Coaching Change Winners and Losers

Oct. 7, 2011, Former head coach Bruce Boudreau talks with Jeff Halpern after practice.
Toni L. Sandys / via www.washingtonpost.com
It's been an emotional day. A good man lost his job. A legend took his place. We'll be discussing the implications of the Caps' coaching change for days to come. And until we truly get a sense for the playing style of a Dale-Hunter-coached NHL team (something Hunter himself may not have really defined yet), it'll be impossible to know what this change means for the organization.
But some of the coming changes are predictable. Here's one fan's take on the folks who stand to gain or lose from this change.
Winner - Mike Knuble. A Dale Hunter type player if there ever was one. Knuble has made the most out of his talent by sheer will. He can be depended on in any situation and has a knack for finding success in high traffic areas. I don't think Knuble will be on the fourth line too many more shifts this year.
Losers - Mathieu Perreault and Cody Eakin. Hunter has a reputation for giving his star players big minutes. That policy may not transfer entirely to the NHL -- it may have been a reflection of the realities of coaching in the OHL, where the talent difference between the best and worst players on one team can be much greater than in the NHL. But we can still expect that a Hunter-coached team will depend on its stars, and it will depend on role players who are counted on for a specific roles. Perreault and Eakin aren't stars, don't kill penalties, aren't power play specialists, and can't win faceoffs. Expect their ice time to drop.
Winner - Roman Hamrlik. I refuse to believe that this twenty-year veteran forgot how to play hockey over the last offseason. He just has to do better in a new system. Right?
Losers - Bob Woods and Mark French. These two disciples of the Boudreau school of coaching were each being groomed for a future NHL head coaching job. With the hiring of a new head coach comes a new philosophy. And if Hunter has success, he may have the opportunity to bring in his own assistants.
Winners - Brooks Laich and Mike Green. It's too easy to stop at the fact that these guys owe a huge amount to Boudreau. That's true, but it's also true that of the "core" players, these two have adjusted their game better than anyone else. Backstrom's game doesn't need changing. Laich's didn't either, really, but he got much better defensively anyway and is now much more valuable than he was a couple of years ago. Green's game absolutely did need changing, and he has become a very solid defensive player. Green and Laich can be depended on in any situation. And hopefully Hunter will find a way to reduce the physical punishment that Green absorbs every game.
Loser - The Press. Bruce Boudreau is a fantastic quote. Hunter is going to be quieter, more businesslike. It's going to be harder to write those stories. I think some of the over-the-top reaction to Boudreau's firing is just the fact that the hockey press has always rallied around the guys who make their lives easier.
Winner - Alex Ovechkin. I predict we're going to see a renewed Ovechkin. A man who has many burdens taken off of him. A man who is asked to do little more than play the game and have fun. He's a left wing, for crying out loud. He doesn't need to be his line's defensive conscience -- leave that to Backstrom. All he needs to be is Ovechkin. I predict Hunter is going to simplify things for Ovechkin, and let him cut loose and be himself.
In the end, the real winners and losers will be determined by the players themselves. They cost their coach his job. Now it is up to them how they respond to a new voice. And as with everything else for this deeply talented but (thus far) deeply flawed team, the real test is months away.
If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
29 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Loser: Joe Hadeed. Now he needs to record some new commercials!
"If only a face could talk" -- John Madden
looks like...
may be a poor choice of words. Brad Pitt isn’t that great of an actor so I’m not sure what you’re trying to say there. Granted he’s had his roles and has great presence but he’s type cast as a wacko so often it makes me wonder how much of a stretch it is for him to get into character.
Perreault and Eakin are losers because Hunter gives minutes to his star players. Fair enough. Presumably, those star players include Backstrom and MoJo, so it’s not based on age.
If you extrapolate this point, however, does this suggest that Hunter is a poor development of talent? Seems like a stretch to draw that conclusion, but if development requires playing time, will poor development result nonetheless?
Nice guys finish first, but sometimes the season is awfully long.
Follow me on Twitter.
Judging from the talent that has come out of the Knights since he took over there, I would think he’s good at developing talent. I could see him being helpful to Eakin, since he seems to base his game on hard work and energy. I’m not so sure about MP though.
Failure is always an option.
I’d like to think they (and Johansson) are about to get some great personal attention in practice.
As I recall, Dale Hunter was pretty good at faceoffs. If any one of those players could reach “mediocre” at the dot, it would hugely increase their value. You just can’t afford to put any one of them out for a defensive zone draw right now.
"Fais gros comme moi!" - Alex Ovechkin
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2011 9:39 AM EST up reply actions
In the short-term with regard to ice time, I agree with your point regarding Eakin, but I think this coaching change is a win for Eakin in terms of his future role, etc.
Completely agree. Eakin’s game strongly reminds me of Hunts’ (minus the PIMs) and though he’s been playing (capably) at LW, I have to think that if he’s ever going to cut it at the pivot, this coaching relationship is going to be very influential. But even as a wing I think he will flourish under Hunter, who will appreciate this kid’s motor.
Cross check and all call.
by bigonetimer on Nov 29, 2011 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
MP’s game IS energy, he’s a great puck pick pocket and he’s quick (he scampers). MP’s problem is that he’s tiny. He gets pushed around so often. I think refs give defenders the benefit of the doubt on their hits on him because he only comes up to their elbows most of the time. I’ve only seen him get a couple penalties from the nasty hits he takes. If he wants to be an NHLer he should probably go back to his formative years and have his parents petition his pediatrician for some HGH. Either that or put on 50 lbs of muscle in the offseason.
I shouldn’t have said energy… that was the wrong word. Eakin is fairly physical – he doesn’t seem to mind banging into people to try to get the puck. MP is good in open space, but tends to get killed along the boards. Eakin’s style seems to be one where Hunter could teach him – I don’t think that’s true of MP at this point.
Failure is always an option.
Great post. I would also put Ward and Chimera as winners, for similar reasons to Knuble. I’m very curious how/if this will affect Semin.
Failure is always an option.
I agree about Ward and Chimera.
Good thoughtful piece. Thanks Gouldie.
by capsyoungguns on Nov 29, 2011 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
Regarding Woods, I agree this is going to be an interesting time for him.
While Woods is linked to Boudreau and has been with him at many stops, Woods has been a head coach and has his own ideas that aren’t always the same as Boudreau’s. Obviously, this is a bit different because he won’t be the head coach and there is a new head coach with his own ideas/systems, etc.
Also, I think Evason is worth mentioning. This will be the third head coach Evason will be working under with the Caps having joined the team after the lockout. Hanlon, Boudreau, now Hunter…
To continue on Woods, with him not leaving at the same time, I think he has a chance to carve out a longer stay here. Watching from the outside as a fan, I’d think his personality and approach could be a good fit with Hunter’s, wait and see time, of course.
Goalies?
In the big picture, I think the goalies, as a whole, are winners. Hopefully, Hunter can manage them with a more steady hand and any renewed emphasis on backchecking, face-off wins, etc. can only be a plus. But in the particulars, by theme, it seems Voukoun is the winner (if Hunter favors a steady hand and veterans) and Neurvith is at best, a loser, but probably neutral.
Everything sounds smarter in Tikkanesse....
Hunter favors stars, but does he favor veterans? Stars and veterans aren’t the same thing. I don’t see there being many “veterans” in the OHL, given that they’re all kids. I see him being a positive influence on Neuvy because he’s used to guiding younger players. If MoJo, Eakin, Matty P., and Orlov can be winners with this change, so can Neuvy. Of all the “kids” on the current roster (call ups included) Neuvy is the only one who was in the OHL, so Hunter’s seen him play, too.
Are you saying Voukoun is a veteran but not a star? I thought otherwise….
Everything sounds smarter in Tikkanesse....
I was unclear, sorry. I was trying to say that I hadn’t heard that he favored veterans, only that he favored stars. You can be a star but not a veteran, and vice versa. Vokoun is a very good goalie and a star. But goaltending is a very different position. You can’t spread out ice time and shorten shifts. Goalies are usually in for 58+ minutes. I’m not sure how he’s played goalies in the past. It’s a little hard to compare his coaching in the OHL to how he’d play a 35 year old veteran. Then again, I’ve heard he favors role players as well, so perhaps you can be a veteran and a role player but not a star and still get a lot of ice time.
Wasn’t the word on Gabby that goaltending was greek to him? He didn’t know what to do with them and didn’t have patience for goaltending foibles.
Pretty much. The comments he made in his book set off red flags for me. He talks about goalies like some football people talk about kickers/punters.
The Artist Formerly Known as CP2Devil.
Associate Editor at Five For Howling.
by Carl Putnam on Nov 29, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
I wonder if Bruce was lost with goaltending because it is very mental. When something is off with a goalie, it’s not necessarily physical and may not be something that you can work on in practice (or with a bag skate).
If Bruce said he didn’t know how to teach toughness, I definitely don’t know how he would know how to understand goalies.
Disagree about Perrault. I think he’s going to win in the short term now that the dog-house has been blown up. I never understood why you sit MP85, especially during OT 4v4 play… Especially when he’s fresh and has been sitting half the game for no reason at all.
MP’s had a strong year from the 4th line when given the chance. Much less “one and done” like last year.
he needs to do something about getting pushed around though…every game I see him get pancaked out there almost once a shift. maybe he needs to skate lower? bulk up?
Definitely needs to bulk up. He needs to find out what St. Louis does in the offseason – MSL has ridiculous lower-body strength. Maybe if MP builds up his leg muscles like MSL did?
Failure is always an option.
Maybe he can get a talent infusion from MSL too. MP85 has zero chance to be as good as MSL in his career no matter what he does, short of Morgan Freeman giving him his power…
Occasionally reporting from Section 421 of the Verizon Center...
by MikeL-Pivonka on Nov 29, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions

by 



































