2009-10 Rink Wrap: Tyler Sloan
From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up,Tyler Sloan.
Key Stat: Sloan's ice time varied across the board, with half of his forty games clocking in at over fifteen minutes and ten games under ten minutes. He crossed the twenty minute plateau only three times during the season.
Interesting Stat: Half of Sloan's points came in the first eight games he played; two of the last three came in his last six games of the season.
The Good: The job requirements for a third-pairing defenseman who dresses for less than half the regular season aren’t too complicated: keep the puck out of your own net, fill in where you can and don’t get hurt. And while Sloan’s role gradually diminished as the season went on, he did manage to chip in where he could and remained a decent depth player when called upon.
Sloan continued his role as "swingman" this season, playing as both a defenseman and a forward when needed. He set a new career high in points with six, and scored goals in back-to-back games for the first time in early November. His 52 blocked shots were the 8th highest on the team, and he ranked 11th on the team with 56 hits despite playing in less than half the games of most of the guys ahead of him. His 1.40 hits per game and 1.30 blocked shots per game were both 7th best among anyone playing at least 40 games.
He also was something of a road warrior, with five of his six points coming away from Verizon Center and a +6 rating on the road.
The Bad: Unfortunately for Sloan – and the Caps – his days of being an adequate fill-in at the NHL level seem to be diminishing; Sloan appeared in just 40 of the 82 regular season games and just eleven in the last three months of the season. While his road numbers were decent, his numbers at Verizon were abysmal, with just one assist and a team-worst -7 in the friendly confines of the Phone Booth.
Averaging just over a minute on the penalty kill, he had the fifth worst shorthanded GAON/60 on the team (third worst among players appearing in at least 40 games). He also had the fourth highest GA/ON60 at even strength among players appearing in at least 40 games.
Beyond that was just the simple decline of someone whose abilities seemed limited compared to those coming up behind him. While his goals per game production experienced a slight increase (thanks to his goal output doubling from one to two), his assists per game, points per game and plus/minus per game all dropped. Despite playing in just forty games he was on the ice for twenty-eight goals against, twenty-one of them at even strength.
The Vote: Rate Sloan below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
The Discussion: With John Carlson and Karl Alzner poised to make the leap to the NHL next year, are Tyler Sloan's days as the seventh/eighth defenseman coming to an end? Does his versatility and ability to jump into a forward role when needed make him more valuable than John Erskine or can/should he be moved? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
107 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He won’t get a fair vote, I’m not going to fight it.
Twitter!!!1
Reppin' Team Tyler yo.
by Ovechwin on Jun 7, 2010 12:02 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You don’t have to fight it, but explain what you think he should get and why and maybe you’ll sway people.
by Becca H on Jun 7, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 9 recs
I had already put it in the clips
You can’t have expected much from him and he didn’t do too shitty of a job so if you give him less than 5 you obviously had unrealistic expectations or are a jerk not going by the intended criteria. I gave him a 7 because I didn’t expect him to stick the whole year and he didn’t shit the bed. He filled in where he was needed and did an admiral job.
Twitter!!!1
Reppin' Team Tyler yo.
Honestly I was torn between a 4 and a 5; ultimately went with a 4, because I view a 5 as ‘exactly met expectations’ and frankly I expected a bit more from him. Had I expected a LOT more I would have given him lower than a 4.
As it is I merely expected him to be a legit 6th/7th D-Man for the whole season and I just don’t think he was. The fact that he dressed for 40 games out of 82 games (and just 2 playoff games) tells me that the team somewhat agrees, or started to by the end of the season. The numbers are…rough. And I was rarely comfortable watching him, something I don’t remember dealing with last year.
He was in the minors for a heck of a long time before coming to the NHL, feasibly he shouldn’t be expected to be more than a 7.
Twitter!!!1
Reppin' Team Tyler yo.
Right, but you never really know – and based on what I saw last year I simply expected a bit more out of him.
Not saying he had to be a 20 minute a night guy or play perfect defense (god knows that’s not a prerequisite for being on our team). Not even saying that there wasn’t some good in his performance this season. But based on my personal expectations for him, from what I saw last season, he fell just short – and that’s why I had to give him a 4.
same stuff, different day…
“Anyone who doesn’t like Sloan is a jerk”
Anyone who makes the cut and stays with the squad the entire year should play like an NHL dman and he plain didn’t.
proud 4th line advocate
ECS Member
same stuff, different day…
"Anyone who doesn’t like Sloan is a jerk"
Interesting, thats a far cry from what was actually said:
or are a jerk not going by the intended criteria.
Anyway, whatever your opinion on Sloan’s campaign, I think some may have (presuming that you’re voting per the criteria) had too high expectations. Did you honestly think he was a legitimate NHL player? I wouldn’t have. He’s a good to above average AHL player, regardless of GMGM extending him or a hot spurt.
On the Forecheck: preaching the Predators' gospel to the unwashed masses.
Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
ack, vote fail: meant to hit ‘5’.
On the Forecheck: preaching the Predators' gospel to the unwashed masses.
Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
Considering that most people voted 4s and 5s I’d say a lot of our expectations were pretty spot on, if a little over-reaching. I’m not sure how much you followed the Caps last year but he was kind of a bright spot for us, and people were pleasantly surprised at what he accomplished. Not thrilled at the extension, mind you, but pleasantly surprised by him.
And the notion that someone isn’t a legit NHL player just because they’ve spent a lot of time in the AHL is, in my opinion at least, a bit flawed. A lot of players take longer to develop and we’ve seen them throughout our team’s history – and hell, look at our coach!
I think between the performance last year and the extension and the fact that he made the team out of camp, we had every right to assume he would be a serviceable D for the whole season. For my money, he fell just short of that.
You can’t have expected much from him and he didn’t do too shitty of a job so if you give him less than 5 you obviously had unrealistic expectations or are a jerk not going by the intended criteria.
Needless to say, I disagree. 5 = meeting expectations. He didn’t, on the whole, meet the expectations that he himself created by playing pretty well at the end of last season and the expectations created when GMGM signed him to an extension. He went from serviceable fill-in to pretty undesirable fill-in, hence the 4.
My expectations? Reasonable. My vote? According to the intended criteria. That vote? 4.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Jun 7, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’d like to point out that people vote then read most of the time.
Twitter!!!1
Reppin' Team Tyler yo.
You mean if people aren’t impressed with Sloan to begin with, then if they end the season unimpressed with him then he gets at least a 5 for meeting that expectation?
I guess another way of putting it would be:
Rate Sloan below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season
by Icebat on Jun 7, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice way to open the thread, trying to out-martyr the Semin Lobby and all.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Jun 7, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 8 recs
it’s one thing to say that sloan received more playing time than expected, and therefore exceeded expectations. but it’s another thing to say that sloan received more playing time than expected, and therefore outperformed expectations. lacing up skates and playing exactly as i’d have expected = performing to my expectations. especially since he lost out to carlznerson in the end.
i couldn’t give him more than a 5 and considered giving him a 4, since i would’ve liked to see him rise to the occassion with the opportunities he was handed. going into the season, i wasn’t sure about how i valued sloan. i wasn’t sure whether he deserved PT over erskine or alzner, but i wasn’t adamant about sloan being denied the chance. now i very much hope that sloan has a permanent spot in the rafters, since a jersey for sloan means either (1) injuries have left the caps in emergency mode or (2) BB is nuttier than i realized.
I’m incredibly reasonable with my Sloan love. I’m not sure he’ll be with the caps next year, and if he is, it’ll be a press box seat most of the year. I definitely believe that he should get playing time over Erskine, and he’s cheaper to boot.
Twitter!!!1
Reppin' Team Tyler yo.
4. Slightly less productive than I expected. I’d have given him a 5 if he was more consistent either way. One thing I wanted to see was some consistency even if it was he was overmatched every shift.
GMGM gets a -1 for signing him to a one way multi-year deal.
"You ever use smelling salts, every time you type a bad blog?" Brooks Laich
I honestly can't remember what my expectations were exactly
which means they weren’t too high. 6.
With John Carlson and Karl Alzner poised to make the leap to the NHL next year, are Tyler Sloan’s days as the seventh/eighth defenseman coming to an end?
Yes, but they’re not over yet. He’s still 7/8 until there’s another NHL-level D under contract.
Does his versatility and ability to jump into a forward role when needed make him more valuable than John Erskine or can/should he be moved?
I don’t think so. There’s already lots of forward depth. Center Sloan can’t fill in at, on wing move a guy up a line and call up A Gordon or Beagle or MP or Bouchard or someone from Hershey, I think.
What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
Be the 3rd pairing D and get PP time, with an average (on the Caps) plus minus and GF and GAON/60 ratings. Maybe 5 goals, 20 points, jump into the rush and score a la his Dallas goal.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
Ima deducting one point for the goal he gifted to Crosby in Snovechkin.
http://capitals.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?hlg=20092010,2,870&event=WSH33&fr=false
we all know it should just be a 1/3-Richard. stupid disallowed Hal Gill goal….
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
See, half wins exist!!!!!!!
Honestly though, I didn’t expect better from Sloan. I was actually happy he just didn’t slap it around the boards like Juice does, though I suppose slapping it off the boards towards the middle of the defensive blueline isn’t much better.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on Jun 7, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
And Chris Burton having to go against his will and say Green was better than Weber
Cheers, Complaints, homerism and bashing of mediocre pop musicians in 140 Characters
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Kevin Sellathamby on Jun 7, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
(you and I know the truth, Weed)
On the Forecheck: preaching the Predators' gospel to the unwashed masses.
Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
You’re not?
On the Forecheck: preaching the Predators' gospel to the unwashed masses.
Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
4
I was slightly disappointed in TSlo’s year because the guy can skate, but a negative +/-, even in limited action, is just not gonna cut it for a guy hanging on to a roster spot by a thread. The nod goes to Erskine and his pugnacity, so I see Sloan and his inexplicable, yet reasonable, contract traded for a low pick.
More norrissey, less morrissey
The Vote: Rate Sloan below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season – if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 7, 2010 12:17 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
Great sig YLM. RIP Stinson and Chilton.
4 – TySlow fell just short of my modest expectations for him.
by Pi on Jun 7, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I gave him a four. I didn’t have expectations that were too high but I thought he was a reasonable fill-in last year – this year I just found him outclassed in a lot of the games he played in. I seem to remember him having a really good game against the Penguins at some point but one game out of forty isn’t enough to bump it back up to “meets expectations”.
Honestly I think we either sign/trade for a new defenseman this summer or we lock up one of our UFAs, which leaves Erskine as the 7th dman and Sloan on the outside looking in. I just don’t see how there’s room for him here anymore and I don’t see his abilities being anything beyond the occasional space filler. I hope.
Put him in Laing’s camp – plenty of heart and a guy you want to root for, but just not an NHL caliber player.
For a 10 he’d have to match his play at home with his play on the road, hit at least 20 points and really prove that he deserves a permanent spot in the lineup for the whole season.
Finishing on the positive side of the +/- spectrum also wouldn’t hurt, especially considering the firepower on this team – interestingly, everyone else who finished a minus this year is either in Hershey or on another team.
4
I was a little disappointed that he didn’t at least add more offense from the blue line, but a 5 would have been appropriate as well. Didn’t expect much out of him and he didn’t deliver a whole lot from the blue line. He did add value as a F fill in early on. I’m not sure that having him in the lineup on D gave us any sort of distinct advantage vs. playing Alzner.
My biggest frustration with Sloan is the fact that he’s re-signed despite us having a plethora of 7-8 D and the two young kids poised to play every night. It always seemed like a waste of valuable cap space. You can’t pin that on Sloan himself, though.
McPhee might be the most loyal GM in the game (maybe Ken Holland), but boy does it result in some serious head-scratchers.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
I wouldn’t have done that contract but it really amounts to nothing. If he’s on the Caps, he’s a roster player at $700K — you can’t get much cheaper than that. If GMGM needs the money for an upgrade, he’ll waive Sloan to HER. If he’s in HER, he’s probably a little overpaid but not grossly. Silly contract, but not damaging.
I agree, not damaging, but two years? I mean, I adore the guy and think he’s a great story and all that, but two years seemed like a reward for a loyal solider.
Or, maybe a two year contract makes him less attractive to another team looking to poach him off waivers on Oct. 1. Who knows. There’s a reason GMGM has his job and I don’t.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Could it make him more attractive as a spare part for a bottom feeder? I mean, I don’t think so, but that’s why I’m not a GM. Or not GMGM.
"It's always good to have vikings."
i think there are some teams looking for reasonably priced bodies with nhl experience. space fillers while the team rebuilds (aka “doigs”). you never know.
maybe chicago will take him. they are going to struggle to fill out their roster under the cap next year and i’m sure some of their top prospects cost more than tyslo
remember, we traded sami lepisto for a 5th rounder…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
5
I expected him to play in about half the games in 2010-11, contribute little offensively, be about as reliable as any 7th or 8th defenseman in the NHL, and perhaps be a better depth guy when the Caps were playing a quicker team like Montreal or Pittsburgh, as opposed to Erskine.
I got just about that.
To get a 10 next year he would have to take one of the top 6 spots on the roster and play 65-70 game. I don’t see that happening. There is a spot open in the top 6 this coming training camp, but I don’t think Sloan is the guy who fills it. The Caps have enough cap space to find a pretty good defensive defenseman to stick in that #6 spot.
Sloan is expendable, but will return little, if anything in a trade. His cap hit is very gentle, but he is not going to be a top 6 guy on most NHL teams. That he will turn 30 during the upcoming season doesn’t help him.
Honestly, if there is a way to drop him, the Caps should find it. He will be able to play professionally, but I don’t think he can contribute to a team at the Caps’ level. A team near the bottom of the NHL might have some room for him…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
I haven’t voted, but am leaning 4.
After the Pens series, I thought he was a decent option as a 7th D. Then he got a contract extension, which raised expectations further – if people who know what they’re doing like him that much, hell, he must be decent.
But watching his play throughout the year, he’s clearly not the Caps’ 7th best D right now (and that’s with Corvo, Mo and Jurcina gone), and he isn’t the 13th- or 14th best F option either, so I’m not really sure how much his versatility really helps, except in the biggest of pinches.
So yeah. A little less than I expected = 4.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I gave him a 5. I didn’t expect him to spend all 82 games on the roster. I did expect to see some growth in his game as the season wore on, which wasn’t evident. At this point, I think its what you see is what you get, the good, the bad, and the ugly. He’s a serviceable extra d-man, but I don’t know if, really, he’s serviceable for the Caps because of the younger depth coming up. His ability to play forward when needed is an added bonus on a team that is pressed against the cap, but again, is that a service the Caps need? (because they should be stuck against the cap)
So, he exceeded my expectations in a couple areas, and came in below expectations in others. Maybe I could have gone 6, based on making the Caps out of camp and sticking with them all season, but I think a 5 is more accurate given the lack of improvement in his skills as a player. When he’s on, he’s on, but when he starts to overthink things, we’ve got problems.
I’m not touching where he fits in next season, let alone in relations to the young’uns and Eskine.
As for a ten…..I’m not sure he’s capable of the ten. He’d have to look like a completely different player next season, and at 29, I’m not sure that’s possible. He’d have to become a legit 6th D-man, eliminate the panic moments, improve his on-ice positioning dramatically….you get the idea.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
sorry, last sentence of first paragraph should read: because they shouldn’t be stuck against the cap
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
I couldn’t have put this better myself. I also voted 5 (don’t be confused by my sig and avatar – jokes people!) I didn’t have great expectations for him this season, and was surprised he made the team out of camp. I think he did what was asked of him and filled in when needed.
Anyone that goes to practice regularly can attest to the fact that he’s one of the harder working players. He’s always one of the last players off the ice, whether it’s a full practice or morning skate. He’s always trying to make himself better, and I really admire him for trying to work on his flaws. There are definitely other guys that should be doing what TySlo’s doing and aren’t putting in that effort. Of course, that’s practice and we’re talking games, but still hard work and determination will eventually pay off.
Hopefully, Sloan can stick in the NHL somewhere, and the odds are that it won’t be with the Caps.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club
Team Tyler: We’re Objective While Objectifying!
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
He’s always one of the last players off the ice, whether it’s a full practice or morning skate
Not to burst your bubble, but isn’t that the case for all the scratches?
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
I’m not an idiot, I do know that. Sloan stays out longer than everyone, including the rest of the scratches. And he works one-on-one with whatever coach wants to stay out there with him. And morning skates are optional, and he’s still the last one off.
Founding member of the Tyler Sloan Fan Club
Fair enough. I did feel bad for him and the other guys who got caught scatched in early January. I remember reading that once it became evident they were on a serious win streak, BB wouldn’t touch the line ups, so that screwed any chance for them getting back in.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
my expectations for him were very high after his first game in calgary…downhill from there.
i still think he’s a valuable utility player to have around and i think he’s probably a better fill in on 4th line wing than 3rd pair dman. he played ok in spurts this year but not as consistent as i’d like. maybe thats just a fact of being in and out of the lineup…or maybe thats why he went undrafted and took 7 years to get to the show.
to get a 10 he’d have to get consistent minutes and not make me slap my forehead after every game. the guy will never be a top 4 dman so expectations are limited.
as for his $. i think he really is the cheapest dman currently under contract that has a reasonable shot at NHL playing time…other than maybe sean collins at $650K. so if the team is going to carry a 7th/8th dman, he’s the cheapest one we got. that said, i wouldnt be surprised if he’s a trade throw in or they try and move him for a draft pick or “future considerations”.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
five rating
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 7, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
6
No real expectations that he would be here all year. Played better than expected at forward and scored on Brodeur. Sometimes looked like and NHL defenseman and sometimes looked like he belonged in Hershey, but he seemed to be paired with Erskine a lot , so how much better could he have done?
He skates pretty well, plays a physical style, and blocks some shots…for me all a bit better than expected. I could live with him as 7D over Erskine, especially if we are able to bring in a solid shut down veteran D to mentor 52 and Alznerson, as discussed today in the clips thread.
7
I had no expectations of him at the beginning of the season. He’s not an NHL-caliber defenseman – even as a 7th defenseman – so he exceeded my expectations simply by suiting up for 40 games.
So my brother ran into ShaMo and Laich at Front Page in late March. He wished them "good luck" for the upcoming playoffs. When he told me this story I got really pissed and blurted: "You wished THEM luck?!? They need to wish us fans luck for the excruciating way they'll manage to break our hearts this spring." They didn't disappoint.
With John Carlson and Karl Alzner poised to make the leap to the NHL next year, are Tyler Sloan’s days as the seventh/eighth defenseman coming to an end?
His contract says otherwise, unless he takes over the 13/14F spot for Laing.
Does his versatility and ability to jump into a forward role when needed make him more valuable than John Erskine or can/should he be moved?
I’d presume if he was that valuable to other teams he would have been signed last year. I’m guessing his agility makes him a better default 7D pick that Erskine, unless Philly or some other slower and tougher team is in town.
What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
Tip the concessions guy?
They're coming.
5
He had an average year, with ups and downs. Didn’t really expect much.
Also, I already know Ovechwin gave him a 10. Don’t lie!
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Eric Fehr needs more damn ice time.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS!
You know you wanna.
Proof! I need proof!
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Eric Fehr needs more damn ice time.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS!
You know you wanna.
D’awww…
I’ve been on SB Nation for a few months and still feel like a newbie.
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
Eric Fehr needs more damn ice time.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS!
You know you wanna.
Natty’s skilllz are above and beyond.
by CapitalCentre on Jun 7, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
clicking on SBN profiles ≠ a skill. not really. but thanks!
starting at someone’s profile page can be nice, especially for infrequent posters like ice warrior and sk84fun_dc who always add something interesting. if i’ve been away for a week or two, i might scroll threw the profiles of a few of my favorite commenters to see what they’ve been up to.
I have no problem with someone giving Sloan a 7. I don’t think it’d be fair to give him less than a 4 or more than an 8, but I think reasonable folks can pick almost any number in between, depending on your expectations and on how you value what he contributed.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 7, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
5
He pretty much did exactly what I expected – play a fill-in role (at times fairly well, at others looking just like a fill-in).
With the addition of our young defensmen, and perhaps a veteran TBD, he sits as the 7th/8th guy, and pretty much the same role for the upcoming year, however with even fewer appearances.
To me, he is slightly more valuable than Erskine, and if the choice has to be made to move one of them, my vote would be to move Erskine. Ideally we’d be in a situation where neither of their services are required, so here’s to the off-season and younger player’s developements.
A replacement level player who knows the system and who the coaching staff is comfortable with at slightly better than minimum salary is a valuable commodity.
He did exactly what I thought he’d do. I wavered between 5 and 6. Gave him the 6 because he looks like Mark Hamill.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
For some reason when I look at Tyler Sloan, I think Dany Heatley.
"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"
"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."
Mark Hamill’s high school picture?
If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak.
by Hang a Laingtern on Your Problems on Jun 7, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions
tough call, I ultimately went with 5
On the one hand, he exceeded my expectations simply by staying with the big club all year and playing in 40 games. On the other hand, his play in those 40 games was sub-par, and a bit worse than I would have expected / hoped for from a guy who is getting ice time, even as a 7th/8th option.
The Discussion: With John Carlson and Karl Alzner poised to make the leap to the NHL next year, are Tyler Sloan’s days as the seventh/eighth defenseman coming to an end? Does his versatility and ability to jump into a forward role when needed make him more valuable than John Erskine or can/should he be moved?
Yeah, I think his days are done here. the only question is do the caps keep Erskine at 1.2 or Sloan at 0.7? Erskine is a better defender and brings the angry, so unless we end up very tight against the cap I think Erskine gets the nod. Sloan’s versatility to play either F or D is mitigated by the fact that he doesn’t do either particularly well; it’s only really useful if he’s already in the lineup at one of the 2 spots on a nightly basis, and can take over “in-game” for an injured player if needed. Otherwise, we have better 7th D and 13th F options in the system IMO.
What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
Earn a regular spot on the 3rd D pairing or 4th F group, and be a solid contributor at that position. If he can draw a regular shift every night and not be a liability, that’s about the best I ever see him doing.
I see Erskine and Sloan having different roles. Erskine is the guy you put in when someone needs a break. Sloan is your insurance policy. If you need to get through a month of the regular season with 5 solid D and Sloan, it’s not really going to hurt you all that badly. Just make sure you have enough depth going into the playoffs so he doesn’t have to play then.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 7, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
4
Maybe he just likes it up in Hershey.. can’t blame him… all that chocolate… mmmmmmmmmmm
Plus in the off season, it’s probably less of a line at the roller coasters. More than enough reason to not want to get stuck living in DC :)
I’m genuinely curious to hear Ovechwin’s rationale, considering the dramatic opening post.
I give him a 5. He was thrust into a role that he’s really not good enough to play (7th D on an NHL team) when we had better alternatives, but he acquitted himself fairly well despite that.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Jun 7, 2010 2:21 PM EDT reply actions
her rationale
reasonable enough, from clips:
I intend on giving him a 7 because I didn’t expect him to stick the whole year and he didn’t shit the bed. He filled in where and when he was needed, and did a half ways decent job.
5
I was neither overwhelmed nor underwhelmed. I was utterly whelmed by his performance.
Don't celebration when you score goal
by Big Boutros on Jun 7, 2010 2:37 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Fitting you used underwhelmed.
I believe in JC.
by patred48 on Jun 7, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ten Things I Hate About You fan?
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
It’s only because he doesn’t have a Prada backpack.
If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak.
by Hang a Laingtern on Your Problems on Jun 7, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Cinqo
Did what he needed to do: filled in.
Not gonna be around next year, I imagine. Two new guys coming in for sure, and guys in hershey that can fill at forward when needed. Sloan was an economical stop gap whose year can be summed up as “no harm, no foul”. The team needs to have an overabundance of 4’s and 5’s not 7th and 8th defensemen, like they do now.
Move along, there’s not much else to see.
The Way is riddled with deep, dark holes.
Not gonna be around next year, I imagine.
well he’ll be around. somewhere. because we’ve got him under contract.
Right. Tyler Sloan should be the defense’s Quintin Laing. And hopefully he plays as much for the Caps next year as Q did this year.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 7, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I won’t vote since I didn’t follow the caps as seriously until this year and didn’t have a good idea of who he was until I found this blog in the middle of the year (totally changed how I follow the caps (and thanks to everybody for that, i’ll try to be less of a lurker))
This is one where the description of what we’re voting on is really important. While he is the punchline of many jokes, unless you expected anything, you can’t give him less than a 5.
I think he should get more ice time after he wins the norris this year and then repeats for the next decade (kidding).
unless you expected anything, you can’t give him less than a 5
I guess I just wonder who goes into the season expecting nothing from someone. His numbers were pretty lousy, he played 40 games out of a possible 82, he got chances on the PK and didn’t do very well – I expected him to do better than that.
Like I said elsewhere, I think anyone expecting him to be a 20+ minute guy who does everything well and has a high +/- is delusional…but expecting him to be able to keep up with the NHL pace after making the team isn’t, and I don’t believe he did that. He also didn’t utterly fail at everything and I didn’t expect that much so I didn’t drop him lower than a 4.
7
Expectations, then +1 because I honestly didn’t think he’d stick around for the year, and another +1 because his November goals helped prove this guy’s case that he can center anyone and make them better:

As far as next season, again I don’t see him around here next year. He’s not what we need in D, and I’d rather see some Hershey guys fill in for the extra forward.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
Sloan has been an inspirational story of a career minor leaguer who finally made the big time even though he wasn’t really the most effective defender.
I think that’s why he won the hearts of many fans here, even if he wasn’t good enough to play with the Caps on a regular basis.
Rocking the Red since 1975
6
Upped him one over a 5 cause he kinda has a Jack-Nicholson-as-The-Joker face.
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.
4
Anyone that can skate that well should be more useful. He didn’t stick in the NHL because of his play, it was because of his waiver status. He needs to be in HER.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on Jun 8, 2010 12:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I watched every Cap game this year and Sloan had 3 or 4 games out of 40 that he probably wished he could play over. Can’t say that for the rest of the Caps D. They all make mistakes and they all have crappy games from time to time. Sloan showed up to training camp & according to BB & many fans he was the best D at camp — that’s what earned him a spot on the roster. Although not a rookie in the AHL he was a rookie D on the Caps, given there were 8 other D-men - all who had 2 – 11+ years NHL experience, so it didn’t surprise me that he didn’t play every game. Then GM played Corvo continuously and imho he was definitely NOT an upgrade (Corvo: 52 NHL games 09/10, 2 Goals, 4 assists, -10 Reg. Season). Sloan played about 12 games as a Forward, played 40 games total (fewer minutes), 2 Goals, 4 assists, -1 Reg. Season. I would challenge any of the Caps D -- if any of them switched between forward and D, were not in the line-up regularly, sometimes missing 5 or 6 games or more before playing again — could they do better??? Confidence and regular play are both huge factors in performance. I think if Sloan had been given a fair shake this year, his play and numbers would have been much better. Hopefully next season he’ll get an opportunity to prove himself. The jury’s still out on this one and I, for one, would like to see what he can do with a full season of regular play.
I watched every Cap game this year
Most of the active commentators here are either STHs or watch 90%+ of the games on television.
You’re seriously going to compare counting stats with Joe Corvo, who spent 30 games in IR because Alzner’s skate lacerated a tendon in his leg? The same Joe Corvo who spent most of his season on one of the league’s worst teams?
Confidence and regular play aren’t huge factors in performance as such – there’s a selection bias at work. Players who play continuously tend to be better at their jobs than ones that get benched. There are individual cases where that’s not necessarily true, but it’s more likely that there were better D (or Fs) available to do the job than Tyler Sloan.
Here’s the Corsi report for the Caps D at 5v5. Please take note that despite playing with teammates who are more or less the equals of the opposition in terms of relative +/- and teammates that are vastly superior to opponents in relative Corsi, the Caps get massively outshot when Sloan is on the ice, to the tune of -10.3 attempts per 60 when he’s on the ice. The only D who’s even close to as bad is John Erskine, at -7.8 per 60. Everyone else is 7.5 attempts or more in the right direction, capping out at, you guessed it, Joe Corvo at 18.2 attempts per 60 better than Tyler Sloan. Granted, Corvo plays with better teammates than his competition, but it doesn’t account for the difference observed there.
Corvo is miles, leagues and light-years better than Tyler Sloan. If you’re going to target anyone for Sloan to replace, it’s Erskine, not Corvo.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 9, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs




































