loses 1st round?
by Berube Doobie Doo on Apr 8, 2011 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Ooh, FOUR things! :P I was going for “Caps get to seek revenge against a team I think they can beat in the second round”, but the Habs winning is a good thing too.
Oh, dare to dream, kids…dare to dream.
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Heh. I forgot about lifetime caps fan and the “stop correcting people” discussion.
Also, given Boston’s performance last year, I’d say the wisdom of the crowd was pretty good. Be interesting to see how it shakes out this year.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
lifetime caps fan definitely gets my “golden banhammer.” What a riot/aggravation that guy was.
Also, I’m not surprised that we as a whole were generally right; if there’s one thing Caps fans can do, it’s predict that the team will let us down spectacularly.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
no no no, everyone here was adamant that Montreal was the team we wanted to NOT see.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
How’d the Canes play Washington 7 times and Washington only played Carolina 6?
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
…I can’t believe it took that long for someone to catch that. I certainly didn’t notice. Wow.
Thank you :)
Sunrise, sunset, swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.
Miller, Ward, Price, or Lundqvist.
Each one of them is capable of standing on their head for a series, so honestly none of these teams should be taken lightly. Thus, as it should be, the Caps success will depend on them playing their game well.
If forced to choose for the first round, I’d least like to face Miller the least, but would probably rather face the rest of the Sabres because they strike me as less of a chippy team than any of the other three. I’m not saying Buffalo lacks physical presence; I’m just saying they feel like they play a cleaner game than the others, which would aid the Caps long term playoff aspirations.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Anyone but the Rags
Going up against a team in the playoffs that owned them during the regular season worries me quite a bit. I didn’t want Montreal last year, I don’t want NY this year.
As for goalies, I’m not concerned (Thomas is the only one to fear this year in the east), because, as King Hendrick said, there’s no secret; just go to the net.
If it works out that the Caps face the Rangers, I hope to eat crow. Large mouthfuls of crow.
(on a side not- too bad crow tastes so bad, becuase there sure are an awful lot of them…)
The Way is riddled with deep, dark holes.
If Pittsburgh beats the Isles tonight, then Tampa is locked into 5th.
Tampa will then have less incentive in its game against Carolina, perhaps even resting players.
I’d much rather see Carolina than the Rangers.
So as painful as it is, I will hope the Pens win tonight, though doing so in a highly truculent matchup with many heavy hits.
If PIT beats NYI (likely), and PHI loses to BUF (also likely), that means PIT takes the #2 spot…Given top seeds winning out (somewhat likely,) that means that we face PHI in the 2nd round (and, yes, that means a healthy Pronger is back)….so if you wanted a reason not to cheer for PIT, there it is!
Yes, we all were worriedly searching for a reason not to cheer for PIT. New here?
/snark
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha! Point taken. And yes, I am new to commenting, although I’ve been reading for a few years.
What I meant to say, is that I don’t want PIT to leapfrog PHI. I think the Pens would be a better match-up for the Caps in the 2nd round.
I agree with both pieces of this. I would love PHI losing first round and I think PIT is going to be the clown hole from Happy Gilmore that has defeated us constantly in the past but that we will finally overcome.
"Inglewood Jack! Inglewood Jack!" - Coach Jules
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Apr 8, 2011 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions







































