InGoal Magazines's analysis of the Christensen goal, at the heading Capitals Neuvirth caught in another VH gaffe
The VH technique was also criticized (though in somewhat comical fashion by announcers who mislabeled and clearly mis-understood it) after Neuvirth got caught using it by a perfect, water-bottle buckling, sharp-angle power play shot by the Rangers in Game 3 on Sunday:
It was quickly derided as poor use of the technique – sharp enough angle but too far out – and that may be true. But at what point does poor execution of VH, rather than poor selection of when to use it also come into play?
Neuvirth holds his glove up, but outside the post where it protects nothing, rather than over this shoulder in the net space the puck goes in. He also gets caught cheating off the post, which begs the question: Would it have gone in anyway if he’d been squared up to the shooter in a traditional butterfly, especially if he cheated to the middle again?
about 1 year ago
miseenjeu
1 comment
0 recs |
Comments
A goalie wants to be square to the puck. Not the shooter.
Yes, his technique was sort of lazy. It happens. There are a million ways he could have stopped the puck differently including while in a VH. The main thing is he played the situation wrong. Analyzing it past that doesn’t really matter in my opinion because playing the situation wrong is the biggest fault.
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.


































