Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

How Jason Chimera Scored A Goal From The Penalty Box; or, Why Defensemen Shouldn't Fight

Good things happen when you drive the net.  Sometimes, they just take longer than you'd expect. 

With about 40 seconds left in the 2nd period of yesterday's game against the Blackhawks, Jason Chimera had himself a bit of a breakaway, streaking wide down the right side. Chimera scored a goal with that play, but the goal took seven minutes of game time and more than half an hour of real life to show up on the scoreboard.

Star-divide

To take his shot, Chimera had to cut sharply through the crease.  Chimera's shot bounced off the goalpost, but as he cut across the crease his thigh caught Hawks goalie Corey Crawford in the jaw, snapping the goaltender's head back.  Some have suggested that the theatrical, flopping sprawl by Crawford that followed was a bit embellished, but there's no question that Chimera made solid contact with Crawford's head.  No penalty was called, and defenseman Brent Seabrook took issue.  Seabrook challenged Chimera to a fight.  After alternating bear-hugs, they both went off the ice with 5-minute majors.

Seabrook's decision to fight was poor.  In any ordinary game, the Capitals will trade losing grinder Chimera and Olympic Gold-medal-winner Seabrook for five minutes any time that opportunity becomes available.  But this was no ordinary situation.  Defenseman Brian Campbell had skated his final shift of the game ten minutes previously, coming off the ice with an injury and leaving Chicago with just five defensemen to finish the then-tied game.  And at the time, Chicago's forwards on the ice included Jake Dowell (8 fights this season) and Troy Brouwer (4 fights).  Why, of all people, did Seabrook (0 previous fights this season) feel the need to take on the role of enforcer?

Seabrook left Chicago with only four eligible defensemen while he served his major penalty.  To understand the effect of such a short bench, it's useful to understand how athletes recover from intense hockey shifts.  Four years ago, Brian Murray explained:

Forty-five seconds is about what the body can handle. A player can go pretty good for 45 seconds. An exceptional player might be able to go for a minute.  At 45 seconds, the player can recover and be ready to go back on the ice at a ratio of one in three shifts. If they go longer than that, it can affect them for the rest of the game.

Keep the highlighted language in mind through this description of the opening minutes of the 3rd period as played by rookie Nick Leddy and all-star Duncan Keith.  And imagine running hard for their described shift lengths, while taking the described rests in between.

Nick Hjallmarsson and Chris Campoli took the ice for the opening faceoff of the 3rd period, before yielding to Keith and Leddy.  Leddy's first shift was long, 55 seconds, while Keith's was 36 seconds.  Leddy and Keith were off the ice for 45 seconds before taking the ice again, this time for a 42-second shift.  At the end of that shift, Leddy and Keith rested for 53 seconds before jumping on the ice again.  Ten seconds into that shift by Leddy and Keith, Crawford froze the puck, leading to the only faceoff of the opening minutes of the period.  The puck dropped 20 seconds later (scant rest for the weary), and Leddy and Keith completed their shifts -- 48 seconds for Keith, and a long 68 seconds for Leddy.  They were off the ice for about 50 seconds each before taking the ice again.  Leddy skated 38 seconds, and Keith an extra-long 74 seconds before this happened:

R88lc3_jpg_medium

 

9qit94_jpg_medium

(Many thanks to Dimagus for the gifs)

The gentleman on the goalie's left who hits Laich into the boards too late, and then takes too low an angle and fails to prevent Laich from taking prime position in front of the goal, is Nick Leddy (#8).  Behind the net, failing to tie up Eric Fehr or prevent the pass to Laich, is Norris Trophy winner Duncan Keith (#2).  Which just goes to show what happens to a very good defenseman at the end of a 74-second shift when he's been double-shifting for several minutes with no breaks.  Or, as Keith himself put it:

That was tough.  We had four 'D' there for a good part of the game and five for most of the game. It wears on you, especially with a team like (Washington) with a lot of speed and guys who can do a good job cycling the puck and playing it down low.

All told, Keith had been on the ice for 3:20 and Leddy for 3:23 of the 6:23 of 3rd period action before the goal.  The great irony is that pugilist Seabrook had already completed his penance -- the penalty expired after just 4:41.  Of course, with both Seabrook and Chimera in the box, and the play at 5-on-5, neither player could leave the box until a whistle.  So Seabrook languished in the box more than a minute and a half longer than he had to.  In that time, Chicago attempted 4 shots -- 3 blocked and one low Campoli point shot stopped by a pad save.  If the Hawks had shot the puck into Holtby's chest, he'd have frozen it and they'd have had an offensive zone faceoff -- with Brent Seabrook on the ice.  Instead, play continued, and an exhausted defensive corps yielded a critical goal.

So the next time you see Mike Green, or even John Erskine drop the gloves, keep in mind that a team can afford to lose a forward for 5 minutes much more easily than a defenseman.  This was an extreme situation, given Campbell's injury, but when a forward and a defenseman fight, the advantage always goes to the forward's team.

If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.

Comment 38 comments  |  45 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Japers' Rink

The Noon Number

May 2012 by J.P. - 11 comments

The Noon Number

May 2012 by J.P. - 45 comments

2011-12 Rink Wrap: Jason Chimera

May 2012 by Becca H - 44 comments

Monday Caps Clips

May 2012 by EmilyB - 309 comments

Tuesday Caps Clips

May 2012 by J.P. - 1318 comments

Comments

Display:

Awesome work G.O.D. And not just cause you used Dima’s gifs. Chimmer for Seabrook…hell Chimmer for basically any D man is a trade I’ll take every time.

Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.

by Davethecapsfan on Mar 14, 2011 1:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Great stuff. I’d add that in the sequence that led to the GWG Mackan beat Keith to a puck in the corner. Sure, Mackan has speed, but he shouldn’t be out-skating Keith and he definitely shouldn’t be muscling Keith off the puck. I’d be willing to bet that if Keith isn’t gassed he almost always wins that battle. So in addition to the importance of short shifts and adequate rest, the total TOI is important. Skating Green for 28 is significantly more tiring than 26:30, even if it seems small.

Love you pointing out the CHI potential fighters on the ice.

I’d say with 6D you can stand to lose a bottom pair guy like Erskine, but I definitely wouldn’t want to lose a top pair guy like Green or Seabrook. While the AO line, Seabrook’s assignment, didn’t directly burn the Hawks for Seabrook’s fight, it’s pretty clear that the absence of a top pair guy really came back to bite them here.

First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!

by Rob Parker on Mar 14, 2011 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Erskine-for-Iginla is one I’d want Erskine to agree to every time. But I’d have to think very hard about, say, Erskine-for-Lucic. Lucic is clearly the better player, but losing Erskine throws the pairings off and makes all of the Caps’ D work harder than the Bruins’ F corps would have to work to compensate for losing Lucic. I’m not sure that would be a fair trade.

Erskine-for-Rupp should occur only in outdoor games.

Washington still suffers from legitimately below-average goaltending, which hurts them more than the defensive improvements help.

by Gould Old Days on Mar 14, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I guess the timing of the fight is also a factor for me. Is it early when the players are all still rested? Does it break up the 5 minutes evenly across an intermission so the other D only have to compensate for 2-3 minutes at a time? I generally agree with your Erskine guidelines, but I think I’m a tad bit more permissive of his fighting than you are.

First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!

by Rob Parker on Mar 14, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Truth is, I probably am too

Washington still suffers from legitimately below-average goaltending, which hurts them more than the defensive improvements help.

by Gould Old Days on Mar 14, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent analysis, and give even more kudos to deserved Chimera. As observers and fans we will cheer the home team player whenever a fight occurs, but we often don’t pay attention to the penalty. If it’s near the end of the period they get an early trip to the locker room, if they’re in the penalty box how many of us look at the scoreboard to note when the 5 minutes will be up? I’d wager not nearly enough.

As evidenced by the situation, 5 minutes does not mean just 5 minutes. In this case it was 6:42 but it could have gone on longer, they turned 1/4 of a period into 1/3 by continuing without a faceoff. Now you start thinking strategically, with an injury and a fighting major reducing their defensemen down to 4, they can’t risk taking a regular minor penalty either. Apply some pressure and try to bait a holding, hooking, anything. Suddenly they’re down to 3 and you’re on the power play.

Puck possession and zone time are like adding weights to their skates. Whether you score a PPG then or have the Wheels line grind one out later in the period, it’s the smart play.

by Dimagus on Mar 14, 2011 2:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Is some part of that on Coach Q? Specifically, the part about getting the whistle to spring your guy. Are there some instructions he could have given his forwards, or were the Caps pwning them so thoroughly that they literally had no option?

And Imma trying to remember…Coach used his timeout only after the goal was scored, yes?

You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!

by EmilyB on Mar 14, 2011 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

In a remarkable coincidence, Quenneville used his TO at the exact mirror image time as the goal — with 6:23 left instead of 6:23 into the period. He used it wisely, after a long shift culminated in an icing and he couldn’t change lines.

But it wouldn’t have helped him. You can’t stop play with a TO – he needed an independent whistle.

Washington still suffers from legitimately below-average goaltending, which hurts them more than the defensive improvements help.

by Gould Old Days on Mar 14, 2011 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gouldie asked about this in the GDT. It’s real hard to tell players to get a whistle at an exact moment in the flow of play. Normally you have to either yell “whistle” from the bench (or some facsimile), or you have to have a draw within :30 of the end of the penalty so the players on the ice know exactly what has to happen when they start their shift and they have a decent gauge of how long :30 is. Even :30 can be pushing it on the long side, but I assume NHL guys can handle that.

First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!

by Rob Parker on Mar 14, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given the fact that defensemen only have three lines (as opposed to 4) and do not generally go the length of the ice in as much as a rush as the forwards, I always assumed that defensemen’s higher time on ice was attributed to longer shifts.

I learned something new today? So d men generally go back to the bench every 35-45 seconds just like forwards?

by Brainumbc on Mar 14, 2011 7:09 AM EDT reply actions  

I always assumed that defensemen’s higher time on ice was attributed to longer shifts

Take a look at the TOI/shift leaders - a bit D-heavy, but not too much so.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 14, 2011 7:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll keep my eye on the D men next game to see how they roll.

And speaking of which. So if a team loses a D man and only has 5 left, does the coach try to keep the original pairings as much as possible and double shift the most conditions defenseman to fill the gap, or does he pretty much just stagger the shifts and then rotate one person at a time?

by Brainumbc on Mar 14, 2011 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

That depends on the talent at hand and the usual rotation a team has. Quite a few teams have a pair that will get 40% of the even strength time, and the other 2 pairs will get 30% or so of the even strength time. The 40% pair may not be the pair with the best defensman on it. If I’m the Caps, I don’t want Green out there 40% of the time even strength because I want him available for 75-80% of the power play minutes. A pair like Alzner-Carlson is the 40% pair, with Wideman, Poti, Green, Hannan and Schultz making up the balance (if everyone’s healthy). Some teams actually have defensemen who play half the game (Pronger used to, MacInnis and Leetch did before they retired, Langway in his prime did too).

I suspect if the Caps were down to 5 yesterday it would depend on who was out…

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy

by MikeL-Pivonka on Mar 14, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great stuff, Gouldie. I’d noted the trade-off in today’s Ups and Downs, but this goes into great depth on that point. Beauty of a FanPost.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Mar 14, 2011 7:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Very informative fan post. Thanks for the analysis.

Don’t make fun of my obsession over ketchup dispensers ever again! ;) Ted Leonsis

by miseenjeu on Mar 14, 2011 7:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Bump to that. Thanks!

by richdvn on Mar 14, 2011 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good stuff. I just wish I could show this fanpost to Matt Corrente or Mark Fraser…

In Lou We Trust/Twitter
I wish there was something I could do. But What?

by Kevin Sellathamby on Mar 14, 2011 9:10 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Guys have problems with shift length? I thought Lemaire was real good at controlling shift length. Weird that young guys would be bucking the system.

First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!

by Rob Parker on Mar 14, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually it was about defensemen being stupid and fighting scrubs. (Fraser broke his hand fighting McCormick early on in the season, and because of that I had to watch the horrorshow that was Oliver Magnan-Grenier, and I cannot unsee that)

In Lou We Trust/Twitter
I wish there was something I could do. But What?

by Kevin Sellathamby on Mar 14, 2011 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, my bad. The whole point of the FanPost and everything…

First Round Exit! (Clap Clap ClapClapClap) First Round Exit!

by Rob Parker on Mar 14, 2011 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Many thanks for your analysis. I love posts that teach me about the subtitles of the game. You illuminated a strategic moment in the game in which someone with my level of knowledge would have otherwise missed completely. Additionally, I will think of this post whenever we or another team is forced to roll just four or five defensemen. Before I only thought of how it messes up pairings, not the degree to which it can affect shift lengths.

"Hockey won’t hold still for a portrait. To gain a glimpse inside you join it in progress—just as the players do."--epilogue of 24/7

by capsyoungguns on Mar 14, 2011 9:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Sorry for my wordiness—need more coffee and clarity or mind.

"Hockey won’t hold still for a portrait. To gain a glimpse inside you join it in progress—just as the players do."--epilogue of 24/7

by capsyoungguns on Mar 14, 2011 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

“of mind”

"Hockey won’t hold still for a portrait. To gain a glimpse inside you join it in progress—just as the players do."--epilogue of 24/7

by capsyoungguns on Mar 14, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I haven’t looked at the replays much, but I got the impression Chimera went after Seabrook for a fight for a recent hit, rather than Seabrook going after Chimera for a hit on Crawford.

Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems. - Homer Simpson

by jaytown99 on Mar 14, 2011 9:45 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m going my memory here, but I believe Seabrook crosschecked Chimera first. They certainly got a little chippy.

"Hockey won’t hold still for a portrait. To gain a glimpse inside you join it in progress—just as the players do."--epilogue of 24/7

by capsyoungguns on Mar 14, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup. Seabrook gave Chimera an extra hit, and Chimera followed Seabrook, clearly saying “you want a piece of me?” I think it’s fair to say Chimera was very willing to fight.

Washington still suffers from legitimately below-average goaltending, which hurts them more than the defensive improvements help.

by Gould Old Days on Mar 14, 2011 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

And won—woo hoo. Until your post, that’s all I thought of the moment. Chimmers actually won.

"Hockey won’t hold still for a portrait. To gain a glimpse inside you join it in progress—just as the players do."--epilogue of 24/7

by capsyoungguns on Mar 14, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chimera hit crow, seabrook hit chimera, chimera crosschecked seabrook until the fought.

Suspend Colin Campbell!

by snowburnt on Mar 14, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why, of all people, did Seabrook (0 previous fights this season) feel the need to take on the role of enforcer?

Watching from 118, both my brother and I saw Chimera get hit pretty hard, and took great exception to it. He was PISSED to say the least. IIRC, he followed after Seabrook skated in front and turned to face him asking him to go. The reason why I highlighted that section of your post is because it seemed to be that Seabrook did not want to fight and was what I said to my brother. I though I saw Chimera grab him and kind of force him into it.

I can resist anything, except temptation.

by alisterio on Mar 14, 2011 11:08 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree. To me it looked like Chimmer was the aggresor in that one to the point where I was concerned that Chimmer might get an instigator penalty. I’m going to guess both players knew the situation (i.e. that Chicago was down a D man at the time) which is why Seabrook was reluctant to engage.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on Mar 14, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is the protocol for calling up a fanpost to the front page? IMHO this post deserves a cup of coffee.

by leacha on Mar 14, 2011 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

policy here is to link to fanposts or fanshots in the daily caps clips, but not to promote them to the center column.

by Natty Bumppo on Mar 14, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excellent work – this is the kind of insight I wish they could provide in a national broadcast!

by panic13 on Mar 14, 2011 1:24 PM EDT reply actions  

They kind of have a limited amount of time and this isn’t that interesting to the casual fan on a national broadcast, plus it probably took GOD a fair amount of time to look up shift lengths, etc.

Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems. - Homer Simpson

by jaytown99 on Mar 14, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right – but maybe just a nod to Chimmer for more than just getting Seabrook off Ovi for 5 minutes. I don’t recall them talking too much about the impact that had on the Hawks other D.

by panic13 on Mar 14, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I originally didn’t realize that Campbell has already left the game due to his injury. But when the fight was happening, I felt like it was a good tradeoff; a third line forward taking one of the other team’s best defensemen off the ice. (And both parties spent more time in the box than the 5 minutes.)

On fights; it seems like when Green gets into fights, he at least fights with stars (or, relatively speaking, stars). This year he had fought Ilya Kovalchuk (a fight neither really wanted to do) and Brandon Dubinsky (who was leading the Rangers in goals at the time and near the top of the league in that department at the time as well).

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Mar 14, 2011 8:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I was so hoping someone would do a post on this. Great job G.O.D.

The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Associate Editor at Five For Howling.

by Carl Putnam on Mar 15, 2011 5:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Awesome stuff G.O.D. —great in-depth analysis.

Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.

by Rather Bengt on Mar 16, 2011 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators