2009-10 Rink Wrap: Alex Ovechkin
From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up, Alex Ovechkin.
Key Stats: Ovechkin led the League in points- and goals-per-game and goals created (despite missing ten games; stat explained here), had the best plus-minus rating among NHL forwards and led the Caps to the best record in the NHL.
Interesting Stat: Ovechkin took 30.3% fewer shots in 2009-10 than he did in 2008-09, but only scored 10.7% fewer goals.
The Good: With his second-consecutive 50/50 campaign, Ovechkin joined Wayne Gretzky, Mario Lemieux and Mike Bossy as the only players in NHL history to top 250 goals and 250 assists in their first five years in the League. He started the season like a house afire - with three consecutive three-point games - and by the time the dust settled on the 82-game campaign, he led the League in multi-point games, even-strength, road and empty net goals, and non-division goals and points, and led the Caps in power-play, home, first and game-winning tallies. Ovechkin's five-on-five Corsi was spectacular and his goals-per-sixty at five-aside other-worldly. He also finished 19th among NHL forwards in hits, and no one in front of him played fewer games other than Chris Neil (needless to say, no one within spitting distance in front or behind AO finished anywhere near him in points).
As nice as those numbers are, Ovechkin's 2009-10 season was about his growth as a player and a leader. Ovechkin set a career-best in points-per-game (1.51), bettered his plus-minus by 37 over 2008-09, and had the ninth-best goals against per sixty at five-on-five in the League among forwards with 12 minutes of ice time per game (he was third in goals for). And, of course, back on January 5, Ovechkin was named the 14th captain in team history. Under AO's leadership, the Caps closed out the season with a scorching 30-4-7 mark after he got the "C," which included a franchise-record 14-game win streak just prior to the Olympic break. Simply put, he was the most valuable skater in hockey during the regular season.
Then came the playoffs, where Ovechkin improved on his regular season goal-per-game rate (bet you haven't read that stat in too many mainstream articles) for the second-consecutive season, and led the Caps with five goals, five assists and ten points in seven games - he was hardly "neutralized." For all of the talk of Ovechkin's supposed playoff struggles in the Canadiens series, his 14.7 shooting percentage was higher than any single season or playoffs in his NHL career. Needless to say, that's only counting shots that made it all the way to the goal, but contrary to what your eyes (and hockey analysts) might have told you, AO's per-game shots on goal were down just a quarter of a shot (or less than 5%) per game.
Given the above, it's no surprise that Ovechkin is a Hart Trophy finalist for the third-consecutive season.
The Bad: Despite the mountain of positives piled up above, 2009-10 was a tough season for Alex Ovechkin. He was ejected from games and/or received supplementary discipline from the League for four different hits (a slew foot on Rich Peverley for which he was fined, a board on Patrick Kaleta for which he was ejected, a knee-on-knee hit on Tim Gleason for which he was ejected and suspended two games, and a board on Brian Campbell for which he was ejected and suspended two games); the Russian Machine did, in fact, break for the first time, as a shoulder injury sidelined him for six games; his Olympics were a disappointment on and off the ice, which were nothing compared to the disappointment of leading the Presidents' Trophy winner to a 3-1 first round series lead before watching the series slip away; and most recently Russia's loss at the World Championships provided a little extra salt in the wound before Ovechkin could finally call it a season. In the span of less than a year, Ovechkin went (unfairly) from media darling to whipping boy; from rugged MVP to dirty choker. It has to have taken a toll, and it seemed to in his game - from February 8 until the last week of the season, Ovechkin scored goals in just three of 18 games and just wasn't quite right.
Digging a little deeper, Ovechkin skated the longest shifts in the League, saw his power-play production drop a bit, and... well, there really isn't much else wrong with what AO did during the regular season. But the playoffs were a different story. Sure, the numbers in aggregate look fine. And there's really nothing too upsetting about a 0-shot performance in Game 1, so long as it's followed with a bounce-back game (or three). And it was.
But in the first ten minutes of Game 5, when the Caps had the Canadiens down 3-1 and entering one of the loudest arenas in hockey, Alex Ovechkin, the lead-by-example captain, was, to put it mildly, indifferent to the defensive side of the game. And it cost his team twice. Instead of killer instinct, the only thing that died that night was the Caps' momentum, and Ovechkin would finish the series with just one goal and one assists over the last three games. Throw in an appropriate share of culpability for the teams dreadful postseason power-play, and those ten points are tempered quite a bit... and so is Alex Ovechkin's 2009-10 season.
The Vote: Rate Ovechkin below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
The Discussion: What would you like to see Ovechkin improve on in 2010-11? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
134 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
5
Score 50 goals, MVP consideration, this is all standard Ovie. We expect this now.
70 goals or Conn Smythe’s the only way for him to get 10s.
"Yes, but Rimmer Directive 271 states just as clearly, 'No chance you metal ba****d.'"
Score 50 goals, MVP consideration, this is all standard Ovie. We expect this now.
That’s where I started with it, and J.P.’s paragraph gave me the rationalization to knock it down to a 4.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Yup. Same here.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 28, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
no additional consideration for highest PPG totals of his career or dramaticall improved +/-?
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on May 28, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I like that he’s rounding his game out more, but I think that was a bit more noticeable (for me, anyway) from ‘07-08 to ’08-’09. We can pencil him in for 50-55-105 and 10 points a playoff series now.
The fact of the matter is that if the team had his “personality, and the energy, passion and drive to win”, then we’re maybe not talking about tee times right now.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Rate Ovechkin below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season – if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
I never travel far....without a little Big Star...
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on May 28, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
3
I had very high expectations for AO this year. 60 goals, a Richard and a Hart, continued maturation (hopefully to be reflected in shorter shifts, among other things), and leadership of a deep playoff run. 50 goals, no Richard, likely no Hart, continued looooooong shifts, continued 1 on 4 rushes, and a playoff fizzle…very disappointing season for him.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Nobody’s worked harder for less this year than Alex Ovechkin.
by EmilyB on May 28, 2010 11:31 AM EDT reply actions 12 recs
4
Maybe unfairly, but my expectations of Ovie have less to do with personal statistics and glory than with team success. He had a great regular season, and that is what I expect. Unfortunately, the greatest player in the world needs to be able to will his team to one win in the final three against an 8th seed.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
One person can’t “will” a team anywhere. As great as he is, Alex needs Bax and Crew to also step it up so he’s not trying to carry 20k hopes and dreams on his back alone.
Look at me, Dustin! I'm a F%^king Icon!
As great as he is, Alex needs Bax and Crew to also step it up so he’s not trying to carry 20k hopes and dreams on his back alone.
Well his hallmarks of “energy, passion and drive to win” are the team’s as well, so maybe more of it is on him than last year.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I disagree with that. I don’t mean that he should be the only one performing and he needs to will the team past a better opponent for 4 games. But we have all seen him carry the team to victory. I don’t think that it is unfair for me to expect that in 3 games he will put together a period+ where he single handedly alters the course of the game and the series. That’s what the world’s best players do, right?
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
I don’t think that it is unfair for me to expect that in 3 games he will put together a period+ where he single handedly alters the course of the game and the series.just one game or one period where AO put the team on his back--a regular occurrence during the regular season--and the caps would've advanced. his numbers weren't bad, but none of the vintage AO from past postseasons.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
SBN has a glitch where if you type “true.” as the first word/sentence of a response it disappears. this has happened to me like 5 times yet i still forget.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe unfairly, but my expectations of Ovie have less to do with personal statistics and glory than with team success.
a little less unfair in my book now that he’s captain. this has always been AO’s team, but the C bears that extra responsibility. if the C gets to carry the cup first, he also has to be first to answer after a disappointing elimination.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
6. He did what I expected of him (around 50 and 50, I’d say) and managed to improve statistics we maybe didn’t expect him to improve (+/- and PlayerGA/60), and Captained his way to a Presidents’ Trophy. That gets him an 8 or a 9 from me. For about 20 games, though (Olympics and Playoffs incl.), he was a completely different player, and that knocks him down. I just hope he can figure out why and not let it happen, again.
by DrinkingPartner on May 28, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions
What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
He’s the captain. A Stanley Cup.
Anything less, it can’t be a 10, even if he scores 93 goals, gets 216 points, and goes plus-125.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on May 28, 2010 11:39 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Needless to say, I could not disagree with this statement any harder.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on May 28, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
6. he did what i expected in the regular season, but did it in fewer games and did it with the unexpected addition of the C on his chest.
next year, clearly a stanley cup gets him a 10. he can clearly improve his two way play and be better at picking his spots when being physical. shorter shifts and not playing 25 minutes in meaningless end of season games.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
4
I originally intended to give him a 5, but like BP said, JP’s final paragraph put things in perspective.
That being said, he was better offensively than I expected. He would have had the best offensive season of his career if it weren’t for his injuries, and the Hart Trophy wouldn’t even be a discussion. His playoffs were disappointing in that he sputtered out at the end of the series, but I was happy that he didn’t start slow, as he’s tended to do in years past.
I would still like to see him improve defensively. While he’ll never win the Selke, he has the potential to be a great two-way forward, not just a great power forward.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 28, 2010 11:44 AM EDT reply actions
6
Regular season if he didn’t miss games would get an 8 from me. Missing games, no Ross or Richard gets a 7. Playoffs make it a 6. In retrospect, should have been a 5.
What would you like to see Ovechkin improve on in 2010-11? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
Seriously, a Cup and 55 goals-120 points (Ross and Richard) in the regular season and a solid playoffs will get a 10. Nothing less.
Improvements? Getting on the PK and skating shorter shifts is all I can think of.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
I don’t think I care if he takes PK time or not. I don’t particularly want him blocking shots. Ever.
by DrinkingPartner on May 28, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I want him to have some. Not be a significant penalty killer, but more than 5 secs per game or whatever he got this season. I’d like 30 seconds to a minute per game. I feel like it’s the next step, in a way. There’s not much to improve on really, unless he shifts to center or D or G.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 28, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Can I ask why the unchanged rating? (Been reading a lot of last year’s Wrap)
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
haha i’m off duty today. (and have been for a while now with comps coming up.) keep it up.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
He improved his regular season game leaps and bounds, at least on paper, but the playoff exit was a lot more shameful. Again, in hindsight, I should’ve given him the lower end of “what I expected,” which itself is kind of misleading. I expected more in some facets, and less in others. I guess it roughly balances out. I mean, I can’t ignore how well the team responded with him as captain in the regular season.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 28, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough. If anything, how the team responded with him as captain in the playoffs was where my mind was at.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Like F&B said elsewhere, I can’t blame it all on him. For the stars who “underperformed,” like Semin, I can, but AO had a pretty solid playoffs on the whole, I thought. He can’t go g+a/gm for every playoff series, and I think especially with him he did more than he should have had to.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 28, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
The Conn Smythe would earn him a 10.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 28, 2010 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
7
Produced great numbers through less games, stepped it up and became the C and all in all played well. All the suspension were garbage that played to the media narrative instead of having any grounding in reality.
10 next year? Echoing Ghost of Bebop. Conn Smythe or bust.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
6
He did what i expected him to do. (with an extra point added for the missed games)
I've often thought of becoming a golf club
6
Pretty much what I expected. Could have been a 5 but I gave him the benefit of the doubt. He showed up in the playoffs, he showed up in big games. The team failures cannot be attributed to him. Sure, he’s the best player and Captain, but there is only so much he can do. This notion of Captains lifting teams on their shoulders, dragging them to victory singlehandedly, is vastly overblown. How much could AO have done to make Semin score? What could AO have done about Flash being terrible but still getting a jersey? Or Mike Green getting so lost in his own head that he forgot what makes him great? At some point you need your teammates to step up and help you out, and I don’t think AO got enough of that this year, so he gets to keep the 6.
For a 10 next year he’ll need 70+ goals or 120+ points without any suspensions or prolonged scoring droughts (like after the Olympics).
What do I want to see him improve? First, shorter shifts. I know it’s on BB but some of it comes from AO. They both need to cut down his shift length. Second, play closer to the net and use his teammates more; specifically I’d prefer to see someone other than AO carrying the puck up ice (and if Knuble is the RW on that line it leaves one option…). I don’t want to see him leading a rush up ice without any support. It works sometimes but teams have seen it too much and he’s not as effective doing it as he was the first 3 years. It would help if BB would move him to LW on the PP instead of the point, but I just don’t see it happening. BB is going to convince himself that having the best PP in the regular season is enough, and bring the same strategy.
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on May 28, 2010 12:18 PM EDT reply actions 10 recs
How much could AO have done to make Semin score? What could AO have done about Flash being terrible but still getting a jersey? Or Mike Green getting so lost in his own head that he forgot what makes him great?
he could’ve elevated his game to make up for it, since that’s exactly what he did last year when green and flash were invisible.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Then came the playoffs, where Ovechkin improved on his regular season goal-per-game rate (bet you haven’t read that stat in too many mainstream articles) for the second-consecutive season, and led the Caps with five goals, five assists and ten points in seven games
So by “elevated his game” you mean “elevated his game even more than he already did.”
I waited all year for this?
by Rob Parker on May 28, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
if AO had been the player he was during the 2008-2009 playoffs, the team would have advanced. and that doesn’t include just raw point totals (though AO did underperform his 08-09 scoring rate, also).
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
So aside from looking at raw scoring what weren’t you seeing? He was getting dangerous chances all series, he had a goal called off in game 7, he was the best Caps forward again. Baxter made it a little closer this year, but I don’t see what he wasn’t doing. I see a difference in production because they played a stingier defensive team with a much hotter goalie. We won the Rags series, but AO didn’t score at the same rate and probably wouldn’t qualify for your standard of “elevating his game.” We lost the Pens series despite AO scoring 2 points a game.
I waited all year for this?
So aside from looking at raw scoring what weren’t you seeing?
how’s this for a “where have i heard that before”: consistency.
ovechkin, 2nd in points and 2nd in plus-minus during the regular season, scored just 2 points and logged a minus-2 through the last three games of the montreal series. when AO went into the tank, so did the team. i don’t blame AO one iota for last year’s elimination, seeing as he and varly were the only two players to show up. ovechkin was a +10 in last year’s playoffs, backstrom was a +3. ovechkin was a +5 in this year’s playoffs, backstrom was a +7. there wasn’t a game this postseason i thought “we wouldn’t have won that game without ovechkin,” and his numbers suddenly dipped during the last three games of the series with a chance to close it out.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s all raw scoring. Plus/minus is intimately tied to raw scoring, so it’s not really looking at anything different. We all know he didn’t score enough in those games. My point is that he was still playing good hockey. If you thought AO actually “went into the tank” then OK. There’s nothing I can say to that. But I thought the line created great chances every game and if Halak doesn’t stop like 140 of 143 shots over 3 games nobody is talking about AO going “into the tank” or not showing up or anything else. There were definitely players that didn’t perform. There were definitely coaching and personnel errors. I don’t think either applies to AO or Backstrom. They are the two key guys that I actually thought brought us what we needed.
I waited all year for this?
plus-minus isn’t raw scoring. moreover, much of AO’s raw scoring happens on the power play and doesn’t show up in plus-minus, which obviously wasn’t the case in the postseason.
we can disagree about his overall performance, i guess. i thought game 7 was a pretty average performance, after a mediocre game 5 and a mediocre game 6. he definitely wasn’t his playoff self.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
No, plus/minus isn’t raw scoring, but raw scoring is the data you used to determine plus/minus. Once you know a guy wasn’t scoring, what else does plus/minus really tell you?
So “his playoff self” means what exactly? He scores 2 points a game or the Caps win? Raising his points production from the regular season (despite facing much tougher defense and goaltending) and being the best player on the team isn’t “his playoff self?”
I waited all year for this?
give me backstrom as the best player on the caps team through those 7 games.
and well…i’m sure you know this, but plus-minus also indicates how many goals have been scored against you. AO finished 1st on the team in plus-minus last postseason. AO finished 4th on the team in plus-minus this postseason.
again, it’s not accurate to cite “2 goals a game” when he scored a combined 8 points in 3 games and a combined 2 points in the other four. his “playoff self” is consistency, and consistency is my issue—along with the plus-minus, the PP ineptitude, and the lack of a “holy crap AO just took over” game.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
The Pens series is the only series where AO wasn’t quiet for at least 2-3 games.
Thanks for the plus/minus clarification. What was the engine that drove AO to his incredible plus/minus this year?
I waited all year for this?
What was the engine that drove AO to his incredible plus/minus this year?
why, a combination of points scored and points allowed. you’re welcome. :)
i guess his 110 points last year and his 109 points last year should’ve resulted in a similar plus-minus, right? (and not +8 to +45). seriously, it’s just one stat but it’s valid as a separate reference point from points/goals.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
But he wasn’t on ice for a ton of goals against. He was on ice for a small number against, like the regular season. But without prolific scoring he didn’t have the great plus/minus, that’s common sense. He wasn’t worse defensively, he just didn’t compensate with the scoring.
I waited all year for this?
But without prolific scoring he didn’t have the great plus/minus, that’s common sense.
it’s not common sense that his linemate, backstrom, would have even fewer points and a better plus-minus (during the series and also during those 3 games).
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
that his plus-minus could have been better than it was. separate from his points/goals, which also could have been better.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I think in his +/- you see BB’s playing AO a ton. At least that’s what my intuition tells me, that double-shifting AO means he gets on with lesser linemates = more goals against, in addition to longer shifts.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 29, 2010 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Rather, fewer goals for.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 29, 2010 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m fairly sure Gordon-Knuble were the forwards on one, or even both, of the shorties.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 29, 2010 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions
The issue that I’m taking is that when the team needed him to be the best player in the world and come up with a “break nose, score 4 goals” game, he didn’t. Semin sucked, Flash played himself out of a contract, Green was MIA, BB didn’t adjust. Yes! I don’t blame Alex for that, but Ovie wasn’t there for the last 3 games either. The team was bad, but I expect Ovie to be the player that overcomes all of that, at least for 1 period in a game.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
Ovie wasn’t there for the last 3 games either.
I fundamentally disagree with this.
I waited all year for this?
How so?
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
I thought basically every shift AO and Backstrom took the Caps dominated. They had quality scoring chances all game long and if not for some alleged skate interference they tied game 7. I’m sensitive to the “we just ran into a hot goalie” defense when BB and GMGM make it because they are ignoring some serious flaws that could have (should have) been addressed, but I think it really does apply to AO and Baxter. Did AO try to do it too much by himself on occasion? Probably, but that’s not new. You can’t just expect him to completely change his game at that point. Game 5 you can blame him for coming out flat, but games 6 and 7 that line dominated. They just didn’t score like we’re used to seeing.
I waited all year for this?
I’m sensitive to the "we just ran into a hot goalie" defense when BB and GMGM make it because they are ignoring some serious flaws that could have (should have) been addressed, but I think it really does apply to AO and Baxter.
and through the first two games against lundqvist last season, we said the same thing. but then AO scored 3 goals in 4 games, and team righted ship. i’ve come to expect ovechkin to overcome hot goalies, trap defenses, etc. i expect him to put the team on his back for at least one game in the last 3 of a series.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
AO didn’t change his approach to Hank, Hank just lost his groove. AO ddn’t change his approach to Halak, Halak just got white hot.
AO didn’t even carry us through any of the 5-7 wins against NYR. Varly got a shutout in 5. AO had one goal in a 5-3 win in 6 (Poti with 4 points, AO’s goal made it 5-1). Game 7 AO wasn’t the hero either.
Why would you expect AO to overcome traps? We are notoriously bad against traps and haven’t really seen AO overcome that. We thought the Rags were defensively conservative, but MON took it even further. Their ES strategy was essentially a 5 man PK.
I waited all year for this?
you’ll have to explain to me some time how you differentiate between a goalie losing his groove and a player breaking through. the caps ran halak in game 4 only to have him come back and be annointed king of the playoffs. it’s ovechkin’s job to find a way, and it’s something we’d come to expect.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
For one thing, the talking heads on Versus thought Lundqvist lost his groove as well. They showed graphics about how he looked Game 1 vs Game 6 (notably, glove hand in “ready” position was much lower).
Halak also played really well against PIT, although not as well as against Washington. So I guess there’s that.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 28, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
how you differentiate between a goalie losing his groove and a player breaking through.
Did you see Halak’s glove save on Corvo (or any of the others the rest of the series)? Did you see Briere score high glove in game 2? That’s Halak losing his groove. Briere didn’t do anything different; it wasn’t even a perfect shot. Halak just didn’t make the save. When the goalie is still playing white hot and you manage to score one, that’s “breaking through” I guess. So maybe the single goal we got each of games 5-7 were “finally breaking through” goals. You don’t see guys score 4 points a night when a goalie is in his groove.
And I agree with RAL that Hank lost his groove, especially regarding his glove hand. I don’t think the Caps did anything differently, he just stopped coming up with the huge saves. Halak ran out of gas too late, for Caps fans.
I waited all year for this?
i don’t buy it in respect to AO and AO’s line. i think the trap did them in far worse than halak, and i blame the players on the ice for not figuring out a way through the trap. the corvo save comes to mind of course, but i can’t think of a similar save against AO. the quality of shots wasn’t there.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions
The trap wasn’t a big problem after game 1. In game 1 they definitely tried too many stretch passes and were burned and bogged down. Sure, they could have gone to a dump and chase to counter the trap, but they didn’t have to. They shortened the passes and carried the puck a little more and got to the offensive zone. It was frustrating sometimes but except for the beginning of game 5 and the last half of the first period of game 6, they pretty much dominated zone time. They were routinely getting 35+ shots on net. A good trap lets up 25 or fewer shots in most cases. MON wasn’t playing a very good trap.
You think we didn’t get quality chances. If that’s your conclusion then there isn’t much more to say. I think we did get a lot of quality chances that normally yield several more goals; and most of those chances were from AO/Baxter’s line.
I waited all year for this?
it’s difficult to debate people’s impressions, regardless. the SOG numbers look good, and that includes AO. i like K_C’s interpretation below, but i still have to think it’s AO’s job to find a way. this was not last year, when ovechkin was putting up stupendous numbers in losses and was basically blameless.
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree to an extent. He got chances, but still definitely bears some of the blame for the O disappearing in the last 3 games (part of the reason I gave him a 4). He was far from the biggest problem offensively though.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 28, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Well said. AO wasn’t bad.
When I was coming up with my score for this I approached it this way:
If I was told on Oct 1 that the Caps would be up 3-1 against a hot goalie and a marginal team in the first round, would I expect Ovie to be the difference between winning and losing? The answer is absolutely yes. I still feel that way. If they played that scenario out 100 times the Caps win the other 99. He is the difference maker, I expect him to be able to enforce his will against whoever. Against Montreal, he didn’t make enough of a difference to win.
Beards are the zenith of manliness. First, they are scratchy and unpleasant to womenfolk. Second, they look awesome. Third, if you have something tasty for lunch, you can enjoy the smell all the way until dinnertime. - RMNB
That’s because the good saves goalies make on AO usually don’t look flashy. AO scores by powering the puck through the goalie more often than picking corners, so when he gets stopped it just looks like a routine kick save or stick save or what not. AO got plenty of his quick shots off that a lot of the time end up in goals, but Halak was able to seal off his holes quickly enough and what was actually a very tough save looked real easy.
The glove save on Corvo looked great (partially because Halak sold it with a nice and unnecessary windmill move), but it really wasn’t much tougher than several saves he made on AO and others.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 28, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
AO was definitely there in Game 6 and Game 7.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 28, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
What do I want to see him improve? First, shorter shifts. I know it’s on BB but some of it comes from AO. They both need to cut down his shift length. Second, play closer to the net and use his teammates more; specifically I’d prefer to see someone other than AO carrying the puck up ice (and if Knuble is the RW on that line it leaves one option…). I don’t want to see him leading a rush up ice without any support
We are on the same wavelength.
7
Over expectations: Captainship and the streak that followed, 50-56-109 (only 1 pt less than last year, in 7 fewer games), an incredible +45, and showed up in the playoffs more than any other player on the team.
Under Expectations: Suspensions, Injury, and post-Olympics play (though the last two were really not under his control).
Next year for a 10? A trophy he doesn’t have – Cup, Conn Smythe, Selke – in that order.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
6
Great improvement on assists and +45 is +45, no matter how you slice it.
Had to dock him for the suspensions and the slightly uneven play. What he did as captain was great but also somewhat mitigated by the first round collapse.
Slightly off topic, but do we do a Rink Wrap for BB and GM?
Choking since 1985.
Yes on the former, with a personal yes for the latter.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
He has to do a better job of getting others into the play next year during the playoffs. If they are going to shut him down on the rush, it’s time to pull up and let the trail catch up. This may be coaching that needs to figure this out as well.
Otherwise, he gave me every penny’s worth this year as a STH.
I gave him an 8, because he can and will be even better.
8
The statistics are about what I would expect on a per-game basis and that he received an injury is not a surprise, the injury bug had to catch up with him sometime. What was unexpected for me (postives first):
1) His being named captain of the team after Clark was traded, and the team taking off from that point and surging their way to the top of the standings.
2) His lead by example attitude. When the Caps fell behind to the Penguins in the Sno-vechkin game, he (and Eric Fehr) grabbed the bull by the [Balsillie]s and won the game. He did the same thing in Edmonton as well. In both games the Caps were down 2 going into the 3rd and came out with wins.
3) More goals for the highlight reel.
4) Being more of a “team guy”. He doesn’t need to lead the league in shots by a wide margin, although more shots are always welcome.
5) Now the negatives: the biggest had to be the fact that the NHL finally had to suspend him. The slew foot was bad, Kaleta was worse, and Gleason just two games later. He forced the NHLs hand, and they showed Ovi the back of it, hard. If he hadn’t been through this before, then I doubt there would have been a suspension (or perhaps not even an ejection) for Campbell. The discipline system in the NHL is pretty haphazard at best, but once you get called to the principal’s office regularly, the suspensions get heavier.
5) Sure he had 10 points in 7 games, and that followed a 14 point effort in a series against Pittsburgh in the previous season-ender. Great numbers. But the Caps lost those series, and unlike 2009, in 2010, the Caps were expected to win…no, they were expected to curb-stomp the Habs. And once again, for the 4th time in team history, the Caps lose a series after being up 3-1. Ovechkin is the captain of this team, so he has to take some of the heat for this.
No doubt he is the best player in the world, but there are some intangibles that need to be addressed. He needs to clean up his play a little. No more little nonsense shoves and hits that wipe out someone, no more loafing while on the ice when the puck is in the Caps end. He doesn’t do it a lot, but it’s often enough, and it cost the Caps dearly this season. I think know he can get that out of his game. If he does that, I’ll give him a 9 next year.
To get to 10…well, there is that silver trophy that’s going to be played for in the next 2 weeks…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
seriously, #2 and #3 were unexpected?
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Like the Spanish Inquisition, all highlight reel goals are unexpected. :)
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 28, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
So he leads by example in December and February games and it’s a positive for him, but he doesn’t in others and it’s a negative to other people?
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
If he had done what he did against Edmonton and Pittsburgh against Montreal in Games 5, 6, or 7, then the Caps move into round 2, and perhaps we’re not doing Rink Wraps already…. One or two more points in those games, and the series likely has a very different outcome.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 28, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Except that you are comparing his games against MON to a game against EDM! Even PIT isn’t a fair comparison; that was one of the worst defensive teams in the playoffs and MAF wasn’t great this year. If Halak had done what every other goalie in the NHL would have done the Caps win that series and nobody is talking about being disappointed that AO “only” scored 10 points in 7 games.
I waited all year for this?
I am not disappointed with 10 points in 7 games… that’s a terrific rate of production. What I am disappointed with is that he didn’t rally the troops in one of the last 3 games against Montreal. Admittedly, the Oilers and Pens are not good defensively, but the playoffs are a time to step up and he didn’t. It wasn’t a lack of trying, it was the lack of success that was disappointing, whatever the reason for the lack of success.
Hockey, like most sports, has a dichotomy, in that for one player/team/etc. to do well, the other must fail. Despite the fact that Halak played lights-out, Ovechkin failed to rally the team in one of those games, and yes, I expected him to do just that. He’s the captain, and he had done it before.
Montreal played great defensively in the last 3 games, no doubt, but remember, the Habs finished 20th overall in the NHL standings and had a losing record. The Caps were supposed to beat this team, and looked after Game 4 like they were going to. Then, in the last 3 games, Ovi goes 1-1-2 with a minus 2, and with 24 shots on goal. Sure Halak had a lot to do with that, but after averaging 2 points a game to start the series, he didn’t finish. And that, sadly, has been a legacy of this team since 1987. :(
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 28, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions
To earn a 10 next season:
Ovie needs to be Ovie;
5 or more bromantic moments with Nicky; and
Tell the media to kiss his ass
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
by oldemystix on May 28, 2010 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
So when they get bounced in the ECF, at least he’s done the important stuff.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 3:11 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
4
Could have gone with 5.
I have very high expectations for Ovie. Having a Hart-worthy season is something I expect. Maybe that’s unfair, but I don’t think I’m alone in thinking that. He improved greatly in two stats, +- and assists. Minus 1for the injures and suspensions, he gets a 6 for the regular season.
As the captain, he takes some responsibility for the team’s playoff performance. I admit that I don’t know what he could do, but he needs to do something. His own performance, while solid, was a small step back from his normal level. 10 points in 7 games is fine for Ovie, but not noteworthy. He was a non-factor in game 1 and had the blown defense in game 5. And no matter how hot a goalie is, over three games, Ovie is capable of scoring more than one goal.
For next year, 10 is Stanley Cup or Conn Smythe.
Waiting 'til next year.
oldemystix said it perfectly; Ovi needs to be what he is and stop listening to them stupid critics and doubters. He is the Great Eight for a reason, because he is the best.
So hopefully he can get his confidence back in order over the summer and come back in style next season.
by bwitch16 on May 28, 2010 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
this was a tough one, ultimately went with a 7
His raw points were about at expectations. He gets bonus points for leading the team as captain to a great record, his greatly improved defensive numbers, reaching the totals he reached in just 72 games, and for his play through the first 5 playoff games. He gets knocked for the suspensions and his inability to elevate himself and the rest of the team in the last 3 playoff games. Rightly or wrongly (I personally think “rightly”), a lot of the responsibility for getting the team to dig down a bit more and MAKE IT HAPPEN has to fall on the captain of the team. Not a SINGLE cap elevated his game in those final 3 games, and a fair bit of the blame for that has to fall to the captain (as well as, of course, the individual players).
The Discussion: What would you like to see Ovechkin improve on in 2010-11? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
Pretty easy questions. Cut down on the shift length, continue to improve his play without the puck, and avoiding suspensions/game misconducts are the improvements I want to see. To get a 10, he needs to do those things, lead the league in goals and points (regular season AND playoffs), and lead the team to at least an Eastern Conference Championship.
4
He did pretty much what I expected in the regular season, but he gets docked a couple of points for the suspensions, “only” getting 50 goals, and the fact that he bears at least some of the blame for the horrendous PP and lack of scoring in the last 3 games of the playoffs. I’m once again stunned by the voting. I can’t believe expectations were so low that so many people are voting 8 and up for this season.
A 10 next year involves 75+ goals, sweeping the Art Ross, Hart, Pearson and Richard again, and getting the Conn Smythe. As far as improving his game, I think I’m in agreement with everyone else that I’d like to see him make his game less predictable by entering the zone with his linemates (or better yet, letting Baxter carry it in more often) instead of leaving them in the dust and rushing in 1 on 3. Hopefully the Montreal series was a bit of an eye opener in that regard.
He can be a little smarter with his hits to avoid suspensions/injury, but I prefer the reckless AO to the more timid post-Olympics version. Really he just needs to tune out the haters and the disappointments of the past year and be himself. Then show Mike Green how to do the same.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 28, 2010 1:47 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
haters gonna hate
Sheesh. 3s? 4s? Are you people just looking at goals? Or just joking.
Having played much less games and still tying for 2nd in scoring, 6th in ASSISTS not good enough for ya? I think he did a hell of a job at finally learning how to use all the opponents attention on him to free up space to let other people score.
I went 9. I think this season was a step in the right direction for him (minus he suspensions… at least one of which was definately not deserved). Coming within 3 points of his career best minus the games he missed… He made his whole team better and he was way better than his stats indicate.
by Brainumbc on May 28, 2010 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wha? It’s relative to our expectations and lots of us have high expectations for Ovie. The 8s and up are the puzzling ones. How bad did you people expect Ovie to do?
"Yes, but Rimmer Directive 271 states just as clearly, 'No chance you metal ba****d.'"
by apk3000 on May 28, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wow, you must have had low expectations of him coming into the year.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 28, 2010 3:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
Here’s my thing. I expected something like.. oh.. 82 games.. maybe another 65 goals and 45 assists.
I think if he wanted to score 70 this season, he would have done it. I just think he spent more time becoming a better 2 way player, sacrificed the body more to get the puck more to his teammates (a byproduct of which is probably his higher assist total) and just did more this season to make his whole TEAM better as a whole, and not just for himself.
I posted a while back that there were a lot of blowout games that he seemed barely on the radar. Someone retorted with something to the effect of "that’s because the two blowout games, he was suspended or injured).. then I found about 4-5 games were we absolutely blew the opponent out of the water and he had only a couple assists during those. I think that was a good thing. I think part of the reason that so many people had career years is because Ovie started learning how to draw defenders away and how to get the puck to his teammates.
Forget the stats.. I just think a lot of Caps are starting to realize what kind of potential they really have and I credit a lot of that to Ovie. Despite his “ho-hum” 109 point season.. I think his contribution went beyond the #’s.
But that’s just my opinion. Maybe a lot of that had to do with getting the “C” and feeling like he was carrying more responsibility.
I’d have given him a 10 if it weren’t for the playoffs
Despite his "ho-hum" 109 point season.. I think his contribution went beyond the #’s.
You summed up precisely the reason why I gave him a 4.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on Jun 1, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m really surprised people were so disappointed in his season, but to each their own.
His PPG this season was a career high and I don’t even think it was the points that made him a better player this year.
My high school track coach once said the best compliment you can give an athlete is to say he/she is consistent.
8
Best production in the league, and barely losing both goals and points titles this year with 10 fewer games. Kept it exciting no? Arguably Ovechkin’s hardest playing season but the obvious drawbacks are obvious. Thrown out of big games, first hat trick in february, seeming lackadaisical attitude in important games. May of had the most GWG but it certainly didn’t seem so.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
7
His overall performance was on the high end of my expectations (I’ve probably developed low expectations as a defense mechanism), if not the high end of pre-season hopes (or hoped-for outcomes). He gets a +1 for the improvements he did make from the previous season, like increasing his shooting percentage and upping assists. Still, there are areas of his game he needs to work on, especially discipline. He can’t let the PIM get higher, nor can suspensions be repeated. If he could reduce his giveaways, even better — but this really goes along with being a little more disciplined on the ice.
Ultimately, Caps’ fans are incredibly lucky to have a player like Ovechkin on board — someone who gives the impression of near-endless potential for brilliance. He hasn’t yet maxed out his capacity and as he continnues to mature (on and off the ice, his game will be refined, assuming he is given appropriate direction and boundaries. Motivated as Ovie is, BB cannot rely on this alone to set a corrective course or polish skills. As highlighted by the overlong shifts and ‘optional’ practices, he still needs a strong coach. I really hope BB can step up his game in this area.
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
by alex_k on May 28, 2010 2:49 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
5
Knew what I was getting.
3 years ago I put this team on pace to have a Finals appearance in 4 years, the last two seasons has made me think they were a year ahead of schedule, guess not.
Great. Now I have to change my name to "Jaromir meet Alex".
by Chris meet Alex on May 28, 2010 3:01 PM EDT reply actions
7
Ovie’s biggest challenge next year will be to get his mojo back by being a physically dominating player that other teams fear. Post Campbell push Ovie was just not the same physical force that he used to be and the team needs to feed off that energy.
by Direction 87 on May 28, 2010 3:48 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Ovie’s good. But he can be better. Cindy showed more depth in his game his season, next year it would be nice for Ovie to do the same. As good as he is, there is no need for him to ‘freelance’ as much as he does. That being said, it was far from Ovie’s fault that the Cap season ended before its time …
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!
Thanks for stopping by, Scotty. Point of order though: as much as I hate Sid’s guts, he’s still a dude – Cindy he ain’t.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on May 28, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
the more i think about it, cindy as a moniker makes less and less sense. i mean, sidney is already a female name..
by Natty Bumppo on May 28, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
6
This one is tough. Because, if we’re ranking him on his season and how awesome he is, he’ll always get 8s, 9s, and 10s. But now the expectations are so high for Ovechkin, that it will take some monumental efforts for him to get anywhere close to that. But, it is what it is.
I gave him a 6 (high end of meeting expectations) for the following reasons: His points were right in line with what you would expect; his play was, more or less, right where you would expect it to be; his playoff performance was right where you would expect it to be; and had that GTG of his in game 7 not been waived off due to some serious bs, this is a whole different narrative right now. He took over the C, and the team took off afterwards…was it his doing or not? I dunno, but you can definately make a case that it showed leadership. He went ice cold late in the Habs series…along with everyone else…but again, his goal is allowed to stand in game 7, who knows what happens. At least he was still threatening.
All in all, he gave us exactly what we expected out of him, with a slight bump for taking on the C, and not skipping a beat.
And I’ll have to agree with those above: a 10 will be earned with a Cup and/or Conn Smythe. Or maybe if he puts up some Gretzky kinds of numbers…obscene.
This is where we hold them! This is where we fight! This is where they die! Remember this day, men, for it will be yours for all time.
by ZeroIndulgence on May 28, 2010 5:29 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree we overcame the neutral zone trap but we weren’t much good in the offensive zone. Halak could see where the shots were coming from. We looked too desperate flinging the puck from everywhere. i would like to have seen OV find Knuble more often. I think Backster was seriously effected by his game 3 shoulder seperation causing OV to go solo too much, forgetting that he still had a healthy Knuble to work with. Give Montreal D credit. They smothered us and the shot blocks were ridiculous.
5, because nothing about his season surprised me.
Don't celebration when you score goal
by Big Boutros on May 28, 2010 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
7 – I thought Ovechkin had a strong year. While he has put up higher goal totals before, I felt his game shifted more to a playmaker than just a pure goal scorer. The improvement of Backstrom and the acquisition of Knuble certainly helped. On many occassions when in years past Ovechkin would have shot he was looking for Knuble and Backstrom. To me this is growth. What kept him from higher rating was the major penalities and the sputter in the last two games of the Montreal series. For a 10 – similar scoring stats and leading the team to a Stanley Cup.
Hey JP,
The Boss liked your Ovi Wrap.
"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."
by bagace on May 29, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I don't follow Ted's Take religiously.
But as a Nats fan, I will always admire the contrast between’s Ted’s responsiveness and awareness of his product and the passion that his fan’s have, and the Nats seeming desperation to be pennywise and pound foolish when it comes to building a fan base.
I’ve wanted there to be more cross-pollination between all of the DC franchises. I’ve felt that the Nats are the more worthy than the Snyderskins and the Wizards (which in many ways can be a Caps competitor before Ted bought the team). But ownership is so superior for the Caps that they must be a magnet for fans from other sports before other sports can truly hope to attract Caps fans.
Certainly, Ted and his stewardship are one reason that the Caps have won a large portion of my heart and soul over the past 18 montsh.
Ian Desmond...because the future starts now for the Washington Nationals.
by souldrummer on May 29, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
The current group of Caps, under Ted’s stewardship, certainly did win my heart. For most of my life, I was always more of a baseball fan than a hockey fan, although I did usually pay attention to how my favorite hockey teams (i.e. Caps and St. Louis Blues) were doing.
Rocking the Red since 1975
It will take more travelling along the hockey road for it to overtake baseball in my heart. (Un)Thankfully the sports don’t really overlap (especially with the Caps playoff disappointment and the Nats futility. Come winter, though, I will be far more interested in the Caps than whatever new bag of good the Wizards try to sell me. The NBA has sold its soul and college basketball is a very flawed replacement for a minor league system with integrity. Football is okay for me, but I’m not comfortable with the way that football is starting to dominate the calendar too much and occupy space with its offseason that could be better spent on other sports.
Ian Desmond...because the future starts now for the Washington Nationals.
by souldrummer on May 31, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions
First line
I thought this article was fair and balanced.
One small smelling mistake off…
I waited all year for this?
You would edit it to say:
“I thought this article was fehr and balanced.”
Rocking the Red since 1975
Facepalm
(yes, but kind of obvious?)
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
(note name change)
by red army line on May 29, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions







































