Caps Prospects From A Fantasy Perspective
As Draft week is upon us, all eyes are on this year's crop of young men and guessing at their respective impacts in the NHL. At DobberHockey, predicting such things is always the focus, and my good friends over there have churned out yet another must-read for fantasy and non-fantasy puck-heads alike, their "Fantasy Prospects Report 2010." Here's a sampling of what's in this year's edition (click any of the blurbs to enlarge):
There are paragraphs on other Caps prospects as well (Francois Bouchard, Dmitri Kugryshev, Anton Gustafsson, Christopher Bourque, Karl Alzner and Michal Neuvirth), similar write-ups for the other 29 NHL teams, mock drafts and much more. Buy it, read it, get smart.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I love Matt, but 85+ point potential? I’d lean more towards a solid 25-35-50+ guy. And comparing Carlson to anything related to McCabe is offensive…
Potential? Absolutely. He’s got the tools.
Will he get that next year? Doubtful.
by DrinkingPartner on Jun 21, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Keep in mind, upside is whatever Dobber thinks is his likely ability +20%, representing a season in which everything breaks right. I don’t think there’s any question that scoring > 1 point-per-game in a season would constitute a career season for Matty, one I don’t think he’ll reach. Maybe if Backs gets injured (knock on wood) and Matty spends significant time as the 1C and on the half-wall of the first unit. Even then, we’d expect a pretty high PDO for an 85 point season.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 21, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m scratching my head more at the 70 PIM estimate. If he gets that many, he has no chance of being an 85-point player (not that I think he’ll ever reach that number). He’s not physical enough to get many five-minute chunks out of that, so he’d being doing a lot of stoopid stuff to get there. By way of comparison, only one Cap topped 70 PIMs this year — Ovechkin. Only three non-enforcers topped it in the previous year — Ovechkin, Semin, and Morrisonn.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Jun 21, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
People who want quality information on players about whom they might not know a ton.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
See KHtaD above:
upside is whatever Dobber thinks is his likely ability +20%, representing a season in which everything breaks right.
In other words, it’s not a guy’s likely peak, it’s the perfect storm season, unlikely to even happen, but if everything comes together…
Basically, it’s a Rink Wrap 10 – the best season you could possibly imagine the guy having.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Oh, so basically what Alex Semin did last year?
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 21, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Holtby
In the Japer’s Rink fantasy draft tournament almost everyone was pretty down on Holtby, yet his AHL numbers were outstanding, and Dobber certainly likes his chances. Why are the rink rats and rabbits so down on him? Inexperience? I’ve never seen him play, so I don’t have a strong opinion.
by RPI93 on Jun 21, 2010 1:43 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I’ve seen Holtby a few times in Hershey, both when he’s been good and when he hasn’t. I think he’s going to make for some tough decisions in a year or two with respect to goaltending. I do not think he has quite the spectacular athleticism of a Varlamov of the technical detail of a Neuvirth. He doesn’t seem the sort one can pigeon-hole into a style. In that respect he resembles a Martin Brodeur, although he does not have the upside of that fellow. He’s a battler and seems capable of shouldering a big workload. Does he have the upside of a Varlamov or a Neuvirth? I’m not sure, but I don’t think he can be discounted out of hand as the third horse in a three horse race, either.
If you've read this far...seek help.
I don’t think anyone was down on Holtby’s potential at all (quite the contrary – I’m rather high on him personally), but it was a draft for a hypothetical tourney starting tomorrow, and there’s no question he’s the fourth-best/fourth-most-NHL-ready G in the system (counting Jose).
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
He was the last pick because the other three teams could not, by rule, pick him. The rules said you could only take one goalie, and the other three teams already had one.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Jun 21, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
That too. Point being, I certainly wouldn’t take anything from where he was drafted as indicating our opinions on him.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Some players have an indefinable “it” factor. Carlson is not likely to be the offensive player — ever — that Green is right now, but he could be a reliable 50-point a year player (a total Green already has surpassed three times). Carlson is right now, however, probably a better defender than Green. That “it” factor Carlson seems to possess has been reflected in a fine sense of timing, of stepping up at crucial moments — the game winner in the world juniors, his cool decision making that led to the late game-tying goal in Game 2 against Montreal.
Green might end up (would seem likely to end up, frankly) with the gaudier numbers over time, but Carlson seems more likely to be the sort of playoff horse one needs to ride to a title.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Jun 21, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Carlson scored the game-winner with 3 minutes left in the Calder Cup finals Game 4 just the other day
Consistency is the key. I’d rather have a rock like Carlson on the blueline who can contribute everywhere on the ice, than someone like Green who can catch fire and score 5 goals in 5 games, but completely disappear when needed most.
Carlson just seems to live for the moment and can really step up his game when needed. I love the fact that we have both Carlson and Green ob our blueline, but I see Carlson as out #1 stud for years to come.
Pressure situations seem to bring out the best in Carlson, while they’ve made Green crumple like a soda can. The sample size is small, but I’m concerned that Green just might be one of those players who cant raise his performance or even play at the same level under playoff pressure. That’s opposite of the way I feel about Carlson although again, sample size is small.
by Direction 87 on Jun 21, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
From Andrew Gordon’s latest blog post:
As my last quote, I only have to go back a couple months to the Olympics in Vancouver. After Canada won the gold medal game in overtime, one of the NBC announcers had this to say, and after going through this season in Hershey, I completely agree with him.
"In sports, one of the hardest things to do is win when you are supposed to."









































