Monday Caps Clips
Your savory breakfast links:
- Five years from now, we might look back on the 2010 Draft and tab the Caps as the weekend's biggest winners. [SI]
- Dmitry Chesnokov chats with Caps first-rounder Evgeny Kuznetsov (pictured, in his "I fight for truth, justice and the Capitals way" pose). [Puck Daddy]
- Video of the Caps making the Kuznetsov pick. [FanShot]
- Sam Carrier gets some recognition from the press back in Lewiston. [Lewiston Sun Journal]
- A bit on Philipp Grubauer. [Goalie Guild (scroll down)]
- The Caps "would love the Vancouver Canucks' Willie Mitchell on the open market if his health is good." So would I. [Edmonton Journal]
- Would Shawn Horcoff be an ideal second-line center for the Caps? Not at that cap hit. [Edmonton Journal (with a note on Chris Bourque, too)]
- Tomas Fleischmann: the ninth-best Czech hockey player in the world in 2009-10? [Prague Daily Monitor]
- Is the Southeast Division emerging from "laughing stock" status? The group certainly got a lot better at the Draft. [PHT]
- An organization-wide look at the Caps' blueline. [Live In Red]
- In the weekend's Clips you saw a couple of goofy pics of the Caps' top-two picks, but they weren't alone in being hazed (only explanation I can come up with for these shots). [Puck Daddy]
- Per the HHoF, on this date back in 1994, "Washington Capitals traded Mike Ridley with a 1st round draft choice in 1994 (Eric Fichaud) to the Toronto Maple Leafs, in exchange for Rob Pearson and a 1st round draft choice in 1994 (Nolan Baumgartner)."
- Finally, happy 43rd birthday to Patrice Lefebvre (who is nothing if not well-traveled).
343 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What about your KHL contract? You have 2 years left, is it correct?
Yes, I do have two years left on my KHL contract. But I would really want to come over earlier. A compensation for my contract needs to be paid. It is my childhood dream to play in the NHL.
This makes me very happy. I was afraid after he’d said before that he wants to finish his KHL deal.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
If memory (and Dmitry’s Twitter) serves, I think the player has to pony up two-thirds of the remaining contract value if he wants a buyout. Interesting if he wants to do it, but I don’t know if that cools whatever relations the K and N currently have with each other.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on Jun 28, 2010 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions
From the Bourque link
He’s still under contract to the Caps, but their GM George McPhee shrugged. "They (Russians) do whatever they want to do," he said.
Without a proper transfer agreement in place it’s all ad hoc solutions between khl and nhl so it’s hard to predict what will cause problems and what will be ok.
What can I say I’m a JP fangirl. I will follow him into the darkest and filthiest of alleys, even the comment section at Puck Daddy.
Well yeah, that goes without saying.
Look at this signature line. Notice the lack of spelling errors and self-whoring?
by Bald Pollack on Jun 28, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Not a big loss if he goes anyway…oh well.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions
From everything I’ve read, Evgeny Kuznetsov seems to have a great attitude.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Jun 28, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Hilarious comment of the day (from the Muir article)
A few days earlier, the B’s GM dealt the 15th overall pick as part of a package that landed first-line winger Nathan Horton from the Panthers. That’s just solid asset management. Now if only new team president Cam Neely can light a fire under Horton’s slow-boil competitive instincts
Anytime you include the phrase “solid asset management” with “Peter Chiarelli” in the same segment, you’re doing it wrong.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 7:47 AM EDT reply actions
With the Maple Leafs. I know GMBB is a good GM, but he got hosed.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
Yup…basically ended up being Kessel for Seguin. Yowza. A bit of hubris on Burke’s part to think that they would be a playoff-worthy team this year, thus making a first round pick not so bad.
could be another lottery pick next year…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I think a LOT of people thought they would be playoff-worthy this year. I’m in agreement with next year’s first though. Two first rounders is pretty steep for most of the players in this league.
At any rate, Kessel is still only 22 years old.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I wasn’t one of them – not that I’m such a genius or anything, I just didn’t get how stocking up on big, slow defensemen (who were made to look better thanks to much more skilled D partners) was going to get them to the playoffs.
Kessel is still young, it’s true. And he’s not awful, but he certainly doesn’t have the ceiling that Seguin does. Plus from everything I’ve heard from the Bruins side, he wasn’t the best teammate. Lots of comments about him not being willing to play hurt, etc.
…and I just always want to punch him when I see him. But that’s neither here nor there.
He needs a set up guy. Most def. Saw that much in the Olympics.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Willie Mitchell
I’d take him in a heartbeat – more Clarkson alum on the Caps is full of win. Although the last Clarkson grad that played here happened to have a pretty lengthy injury history as well…
"If you want money go to the bank, if you want bread go to the bakery if you want goals go to the net." - #21
Would love to have Mitchell on the Caps as well. He’s one on a very short list of players that seem to get Ovechkin off his game some. He’s got all the skills and would fit in nicely with the Caps as Poti’s partner, and would allow Bruce to not have to play Carlson and Alzner at 24 minutes a night (they’ll get there soon enough, but they don’t have to do it in their early 20s…)
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Also got this tidbit from the Horcoff link:
The Minnesota Wild liked Owen Nolan’s competitive fire the last two years but aren’t keen on bringing back the free-agent. He would like to finish his career in San Jose, where he has a home, although Washington or Pittsburgh, with a chance to win a Cup, would be better for him. It’s easier travel.
If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
"It's not fair. He's just a pitcher." - Dave Jageler
Sprechen sie Englisch?
I know Nolan is a RW, but I wouldn’t mind seeing him replace Flieschmann on the second line.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Jun 28, 2010 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Owen Nolan ain’t no 2nd liner anymore. Still, he may be a big part of what this team needs come playoff time. Laich – Belanger – Nolan is the kind of line that can do some serious damage in the playoffs.
I never realized that Nolan never won a Cup. He could be a great story next year if he plays for a contender.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions
He’d provide solid veteran leadership to kids like Knuble.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Jun 28, 2010 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
And show Alex Semin how to really pick a corner.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 28, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Against an All-Star goaltender, no less.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m starting to get myself wound up thinking about this. Owen Nolan at about a million bucks would be a fantastic pickup. He might make every forward on the team better — including Ovechkin, since he’s probably one of the few forwards in the league that Ovi would listen to these days. And how awesome would it be to see Nolan finally get a Cup?
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
He’d be a healthy scratch most nights, sometimes filling in on the fourth. It only really works if we move a right wing (unlikely).
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
I don’t think he’d be a healthy scratch, but the point underscores how little need we have for him. You don’t bring a guy like Nolan in to sit in a suit, and I don’t see which wing we give up. If Fehr or Flash get poached on a RFA sheet maybe GMGM looks at him, but that’s about the only way I see.
I waited all year for this?
Yea I remember AO saying Nolan was his favorite player before so he would probably listen to him a la grandpa feds
1 mill for Nolan. Get it done GMGM
Proud member of the Popsicle Division of the Cupcake Conference.
by Bman21212 on Jun 28, 2010 9:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I really liked the idea of acquiring Nolan this past season at the deadline. At this point, though, I’m not as sure. I don’t think he can give you second-line minutes at this point and isn’t really a third-line type player. Does Owen Nolan want to be a fourth-liner? Then what of Bradley?
Put another way,
Ovechkin – Backstrom – Knuble
Laich – ?? – Semin
Chimera – ?? – Fehr
Gordon – Steckel – Bradley
Where does Nolan fit in?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Your line up is also missing Flash. I know we all hope GMGM dumps him but I don’t see that happening
Proud member of the Popsicle Division of the Cupcake Conference.
Your line up is also missing Flash.
It’s my projected “Game 7” lineup, I suppose, not the “early regular season” iteration. Flash is in the press box.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Jun 28, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Flash not in the line up? Guess the caps are getting a new coach haha
Proud member of the Popsicle Division of the Cupcake Conference.
See Game 7 vs. Montreal – even the current coach knew the guy was unplayable.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
The important question is how long that realization lasts. I don’t think very long. He’ll convince himself that the off-season workout is all he needed and give him the long leash again.
I waited all year for this?
Or he’ll be hesitant to let history repeat itself and go with a short leash, as he did with JT60 come playoff time.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I think you’re right. For me, I like 3rd or 4th line guys to be “energy” guys or shut down guys, and he’s definitely not that player at this point.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions
But our 3rd line is a scoring line that plays 10-12 a night. He’d fit perfectly on there.
I waited all year for this?
Who do you sit? Chimera and Fehr bring more to the table at this point.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
We do not know. Per Tim Leone last week:
Beagle, with his penalty-killing prowess and ability to play center and wing, may have the best chance to make Washington’s opening-night roster, especially if free-agent grinder Quintin Laing departs. …
If Laing can’t land an NHL one-way or an NHL-AHL two-way, Hershey would loom as a logical landing spot if he has to accept an AHL one-way.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I always forget. What is the difference between one and two way contracts?
Proud member of the Popsicle Division of the Cupcake Conference.
A one way contract the player gets paid the same no matter if he’s in the AHL or NHL, two way contract means that Laing would get paid x amount in the A, or y amount in the NHL.
On the Forecheck: preaching the Predators' gospel to the unwashed masses.
Twitter/Cycle Like the Sedins
by Chris Burton on Jun 28, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Basically just the money – a one-way deal means a guy makes his NHL salary whether he’s in the AHL or NHL, while a two-way deal allows for different salaries at the two levels. (It’s important to note that EA Sports video games have no idea what the difference is and are dead wrong in their application of the terms.)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Jun 28, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was just going to point out the EA thing. Hopefully they’ll fix that in the next installment.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Right – in EA, one-way means a guy has to go through waivers to be sent to the AHL, two-way means no waivers. This is flat-out wrong.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I wonder if they just did that for simplicity’s sake? Would be nice if they had an option where you could do a real, genuine “sim style” management with all the current CBA rules, and another one with the simpler system they use now.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions
They do have it. It’s called Eastside.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
What the eff? Even NHL 2010’s buyouts count against the cap!
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
With nice fancy charts!
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Line graphs rule, man.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s wrong, but I can say it benefits me more as a GM in a video game than the other way around. I mean, what, my virtual owner is gonna get pissed that he’s got 30 million dollars in two way contracts stewing in the minors?
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
perhaps he sits in the press box during the regular season, starts working into the lineup after semin has been dealt and is fresh for the playoffs. a bit far fetched, but let me be the millionth person to say he’s just the type of guy this team could use in the playoffs. a typical deadline deal guy (i.e. the “bill guerin” guy everyone wants in march) that we just pickup a bit early and maybe a bit cheaper.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Where does Nolan fit? First of all, I love Brooks Laich, but if he’s on the second line I don’t think this team is winning a Cup. Looking at the offensive depth of Chicago and Philly, I just don’t see Laich as that kind of player. He’s a great forward to have, but he’s no star.
Jason Chimera is a nice player, but he definitely is not a Bruce Boudreau 3rd line player. Manos de piedra ain’t going to do it for a team with cup aspirations.
Move Laich to the 3rd line. Slide Semin back to LW. Now you’ve got the RW slots open on the 2nd and 3rd lines. One of them is Fehr, the other is Nolan.
Ovechkin – Backstrom – Knuble
Semin – ?? – Fehr
Laich – ?? – Nolan
The bottom line shakes out however it does. I like Matt Bradley. But Nolan scored 45 points in 59 games two years ago, and 33 in a full season last year. I don’t think you ask what of Matt “10 goal career year” Bradley if you get the chance to add Nolan.
Nolan’s only 38. Mark Recchi’s 42 and going strong. Besides, what did we all think was missing in the Montreal series? Don’t you think Nolan alone could have made the difference there?
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Is Fehr ready for the second line?
I think he is, and irrespective of whether we sign Nolan or not, I like the idea of Semin moving back over to the left and putting Laich on 3L, and presumably Chimmer on 4L.
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I far prefer Laich on the second, personally. He’s kind of like Clark in that he can be efficient on any line, but he’s not super old and declining.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, I love his game in that regard. However, I would see a potentially better defensive second line with Sasha and EF (given we get a kickass pivot) with most, if not all, the offensive upside.
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Laich didn’t impress at ES this season too much, IIRC. I’m a bit hesitant.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
hesitant with Laich at the 3L?
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
My comment was more in reply to WM. Less ES TOI, more PP TOI and PKTOI for Laich, so 3W not 2W
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I totally agree with this. During the regular season, Laich did score 4 more goals than Fehr (25 vs 21), but he played in 9 more games, averaging 6 more minutes and 7 more shifts per game. Imagine Fehr’s numbers if he had second line time.
And if we were to go with Matty P or Marcus J as 3C, Brooks would provide some vet leadership for the line.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
so are we all assuming here that Belanger doesn’t return? I really like the guy, but we’ve got some younger and cheaper options like you said
And yeah, MP and MJ could probably play 3C, but i’d be disappointed if the Caps don’t pick any 2C up and let the youngins battle it out.
I think the Caps would bring him back for 1 or at most two years, but he wants 3 or 4, which would not fit the Caps’ development timeline.
Thats what I was thinking. He could be a solid 3C that brings some help on the PK. But I hope he ends up somewhere good for him, cause he’s got some heart.
The articles we had earlier about this (all from the French-Canadian press) indicated that he would also like to go to MTL. Dunno if that was just b/c he was talking to HabsNation media.
The gist of his comments was that, at 32, this is likely to be his last big contract and he wants to make it count.
MON might like him because he speaks French, but I don’t think it makes a lot of sense. They just traded for Ellar, and he’s at most a year from the NHL. They have Gomez and Plekanec signed forever. Why are you going to continue to force your new best prospect out of the lineup?
I waited all year for this?
Because they need more Quebecois, duh.
Seriously, some of the Montreal media were bitching because the Habs took – GASP – an American in the first round. Don’t have the exact link but one of the major Habs blogs, All Habs, talks about it here. Montreal MSM is disgusting sometimes.
The Habs LOVE Americans in the first round. It’s hysterical. Komisarek, Higgins, McDonagh, Kriso, and I’m pretty sure Pacioretty.
I waited all year for this?
Yup, Max Pac was a 1st rounder – Kristo wasn’t, though, I believe he was in the 2nd round. But still.
Of course they also went on to trade 3 of those guys away…
But the French media is in panic mode. Only 22 QMJHL kids drafted this year. 40+ from the W and high 30’s from the O.
and not all those Q kids are French-Canadian. Must be further fueling the panic.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Laich also spent a good chunk of time on the PP. I don’t think you can win the whole thing without guys like Brooks, but he’s by no means irreplaceable on the ice.
His BtN numbers are wholly uninspiring, especially considering how much time he spent playing with Semin and that he spent almost 3 minutes a night on the PP.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 28, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
His ability to play all three F positions (plus occasionally at D) is useful, but ultimately has kept him pinging around on different lines. And he went through that long dry spell mid-season.
#brookslaichisstillpracticing
I’m holding that dry spell against him, just like I’d hold it against everyone else.
He spent over 50% of his ES ice with Semin, regardless of who was centering them. Relative to the team, Semin was a +4.9 Corsi events per 60 on the ice, Laich was -3.5. AS28 is a first line talent, but BL21 may be better served on the third line.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 28, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Sometimes it’s our most flexible guys who have the most problem getting a stable spot,
Brooksie can do either the second line or the third and is productive on either one, but seems to function best as a left winger
Fehr can function on any of the 4 lines, as a right winger but is probably best on the 2nd or 3rd line.
Semin can function as either a left or right winger on one of the top lines although his natural position is left wing.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Fehr was actually very productive on the 2nd line when both Knuble and Semin were out. And he was productive there last year.
I actually consider Fehr a second line type player.
Only one problem with moving Semin to left wing — Ovi takes extra long shifts so many times and Semin would get short shrift in the ice time department. Along with the fact that couldn’t put Ovi and Semin together.
That being said, I’d be curious to see what would happen on a line with both Semin and Fehr,
Rocking the Red since 1975
3rd line Right Wing – Fehr to fourth line left, Gordon to Center, Steckel to Press box. Only snarking a little.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
If I recall correctly, the Caps inquired about Nolan last year at the deadline – he said he wanted to stay in Minnesota. Love the loyalty but I remember thinking he would have been a nice pickup, I really like him.
But like JP and others have said, not sure where he fits now. I would have taken him over Flash in a heartbeat but beyond that I don’t see a place for him.
The Ridley Trade...
I think the trade of Ridley to the Leafs began the end of two eras. It certainly was the beginning of the end of Rids’ career as a player. He never was the same player after he left the Caps and wasn’t all that effective. It also might be the beginning of the end of David Poile’s run as GM of the Caps. He had built a good team in DC, but the team that was strong in the late 1980s and early 1990s was fading, and while the Caps had some success at the minor level (Portland, the farm team back then, was just coming off a Calder Cup championship), there were no results at the NHL level, especially in the post season. Part of that was the Penguins, of course, but one could say the high point of the Poile era was the 1994 playoffs when the Caps beat the Pens. The loss to the Rangers in round 2 wasn’t a surprise, the Caps actually played very well in that series, but they were playing the accumulated parts of the Edmonton Oiler dynasty as well as several players from the 1992 Blackhawks (who lost the Cup final) and of course the Rangers themselves. The Rangers were a better team in 1994.
Pearson didn’t do much of anything for the Caps, and Baumgartner never did much for the Caps either… all in all, not one of the high points in Poile’s career.
The saddest part of it all, was that Ridley was at the Caps season ticket holder draft party (as was I…) at the old Cap Centre to sign autographs during the draft. Unlike most players traded at the draft, Rids got a chance to get a round of applause and appreciation from the fans when traded at the draft… you could tell though that he was not happy about the situation…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 9:47 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Mike, I appreciate the historical perspective. I know about certain players and some big picture stuff about the Poile era, but I was born in 1981 and I wasn’t even sentient until the early 90s so the detailed perspective and the trends you highlight help fill in my 1980s Caps knowledge. I don’t have much to add, just wanted you to know it’s appreciated by at least one of the young bucks around here.
And yeah, that ’94 Rags team was scary.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on Jun 28, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed. I pretty much wasn’t even aware of the Caps until around 1996 when I started going to games, and didn’t start really following the team until 1999.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Jun 28, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
So in summation, keep up the good work Mike.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Jun 28, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks Ghost and F&B. Will do. Being an STH for a quarter century has had it’s moments…
I am still hearing that ping off the post 15 years ago by Peter Bondra in OT in Game 5 up in Pittsburgh…if he scores that goal, the Caps beat the Pens 4-1 in that series (this was one of the 3-1 leads they blew) and who knows what the history of the Pens and Caps looks like now… probably very different.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
just keep telling yourself how much sweeter it will be when the Caps finally win it all.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Damn Mike you had to remind me of the Bondra post vs the Pens lol. Ridley was always one of my fave players with the Caps when he was here and I always loved Poile’s trade to get Rids and Miller here for Bobby Carpenter as one of my favourite of GMDP’s deals.
As a longtime fan like you, I always appreciate the nostalgia trips Mike. Keep em coming
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory
by Rather Bengt on Jun 28, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
The Ridley-Miller trade for Carpenter was the trade that moved my loyalties from the Rangers (I grew up in NY) to the Caps. I moved here in 1985, and seeing my favorite Ranger (Miller) come to DC… it was a no-brainer.
Of course, if Glenn Ford or Ted Turner buys the Flames in 1980 instead of Nelson Skalbania (who moved them to Calgary 30 years ago) and they stay in ATL, I might still be a Flames fan. Again growing up in NY, the Rangers were on pay-cable TV (you had to pay extra for MSG Network back then) but the Flames were on WTBS, all of the away games and about half the home games. I got to see 55-60 Flames games on TV and only 30 or so Ranger games…including their games in Atlanta. I would go the MSG to see the Flames routinely beat the Rangers as well. I’d be the only person there in the fire-engine red jersey with the big “A” in the front…
Ah well, now it’s Caps all the way… but I do check in on Calgary every so often. :D
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 29, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Today kicks off a very busy week:
June 28: Qualifying offers due to restricted free agentsBackstrom, Boyd Gordon, Eric Fehr, Fleischmann, Jeff Schultz and a handful of prospects.
June 29: RFAs who remain unsigned can begin talking to other teams.
July 1: Free agent signing period opens. After this year’s first round disappointment, GM George McPhee figures to be busier than he had anticipated. Also,Theodore,Joe Corvo,Scott Walker,Shaone Morrisonn, Eric Belanger,Brendan Morrison,Milan Jurcina, Quintin Laing (and Alexander Giroux) become unrestricted free agents if not signed prior to this date.
5: Deadline for players to request salary arbitration. (Hearing dates are usually held in Toronto in late July and August). Boyd Gordon, Schultz, Fehr and Fleischmann are eligible.
Wouldn’t shock me in the least if Giroux heads for the K.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Intriguing Tweet from Kettler Capitals Iceplex:
Proshop closes at 8pm tonight for inventory prep. Closed Tuesday 6/29. We will reopen by noon Wednesday.
Adding some new jerseys perhaps? Certainly marking down some old ones. :/
Fiscal year end of June 30th, probably.
Sorry, professional opinion there.
"It's always good to have vikings."
The Caps and the NHL operate on a fiscal year that ends on June 30, so that makes perfect sense.
Every retailer needs to do inventory at least once a year…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually, the pro shop is not owned by the Caps, so that likely has nothing to do with it.
"It's always good to have vikings."
I thought the Caps owned the rink and most everything with it?
Ah well, even then, it would make sense for the pro shop at the Caps practice facility to run their calendar the same as the Caps.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 29, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
reminds me, I need to buy a Theo shirt immediately!
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
You might wait until July 1 as he once he signs elsewhere they could go on a discount rack…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m terrified they’ll just get pulled from NHL.com entirely.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
From NHL.com yes, from the pro-shop and/or the store at the arena… probably not.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 29, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Ive been hearing some talk that Fleischmann is looking to get Plekanec-type money.
#NeedsMoreBradley
Well, his agent said Plekanec is a comparable…
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
His agent’s technically correct, if you’re looking entirely at their nationalities and numbers.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
and they were both detrimental to the Caps in the playoffs
If you want to survive out here, you've got to know where your towel is.
by ns on Jun 28, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 9 recs
If Flash’s agent uses Plekanec in arbitration as a comprable for Flash, he will lose and lose big… there is a big difference to their games. The numbers are similar over the season, but if you look at the second half of last year….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually that’s a reasonable question from both sides.
Where are you hearing it?
Where is Flash going to get that kind of $$?
Well played.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
From where? If he is, even I’m gonna go “Fuck that guy.”
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s hard to believe he really thinks he’s worth that much. I don’t think he could be that delusional. Some of us tend to assign off ice behavioral traits to certain players because of how they are on the ice, and most of the time those situations have been proven completely false.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Agents gotta do what agents gotta do.
Nobody ever made their client more money by offering less than what was available. What he’s asking for in June and what he’s signed for in October are completely different things.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I can’t imagine he’s looking for the 6 year, 30-million dollar contract, but probably closer to what Plekanec made when he was RFA last year: 2.75 million. And if it goes to arbitration, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him get that.
"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"
"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."
by Wheeler on Jun 28, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It would be a gross overpayment even if Flash gets $2.75.
If you want to survive out here, you've got to know where your towel is.
Hey, at least he had a good shooting %.
Look at this signature line. Notice the lack of spelling errors and self-whoring?
by Bald Pollack on Jun 28, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Can the Caps afford to pay him that much?
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Probably not, but an arbitrator doesn’t give a damn about the Caps cap situation.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
No, but the Caps still have the option to walk away after the arbiter names a contract, right?
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
If the Caps want to go to arb, they are bound by the decision. They can walk away if Flash decides to go to arb.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Don’t know about that. Does an arbitrator have any sway on his RFA vs UFA status?
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Teams can walk away from a limited number of player arb decisions every few years. The Caps could walk away from a Flash arb decision. He’d become a UFA
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
And if it goes to arbitration, I can’t wait for the mock up.
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
sounds reasonable if by “plekanec type money” you mean flash wants to get paid in us dollars.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m still amused by GMGM’s wink at the Camera as he stood up from the draft table before making the first selection. Was that directed at the Camera, or someone behind it?
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
do you have a link to this? I’d love to see it.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
thanks! and it was awesome
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
George has a sense of humor and more importantly, a sense of honor. I can’t think of any other GM who would go into another team’s locker room to confront a coach about their team’s behavior during a preseason game.
George got into a fight, ended up with a black eye and a suspension, but he also ended up with a team of players that would run through brick walls for him.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
i think the hawks gm was the one who ended up with the black eye. mcphee might have broken his hand. george is not big, but he didnt mind the fistics as a player.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
here’s a New York Times article. it was the Blackhawks coach, Lorne Molleken, who found himself on the wrong side of GMGM unleashing the fury.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
George took on anyone and everyone when he played with the Rangers (back when I was in college…) You should check out his fight card at hockeyfights.com
Here it is: http://www.hockeyfights.com/players/9980
In one playoff series in 1987, he went at it with Dave Brown and (wait for it) Craig Berube of the Flyers. In the 1986 playoffs he fought with Rick Tocchet and John Kordic. He also took on Tocchet twice during that regular season as well as Lane Lambert of Detroit twice in one game!
Some tough customers on this list…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 29, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
More...
Here’s a list of all of GMGM’s opponents on the ice:
http://www.hockeyfights.com/players/9980/fightcard_quickie
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 29, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe to his kid, a la the phone call during the ’06 draft?
Look at this signature line. Notice the lack of spelling errors and self-whoring?
by Bald Pollack on Jun 28, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
I loved that whole sequence. From the wink, to the announcing the name really quickly and practically walking away from the mic mid-Kuznetsov…just very confident and loose and certain that we got our guy. It almost looked like he was smirking at the rest of the room, but not in a douche-y kind of way.
Basically GMGM > anyone else’s GM.
Anyone else feeling a little more suspicious after drafting these Russians that making a FA offer to Volchenkov is part of what the Caps have planned? There’s probably no relation between the draft and FA, but I do wonder if “what we’re doing in Ovechkin” (as GMGM said in explaining why the Caps are not afraid to draft Russian players) carries over to FA. I could also see a critical mass of Russians helping get these guys signed for a little less money.
I have a hunch that the Caps aren’t going to spend a lot to try to fix the 2C situation in FA. I’m not sure if they spend big on D, but you have to think the other Eastern contenders plan to with the way Hamhuis’ rights have been passed around.
Unlikely, in my opinion. With the way Hamhuis is bouncing around, I’d love to sign him on day one of free agency just to spit on both Philly and Pittsburgh, preferably for two years at dirt cheap.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
And as much as we like Hamhuis, we should all keep in mind that it’s not as if he’s the next Nick Lidstrom. He’s just the best of what’s available right now.
Plus the teams going after him were Philly, who just like to stockpile D because they have no one in net (and interesting that after Hamhuis’s rights went away they targeted Nabokov…) and Pittsburgh, who is really getting desperate for NHL-caliber bodies on the blueline.
Speaking of Pittsburgh, it boggles my mind that Gonchar still thinks he’s worth 5 a year.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Five what? Rubles?
Every bursted bubble has a glory! Each abysmal failure makes a point! Every glowing path that goes astray,shows you how to find a better way. So every time you stumble never grumble. Next time you'll bumble even less!
by STLSpidey on Jun 28, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Five milly yo
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
all about the Benjamins, baby.
or, as G.O.D says “an agent’s gotta do what an agent’s gotta do.”
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
5 a year for at least 3 years, right? I think that was the sticking point, Pittsburgh only wants to give him 2 years.
Guy’s 36 and still thinks he commands that type of money and that term. Unreal. I actually want him to stay just because I think he makes their defense stronger if he leaves – addition by subtraction, you know. Of course, their power play will be in trouble if he bolts…kind of a toss up.
Their PP sucked this year anyway. And he played 62 games, so its not like he missed most of the season.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
True. But I seem to recall it REALLY sucked when he was out – we’re talking Caps vs. Montreal in round 1 sucking.
…too soon?
Something like 6% without Gonch, 19% with Gonch.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah he had 30 pts on the PP.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
I know, I’m more making a snark against those guys. He’s likely not to be worth the cap it he’ll create.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah. Snark-o-meter is on the fritz today, sorry :P
But no, he’s probably not worth what he’ll get. And hey, more power to him for going out and trying to get that big fat contract – like Huet 2 years ago, when is the next time someone like Hamhuis will be able to command top dollar as the best thing available? Capitalism, baby.
I’d love that too, but when the guy makes unreasonable demands from Philly and a lot of hockey folks keep saying he’s going to take a discount to play for home-town Vancouver (who want another D and and whose GM made some cryptic “we’re not finished yet” comments about his D corps), there’s too much smoke there. I can’t see him signing with Pitt unless Shero loses his mind. Hamhuis to VAN seems like a mortal lock.
I didn’t hear he made unreasonable demands from Philly. I heard he just wasn’t willing to negotiate with them.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Hating Philly though I do, refusing to negotiate with a team that just traded for your rights strikes me as a little unreasonable (though I heard he was asking for $5m/year – can’t remember where, but nothing super reliable – which is what I meant in my comment). I can see it if he just wants to be a FA and see what happens, but if you’re not even picking up the phone that suggests you have a destination in mind and Philly’s not it.
well, that’s his right. it’s really no different if he had played for Philly all year and decided it’s not a team he wants to return to.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
From what I heard at the Draft re: Hamhuis (check me out – big insider), Hamhuis is much more about his role than the dollars and that’s why Philly was a no-go – they wanted him to be a third-pairing guy and he wants more minutes. Of course, that might make it ultimately about the dollars – in a bigger role, his next contract can be bigger – but it doesn’t seem to be his primary motivation at present, and lends credence to the Hamhuis-to-VAN thinking.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Interesting, thanks JP. It’s amazing that with the salary cap trouble Philly’s already in that they would be making that kind of offer to a guy to be a 3rd pair D. The Pittsburgh situation ought to test this theory out – you’d think he’d at least be a top 4 D on the Pens, whether or not they keep Gonchar.
If I’m Hamhuis, and the Canucks are willing to make a competitive offer and give some kind of NTC to let me play in my hometown, that’s a no-brainer. At least when the town in question is Vancouver.
Philly continues to amaze me in so many ways. They really need a goalie, but to go after Nabokov – who despite his flaws will probably turn out to be the best of the UFA crop and therefore the most expensive – is bizarre. If they manage to get him it won’t be cheap, and they for sure will have to move salary.
They could easily get any number of goalies cheaper who would at least be an upgrade over Leighton. Just wonder what Holmgren is smoking these days…not that I mind, of course.
They apparently contacted Turco. At least, front page of BSH says, linking to Hradek.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Fantastic.
Hoping they don’t try to go after Theodore.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Interesting stuff JP.
From what I’ve heard (not nearly as connected, I’m sure) it does sound like Pittsburgh is almost trying to “recruit” Hamhuis. Shero’s talked to him and they’re going to have Bylsma talk to the player too — with the agent’s blessing — to kind of show him some love on how the Pens would have him slotted, give him details about what the team would do for him (Shero’s hinted at untapped offensive potential) and all that good stuff.
We’ll see if it works, it’d be a major coup to get him to sign before testing the July 1 waters.
My question is how is Pitt going to afford him. Currently, Pitt has 12.5 Million in Cap space and currently have the following signed: 11 forwards, 3 defensemen, and 2 goalies. At the minimum, they need to sign 1 more forward and 3 more defensemen. I’m also assuming they’d sign up 1 spare forward and 1 spare defenseman.
The free agent forwards include Ponikorovsky, Fedetenko, and Geurin. Note: that trio was primarily folks on our top 2 lines, so I would assume the “spare” forward would be one of the guys already under contract and, so they would sign 2 of the UFA’s at 2 Million apiece so that’s 4 million, even with no raise or just a token raise which leaves 8,8 million to sign the defensemen.
Let’s assume Gonchar does not resign so that’s 5 M eliminated. The incumbent FA’s are Eaton at 2 M and Leopold at 1.75. I would assume we sign up Eaton for at least 2 M and Leopold gets a raise, probably making 2 M. So that’s 4 more Million in salary. Mc Kee, the probable “spare”, currently makes .8 M and would command about the same, I’m guessing. Hence, there is exactly 4 Million left for Hamhuis. Essentially, they could afford him but only if no one gets a raise except Leopold and also if you only sign 2 out of 3 FA forwards and do not sign Gonchar.
I’m making the assumption that 4 Million is Hamhuis’s price.
Rocking the Red since 1975
The thing about the Penguins, however, is they show no worries about picking up guys on waivers, even after training camp to fill holes. They did it last year with Bourque and the defenseman (Bergeron?).
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
Yeah they already have Ballard, Bieksa, Salo, Edler, Ehrhoff, Alberts and Rome under contract. Not to mention O’Brien (who’s restricted) and Mitchell (who isn’t)
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
There have been rumors of Bieksa being on the block. Though I can’t remember where in the media I saw that.
I'm gonna pain you dearly Woodhouse, when I peel all your skin off with a flensing knife, sew it into Woodhouse pajamas, and then set those pajamas on fire.
by Steckel Me Elmo on Jun 28, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
On the JRR podcast Sat, Tarik said (in very convincing terms) that the Caps weren’t interested in AV at all.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
Yeah, I was pretty surprised by that. I was also pretty surprised when he said that if the Caps were going to trade one of their young goalies, they’d trade Neuvirth before Varlamov or Holtby.
"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"
"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."
Which upset me. I’m maintaining Neuvirth will have the best career between him and Varlamov, and Holtby is unknown to me yet. I don’t know why you’re saying that anyway at this point, since Varlamov and Neuvirth are both comparables at this point, and Varlamov is likely to fetch more in return. Can’t remember if it was OTB or Habs Eyes on the Prize who went and explained why to trade Halak and keep Price, but it put things to me in perspective for a future situation we may be in.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Tarik works hard, and I’m glad he’s our beat writer, but I don’t think he’s a very good judge of hockey talent.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I took that more as his opinion than any hard evidence.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
He also said in the org there was some question to Neuvrith’s work habits and attitude.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I took it as opinion, but I also took it as his opinion based off of what people in the organization are saying.
"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"
"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."
I think he also said management was “in love” with Varlamov.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I think by “management” he means Boudreau. I suspect McPhee has a much more balanced view.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought Bruce didn’t mess with the goalies?
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
quick, someone tell ’Zilla!
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
If he played any other position, I’d agree (regarding attitude). He’s come out and said “This guy gets press, but I’m better.” He’s maybe cocky, but he’s backing it up, and goalie attitudes never scare me, because they’re all fucking nuts.
"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."
by Whiter Mage on Jun 28, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
It’s hard to imagine a guy who, after a great win, said “It’s Theo’s streak, I’m just here to help” has a bad attitude.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
by bagace on Jun 28, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
and he didn’t make a peep about the crappy situation he was in last season, getting yanked around and wondering where they heck he was going to be playing to next day.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Well, Bruce himself openly questioned Varly’s preparation in his return from injury this season, so there’s that.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I was really bored last night and read a bunch of stuff in the archives at Alex Ovetjkin. Tretiak was talking about Varly after his first start in 2008:
Simeon’s work attitude (and I saw him training in Yaroslavl) reminds me of Artur Irbe, who was 50% self-made goalie. I have flown to Irbe in San Jose to help him. He used to come to training earlier than any other team player, worked independently for an hour off the ice. He worked out like crazy. That’s why he was able to carry Carolina to the Stanley Cup finals. If at that time he wouldn’t have family problems I am confident that his team would win. Varlamov is from the same breed as Irbe. I was fortunate to get to know Hasek and Brodeur, even when they train, they wouldn’t allow more than 6-7 goals in hourly training. You can say anything about the statistics, but in this case it says a lot since those goalkeepers allow only one or two goals per game.
The rest of the article is interesting, it talks about how Varly was rough but then started working with the Finnish goalie coach and improved his skills a lot. Sounds like Varly is a very hard worker. He is always hard on himself in interviews so you can tell he expects a lot from himself. Not really sure what happened to Varly after returning from injury, but Bruce thought he wasn’t ready. But in general I think they are pleased with Varly’s work ethic. Perhaps Varly not being ready wasn’t due to him not working hard enough. Maybe he needed to play some more games in Hershey after being out a few months. Perhaps he wasn’t handled correctly.
by vtcapsfan99 on Jun 28, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I think there were a few screw ups in the “handling the goalie” situation during that time frame. It would have been less likely to happen if not for the Olympics.
I personally think Varly needed another start in Hershey before being returned. Even after being brought up then, he was returned to action sooner than expected since Neuvy himself had gotten injured.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Was just going to point that out. Tarik seemed really, really sure that he wasn’t going to be coming here.
Kinda glad…I think someone’s going to pay him a stupid amount of money, and i’m glad its not going to be DC.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
… which is followed by a half-hour with a cripplingly hungover me.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I told you off the top you sounded like you didn’t want to be there. :)
by freakinandpeakin on Jun 28, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Look, I’m probably Mr. “Don’t Listen To Anything McPhee Says” around here, but even I believe him when he says the Caps aren’t making an offer on Volchenkov. It just doesn’t make any sense.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
He certainly couldn’t say he was interested because it would have been considered tampering, but usually he’d say something like he’s not discussing FA in the press. So I’m inclined to believe him, but then again, there is that whole poker issue to deal with.
"It's always good to have vikings."
Pretty sure I read/heard somewhere that GMGM said he personally called the Ottawa GM and told him he wasn’t interested—he probably felt the need to call because of all the speculation going on.
I know this has been posted before (I just forgot how emphatic GMGM was, though OTOH he’s a lying liar), but it certainly sounds here that, if anything, he’s thinking offense for FA.
Parsing George
and we have made it clear, that we are not going to make an offer there. It was in some reports and on the wire a month ago that we have denied and I have talked to the manager and told him we are not making any offers, so I don’t know where that came from but it is not true.
GMGM could have meant that the Caps were not going to make an offer to the Sens to get exclusive negotiation rights (a la Hamhuis). It would seem extraordinary to bother to contact Bryan Murray re: Volch for any other reason at that particular point in time.
More norrissey, less morrissey
by bigonetimer on Jun 28, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
he must have been talking about an offer for his rights as there would be no reason for him to talk w/ the ottawa GM about aquiring him after July 1 since the ottawa GM would not have anything to do with those negotiations. either that or by “manager” he’s talking about volchenkov’s agent….again, doubtful as i think that would be considered tampering to talk w/ his agent w/out ottawa’s permission.
i do believe it when i hear that the caps would have no offer for volchenkov, but that’s at an assumed price/term he would probably get in the open market. if he would accept a $3M/year offer then the caps (or most any other team) would jump on that in a heartbeat.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
That seems right, but it’s hard to know. I guess what I was getting at when starting this thread is that it seems like the Caps can/should make some a low-ball offer in terms of dollars or years and see how much (if any) appeal playing with 3 Russians has for Volchenkov. GMGM explicitly endorsed that tactic when it comes to getting Russian draftees over here. We haven’t really seen it play out in FA yet (and it may never – it’s a different animal than trying to get some teenagers comfortable with making a trans-Atlantic move).
It’s completely different because AV has already proven he wants to play in the NHL and that he can do it. If he doesn’t get the money he wants maybe he goes to the KHL, but it’s much less of a risk, especially as a UFA. If you can get him to sign, he plays for you. That’s not necessarily the case with a draftee.
I waited all year for this?
Love Sam Carrier's Lewiston Maineiacs Sweater.

The torn stick tape, the missing tooth…fantastic.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
I hear that when the Maineiacs party, they’re dancing like they never danced before.
Look at this signature line. Notice the lack of spelling errors and self-whoring?
by Bald Pollack on Jun 28, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions
A member of the Maineiacs (supposedly) tried to pick up a friend of mine freshman year. She had no idea who the Maineiacs were before I told her.
I will have to try and make it to some games to scout Carrier.
I'm gonna pain you dearly Woodhouse, when I peel all your skin off with a flensing knife, sew it into Woodhouse pajamas, and then set those pajamas on fire.
by Steckel Me Elmo on Jun 28, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
JT Bourne has a really interesting article about free agency and decisions to be made, from a player’s perspective.
Tweet from Bob M.
Waivers, likely for buyout purposes: Cheechoo, Ott; Nokelainen, Vandermeer, Phx; Koistinen, Fla; Kotalik, Cgy.
I thought Kotalik had promise with the Sabres, and now he’s being bought out?
Huge flame out for Cheechoo after that one year in SJ, if my memory serves me right.
Every bursted bubble has a glory! Each abysmal failure makes a point! Every glowing path that goes astray,shows you how to find a better way. So every time you stumble never grumble. Next time you'll bumble even less!
I got all excited when I saw Ott, ‘til I realized it was an abbreviation for Cheech’s team and not the player.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Kotalik was godawful in NYR. I think they threw him in to make the cap numbers work in the Jokinen deal.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
You are exactly right. It shows you how systems and line mates can make a huge difference.
Every bursted bubble has a glory! Each abysmal failure makes a point! Every glowing path that goes astray,shows you how to find a better way. So every time you stumble never grumble. Next time you'll bumble even less!
He’s still owed 3 million each of the next two years, (with a no trade clause!!!)
All for a guy who dropped a sweet 11/16/27 -18 in 71 games last year and 20/23/43 -5 in 75 games before that.
Here’s an interesting fact…Ales Kotalik has never finished with a positive +/- in his entire career. He’s -39 lifetime.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
College players and the draft
OK, I apologize for (a) asking what is probably a question that has already been asked here a few times over the last few days and (b) not taking the time to search any harder than I already have for the answer…but here goes…
How are NHL teams allowed to draft players that are still in college or planning to attend? I know the NCAA has very strict rules about players accepting any kind of professional contract, compensation or even endorsement deals, so I’ve never been sure exactly how this works. I know that in other sports, players who go into the draft lose NCAA eligibility.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 12:59 PM EDT reply actions
the college guys are drafted meaning the team gets their rights. they arent necessarily signed to a contract right away which preserves their NCAA eligbility. if i recall, it does impact thier ability to participate in summer camps as they would have to pay their own way. teams have a certain period of time to sign these guys or relinquish their rights.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
as long as you have not signed with an agent, you’re still technically an amateur according to the NCAA (well, assuming of course you meet all their other requirements). When the NHL drafts you, they retain your rights for a certain number of years, unlike, say, baseball.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Right, but that doesn’t explain the NBA and NFL. If you declare for the draft you are ineligible for NCAA no matter what happens, even if you aren’t drafted.
I waited all year for this?
different animals. nba and nfl have different eligiblity rules for the draft. nhl i believe you need to be 18. nba you need to be one year past your high school graduation or something like that. also, in the nba and nfl, once you are drafted you are no longer NCAA eligible.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Jun 28, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Right, that’s my point and your distinction is irrelevant. It doesn’t matter how old you have to be for the NBA or NFL. The NCAA says “if you don’t take money, you are eligible” for baseball and hockey. But in football and basketball you can not take money and be ineligible simply by declaring for the draft.
I waited all year for this?
it’s the NCAA. best not to try and make sense of their rules.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Money sports versus non-revenue sports. Probably in cahoots with the leagues.
"It's always good to have vikings."
I believe the key word is “declaring”. In football and basketball you declare for the draft; in the NHL and in baseball you don’t, you’re just draft eligible. By declaring you’re essentially saying “I’m a professional now”. In hockey you’re just eligible at a certain point; in baseball there are three different points you’re eligible, and it isn’t up to the player.
That also makes sense…but then you have whole “chicken and egg” scenario, where basketball and football players need to be required to “declare” because the act of being drafted robs them of their eligibility.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think so. If a guy were picked and it were out of his control, I can’t imagine the NCAA would declare him ineligible – which is why baseball and hockey draftees can still play.
Your point makes sense, but the NCAA is so nefarious it’s a little hard to believe they have the good intentions when the top two revenue producing sports have different rules than everyone else.
by Hooks Orpik on Jun 28, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe it’s the pro leagues who require players to declare whether or not they’re going to be drafted. If that’s the case, it’s the leagues themselves that are creating the different standards, not the NCAA.
And, frankly, I’m not sold on the “NCAA is the root of evil thing”. I’m not saying that it’s a model organization by any stretch, but “the NCAA is horrible and corrupt” seems like it’s one of those “everyone knows that!” things, like “Sidney Crosby only has so many points because of all his secondary assists”, “The Capitals don’t play defense”, or “Hockey in the Sun Belt is a bad idea.”
Its not an “everyone knows that!” thing when its actually true. They’re an organization that claims this high moral ground to be all about how great their student athletes are, but constantly does things like increase the number of teams in the basketball tournament (in order to get more BCS conference teams in it), and lately with the football conference realignment that pretty much say its an organization that doesn’t care about anything but making money for its member schools. Not only that, but they make BILLIONS of dollars off these students names, likenesses, and abilities, but will hit a school with sanctions if someone buys them effing LUNCH.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
And that’s not even bringing up their outright collusion with the NFL and NBA in serving as a de facto minors system for both leagues.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s the kind of thing I mean, though. What’s the collusion? How are they de facto minor leagues and, if so, what’s wrong with that?
Again, it may just be ignorance on my part, so if I’m mistaken, please help me understand.
Kinda explained above about the whole “mutually beneficial” agreements they all have in terms of keeping the draft ages high. Not only that, but the NFL doesn’t play on Saturdays because of College Football.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I guess I don’t see the problem. Yes, it’s mutually beneficial, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong, does it?
Only in the sense of this sort of “fake morality” the NCAA cloaks itself in. Its disingenuous at best, and borderline criminal at worst.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
my problem with it is it means going to NCAA route is the only option. If you want to play professional basketball or football, you have to go to the NCAA. No other options exist. And while you’re in the NCAA, you can’t earn any money with your athletic talent, while the NCAA can potentially be raking in cash because of you.
In the mean time, the NBA and NFL don’t have in invest in minor leagues or other developmental leagues. The NCAA does all the hard work (and makes a boatload of money while doing it) and the professional leagues reap the rewards.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Well now the European basketball leagues are starting to look like an option.
I waited all year for this?
If I were a top prospect now, that’s where I’d go.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
No question. Tons of life experience, making actual money, women that aren’t college chicks. Beautiful.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Tons of life experience, making actual money, women that aren’t college chicks.
My guess is that those last two would result in more life experiences than you bargained for ;)
Sure beats the frat house ;)
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I disagree. You can have an "everyone knows that!" situation even when something’s true. Look at the Blackhawks and the Flyers – everyone knew the weaknesses of the respective teams were in net, but a lot of people just repeated those facts ad nauseum and wrote the teams off rather than discussing the team’s overall strengths and weaknesses and whether they could be overcome. You could say the same thing about the Capitals and how the knee-jerk analysis was to question their goaltending and defense.
I fail to see the issue with the football conference realignment – though I really know very little. If the teams want to realign, what’s the NCAA’s role?
it’s in the NCAA’s interest to have the Pac-10 and Big 10 expand to 12 teams. Now both of those conference have championship football game. think of all the extra money.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Not only that, but the Big 10 made 66 million dollars in profits last year on top of 60 million in rights fees for the Big 10 Network. That’s an awful lot of scratch.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t disagree, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re the driving force behind it or that they’re doing anything wrong.
It becomes wrong when they try to claim they’re an organization that cares so much about the “student” in student-athlete when its clear they’re just all about money. You can’t claim that moral high ground and then take actions that not only shut out smaller schools, but squeeze even more resources out of your students.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
They get 3 or 4 huge “megaconferences” and then they can decide that a playoff is a good idea instead of trying to keep selling people the Bowl Championship Series (even going to the lengths of creating twitter accounts and webpages in order to sell the system’s merits).
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe it’s the pro leagues who require players to declare whether or not they’re going to be drafted. If that’s the case, it’s the leagues themselves that are creating the different standards, not the NCAA.
I could be off-base, but I guess my assumption was that the NFL and NBA sat down and worked out agreements with the NCAA. Wasn’t this the case during the recent rule change banning straight from HS to pros in basketball? I’m sure the NCAA puts the screws to the leagues to keep players around for as long as they can — and there’s nothing necessarily wrong with that, as it gives kids a chance to mature and also get post-HS education opportunities they otherwise wouldn’t take.
I’m by no means an eligibility expert, but it’s just a little too convenient to me that the NCAA would require a 3rd year football player to declare for the NFL (and forfeit college eligibility) where as they don’t mind say, NCAA hockey players have their professional rights claimed by an NHL team at any point during or before their NCAA hockey career.
Its mutually beneficial for both leagues. The NBA and NFL avoid having high profile kids come into the league and going batshit crazy (like Leon Smith), the NCAA gets to keep continuity in its teams and build stars, and it also helps the Unions because it keeps the kids out of the league and not taking the jobs of older guys.
Its still pretty messed up for a kid who’s family is eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches that he can’t provide for them by going pro and making money.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
as it gives kids a chance to mature and also get post-HS education opportunities they otherwise wouldn’t take.
one-and-dones don’t exactly go to class. I despise that rule.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
This probably isn’t the right point to interject this question, but how does this line of argument relate to the “No CHL kids in the AHL rule” that the NHL/AHL have agreed to?
I waited all year for this?
I still don’t get why the CHL has one set of rules, but every other feeder system has another.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Jun 28, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Its something that’s mutually beneficial for all parties involved, which I guess is enough these days.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
because the CHL thinks they’re special?
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Well, first off, they are special. The CHL is far and away the best junior league in the world. The other leagues are true pro-leagues so saying you can’t go from the SEL to the AHL makes marginally less sense than the CHL rule. At the end of the day, though, it’s all about leverage for the CHL. What would happen if the NFL tried to start a minor league football league that would compete with NCAA football? It would get shot down immediately.
I waited all year for this?
Doesn’t the CHL pretty much run itself as a de facto professional league? I know they have education programs, but the players don’t have to attend, correct? And they get their college paid for if they so wish?
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
It is a professional league, despite what anyone says. They all get stipends and anyone signed to an NHL contract gets substantially more. They have an education program but once you’ve crossed a time-served/money-earned threshold you lose your eligibility to it.
I waited all year for this?
That was one thing that always stuck out for me about Sean Avery in that interview he had with George Stromboloupolopolopolpolous where he talked about how he never really got to go to school and get an education. That struck me as very sad.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I have no ability to show any sympathy for Avery. Aside from being a total douche, he has all the money he’ll ever need if he wants to pursue an education. Maybe he could have taken summer classes instead of an internship for a fashion magazine.
I waited all year for this?
Amen. Even Ricky got his Grade 10. /obscure reference
But seriously, the way some of these guys essentially get their education in hockey and nothing else is perhaps troubling. I won’t go further than perhaps because this is a widespread phenomenon outside of junior hockey, but it does make you wonder.
I think I’m actually massively confused about this, so let me just boil my comment down to this: I would hope that a player in a junior league would have the opportunity, if they want to, to pursue a high school-level education and still play. So I’m referring to the 16 year-old Avery entering the OHL – I think his education shouldn’t halt there if he doesn’t want it to. Having said that, I assume it is possible to keep getting an education, so my comments were more or less just flotsam.
I also know that baseball players are no longer eligible once they sign a professional contract (which is really what it’s all about). NBA and NFL players are expected to be available to play for their parent club immediately, so they are in that sense different from baseball and/or hockey players.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
right, but you can also be drafted, not sign, and go back into the draft the following year with baseball.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Right, well based on replies below, it would appear that drafting teams maintain rights until that player exits the NCAA, which would make sense.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought you could declare, but as long as you hadn’t signed with an agent, you could back out prior to the draft and remain NCAA clear.
maybe it has to do with the way the NFL and NBA use colleges as minor leagues? You can’t enter those drafts until you been out of high school, and let’s be honest that means playing at an NCAA program 99% of the time, for a certain number of years. MLB and NHL can both draft kids still in high school.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
I think you lose eligibility when you declare but you may be right about the agent distinction. I’m pretty sure I remember an NCAA basketball player declaring but not signing an agent and still losing eligibility.
I waited all year for this?
I thought Vasquez at Maryland declared for the NBA draft last year and then backed out to spend his senior year at Maryland, but maybe he didn’t formally declare (I assume there’s paperwork and whatnot)
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
He didn’t hire an agent. Once you hire an agent your eligibility is gone.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
but he did declare, right?
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Yes. You can declare and not hire an agent and still go back, at least in basketball.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
They work out for teams, to get a sense of where (if at all) they’ll be picked, and they usually will advise them to go back to school if it looks like they aren’t going to be picked very high.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
do teams cover the expenses of these draft-hopefuls to come work out with them? That alone would probably cost you NCAA eligibility.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
I would think not since that would constitute one of them there “illegal benefits”
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
NCAA kids going to rookie camp pay their own way.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
It would. Related, when the Caps have Development Camp, any of their NCAA prospects have to pay their own travel, hotels, etc., whereas the other guys don’t.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Yup. That’s why pretty much every school has an “NCAA Compliance Officer” of some sort to make sure the athletes are aware of that stuff.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Once – if you’ve withdrawn from a prior Draft and then declare, you can’t withdraw again, your eligibility is simply gone.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
There have been cases, at least in terms of Mike Williams and Maurice Clarett in the NFL, of guys who declared for the draft, were found to be ineligible for the Draft, and weren’t allowed to go back to their schools.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Clarett was also found to have violated a whole slew of NCAA regulations. He also tried to declare a year early because, iirc, Ohio State was about to kick him out.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Yeah…he tried to challenge the age rule, and so did Mike Williams. Williams wasn’t allowed to return to USC, and it probably killed his football career. He missed an entire year, got drafted by the Lions, and I think ate himself out of the league.
Ohio State running back Maurice Clarett was suspended by his school following his 2002 freshman year. After being unable to gain reinstatement with Ohio State, Clarett made the decision to declare for the NFL Draft. However, since Clarett was only of true sophomore eligibility, he had to legally challenge the NFL rule that a player must be three years removed from high school to be eligible for the NFL Draft. After a court proceeding, a federal judge ruled that the NFL could not legally bar Clarett from entering the 2004 NFL Draft.
Williams, having completed his sophomore year and only two years removed from high school, made the decision to declare for the 2004 NFL Draft as well after hearing the federal judge’s ruling. Williams hired an agent and moved forward presenting himself as a legitimate first round pick (and most, if not all, NFL pundits and NFL personnel agreed that Williams was a first round choice). By declaring his intent to enter the draft, hiring an agent to represent his interests, and filing the NFL paperwork necessary to enter the draft, he made himself ineligible for NCAA reinstatement.
Still prior to the 2004 NFL Draft, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, overturned the Federal Judge’s decision allowing Clarett to enter the Draft. Additionally, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a final appeal. Clarett and Williams were ineligible for the 2004 NFL Draft.
As Williams was ineligible for NCAA reinstatement, he was required to sit the entire 2004 football season and was not allowed to practice with USC as well.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I wrote a sweet paper in law school about Clarett, eligibility and related issues.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Both things are really tragedies. The NCAA is one of the most corrupt organizations on the entire earth.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Jun 28, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
NCAA, IOC, and FIFA are quite the trifecta.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
But nowhere near FIFA
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
If you declare for the draft you are ineligible for NCAA no matter what happens, even if you aren’t drafted.
I could have sworn you could declare for the draft, but still remain elligible as long as you didn’t sign with an agent.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Jun 28, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
never mind, didn’t realize how much further this discussion went.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Jun 28, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Contract != draft, maintaining rights until the guy exits.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the replies, I do realize that being drafted and signing a contract are 2 different things, but doesn’t the drafting team only have a limited amount of time to get that player under contract? I assumed it was a year, but I could be wrong. If that were the case, it would make it hard to get a guy under contract who is still planning on playing NCAA hockey.
Regardless, I trust GMs and such know what they’re doing when they draft these guys and not just throwing picks away (or at least trying not to), but I just didn’t know how it worked with the NCAA rules.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s generally 2 years to get the guy under contract, but for Russians it is indefinite because of the lack of transfer agreement and for NCAA players you have until they graduate.
I waited all year for this?
That really gives NHL GMs a LOT more to work with when it comes to taking chances on younger players, compared to other pro leagues! (they don’t have to worry about wasting a draft pick on a guy that will elect to stay in college). Thanks for the clarification.
"I am ready for his provocations"
by PaintDrinkingPete on Jun 28, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Per Hradek, Flyers also tried to contact Marty Turco. There’s a story up on the front page of BSH.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
There is a reason that most players who become unrestricted free agents end up leaving the Rangers every year; Slats does not have the advantage, he isn’t willing to pay the bucks, so the player takes off and gets that money elsewhere.
Yeah… Sather won’t spend money. Haha. Maybe the UFAs leave because he’s already spent the money on other outside UFAs and can’t afford his homegrown players. But sure, convince yourself otherwise.
For the record, I’d be in total favor of acquiring Staal for the right price.
I waited all year for this?
For the record, I’d be in total favor of acquiring Staal for the right price.
Ditto. Forget Hamhuis and Volchenkov, M. Staal’s going to be very good for a very long time.
What was that stat in the hilarious Pronger Norris snub thread, that the only guy with a qualcomp above .100 and a lower GAOn/60 than Pronger was Marc Staal?
Wow.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 28, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
he’s the only Staal brother I approve of.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
For the record, I’d be in total favor of acquiring Staal for the right price.
I agree, but I also think in this hypothetical he would have to REPLACE one of Green, Schultz, Alzner, or Carlson; not be ADDED to that list. I don’t want a blue-line of entirely under-25 players and Poti. Gotta have some legit experience IMO.
I’m sensitive to the experience, but I’d rather have a quality player. While those guys are almost all young, Green, Schultz, and Staal have a lot more games and experience than their age would tend to suggest. The problem is I don’t know how you re-sign the 4 homegrown boys if you commit to Staal.
I waited all year for this?
Caps Qualify Nine
Kindly discuss the news here.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Ken Campbell writes that Donald Fehr will be interim NHLPA executive director through the negotiations for the next collective bargaining contract.
very very interesting. bears watching.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
It’s a good thing. Incompetence was their biggest problem. At least that guy knows how these things go
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I think so, too. No one is eager for another stoppage, and Fehr is accomplished at getting favorable CBAs.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
its not a good thing if his presence leads to another labor dispute
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Jun 28, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Tales from the Draft Floor (Earl Sleek, Battle of California)
Short version: apparently JP is pretty cool, systems are a bit funny
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
hilarious read, and I’m only up to accidentally crashing the PHWA meeting.
I won’t go through what was discussed or who I saw there — it certainly wasn’t my business to be in the room, but there were a lot of “fucks” thrown around in that conversation, and I can’t help giggling every time and whispering over to Connie, “How unprofessional!”
fabulous.
#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
2010-11 WASHINGTON CAPITALS
CAPGEEK.COM CAP CALCULATOR
FORWARDS
Alexander Ovechkin ($9.538m) / Nicklas Backstrom ($6.700m) / Mike Knuble ($2.800m)
Alexander Semin ($6.000m) / * Patrice Bergeron ($4.750m) / * Eric Fehr ($1.400m)
Brooks Laich ($2.067m) / Mathieu Perreault ($0.717m) / * Owen Nolan ($2.000m)
Jason Chimera ($1.875m) / Dave Steckel ($1.100m) / Matt Bradley ($1.000m)
* Boyd Gordon ($0.850m)
DEFENSEMEN
Karl Alzner ($1.675m) / Mike Green ($5.250m)
* Jeff Schultz ($1.850m) / Tom Poti ($3.500m)
* Sean O\’Donnell ($2.000m) / John Carlson ($0.817m)
John Erskine ($1.250m) / Tyler Sloan ($0.700m)
GOALTENDERS
Michal Neuvirth ($0.822m) / Simeon Varlamov ($0.822m)
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS
(these totals are compiled using the bonus cushion)
ROSTER: 23; CAP:$59.4m; PAYROLL: $59.482m; CAP ROOM: $0.768m BONUSES: $0.850m
Capgeek — more satisfying than working…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 28, 2010 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
What do you think Willie Mitchell goes for?
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
And here I was looking at salary instead of cap hit for Bergeron; I’d been throwing around the 5.75 number.
That’s going to make him even harder to get in trade with BOS, assuming he’s available at all. We’d probably have to eat significant salary, or give up a bluechip prospect/picks.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 28, 2010 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions










![Via Traktor Chelyabinsk's website, here's Evgeny Kuznetsov graciously accepting a handmade hat from some of his fans.
The Traktor fans were aware of the NA tradition of the hat trick,and in honor of his strong performance at World Juniors, they made him one of his very own:
"It is known that the ocean [overseas leagues - ed.] has a tradition: after the execution of a hat-trick fans throw on the ice caps. Hat-trick in a literal translation - "hat trick". Kuznetsov played in the World Cup just two such trick: in the group stage, he scored 3 goals in the gate the Latvian team, and in the semi-finals three times, struck the gate of Canada. These two points are noted."
More awesome pix at the link.](http://cdn3.sbnation.com/fan_shot_images/235874/kuzya20130112_small.jpg)































