The 411 on the 1-3-1
Much has been made of Guy Boucher's implementation of a 1-3-1 neutral zone checking scheme. Below the jump I'll explain how the 1-3-1 works, why the Bolts use it, how they've used it against the Caps, and how to beat it.
Before the jump, I'd like to acknowledge the work of Fehr and Balanced, who provided all of the videos for this FanPost as well as numerous content suggestions and edits. Any errors are my own.
The Tampa Bay Lightning had quite the offseason: a new general manager, some shiny new players like Simon Gagne and Brett Clark, and a dashing young coach with a Prussian dueling scar and a new-fangled neutral zone checking scheme, the 1-3-1.
At its most basic, the 1-3-1 is a variant of the neutral zone trap. A typical trap uses one forechecker to mark the puck, then two forwards behind the blueline backed up by the two defensemen near the redline. By contrast, the 1-3-1 has one forechecker marking the puck, two forwards and one defenseman playing three abreast in the neutral zone backed up by one defenseman who hangs back and plays a bit like a sweeper in soccer or a free safety in football. The purpose of the first forechecker is to take away the center of the ice and funnel the play toward the boards. Once the puck goes to the boards, the three skaters at center ice cut off passing and skating lanes and ideally either create a turnover or force a weak dump-in without speed. The trap is designed to make it difficult to skate or pass through the center of the ice - the 1-3-1 all but completely takes the center of the ice away if played correctly.
The Lightning employ the 1-3-1 because, to be frank, their defensemen aren't particularly quick. Playing the 1-3-1 properly can effectively bring the play to a halt at center ice and mitigate the lack of mobility evinced by players like Matthias Ohlund, Brett Clark and Pavel Kubina. (Keep this in mind when it comes time to discuss how to beat the 1-3-1.)
Despite this, the Lightning aren't a typical "trapping" team like the New Jersey Devils. They actually employ a rather aggressive forechecking scheme at times. Much like the Caps, they fall back to neutral ice when the opposition has uncontested control of the puck in their own end (i.e., during a Tampa Bay line change), or when they've got a lead that they're looking to protect.
The game between the Capitals and Lightning on January 12th, 2011, which the Lightning won 3-0, provides a good example of how the Lightning used the 1-3-1 to stymie the Caps. The following series of play occurred around seven minutes into the game after the Lightning had scored to go up 1-0.
In the following diagrams, all Caps players and actions are denoted in red and all Lightning players and actions are denoted in blue. Solid arrows mean skating, while dotted arrows mean passes and mixed arrows mean "potential choices." Players are denoted by their jersey number.
In the first frame, the Lightning have dumped the puck into the Caps' zone and both teams are changing up behind the play, so the Caps have a controlled breakout from behind the net. Karl Alzner waits for Nicklas Backstrom to curl back before passing to him. Ryan Malone is waiting in the high slot to funnel Backstrom to either the left or right boards, as represented by the shaded triangle.
In this image, we can see some of the choices facing Backstrom as he skates up the ice. He can continue up the boards, knowing that this is exactly what Malone is trying to force him to do. Or he can try a cross-ice pass to John Carlson, and he can see that's a turnover waiting to happen. Or he can take the safe and boring choice and dump the puck back to Alzner (off screen), but that's. . . safe and boring.
Backstrom chooses none of the above options. Instead he opts to skate the puck back toward center ice. Presumably, he's hoping to use his shiftiness to catch Malone out. Unfortunately for Backis, cutting back to center ice has robbed him of his momentum and slows the whole play down. Now players like Carlson are skating up ice much faster than Backstrom.
Now we begin to see the traffic jam caused by Backstrom's decision to slow down and skate the puck up. Alexander Ovechkin had been curling back to center ice to gain some speed and now he's right on top of Backstrom. Malone, Martin St Louis and Steven Stamkos have effectively cut off the center of the ice completely. This has left Mike Knuble and Carlson standing uselessly at the offensive blueline trying not to go offside. For the sake of reference, Ohlund's partner Mike Lundin has dropped so far back as as the second "1" in the 1-3-1 that he's off the screen to the left.
The area shaded in red is meant to show just how terrible a situation Backstrom is in. All of his options are in the red area, but so are three Lightning players. Two of his players have lost all their momentum, so they can't chase down a dump-in. Regardless, Backstrom is still about 10 feet from being able to dump the puck without icing anyhow. His one option with momentum, Ovechkin, has his back turned to him and would have to receive the puck on his backhand skating into a bunch of traffic. That's a recipe for a turnover at best or a concussion at worst.
Backstrom takes the one option seemingly left to him, which from the video appears to be an attempt at a bank pass off the boards to a streaking Ovechkin. Knuble and Carlson are just trying to stay onside. St Louis, Malone and Stamkos have everything marked with Ohlund and Lundin in reserve.
The end result is all too predictable - St Louis forces the turnover and is off to the races the other way. Fortunately, because the 1-3-1 has so many guys hanging back, and because Alzner played conservatively (off screen right) the Lightning don't score on the ensuing offensive zone possession. Nevertheless, it's not a good idea to give a team with the Lightning's firepower offensive zone possessions. After the turnover, the Bolts had a good twenty seconds of offensive zone possession against the Capitals' top-line, thereby negating an entire shift for Backstrom, Ovechkin and Knuble. Here's a video of the whole sequence:
So now that we've seen how it works, how can the Caps beat it?
Generally speaking there are two methods to beat this sort of neutral zone scheme: either by pushing the pace quickly or through patient puck movement. In both cases, gaining speed through the neutral zone and getting around the "3" of the 1-3-1 is key. First we'll look at the agressive speed variation.
One popular means of beating the 1-3-1 capitalizes on the post-lockout abolition of the two-line offside rule and tweaks to the icing rules to allow for dump-ins from the defensive zone. Essentially, the defenseman waits for two forwards to regroup and gather speed, while the third stays deep in the neutral zone on the far side of the redline. The defenseman blasts the puck at the deep forward right as the other two forwards hit the far blueline with speed. If the deep forward can deflect the puck, that's great. If he doesn't, as long as he makes an effort and appears like he was impeded from reaching the puck by a defenseman, icing is waved off. If the attacking forwards gain enough speed, they can always beat the deep "1" defenseman to the puck and negate the icing. For more on this method, see this great write-up in the Hockey Writers. The Caps have employed this method against the Bolts to gain the zone with some success against the 1-3-1.
Here, the Caps are regrouping in their own end, Backstrom and Jason Chimera have just curled back and are building speed. John Carlson passes D-to-D to his partner Karl Alnzer (off screen right). The forward "1" in Tampa's 1-3-1 checking scheme (Steven Stamkos) is just off screen left.
Alzner dumps the puck hard to the opposite corner and Ovechkin appears to slightly deflect the puck. As you can see, even though Stamkos is trying to take away the center of the ice, the Caps have still managed to get the puck through, albeit not with control. At the top left, Backstrom is streaking at full speed into the offensive zone to chase down the cross-ice dump-in.
The "3" in Tampa's 1-3-1 finally come into view (Ohlund, Downie and St Louis), but the hard dump-in by Alzner has simply bypassed them. Now the Tampa defensemen are in trouble. Neither Mike Lundin (39), nor Ohlund are particularly fleet of foot and they've got to do a back-to-front transition then beat Backstrom with a full head of steam to the puck. Chimera, meanwhile, is streaking to the front of the net 
This is the rather unsurprising result - Backstrom beats both Lundin and Ohlund to the puck and Chimera is all alone in front of the net. Ovechkin is off screen right. The Caps are perfectly set up for a good zone possession thanks to a hard dump-in with speed that rendered Tampa's 1-3-1 about as effective as the Maginot Line. Here's a video of the whole play:
The hard, two-zone dump-in isn't the only way to gain the zone with speed agains the 1-3-1. The puck carrier can also attack with speed and force the defense to collapse before dumping the puck and retrieving it himself. Here we see Brandon Dubinsky of the New York Rangers pushing the puck through the neutral zone with speed. As Tampa's "3" starts to collapse on him at the blueline, he dumps the puck in the corner and skates right by them to retrieve it. As was the case with Alzner's dump-in, the Tampa defensemen simply aren't fast enough (and Roloson isn't a good enough puckhandler) to beat the Rangers to the puck. The end result is a goal by Steve Eminger.
As alluded to earlier, pure speed is just one way to beat this scheme; patience with the puck can also break it down by forcing the forecheckers to leave their scheme, thereby opening up seams in which the attacking team can gain time and space, and along with them, speed.
In this image, the Lightning are set up in their standard 1-3-1 while the Caps are patiently regrouping. The Caps are so patient, in fact, that Tampa starts to break their scheme.
The Caps' patience forces Adam Hall (18) to pressure the puck. Mike Green just calmly passes over to Jeff Schultz, and Dana Tyrell (42) chases the puck, which means that the 1-3-1 is now an out of position 2-2-1. This leaves a huge gap on the right hand side of the rink and Matt Hendricks smartly fills it.
Schultz hits Hendricks with a pass and Hendricks will then turn and dump the puck in. Knuble (off screen left) and Marcus Johansson start attacking toward the offensive zone with speed. Nate Thompson (44), Pavel Kubina (13) and Matt Smaby (32, off screen left) are caught a bit flat-footed and have to scramble to catch up.
Kubina, Thompson and Smaby can't recover in time and Knuble and Hendricks win the puck in the corner. The whole sequence can be seen in the following video. Crucially, this technique will likely only work when the Caps have a lead, because if Tampa has a lead or the game is tied, the forwards won't feel the need to pressure the puck.
From the foregoing, some lessons emerge about how to beat the 1-3-1.
- Transition quickly out of the defensive zone - the Lightning can't choke off the neutral zone with the 1-3-1 if they don't have time to set it up. When the Caps' defensemen and centers get the puck down low in the neutral zone, they need to pick their heads up and make quick decisions.
- Speed through the neutral zone is key. Whether by skating it up or shooting it in, the puck needs to get by the "3" in the 1-3-1 with speed. Moreover, the players without the puck need to have speed through the neutral zone as well to assist with puck recovery.
- If it ain't there, don't force it. This is the big mistake Backstrom made in the first sequence. He didn't like what he saw, but instead of retreating and regrouping, he slowed the play down and continued to push it forward. This deprived the other Caps forwards of their momentum and bunched the play up at the blueline, leading to a turnover. The Caps need to learn from what Dubinsky in the third video - once the Lightning start to collapse, dump the puck in and chase it down - don't try to carry it or pass it through the mess of sticks and skates.
- Dump-ins should be hard and away from the keeper. Dwayne Roloson doesn't appear to be a great puckhandler, but most any NHL goaltender can stop the hard-around. Alzner's dump-in was perfect - hard and to the opposite corner so the goalie couldn't touch it.
Playing against this system puts a premium on players who can carry the puck through neutral ice with speed, get the puck in deep and chase it down. On the surface, it's seemingly tailor-made for Marcus Johansson. Mackan could gather the puck in the defensive zone, use a quick deke to blow by the first forechecker, gain the redline and dump the puck in. At that point, wingers like Jason Chimera, Marco Sturm, Mike Knuble or Brooks Laich could recover the puck and begin the cycle.
If the Caps can gain the zone with speed against the 1-3-1, cycle the puck, generate chances and begin to wear down Tampa's defensive corps (while simultaneously keeping Tampa's dangerous forwards hemmed in their own end), it would greatly increase the Caps' chances of victory in the series.
If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
93 comments
|
101 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It’s still not clear to me how the Lightning can generate so much offense in this scheme, whereas other trapping teams fail to do so (I realize they have a great PP). What are the costs on the team employing the 1-3-1? In earlier threads, people have mentioned that it wears the players down. But it’s not clear why they’d be doing more work in this scheme (if anything, it would seem their D-men at least are doing less skating).
Terrific post.
It is our most modestly priced receptacle.
by Rainbow, Kitty, Beer on Apr 29, 2011 3:24 AM EDT reply actions
Two reasons
First:
espite this, the Lightning aren’t a typical “trapping” team like the New Jersey Devils. They actually employ a rather aggressive forechecking scheme at times. Much like the Caps, they fall back to neutral ice when the opposition has uncontested control of the puck in their own end (i.e., during a Tampa Bay line change), or when they’ve got a lead that they’re looking to protect.
Second, many trapping teams employ the trap because they lack talented players. Clearly that’s not the case with TB, given guys like St Louis, Stamkos and Lecavalier. My personal theory is the Boucher uses it because it’s generally a good idea to prevent teams from having easy trips through neutral ice and because his defenseman are pretty slow as a unit.
Vendetta Red
And in addition the trap causes neutral zone turnovers, a lot. Even with the players so far back in the 1-3-1, a turnover against either of the top two lines is asking for an odd-man rush against.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Especially given that the Caps, for the most part, will be either standing still or skating up ice, with the Bolts heading the other way.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
when TB is behind, do they drop the 1-3-1 scheme and do something more aggressive?
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I caught the point about the forecheck in your piece, and that could explain TB. I’m just trying to figure out why it is more teams don’t do something like this. Is it just as simple as: the trap inhibits the trapping team’s offense? And if so, then it’s not entirely clear to me why that is, since it’s a strategy employed when you don’t have the puck, and it seems likely to get you the puck back more frequently.
It is our most modestly priced receptacle.
by Rainbow, Kitty, Beer on Apr 29, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
More dynamite stuff from Japers’ Rink Tech. A raise of the glass to the instructors.
Rooting for the Caps from the OBX.
by Acer Jonesy's Laughker on Apr 29, 2011 6:17 AM EDT reply actions
I want to take this FanPost to my unmarked van and give it an ether rag.
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
by Bald Pollack on Apr 29, 2011 7:27 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
If there was a man made of just this FanPost, I’d want to marry him.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
If the potential marriage between you and this fanpost replaced the Royal Wedding, I would watch it.
12 wins.
King of Nothingness
by Steck It Out on Apr 29, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Stick tap to Zephyr and Dimagus for helping me figure out how to capture the video.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
nice work if that’s your first go…
"We know the answers have to come from this room," Hendricks said. "They're in here."
Yeah it is. Forgive the extra space at the beginning of some of the clips. I’m still a hack at this.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
pretty awesome for a first crack
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Awesome brec’down of the TBL scheme, D’oh. One bellweather for this series will be the HHT PIMS the Caps earn. If the Caps are skating well and carrying the play vs that slow TBL defense, I would expect to see a lot of clutching and grabbing to minimize the Caps’ speed. Guys like Hendricks and Bradley have to show up in this series.
"We know the answers have to come from this room," Hendricks said. "They're in here."
don’t forget MoJo and Chimera. and well, pretty much everyone else has to show up. and play (showing up is not enough).
No passengers allowed!
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions
no doubt; I think MJ90 is going to play a huge role in this series. I specifically mentioned Hendy and Brads because zero points, 6 PIMS and a -4 from those two in round 1 is not going to cut it. Our bottom line players, as a group, have to step it up from their play vs. NYR.
"We know the answers have to come from this room," Hendricks said. "They're in here."
by bigonetimer on Apr 29, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Great breakdown — helps me to appreciate the strategies employed by various coaches.
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 8:39 AM EDT reply actions
Awesome stuff D’oh and F&B…this is great.
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism; to steal from many is research
Living in Canada you have plenty of access to this kind of stuff. Us poor Americans have to settle for TV commentators showing us why it’s bad to leave a man wide open in the slot.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
by Rob Parker on Apr 29, 2011 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions 9 recs
rec’d because I loled. True, unfortunately!
by HeartbreakRidge on Apr 29, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions
What, if any, other NHL teams employ the 1-3-1?
"I don't like hockey. I'm just good at it." - Brett Hull
"They say you're not a coach in the league till you've been fired. I must be getting pretty good." - Terry Simpson
None that I know of, which is why it gets so much interest. It’s exotic but after doing this I tend to think the attention is overblown. It’s a trap, the same principles apply for the most part.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Yeah, that’s pretty much my feeling as well. It’s an interesting variation of a trap – like someone mated the trap with the left wing lock – but it’s still just the trap. Keep speed through the neutral zone and don’t force the play when it’s not there.
Vendetta Red
Awesome post. The cartoon speech bubbles were crucial.
Formerly know as Laich It Or Lump It.
Don't follow me on twitter, because I don't have an account.
by Laich It Or Lump It on Apr 29, 2011 10:42 AM EDT reply actions
Fantastic illustration of the 1-3-1. I wish I could give each of you a rec – you deserve it.
This system is just begging for a 3rd line with Mackan and Chimera. Especially since they’ll likely be drawing the Bolts’ 3rd defensive pairing – Lundin and Kubina, presumably. I think the Caps will be ready for this system, judging from the last couple Caps-Bolts games.
Matt Bradley: He has sensitive skin, no?
When F&B and I were chatting last night, that was exactly our thoughts as well. Mackan will circle back and pick up speed with the puck, beat the “1” forechecker while Chimera is hauling ass through the neutral zone. As soon as Mackan hits the redline, he dumps the puck in and Chimera breezes past Lundin or whomever and retrieves the puck. Cycle, rinse, repeat.
Vendetta Red
I can see Fehr with those two being a danger to this system. Mackan dumps it in, Chimera blows past the dman and retrieves it, and then Mackan comes into the zone with Fehr trailing. That could easily set up a scoring chance for either Mackan or Fehr.
Matt Bradley: He has sensitive skin, no?
Nah, Fehr’s smart enough to be an asset to all that. You need someone to actually score once you break into the zone. Chimera or Johansson will get the puck. And Fehrsie will be ready to put it in. Or jump over to the boards and support.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Apr 29, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Also...
Thanks to Malin for the English to Swedish translation!
Vendetta Red
by D'ohboy on Apr 29, 2011 11:07 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
But where do the Red Rockers fit into all of this?
/There, I generated some discussion for you guys.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 29, 2011 12:18 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t think it was really needed, but this provides more support for keeping Schultz in instead of Erskine if Wideman comes back. If Tampa is going to be disciplined in playing this system the Caps need someone on the blueline who makes the smart and easy plays with the puck and is equally disciplined in their positioning, not someone bruising the TB forecheckers. That all screams Schultz over Erskine.
Another question that comes from this post is why Boucher prefers to use this system instead of the standard 1-2-2 trap. Three men across the neutral zone does cut down on the lateral movement needed to seal off the attack, which obviously supports the lack of mobility TB has on D. On the other hand, if the other team does break through with speed there is now just one slow-footed Dman back to retrieve the puck and you have three guys who have to turn and trail the forecheck instead of just two. Seems like there is more of a defensive risk. Any thoughts on why Boucher goes this route instead of the standard trap or the left wing lock?
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 29, 2011 12:39 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t know exactly why he goes with the 1-3-1, haven’t heard him say. But you are exactly right about what happens with the breakdown. We actually have a clip that was left on the cutting room floor of ANA scoring against the 1-3-1 because after they broke it TBL’s D was a mess. The back “1” had brutal gap control, he was on the face off dot when ANA gained the zone. Ryan hit the blueline with speed so the entire 3 man row turned to chase him and lost sight of the trailer, who Ryan hit all alone in the slot. We didn’t use it because it was more an example of the 1-3-1 failing itself, not really being broken down, but it does show how out of whack the gap control gets when the 1-3-1 isn’t set up properly. Part of the reason ANA was able to prevent the 1-3-1 from being set up right was because Lubo got the puck after the dump in and wasted no time bee-lining up ice. Once he passed the top 1 man, he passed the puck over to Ryan on his left. Nate Thompson tried to jump the pass and missed. If he picked it off, it’s a classic trap-turnover-breakaway. But because of how the spacing was messed up by Lubo’s quick decision-making, the Ducks ended up tying the game with about 4 to go in the third.
I like highlighting how Schultz fits this better than Erskine, but I never thought there was a situation where Erskine would be better suited.
I’ll ponder on why a coach might elect for the 1-3-1 over the 1-2-2, but off the top of my head nothing jumps out. Just seems a matter of preference.
Left wing lock is more aggressive than the trap or 1-3-1 so I’m not shocked he doesn’t use that. When TBL goes into the 1-3-1 it’s incredibly passive.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
It looks like the 1-3- allowed the Lightning to set up triple teams anywhere in the neutral zone. The 1-2-2 it’s a little harder to develop the triple team without distorting your structure. Think of the 3 man row as a foosball row and every time they get the puck carrier to commit to that side of the ice they have two guys that can play the puck carrier. Then they have the high 1 go to that side and you’re surrounded by 3 defensive players. Even if you have one man helping you, it’s 2 on 3. Trying to get 3 men in there just crowds the area too much and makes any sort of progress unworkable. I really liked that dump in JR showed after the first. Laich and Backstrom both curl the same direction with Backstrom on the outside route. Laich takes an inside path that blocks the ability of the 1 man from getting over to Nick and it bought Nick enough time to get to the redline. Don’t ask me about the third period…
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Outstanding work guys. In case you hadn’t seen it, Wyshynski just linked to this post in his Jacks Adams nominees post.
The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Associate Editor at Five For Howling.
by Carl Putnam on Apr 29, 2011 12:54 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
The fact that one of the examples shows a goal by Eminger is the cherry on top for me.
The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Associate Editor at Five For Howling.
Definitely thought that was pretty funny. I tried to find one of the Avs beating the 1-3-1 to satiate D’ohs Colorado-lust, but they didn’t cooperate. They beat the 1-3-1, but then spent over a minute on the cycle and my program won’t make clips longer than a minute so you couldn’t get the goal and the zone entry in the same video.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Wish I had read this before the VAN-NSH game last night. Does VAN use a 1-3-1? Their neutral zone was incredibly clogged up.
Life With Spidey -- a blog about sports, travel, work, family and fun.
Representing Caps fandom in the Gateway to the West.
I haven’t watched enough of them to say what they normally use, but I’ve never noticed them doing it and I’ve never heard anyone talk about them doing it.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Maybe the Preds were just that bad.
Life With Spidey -- a blog about sports, travel, work, family and fun.
Representing Caps fandom in the Gateway to the West.
It was a minor miracle (i.e. Rinne) that Nashville wasn’t blown out 5-0. Their play was horrendous.
by Charlie Foxtrot on Apr 29, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions
It looked to me like the Canucks were employing a strategy similar to what they were doing against the Hawks later in their series. They were definitely clogging the neutral zone, but I don’t believe it was a 1-3-1 as it seemed like they always had two d-men back. One thing is for sure, their forwards relentlessly pressure the puck.
I’m not a Canucks expert, but I don’t believe the they’ve have been doing that all season. I saw them live once and watched bits and pieces of a couple of other games and their style of play was more wide open.
The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Associate Editor at Five For Howling.
a similar question — pardon my ignorance, but what system do the Caps use?
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
uhm, what?
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Dboy did a fanshot illustrating the changes in the Caps’ D system a few months ago. if you look for it, you should find it
¡Estupendo!
You should be expecting a call from Locker to join the Network Hockey staff any minute now.
You also got a good chunk of quotage in Mirtle’s preview of the Caps/Lightning series.
Tortorella: Can I get another question? I went in here in a pretty good mood today, too.
Larry Brooks: So did I.
Tortorella: Well, you obviously f***ed that up, didn't you?
I guess the question is (and you talk about it a little), if/when you break the 1-3-1, are the scoring chances any better than a standard dump of the puck? I mean, can the other defenseman get back quick enough?
Also, do you think the 1-3-1 work better with a more mobile goaltender?
I think a trapping system in general works much better with a goalie who can play the puck (a la Brodeur) because even if the attackers get the puck deep and are coming with speed, the goalie can make up for the slower D and beat everyone to the puck and move it up ice. That benefit is moderated by the trapezoid obviously, but the trapezoid places a greater importance on dumping the puck into the opposite corner instead of just ripping it behind the net. You gotta put it where the goalie can’t help out the D playing the puck.
As far as the scoring chances go I think it largely depends on how much speed you have coming into the zone and the placement of the puck dump. If you can get to the puck quickly you have a chance of having a 2 on 1 play down low for a great scoring chance (like the Backstrom to Chimera play in one of the videos in the post). Even if you don’t necessarily have the D outnumbered, getting to the puck quickly can give you chances off the bat before the “3” can get into position in the D zone. If not your chances won’t be much different from a standard dump and chase and cycle down low.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 29, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice work D’oh, Fehr and Balanced, Zephyr, Dimagus, and Malin for the teamwork and collaboration. Awesome fanpost. Regret I only have one rec to give! Not to knock on Raw Charge, but the amount of excellent content available here from just the commentariat alone gives the RC editors a serious run for the money.
IIII
Thanks a lot for the post guys. I genuinely learned more about hockey.
Are there any modifications that Boucher could make to the 1-3-1 if he starts to see the Caps employ some of these counter-strategies?
Soon the Championship with be ours, all ours!
roll over and play dead?
...duhhh....what's a goal?
by RedskinFan4Life on Apr 29, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
JR is horning in our racket. Awesome. Another thing I noticed watching the video provided by Versus in the intermission was that it looks like Laich takes an angle that allowed him to run a bit of a pick and allow Backstrom to gain the red line. Well designed play.
Second Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap)
Interference without actually interfering is brilliant. Part of what makes the different flavors of the trap successful is that the forechecker, by means of his positioning, takes away options. He never has to actually make contact with the puck carrier to disrupt the breakout. If our guys can use positioning to disrupt their trap (by making them take a less desirable route to our puck carrier) it should give us a few more opportunities.
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
by iwearstripes on Apr 29, 2011 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions

by 












































