2009-10 Rink Wrap: Nicklas Backstrom
From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up, Nicklas Backstrom.
Key Stat: Backstrom finished fourth in the NHL in scoring.
Interesting Stat: Backstrom led the NHL in road scoring in 2009-10.
The Good: Backstrom just keeps getting better, improving upon his 2008-09 totals in goals, assists, plus-minus, shots on goal, shooting percentage, face-off percentage and time on ice. This past season he became just the fourth player to have a 33-goal/68-assist season in the NHL since 1996-97, and he still hasn't missed a game since coming into the League. He was fourth overall in power-play points (37), even-strength points (64), plus-minus (+37) and three-plus-point games (13, including a pair of five-point efforts), and was the fourth-most valuable skater in the League (by GVT). Though he only won 49.9% of his face-offs overall, that number spiked to 57.6% on the power play, which helped Backstrom to rack up the most points- and primary-assists-per-sixty-minutes at 5-on-4 in the NHL. Nick ranked 16th among NHL forwards with 62 blocked shots (three of which came here and earned him TSN's "No Guts, No Glory" honor), had the third-best +/-ON/60 of any forward in the League at five-aside and, while he didn't spend much time killing penalties, did a (relatively) good job of it when called upon. Backstrom even took 40% fewer minor penalties in 2009-10 than in 2008-09. Finally, Backstrom helped stoke the Caps to a 3-1 first-round series lead over the Habs with nine points in four games (including a four-point effort concluding with a hat-trick goal in overtime of Game 2). Unfortunately, it went downhill from there.
The Bad: It's hard to find too much that didn't go right for Backstrom in 2009-10. His season - like that of the entire team - ended in crash-and-burn fashion, but for Backstrom there's a bit of an explanation: he dislocated his shoulder in Game 3. And while he piled up monster numbers, there's still the perception in some circles that he rode coattails to get there. Oh, and those gaudy numbers will certainly increase the dollars on his new deal. Yeah, we're grasping. We'll stop now.
The Vote: Rate Backstrom below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
The Discussion: How much, per year, is Backstrom worth? What would you like to see Backstrom improve on in 2010-11? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
332 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rate Backstrom below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season – if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 4, 2010 11:02 AM EDT reply actions 9 recs
I’ll rec this every time it’s the first comment to a Wrap post.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I gave him a 9. I think he can do better ;-).
by DrinkingPartner on May 4, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions
Gave him an 8 because I expected him to be great, and he was better than great.
Calder Cup gon' get Perreaultwned
...
Agreed on all counts.
Although he should probably get a 10 just for this alone
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 17 recs
oh man, that’s beautiful
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
the pass to yourself off the boards is one of my favorite plays in hockey. gordo did it effortlessly during the playoffs at one point, and i was like “FIRST LINE CENTER!!!” before i got control of myself.
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
it’s almost as awesome as Gordo’s bank shot into the empty net in Buffalo this season
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
One of the best parts of that video is the pass to himself off the boards…fucking epic.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
and the fact that he’s the one that lost the puck to begin with, and THEN went and got it back and did his thing.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
watching him turn Chicago’s much-vaunted defense inside out was pretty awesome, too.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Here comes Boyd Gor-don he’s..a beserker…
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 4, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i shouldn’t joke, since i might’ve been the first to nominate gordon last season (at #16, he ended up coming in #17). we disagreed then, too. still, the only inexcusable player i ranked lower than gordon was fehr, and a lot of us had written him off after double shoulder surgery. i’ll fight for gordo around the same spot, especially given this season’s disappearing act by steckel.
Nice recall. Looks like everyone involved in that conversation got disappointed.
I waited all year for this?
We’re Caps fans – everyone involved in every conversation got disappointed.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Let's not forget this

Pretty cool. And no cover curse either.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on May 4, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
curses have difficulty with trans Atlantic travel
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on May 4, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
The airline food gets them every time…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
you think anton gustafsson will be the next capital swede on there?
~~~ R0cK D@ R3D ~~~
by Chaz-Capapalooza on May 4, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Nope. It’ll be Nick again in a few years.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Nope – Lundqvist. Wait, I’ve said too much…
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Hmmmmmm….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I meant to give him a 9 but clicked 10 by accident (I’m still asleep). 9 Because he was almost the best I could have imagined him being. I expected him to reach somewhere around 90-100 points but never thought he would top 30 goals this season.
I’d like to see him improve on faceoffs, but that’s about all I can ask for. Otherwise, I’m being greedy.
DC Landing Strip - Waxed and Ready to Go
I gave him a 10. Not only did he demolish my expectations for the year, I see even more upside as it seems like he is still gaining confidence in his abilities to beat defenders one on one and create his own shots.
but is it:
the best year you could have imagined him having[?]
That’s why he got a 9 from me.
by DrinkingPartner on May 4, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I think between 9 and 10 is splitting hairs, but I’m not sure that I could have realistically imagined a better year.
Know parade, know 10.
No parade, no 10.
I know its an individual focus for these ratings, but individual performance is enhanced by team success. For guys that I expect a lot from (Backis is one of them) team success does factor into their individual success. I did give him a 9 though. He played like it was a contract year.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
by Sct112 on May 4, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Yup, a nine. No tens for this team unless they won the cip. (well, Backstrom might have deserved one if they won a game in the finals.)
by RPI93 on May 4, 2010 11:26 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He did carry the team at times early in the series.
Who was that guy/captain for the Blackhawks who scored seemingly all the goals for them in a badly one-sided Stanley Cup Finals maybe 10 years ago? I would give a 10 to a guy who did beyond believable even if the team comes up short. If Bax had been able to keep it up through the whole series injury or not I may have been tempted to give him a 10 regardless of not moving on to round two. (Just one opinion tho)
Last time the Hawks were in the Finals was 1991 against Pittsburgh.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Roenick or Larmer?
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I want to say it was Dirk Graham in that ‘91 Cup series where they got swept.
Couldn’t find his stats for that specific series particularly easily tho.
Michel Goulet had a similar moustache
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
So, is this voting based on the regular season or do the playoffs count as well? Because if we’re including the playoffs, I agree that unless you the win the Cup, noone deserves a 10.
Winning the Cup’s a team thing, with very limited applicability if we’re evaluating how an individual player performed. I mean, if Matt Bradley put up 30 goals next year, wouldn’t be deserve a ‘10’ by the criteria set forth, regardless of how the team fared?
by David Getz on May 4, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
if Matt Bradley turns into a 30 goals scorer, I think I’ll die of shock.
but I get what you’re saying, and I’m in agreement. Each player should be judged individually, the results of the team as a whole should not come into it. In Nick’s case, look at the Olympics. Team Sweden failed, they should have been in the medal rounds. But that should not take away from the fact that Nick went out there and was one of the best players of the tourney.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
by RedBirdie on May 4, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
OK, winning the Cup aside, the distinction I’m making is similar to the Hart voting. Are we just considering the regular season or does their performance in the playoffs count as well?
OK, then he drops to a 9 for me. He exceeded every expectation I had for him going into the regular season, but his performance in the last three crucial playoff games was disappointing.
He had three points in Game 4 with said shoulder.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
If the playoffs didn’t count, they wouldn’t be referenced so frequenytly in the post.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on May 4, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Its about expectations and role on the team. Individual accomplishments for Bradley are weighted more heavily than for the superstars like Backstrom. A larger part of their individual success is based on team success.
Maybe that isn’t fair, or is outside of the scope of this exercise, but that is the way I approached it.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
I agree with you up to a 9…but for a player to have the absolute best year I could imagine (on this team as it currently sits) that would involve helping the team maximize it’s potential which has to be on the level of at least winning the East. If we’re looking at this team 2 or 3 years ago then the team success level isn’t nearly as important to me. I look at it this way, seeing what 54 wins and 121 points means to us right now, would it matter one bit if anyone on the team put up ridiculous individual numbers next year for us to think they had “the best year they can possibly have”?
At the highest level of grading (a 10) in my opinion, the potential and expectations of where this team could/should be do factor in.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on May 4, 2010 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions
For the top players, carrying this team in the playoffs is part of my expectations, so for them, the team’s playoff success or lack there of has an real impact on their grades. But I don’t expect the same for role players, so if they have a great regular season and a great playoffs, I wouldn’t mark them down because of the team’s early exit. And it’s not just about winning the Cup. If this team played extremely well, but lost in the SCF or the ECF, I’d be more willing to give players a 10.
Waiting 'til next year.
when i was thinking about this last year for AO, i decided on a 10. sometimes it’s important to distinguish between “the best year you could have imagined him having [in 2009-2010]” and “the best year you could have imagined him having [during his career].” i know backstrom can be better, but man he really made the leap this year to super-elite status.
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I expected 20-25 goals, 80 points or so. Backstrom exceeded my expectations and earned a 9. To get a 10 next season, Backstrom needs to lead the league in points, or finish top 3 in points but score 40 goals.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
I gave him a 9, because I expected him to be better than last year, but adding 50% to his goal production was pretty shocking. Add that to his playoff performance prior to the shoulder dislocation, and yeah… its a 9.
Now if only he’d sign for $6M a year….
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
I gave myself a 19. The benefit of a first round loss: everything is on sale at NHL.com for 25% off, so I picked up a couple jerseys.
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
by iwearstripes on May 4, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I ordered a Backstrom jersey a few weeks ago too. I was hoping it would get here in time for me to wear it to a Caps playoff game :-/
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Seriously? I might have to replace my Chimera jersey…
'Cause the end of what it was is what it is right now...
Until tomorrow, IIRC.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I added Chimera to my cart, but my brother sent me a text message not to buy it, because it will be hard to return if I end up with two of them.
I believe I ruined someone’s plans for a birthday gift.
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
Maybe you could trade one for a Clark and a Jurcina.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on May 4, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Zing!
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I added Chimera to my cart, but my brother sent me a text message not to buy it, because it will be hard to return if I end up with two of them.
I know a doughy-headed Rink Rat who might be interested in your duplicate.
They're coming.
As in Doh’boy, whose Chimera jersey was stolen at a bar (and contributes to why he doesn’t like DC). He likes the Caps — just not the city.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Its gotta be alot of cocktails
to leave a person so intoxicated they don’t feel the sweater taen off their back.
Remember no means no, but mumble means mumble?
A danger to myself and others on the ice
I’m between 8 and 9, leaning 9. Frankly, he blew me away this year, and I can only imagine him having had a better season if he’d done some more PKing, won more draws and single-handedly willed the team into Round 2 (and perhaps beyond). But that’s getting a bit nit-picky.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Your last point is a really good one. Since he is so valuable to the team, it is probably fair to dock him based on the playoff loss, no matter how he played individually. Not sure that the expectation was in place before the season that the playoffs could be on his shoulders, but it certainly wasn’t far off.
I also think that it’s fair to ding him a bit for the PP failures in the playoffs (and, to be honest, I should have included that in “The Bad”).
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’m between 8 and 9, leaning 9.
Yep. Went 9.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 4, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
I went 8, only because he’d already turned my expectations up considerably. To say that he exceeded them would be an understatement, yet the most wondrous thing is that I still see room for growth in his game. Especially if he keeps developing that wonderful scoring touch.
"In the depths of winter, I learned there was in me an invincible summer" ~Albert Camus
Went from a hard one in Alzner to an easy one in Backstrom. No player on this roster was more important to the overall team success than Nick, IMO. He was amazing all year, he played tougher and didn’t get hurt or hurt the team with minors. The amazing part is that he is still a kid and hasn’t gotten to his peak. He needs to work on his faceoffs, but that is nitpicking.
I hope and pray that Mackan is half as good as Nick, we’ll be set at C.
An easy 9.
4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
I’m the same way. I expected around 90+ pts, and he got 100, so that’s not a huge increase but still better than expected. I didn’t expect a 30 goal season from him though, the way he was shooting this year was great. His maturity and poise on the ice was also incredible, and he continues to improve his faceoff abilities. And I think he seriously damaged the “riding the cottails” argument with the number of times he took over a game by himself. So I went with a 9.
Next year he’d have to get 40+ goals and 110+ pts, put in good PK minutes, and get his faceoffs up to the low to mid 50s to get a 10 from me.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 4, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I expected 90-100 points, 25-30 goals. He exceeded those expectations slightly.
8
For a 10 next year: Art Ross, 40 goals, Conn Smythe, bumping his FO% to around 53 or higher and maintaining his solid defensive play.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
82 games played
love this guy. love his consistency. love that he showed up in the playoffs. love his attitude on and off the ice. i wish i could add more to the discussion, but backstrom continues to exceed my expectations and set new bars for himself. i gave him a 9, which would have been my highest score this season if it weren’t for a certain american hero.
Gave Tom Poti a ten, didja?
Calder Cup gon' get Perreaultwned
by jordanDC on May 4, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec’d with a couple of shiny metal plates and a whole lotta stitches.
"If you close your eyes in the NHL, you'll take one upside the head." - Alexander Semin
by mercurialwinger on May 4, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I gave him an 8. I was expecting him to have this kind of season eventually, but not this soon.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions
Gave him an 8. could easily have been a 9 but i dont want him to get a big head about it nor do i want the high score to be used to suck more money out of ted’s pocket (cause you know he and his agent will read this). i’d say his faceoff percentage was the biggest negative this year, and if i recall he may have had a run there where his f/o percentage dipped below 40%…i could be wrong on that. the pp failure in the playoffs was another negative as well, which he shares with the other first unit pp guys. overall, not bad for a guy who doesnt have an “nhl body”.
i’d say i had some pretty high expectations from him and he didnt dissapoint in the least. therefore in my eyes it would have been hard for him to earn a 10 unless he was a hart finalist. i must say his t shirt on breakup day almost caused me to move my vote to a 9.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
also, he is worth more than the $6M semin is getting next year but hard to justify more than the 9.0 that crosby and malkin earn. so i’d say a salary in the $7-7.5 range for 5/6 years would be just about right. would not mind seeing a 10yr deal averaging in the $7M/yr cap hit. kane/toews are in at $6.5/yr cap hit which are pretty good comparables too.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on May 4, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Fact Checking
Neither Crosby nor Malkin make “more than 9.0.”
They both make $8.7m.
'Cause the end of what it was is what it is right now...
(Also, Toews and Kane have a cap hit of 6.3)
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on May 4, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Their cap hit is 8.7 They make 9 overall.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Which is still pretty steep for a team with well documented financial difficulties (although they are opening a new building)
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
But does anyone other than Mario care what they actually make?
Analytically, the only number that’s relevant, in my opinion, is cap hit. Unless of course you’re talking about a cheapskate team like NSH or FLA that is looking to pare overall salary, in which case, the $9m number would probably matter.
'Cause the end of what it was is what it is right now...
Its not that PIT is a “cheapskate” team, but they’re in a pretty limited market, although their financial situation has changed drastically since they were about to move, and they’re getting a new building.
It just limits what they can put around those two, although that hasn’t seemed to hurt them yet.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ll put it this way….it would probably matter a lot more if they were still playing in Civic Arena for the next few years than Consol Energy Center.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes. The Mellon Arena doesn’t have much in the way of “luxury” boxes (they’re at the top of of the who place) and there’s virtually no club or high revenue generating seats.
Consol has all the bells and whistles, meaning they’re going to generate a whole lot more revenue.
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war and there ain't no turnin' back. I mean, s---, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it. If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight."
No doubt. But is there enough of a corporate clientele in Pittsburgh to buy the boxes cosistently?
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
66 Luxury suites? Is that number a tribute to the first ever NHL player to wear that number?
Yes, I mean the immortal Milan Novy…. :)
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions
It also seats 18,087 for hockey
wocka wocka
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
leaving aside the 87…..
I’m surprised that’s all it seats. I would have thought they would aim for about 20,000 (well, 20,087).
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Looks like it holds just under 20 for concerts and basketball.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m surprised that’s all it seats. I would have thought they would aim for about 20,000 (well, 20,087).
Given the market-size, 20k is a little much. Especially if there are lean years. Doesn’t look too good if 12/13 thousand people are in a 20k rink. (Not that it should happen anytime soon).
Trust me, as someone who’s been in there, it’s plenty big. Maybe just because it was half built and a lot open but it seemed bigger than Verizon to me.
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war and there ain't no turnin' back. I mean, s---, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it. If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight."
seats at the Booth are rather…..cozy. Capacity is 18,277
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
The UD in Pittsburgh will be “steeper” than Verizon. Take out the 200 level seats in the VC and put an upperdeck right on top of lower bowl seats and you more or less have the rough logistics. It’s steep, but doesn’t seem that high from the highest point.
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war and there ain't no turnin' back. I mean, s---, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it. If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight."
I was in town for the Pens vs. Hawks in December, and got to see the progress on the new arena. It looks incredible. From everything I’ve read, they’re doing it right too.
The juxtaposition of the old church and the new arena side by side is kind of hilarious. Especially since the arena is built basically around the church.
I am a hockey fan first, and a Caps fan second.
Some poor sap actually had to count every single seat to double check that it is exactly 18,087 capacity for hockey.
I also heard they were searching for a way to incorporate 71 somethings or other, if you were curious/thinking conspiracy.
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war and there ain't no turnin' back. I mean, s---, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it. If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight."
Curious, not really. Conspiracy-minded, absolutely.
Actually, I’m a little jealous of your new barn. It looks awf’lly sweet.
I’m curious to see it. as far a new arenas go, I’ve recently been to Dallas and Charlotte and they just went so overboard with luxury boxes. I know those bring in a lot of money, but it seemed like so much was sacrificed to jam more boxes into both those places, it wasn’t visually appealing. the VC actually strikes a good balance with the placement of boxes.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
I agree about the VC, and the new Pittsburgh arena is similiar with the boxes above the first concourse (as most are these days). But I don’t think the suite level affects sightlines in the upper bowl.
From my non-expert opinion (I’ve been to Wash, Car, ATL, NYI, NJ’s new monster) and even though I haven’t been to the “worst seat” in every building, they seem closer and with better views fro my peak at Consol than anywhere else.
"Don't matter who did what to who at this point. Fact is, we went to war and there ain't no turnin' back. I mean, s---, it's what war is, you know? Once you in it, you in it. If it's a lie, then we fight on that lie. But we gotta fight."
Plus Mellon has many seats with a limited view of the ice, and the concourses are too narrow to support a sellout crowd. The last time I was there it took almost half an hour to get out of the building (it was Game 4 last year)… not a good thing.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Had no idea until recently it was the oldest arena in the league. I would have guessed Nassau
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Mellon is the only home arena the Pens have ever had. They’re the last of the 1967 expansionists to get a new arena. Hell, two of the teams from that expansion had to move to get new arenas (Oakland to Cleveland to bankruptcy, Minnesota to Dallas).
Even some of the teams from the 1990s expansions have new arenas (Sharks, Panthers, Lightning).
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn’t the Sharks bounce around for a while? I remember when they first came in they were playing at The Cow Palace and being haunted by Keith Moon’s ghost.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
in case anyone is curious, here is a listing of all the teams, arenas that served as their homes and years used, and the year the arena was built.
the 3 oldest arenas that will be in use next season are:
MSG (1968)
Nassau Veteran’s (1972)
Rexall Place (1974)
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Although MSG has been renovated pretty much in its entirety while still in use. Nassau is pretty awful though. Never been to Rexall….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I voted 10. In no way did I expect Backstrom to:
a) break 100 points.
b) break 30 goals.
c) become a solid penalty killer
d) finish 4th in league scoring.
d) is definitely the key stat for me. Yeah, I kind of expected top 10, maybe, but I certainly didn’t expect him to finish with point totals that were well north of players like Joe Thornton, Evgeni Malkin, Ilya Kovalchuk, Zach Parise, or Pavel Datsyuk. For some reason, I actually thought last year would be right around his peak performance. I figured he might break 90 points, but it would come from two or three more goals – not eight or nine more. Oh, and his first career hat trick: I don’t think I ever expected that.
For him to earn a 10 next year, he’d have to win the Art Ross trophy and edge out Alex Ovechkin for a Hart nomination.
"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"
"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."
I gave him a 9, but I think now I’m leaning closer towards on 8. I don’t blame him for getting injured in the playoffs, but it still reflected in his performance.
For next season, he’d get a 5 if he essentially duplicated this season with a better FO%. To get a 10, he’d have to get 40+ goals, 115+ points, even better defensive play, a FO% over 52, and then dominate in the playoffs.
Waiting 'til next year.
duplicating this season would earn him a 5 in your book? i love what nick brought to the table this year, and i don’t doubt he’s the real deal…but i’m also not going to chalk up 100 points every year, not yet. if he scores 85-90 and continues to play big minutes and a big role on the power play, that would be my 5-6 score.
our 10s look similar, though. 115+, either a significantly improved goal-scoring rate or a significantly improved FO%, and a great playoffs.
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
40/70/110 or 35/75/110 are realistic ceilings. Nobody in the league has topped 115 in 3 years. In my mind any season with comparable numbers equaling what he did scoring wise this year would be fine, maybe a slight increase. It’s the little things now like faceoffs, making the PP more dynamic, and earning more of the PK work while making it better. Not to mention helping to lead the team to the SCF.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on May 4, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions
he gets a 9 from me
Was torn between 9 and 10. He was just much better than I expected…not just in point production (I expected 20-ish goals and 85ish pts) but especially his ability to protect the puck and control play in the offensive zone. Defensively he was very strong. Faceoffs he could still afford to improve on a bit, but he was still solid in that regard.
How much, per year, is Backstrom worth? What would you like to see Backstrom improve on in 2010-11? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
To earn a 10 next year, he’s probably gonna have to put up league-leading point totals and 40ish goals…which is really not that big a jump from this year. I think he is probably worth 8+ mil, but I think we can realistically sign him for closer to 7. The biggest thing he needs to improve on next year is faceoffs.
i remember being a little jealous of both kane and toews at one point during their shared rookie seasons. no longer. give me nicky in a re-draft every time.
true that. and in hanlon’s system, backstrom must have been gripping his stick a little tighter. although it would also be fair to guess that backstrom just had a slower learning curve; he really hasn’t stopped steadily improving.
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
… and played him on the wing because he wasn’t ready to play center in the NHL.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I just had a bad acid flashback
/shudder
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
For shits and giggles
Line up from Boudreau’s first game
Ovechkin-Kozlov-Clark
Fleischmann-Nylander-Semin
Pettinger-Steckel-Gordon
Brashear-Laich/Backstrom-Bradley
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Final line up
Forwards:
Ovechkin-Kozlov-Clark
Fleischmann-Nylander-Semin
Laich-Steckel-Gordon
Brashear-Backstrom-Bradley
‘D’ parings:
Pothier-Poti
Green Morrisonn
Erskine-Eminger
Kolzig
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
From checking line center to 100++ points in 3 years…not bad.
by Direction 87 on May 4, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
jeez, no wonder it took him 15 games to score his first nhl goal…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on May 4, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
That Fleischmann-Nylander-Semin line will end lives.
Mostly in suicides from Caps fans.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
i think pettinger-nylander-semin got some run too. the PeNyS line…bada bing…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on May 4, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m guessing lots of dangling and stickhandling from such a line.
The bed will not be shat.
by Rather Bengt on May 4, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Are there good acid flashbacks? I’ve never heard one of those stories.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
9. I had high expectations, but he demolished them. 101 points is a hell of a feat these days, his goal scoring went through the roof, and his overall play is really turning into something special-he managed to play with this wonderful combination of calm and snarl this season.
he would have gotten a 10 had he cracked 50% on FOs this season.
He’s an absolute joy to watch; we’re incredibly lucky.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
9
not a 10 because he is not playing hockey right now and the playoffs are not over.
Will he have a better year in his career??? Probably, well hopefully, but this year’s performance following a great previous year is more than I expected but I feel it was a year short of his full potential. We all knew he was good but did we put him in the discussion as a top 5-10 player in the NHL before this season? Next year to get the 10 we are discussing whether or not he is a in the top 1-5 players in the league thus he vying for the Hart.
His worth is hard to say I think, I would be estactic with a 8-10 year deal at a 7 million cap hit per year.
Forget about finding your perfect match, I want a website where you can find your perfect arch-nemesis
10
Had to give him the Bradley. I figured his floor would be 60-65 points. Now his floor looks more like 75-80 points. He’s improved on the faceoff, put some decent minutes in on the PK and has shown remarkable defensive prowess. The fact that he shoots now is just icing on the cake. It feels a bit homer-ish voting a 10, but at the same time he’s wildly exceeded any expectations for me.
I never would have thought it to be fair to compare him to Crosby before this year but right now it almost feels like I will compare Crosby to Backstrom one day.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
8
He played above my expectations, improved in the goal scoring, was magic on the PP during the regular season and was a force all year long. He needs to improve on his faceoffs.
To get a 10 he needs to win the cup. to get a 9 he needed to gget his team out of the first round. Plain and simple.
I’d pay him top dollar and lock him up. He was a home run and you don’t get that very often at all. There are only a few guys in the NHl that can do what he does, and he’s only 22.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 11:29 AM EDT reply actions
To get a 10 he needs to win the cup. to get a 9 he needed to gget his team out of the first round. Plain and simple.
So if Backstrom puts up 45 goals and 130 points, plays Selke-caliber defense, and wins 55% of his faceoffs, and scores two points per game in the playoffs, but the Capitals don’t make it out of the first round, he gets an ‘8’?
No, we’re talking this year right? 10 for the cup, I’d have given a 9 for the second round. If next year he gets 45 goals and 130 points, selke d, and 55% of his faceoffs as well as 2pts per in the playoffs, he gets a 10. Those are amazing numbers. He didn’t have those numbers.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry bout that. In retrospect, I didn’t make myself clear.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
I think in such an extreme case you have to give him a 10. Or rather, a 9.99999999998.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on May 4, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
If he puts up those numbers we make it out of the first round pretty much any year at this point.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on May 4, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions
To get a 10 he needs to win the cup.
Is it fair to base an individual player’s ranking on a team accomplishment? Certainly Backstrom’s contribution in the playoffs is fair game, but why negatively impact his score based on a team failure? Are you going to subtract two from every player’s ranking just because the Caps did not win the Cup?
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 4, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is it fair to base an individual player’s ranking on a team accomplishment?
YES
Sincerely,
Every Sidney Crosby Fan and Most Hockey Columnists
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on May 4, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I think for the more important players part of having a good season is leading a team to a championship. It shouldn’t factor in too much, but nevertheless a factor, because then you know the player did something right, and did it well.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on May 4, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
10
Gave him a 10 because he had the best year I could have imagined him having this year. He was better in every single category than I expected him to be be, but where I thought he really raised his game was big game takeover moments / key goals.
Off the top of my head: GWPPG at MSG vs Rangers in come from behind win. GWG Chicago OT with OVIE tossed. GWG against Detroit at home. Playoff hatrick with team down by 3. Who knows how many assists to set up GWG, plus shot blocking animal on a 5 v 3 without his stick (cant remember the team).
Plus…. the dude is down to earth and ego-less therefore perfect to play with Ovie for a long time…
I had high expectations, but they were in the 90 pts range. So that bumps him up from the 5-6 range. I also didn’t expect him to score as much as he did, which bumps him up another. I guess I could have given him a 9, but his faceoffs prevented that if you ask me. So he gets an 8 from me.
But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.
by Steckel Me Elmo on May 4, 2010 11:43 AM EDT reply actions
I rated Backstrom a 9. The only stat that did not exceed my expectations was his faceoff percentage, particularly at even strength as his PP faceoff percentage is right where it should be. I would like to see his total percentage over 50% for the ’10-’11 season. Also, his faceoffs slipped in the post season, even on the power play where he was relied upon heavily. I want our top PP center to be dominating the dot so the PP can set up after a faceoff. The entire power play unit was dysfunctional against the Habs, but a portion of the blame has to fall on Backstrom. That is pretty much the only thing that prevented me from scoring him a 10.
Backstrom has now has set a ridiculous benchmark for himself, so it is difficult to quantify exactly how he can improve in order to get a 10 next season. He would have to maintain or improve his current offensive production and improve his faceoffs. He would have to have a high scoring postseason and net some power play goals as well. Perhaps he could improve his defensive game, though he is no slouch there either. Maybe a Selke nomination? I don’t know; I am reaching at this point.
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 4, 2010 11:44 AM EDT reply actions
Something to think about: Backstrom has now proven he can be relied upon to play every game by skating in all 82 games for three straight seasons. If he were to miss a handful of games in the 2010-2011 season, how significantly would that impact his ranking next year?
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 4, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions
If he needs to rest a body part for a game or two during the season, he should sit. These “ironman streaks” are silly if it means a player is more prone to injury in the playoffs.
I say this because the Swedish reports seem to indicate he’d had trouble with his shoulder more than once in the season, and perhaps a little nacho duty would have been a good idea. Especially after we wrapped up a playoff spot. On the one hand, of course, one or two games out might have meant no 30th goal or 100th point for Nicky. On the other hand, a healthy shoulder might have gotten the team to Round Two.
i know that milestones like 30 goals/100 points are important for players, but i think we can all agree that the pursuit of those numbers needs to take a back seat to team goals. if that means sitting ov in meaningless games when he’s got 49 goals or nicky at 99 points, so be it. hope the players feel the same way…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on May 4, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
The shoulder wasn’t an issue until the playoffs though, so I don’t think regular season rest would have necessarily prevented/helped that
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on May 4, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
supposedly it happened two or three times during the season, if i’m remembering ice warrior’s post correctly?
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The first quote about the shoulder I translated was from his agent and that sounded like it was a problem he had been dealing with for awhile. In the translation I did yesterday it was Bäckström himself talking about it and he said that it didn’t happen until game three.
What can I say I’m a JP fangirl. I will follow him into the darkest and filthiest of alleys, even the comment section at Puck Daddy.
ahh, thanks. i’d missed yesterday’s comment.
by Natty Bumppo on May 4, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I guess it would depend on why he missed them. Freak injuries can happen to anyone. If it’s a knee/groin/hip that are of the “chronic injury” variety I’d be more concerned.
I waited all year for this?
I’m a little concerned about the migrane issue. Just a little, since it’s only pulled him out of games 3 times (??), but any head issue is an issue in my book. That said, I still gave him a 9 for exceeding expectations for the year.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
The Contract...
I’d love for Backstrom to take a hometown discount of lets say $6.5M x 8yrs. I think $6.5M is a bargain now, in 3 yrs it will be a steal. But something tells me we are looking at a low $7.0M number at 5 or 6 years. But I have no idea. Honestly if we sign him before July 1 and its for multiple years, I’ll be happy, even at $7.5M per.
4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
i gave him a 10.
my expectations were high, but not top 4 in scoring. he got the extra umph up to ten in my book for a few intangibles i continued to notice throughout the year that i never would have expected.
-he got bigger/stronger, thus harder and harder to knock off the puck
-he did not cower under pressuer without ovechkin…see chicago game as perfect example
-commitment to defense / shot blocking
-leadership/determination…i was in chicago for game 2…when i watched the interview with koken before the overtime the question to #19 was “what to do you need to do different in the OT?” Backstrom looking determined and almost pissed off said “Score the goal.” and then he took over and made it happen…i loved that!
I love ovie, but i think it was nicky’s play that will keep him from a 3rd straight Hart…and that is crazily above expectations.
He got a 10 for me. I was expecting him to regress in terms of goal-scoring, certainly not score 30.
I also wasn’t expecting him to make the quantum leap in assertiveness that caused him to increase his SOG by over 25% from last year. More than anything, that was the biggest improvement in his game.
To me, this was the year Nicky’s confidence began to match his talent. And from here, the sky’s the limit.
Now he’s set the bar pretty high. For him to hit a 10 next year, it’ll take a Cup or a Hart. A Selke or Ross would get him a 9.
Heh. Our first “1” troll has shown up. Welcome!
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I'm Betting it's Callahan
If only for this:

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
...
I would like to have him for all the “Callahan Auto Parts” jokes we can do.

I make car parts for the American working man….because that’s who I am….and that’s who I care about
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t mind having Callahan… he’s Matt Bradley with more of a scoring touch…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
absolutely agree. Sather would be a fool to give him up, which means it could really happen.
99 problems and a coach ain't one.
+1
Rager fan here, and you nailed it right on the head.
by Ahmad Bradshaw on May 5, 2010 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Probably thought the poll question was, “How many players on the Caps are more valuable than Backstrom?”
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 4, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Someone being a goofball. I wish I had thought of it first.
However long the night, the dawn will break again
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 4, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Either that or their expectations of Backstrom are absurdly high.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I bet it was the French judge.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
They are just thinking about the ongoing bargaining process. I can see Backis’ agent going to GMGM and saying “Japers’ Rink did a rink wrap, and my client only got 8s,9s, and10s.” The troll is just looking out for the best interest of the team.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
it was mcphee…he knows rink wrap ratings are used in salary negotiations…
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on May 4, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Backstrom vs. Backstrom guide!
I think chris meet Alex did this


Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
by RedBirdie on May 4, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
sorry! Eeek, embarrassing.
Well done, YNC!
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Yep, ‘twas me. Though I’m honored to be in the company of Chris meet Alex. This was the game that cost us Mike Knuble for three weeks. AO was still healing up his shoulder and was pulling pressbox duty that night. Flash was still in the Rinl’s good graces b/c he stepped up big when Ovi was out. I had a nice convo afterwards with a Minny reporter – he was really impressed with the Caps’ game-day experience.
Or a disgruntled guy whose girlfriend wears a Backstrom jersey to bed.
4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
by JSchon on May 4, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
or someone from a country that hates Sweeden.
Hmm… Denmark?
Fucking Danes!
by Brainumbc on May 4, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Gotta rec a Metalocalypse reference….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I love Metalocalypse but I don’t remember that quote.
Heh. I just went to Denmark once and for some reason everyone there took the ferry to Sweeden to get their alcohol.
Ok, it’s almost time to stop the OT stuff, but it was said when the Queen of Denmark (played by Lars Ulrich of Metallica) ended up being killed at one of their concerts…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
It was probably Nylander.
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.
by HBK on May 4, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
9
Didn’t expect him to be top-5 in scoring, also didn’t expect the goal explosion.
I think, on the open market, Backstrom is worth $7-7.5m. I hope he stays for between $6.5 and $7m.
I think he needs to work on his faceoffs for next year – that . . . and. . . um. . . his playoff beard? (#needsmoreforsberg)
Seriously, he needs to maintain his goal-scoring pace (which I doubt he’ll do) and improve his faceoffs, particularly his offensive-zone faceoffs on the PP. Start winning more of those and our (regular season) PP becomes even more lethal.
'Cause the end of what it was is what it is right now...
Perhaps he’ll stay for 2 million and “all you can eat meatballs” at Ikea College Park..
Bork Byork dork york! Kjergen Schvergen!
Personal Chef?

'Cause the end of what it was is what it is right now...
by D'ohboy on May 4, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
And seriously… We need to get a movement going to convince Ted to purchase the rights to a Sweedish Chef clip so we can show it after Backstrom scores.
You guys know you’d want to see that shit
And next on Forces of Hockey, Professor Honeydew demonstrates the force a slapshot can exert on a puck with his assistant Beaker….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Mike Wilbon probably gave him a one, thinking points in hockey are equivalent to points in hockey. “How can he be a starting player when he averages slightly over a point per game?! He should be averaging 20 at least! Go 76ers!”
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 12:50 PM EDT reply actions
Fail. I mean to say “thinking points in basketabll are equivalent to points in hockey.”
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 4, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I gave Nick a 7, although now I have click remorse and wish I had gone with 8, or even a 9.
Coming into the season, I was expecting him to slightly better his totals from the last season, 22/66/88. Maybe a couple more assists, maybe three more goals, so 25/68/93. He beat that handily in the goal scoring department – that alone is worth an above expectations grade. He was right about where I thought he would be assist-wise, so that keeps me from going over the moon.
My expectations were for a top-five center coming into this year – I expected the two in Pittsburgh, Datsyuk, Thornton and Getzlaf to have better seasons. What I got was a top-three center – only Sedin and Crosby had better results this season. Great chemistry with Ovechkin and Knuble, great job on the powerplay, shooting a very high percentage, this was a very, very good year.
I could have imagined Nick getting 30-odd goals and 75 assists this season, playing with the PP we have. I didn’t quite get that, but I think it’s possible in the future. He’s got a few more seasons to crack the 110 point mark (to do it, I think he’s basically an assist-per-game player who gets ~30 goals) and I think he will…once.
I know that there was some derision about Corsi with-and-without-you, but I think the concept is interesting – who is dependent on whom for results? I’d love Nick to sign for under 7, but I think 7-7.5 is most likely for a guy with his numbers, even if he was playing with Ovechkin. Much more in-depth discussion on this coming in a future fanpost.
To earn a 10 next season, Nick needs to break 110 points, or win the Conn Smythe. He’s got to improve his faceoffs and he’s got to improve his Fenwick/Corsi numbers to Ovechkin levels. He’ll have to challenge Crosby for the title of “Best Center in the NHL”. That’s the best season I can imagine the guy having, in my wildest dreams.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on May 4, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions
I gave him an 8 for many of the reasons you cited.
Where do you predict his salary numbers? (sorry if I missed them else where)
I feel like he has to be higher than Semin’s 6MM, but would be stoked if he took an identical deal to the Sedin’s (6.1 per) or Datsuk (6.7 per). I think he will be more likely using Zetterberg (7.5MM per but only 6ishMM cap hit) as a starting point and sign something similar.
by ThreePingPost on May 4, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I haven’t written the fanpost yet, I have another final to get through this weekend, then I’ll begin in earnest.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on May 4, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Next to the “1” vote, can we add GO FLYERS!
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on May 4, 2010 1:29 PM EDT reply actions
9
Going between 8 and 9 I decided on the latter. Backs is the team’s MVP this year in my eyes. Exceeded my expectations in adding a goal-scoring touch to his wonderful playmaking skills, helping carry the team when Ovie was out (see Chicago game), showing a maturity beyond his years, and fine-tuning is defensive skills. He is my favourite player on the team and along with Pavel Datsyuk probably my favourite player to watch league wide.
What I hope for next year: improvement in the FO %, less wonky shoulders, less migraines, and more Selke.
The bed will not be shat.
http://www.sportscity.com/nhl/2010-nhl-unrestricted-free-agents-by-position/
wow…all I have to say is, SAKU SAKU SAKU
We need that number 2 C behind nicky here!
~~~ R0cK D@ R3D ~~~
by Chaz-Capapalooza on May 4, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions
We’re discussing that in today’s Clips thread.
by EmilyB on May 4, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Money
I wish GMGM can lock him untill Ovie’s contract ends.
The deal will get done, and while he may not be signed until 2021, he will be here most of the upcoming decade….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
8 from me.
Next year Nicky is going to start to have to play like Sid the Child, to get a 10.
proud 4th line advocate
if Nicky fails to throw a tempter tantrum on ice, you’re only going to give him a 9, I can see it now.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
You mean he has to complain about all the hats by WhiteMage’s TV on the ice when someone gets a hat trick?
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
and this is a great excuse to link my favorite History Will Be Made parody
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
The only 10 I had in mind...
Because he outperformed my (already towering) expectations in the regs—I had no inkling he would eclipse 30 goals, for example, or that he would draw nearly 50% in the dot. So I gave him a ten.
I’d be very comfortable at 7 years and 50M…imo, worth it, even if it means missing out on Pat Marleau. Nick’s in the best pivot conversation (after Pavel and Sid) in the league. At 22.
Stay healthy, my friend.
99 problems and a coach ain't one.
Nick is only one of two 10’s for this season in my mind in terms of exceeding expectations….the other is also pretty early in the alphabet (hint: Not Jay Beagle).
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m guessing it rhymes with Real American Hero?
99 problems and a coach ain't one.
by bigonetimer on May 4, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nope… he’s Canadian…. (The Real American Hero is getting a 9, btw…)
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
To quote the former governor of Alaska, “You Betcha.”
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions
10
Nick gets the Full Bradley (Love that as a way to describe the ranking…) I had some high expectations, but I wasn’t thinking a 100 point season, 33 goals, top 5 in scoring, leading the league in points on the road, effective PK, getting his face off percentage above average, and (the big finish) increasing his points-per-game average in the playoffs from what it was in the regular season (admittedly a small sample, but it still is a sign of a quality player.)
The clincher would be the game in Chicago. With the team down 3-0 and without Ovechkin, Nick put the team on his back and said “follow me”. And when he made a mistake in the OT, he took the puck back and went end-to-end to score the game winner.
Next year to get a 10… do it again in the regular season, and do it for four playoff rounds.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
9
4th in scoring and more than 30 goals was significantly above my expectations. Failing to get out of the first round, due in large part to the PK, keeps it from being a 10.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
I just have one comment…pay the man.
We’ve got to many heroes. We need some monsters.
- The Jade Donkey
9
He had basically the season I though he would have in terms of assists but I never though the goal scoring would be that thigh.
Caps Snaps - Washington Capitals Photography
Founder of the Eric Fehr Fan Club.
For the record, the highest score ever in a Rink Wrap is Ovechkin’s 9.55 from 2007-08. AO’s 9.01 from last season and Huet’s 9.04 from 2007-08 are the only others to finish above 9.00. By my math, Nick’s currently at 9.19.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Sounds about right. Backstrom in my mind has had best season relative to expectations of any Capital since Boudreau took over
4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
I don’t know… AO’s 65-goal/+28 season coming off a 46-goal/-19 campaign was pretty special.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
No question. I will only argue that Ovechkin was the best player on the planet already and that he was capable of a monster year. I could be in the minority.
4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
I think that there was a lot of debate as to whether or not he was the best – “only” 46 goals and a woeful minus-19 had people mumbling…
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
He hadn’t as of then led the goals or points race outside of the first month I think (maybe first 6 weeks for goals) either.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on May 5, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Ovechkin’s 2007-08 was pretty special. I guess using that as a guide, Nicky would have needed to be an award finalist to get a 10.
Sig temporarily on hiatus to ease the pain.
VS. built a whole marketing campaign around Ovechkin’s run at 60. I think that goes beyond “pretty special.”
Un-freaking-believable comes to mind, though!
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
My expectations for Backstrom coming into this season were (I thought) a bit too high, but he blew past them. I gave him a 9 only because there are areas for improvement (like upping his FO%) and because he seems capable of further growth. He’s not going to get a full 10 until he’s absolutely maxed out his potential. The very idea that the Caps can have a player on roster with a season like Backstrom’s who has the potential for an even fuller game is fantastic — he’s worth every dollar of the millions he’ll be making. (High sixes to low sevens is my estimate.)
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
My expectations for Backstrom coming into this season were (I thought) a bit too high,
Not sure how you had such high expectations coming from your stomping grounds…
I waited all year for this?
Easy to have high expectations when one is faced with a player who could probably blow the entire Canes roster away with a bellowed “Flygplats!”
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
by alex_k on May 4, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
For mentioning FLYGPLATS, you get a rec.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, that was a sarcastic response to what may have been a serious question (or I am way, way overthinking the whole internet posting thing). It was hard not to have high expectations of Backstrom after his previous year, during which he racked up some far better than average numbers (themselves improved on the year before), especially for a player his age. I was expecting his overall improvement to continue into 2009-10, but was happily overshot by his growth.
As for the stomping grounds? 2 years in NW Va. If you can’t be with the one you love, love the one you’re with. Backstrom’s one of the players who make this seem like less of a fickle choice and more like a step onward and upward.
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
My comment was sarcastic. I was making a crack about anyone from Canes Country having high expectations for Nick.
I waited all year for this?
Ah, understood. I’m not from that particular neck of the woods.
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
Canes Country is a special place….
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Like Midvale.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on May 4, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Far Side gets a rec.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 5, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I gave him a 7. I am basically going to knock 3 points off each players regular season rating for what they did in the playoffs. Of course I may knock 4 off of Flash, Semin and Green for their disappearing act.
by CapsFanSince1979 on May 4, 2010 4:39 PM EDT reply actions
In the playoffs Backstrom score goals at a higher rate, scored points at a higher rate, had a better plus-minus per game, played more minutes, and had fewer penalties per game than he did in the regular season. Nicky was great in those seven games, especially since he played most of them with a bum should.
To me, it seems unfair to dock him for whatever failings the team as a whole had in the postseason.
Agreed. Backstrom (and Ovechkin) were outstanding in the playoffs. It wasn’t Nick not doing his job that cost the Caps….
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 4, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Good to see someone include both of them in that discussion. By comparison everyone else with the exception of Carlson or Poti fell by the wayside.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
by Davethecapsfan on May 4, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions
9
All in all, Backstrom was a beast this year. He’s become an amazing two way center, producing value on both the offensive and defensive ends. He’s a stalwart on the PK, he had 30+ goals, he had 100+ points. I mean, this was a huge jump for him in pretty much every aspect of the game. Anyone expecthing this kind of season from him going in had wildly high expectations.
Why is he not a 10? Well, I think he can still be better. But at this point, its just splitting hairs. I have a hard time giving anyone what would amount to a “perfect score.”
To get a 10 next year? Well, a bump up in scoring wouldn’t hurt. Improvement on the dot would help a lot too. It will probably be hard for Backs to get a 10 next year…because our expectations for him will now be pretty high already. Not that he cannot surpass those expectations…he is still young, still learning, and has a hell of a supporting cast around him.
On the salary question, I think he’s probably in line for 7-8 million a year, and he’d be worth every penny. If the Caps can get him resigned somewhere in the 6 mil area, well, I’d say that would be just phenomenal.
This is where we hold them! This is where we fight! This is where they die! Remember this day, men, for it will be yours for all time.
8.
I understand why there are a lot more votes for 9’s and 10’s, but in truth I was expecting 90+ points from him this year but the fact he topped 100 means to me he’s up at an 8 range. I could have gone with a 9 for almost matching Crosby’s point production during the year but there are still some things he can keep getting better at like his faceoff %.
For Nicky to earn a 10 next year I’d like to see him help lead this team to the SCF. I’d like to see him improve that faceoff % which can only help increase the puck possession for the top line. I also would want to see him reign in Ovie some and look to balance out Ovie trying to do everything himself as much. Nicky did a good job of taking more opportunities for himself this year and I only expect that to improve next year. 35-40 goals is not out of reach for him at all. 70+ assists to go along with it would be pretty much the roof I would expect on his ceiling…just slightly higher in each than this year.
As for how much he is worth…that’s a tough one. It depends on length of the contract. I’d love to get him for a cap hit of $7 mil a year or under. I think he’s worth every penny of that…and truthfully at this point I’d be happy with anything less than Ovie money. He keeps getting better, has never missed a game, and is a legit top 5 center in a league.
Everything ends badly...otherwise it wouldn't end.
Will Nicky be given the freedom to shine?
I want Nicky to rein in Ovie too, so Ovie doesn’t try to do everything himself. The question is, will the Coach and Ovie allow this? IMO this is a necessary step for Ovie to mature as a TEAM player, and what the Caps need to make more noise in the playoffs.
9+
If you had told me in October that Backstrom would play in all 82 games and finish with 68 assists, I would have been pretty happy. But I thought his ceiling was in the 80-85 helper range. Also, he basically had the same point totals on the PP as last year, which is about what I expected for this year. Those two things are pretty much the only reasons I didn’t give him a 10.
Everything else about his game improved dramatically. His chemistry and comfort level with Ovie resulted in more shots, a better shooting percentage, and more goals. He keeps improving his board play, which helps when squeezing pucks to the crease for Knuble to feast on. He really stepped up on the PK, highlighted by the now-famous 4-on-3 against the Bolts. He carried this team during Ovie’s short absences, and to criticize him for the team’s playoff failures isn’t fair, he was basically the same performer in those seven games as we was during the regular season. BB even gave him an “A” when Poti had to miss game seven, which I think points to him becoming a leader in the locker room. Keep up the good work, and I won’t care if my girlfriend, sister, mother, future wife and/or daughter(s) love to wear his hockey jersey.
That said, the bar is even higher now. I think 40/80/120, fewer PIMs, more PK time and a better FO% would qualify for a 10 next season.
faceoffs
I gave Nicky a 10 and loved his performance this season, but…a little-noticed yet serious problem with the Caps’ PP in the closing weeks of the season and, alas, in the playoffs against MTL was NB’s seeming inability to win an offensive zone face-off. Sure, he won a couple, but they were the exceptions. This not only deprived the Caps of serious offensive zone time (since opponents invariably quickly cleared the puck killing another 15-20 seconds), but also meant that OV rarely got to unleash his patented wrister off the NB kick face-off win. If NB works on one thing over the summer, I hope it’s his face-off technique.
10
I probably should’ve given him a 9, but too late for that. Nicky was an absolute beast this season. I’ve always had high expectations from him, but wow. What a great player we’ve got in him. He definitely exceeded my expectations.
Rink Rabbit & newest member of TySlo's fan club.
10
His year was the very definition of a 10. A perfect season for a guy his age, with his potential, draft position etc.. He was awesome.
As a guy who has run or analyzed a bhzillion consumer, employee etc surveys over the years, I’m (still) amused (bemused?) that people refuse to use the whole scale. The result is that when results are aggregated they are almost always in the form of “top 2 boxes” or “bottom 3 boxes” b/c no matter how many choices you give people, they tend to constrain themselves to a relatively small band. Looking at Nick’s vs. Karl’s scores makes that point nicely.
The result is that when results are aggregated they are almost always in the form of "top 2 boxes" or "bottom 3 boxes" b/c no matter how many choices you give people, they tend to constrain themselves to a relatively small band. Looking at Nick’s vs. Karl’s scores makes that point nicely.
What?
I waited all year for this?
yeah, what? I see a bell curve, standard deviation. Backstroms defying the idea of curve right now; to correct that we’d need to add an 11. Then we’d see those fringe votes come into play a little more.
by The Jade Donkey on May 4, 2010 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Can we get it louder?

4th Floor, is next, swimvare, undervare, Eric Fehr...
by JSchon on May 4, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
why in the world should player ratings have a gaussian distribution? There ought to be skewness, as there clearly is w/ Nicky but strangely isn’t with Karl. I’d submit that’s because respondents refuse to use the entire scale (here lopping off the bottom end). Respondent “refusal” to use the entire scale is endemic to surveying.
Why shouldn’t there be a normal distribution in the voting? Most people are going to evaluate a player around the same level so there is going to be heavy clustering around some mean level (and this mean level will vary between players) with thinner densities as you move away in either direction. The only reason Backstrom’s voting is skewed is because the scale doesn’t go past 10. People aren’t “refusing” to vote for the bottom scores because they are ignoring the bottom end of the scale – they are voting at the top because Backstrom is fucking awesome and passed expectations this year.
As we get through more of the wraps I am very confident that you will see many players who’s mean score is at the middle of the scale or the bottom scale, and we’ll see that people are perfectly willing to use any score on the scale when appropriate.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 5, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
this makes no sense. you get skewness exactly because what your measure “clusters” somewhere out to the right or left.
You may be confident, but history says you’re wrong.
Right, people cluster somewhere, but outside of those clusters some people like the player more, and some people like the player less. But those who are outside of the main cluster are fairly evenly split between people outside on the high and low ends, hence the normal distribution.
Having skewness would imply that there is one main cluster, but almost everyone outside of that cluster are on one side (i.e. everyone outside the main cluster is either more down or more supportive of a player), leaving one main bulge with a lopsided tail in one direction and not the other.
You can “cite” your history all you want, but I’d love to hear a theory as to why this voting should not display a normal distribution.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 5, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
His year was the very definition of a 10. A perfect season for a guy his age, with his potential, draft position etc.. He was awesome.
Maybe that’s why everyone is voting 8-10.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on May 5, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
9 (didn't have a complete reading failure this time)
Off the chart expectations and playoffs nix a ten.
that sentence will repeat, losing in the first round makes it hard to give a ten to anyone
never let the truth get in the way of a good story
I’ve been in total depression since the end of game seven. Watching that video gave me hope for next season. Come’on October!
by blokeyhighlander on May 5, 2010 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions
“It hit me in the pants, it felt good. Why? I wanted to win.”
Caps Snaps - Washington Capitals Photography
Founder of the Eric Fehr Fan Club.
Honestly, as a Pens fan, I thought Backstrom was phenomenal this season. Him and Ovie together remind me of Sid and Geno. Definitely got some firepower in the old tank.
Glorious
by Presidentjlh on May 5, 2010 2:13 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
To get a 10 from me next season -
30-75-105, 15+PPG, <40 PIM, 51%+ on the dot, continue to lead the team in takeaways, top 2 in takeaway/giveaway ratio for WAS forwards.
To get a 5 he’d have to post the same stats as this year — he’s improving, every year for the next 3-4 should get better and each year should constitute a new baseline for the following year.
He’s right there with what I had last year, a notch below on the non-scoring marks — 9.
Next year, a 5 is a little regression to the mean, 28-62-90, 50 PIM, 49.5% FO;
a 10 would be 35-75-110, <40 PIM, 51% FO, Selke nomination-type defense
-d
I rated Backstrom a 9. I had high expectations and I feel Backstrom over-performed. Lots of goals, lots of assists, slight up tick in faceoff , and becoming an elite playmaker. Not much more you can ask from him. For a 10? A Ross trophy, 40 goals, 80 assists, ~55 FO%. That’s a tall order but my expectations for Backstrom next season will be high.




































