Reinvention of Ovechkin?
In his recent, and excellent, article (translated here), Slava Malamud over at Sport-Express asks:
"So the question now, it seems, is whether the 2009/2010 season was a turning point for Ovechkin-has the Ovechkin we all know and love come to an end and is it time for him to reinvent himself?"
Which got me thinking: is Ovie REALLY that predicable? Does he always make the same move? Thanks to Ovechkinfans.com and NHL.com, I was able to look back at all of Alex's goals on the season. What I saw was quite interesting.
I tried to classify Ovie's goals by how they were scored (the play leading up to the goal was more important than the type of shot). I found that the 50 goals scored fit nicely into the folllowing 10 categories:
- "The Ovie" - A rush down the left side, 1-on-1 the defenseman, shot through a screen or nifty move past.
- "The PP" - Onetimer or hard shot while playing point on the Power Play
- An offensive rush not led by Ovechkin leading to a quick transition goal
- A quick shot directly off a face off win
- A play already established in the offensive zone (play in the corners, cycling, leading to a shot)
- A rebound from another player's shot (tap-ins)
- A Breakaway
- An empty-netter
- A Penalty Shot
- A puck bobbled by a defender during a break out, deep in the defensive zone
Common conception is that Alex scores most of his goals in one of the first two ways. As it turns out, ‘The Ovie' is a distant third (6 goals). This past season, Ovechkin scored 9 goals of type #2 (‘The PP') and 14 goals of type #3 (a rush led by a teammate).
This season, while Ovie attempted ‘The Ovie' plenty of times it was defended better, to the tune of only 6 goals scored. Sure, shots were still taken and thanks to an increased presence near the crease, goals were scored from the rebounds of those shots (thus, Ovechkin's career-high assist totals). But Ovie himself scored more goals when he was not the one carrying the puck up the ice. When matched up against a backchecking forward, Ovechkin has the upper hand, as opposed go going one-on-one against a defender. Having passers such as Backstrom and Semin also helps matters.
It is interesting that Ovechkin scored 24 of his 31 even-strength goals (not counting empty net or penalty shot goals) on rushes into the zone. Setting up in the zone and working for shots accounted for only 3 goals all season for Ovechkin. When Ovechkin scores, the offense appears to resemble more of a basketball fast-break; using the team's speed to create quick goals rather than fighting in the corners in hopes of finding a hole in the defense's system. These types of goals were more often scored by Backstrom or Knuble than by Ovechkin.
Ovie was better last season when he used his teammates to help set him up for scoring chances. When the Caps are trailing late in the game, or in the playoffs when the team needs a win, things change. Rather than play the game that works, a game based around numbers and team speed, the tendency is to throw the puck to the left side and let Alex try ‘The Ovie', over and over again. The Caps get desperate and look to Ovie to win games for them (and Ovie takes it on himself to do so, as well).
Is Alex a ‘One-trick Pony'? Clearly, no. His goals-per-game pace was the best in the league. But his signature move has become predictable and good defenders and shot blockers have little difficulty defending it. If Alex started carrying the puck behind the net more and created time for teammates or backed the defenseman off and stopped high along the boards more often, he'd eventually get help and decrease the number of turn-overs in the offensive zone.
If Ovechkin can expand on his already World Class ability in the offensive zone by creating time for his linemates, next season should be pretty fun to watch.
If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
22 comments
|
19 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Your report dovetails nicely with, and reaches many of the same conclusions of, Fehr and Balanced’s classic “Even Ovechkin Can Use a Cavalry.”
In my mind, we don’t really need a breakdown of the goals scored, but in which category every shot from this year fell into. It really didn’t matter how many goals he scored with the “Ovie”, it mattered how many times he tried to score with that move. That is what made him predictable.
by HateOffSeason on Jun 11, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I fully agree. If anyone has video of all 368 shots, I’ll gladly go through them all and categorize them. Half of me wonders whether our collective memories tell us he’s scored with “The Ovie” more than he actually has in his career, at least in the last few seasons.
If anyone has DVR, it might not take too long (relatively) because the game play by plays can be CTRL Fd to find the times, then you move back and forth. Certainly time consuming, but maybe a day of solid work. Or maybe I’m just missing something.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Jun 12, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Gabe Desjardins and the guys in the Oilogosphere have figured out how to scrape nhl.com for shot location and time, if you wrote a script to look for shots from Ovechkin, you could skip to the time of the game in the DVR fairly easily.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Jun 12, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Here’s the breakdown, with number of goals scored in the particluar way, with the number scored while on the PP in ( ).
1. “The Ovie” – 6 (0)
2. “The PP” – 9 (9)
3. An offensive rush not led by Ovechkin – 14 (1)
4. A quick shot directly off a face off win – 4 (1)
5. A play already established in the offensive zone – 3 (1)
6. A rebound – 2 (1)
7. A Breakaway – 5 (0)
8. An empty-netter – 5 (0)
9. A Penalty Shot – 1 (0)
10. A puck bobbled by a defender – 1 (0)
How many times did he do the Ovie with an attempted through his legs drive to the net finish? That seems like such a low percentage for success for the amount of times he tried it.
If I were Ted, I’d hire him a “moves” consultant to work with him this year and have him come back with a solid three-six options to shake up the predictability. Not sure if this job actually exists, but it sure should.
Forward this to BB
Congrats on a great project and analysis. This confirms what I had already suspected after comments by Montreal d’men about ‘The Ovie’ going stale. It also confirms my other suspicion that they need to work on cycling the puck more and working behind the cage. As difficult as it might be to confront your star player, it is on BB to articulate this to OV. Anyone have BB’s email? Because he really needs to read your post.
They also need to work on sticking to their game. Like the broadcasters noticed, when the Caps are desperate, they tend to break into individuals and not stick with it like, say, the Flyers.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Jun 12, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Well we know BB’s boss reads the Rink (including Fan Posts), so maybe he’ll pass it on.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
I think there’s a good explanation for why Ovie doesn’t score much on extended stays in the zone: Because he’s Ovie. Once things get set up and the cycle begins, the opposition usually has someone draped all over him. To his credit (and Backstrom’s/Knuble’s), he’s getting more assists by finding them. But Ovie doesn’t get “lost” by defenders in the offensive zone the same way Brett Hull used to. That said, he’s Ovie and he’s a bull. If he wants a spot on the ice, he needs to just take it…
Also forward Gordo’s Take on Game 2 of the Bears/Stars series, when he discusses the team’s loss.
Somewhere along the line, we let things slip. We played a very uncharacteristic game in my opinion. Each time we captured the momentum, we would shoot ourselves in the foot and go back to square one. Although the effort was there, it seemed like we let our emotions take control at times, and at this point in the season too much raw emotion can hurt you
and
When frustration sets in, you act differently. You become more aware of what the players around you are doing instead of what YOU are supposed to be doing. You are willing to break the game plan and skate yourself out of position in order to hit somebody. You become unwilling to take a hit, a slash, or a cross check without lashing back in retaliation. Every player has been guilty of this at some point in their careers (myself included), but the timing tonight was unfortunate. I remember doing an interview after Adirondack snapped our 24-game win streak at home about how they seemed to have success against us all year. I talked about how they played a chippy, mouthy game that got under our skin and drove us to act out of character. When we played against them, we weren’t the Bears; we became a team of 20 individuals who didn’t control our passion.
Great work and, needless to say, I agree with a lot of the conclusions. I also find this very interesting:
Setting up in the zone and working for shots accounted for only 3 goals all season for Ovechkin. When Ovechkin scores, the offense appears to resemble more of a basketball fast-break; using the team’s speed to create quick goals rather than fighting in the corners in hopes of finding a hole in the defense’s system.
This is why I don’t think the Caps are in the same category as DET and CHI (and even PIT) as “puck possession” teams. The Caps do have the puck a lot because they have so much skill, but they LOVE to score off the rush and stretch passes. They don’t make it a staple of their game to get the puck below the goal line and punish the D and establish possession, despite the fact that this is when they are their most dangerous. This is the single biggest offensive change I’d like to see going into next season.
I waited all year for this?
Too bad that freight-training an opposing defender into a goalie to score doesn’t count.. else you’d have 11 different types :)
Who was that he decked? Was it Gil?
Yes.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!
by red army line on Jun 13, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
It still haunts me that if that goal had counted and we ended up winning the game, we may never have seen Montreal make the playoffs at all.
Know Don Cherry, No Win. No Don Cherry, Know Win.
by M-M-M-My Chimera on Jun 14, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
It was Hal Gill, and the media commented on it that the most astonishing thing was not that it was waved off, but that someone as big as Gill could be sent flying like that…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 28, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions
































