Recap: Capitals 2, Senators 1
[GameCenter - Ice Tracker - Game Summary - Event Summary - Faceoff Summary - Play-by-Play - Home TOI - Visitor TOI - Shift Charts - Head-to-Head - Fenwick/Corsi - Zone Starts]
The Caps entered tonight with a perfect 3-0-0 record hiding some imperfect performances. Those three games came against teams that are expected to at least compete for a playoff spot. Tonight's opponent, the Ottawa Senators, has no such expectations. On paper this game should have been a formality, but as the cliche goes, that's why they play the games. One of the teams tonight got that memo. For the second straight game the Capitals showed up with a 20 minute effort and still came out with 2 points. Hey, we've all been pining for consistency right?
Ten more notes on the game:
- Amid what was largely an uninspiring game, one thing that stood out was the absence of Alex Ovechkin on the top power play unit. A goal was scored without him, and when he did return it wasn't on his familiar point position. Accountability? A new look PP? Time will tell, but we'll be watching this.
- On a night in which none of the forward lines were particularly effective, Brooks Laich's line was once again the best. If they weren't up to their normal standards, they can be forgiven. After all, thus far they've been matched against top NHL competition, and tonight they faced Jason Spezza. So when do we stop calling them the third line?
- Ottawa has a bright future on the blue line, but they aren't there yet. Possibly nobody should be more excited about the youth on the ice tonight than Team Sweden. Erik Karlsson lead the young Swedish troupe (despite being bested by his countryman, Marcus Johansson, on the game winner), but tonight (and most nights) the Caps had the better Carlson. No relation.
- Congrats to Roman Hamrlik on becoming the leading Czech-trained player in terms of NHL games played. If not being reminded of that at least once a period, I might have forgotten he was out there (and that's being generous). Still waiting for that veteran stability to show up, but it's a long season and he still has some time.
- Dennis Wideman showed why he got his healthy contract, and why he was traded twice in quick succession. His puck movement was once again present tonight, but some lazy passing led to the Senators goal late in the first period.
- Tomas Vokoun has been an elite goalie in the NHL for years playing behind inept offenses and non-contenders. So it only makes sense that the Caps would try to put him in his comfort zone, right?
- Speaking of Vokoun, after giving up 2 soft goals and gifting a point to a division rival in his first start with the Capitals, he's come up with two huge games ensuring that the Caps got 2 points in consecutive games that they probably didn't deserve to win.
- Perhaps most disappointing about the Caps' inability to take advantage of the Ottawa D corps, a D corps that has let in more goals than any other team in the league, was that the Caps were playing against only 5 defenders. And that was before Sergei Gonchar went down with an injury early in the game.
- If a sweater can be wasted on D.J. King, so can a bullet point, right?
- Let's end this on a positive note: The Caps didn't blow a third period lead for the first time all season.
It's an 82 game regular season and the Capitals had an emotional opening week, facing two division rivals and the Penguins. This game had "letdown" written all over it, and most longtime Capitals fans probably saw this coming. No team is going to put up 82 straight 60-minute efforts, so games like tonight are inevitable. Of course, that excuse observation would be a bit more comforting if any of the preceding games were 60 minute efforts. And so the Caps remain perfect in the standings, and anything but on the ice. Four games down, 78 to go, and months of anxiety and hand-wringing as Caps fans wonder when, or whether, they'll see a performance on the ice that matches the record, and the talent, on paper.
Game highlights:
207 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If a sweater can be wasted on DJ King, so can a bullet point, right?
Beautiful, though I thought King looked okay at times with the fourth line. Definitely would think MP would have had a greater impact in the lineup, however.
I was once voted the worst audience participant Cirque Du Soleil ever had.
I think King was there as an insurance policy. I agree MP85 would have had a much greater impact.
by Beakers Lab on Oct 15, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
One player wasn’t going to change the way the team played after JoJo scored.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
MP85 get’s more than the ~6.5 minutes that King got. who’s to say that 3-5 extra minutes of MP85 doesn’t equate to an extra goal or at the very least more O zone time
by Beakers Lab on Oct 15, 2011 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I think King was only in there because Zenon Konopka was on the opposing bench.
Say no to Prince Fielder in 2012.
by Knubles and Bits on Oct 16, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Tomas Vokoun has been an elite goalie in the NHL for years playing behind inept offenses and non-contenders. So it only makes sense that the Caps would try to put him in his comfort zone, right?
Brutal.
Soon the Championship with be ours, all ours!
Getting hemmed in by Pitt’s forecheck is one thing. Getting hemmed in by Ottawa’s is quite another.
Another observation on OTT’s goal: AO went for a hit in the O-zone and was late getting back into the play. It was 5-v-4 there while the scoring play was developing.
Anyway, I missed that he wasn’t on the first PP unit, so thanks for pointing that out. That’s something at least.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I’m not gonna disagree with the sentiment, but we have to be the most pessimistic group of fans in history of a 4-0 team.
ahahaha!!!
by discuit on Oct 15, 2011 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
At least he had a lead to defend this time, right?
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Don’t look now, but even with the brutal game in Tampa, Vokoun has a .922 Sv %.
I don't know, maybe it was the roses...
by Jalabar on Oct 16, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Speaking of JoJo, he seems to be building off the previous season so far with a PPG pace.
Also will be interesting to monitor Backstrom:Ovie relationship. There was some decent speculation that Ovie had such a massively down year, compared to himself, was because Nicky was too. Right now Nicky’s managing to contribute like a star player without his better half.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
To clarify, Ovi was down in part because Nicky was having one too.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
I thought Nick looked pretty good tonight, but that line still didn’t really do much at all.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Nicky is the Alzner of his line. He’s doing a great job, but it isn’t nearly as noticeable as when his partners have great games.
Its a bit of a stretch, I know, but..yeah…I’ll just go with it.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
I love Alzner. Any positive reference to him is OK in my book. I should have found a way to force him into the recap.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Alzner is freaking good, which is weird, because he’s so un-noticeable.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s the point, damn near. He’s the offensive lineman – when you notice him, it’s because he’s done something wrong. It’s what Schultz should be (speaking of… no one noticed Sarge tonight, did they? Good game.)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Oct 15, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Indeed.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Just that one time the announcers said his name tonight.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
oh and the Caps are 4-0 now with the new hat I got for this season
yeah it’s early but I’m building a season long superstition damnit! lol

by Beakers Lab on Oct 15, 2011 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Tonight’s performance by the team can be compared to Nicolas Cage’s career.
Hang in there.
"A picture is worth a thousand words. For moving pictures we manage to shorten it to one or two."
What’s more wimpy? Nic Cage’s voice or Ovie’s performance thus far.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
Is there any more details on the Matt Hendricks hit that CBC claimed was a blindside headshot? The views I saw on CSN seemed to dispute that, but in addition to some other looks, I’d like to know what other people saw/if there’s any backlash.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
Looked like shoulder to chest to me. The Senator, whoever it was (Karlsson?) def didn’t see him coming.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
Greening definitely didn’t see him coming.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Looked clean to me. The league will take a look and I assume conclude the same. All shoulder on shoulder, but it was a risky angle for Hendricks to take on the hit.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I thought it was clean, but close. In the GDT someone mentioned CBC was adamant it was a headshot.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions
It was close to a Rule 48 because it was lateral. But it was legit contact. No supplemental discipline necessary, but Hendricks might want to be a little more careful going forward.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Thanks – it seemed to get brushed under the carpet, and I wanted to make sure that wasn’t presumptive.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
CSN View on the Hendricks' hit

"A picture is worth a thousand words. For moving pictures we manage to shorten it to one or two."
by Dimagus on Oct 15, 2011 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
The person mentioned CBC showed it from another angle (I Don’t remember who it was, sorry to keep pulling that).
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah not questioning you on this. It looks very clear to me that initial contact is with the shoulder/chest area and that angle isn’t clear but I don’t see any head snap that you would typically see with a head shot
by Beakers Lab on Oct 15, 2011 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions
The “question” might be the same thing that made the Dion Phaneuf hit on Stephane da Costa. The angles of impact were different, but it its the extension of the arm after the hit that make the hit “look” questionable. I thought both were well within the limits of the rule.
If you've read this far...seek help.
Clean, though really really close. If it’s clean, it looks like Greening is trying to play it up. Thanks, Dimagus.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Great GIF, as always, Dimagus.
That’s certainly the most questionable angle. Still, pretty clear shoulder-to-not-head to me, but if the Sen had leaned in, Hendricks would be missing a couple of games or more.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I wish I could pause a gif. I think the initial contact is shoulder to chest, but it looks like there might be a frame or two where he hits chin. Oh man is that close.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Frame by frame of the hit
First contact to right before they start to separate. I can make them bigger if need be, but I didn’t want to totally bog down everyone’s browsers.





by hell0 on Oct 15, 2011 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I think it’s shoulder, but it’s close enough I could see someone raising kain. Thanks a ton, sir.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Military Sir~
Haha, caught, my fault.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Two minors, right?
Not a lot of stickwork and facewashing that I saw, though.
Pretty clean game overall. Which is weird when you have Neil playing.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I think that recap summarized my view of this game.
It looked like it was going to be an enjoyable game after 20 minutes, but then it just became really boring.
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → b a (select) start
Definitely pretty boring. Not even anger-inspiring. Just uninspiring.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
And I’ll give El Capitan some credit for creativity and changing up the release points on his solo rushes into the zone. That one rush late in the third…wow wow wow. If he had buried that…
Backstrom PPG from Semin/Knuble


"A picture is worth a thousand words. For moving pictures we manage to shorten it to one or two."
by Dimagus on Oct 15, 2011 10:51 PM EDT reply actions 8 recs
Sick play by Nick to take the puck off his skate, and obviously a great pass by Semin.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Johansson: "I got this"



"A picture is worth a thousand words. For moving pictures we manage to shorten it to one or two."
by Dimagus on Oct 15, 2011 10:51 PM EDT reply actions 8 recs
I love how all 3 Cap forwards converged on the net there. That had goal written all over it.
Cross check and all call.
by bigonetimer on Oct 15, 2011 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Gotta say, this is the sort of thing I wish we would see more of out of Ovechkin. Watching MarJo skate down the left wing and NOT try to cut inside on the defender or try any other cutesy play was immensely satisfying.
You will never see that out of Ovechkin, at least from that side of the ice. Ovechkin is a right-handed shot, he can only make that play off his backhand. He would have to start that play from the right wing.
If you've read this far...seek help.
Vokoun's late game save


"A picture is worth a thousand words. For moving pictures we manage to shorten it to one or two."
by Dimagus on Oct 15, 2011 10:52 PM EDT reply actions 6 recs
Totally an NHL 94 sprite he made in that kick save. Beauty.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Judging by the top gif, he may of only been 10-12 ft from net, ~8 from Vokes
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Brooks Laich completing everything from teams to tires and everything in between.
Who’s responsibility is it to pick up Alfie there? Laich is pretty clearly supposed to be pressuring Spezza, since he goes for him in a beeline. Which of Semin and Chimera blew that? Or was it neither?
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s a good question, and tough to answer. I don’t know BB’s scheme, so I’ll base my answer off of what defensive systems generally look like and simple logic.
In hindsight it’s easy to say Carlson should have stayed in the slot and waited for Alfie, but when Michalek was driving the slot he was the only threat there. It’s tough to ask Carlson to move off of Michalek even though Alzner was on him. If the puck goes down to the corner then Alzner is going to have to slide over and Carlson will have to cover Michalek. But as it played out there was an open shot from just inside the hash-marks, and the weak-side D generally needs to cover that area.
There’s also some responsibility on Chimera’s part. The weak side W has the responsibility to collapse down to cover the slot area in basically all NHL D-zone coverage systems. The youth-style “W covers the point man” isn’t really how it’s played anymore, and hasn’t been for at least a decade. I remember in HS my dad went to Roger Nielsen’s coaching camp and Kevin Konstantin gave a talk about how wings need to cover the slot because at the end of the day you need to prevent the more dangerous shots, and point shots are just not as threatening as a shot from the slot. So unless BB has some sort of system that bucks the trend of the last 12 years, you’d expect Chimera to be covering that slot. Watching the Caps, it’s pretty clear that BB wants his weak-side wings to cover the slot (I believe D’oh showed this in his D-zone breakdown), and watching Chimera demonstrates he thought he had that responsibility as well. Chimera was late (watch as he coasts into the screen, pretty inexcusable given his speed) and took a poor angle. The angle critique is a hindsight critique, if Alfie settled down at the top of the circle maybe Chimera’s angle would have been perfect. The coasting isn’t hindsight, though.
But in the end, you have to give Alfie a lot of credit. Great offensive players find holes in defensive zones, and despite his age and declining skills, Alfie is still an exceptionally smart player. I’d say the blame probably starts with Chimera, has a little bit of Carlson, but you have to recognize that it was a very good play by Alfie, and a great/lucky pass by Spezza. Alfie’s ability to dish the puck and then sort of float through the coverage really can’t be overstated, but it’s also fair to say that the slot should never be a soft spot in the defensive coverage.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
by Rob Parker on Oct 16, 2011 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
I’d agree with this to a degree. Where I’d disagree is in the relative weight of Carlson vs. Chimera, based in large part on how low in the zone Alfredsson was.
Basically, had Alfie been above the hash marks, I’d put the blame as 60/40 Chimera/Carlson. Since Alfie was well below the hash marks though, I’d put it closer to 70/30 Carlson. Chimera’s job in that situation as the off-side winger is to cover the high slot. He’s not responsible for the area below the dots. Sure, he could have freelanced and maybe broken up the play, but it’s not really his responsibility.
For a direct comparison, I’d use Moore’s goal in the 2nd period vs. Tampa. Ovie was in a similar position to Chimera, but Moore was at the dots/hash marks, rather than down closer to the crease. Ovie should have had him – or at least been closer.
Unleash the Apathy.
But Alfie approached from higher in the zone, skated right past Chimera, and was wide open. Chimera has to see him and mark him at that point. Carlson probably should have been higher in the slot, but as I said, he did have a legitimate concern about Michalek should Alzner have to go to the corner. The more I watch it, the less I like Chimera’s play. He’s chasing to the far side of the ice, coasts past and open forward, and generally shows poor awareness.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
just got in from the game and I was appalled by the whiffs, the bad passes, the falling down, goalie leaving an open net and other three stooges type goofs that typified the Caps play after the first 17 min.
Another ulcer for me.
"One of the most difficult things everyone has to learn is that for your entire life you must keep fighting and adjusting if you hope to survive." -George Allen
@SWhyno
Question for #Caps fans: Writing story on Sergei Gonchar. Guy played 10 years here – how much do you still care about him?
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
He was a big deal when I was growing up – I liked him a lot. I hope he’s successful. I certainly hope he’s ok – from the sounds of things, he was hurt something awful.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions
well crap, I didn’t realize he was badly hurt. Obviously I don’t wish harm on anyone. Once Gonchar left the Caps I just blocked him out.
by Beakers Lab on Oct 15, 2011 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions
so says the radio
Supposedly it was only a bruise
"One of the most difficult things everyone has to learn is that for your entire life you must keep fighting and adjusting if you hope to survive." -George Allen
Great to hear.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 15, 2011 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s funny, Gonchar was my favorite when he was here (wore his jersey) but I have zero connection to him now. It’s not like Jagr, who I loathe, I just feel nothing for Gonch. I guess that’s a combination of the good times, the Pens times, and that the Caps have become a lot better so there’s no reason to be wistful.
Oh, and the Caps got a few years of ShaMo and the Schultz pick for him in a salary dump, so that was a pretty good return.
I remember him claiming he wanted to go to a contender, and a couple of months later, he signed with league-worst Pittsburgh (who were in the lotto his first season there too, IIRC). I dislike him for that.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions
That is also my opinion of Brendan Witt, of all people. Raised a stink about wanting to be with a contender and voluntarily ended his career with a few seasons on Long Island.
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → b a (select) start
Didn’t the Islanders actually make the playoffs once or twice while Witt was there?
by Murshawursha on Oct 16, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Are those Corsi/Fenwick numbers right? If so reads like top line had the bulk of our good possession. They were on ice for the goal against, but generated a bunch of chances as well. Also, Ovie was on the top power play unit just not on the point. The PP we scored on top line was out for extended shift with Vokoun pulled on the delayed call. I do like D pairings of 52/6 and 44/74 because it keeps Ovie off the point.
Wideman definitely had an off night. He was so flat footed in our zone and that partially led to their one goal with the turnover.
Vokoun gets a little scrambly at times but anytime he’s squared up or reading the play well he is lights out.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 15, 2011 11:31 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Yes, I thought it was interesting that the D pairings were changed. I look forward to seeing what 52/6 and 44/74 can produce. Greenie and Hamr weren’t often on the same page. It’s also good for Carly and Alzner to spend time with other d-men.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
I was only talking about PP pairings on the point. D pairings were the same at 5on5.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 15, 2011 11:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I guess the Corsi looks good, but Chicago would’ve hung a +30 or more on Ottawa. I’m not all that impressed. I expect good nights from the top line, and I feel like I should be, too.
Laich was +4 in faceoff differential….yay for D zone starts?
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Or Chicago could have had a lackluster game and not done that. As much as I do think there are a lot of areas we can improve upon…the acting like any real contender would have out shot every team we play against by 20+ and won every game 5-1 just isn’t true. Even good teams don’t do that all the time. They just look really good when they do it, and they usually have had postseason success or at least not as much perceived failure as we have.
Yes, I had to bold that. If we had made it a round or two further in the playoffs last year, I bet the negativity over how we’ve gone 4-0 to start to season would be about 1/10th what it is now.
And regardless if Chicago or any other contender would have hung up +30, I’m looking at the fact that Backstrom and Ovechkin had the best combined Corsi/Fenwick on the team and comparing it to the rest of the team. I thought the 3rd line and Alzner/Carlson looked okay tonight, and yet they all had subpar numbers in Corsi and Fenwick.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly, it wouldn’t have even taken a round or two further to assuage my negativity… Making the TBL series competitive might have been enough. However, we were outplayed in just about every aspect of every game of that series .
by Murshawursha on Oct 16, 2011 2:06 AM EDT up reply actions
No, it wouldn’t happen every time. But there’s a most frequent or expected result, isn’t there? Basically, an average performance. Unless I’m vastly underestimating Ottawa, an average performance from a really good hockey team would be a solid win and domination for extended stretches of play.
You’re banking on this being an outlier in a bad sense. I hope you’re right. I think you’re right. I was just commenting that +10 or so against a bad team isn’t actually all that good. It’s not terrible, but not great.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
We were out shot by 8, so I feel like the top line’s numbers look pretty good. On the whole yeah, it looks bad. It’s a little weird because I didn’t think the 3rd line looked bad in possession, but the numbers make it look like them and Carlznerson got crushed.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 17, 2011 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
BB was actually starting them in the defensive zone quite a bit and they logged plenty of ice against the Alfredsson line. I’d have liked to see a bit better, but I’m not worried about them.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 17, 2011 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow. Can’t agree with the tone of this summary at all. Makes the game sound far worse than it was.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
I think I’m a pretty optimistic poster here, but I got pretty frustrated since the Capitals couldn’t “put them away.” Ottawa is a very popular pick to finish last in the East, the Caps should have whipped them (then again, Vancouver barely beat Edmonton). After the first two goals, it looked like that would happen.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions
@kcarrera
Saw Michal Neuvirth walking in Verizon Center. He was limping quite a bit, not putting much weight on his right foot. #Caps
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
Two observations from my seat, which may be out of line. One was that I could have sworn the zebras missed multiple offside calls against the Sens. I definitely saw white ice at times when the puck crossed the line and was sent back in.
Second observation was that Vokoun is a bit of an adventure out there when he goes to play the puck. Nearly lost it a couple of times. Still, he saved the team’s bacon once again.
Don’t try to figure Sasha out. Just ride the wave.
When I looked for the game details via the NHL.com website, I saw a Brooks Laich player website. Maybe it’s old news, but color me surprised.
Quand on change d'attitude ça change tout
Since many don’t venture into the GDTs, I’m reposting a couple of my comments from the 3rd period thread which were in response to a couple of Steck It Out comment, but also in response to the general tone of a lot of post game comments:
There is no pleasing some people. It was a better game than what we’ve seen this season. The Caps scored the first two goals. There were longer stretches of energy. The Captain had energy. They held the lead the entire game. They won in regulation.
I know what you meant. It’s one of the things I am (and others) are tired of. Good things happened in this game yet as soon as the game ended most of the posts were blah. Anyone would think the team didn’t win.
After the PIT game people were saying they were tired of OT wins. They wanted a regulation win. Well, they got one and aren’t happy about it.
Well, blah and meh to all of you.
Downers. Downers. Downers. The Caps WON. In REGULATION. And HELD THE LEAD.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
I don’t think anyone is upset at the result. I think a large amount of us are just upset at the overall efforts.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 16, 2011 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks in large part to Vokoun coming up big.
What everybody wants to see is a consistent 60-minute effort. That still wasn’t here, and until it happens on a regular basis, the doubts aren’t going anywhere.
by Murshawursha on Oct 16, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess one thing we can be happy about is that GMGM has built a team that, regardless of what’s going on, has a chance to win every night even if the vast majority of the team doesn’t show up. Whether that’s Ovechkin or lucking into Vokoun, who knows?
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Oct 16, 2011 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Vokoun was awesome tonight, no doubt.
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
Vokoun is definitely getting his rhythm going and finding his comfort zone. He is aggressive and sometimes looks scrambly because of it, but he made some lovely saves. Especially the one near the end.
Energy-wise the game had a fair amount of meh to it.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions
The “60 minute effort” is a little more elusive to quantify than a lot of people think though. Whether we’re playing Pittsburgh, Detroit, or even Ottawa, opposing teams will have pushback at times and look like the better team for portions of the game. I dislike how we’re on our heels as much as we are, but to think we’re just going to roll a team for all 60 minutes is completely unrealistic, and I feel like there are times when effort is given, results just don’t show up every time.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions
That’s fair, but two periods being out-shot by OTT and two periods of 3 shots for against PIT don’t fit that model of “the game has ebbs and flows.” Not in my opinion. There should never be a period where this OTT team can triple the shots of this WAS team.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Which is why I was speaking in a more general sense v. specifically these last 2 games. I’ve seen the “60 minute effort” phrase get tossed around for a lot more than just games like these last 2.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Even the ‘10 CHI team that dominated the shot-clock had the Hawks’ bloggers bemoaning the lack of 60 minute efforts from the team. I imagine the dominant Wings teams from 05-09 were the same.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Right, and I think if you are wise you should make a distinction between “dominating the game from start to finish” and “team seemed to coast for periods at a time.” The latter is what concerns me.
I’m sure CHI had off games, and probably even DET. But at least with DET I highly doubt they would just go through the motions for 30+ minutes all too often.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Without following those teams closely, it’s hard for me to tell. Probably not though – you don’t run up those shot differentials if you take long chunks of the game off. One of those Wings teams outshot opponents by some silly margin, I can’t recall exactly what it was, but it was enormous.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Oct 16, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s pretty good, I guess.
I have planned my grand attacks; I will stand behind their backs. With my brand new battle-axe, they will taste my wrath. They will hear me say as the pavement whirls, "I hate California girls."
by Steckel Me Elmo on Oct 16, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
And it was ~9.5 the next year. Yeesh.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Right, there is a large difference between the two, and you just aren’t going to see it on most nights where one team completely dominates a game start to finish. There are times in the last 2 games when we have a lead that I don’t even feel like it’s lack of effort, but almost by design to try to absorb pressure…and I don’t like it. It’s one thing to trap, it’s another to just try to hold on for dear life.
I’m just not as worried with 78 games left to work on stuff as I would be if we only had 20 games left.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course it’s better to have 78 games, and I think in both of my recaps I’ve acknowledged that it’s early, that the Caps haven’t lost their season, and that it’s just something to watch as the season progresses. I haven’t called them dead, I’ve just pointed out the things that I’m specifically looking for during the regular season.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Yeah I’m not talking about you, you’re pointing out the troubles we’re seeing but also pointing out the obvious (or what should be obvious) that we’re not even 5 games into the season yet. We’re working in a lot of new guys, and predictably they’ve had their bright spots and their lower points (besides maybe Ward, who’s been pretty steady doing what he does).
I’ve seen small things that are different from last year or the last few years. I’d like to see even more from our top line, but they are slowing flashes of doing what they do. Vokoun has been as advertised in the last couple games though…and that will help us going forward. Only concern I have is leaning too much on Vokoun to either bail us out, or (more worrisome in my opinion) playing him too many minutes early in the season. A guy at his age, he hasn’t had many seasons where he’s had to play beyond April 10th. Given our ultimate goal, even if I expect and hope he’s the number 1, I would really like Neuvy to see plenty of starts to not overwork TV. Neuvy needs to heal up sooner rather than later.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree that we should definitely manage Vokoun’s workload.
I agree that Ward has been really good.
Obviously I agree that we need more from the top line. For 20 minutes and maybe 2 shifts in the third last night AO started to show it. Nick looks like he’s going to have a bounce back year. But when those guys aren’t producing, it’s not enough.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Agreed. Although Nicky’s stats aren’t too shabby through 4 games…1+4. Still they could be better, and AO definitely could be. Although he was looking very dangerous at times and I still feel like Nicky finding the net more would help because he has set him up quite a few times already.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 17, 2011 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions
So you want to look enjoy the forest and take umbrage with folks who want to examine the trees, do I have it right?
Look, not only is it an inclination, it’s looking, hoping for gradual, incremental improvement and not being let down by a team that in the past has shown a similar behavior and/or mindframe in circumstances much greater than the fourth game of the regular season. If that makes me one of the “downers,” then whatevs I guess.
And blah and meh to you too.
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
"This [job] would be so much easier if it wasn't for the fucking [customers]."
by Bald Pollack on Oct 16, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions
NO. I, and others, have been asking for some of the balance to come back to the discussions on this board.. People have gotten so bogged down in what is wrong that it colors almost everything.
Is that an unreasonable request?
If b.orr is any indication, people are not getting some of the satisfaction they used to get out of this board. People are starting to avoid joining in discussions or threads they once took part in with regularity.
I’m not a Pollyanna. Far from it. I’ve taken part in many discussions about the problems we see with this team, but my goodness, more and more it seems like people can’t step back and enjoy much any more.
My goodness, maybe I should take a hiatus too. The knowledge is still here, but the satisfaction I found here is fading.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Go read the post-gamers from Peerless, Ed and RMNB. Doesn’t the general link in all of them seem to be the same thing? Are they downers?
If you want to disagree fine, the beauty is that there are disagreements and anyone can debate them all the live long day. We’ve had them before and continue having them in the future. You can enjoy the win, others won’t.
Anyone’s lauding (or bemoaning) a regulation win isn’t going to sway whatever thoughts I hold on it at all.
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
"This [job] would be so much easier if it wasn't for the fucking [customers]."
by Bald Pollack on Oct 16, 2011 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s because the “tone” of how we should be winning has become pervasive throughout Caps blogsphere and Twitter after the past 2 years. We’re held to that standard now because we’ve had a lack of postseason success.
The first couple years we were the new kids in the playoffs that pushed Philly to 7 games, and the team that pushed the eventual Cup champs to 7 games in a classic series. The last 2 years have really changed the entire tone about how the team is covered and talked about.
It’s both understandable and a litter counterintuitive to hear that nothing we do in the regular season is really going to matter…oh except if we are losing or not winning the right way. Then it matters. Only it doesn’t…it just plays on people’s fears that the flaws of this team, both perceived and real, are both what has caused us to fall short in the playoffs the past few years (not the sole reason, but the main one) and what will cause us to fall short again this year and in the future until we fix these flaws.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 5:05 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
The Caps look more physical. The D look more determined to do something with the puck — fewr chip shots off the boards, more attempts to dump pucks at/near the net. AO has a tip-in goal and a blocked shot in the crease. Backstrom’s touch is somewhere nearby, if not flat-out returned. Chimera has three goals. The care bears have missed a shift.
Based on 1/20th of a season, it’s at least as reasonable to conclude something Is Changing as to assert Nothing Has Changed.
....when the truth is if they knew anything about the game, they'd be in it.
--GMGM
There are no perfect teams… None. All teams have flaws. Say what you want, but THIS team has tied the franchise record for best start to a season, and can eclipse that mark with a win against Florida.
Every line but the top line is different from last year. Every defensive pairing is different from last year. Most of the lines are different from those used in the pre-season. Anyone that thinks it doesn’t take time for a team with so many key new faces and new combos to gel hasn’t been paying attention.
And yeah… until some can celebrate wins, I think I’ll take a break from here too.
I don't know, maybe it was the roses...
Nobody is telling you, or anyone, not to celebrate. If a 2-1 victory against a doormat is what floats your boat, then fine, celebrate away. Other people feel differently. You all complain about “bringing balance” to the discussion, then fucking bring. Tell us why you are happy or optimistic. That’s bringing balance. Don’t tell us to hide what we think, falsely modify our opinions, or pretend that we aren’t seeing troubling signs. Sometimes I’d like the weatherman to “bring more balance” but when the weather’s shitty, it’s shitty. Tell me where the sun is and let’s have a discussion instead of everyone complaining about the lack of balance.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
by Rob Parker on Oct 16, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly F&B posters including myself were laying low amongst all the negativity until b.orr4 posted his “need to take a break” piece. It was like he had opened a window for air. Now many are saying their bit, asking for more balance in the analysis. That’s all.
Yes, there are some disturbing patterns present. But there are also positives. I am not ready to fast forward to the playoffs right now and predict failure.
But some of the posters asking for less doom and gloom are getting slammed for it. Not once have I read that people want to be wearing rose-colored glasses and spoon-fed pablum. But taking a little pleasure along with the pain of following the Caps along the season is not a bad thing.
Personally I enjoyed your write-up. Spot-on. But then I like dark snarky humor.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Well I don’t think I ever said that this team is doomed for playoff failure. Others have said that if this play keeps up, there will be failure, and I think that’s accurate. But I’ve also made sure to note that there is time left to work out the kinks.
Also, the people saying they want more balance are being a little too selective, IMO. Laich’s line has been praised in just about every recap. Vokoun has been praised with the exception of the soft goals against TBL; he even got credit for the third period and OT of that game. Hamrlik hasn’t been good, but he hasn’t gotten slammed either. Nobody called it a failed signing or said he’d never work out. We’ve been patient and just pointed out that he hasn’t lived up to hopes yet. Wideman has largely been praised for his work moving the puck and on the PP. I think that credit has been given where it’s due. There just hasn’t been a ton of credit due on an individual or even team level thus far.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
by Rob Parker on Oct 16, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
For the record, I wasn’t thinking of you in particular. Your analysis has been pretty, well, what I said: “spot on.” Besides I like my pain meds wrapped in the funny.
I was responding more generally to the ongoing conversation over the past few days. Posters seem to be split into two camps: those who want to talk about the flaws and continuing patterns and those who want to talk also of the good things and enjoy the differences in the team and the new season.
The two camps appear to have squared off and are now defensive and reactionary.
This thread seemed like a good example of that. Just because someone asks for a lighter tone it doesn’t mean that they don’t want the harder analysis. Just like the other posters discussing the larger disturbing trends and what they may portend for the team’s future success were most definitely not panicking.
There is valuable middle ground here in which both sides can meet in peace.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
We have tried to bring balance and we have pointed out the positives. I feel we are being shot down or dismissed. This post for example.
Voices are being drowned out. Some of us aren’t going quietly others already have. It doesn’t bode well for the variety of persectives that is supposedly valued here.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Who was shouted down? I don’t see any shouting. And aside from the “we’re 4-0-0” I don’t see a whole lot of examples of positives that aren’t already being acknowledged. Again, do you have any specific examples of players you feel I’ve slighted?
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I didn’t say shout. I said “shot” and “drowned.”
It is cumulative, F&B, your re-cap was just one straw on the camel’s back. It’s a pervasiveness over at least the past year and a half.
Re-cap specific, I think my last straw was the D.J. King bullet point. Yeah, he doesn’t have much skill and what he has is declining and of little use to this team, but his game last night wasn’t bad. It didn’t cost the Caps. There was no pointless fight interrupting the game. He didn’t deserve to be a snark target last night.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Ah, my mistake, I misread “shot.”
I guess I think it’s funny that the King bullet was what upset you. No, he wasn’t bad, and I agree that he didn’t really hurt the team. It really came down to this game giving me not very much to write about and I needed one more bullet. Instead of sitting on my couch and trying to think of something interesting (which I had been doing for most of the second half of the game) I just mailed in one bullet point and dressed it up in some snark. Don’t take it too seriously.
Sorry, D.J. Please don’t beat me up.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I had no real issue on the King bullet. There was a play or two when I thought he did the bare minimum what we would hope from him, but just giving that much credit to so simple a thing made me realize how much we could use another player in that spot.
Maybe he was a deterrent just being in the lineup.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Right, you have to consider that Konopka and Neil weren’t running around like complete jerks because King was wearing a jersey. It’s hard to prove one way or another, but I think you have to consider that possibility.
I just don’t think he’s a particularly good hockey player and I’ve argued against the efficacy of having the enforcer roster spot for a while now.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I would go so far as to say that DJ King has been a particularly bad hockey player. From a pure hockey perspective (ignoring the crowd and entertainment aspect), the presence of enforcers strikes me as a classic prisoner’s dilemma if guys like Neil goon it up.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed on all points.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on Oct 16, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Telling me to go read the post-gamers from Peerless et al. means you have completely overlooked my main point. I have been pointing out the tonal changes on this board for a while now. My frustration didn’t start with F&B re-cap.
The pattern started as far back at last year’s December losing streak and probably farther back than that. I have mentioned it. Others have mentioned it. The playoff losses haven’t been fun and the losing streak was bleak. People here want to see better out of the Caps and think they’ve lost their identity, are gun shy, haven’t recovered their confidence. Well I’m holding the mirror up to this board and its posters.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Holding the mirror up in what sense? We’ve lost our identity? I’m not sure what you’re getting at.
Peerless and Ed F. had very similar takes on the game. It’s not just here that Caps fans are concerned about pervasive patterns in the team’s play. And as I said above, there has been credit given where due, especially Laich’s line. What suggestions would you have? What bullets would have gone into the oldemystix recap that would have made this a more positive take on the game? Vokoun was good and he got credit, Laich’s line was mostly good and they mostly got credit. Who did I slight? What critiques are inaccurate in your opinion?
Obviously, this is all speculation.
Complex to explain, but in simple terms, but like the Caps, consciously or unconsciously stuck on the losses, the failures, December, dashed expectations. Not recovering. Expecting and waiting for all to go wrong again; protecting youself by downplaying the positive.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Well I don’t think the December streak really is what is influencing anyone. Even during the streak the negative Nancies acknowledged that they were getting bad luck and they really weren’t that bad (just like they weren’t that good during the 14 game win streak). Really what concerns people is the years of playoff failures, and seeing the same signs of that kind of play.
And I’m not sure how you can fault a Caps fan for waiting for it to all go wrong. It’s been happening since the ’80s.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
That’s the funny thing about the mind, individual or collective, it isn’t always apparent what baggage is being carried around or how or when it influences.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
So what’s the upshoot here? Are you proffering a diagnosis?
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Oct 16, 2011 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
So are you accusing me of sub-consciously carrying baggage from that losing streak? I can tell you 100% I don’t give a crap about the losing streak (or maybe I just think I don’t).
I could start pop-psyching you and accusing you of some unconscious stuff, but I’d rather have a conscious discussion, which is why I’ve point blank asked you (open question to everyone) what critiques you have about my recap. I’m a big boy, I can take it.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
I haven’t read the rest of this thread yet, but had to respond. The negativity started right at the beginning of last season. They had to stop winning by playing the wrong way. And I bought into it. And was miserable.
Apparently the players and the coach also bought into it, which made the losing streak all that more difficult. And that is why in my first post I brought up the BB’s nugget about how hard the players were on themselves last season for every sloppy shift and every game they won but shouldn’t have in October and November a year ago. Say what you will about BB, but he has good intuition and I think he is right. Emotion and confidence play a huge role in success.
For example, what I recall from a year ago is a whole lot of complaints about how Ovi didn’t seem like himself. We wanted happy svelte Ovi back. We want him to weave his way down the ice looking menacing, but damn he has to stop thinking he has to carry the team on his back and do it all himself. He needs to use his teammates. They have to stop depending on him. And on and on and on.
I made a personal decision this year to enjoy the Caps, game from game. To enjoy the season. Dissect the games individually, note the failures and the improvements. And most importantly to take pleasure in the high moments but not feel guilty because they might have won it wrong way.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know where the negativity started with me. It was when Boudreau was so badly outcoached in the Montreal series that a President’s Trophy winner was dumped out by an 8 seed. Then we didn’t fire Boudreau. Then the next year he was so badly outcoached by a rookie coach that the top seed in the East was swept out of the playoffs. Then we didn’t fire Boudreau.
I know it’ll happen again this year but dang if I don’t love our players, Semin included. So I just watch the games to be amazed by the ridiculously beautiful things they do with the puck with absolutely zero expectations that they’ll win even a single series in the spring. So if we’re not winning in the spring, we might as well enjoy these regular season wins, right?
It’s actually kind of a fun approach.
"If I knew then what I know now, that woulda messed it up somehow" - Roy Drusky
I’m on board with you about BB getting out coached in two series, although I believe the injuries in the TB series played a large role in the sweep.
And during the season I have my face-palm moments. I was so annoyed at the Caps’ Keystone Cops routine at the end of the first period in the Sens game. But dang I loved watching Mackan swoop around the net, holding off the Sens’ player, and stuff that puck in.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 17, 2011 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I haven’t been in any of the discussions for months, but have had the exact same frustration with the team that F&B captures so well. Actually thought this recap was fairly soft/tongue-in-cheek given how disorganized and unsharp they were in that second half of a one-goal game.
Anyhow, sorry you’re not enjoying the threads as you once did, and I haven’t seen what’s roiling in the GDTs, but I sure don’t see anything that’s irrational or sky-is-falling in this thread.
"This guy is an android. He's not human....Oh my goodness."
by Sam DC on Oct 16, 2011 7:00 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Thanks Sam, I also thought my recap was mostly tongue-in-cheek, but you can never tell how tone will be interpreted on the internet. I’m sure at some point I’ll end up writing a scathing recap, but this wasn’t it.
Obviously, this is all speculation.
If you want all negativity, go over to Caps Insider. I have found most of the entries on here to be constructive criticism and usually in a tongue in cheek way like this recap. I also like the links so much on here. Thanks to all.
by CTCapsFan on Oct 16, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Welcome aboard.
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
"This [job] would be so much easier if it wasn't for the fucking [customers]."
by Bald Pollack on Oct 16, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
The negativity on CI is so over the top it is easy to shrug off or laugh at like the most histrionic soap opera.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
I think that’s why I occasionally dip my toe in. It’s gotten to the point of satire on occasion.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
One more thing. You can really be a jerk sometimes, BP. You really can.
I rather enjoyed this game. It wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t terrible. Then people started posting as if they had watched a completely different game. And my joy started to fade. It was a win. A regulation win. And now I feel bad about it and now I’m sitting here crying about it.
It was a goddamn win.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
That’s a personal attack and is wholly unacceptable. If you’ve got an issue with a member of our team, shoot him an email – they’re all right there next to their names on the masthead.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Oct 16, 2011 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Though I missed tonight's game,
I recommend Ides of March…
by Dammit Cerrato... on Oct 16, 2011 12:17 AM EDT reply actions
Does anyone happen to remember what song won the poll they do in the arena? I submitted one so I want to know if it won :p
I'm on the twitters! Currently Watching: Breaking Bad season 2
"Common sense is not so common."
Boooo! Ha. Thanks!
I'm on the twitters! Currently Watching: Breaking Bad season 2
"Common sense is not so common."
Yeah… wasn’t really expecting to find any fellow insomniacs here this late :-p
by Murshawursha on Oct 16, 2011 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Really surprised at how many people who are on. I just got back from Hershey.
I'm on the twitters! Currently Watching: Breaking Bad season 2
"Common sense is not so common."
Re:Cap Recap
Terrific BPs and GIFs.
Next week: Philly and the Wings. Should provide a measure of their worth.
Rooting for the Caps from the OBX.
by Acer Jonesy's Laughker on Oct 16, 2011 6:01 AM EDT reply actions
Hamrlik. My guess is it’s probably more about the “most games played by a Czech-born/trained player” than his play last night – a lifetime achievement hard hat, if you will.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I agree that there is a fair amount to be concerned about in terms of effort, but the optimist in me speculates that:
1 – Green & Hamrlik are still figuring out each other as a d-pairing and will get better.
2 – The Caps are trying to find their PP offense still, and look clunky because of it, but as they did with their PK last year, it will get better.
3 – MJ90 got owned by Regin in the dot, and he won’t be elite in that skill this year, but otherwise he was 5-for-7 on faceoffs, and will get better.
4 – The team is 4-0-0 (!), and I have faith it will get better.
Keep up the Positive Mental Attitude, friends.
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
The power play is going to be an interesting thing to see evolve. They have been mixing things up, trying to install a 1-3-1 formation with three Caps across the middle across the hash marks that they use from time to time. They were working on this to some extent in training camp. It is a work in progress.
If you've read this far...seek help.
Thanks for this nugget. I was trying to figure out why it looked different.
by capsyoungguns on Oct 16, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Lat night’s power play goal was so deja vu: a quick cross-ice pass between Nicky and Sasha down low on opposite sides of the goal. Use to see that so often in 09-10.
"You can want to get to April but when you get to April you may not like the answers you get, so you might as well enjoy the ride while it's going on." - Brian McNally on JRR, 8/29/2011

by 




































