Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Boudreau: Should he stay or should he go?

Mike Green games into the season, our beloved Caps stand at 27-25.  Yeah, yeah, I know we got the charity point in 10 of those games (league leaders in SOMETHING, at least), but that is what the record boils down to.  Consistent effort from the club has been well...consistently absent.  Tonight's game against the Habs is a perfect example, even if it followed a slightly different script than most nights over the last 2+ months.  As I've seen it (and maybe I'm wrong), since 12/1, Caps hockey boils down to this: 1 really good period, 1 really bad period and 1 meh period.  The order has been somewhat interchangeable, but given the team's well documented first period struggles, it generally goes bad, average, good. Tonight went good, abysmal, average, but I digress.  If the bad and the meh period are REALLY bad, the team loses despite any furious comeback attempts (see: Colorado 12/11, Boston 12/18, Vancouver 1/14).  In those cases one could yammer endlessly about the "hot goalie".  Yes, Anderson, Thomas and Bobby Lou played very well in those games, but the fact is that in each game, the Caps dug themselves a big hole and despite dominating the play late in all 3 instances, they were unable to pot the necessary tying goal (much less the winning one).  Hot goalie or not, these games are the outliers in the bunch; most nights there isn't a heroic charge at all.  The Capitals have been blanked 6 times since the Dec. 1 victory over St. Louis and 3 other times the team has been held to 1 goal.  Too often of late, the "good period" is simply one where no mistakes are made and the team escapes to the intermission without surrendering a tally.

Star-divide

I'm a realist: the "60 minute game" is an illusion in hockey.  The guys on the other side of the ice are professionals and it is next to impossible to shut down or even control a healthy majority of the possession time against professionals for 60+ minutes a game 82 times a year in the regular season plus however many games in the playoffs.  However, what the Caps have been accomplishing of late is a far cry from that fictitious ideal.  The simple fact is: this team is capable of playing better than it does a lot of the time.  I know it, you know it, BB knows it and they all know it too.  One of the questions I've asked myself time and time again after seeing the same lackadaisical play over and over again is whether BB is incapable of making adjustments or if the boys in red are just too lazy to care for roughly 30 minutes a game when Pittsburgh isn't the opponent.   Either way it would seem to be a poor reflection on his coaching abilities: either he's incompetent (which given his success at other levels, I doubt) or he can't get his charges to listen to him.  I know it probably sounds like I'm one of the armchair GMs that McPhee so eloquently slammed by saying "if they knew anything about hockey they'd be in the game".  I'm taking the defense of Socrates: the only thing I know is that I don't know anything.  I don't know what's going on at Kettler, Verizon or any of the stops along the road behind the scenes.  Trying to parse 24/7 for some window into the locker room is Sisyphean at best, however I do know that lack of effort seems to have been a consistent problem since early on in the 2008/2009 season.  It wasn't quite as glaring that season or the subsequent one because pucks were hitting twine at an eye-popping rate: any bad periods were easily being overcome by the good ones.  That just isn't the case anymore and the things some of us have been seeing for years are now becoming blatantly evident not only to the members of the Red Army who turned a blind eye to laziness, but to the rest of the hockey world.

I've been contemplating the job status of BB and whether or not he should get the axe.  As we all know, hockey is unique amongst professional sports in North America in that a coaching change can jump start a team's fortunes rapidly as opposed to other sports where such measures are done as acts of desperation and seldom benefit the team.  NFL and MLB coaches who acquire their jobs mid/late season never amount to anything during their initial season: one NFL coach has made the playoffs after not beginning the year in the head coaching position (and the '78 NE Patriots were 11-4 when the switch was made...not exactly a common situation).

Clearly, things are different in the NHL.  The oft mentioned 08/09 Pens, 09/10 Flyers spring to mind as the hackneyed cliche...but it goes far deeper than that.   The whole point of this post is to a) combat my insomnia and b) crunch a lot of numbers to see whether or not the move really makes sense.  I've had plenty of knee jerk reactions this season where I reflexively scream for BB's haagen dazs swollen head, but I wanted to see if the numbers really justify a change.  Of course, even if they do, it begs the question....who?  As I'm no GM, I haven't the foggiest.  I do NOT think a guy like Ken Hitchcock is the answer.  If the team doesn't feel like playing hard on a consistent basis for a player's coach, a taskmaster probably wouldn't get better results.  The point of this diatribe is to look at the numbers and see if a change would be warranted, numerically.  Here are all the mid-season coaching changes since the lockout minus a couple of extreme outliers (Quenneville taking over after 4 games doesn't really strike me as a midseason replacement. Ditto Hitchcock getting canned from the Flyers in 05/06.  Same goes for Waddell taking over Atlanta 6 games into the 07/08 season)  And Here...We...Go...

2005/2006

1. John Torchetti .417 (5-7) vs Andy Murray .564 (37-28-5) Playoffs=No.  Outlier Status=yes.  This was a bit of an odd situation, but I kept it in my analysis anyway.  Net Change= -.147

2.  Bob Gainey .598 (23-15-3) vs. Claude Julien .537 (19-16-6).  Playoffs=yes (QF loss) Net change= .061

3. Michel Therrien .353 vs Eddie O .355.  Not really relevant because Pittsburgh was still in tank mode for draft picks at this point.  Net change= -.002

4. Brad Shaw .500 (18-18-4) vs Steve Stirling .452 (18-22-2)  No playoffs.  Net Change=.048

5. Lou Lamiorello .680 (32-14-4) vs Larry Robinson .516 (14-13-5) Playoffs: Yes (ECSF Loss) Net Change .164

Summary: 5 Teams changed coaches, 3 missed the playoffs.  Average Change in the Raw Numbers was .0248 but if you factor out the Kings' situation, the change more than doubles to .0542. 

2006/2007

1. Ken Hitchcock .492 (28-29-5) vs Gerard Gallant .300 (5-13-2) No playoffs, but CBJ had a significantly better winning % under Hitchcock.  Net Change=.192

2. Denis Savard .451 (24-30-7) vs Trent Yawney .396 (7-12-2).  No Playoffs. Net Change .055

3. Andy Murray .580 (27-18-11) vs Mike Kitchen .291 (7-17-4).  No Playoffs but the team's winning percentage was almost doubled.  Net change=.289

Summary: None of the coaching changes this season would produce a playoff run, but all three teams did improve and two of them (Blues and Jackets) improved substantially.  Both Hitchcock and Murray would later take their teams to the playoffs albeit both exiting in the first round.

2007/2008

1. Bruce Boudreau .664 (37-17-7) vs Glen Hanlon .310 (6-14-1).  Playoffs?  Duh.  Very memorable run from Thanksgiving through April.  Best to just forget how it ended (I'm Don Koharski...goalie interference?  what's tha..hey is that a donut?) Net Change= .354

Both coaching changes in the NHL this year came from the Southeast, but as mentioned above, Waddell took over after 6 games, so Gabby is the only one relevant to this study.  To this point in the post-lockout NHL, BB was the most successful mid-season replacement.  Lamiorello had a slightly better winning percentage but he was also taking over a veteran team he had built himself.  Not quite the same thing as taking a team of 21/22 year olds who'd never known anything but losing at the NHL level and turning them into division champions.  Lest there be another banner raised, we'll stop there.

2008/2009

1. *Dan Bylsma* .800 (18-3-4) vs Michel Therrien .518 (27-25-5).  Easily the (disco) king of the midseason replacement coaches.  Best winning % and a cup.  This still makes me sick though, even though I do respect Disco Dan.  Stars added because there are a lot of similarities between the Pens of that year and the Caps of this year.  Former Jack Adams winner?  Check.  Underperforming yet talented roster?  Check.  Even the game count of Therrien is pretty close to BB's total this year.  The one thing missing (so far) are the key deadline acquisitions...cough cough...2C...cough cough cough.  Obviously if a change is made, this is the dream scenario. Net Change=.282

2.Cory Clouston 19-11-4 .618 vs Craig Hartsburg .427 (17-24-7).  No playoffs, but the Sens played a hell of a lot better after making the switch to Willem Dafoe Clouston.  Net Change= .191

3.  John Tortorella (12-7-2) .619 vs Tom Renney  (31-23-7) .566.  Playoffs:  Yep.  Good guys beat em, too :D  Also somewhat relevant to our present situation in that the Rangers hit the skids with a few months left in the season after starting off well.  Record from Dec 3rd (W over Pit) to Feb 22 when Renney was fired: 14-16-5.  Caps record from Dec 1 to the present: 10-9-8.  The big caveat here is that the Rangers of this season were VERY good in the shootout and would not have sniffed the playoffs without it.  We're just...bad...at over time.  Net Change: .053

Summary: 3 Coaching changes, 2 playoff runs, 1 Stanley Cup.  Average improvement=.176

2009/2010

1. Peter Laviolette .545 (28-23-5) vs John Stevens .519 (13-12-1).  Marginal improvement of .026 in the regular season but the big story would obviously be the run to the SCFs. 

2.  Claude Noel .541 (10-8-6) vs Ken Hitchcock .449.  No playoffs.  Net Improvement=.098

Summary: While injury kept the Flyers down for most of the regular season and they didn't make the playoffs until the last day of the season in a gimmick win, they did roll on to the finals.  Hard to argue that this was not a successful coaching change for them.  CBJ missed the playoffs last year and Noel was not invited back. Average improvement= .062.

So what do all these numbers tell us?  Teams generally do better after a coach is replaced.  Out of 14 coaching changes listed here, 12 teams posted a higher winning percentage under the new regime.  As for the two that didn't, the Kings fired Andy Murray at the tail end of the year creating something of an NFL/MLB type effect on the team's fortunes as opposed to the usual NHL one.  The other was the 06/07 Pens who were not yet ready to climb out of the toilet, but even then the decline was minute.  .002.  The average improvement for these 14 teams was .119.   The Caps' current winning percentage is .516.  Extrapolate that across the 30 remaining games, you come up with  31 points.  31+64=95 which SHOULD be enough to secure a bottom 5 playoff spot.  Prima Facie, it would seem that Gabby doesn't need to go anywhere.

Win % at the Verizon center is .696.  With 13 remaining home games, one could expect 16 more points out of 26 to be collected at home. Road win percentage is .521.  With 17 remaining road games, one can expect 17.7 out of a possible 34 points.  That gives a better number than looking at the straight win percentage, a total of 33.7 points compared to the 31 as seen above.  The problem with reading these numbers straight up?  It takes into account the WHOLE season.  The Capitals win % as of December 1 was .731 (18-6-2....seems like a distant memory, eh?) .  Since then, Home % is .462 (3-4-6).  Away: .500 (5-5-2).  If THESE numbers continue, expected home points drop to 12 and away to an even 17.  29 vs 33.7.  93 points.  Still not overly scared?  Take a look at the schedule. 14/30 games remaining are against teams which currently hold a playoff spot.   LA, Carolina and St. Louis are still in the hunt at present.  That means 17 out of 30 games are against playoff contenders.  That's a rough road, folks.  Given the way we've been playing of late, I think 29 points would be generous vs that quality of opponent.  That .119 average improvement would provide some added cushion and maybe even improve our seeding (assuming Tampa falls back to earth, which I keep waiting for and it just keeps on not happening.

So there you have it, I think the math at least puts Bruce's head on the block.  It is probably still a little too early to pull the lever to drop the guillotine, but if we lose to Tampa and Pittsburgh this week, the 2nd big losing streak of the year grows to 5 games and our expected point share goes from 29 to 26-27.  It'll only get worse from there.  Its not too late for the guys to bail out their coach.  If he's as likable as NHL players seem to think he is and the team enjoys playing for him, maybe they'll finally extract their heads from their asses and the Washington Capitals will stop being a macrocosm of Alex Semin: All the talent in the world, when they want to use it but lazy and stupid when they don't feel like trying.  If extraction proves too difficult...best to do something before it is absolutely too late and we wind up like the 07/08 Carolina Hurricanes.

p.s.

To anyone who actually read all this: thanks!  Thoughts and comments are always appreciated.  Lets Go Caps.

Poll
Should GMGM hand Gabby his last meal of barbeque sauce flavored haagen dazs and get another coach?
Yes
203 votes
No
117 votes

320 votes | Poll has closed

If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.

Comment 124 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I do NOT think a guy like Ken Hitchcock is the answer.

Agreed. I’m actually a fan of Ken Hitchcock, but given the makeup of the Caps, I just don’t think he’d be able to get the job done. Hitch is a systems guy who doesn’t seem to fit the team that McPhee has put together.

What about Mark French? That would match the mold exactly of what the Penguins did when they canned Therrien. The biggest benefit is that the minor-league coach knows the system, knows the organization, and knows many of the players.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 2, 2011 8:04 AM EST reply actions  

I think French doesn’t have enough time in service and has had virtually no exposure to the bigs either via playing or assistant coaching (that I know of).

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Yep. I’d have voted yes in the poll, but I’m not sure there’s a good replacement out there.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 2, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

In between that and the whole in-season thing, that’s why I voted no.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I would state that French would be the next best thing. I think his proven ability to change his strategy on the fly, which was proven when we went down 3-1 in the Calder Cup Finals last year. They came up with a new, grittier, less glamour-based style of hockey and stuck it out another 3 games to win the title… again.

That’s the kind of thinking on a dime we need from a coach. NOT 8 games of losing withe probably the best or second best set of talent on the ice before you scream in exacerbation: “We’re playing a TRAP [because I want to keep my job and I like it up here]!”

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 2, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

French would be my choice if we were to change coaches now.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 2, 2011 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I concur, Dr. And if we had to wait until the off-season, I’d love to see what Lindy Ruff could do with the amazing talent pool we have here in DC. Heck, if we got bounced in the first round again I wouldn’t mind seeing Ron Wislon again, either. I’ll take a Silver Medal winning Olympic coach anyday.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

You know, I like the way you are thinking. I was watching the Leafs/Montreal game tonight and I was thinking, “I wonder what at tactician like Ron Wilson could do with the Caps talent”. Nothing will happen until after the season is over. You have to look at Ruff. Bob Hartley gets a look, but you have to accept that he’s a little nuts and he wears on the players like Wilson, but less than Mike Keenen. I don’t think the Caps will go with an AHL coach if they make a change. IF they make a change, it will be for a guy who has a pedigree as a task master that the players will respect by reputation. These guys don’t know Mark French, and right or wrong, this is probably not the right circumstance for him to step into.

by NHL Observer on Feb 13, 2011 2:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree. He has more PLAYOFF experience in the AHL, and a MUCH, MUCH better rate of success (two back-to-back Calders) than BB ever did. And in less time.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 2, 2011 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

When I mean bigs, I mean NHL. And those Hershey teams were insanely talented compared to the rest of the league, he’s not going to be working with that luxury if he got promoted up here.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think that’s giving the AHL its due place in this discussion. Where do you think NHL coaches come from? European leagues? Nearly every replacement coach mentioned above was grooming lesser talent in the minor leagues, which are still considered Bigs by many actual hockey players. I have a lot of friends, including a groomsman, who couldn’t crack the AHL roster and ended up heading to Europe to play, and they’d tell you that after spending 20+ years in the hockey world the AHL is the next best thing and is an explicit NHL development league. One of the best development leagues in the world. That goes for coaches, too. You think Steve Yzerman held out for Boucher this offseason because he just wanted to play mind games? No, it’s because even an AHL coach with a modicum of Calder playoff experience is worth more than their weight in gold. Look at Disco Dan, for goodness sake. Not the norm, but certainly the perrenial hope of every GM who reaches down in the organization for “that next potential winner.” Organizations rarely go shopping for coaches outside their affiliates, and we are just fortunate enough to have one of the best AHL bench bosses only 2 hours away.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 2, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Organizations rarely go shopping for coaches outside their affiliates ,and we are just fortunate enough to have one of the best AHL bench bosses only 2 hours away.

As to the former, that’s simply not true. Lavs was an external hire. So was Quenneville, Martin, Tortorella, Tippett, Wilson, etc. As to the latter, I think that there’s something to be said for the insane talent he had on that roster last year and there may be a better gauge on him now, but he’s only been there for a year and a half, and has had no NHL or international visibility. By comparison:

Byls had a dozen years playing in the pros and one as an assistant coach before SWB.

Boucher was an assistant and later coach in the Q and A for a decade and worked with the Canada U-18s and U20s before going to the ’Ning.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I honestly think this recent trend of looking from within for replacements is in no small part thanks to BB’s success in 07-08.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 2, 2011 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

For sure, Clouston, Capuano, etc.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It probably doesn’t hurt that you already have the guys under contract, which makes a mid-season coaching change much easier. When the AHL coaches are still under contract with their AHL clubs (and usually their NHL clubs) its pretty difficult to get them from their existing clubs.

I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.

by iwearstripes on Feb 3, 2011 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

I concur completely.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

*in-season*

I untintentionally ommited the word “in-season” from the statment “organizations rarely go shopping in-season for coaches outside their affiliates.” With exception to Lavs, every single coach you mentioned (or at least the vast majority) was acquired out of season.

That’s just not done anymore, at least at current. It could swing the other way again… you never know. Just not the trend at present. Also – you could make a great case for pretty much any coach as far as experience and justification goes. Whether or not they would be a good fit with a new organization, however, is another story.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

He has more PLAYOFF experience in the AHL, and a MUCH, MUCH better rate of success (two back-to-back Calders) than BB ever did. And in less time.

Would that this were true. He’s won 1 Calder Cup as a head coach. He joined the Bears midway through the 07-08 season as an assistant after Boudreau got called up.

French has got one championship as a head coach, Boudreau has two. Boudreau guided the Bears to the Calder Cup finals two years running. Boudreau has had a sub-.500 record twice in an 18-year coaching career.

All that being said, I wouldn’t mind seeing French replace Boudreau. He’s part of that new generation of business-like coaches, a la Bylsma. I think the Caps could use some of that attitude right now.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree. He has more PLAYOFF experience in the AHL, and a MUCH, MUCH better rate of success (two back-to-back Calders) than BB ever did. And in less time

French is still using many of BB’s former players, and the same style and strategies. Also consider the Bears have more NHL talent than any other club in the AHL at present, most of the pluses of French are good, but not as good as you’d think.

At the time, these were pretty much the same arguments for Gabby to replace Hanlon.

Changing coaches doesn’t necissarily mean it was the right choice long term. Comparing Bysmal’s P% to his predecessor are remarkably similiar. This year the Pens currently have a .667 p%, the first full season under Dan was a .616%. The year he took over the Pens were at .604% So yes, a first hand look would say he really turned to team around. But Therrien’s previous 2 seasons with the team were a .622 and .640. Therrien came in with one of the worst Penguins teams at the team, an abysmal .387 pt % (and also first year Crosby played) but turned the team around the next season to that .640

Is there any large outlying coincidence with Therrien’s turn around of the team, and how Bysmal and Therrien current stats are similiar? Yes. The players, the team make up and namely a guy known as Sid the Kid. The year Therrien went .640 Sid had 120 points. The year Therrien posted a .622 Sid played only 50 games and 70 points. Under Bysmal, the much more winning Pens have gotten a 40% increase in goals from Sid that coincides with Bysmal’s very nice winning %.

So its not surprising that BB’s worst year comes when ALL of his star players, namely 8 and 19, are having their worst years. With star players I don’t believe coaching has that much of an impact on how they perform. Note that during Therrien’s tenture Crosby had a higher point per game average than he currently does(1.33 with Bysmal, 1.44 with Therrien both over 2 seasons(and even with Sid’s current season, his best however abbreviated as the season isn’t over his 1.6 this season doesn’t carry his former average over the latter))

There are a lot of intangibles for coaching that outsiders can’t really tell whats going on, unless they happen to be a fly on the wall. The performance the Caps have been giving on ice can be attributed at least partially to their offensive drop, after all you can’t win if you don’t score which I just don’t find to be totally Boudreau’s fault
.

Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."

Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.

by breaklance on Feb 2, 2011 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

French makes no sense to me, as he’s a Boudreau disciple. It would not be nearly a substantive enough move to warrant being made because there’d be no real reason to expect vastly different results.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Feb 2, 2011 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

French actually isn’t a Boudreau disciple in the way that Woods was. Boudreau and Woods had played/coached together in Mississippi, then coached together in Hershey. French and Boudreau have never been behind the same bench.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct. But he coached under Woods – just meant he was in the organizational family tree, and there’s no way that if they can Boudreau now they’re going back to that well.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Feb 2, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

My money’s on Hartley.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 6:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the only way this would work is if the reality is that BB has “lost the room”. While this is a possibility, I wonder about the continued viability of the system @ the NHL level. To be honest, even in lazy mode, this team has too much freaking talent to be completely shut down as long as they have been if the system still works. We’ve scored 4+ goals 4 times since December 1 and two of the games were empty netters(4-1 against STL and Ovie’s hat trick goal against the Leafs). So essentially that is 2 offensive outbursts in 27 games (4 goals in the SO loss to TOR and 5 against NJD). That would seem to indicate that there’s something wrong with the system. Granted, you made the point that French was able to adjust in the playoffs, an important trait that BB has generally lacked. He seems to be more of the buckshot type…I’m going to keep throwing the same thing at you and just try and stop it. Problem is, the league has figured out how to stop it. Not sure a continuation of having the new boss be the same as the old boss would be the right idea. Part of me wants to say shaking up the system is no good mid season…but hell it worked for Pittsburgh. I didn’t vote in my own poll, seemed like it would be disingenuous.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I like French, but maybe we need a different perspective. Is there any assistant coach with the Wings worth looking at?

by difer on Feb 3, 2011 7:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I think if he’s gonna’ go, hes gonna’ go AFTER the playoffs. Not much reason to let him go now.

by Brainumbc on Feb 2, 2011 8:15 AM EST reply actions  

I would think there is. If they keep playing as they are, there will not be a playoff appearance.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s what Philly thought last year

If the playoffs started TOMMORROW then maybe we’d be in trouble. but the season is 82 games for a reason

by Brainumbc on Feb 2, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I understand that, but a catalyst is needed. If the Caps lose too many of the upcoming “4 point games” they will be on the outside looking in.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

This is hilarious to me. I honestly do not understand how you can have this opinion. Since the losing streak ended, the Caps are top 5 or 6 in the league, the NHL, in points. As “poorly” as they have been playing, they are still raking points at a rate that matches pace with a lot of playoff teams. They are 8 points clear of the 9 spot, and who, exactly, is stepping up to claim their spot in the playoffs?

I still think the Caps have a substantial chance to win the Southeast, and I think they are virtually assured of a spot in the playoffs. You can quibble on the former opinion, but you have absolutely no grounds to quibble with the latter.

by cajuncook on Feb 2, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

8 points is not a huge chasm and there are 5 games left against playoff teams below us and on the bubble. Those 8 points could disappear very fast. I wish I did have the faith that you do, but the lack of passion and drive over most of this season does not leave me feeling very warm and fuzzy.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

If I hadn’t already done a hell of a lot of number crunching I might be inclined to find out exactly where the Caps stand, post losing streak, in terms of points earned. Frankly, I find it extremely hard to believe 16 out of 34 points would qualify for top 6. Just glancing at the standings, Tampa, Vancouver, Detroit, Philly, Pittsburgh, Boston, Montreal, Buffalo, Dallas, Anaheim, Calgary and Chicago all appear to have more points in their last 17 games than our 16 points in 17 games. Just worth noting: 88 points is probably going to be close to the minimum for qualification and that is 1.07 points per game. 16/17=.94. Not gonna cut the mustard if a couple of teams at the bottom get hot. You know, like we did a few years back.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Where are you getting 16? I have 24 points from 18 games. I know this is hard to believe, but that 24 points puts them two Eastern Conference teams, Boston and TB, and ties them with Pittsburgh. It’s ahead of Philly. It’s tied for seventh in the NHL.

by cajuncook on Feb 2, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

puts them behind two EC teams. D’oh.

by cajuncook on Feb 2, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

you are correct. 4.5 hours of sleep doesn’t aid the counting skills so well.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Not for nothing, Philly made a coaching change last year…

by Murshawursha on Feb 2, 2011 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

So who’s the Peter Laviolette equivalent that would be a “needed catalyst”?

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s the trick, isn’t it. I don’t think I know enough about the options out there to really propose and back up a solution, but I bet one could be found.

In the interest of discussion, I’ll toss Bob Hartley and Guy Carbonneau out there. Hartley seems like he’d be a bit harder on the guys than Bruce is (which I think would be a good thing), and he’s coached Kovalchuk, which would hopefully mean he could deal well with Ovie.

Carbonneau… Well, IIRC he coached a Montreal team with a good amount of skill and a league-leading powerplay to a division championship and got an Adams nomination to boot.

by Murshawursha on Feb 2, 2011 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

And both of those guys have been out of work for three and two years, (respectively) while Lavs was a year and a day out. I’d bet that there’d be some rust shaking that both would have to do to bring in any of their own touches, thus putting the team in a worse position than it is now.

As one who’s wondered about BB’s future before I’m all for a change, but I think one like that now does more harm than good, and I’m far from sold on Woods/French being Byls clones that would fit the bill.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Not much reason to let him go now.

A Power Play that has sucked – and that is not hyperbole considering who is out there – since before the Montreal series? Everyone points to that series as when it started to go downhill, but it was failing significantly before that and has been very bad ever since.

A woeful offense (you can find stats for that all over the thread).

We were supposed to win the SC last year – now we’re ready to settle for a wasted season (missed playoffs) before we make a change?

I’ve asked this before, but can anyone point out anything that shows that Bruce Boudreau has answers for the offensive problems facing the squad that was being compared to the Oilers of the early eighties?

I can resist anything, except temptation.

by alisterio on Feb 2, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

No love for his defensive improvement?

by Brainumbc on Feb 3, 2011 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

You can give up 1 or 2 goals a game all season and lose if you can’t score 3.

by wittcap79 on Feb 3, 2011 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Were it not at the expense of the offense – sure. But doesn’t he seem out of answers to you?

I can resist anything, except temptation.

by alisterio on Feb 4, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

No.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 7, 2011 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

he’s far from perfect

But I think if it looks like the caps are getting back on track for REAL right now, then their mid season slump might just be exactly what everyone was hoping… 10-20 games of adjusting to a more balanced game, faltering a bit, and coming out of it much wiser.

And the only real way to know if it’s for REAL for real is the playoffs. If we were in 7, 8, 9 place then I might be worried but I wouldn’t even think of replacing him until after one more good shot at the playoffs. He deserves at least that for everything he’s done for the team.

Besides, dumping him means replacing him with someone else, which is taking a pretty big change in itself and it better be someone that’s money. I dunno what coaches are on the market right now better than BB.

Can anyone think of any?

by Brainumbc on Feb 7, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Still, no?

I can resist anything, except temptation.

by alisterio on Feb 14, 2011 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

Remember that when BB took over for Hanlon, at first he wasn’t going to change anything, then said “screw this” and changed up the system completely. Maybe I’m optimistic, but considering how terribly (in terms of wins) this system is working now, I think he’ll come to a point where he realizes that the team needs to open it up more and be more aggressive. While that may just get the team to where it was in 09-10, the defensive zone coverage at least looks much improved. The PK won’t sink the team. And the PP has to start clicking, since no team is bad enough or dumb enough to have a 10%-true-talent power play.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 14, 2011 7:36 AM EST up reply actions  

You are more optimistic than I – and maybe it’s not that he’s out of answers, but that they have turned him off.

I don’t buy that the PP “has to” do anything. The current malaise started well before the MTL game and has sucked ever since. Does ANY team play their most prolific goal scorer out on the point. More importantly, would any coach continue to do so with such a dreadful PP?

I can resist anything, except temptation.

by alisterio on Feb 14, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

The current malaise started well before the MTL game and has sucked ever since.

It’s at about 10% during this bad stretch. It’s at ~17% for the season. That means there must have been a really good stretch somewhere in there.

Does ANY team play their most prolific goal scorer out on the point. More importantly, would any coach continue to do so with such a dreadful PP?

No team has more talent on their top PP unit. And with all the PPGs Ovechkin continued to get, him at the point hasn’t mattered until, well, now.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.

by red army line on Feb 14, 2011 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

A few things cross my mind as I consider this question.

1. Is the coach failing or are the players failing? This, my friends, is the biggest conundrum with the Capitals. Players haven’t changed. Systems have changed on defense, but do not appear to have changed on offense. Do the systems need changing or do the players need to step up?

2. Is now the right time? On this, I think not. If the Capitals were going to fire Boudreau, I would have preferred they did it during the all-star break. That would have given the coach time to get up to speed. To fire now, wouldn’t seem to make sense and might cause the team to take a step back.

3. Is there a clear, logical, multi-year successor? Yes, I believe you should make the change for the long term, not just to jump start this season. I have to imagine GMGM has ideas, but it would seem like summertime would be better to make a more calculated decision.

4. What is the value of long-term coaching gigs? In sports today, coaches seem to come and go. Coaches like Ruff, Trotz, Andy Reid, Tony LaRussa, Jerry Sloan, Phil Jackson and Jeff Fisher (until last week) are exceptionally rare. Looking at that list, however, I see on LaRussa and Jackson with championships (and Jackson had Jordan and Kobe!). In the past you could point to Chuck Noll, Tom Landry, Don Shula, Scotty Bowman, Casey Stengel, Sparky Anderson, Red Auerbach, etc. Not today. I’m not convinced it makes a difference.

Which leads to perhaps a different question – should GMGM go? Is his time past?

In the end, I say “no” to firing Boudreau now and “no” to firing GMGM now. If we miss the playoffs, of course, all bets are off.

Life With Spidey -- a blog about sports, travel, work, family and fun.
Representing Caps fandom in the Gateway to the West.

by STLSpidey on Feb 2, 2011 8:18 AM EST reply actions  

Related to Lindy Ruff, I’m surprised this hasn’t gotten more talk in league circles.

If Deazy actually DOES sign, I'll do the stanky leg, and I'm the whitest guy I know.

by Bald Pollack on Feb 2, 2011 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting.

One can only speculate if that’s altruistic (“I don’t deserve it yet”), speculative (“I’ll do well and can earn more later’) or uncertain (”I’m not sure I want to do this any longer.")

Life With Spidey -- a blog about sports, travel, work, family and fun.
Representing Caps fandom in the Gateway to the West.

by STLSpidey on Feb 2, 2011 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe he’s just taking Sasha’s lead and doesn’t want anymore long term commitments.

The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Contributor at Five For Howling.

by Carl Putnam on Feb 2, 2011 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Unsure where GMGM fits into this discussion. I think/hope we all agree that he has done monstrously well at identifying, signing, and drafting talent as well or better than the vast majority of NHL GMs. The Capitals are for sure (at the very least) playoff contenders every year for years to come. I’m not sure there are many front offices that can compete with his: Detroit and Pittsburgh? Maybe Nashville given the awful situation that team is in? I know Ted believes this, since his mantra is essentially: it is a matter of time. I tend to agree with that wrt Boudreau, too, but I feel like no matter what happens in the final 30 games, his success will be judged in the postseason this year. There’s no way, in my opinion, that he won’t be given the chance to succeed in the playoffs this year.

by cajuncook on Feb 2, 2011 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Is the coach failing or are the players failing? This, my friends, is the biggest conundrum with the Capitals.

Actually, this is completely irrelevant. If the players are failing, it’s the coaches fault – even if it’s really not. You simply cannot make massive roster changes mid-season. It’s on the coaching staff at this point.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh…there’s a reason everyone who’s looked at coaching changes since the lockout concludes that on average, a new coach hardly makes a difference. If the players are sucking, they’ll likely continue.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 7, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

But sometimes you know it’s gotta be at least a little bit of coaching. Hell. to come out of the downward spiral that we were in when BB first took over.

Then again, getting Huet and Fedorov the last two months of that stretch probably helped a little bit too. wink wink

by Brainumbc on Feb 7, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

In sports today, coaches seem to come and go.

Comparisons to other sports are irrelevant. The impact of coaches and systems vary from sport to sport. Football coaches probably have the most impact, followed by hockey, then basketball (whatever the hell that is) and baseball. There is almost zero evidence that baseball managers have a significant impact on their team’s performance one way or the other.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

There is almost zero evidence that baseball managers have a significant impact

How do you figure? Orioles fans would point at pre Buck Showalter and post Buck Showalter records last season as an argument. I’d argue Baseball managers have a big impact because of the way they have to maintain the roster each game, matching relivers in late innings, etc.

www.wiseadvertising.com

Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.

by Sombrero Guy on Feb 2, 2011 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

While the Os were significantly better under Buck than before him…they still didn’t sniff .500 or the playoffs. I couldn’t find statistics on it, but other than Jack McKeon in 2003(and that was a home run as the Marlins won the Series), I can’t think of an instance in which a MLB team fired their coach halfway and made the playoffs.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

IIRC sabermetrics seem to suggest baseball managers have about a 4 or 5 game effect on the standings which usually doesn’t mean much. Players don’t really show much of a bounce in stats that’s clearly the effect of a manager change. Now, off-field effects, sure, you probably get that.

This sig is brought to you by... Frungy, The Sport of Kings!

by apk3000 on Feb 2, 2011 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

practically 0 MLB teams make the playoffs though, so that is a rough argument to make. I’d wager that changing divisions would have a higher impact than any player or managerial changes on, for example, the orioles making the playoffs.

If it's too loud, turn it down.

by renstar on Feb 3, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Here.

Scroll down to the bottom of page 163. This is simply a write-up of stuff that I’ve seen said informally all over the place.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Apologies in advance for the Wall o' Text...

I’m losing faith in Bruce fairly rapidly here. I’m not sure what’s happening in DC is his fault, but I think a reasonable case can be made that it is.

I know that a large number of people in Caps Nation have been clamoring for a switch to a more defensive style much like the one Bruce has adopted now. What I don’t understand is WHY. The Capitals have played four playoff series under Boudreau. His first season, the Caps went out in 7 to Philadelphia. Yeah, it was sad, but at that point, even making the playoffs was an accomplishment and I don’t think anybody was all that disappointed in the loss. Second season, we beat New York in 7 and then lost to Pitt in 7 with an anti-climactic finish to one of the best playoff series I’ve ever seen. Sure, it was heartbreaking, but I still remember the standing ovation the Caps got as they left the ice at the end of game 7. Again, I don’t think anyone felt we underachieved.

So, to recap: A loss in game 7 after a Cinderella year where even being there was considered an accomplishment, after which Boudreau was awarded the Jack Adams for said Cinderella season. A win in 7 games, followed by a heartbreaking loss to a hated rival and the eventual Stanley Cup Champion. The general consensus after both, IIRC, was that we fought as well as could be expected.

Then, we have last season’s playoffs. After fireworks in the first four games, our offense ran away and hid for the last three, scoring a total of three goals. The powerplay also ran away and hid, going something ridiculously bad like 1-60something (the exact number escapes me). This, alone of the playoffs under Bruce, was considered a huge disappointment.

So after playing a run-and-gun system for three seasons, playing up to or beyond our potential in two of the three, and then seriously underachieving and losing in the third because our offense couldn’t get it done in the last three games and our powerplay couldn’t get it done at all… Why in the hell did we decide we needed to play more DEFENSE? I realize I don’t have the hockey smarts of most of the community here, but I like to think I have at least a reasonably good knowledge of the game, and not once in the last three seasons did I think “Damn, if only our defense would play better.” Last season, it was “Why isn’t the puck going in, and GODF**KINGDAMMITWHYCAN’TWESCOREAPOWERPLAYGOAL?!”

What do you know, a little more than half a season later, I’m still shouting that. So despite an overhaul of the system, the problems that (IMHO) lost us the Montreal series have still not been remedied. The more I watch this team, the more I worry that Bruce really doesn’t have a plan, he’s just trying to find something that works, throwing darts blindfolded and hoping he hits the bullseye. His first instinct when things go wrong seems to be scrambling the lines and hoping to catch lightning in a bottle rather than strategic changes.

And I mean, the same problems have been plaguing this team since December with not a lot of change or improvement. Maybe that’s the players, but I’m not convinced. And even if it is,you can’t very well fire all of them, can you? I’m starting to feel like something’s got to change, and it makes the most sense to me for that something to be Bruce. But what do I know? If I knew anything about the game, I’d be in it.A

by Murshawursha on Feb 2, 2011 9:53 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I find it interesting that the team went from an extreme offense system to an (attempted) extreme defense system. I appreciate the improved penalty kill and overall defensive responsibility that has lowered the number of goals against, but surely there must be a hybrid system that plays to the Caps’ strenghts at both ends of the ice.

(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)

by oldemystix on Feb 2, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I find it interesting that the team went from an extreme offense system to an (attempted) extreme defense system.

They haven’t. They occasionally implement the trap when they’ve got a lead. They haven’t suddenly become Ken Hitchcock’s Blue Jackets or Jacques Lemaire’s Devils.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that a large number of people in Caps Nation have been clamoring for a switch to a more defensive style much like the one Bruce has adopted now. What I don’t understand is WHY.

Because this team doesn’t have enough offensive talent to win on offensive talent alone. The Caps shouldn’t need to trap for 2 out of every 3 periods of hockey and, for the most part, they don’t. The Caps occasionally played the trap last night, but it was when they had a lead and it was primarily limited to situations wherein Montreal had clear puck possession.

Then, we have last season’s playoffs. After fireworks in the first four games, our offense ran away and hid for the last three, scoring a total of three goals. The powerplay also ran away and hid, going something ridiculously bad like 1-60something (the exact number escapes me).

Offense tends to have hot and cold streaks. Defense (not goaltending, but defense) generally does not. Playing better defensively gives the Caps the ability to weather the inevitable cold streak.

So after playing a run-and-gun system for three seasons, playing up to or beyond our potential in two of the three, and then seriously underachieving and losing in the third because our offense couldn’t get it done in the last three games and our powerplay couldn’t get it done at all… Why in the hell did we decide we needed to play more DEFENSE?

Eight game losing streaks and generally uninspired play through the first half of the season will do that to you. Without improved defense, this team has very little chance of winning when the scoring dries up. If the Caps can kill penalties and shut other teams down 5v5, then Ovie doesn’t need to put up 3 points a game. Right now, it doesn’t look as though he’s capable of that, which means that improving the defense is the only thing the coaching staff can do to make this team win, barring going back in time and extracting 07-08 Ovie’s mojo, then bringing it back to the present.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess it comes down to the question of whether we aren’t scoring because the offense in in a cold streak, or we aren’t scoring because of the new system.

“Improving the defense is the only thing the coaching staff can do to make this team win.”

^That would be a hell of a lot more comforting if the team was actually winning against teams that mattered.

by Murshawursha on Feb 2, 2011 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

They were not scoring before the new system. The new system was put in place so that they were not losing 7-0, or 5-0 and to give them a chance to stay in the game when they can only muster a goal or two.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. With a few exceptions, and ignoring Semin’s brief hot streak in November, the Caps’ offense has been pretty miserable all year.

Less drama, more hockey

by SeattleCapsFan on Feb 3, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Talking about Ovi needing to put up 3 points a game. Since December, it’s been impossible for the team to put up 3 points a game, much less any one single individual performing that feat.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 2, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Most Intelligent Response

that I have heard on this site….you are absolutely correct and I am not a CAPS fan.

BB needs to fired. This team has alot of talent and the problem is that to be honest, I dont think hes a very knowledgeable coach. Every time I read the papers it is, “Well we played a good game but we didnt get the breaks or the bounces.” How long do u want to read that before you are like, ok do u have a actual hockey IQ? Can I get an answer other than we got unlucky?

I think you also need guys like Backstrom and Semin to get pissed off…they are too soft. Find your balls…

To be honest I’d love the Caps to lose in the 1st round again…and they will unless they get rid of that fat turd or they turn the corner somehow…

What man is a man who does not make the world better

by CatsoverCaps on Feb 15, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Related—coaches tend to have a minimal change on their team’s Fenwick% (suggesting coaches tend to get fired after a terrible stretch of bad team shooting luck).

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 2, 2011 10:13 AM EST reply actions  

Just wondering, but does that shooting luck tend to improve at a statistically interesting rate after the coaching changes?

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 2, 2011 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Without knowing the actual answer to this: no. I’m sure there’s regression to the mean, but I would be beyond shocked if a coaching change induced above-standard luck at a statistically relevant rate.

by cajuncook on Feb 2, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I wouldn’t figure there would be, but we’ve been surprised by numbers. It would go some distance to the axiom that “you make your own luck” though, as a coaching change tends to make the players go a little sharper for a while afterward.

by J.J. from Kansas on Feb 2, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I think so, but not above the mean. At least, that’s what I’d guess.

That is to say, we’re pretty much assured the shooting rates improve above the poor rate that got the coach fired, but not like last year’s Caps, 11% at evens.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 2, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

No. Absolutely not.

Bottom line, I’m all for BB BB getting the boot if we lose in this year’s playoffs again in either the first or second round. This year has been too many terrible Mercedes and Hadeed carpet ads and not enough actual coaching for BBQ Sauce Boudreau. Love the personality, even gave up a prime parking spot for him once, per his request, at a Kettlers blood drive, but he hasn’t shown himself to be quick on his feet, strategy-wise. “I’d have bet my house we wouldn’t have gone 1-for-33 on the power play [against Montreal].” Well, he must still be homeless becaues that percentage has more or less been the same since last playoffs, and good enough for bottom third in the league.

Be that as it may, you DO NOT, under ANY circumstances, fire a coach that has a Team headed to the playoffs, even in the WORST CASE scenario. It’s just not done. Ever. For any reason. Ever. If they were out of the picture, then fine. But they’re not, not even close. We’re fifth in the East guys. Fifth. And stregth of schedule be damned, we always play up to the talent we face and down to those basement dwellers, so look for our game to be improving very soon.

Lastly, even if everything goes to hell in a hand basket and we continue to suck big donkey balls at Verizon and away, 93 points is still a playoff spot in the Eastern Conference. At least every year since the lockout with exception to the 2007-2008 season. So: calm. the frick. down. people.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 2, 2011 11:51 AM EST reply actions  

PS

Great job capsfansteve on assembling all these stats. That’s no small feat and your analysis is much appreciated.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 2, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Couple of things.
1. you should’ve made BB walk…he could clearly use the exercise ;)
2. Do we really play up to the talent anymore? The answer would assuredly be yes in 08/09 and 09/10. Looking only at Dec. 1 on against playoff caliber teams: Dallas-uneven play. Colorado as previously mentioned, we played horribly for 2 periods and then came back with a flurry. Wet the bed against the rangers. Same early awfulness late charge that wasn’t quite enough against Boston. Pitt, MTL, Pitt: all games I thought the team played well for the majority of the contest. 2 straight whitewashes against Tampa. Vancouver and Philly= see: Colorado, Boston. Rangers=lazy Caps. Then there was last night which started so well…and yeah… So lets see, 3-7-3 our last 13 against playoff contenders and in only 3 of those games was there not a significant stretch of the Capitals being lazy asses. Hard to make the assertion that we “play up to the opponent” of late.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Related: this is not the team that we hope to go into the playoffs with. We’re missing Alexander Semin, Eric Fehr and 2nd C coming in trade. Ovechkin and Backstrom are having career slumps.

This team is going to the playoffs and the team will re-evaluate coaching after the playoffs. I’m on board with firing Boudreau if the Caps don’t advance to the conference finals.

by Joran on Feb 2, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Related: this is not the team that we hope to go into the playoffs with.

Related: the Habs team we played last night was not the team they hoped to go into the playoffs with, either. No Cammalleri, Markov or Gorges.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t hold my breath on that 2C either.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d say chances are over 90% of a 2C coming in before the deadline. GMGM and BB have to see that we don’t have a 2C solution right now.

Matt Bradley: He has sensitive skin, no?

by timmyv38 on Feb 2, 2011 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That doesn’t mean that one worth getting will be available for what they are willing to part with.

by SethB on Feb 2, 2011 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Any 2C who can even do a decent job is better than what we have. And there is a few of those available.

Matt Bradley: He has sensitive skin, no?

by timmyv38 on Feb 2, 2011 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Be that as it may, you DO NOT, under ANY circumstances, fire a coach that has a Team headed to the playoffs, even in the WORST CASE scenario. It’s just not done. Ever. For any reason. Ever.

Lou Lamoriello, Larry Robinson and their Stanley Cup banner would beg to differ.

Lastly, even if everything goes to hell in a hand basket and we continue to suck big donkey balls at Verizon and away, 93 points is still a playoff spot in the Eastern Conference. At least every year since the lockout with exception to the 2007-2008 season. So: calm. the frick. down. people.

With all objective calmness, a team with this talent level barely scraping into the playoffs with 93 points and essentially zero probability of winning the Cup ought to be considered an abject failure. Ask the Ottawa Senators or the San Jose Sharks how “just making the playoffs” feels as you realize that your window has slammed shut.

The Caps have this season to win with this team. Laich, Knuble, Brads, Gordo, Hannan, (should have been Poti and Erskine on here, sigh). . . all UFAs. Several RFAs.

Maybe Johansson and/or Perreault mature. Maybe Eakin or Kuznetsov come up and light the league afire. Maybe, maybe, maybe. This team has a window to win, and it’s not going to be open forever. Calm, outraged, somewhere in the middle – this fact is inescapable. The Young Guns won’t be young forever.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   3 recs

Lou Lamoriello, Larry Robinson and their Stanley Cup banner would beg to differ.

As do Ray Shero, Dan Bylsma and their Stanley Cup rings.

Release the Mackan!

by Killer_Carlson on Feb 2, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The difference is – that team wasn’t headed to the playoffs at the time of the coaching change.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 3, 2011 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

They were in that 7-10 bubble, but do you honestly think the Pens would have missed the playoffs without a coaching change? I don’t.

Release the Mackan!

by Killer_Carlson on Feb 3, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you, KC. I think they would have found a way to squeak into at least 8th place. Given that the Panthers were struggling. And Buffalo fell out of contention after Ryan Miller got hurt.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 3, 2011 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I agree that the Pens probably would have made it either way – I was just going by the qualifications of the original argument.

I blame Schultz

by D'ohboy on Feb 5, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

That would have been a statistical miracle and would have been highly doubtful. They were hovering between 11th and 14th in the East when the winds of change began to blow, and not heading in the right direction to make any sort of tangible push. Therrin was a scapegoat for sure, but they needed some sort of jolt to awaken their collective senses, and sans that they would not have made it.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Their Corsi under Therrien was ~51% I think, under Bylsma they were about 56%. I do think they would have still made the postseason, but just barely.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 12, 2011 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I should have known...

…that if I used an absolute D’ohboy would have been the only one to dig up a pre-lockout reference to the contrary. Well done ;o)

However, obviously we can all agree that is the glaring exception to the rule and 99.9% of the time not the norm. Hate to say it, but I think squeeking in at 93 points and getting obliterated could be one of the best things that could happen to us. I liken it to when we lost Danius Zubrus. On paper he seemed to be heading into the right direction, having ramped up to 20 and 23 goal season just prior to becoming an UFA. Nevertheless, GM GM made the right call and passed on what would become a $3.4 million 12-goal scorer.

We have a LOT of passengers on the Team right now, and Ovie and Backs are not some of them. They need more consistent talent to go along with them. Put simply, if Brendan Morrison were still on our Team and producing the way he is in Calgary right now, he would be 4th on Team-wide scoring right now. FOURTH. Does that speak to how poorly the rest of our Team is doing? They need to pony up or realize the last stop for this glory ride is in 3-4 months and change.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

PS

Loved and rec’d the last paragraph, D’ohboy. It is a sobering truth.

"Baseball was my first love... hockey is a sultry temptress and stole my heart." - Corey Masisak

by Scoops on Feb 11, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree completely. This team does not have to win this year, and probably could not from day one. The chance to win was probably when they lost in 7 games to Pittsburgh two years ago. That was the season they had the right offense and the right goaltending, but not enough defense. They had the right mix of youth and veteran skills. This year’s team, with this skill set and head problems, is done.

They don’t work hard enough, they don’t have enough heart, they’ve never played a desperate game and the confidence they had prior to last year’s playoffs is all but gone. No in-season coaching change will fix all of these things. Stranger turnarounds have happened, but there isn’t any evidence that the players or the coaches know how to right the ship.

The truth is that the Caps best chance to win in is two-three years from now. At that point, Alzner and Carlson will be coming into their prime. The stable of younger players, like Orlov, Galiev, Carrier and Kuznetzov will be emerging and two of the three yojng goaltenders will have established themselves. Green, Johansson, Fehr and Laich will have either made the jump to the next level or they’ll be long gone, and the next set of “Young Guns” will kick them to the curb.

by NHL Observer on Feb 13, 2011 3:11 AM EST up reply actions  

As rare as it is, Montreal did fire Carbonneau 2 years ago when they were in the playoff picture. They had gotten off to a great start that year, then had a horrible stretch in February, fired him, and the team ended up in 8th place in the Conference and were swept in 4 straight by the Bruins.

After the season, they let many of their impending free agents walk, including Kovalev and Koivu.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 2, 2011 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the most viable candidate, IF Boudreau was canned this season (and even if I think he should, he won’t) would have to be Bob Hartley. Don’t get more of the same from within the organization, even if it worked before a few years ago.

Hartley had worked with an extremely talented Colorado team in the early ’00s, eventually getting them over the hump after two appearances in the conference finals. His last coaching endeavor was a failure in Atlanta, but I would challenge anyone to give me names who could have done better with that organization.

This team won’t respond to a taskmaster like Keenan or Hitchcock, and would be a step in the wrong direction. But there HAS to be some accountability. As the OP put it, we don’t know what’s going on in the locker room. But from my standpoint, this team doesn’t seem like it has to answer for anything it does on the ice. There are no repercussions for inconsistent and sometimes lazy efforts in both zones (even if the system is more defensively oriented now). Perhaps a coach like Hartley could create a change.

by Charlie Foxtrot on Feb 2, 2011 1:18 PM EST reply actions  

Otherwise Ted Nolan is out there. Andy Murray is out there.

I am on the fence as to whether to do it now or later, but have a feeling it’s coming by May any way you slice it.

Choking since 1985.

by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Ted Nolan is a no chance. Guy has a rep as a GM killer, warranted or not.

by Charlie Foxtrot on Feb 2, 2011 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that’s way overblown. He didn’t kill mighty Garth Snow did he? :-)

Choking since 1985.

by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Garth Snow will exist as the Islanders GM long after the rapture.

by Charlie Foxtrot on Feb 2, 2011 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I think if Bruce were to get fired, it would had to have happened during the losing streak. At this point i think you wait to see how they finish the season and then Ted needs to make a decision for the good of the franchise on whether to get rid of Bruce and or George. Keep in mind it was Abe that hired George, not Ted.

In Soviet Russia you don't score goal, goal score you.

by ovechkinmvp on Feb 2, 2011 6:40 PM EST reply actions  

normally I’d agree…but that was not exactly a prototypical losing streak. We had cameras in the locker room and we were gearing up for the winter classic. That would not have been a good time to fire a coach.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

would’ve made for some good TV though.

by capsfansteve on Feb 2, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Keep in mind it was Abe that hired George, not Ted.

Also keep in mind that Ted has kept George on the payroll for the last 11 years and that successful franchises tend to have stability in management.

T-R-A-P: TRAP, TRAP, TRAP!!!

by D'ohboy on Feb 2, 2011 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's take a step back ...

Seriously, let’s take a step back from the ledge here, people. There are too many of us here asking whether Boudreau should get fired, or if the team should trade everything but the kitchen sink for a 2nd line center, or that the world is ending because they’re not leading the SE Division. Calm down.

The reality here is that the Capitals are more than likely to make the playoffs. If they miss the playoffs, it will be because of some major calamity, but as it stands now, the Caps are just fine to make the playoffs. Just because Ovechkin isn’t leading the league or in the top 5 in goals is no indication that he’s lost his touch. Same goes for Backstrom. Same goes for the fact that the Caps are middling in offense, but are #8 in GA and #2 on PK. I think many of us need to take the pill that chills and remember it’s the playoffs that matter, and right now, a defensive system is one that will pay dividends in the long run. It’s how Montreal won the series last year. It’s how Philadelphia made it from last-minute berth to Eastern Conference Champions. It’s how so many of us complained the Caps needed to play after the Montreal series was over. Yet, as the Capitals stand in 5th place in the East, we clamor for Boudreau’s head. Please.

Now, I’m not claiming the Caps will make the Stanley Cup Finals. Too much can happen when the playoffs come to make that kind of claim. No, I’m merely saying that we, as a fanbase, need to take a deep breath and relax a bit. there are 30 more games left. That’s 60 more points and 68 more days left on the calendar. Give it some time.

I wish my family wasn't from Philly and Pittsburgh =(

by IrishCreme on Feb 4, 2011 1:32 PM EST reply actions  

Last year’s Flyers were probably not a typical 8th seed but rather a good team who was having a bad season, especially during December when they let Coach Stevens go. There was likely enough hysteria on Flyers boards then. I remember reading articles where they were talking about the fact that their team captain and other young stars were spending too much time partying; etc. and their captain should have the “C” removed. And Pronger complaining about the work ethic.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 5, 2011 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

the Caps are middling in offense, but are #8 in GA and #2 on PK.

The problem with your argument is that, as unsustainable as the Caps’ bad luck on offense has been, so has been their luck in keeping the puck out of their net. Varly isn’t going to keep up a nearly .950 Sv % over the long run.

Right now, the concern is less about results and more about process. This team has had bad process for years, but got good results. Right now, both the process and the results look crappy – one only hopes that the team is going through a transition period to a better process and that eventually the results will follow.

About the “panicking” comment – I’m getting a little sick of people telling others not to panic. I don’t really hear panic in this post or the comments, mostly what I hear is valid concern and the occasional foray into resigned acceptance that this just isn’t the Caps’ year and the reasoned conclusion that changes need to be made.

The problems evinced by this team are nothing new and haven’t been dealt with in a significant way during Boudreau’s tenure. Every year that goes by without winning a Cup is one less year that the Caps have with this core of players. I know it seems like Ovie, Backstrom and Green will never get old, but believe me, they will. And it’ll happen sooner than you think. If the team knows that Boudreau isn’t the coach to lead them to the Cup, changes need to happen sooner rather than later.

Give it some time.

When the Caps got dumped by the Flyers in the first round, everyone said, “they’re young and inexperienced – give it some time.” When the Caps came out flat against the Rangers, then lost to the Pens, lots of people said, “that’s progress, they lost to a better team, give it some time.” When the Caps got upset by the Habs, folks said, “they ran into a hot goalie, give it some time and come back next year.” Give it some time. . .

And yet, every year we have the same discussions, over and over and over again. Every year, we wonder why this team can’t give anything close to consistent effort. Every year, we wonder why the Caps go away from doing the little things that help teams win games for weeks and months at a time. Every year, we wonder why the Caps seem content with spacing out for 2/3 to 3/4 of every game, only to “turn it on” when they want and come away with a close win or an OT/SO loss. Every year, we wonder why the Caps come into the playoffs flat and get caught off-balance and have to scramble to get back into a series. Every year we wonder why the Caps are seemingly outcoached in the playoffs.

a defensive system is one that will pay dividends in the long run. It’s how Montreal won the series last year. It’s how Philadelphia made it from last-minute berth to Eastern Conference Champions. It’s how so many of us complained the Caps needed to play after the Montreal series was over. Yet, as the Capitals stand in 5th place in the East, we clamor for Boudreau’s head. Please.

The defensive system Montreal employed helped, but it also helped that Halak and Cammalleri played out of their minds and that Boudreau and his players failed to adjust to the tactics Montreal was using. Philadelphia did/does not play the kind of trapping system the Caps have implemented. Neither did Chicago, or Vancouver. Nobody, at least nobody I heard, was complaining about the Caps’ lack of defense against Montreal. We complained that the Caps lost focus early in games, fell into a hole, then failed to use power play opportunities to catch up. We complained because Ovie kept doing the same move, over and over and over again – the same move that he’s been using with no success this year.

My problem with this team and Boudreau as a coach is that the only things they do with consistency are their bad habits. For three years, the Caps’ offense has gone on hiatus at various points. Every single time, pundits, fans, the team and their coaches all say, "we need to get more traffic in front and get pucks to the net. . . " and yet somehow it never seems to happen with any consistency. For three years, we’ve watched the Caps lose focus for a period and either fall into early holes or give up goals late to turn a 2-3 goal lead into a tie game.

At some point, after three years of watching the same bad habits come out time and time again, someone needs to say “enough.” The culture of the team needs to change. The lack of focus needs to be addressed. The “woe is us” attitude when anything goes awry needs to stop. The team needs to be better prepared, or they need to know that there will be consequences if they fail to implement the coaches’ plan. On bad teams, the star players do what they want. On good teams, when the star players fail to execute the plan, coaches hold them accountable. On great teams (Wings), the star players just don’t fail to execute the plan. Every time the Caps get down, every star player on this team goes into “fuck it, I’ve got this” mode and plays like an individual. It starts at the top with Ovechkin, and not a single coach does anything to stop it – far from it, they encourage it by allowing him to skate ludicrously long shifts.

How much more of this is it going to take before the management wakes up and realizes that this team doesn’t need a jolly fat uncle, they need a coach. They need a leader who will tell them, nay force them, to do what’s needed to win. Or else.

My guess is that it’s shortly after we get knocked out of the playoffs in the first or second round.

I blame Schultz

by D'ohboy on Feb 5, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   3 recs

I harp on this a lot, but the 07-08 and 08-09 teams were legitimately Stanley Cup contenders and truly elite. Even with Nylander, even before Fedorov. And I still don’t understand what changed over the 2009 offseason to make this team only good-not-great.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 7, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Clark for Perreault!

by Brainumbc on Feb 7, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

So last year’s President’s Trophy team only qualified as “good” instead of great! While our 2007-2008 edition was good and had such an amazing comeback from such a horrible start, I had actually considered last year’s group to be a better team overall.

Of course, we’re wondering what happened this year. Most of our core guys are still under Age 27 so we would not have expected them to hit their peak just yet.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 7, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s the whole underlying numbers deal. Caps last year shot something like 4 standard deviations above the mean—once in a lifetime type deal there, I guess—and their shooting percentage if memory serves actually increased, somehow, when they were trailing. The 07-09 teams legitimately dominated play like an elite team.

My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays

by red army line on Feb 7, 2011 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Kozlov was pretty good at possession. Knuble isn’t as much. I still think I’d rather have Knuble, but it’s definitely a factor.

Fedorov was excellent at possession. Pu-pu platter the Caps have been rolling out at 2C haven’t been as much.

Green had an outstanding possession year in addition to a crazy high shooting percentage in his 31 goal campaign.

Guys grew out of the ELCs and forced the rest of the roster to be cheaper. Generally speaking, cheaper players aren’t as good. If Anton Gustafsson is a better draft pick, the Caps are probably edging towards the elite team status right now.

Look at Chicago – replacing Ladd (this one was big), Versteeg, Madden, Buff, and the others with players off the scrap heap (Pisani etc) and fringish draft picks (Skille etc) made them a very good possession team instead of a great one. The top of the lineup didn’t change at all. Those guys that were the face of the Cup run are all still there – Toews, Hossa, Kane, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, Bolland, etc. The difference is in the depth guys and it’s taken them from a 57% Fenwick team to a 53.7% Fenwick team. Very good, but not great.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Feb 9, 2011 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

The upshoot is that the bottom of the roster really, really matters. That’s why deals to guys like Steckel and Erskine and Sloan drive me up the goddamn wall. The difference between the elite teams and the merely good is so small. It’s a few good roster decisions on the third line, or an upgrade on D. Every dollar counts and it really shows over the course of the season.

For that reason, I really think the team should move Semin for younger, cheaper assets. We know what he is and how good he is, but he’s delivering roughly league-average value for salary. You don’t win Cups with that kind of contract, you win Cups with value contracts.

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box

by Knee high to a duck on Feb 9, 2011 8:24 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

For that reason, I really think the team should move Semin for younger, cheaper assets

But not before we insert a computer chip in his brain that lets us control exactly when he will take a penalty

by Brainumbc on Feb 10, 2011 7:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Sports fans are a fickle bunch.

Last season: “This run-and-gun offensive team won’t be able to win in the playoffs. The President’s trophy is a curse. Winning so many regular season games just proves that the team plays a style built for the regular season.”

This season: “Where did the offense go? Why aren’t we in first place? Fire somebody! Trade somebody!”

by AZDWK on Feb 4, 2011 7:05 PM EST reply actions  

On Boudreau, what have we here? We have a coach whose hiring seem to spark a bad, non-playoff team into a great late season run that squeaked into the playoffs. The team managed to sustain that winning percentage over the regular season for the next TWO years (and the beginning of the next year). Maintaining that pace over a three year period is certainly no fluke and indicates that Boudreau is doing something right.

He probably may not always be the best short term tactician (which may well be his weakness in the playoffs) and probably a better long term strategist (with a system that works, say 90% of the time.)

Yes, I’ll admit I wondered after Tuesday’s game, with it being the third uber low scoring loss in a row on whether he was still the right coach for our team.

Rocking the Red for teams on the banks of the Potomac and at the Gateway Arch and Singing the Blues about Hockey.

by CapsFan75 on Feb 5, 2011 4:22 PM EST reply actions  

Bruce isn't going anywhere, yet.

This is great speculation, but unless the team has another prolonged losing streak that drops the Caps out of a playoff spot, the trigger does not get pulled on Bruce during the regular season. You can bet the rent on it. Having said that, Bruce needs to show progress when it matters, which I think means this team has to get to the third round of the playoffs for him to be back next year. Anything less is treading water, and somebody is going to have to pay for lack of progress. The next coach of the Washington Capitals will in all likelihood not be an AHL guy, but probably someone very much like Lindy Ruff or Bob Hartley, an experienced NHL guy with a track record as a task master, that can adapt a system to the players on the roster. Hitchcock bends players to his system or he sits/dumps them, and that won’t fly here. The dark horse candidate, that Caps fans love to trot out, is Dale Hunter. Hunter got a courtesy call about his interest in the position in the past, but declined. He’s admitted as recently as this past fall that he is more interested in an NHL job now than in the past. Come Tax Day, Bruce is on the clock.

by NHL Observer on Feb 10, 2011 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

Defense

I dont think the Caps needed to play a more defensive style…they just need good defensmen.

Green is an offensive wizard…let him be that and put a shutdown guy who is more responsible.

Hannan is ok but he isnt a super D man…

Poti is a bandaid boy…

Erskine has had a good year but he still sux

Schultz is a bum…he is a slower skater than me…Simmonds made him look like a jackass in the Kings game.

Alzner and Carlson are solid but that is 1/3 of your D…you need atleast 6 dependable D.

What man is a man who does not make the world better

by CatsoverCaps on Feb 15, 2011 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

Caps have 5 dependable D, 6 if Erskine is playing well, 7 if Erskine is playing well and Poti is healthy. Green is good on both ends of the ice, Schultz is a great complement to Green, Carlson/Alzner are showing themselves to be as good a pair as Green/Schultz, Poti (when healthy) is a solid dman, Hannan is reliable but not fantastic, and Erskine can be solid.

Matt Bradley: He has sensitive skin, no?

by timmyv38 on Feb 15, 2011 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators