Capitals Finding a Balance
For several years now the Caps have had a roster littered with young, high-end talent upon whom the team largely depended for the overall offensive production. In the past few seasons the top trio alone has accounted for 35-40% of the overall goals, with the second line chipping in another 30-35%. And while that combination has been potent at times, it's also made the Caps' offense far too dependent on top-six production and thus more prone to being shut down by a strong defensive team. As it has been said over and over, a good team that aspires to make a long postseason run needs a balanced attack.
Last season the top trio of Alex Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom and Mike Knuble accounted for almost 34% of the team's goals and about 32% of the total points. That production combined with the array of players on the second line made up about two-thirds of the entire offense for the year - production which was reflected in the ice time (or vice versa), with the top two lines averaging between seventeen and twenty minutes a night each while the third and fourth lines saw much more limited minutes:
This wasn't exactly a new approach for the Caps, a fact which becomes very clear when looking at the numbers from the 2009-10 season:
*includes those players who spent the most time on the second line during that season:
2009-10 - Semin, Laich, Brendan Morrison, Tomas Fleischmann; 2010-11 - Semin, Laich, Johansson, Perreault, Arnott, Fleischmann
**includes the rest of the forwards
This year, however, the numbers have shifted; gone is the heavy reliance on the top line, replaced by a more balanced attack in which every line is contributing - a change that is due in no small part to the acquisitions made by GM George McPhee over the summer. Granted, none of the newest Caps would be considered offensive dynamos; their skillsets lie in the more physical, hard-working elements of the game that this team has often lacked. But they've managed to develop some chemistry with their new teammates, enabling the Caps to dress four lines that on any given night can chip in some offense.
Through seven games, here's how the scoring has been dispersed across the four forward lines and the defense:
One of the most obvious takeaways from these numbers is just how even everything from ice time to production has been so far. When Alex Ovechkin's ice time is below twenty minutes a night and Mike Green's is below twenty-five minutes, you know the team is rolling both their lines and their defensive pairs; when the second line's production is just slightly below that of the first line, the third and fourth lines just a step behind that and the defense has already combined for twenty-one points, you know it's not just the Young Guns who are scoring for the Caps.
To further underline just how balanced the attack has been, a look at how the percentages shake out (and how different they are from the past two seasons):
Of course these numbers must be taken with a grain or two of that proverbial salt.
For starters, it's only been seven games - a ludicrously small sample size. It's simply way too early for us to tell whether this is an anomaly or a true predictor of what this team will consistently be capable of doing. Secondly, there is a fair amount of luck that goes into whether Bruce Boudreau is able to roll four lines and get everyone involved - if you're not getting the bounces or if the other team jumps out to an early two- or three-goal lead, the likelihood of the fourth line getting as much ice time (or even of the lines staying together as they have so far) decreases. Dramatically.
And frankly if we're talking about Mathieu Perreault maintaining his incredibly efficient shooting percentage of 42.9% - and doing so in an even more efficient 10:42 a night - well...I'll take the under.
Still, it's an early sign that this team is capable of rolling four lines, of generating offense throughout the lineup, and of stabilizing the ice time of some of its big guns - all of which could pay dividends in the spring.
26 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I posted it this morning, but I think this quote has relevance here as well:
“I like to sneak behind their D-men like that. If you look a lot of goals I score are tap-ins behind their D-men. This is where I like to hang, and I saw the puck was there and I tapped it in.”
No, MP isn’t going to maintain a 40+% shooting rate, but if he continues to spend his time closer to the net I think he may be able to maintain a higher % than most of us would initially have expected or guessed. Closer to the net = easier to score. Who knew?
Also, I don’t have the numbers off-hand, but I seem to recall either Neil or RAL (or both) discussing the scoring rates for the top line. Didn’t AO put up relatively consistent ES scoring numbers over the last few years? Wasn’t the big drop in the PP scoring? If that’s the case, then we may be able to have a bit more confidence that AO’s scoring (and thus the top line’s scoring) is going to rebound in the ES area, which would make the whole picture even brighter.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
AO in 10-11 was ahead of his first two years (~55 ESP), a hair behind 08-09 (21 mins per ESP, 63), and behind 07-08 and 09-10 (70+ ESP, 1 every 18 and 16 mins). 24 PPP last season, 36 in 09-10, 46 in 08-09, 37 in 07-08, 37 and 52 the prior two seasons. His rates dropped more at 5on4 than at 5on5 but I think it works out both ways (and sorry, I’ve been mixing rates and absolutes in the past) to around equal contribution from ES and from PP.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 25, 2011 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
___

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Oct 26, 2011 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Your disclaimer ’graph at the end sums it up for me. Right now the save pct is way high, which is keeping games close, and the scoring is enough to get the win, particularly a couple of guys that have gotten hot at the right time.
Now, as F&B notes, there is likely to be a scoring bump from the first line. But let’s see where we are when the save percentage comes back to earth and the Caps have to play from behind a time or two. If they’re still rolling four lines and playing hard, then we’ll know BB is on to something.
The Caps piled up nice point numbers a year ago based on an unsustainable save percentage (IIRC). This team looks better than that team, but the save pct aspect remains the same. In seven games we’ve seen some desultory efforts and some good ones.
I’m in wait-and-see mode with regard to the balanced scoring, the balanced TOI and the G-A-S meter.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
Also, not for nothing, but an under-producing top line (especially at ES) will necessarily bring about more balance.
That said, I think it’s important to note that getting a goal every night as opposed to every-other-night from the bottom six forwards and the D (i.e. the 12 non-top-six forwards) is the difference between a team that averages, say, 3.09 goals per night and one that averages 2.59. Last season, that was the difference between having the fourth-best offense in hockey and the 24th-best.
Scoring depth matters (duh). Getting no goals from the 4th line or Backstrom and one each from Laich, Fehr, Sturm and Arnott in 9 playoff games last year went a long way towards sinking the ship.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Someone has to cover for Semin’s good series/bad series on/off switches. The Captain might not always pass the eye test but he puts up points in the playoffs. He needs help.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 25, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
SV% coming back down to earth will mean less games we win by 3 goal margins for sure.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 25, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Those don’t count as real wins. Whenever we are unhappy after wins they don’t count.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 25, 2011 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I think we would have missed the playoffs recently if that were the lone criterion for 2 pts.
J.P.: You might be the king of all geeks here…
by Alz Well That Ends Well on Oct 25, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
The way the press is spinning it 5 out of our 7 wins don’t count because of X, Y, and Z. Which is awesome because if those games don’t count surely I missed the memo on teams getting do overs and we all will get to see June hockey with playoff series going to 15 games each to account for all the games that don’t count
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
by breaklance on Oct 25, 2011 3:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It might be even more illustrative to look at this in terms of ES TOI. Special teams in the mix will skew to players who happen to have those skills, but ES is the more egalitarian — how you deploy and dispense time when teams are evenly matched. And the results:
1st line:
Ovechkin: 15:02
Backstrom: 14:20
Brouwer: 11:34
2nd line:
Semin: 13:59
Johansson: 11:52
Knuble: 12:47
3rd Line:
Chimera: 13:15
Laich: 13:50
Ward: 13:18
4th line:
Hendricks: 9:42
Perreault: 10:13
Halpern: 10:30
1st D Pair:
Alzner: 16:21
Carlson: 16:55
2nd D Pair:
Green: 17:27
Hamrlik: 18:18
3rd D Pair:
Schultz: 15:50
Wideman: 16:45
Things to note…
- Shouldn’t be surprising that the 3rd line gets more average ES ice time than the second line, if the Caps are matching the 3rd to the opponent’s top line regularly.
— Brouwer’s time is low compared to Ovechkin and Backstrom because he didn’t start the season on that line.
- Quite a narrow spread in time among the defensive pairs. The largest spread is 2:28 (Hamrlik and Schultz), or about a shift a period.
— And perhaps to JP’s point about the first line…Ovechkin is averaging almost two fewer minutes per game at even strength than his average last season; Backstrom almost a minute and a half.
If you've read this far...seek help.
I think Brouwer’s time is also relatively low because Bruce has been icing the Care Bears line for the first shift after PK sometimes.
by Twenty Seven Ninety on Oct 25, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Pretty much every time after a PK he comes back with the Care Bears followed by the 4th line.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 25, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
- Shouldn’t be surprising that the 3rd line gets more average ES ice time than the second line, if the Caps are matching the 3rd to the opponent’s top line regularly.
Also considering that the 2nd line as presently constituted has very little chance of winning a faceoff, so they don’t get many of them. They’re in a bit of a strategic no-man’s land in that respect – MoJo can’t win draws, so they don’t get D-zone draws, and they’re the second option for O-zone draws.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
These days, no Cap not named “Halpern” seems reliably able to win a draw.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Oct 25, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
From now on we have to use the exclamation point with his name. And only his last name.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Oct 25, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Some of the wingers have been crushing it unless I just have only caught their good games.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 25, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Related:
Standard Deviation of ES TOI/G for forwards (excluding non-qualifying players, by my standards):
2008-2009 – 2.35 minutes
2009-2010 – 2.31 minutes
2010-2011 – 2.22 minutes
2011-2012 – 1.71 minutes
by psuscott1 on Oct 25, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 10 recs
I haven’t been keeping up with comments over the last few days, so i can’t imagine i’m the first to write this — but i get the unsupported by fact sense that this is one of the longest stretches of relatively stable lines i’ve seen in a while(ever?) from BB.
I really like that the “dead-line” deals were done in the off-season this year and this group will get a chance to gel before the “real” season starts in 6 months time.
They were fairly anchored during the win streak a couple years ago as well (for what it’s worth).
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
"This [job] would be so much easier if it wasn't for the fucking [customers]."
by Bald Pollack on Oct 26, 2011 6:50 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions





































