Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

2009-10 Rink Wrap: Tomas Fleischmann

From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up, Tomas Fleischmann.


Tomas Fleischmann

#14 / Right Wing / Washington Capitals

6-1

190

May 16, 1984

5

$725,000 cap hit in 2009-10; RFA after 2009-10 season

5.42 rating

4.14 rating



2009-10 StatsGPGAP+/-PIMPPGPPAGWGSOGPCTTOI/G
Regular Season 69 23 28 51 9
28
7 13 4
121 19.0 16:02
Playoffs 6 0
1 1
-1
6
0
0
0
8
0.0 13:01

Key Stats: For the fourth consecutive season, Fleischmann improved upon his regular season goal and point totals and per-game rates, but has just three goals and two assists in 22 career NHL playoff games.

Interesting Stat: Fleischmann scored eight goals in the ten games Alex Ovechkin missed this season and just 15 in the other 65 games he played, including the playoffs.

The Good: Fleischmann missed the first 11 games of the season while recovering from a blood clot in his leg, but came on strong in his return, totaling 17 goals and 14 assists in his first 46 games (that's a 30-goal/73-point season pace), including points in nine-straight games (second-longest streak on the team for the season) beginning with his second game back. Despite missing so much time, Fleischmann easily set new personal bests in goals, assists and points, and his plus-nine rating marked the first time in his career he ended up on the right side of zero in that metric. He was particularly effective on the power-play, registering the second highest points-per-sixty at 5-on-5 on the team, trailing only Nicklas Backstrom. Flash also demonstrated some versatility by playing adequately at times at center and was one of three Cap forwards to average more than one minute of ice time per game on each special teams unit (1:10 shorthanded, 2:32 on the power play).

The Bad: Fleischmann's playoffs went about as poorly as could be imagined, as he saw his ice time gradually reduced before finally being healthy-scratched for Game 7 in favor of Scott Walker. As bad as his performance was in those six games, however, it didn't exactly come out of nowhere - Fleischmann had just three goals and one assist in his last 13 games of the regular season, which are the same totals he had in his 14 playoff games a season ago. Looking a bit more broadly at the trend, Fleischmann now has 24 goals and 70 points in 106 career games from December through February and 15 goals and 27 points in 91 career games from March through May. It would seem as though Tomas Fleischmann's body is not prepared to play a full season of productive hockey at the NHL level.

Back to 2009-10 specifics, the 25-year-old Czech had the worst 5-on-5 Corsi rating and goals-against-on-ice-per-sixty (GAON/60) of any forward that spent the entire season on the team and the worst 5-on-5 penalty plus-minus (penalties drawn minus penalties taken) of any skater who played at least half of the team's games other than John Erskine. Fleischmann was also arguably the team's worst penalty-killing forward, considering his GAON/60 at 4-on-5 and the quality of competition and teammates contributing to that number. Lastly, Flash only won 43.1% of his face-offs, rendering him largely unplayable at center.

The Vote: Rate Fleischmann below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.

The Discussion: As a restricted free agent, how much (in dollars and years) should the Caps be willing to commit to Fleischmann this summer? Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?

Poll
How do you rate Tomas Fleischmann's 2009-10 season?
10
5 votes
9
9 votes
8
35 votes
7
138 votes
6
228 votes
5
251 votes
4
227 votes
3
136 votes
2
32 votes
1
40 votes

1101 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 228 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Japers' Rink

Wednesday Caps Clips

May 2012 by J.P. - 723 comments

The Noon Number

Feb 2012 by J.P. - 12 comments

Monday Caps Clips: Back to Work

Dec 2011 by EmilyB - 286 comments

Capitals Finding a Balance

Oct 2011 by Becca H - 26 comments

Wednesday Caps Clips: Poetic Justice

Oct 2011 by J.P. - 315 comments

Comments

Display:

Flash is looking a lil Crosby-ish in that photo.

"My face is my mask."

by Jake Shapiro on May 14, 2010 11:03 AM EDT reply actions  

hmm, this will not be as easy as i thought it might. wonder if he’ll exceed his 07-08 rating.

BTW, what’s the lowest recored rink wrap average? i’m guessing you weren’t doing this when jagr was here….

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 11:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Here are the two previous Wrap results:

2007-08:

2008-09:

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

ah nyls. i know he’s not going to be wrapped cause he didnt play any games this year. but he would get a 10 from me for agreeing to go away finally. i expected that albatross to be around our neck all year.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not that he didn’t want to go away, it’s that there wasn’t an optimal solution. And even if he did reject plans to go to other teams, it’s not like he was bitching the team out in the media. For the situation he was in, he handled it with fucking amazing class.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Any chance we could see the standard deviation on each, too? I feel like that could be at least somewhat interesting.

by cajuncook on May 14, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

They’re all here. Go for it.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

He put up the points I expected, but was pretty much significantly worse everywhere else. He loses some points on that. And he loses points because of his playoff disappearance. And he loses a point for that terrifying picture. 2.

But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.

by Steckel Me Elmo on May 14, 2010 11:08 AM EDT reply actions  

And he loses a point for that terrifying picture. 2.

It is a rotten picture. I know J.P. does that on purpose.

And yet I gave him a 6, because that strong comeback was more than I expected, and the willingness to try (and moderate competence at) a new position was more than I expected. Plus it’s difficult for me to blame Flash for being played too much and in too many games.

by CapitalCentre on May 14, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s the picture I used for my great Office Space joke!

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was thinking about that. I expect him to suck in the playoffs, and he was even benched, so maybe I shouuld have given him a 10 instead for royally exceeding these expectations…

by Icebat on May 17, 2010 2:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

These are going to be all over the board. Tough to say that someone who hits 50 points for the first time underperformed, but there was just so little improvement in most aspects of his game that it was pretty disappointing. I gave him a 4.

by psuscott1 on May 14, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

to me, the issue is two seasons in a row now he’s started off very hot and then ends up more invisible than Crosby in Game 7 vs. the Habs around March. we said Bradley’s point production tends to come in bunches; the bulk of Flashes points seemed to all come in one very (VERY) good stretch of play.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 14, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Flash, as a failed corporate logo: There when you need him least.

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

And furthermore, he hasn’t learned and improved that aspect of his game. Ugh.

Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink

by red army line on May 14, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep. and last year I was willing to cut him a little slack, what with pneumonia mid-season and all. but this season? I’m under the impression that he should have been able to work on his conditioning and stamina. He missed time because he was on blood thinners and there was legit concern that he could get cut and bleed profusely, NOT because he was too sick or injured to run 5 miles a day.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 14, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gave him a 4 for the reasons posted by psu and birdie.

(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)

by oldemystix on May 14, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually really like Flash, and used to be a hater.
He really does have a great skill set that on most teams could be a very solid 2nd-line LW, and even a first-liner on weaker teams.
All of that said, I think Flash needs to be parlayed into assets we need more of, namely, character players who may not be present for the same months Flash is great, but come up big in the springtime.

by marks4java on May 14, 2010 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Gave him a six for looking, well, like the player Bruce thinks he is early on. Didn’t knock him for the playoffs because as mentioned, Flash played pretty much as expected in the playoffs. I guess Flash should see a raise to 1.5 million or so, but whether the Caps should be the ones paying it is a different matter, because trying to fit all of the expected pieces is getting harder. I guess it depends on what they do with Semin.

"Yes, but Rimmer Directive 271 states just as clearly, 'No chance you metal ba****d.'"

by apk3000 on May 14, 2010 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

I gave him a 6 for the regular season, and a 2 for the playoffs, so he gets a 4. As bad as he was, I honestly can’t say I expected a whole lot more. I wanted more, but expected…? No.

by DrinkingPartner on May 14, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

On board with you 100%, he was ever so slightly better than expectations during the regular season, became floaty mcfloatyfloat during the playoffs. He sort of met expectations but the playoffs were just so atrocious that you have to knock the hell out of the 6 to make you feel better.

For me to give him a 10 next season, he has to be playing for another team. If he scores 82 goals next year, I’ll give him a 9. There’s simply no way I can be happy with him at all. He’s Nylander and just doesn’t fit with the Capitals any longer.

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 14, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

He gets a 2 from me. And only because he started out strongly, and faded like a tired racehorse down the stretch.

But I blame it more on the coaching staff for throwing him out there continually. With the guy coming off an injury as severe as his was, why was he playing so much? He just got gassed as the season went on.

I never travel far....without a little Big Star...

Ron and Fez 11 to 3

by YvonLabresMoustache on May 14, 2010 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

He gets a 2 from me. And only because he started out strongly, and predictably faded like a tired racehorse down the stretch yet again.

FTFY

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Which again, goes to Coaching.

If you have a guy you KNOW fades down the stretch every year, why is he playing big minutes the entire season and every single game?

I never travel far....without a little Big Star...

Ron and Fez 11 to 3

by YvonLabresMoustache on May 14, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who are you going to give the minutes to? Some underperformer like Eric Fehr? Pshaw!

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 14, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

And on top of that, expect the guy to convert successfully to a position he hasn’t played since Junior!!

I never travel far....without a little Big Star...

Ron and Fez 11 to 3

by YvonLabresMoustache on May 14, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

to be fair we went on a bit of a win streak, something like the best in franchise history, in the games immediately after he was converted to center. Then he faded and made me not want him back.

"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"

by MikeyGreen on May 14, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec for truthiness

#NeedsMoreBradley

by Addison H. on May 14, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s only the coaches fault if he fades because he’s is tired. I think it is at least as likely that Flash fades because he doesn’t play with enough balls to produce when things ramp up down the stretch and in the playoffs.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I anxiously await F&B’s opinion today….

Cue F&B in 5,4,3,2…..

by Link_Gaetz on May 14, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Way too early. I’d expect him around 2 pm.

by DrinkingPartner on May 14, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah 11:14 AM? Not until Bar prep starts. For the next week I won’t get out of bed before 1.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted 6. I expected him to put up 20+ goals this season, but not 50 points in 69 games. I was more thinking along the lines of 20 goals, 25 assists. And yeah, he disappeared in the playoffs, but then again, so did a lot of other Caps.

What should the caps be willing to commit to him in dollars and years? No dollars, no years. He’s probably our most valuable trade asset at this point, and it’s hard to see what need he fills now or going forward. He doesn’t fit into a bottom-six energy/checking role. Trying him at center wasn’t a great option for us. We have too much depth on the top-two lines on the left side, and a number of utility players who can line up on either wing. And there are a handful of teams out there who could really use a player like Fleischmann on the left side on their second line.

Let’s put it this way: looking forward to 2011, we have two choices about who to put at the left wing on the second line. One possibility is Brooks Laich. The other is Tomas Fleischmann. Who would you rather have under contract?

"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"

"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."

by Wheeler on May 14, 2010 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Brooks Laich. Over and over and over again.

Wait, what were we talking about?

#NeedsMoreBradley

by Addison H. on May 14, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

amen

"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"

by MikeyGreen on May 14, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

voted 6. I expected him to put up 20+ goals this season, but not 50 points in 69 games. I was more thinking along the lines of 20 goals, 25 assists. And yeah, he disappeared in the playoffs, but then again, so did a lot of other Caps.

Two questions (and any over the folks who gave Flash a vote of over 5 can respond):

If Flash has been talked up for a couple years now, wouldn’t his offensive improvement be meeting expectations? He did score 19 last year after all.

If his job is to produce, and he doesn’t produce when it counts, shouldn’t that impact his grade?

I’m just trying to understand the other side of the debate on him.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not to speak for someone else or anything, but I think Wheeler did a great job of addressing your first point in the text you quoted.

wouldn’t his offensive improvement be meeting expectations?

and wheeler specifically stated

I expected him to put up 20+ goals this season, but not 50 points in 69 games

As for the 2nd point…well, I voted a 5 and feel dirty for it. But I couldn’t justify going lower because his late season/playoff fade was, sadly, exactly what I expected. So while he underproduced for my hopes, he did not underproduce for my expectations.

by GusDaMan on May 14, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gave a 5, because I expected ~20-30-50, and not much else. I wanted more, but didn’t really get it, nor did I expect it.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that voting on the aggregate numbers (and I know a lot of people are doing it, not just you) misses a huge chunk of what’s wrong with Flash, and that is the second-half drop-off. It’s similar to Semin in that there’s real value in consistency and dependability and Flash brings neither.

Would I have been happy with a ~20-30-50 season out of him this year? Perhaps, if that was one goal every four games; defintiely not, if that was 15 in the first half and 5 in the second.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I more wanted to try and answer BP’s question than justify my five(Which I did below), and while I understand your aversion to aggregates in this case, I’m voting on what I expected over the entire season from the start of the ear. I’m not missing his drop off, it’s just I didn’t raise my expectations because he came out of the gate hot. There’s a ton wrong with Flash, but even if we don’t want to vote on aggregates, I’d average out my votes – for the first half, I would vote ~7, 8. For the second, maybe ~2, 3. It’s still a 5 on the entire year.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fehr enough. Like I said, I was speaking more generally.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I can see your point entirely. I think it’s just the nature of the poll’s description, more than anything. It might be more beneficial (and also get us to July 1st faster) to have another set of polls after this one, voting 1-10 on how we think they value to the team. It’s a lot of work, though, so I wouldn’t expect it, and it might be more of a fanpost/shot project for some commentors (I’ll take a few if need be).

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Allow me to rephrase – by “more beneficial”, I mean it might be supplementary type beneficial.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

But did you really expect Flash to pour it on all season long? I surely didn’t. I think his total production was a bit more than I expected, and I pretty much expected him not to be consistent/not to be counted on during the playoffs. So, hard not to give him a 5 despite the fact that I think his value to the team is about a 3.

by Reckless on May 14, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

In retrospect, I think the second-half drop off was more than likely, given that he didn’t get to do a whole lot of conditioning or training in the off-season. And he’s tended to score goals in bunches.

"Ovechkin, what is good in life?"

"To crush your enemies. To see them driven before you. And to hear the lamentations of their captain."

by Wheeler on May 14, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

… and it’s happened before. In the two seasons prior to this, for example, he totalled one goal and no assists in 24 March games. That’s pretty staggering.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

n retrospect, I think the second-half drop off was more than likely, given that he didn’t get to do a whole lot of conditioning or training in the off-season.

I can think of a guy that hasn’t had a single healthy NHL off-season and yet has found ways to improve his game every season. Maybe not earth-shattering advances, but something small and identifiable every season. He’s just a little bit better, a little more well-rounded as a player. Yes, I am sympathetic to off-season rehab, but Flash’s a) wasn’t that bad and b) didn’t fully preclude him from working out. I see no excuse for him to bring the exact same game he brought last year. Don’t just focus on the numbers (which are pretty similar anyway), but what part of Flash’s game improved from 08-09 to 09-10?

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can think of a guy that hasn’t had a single healthy NHL off-season and yet has found ways to improve his game every season.

I assume you’re talking about Fehr, yes?

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Indubitably.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

shooting percentage? and i hold that against him as being somewhat lucky, showing that his game didn’t really improve.

by six hole on May 14, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it’s difficult to judge based on consistency of results; effort, sure — and there definitely have been times for both those players where you can tell that the work just wasn’t being put in.

In this specific case I think you need to give a little credit to him being jerked between positions during the second half, though.

-d

by meep_42 on May 14, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

3. Since he’s never going to play defense, I’d have given him a 5 if his playoffs weren’t so friggin’ abyssmal.

As to the larger discussion, if he’s reupped, it shouldn’t be for more than $1.25m per, and to get a 10, not being in the bottom 3 forwards of the 5v5 GAON/60 (while maintaining his offensive production) would be nice.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Putting a max of 1.25m on a 50 pt scorer in less than a full season would be a bit asinine. People will take a chance on him for way more than that.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

As the team has first refusal rights, I look forward to a decent draft pick for the overpayment.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

Frak, yes. Flash for a 2? sign me up.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 14, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let ’em.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I agree. I was just pointing out that 1.25 would be unprecedented for a 50pt guy who would’ve had 60+ if he skated a full season, or 70 if he had normal PP time.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

What’s the point in paying anything over $1.25 when you’ve got first refusal and:

a) He hasn’t played D in more than 250 pro games (and almost 300 under this coach)?

b) If he’s charged to produce as you say, why he had 2 more shots than PIMS in a 7 game series?

c) He turns 26 in 2 days and (historically) there’s not a helluva much more developing you can do as a forward?

Why overpay on what he can do when you can pay on what he’s already done?

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, so you qualify him with 1.25 offer or whatever, he gets on offer sheet and we let him walk. I’m not saying I would give him a lot more, in my post I said I would consider keeping him around for 1.5 but it still doesn’t mean he’d fit any better, so I’d still just let him walk anyway. All I’m saying is that his market value is far above 1.25. I’m not really disagreeing with you.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Extending him and doubling his salary in the process when you don’t have to? Not going to happen (or more exactly: better not happen ahead of the other team needs).

That said, if they can extend him for 2-3 years, then his trade value just got a lot better.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here’s a question: how much do you think he would get signed for if he was a UFA next year? What’s his market value? I think we are in different ball parks.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is that relevant? He’s not a UFA, he’s an RFA.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

His UFA value is irrelevant to this: If I’m a team looking for help in my forward corps, Flash re-upped for 2 years at $1.5 per becomes a lot more desirable asset than renting him for $1.25 and having him go out on the market.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Five

Who expected anything different? I was tempted to take off an extra point for the playoff no-show and truly brutal defensive stats, but his first flash of offense (pun intended, of course) was impressive. Too bad he’s not a complete player, but I don’t think he’s getting much better.

I doubt (wishful thinking?) we’ll see him next year: either he signs an offer sheet and we get some much-needed draft picks, or he’s part of a sign and trade (2C, anyone?). I hear the Penguins need wingers… In either scenario, I bet he gets more than 2 million per—which is more than he’s worth.

by RPI93 on May 14, 2010 11:34 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Who expected anything different?

He is who we thought he is!

/Dennis Green’d

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly. He neither exceeded nor failed to meet my expectations, so I couldn’t give him below a 6. We know what we’re getting with Flash.

I also didn’t believe that the “strength” he lost due to pneumonia last year contributed to his weak playoffs then; he’s just not a playoff player. We saw that this year sans pneumonia excuse.

DC Landing Strip - Waxed and Ready to Go

by Alex Reed on May 14, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is exactly why I am surprised at such low numbers here for Flash. He scored a ton. He is Flash. No matter what you think of him, looking at his overall production he was not a disaster. He was a plus player with a ton of points.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

And a Mike Green pant-sized tendency to not play defense.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, I totally concede any critiques of his nonexistent defensive play. But you can’t ignore some of the offensive rates that I pointed out in my post.

1.12 goals/60min, 34th in the league. Teams need goal scoring. GMs and coaches will convince themselves they can reign in his defense play. He plays a run and gun style here. He has a real upside to them, even if we know better.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

See above. He’s 26, provided no goals when it came to crunch time and if he goes elsewhere, he’s going to have to get broken hard to come close to playing D, thus dropping his production.

If another team wants to give him $2m per for that, I’d help him pack.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

1.12 goals/60min, 34th in the league.

But over 100000000000 games I bet that would drop. Especially if those games were all in the spring.

Plus, the Caps would have been the top scorer in the league without him.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sure. My underlying point in almost every post has basically been: Flash is an offensive asset. Teams need offense, and are willing to pay for it and takes risks to get it. I don’t want him on our team, I think he doesn’t fit and gets exposed too often in our style of play, but other teams will value what he brings to the table.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know. But I’m going to bust balls until I see that FanPost.

And yeah, Flash has offense and all that, but I honestly don’t see how every GM in the league doesn’t see what Caps fans see. Maybe someone gets desperate for him but I honestly think he is less attractive than his stat line and GMs know it.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

And yeah, Flash has offense and all that for the first few months of the season

FTFY

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade deadline bait.

by EmilyB on May 14, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know. But I’m going to bust balls until I see that FanPost.

Hahaha. Can’t blame ya…

Maybe someone gets desperate for him but I honestly think he is less attractive than his stat line and GMs know it.

Sure, but even if you undervalue his statline, there is still some meat left. Just look at what Toronto gave up for 30 goals a year. I’m not saying Flash is anywhere near Kessel, but what GMs will do for goal scoring can be scary.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess we’ll see. You keep wanting to compare his stat line and ignore all the other stuff. Kessel, while I think he mostly blows, does have undeniable game-breaking ability. Flash doesn’t. Kessel hit 30 goals much younger. Flash hasn’t come that close. Finally, Flash was surrounded by the best offensive team in the league and force fed PP time and played with great players all year. Fuck. Him.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree. Even though I think he’s one dimensional, Kessel has it. But Flash has a touch that a team could really be hurting for, and they could convince themselves that they could limit his lapses in his own zone in a different system. Who knows, if we know anything it’s that a lot of GMs are just bad.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re very General/Battalion-centered today, my friend.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s Dick-Joke Friday.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

He used to have them. Now he has it

I thought this was about Kessel not Sami Salo?

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Patrick Thoresen?

by Love and Osechkin on May 14, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

4

Good top-line stats would get the Meat Man a 6, but they’re largely from a high shooting percentage and power play production to go with defensive indifference. So I have a 5 that loses another point on intangibles, incuding playoff suck-itude (no I didn’t have that much of it in my expectations). His next bodycheck will be his first.

He’s decent insurance on Semin, but I wouldn’t want to pay more than $1.5M for that this year. I’m not convinced Flach can produce without high quality linemates around him. Bottom line I think we trade him to whichever GM needs a scorer and wants to overvalue his top line stats. But I don’t know if we can get more than a 2nd for him, which could just mean letting him walk on any offer sheet above $1.3M.

by six hole on May 14, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

This is roughly where I am as well. I had slightly higher hopes for him on the season given his offensive growth the last few years, and he came off to a great start. However, his defensive breakdowns and stagnation in the latter half of the season were a big disappointment, I found.

"In the depths of winter, I learned there was in me an invincible summer" ~Albert Camus

by Madelle on May 14, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

1 is the loneliest number

I succumbed to the temptation to display my general disgust with Flash. He’s a one-trick pony that only performs that trick when the stakes are lowest. He makes Wellwood look like a bastion of manly fortitude.

His entire performance was so predictable that I ought to have given him a 4, docking him a point for not even scoring in the playoffs, but I dislike him so strongly that I can’t bring myself to do it.

He sucks.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 14, 2010 11:41 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Fleischmann’s problem is summed up perfectly here:

[Fleischmann] had the worst 5-on-5 Corsi rating and goals-against-on-ice-per-sixty (GAON/60) of any forward that spent the entire season on the team and the worst 5-on-5 penalty plus-minus (penalties drawn minus penalties taken) of any skater who played at least half of the team’s games other than John Erskine. Fleischmann was also arguably the team’s worst penalty-killing forward, considering his GAON/60 at 4-on-5 and the quality of competition and teammates contributing to that number. Lastly, Flash only won 43.1% of his face-offs, rendering him largely unplayable at center.

Basically, he’s a wing who stinks at everything other than scoring. Not even mediocre, downright bad on defense, in penalty differential, in physical play, etc. To compensate for that you need to bring it with your offense. And Fleischmann doesn’t bring enough offense to make up for his failings in other areas.

As a restricted free agent, how much (in dollars and years) should the Caps be willing to commit to Fleischmann this summer? Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps?

If I’m the Caps I at least tender him for a year, rather than lose the asset outright, but I’d really like to see them move him in the offseason. If he can be part of package that addresses one of the team’s needs, great. If not, deal him for a pick (or picks) and recoup some of the drafting depth they lost at the trade deadline. But the guy, in my mind, doesn’t have a place with this team right now, and the need to move him is greater because of Boudreau’s infatuation with him.

by David Getz on May 14, 2010 11:42 AM EDT reply actions   4 recs

[Fleischmann] had the worst 5-on-5 Corsi rating and goals-against-on-ice-per-sixty (GAON/60) of any forward that spent the entire season on the team and the worst 5-on-5 penalty plus-minus (penalties drawn minus penalties taken) of any skater who played at least half of the team’s games other than John Erskine.

An argument for Lumberjack’s contract.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not a good one. I wouldn’t boast about being better than Flash in a non-scoring stat. Particularly when Flash is the only guy you are better than.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Shhhhhhh. Lumberjack owns.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shhhhhhh. Lumberjack owns the worst contract on the D corps.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great point, hopefully GMGM and BB see it this way too

If I’m the Caps I at least tender him for a year, rather than lose the asset outright, but I’d really like to see them move him in the offseason. If he can be part of package that addresses one of the team’s needs, great. If not, deal him for a pick (or picks) and recoup some of the drafting depth they lost at the trade deadline. But the guy, in my mind, doesn’t have a place with this team right now, and the need to move him is greater because of Boudreau’s infatuation with him.

LET'S GO CAPS!!!

by Elliotte on May 14, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

He exceeded my meager expectations, but sometimes it’s now where you finished as much as it is how you got there. Fast start, dud of a finish. At this point, I think there is a pretty clear picture that he is what he is… sort of an Ales Hemsky-lite (a reasonably gifted offensive performer who isn’t sturdy enough at many of the other aspects of the game). Very lite.

He is on a very cap-friendly contract ($725K), and he could end up being back next year if he gets a similarly cap-friendly contract (he is an arbitration-eligible RFA). The Caps have an adequate supply of skill among their forwards. Fleischmann is not a top-six forward on this team unless he plays center, and it is not a position to which he seems suited at this level of play (right now, Mathieu Perreault is a better center, but then again in fairness to Flesichmann, he’s actually played the position regularly in recent years). He is not a third-liner sort unless you’re trying to build three scoring lines.

I’m scratching my head at just what sort of role he has with this team next year.

If you've read this far...seek help.

by ThePeerless on May 14, 2010 11:52 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m scratching my head at just what sort of role he has with this team next year.

Trade bait right in the middle of his early-mid season hot streak.

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gave him a 3. I expected a breakout year with strong defensive improvement and a potentially lethal PP2 unit with him. I was in the flash lobby until this year and after defending him for the first half of the year I have flopped to the anti-flash lobby and don’t want him back. His stats will get him way too large of a raise than he is worth in a cap constrained environment. I hope we can sucker some team into a trade for his RFA rights.

"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"

by MikeyGreen on May 14, 2010 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I voted 5

He pretty much did exactly what I expected: over 20 goals, nice regular season that tailed off as the season went on, disappeared for long stretches, was a defensive liability, received more ice time than he deserved (though the PP numbers noted above were a surprise to me), and was nowhere to be seen in the playoffs. Nothing that he did really surprised me in a good or bad direction.

The Discussion: As a restricted free agent, how much (in dollars and years) should the Caps be willing to commit to Fleischmann this summer? Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?

Flash needs to be traded to clear up roster/salary space, plain and simple. He was a bargain at 750k even though he is useless in the post-season/when he’s not scoring, but at his new rate of pay (likely approaching $2M) he’s a luxury the caps should neither need nor want (regular season solid depth scorer, not much else added). A team that needs more goal production could certainly use him and be quite happy with him at that rate, but not the caps. Flash, begone!

Oh, to get a 10 next year he’d need to put up similar offensive numbers, but show the ability to play a more physical game and be a consistent performer throughout the regular season and playoffs. And by more physical, I don’t mean hitting people; I mean successfully going to the high traffic areas for the “ugly” goals, doing a better job of posessing the puck and working with it below the goal-line (rather than just floating on the perimeter), don’t be knocked off the puck / out of the play as easily, things like that. Also, become a reliable and solid PK’er.

by GusDaMan on May 14, 2010 11:59 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

And by more physical, I don’t mean hitting people; I mean successfully going to the high traffic areas for the "ugly" goals, doing a better job of posessing the puck and working with it below the goal-line (rather than just floating on the perimeter), don’t be knocked off the puck / out of the play as easily, things like that.

Rec’d for this. Hitting <> Physical play.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

A Tale of Three seasons

8 for the first half of the season, particularly after missing training camp and the first 11 games of the season.
4 for the second half of the season. not a 2 because he did step up when ov was out and did play out of position for some of those games.
1 for the playoffs. ’nuff said.

overall a 3.

i’m sure there’s a price at which it makes sense to retain him. i’m thinking its got to be at or below the $1.1 that stecks is getting. i would not mind seeing him moved, particularly in december when his trade value may be at it highest. he’s a 26 year old 30 goal scorer who will probably have a nice easy cap number. who wouldnt want that? well, the caps i hope. this team has enough firepower that losing flash’s offensive upside wont kill them. we just cant have a playoff ghost on this roster this time next year.

to get a 10 next year, he’d need to put up similar numbers but more consistently and in the playoffs. if he were to score a 10 next year, he’s be the most unlikely guy to score a 10 since seal.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

30 goal scorer?

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

His gpg this year = 30 if he played all 82.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 6:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

A lot of us are on board with moving Flash this offseason. What are the realistic odds that it happens? My concern is that McPhee and Boudreau will preach "patience with the 25-year old and claim that he can still develop. The problem, obviously, is that if he’s on the roster next year he’ll probably play every single night.

Also, if they bring back Flash, it restricts what the team can do in the offseason since there aren’t a lot of openings in the lineup that the team can make changes with.

by Kolzilla on May 14, 2010 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think the odds heavily favoring keeping him or bringing him back. My guess is McPhee knows there are changes that need to be made, knows Fleischmann could be an attractive commodity, and will bring him up in discussion, but won’t move him unless he has what he feels like is a good offer. In other words, I doubt he has the “get Fleischmann out of here because Boudreau’s infatuation with him is hurting the team” outlook some of us do.

by David Getz on May 14, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope that when McPhee sits down with Boudreau this offseason, Flash comes up. McPhee and the brass surely are aware of Flash’s defensive deficiencies and his shortcomings elsewhere. They are obviously aware of the disparity in ice time between Flash and Fehr. Maybe they can politely suggest to Bruce that he re-evaluate his outlook on the situation.

by Kolzilla on May 14, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the odds heavily favor him returning. To begin with, his value is low at the moment, for reasons outlined in the post and elsewhere, and GMGM isn’t a “trade low” guy. But he’s 25 (26 on Sunday), and has bumped his goal and point totals up in each of the past few years. He also proved himself as a playoff performer in the AHL (53 points in 39 games) and was a European drafted by the Red Wings (and they don’t miss on those, right?).

Most importantly, though, he’s cheap and productive enough during the regular season right now to warrant another look given the uncertainty surrounding Semin’s future past next year. I think that if a move on Flash is to be made, it’ll be made when there’s more clarity involving Semin.

I’m not saying I buy the rationale above, but it’s there and it doesn’t even touch on the Boudreau-Fleischmann relationship or GMGM’s history of not trading assets. I’m betting he’s back and the best we can hope for is a good contract and a mid-season trade.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree. GMGM doesn’t like to let assets just walk, e.g. keeping Eminger even though it was clear they didn’t want him. Flash will be back and we just have to hope that someone offers GMGM a deal he can’t refuse.

"Yes, but Rimmer Directive 271 states just as clearly, 'No chance you metal ba****d.'"

by apk3000 on May 14, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about the scenario where we offer him what he’s worth, but he decides he can get more on the open market and walks?

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t do it, assuming the Caps tender him (which they will).

by David Getz on May 14, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

So you low ball him and take an offer sheet. That sounds like by far the best situation.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. Sign him to the lowest QO you can and then see if anyone wants him more.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

This has to be the best plan. Squeeze a 2nd out of him and run like the wind.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eric Fehr and Tomas Fleischmann seem, in an odd way, to be joined at the hip. They have been fighting for the same job, more or less — scoring winger not named “Alex” — since they joined the organization. Fehr is among the most efficient goal scorers in the league this past season. He has other facets of his game upon which he can rely if he isn’t scoring goals. Flesichmann is a better puck handler and passer, but the Caps already have a player like that — his name is Alexander Semin (Of course, then the problem becomes one of Semin’s expiring contract next year). But if Fleischmann isn’t puck handling or passing (or, as it turns out, goal-scoring, which he did well overall), there is almost nothing else to his game. In fact, he can be a liability.

I agree with DMG here in this respect — Fleischmann won’t be hustled out of town just for the sake of opening a roster spot; the Caps will (and should) seek value in return. But in the rankings of “irreplaceable” players, he’s about 18th on the list.

If you've read this far...seek help.

by ThePeerless on May 14, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question for a bunch of people – if Semin isn’t on the squad in two years, do you want Flash?

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

No.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

At $1.5M or under, probably. I can’t see how else we’ll be replacing Semin.

by six hole on May 14, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

(Of course, then the problem becomes one of Semin’s expiring contract next year).

To me, therein lies the biggest rub in the whole Flash discussion. I think he’s really cheap Semin insurance (obviously with much lesser production). Sure, you could use that Semin money to replace the Semin production, but by that time you probably are going to have to reinvest that money within the organization anyway.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s the problem… looking out three years, if things go badly roster-wise, you have a top-six of Ovechkin-Backstrom-Fehr, Laich and a couple of guys who aren’t on the roster. Better hope one or more of Johnasson, Eakin, Gustafsson, and Kugryshev progress nicely.

If you've read this far...seek help.

by ThePeerless on May 14, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which is why I think they hold Flash and hope, given his price point.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t forget Perrault. I think it’s possible at least.

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see why you’d think all of those guys would bust. Mackan and Eakin already look like great picks, plus there are some other guys in that group that could help out that you didn’t mention and we are still going to be drafting players that might pan out.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

“look like” … “could” … “might”

Flash looked pretty good before getting to the NHL too.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn’t following prospects, and certainly not Wings prospects, back in 03, but I don’t remember ever hearing any hype about Flash being a guy that either fell farther than he should have, or him putting up solid numbers in an adult league.

Your point is well-taken, but I don’t think it’s apples to apples. The guy we have that I’m afraid is Flash 2.0 is Bouchard. Maybe I’m overly optimistic about Eakin and Mackan (especially Mackan) but knowing what I know now I’d trade away Flash for either Eakin or Mackan straight up.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. I just think it’s safer to plan around guys like that not making it than to assume they will.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the numbers back you up on this one – studs from the A, and for sure from major-junior, more likely fail to turn into an NHL regular.

I’m not sure what a safe assumption regarding rate is, though. 25%? In other words, if you have 4 guys that are studs in the A, figure 1 of them turns into a regular NHL contributor? Lower? My gut tells me surely it’s no higher.

"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP

by fat_daddyo on May 14, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. I’m pretty sure I’ve said it before, our strength is in our depth. If all we had was Mackan it would be a problem. But we have Mackan, and Eakin, MP, Bouchard, Gordon, Kuger and then some even lower guys. Odds are that they all won’t pan out, but the odds are also that they won’t all bust. Add whatever forwards we draft in the next few years and that group should be somewhat sustainable.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wouldn’t mind still having Osala in that stable…

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess. He was part of that depth so he adds to the odds, but of all the guys he’s probably the easiest to part with. At least Bouchard seemed to take a step forward this year (i.e. wasn’t stuck on the fourth line). At the beginning of the year I would have kept OO over Bouchard, and I’m still not high on Bouchard, but OO has lost the luster.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Osala, 2nd <→ Flash!

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d settle for just the 2nd. If CAR wants to return OO, then why not?

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ah, yes… Flash would balance out the other Canes, who tend to flake out in the beginning of the season and get better towards the end.

Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.

by alex_k on May 14, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Ha. Perfect.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

So a Semin by committee, with promoted Bears and a FA around $3m per?

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Something like that. I’d rather just call it “building a well-rounded team” but we can also look at it in terms of replacing Semin’s specific contributions.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. Related, the UFA F list in 2011.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we’ll be worried about keeping our own by that point. Alzner and Carlson are not going to be cheap to keep around.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

2

And only because of his decent regular season (first half), otherwise he would have gotten a 1. If there was a 0, I would have considered it.

He is a travesty of a hockey player, an absolutely gutless waste of space. He should be ashamed of himself. I honestly expected at least tolerable mediocrity; Flash’s playoff performance was so far below it that it practically eviscerates whatever he did in the regular season for me. He was an ECHL player out there, with the heart of a little girl Squirt B player.

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 12:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey, that’s insulting to little girls!

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahahaha. Hmmm I wonder what you’d have voted if he didn’t score at the 34th best pace in the league, shooting 19%!

negative 50? Really, people are probably voting too low here… he produced goals, which on our team is easy to undervalue… but when you look around the league, people are killing for that kind of production.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was scoring goals when it mattered the least. When it mattered the most, the meager value he had became 0 at best, or in fact negative. That’s two years in a row that’s happened. (Yes, he scored a few goals in last year’s playoffs. But he was also the weak-willed pansy he was this year – that seems to be his default playoff mode.)

When a player like Flash bonks in the late season and playoffs consistently, I’m putting blinders on assessing the earlier season contributions. Don’t mean jack.

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

The discussion of regular season vs. playoff production is a good one. How they are related (or more interestingly how they differ), how much value should be placed on each— these are great questions. But they aren’t the ones you’re asking. He has shown to be a pretty below average NHL playoff producer (in a smallish sample size), but a monster in the AHL and far above average offensively during the regular season. It’s just not as easy as saying “He sucks in the postseason, so he sucks.” You can say that, but it would be pretty meaningless.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

It would be if it weren’t a trend. If he consistently proves to suck in the late season and playoffs, that is part of the player that he is. If that is the player he is, then he sucks. Since he’s done it twice in a row now, it’s not a stretch to conclude that he’s peaked. As a sucky suckbat.

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahahahah. So you know I don’t disagree with you that, in general, he sucked. However, despite how badly he sucked in many situations, he managed to put together a far above average offensive regular season. It’s just really hard to argue that successfully.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course. So let’s make a rudimentary equation of the value of a player that balances regular season and playoffs, weighted heavily for playoff contribution.

Player Value = .90*(playoff production) + .10*(regular season production)

Flash Value = .90*(negative five billion) + .10*(51 points).

Flash Value = Negative 4.9 billion

The keyboard is mightier.

by breed16 on May 14, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that math is indisputable.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually that math is very disputable.
Flash Value = Negative 4.5 billion.
You’re welcome.

by benjik on May 14, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not disagreeing with most of this, but I think the scoring goals when it mattered least point is a little harsh. Granted, he didn’t score when they needed him to the most (aka the playoffs) but I seem to recall him putting up some ridiculous goal totals when our biggest source of goal-scoring – Ovechkin – was on the sidelines.

…just one little pro-Flash note in a world of anti-Flash sentiment. I want him gone, too.

by Becca H on May 14, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t particularly care about his value to other teams (aside from in the context of trading). I care about the value he added/adds to the Caps, and it was almost none. Regular season goals mean dick for the Caps, they get enough of those. If the Caps can’t count on him to produce in the playoffs, what good is he?

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

5

My vote is an average of the first half (8) and the second half (2). If there was a vote for only the post season, he would get a 1 or less.

If the first half is any indication, the guy can play, but the second half showed he needs to work on conditioning, and work on consistency. If he were half as good in the last 30 games and playoffs as he was to start the season, his play might have been enough to beat the Habs (remember, three of the Caps 4 losses in the series were by a goal.)

What does he have to do to get 10 next year? 30 goals. He has shown the potential for it… now he has to do it.

I seem entering camp hoping to win a job as a top 6 guy,but I don’t think he is going to do it.

As for salary… when the Caps make his QO, he better sign it, or they’ll pull it off the table and offer him less.

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy

by MikeL-Pivonka on May 14, 2010 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

5

Look, most of you don’t like him, but he’s a decent NHLer who can put a few pucks in and generate some offense, and that’s it. Guys like this have existed, believe it or not. The only problem is, now the talent level is so thick that guys like this don’t amaze us with their offense to the point of we need to ignore their defense.

The guy, at this point, is a poor man’s Jaromir Jagr or Marian Gaborik, and I mean like Birmingham, Alabama poor. He’s a good offensive player (20 goal scorers don’t fall off trees yet, though). With top minutes, he could put up the numbers those guys do. The problem is, on the Capitals, we have too many better players to put into situations.

I’m a Flash fan, and I’ll probably want him to do well wherever he goes, but his place on this team is gone unless he starts doing the little things in the corners, winning faceoffs, doing something in the defensive zone, etc., and I don’t see him doing it next year, or any year until he gets a coach who pounds those values into players heads instead of just “Hey, score more goals than the other team. Defense? uh…shit, Bob, can you handle this one?” And yeah, Flash’s issues are mostly coaching based. His minutes compared to other players (I’m not just going to say Fehr, because there’s other guys on the team he leeched minutes from, and maybe there’s a story behind Fehr that he can’t play but so many minutes per game because of an injury instead of just “he’s in the fucking dog house”) are far too high, and he needs either a new coach or a change of scenery.

He’ll be a cheap signing, and if he gets more than 1.1 million and more than two years, even as a fan of his I’ll be upset, but I wouldn’t cry if someone gave him a contract offer for ~2 million with his skillset, and I wouldn’t cry if we let him go. I don’t see what he brings outside of scoring that Francois Bouchard, Chris Bourque, or Matthieu Perreault can’t bring more of in a year or two, and the scoring isn’t what’s hurting our team.

To get a 10 next year, he’d have to play ~75 games, gain 15 pounds of muscle, start winning corner battles, score ~25 goals, ~35 assists, ~60 points, get ~20-30 PIMs, and win ~50% of his draws.

To get a 5, he’d have to stay the course. I don’t expect shit else from him.

To get a 1, he’d have to stop scoring.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 12:42 PM EDT reply actions  

20 goal scorers do not fall from trees, correct. But he got 20 playing on an offensive juggernaut. put him in Edmonton, or Florida, and lets see what he can do.

by The Jade Donkey on May 14, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

With the minutes he’d get there, I could see him scoring 20 just fine.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely disagree that Flash could put up Jagr or even Gaborik numbers with top line minutes.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could doesn’t mean would. I’m saying if his offensive acumen develops and he was given the chance, I wouldn’t be surprised.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would be stunned. He has neither the game breaking speed nor the world class shot of Gaborik, and he doesn’t have anything close to the size and overall talent of Jagr. For as much shit as Jagr took for being soft and lazy, when he was on he used his size incredibly well and it was extremely difficult to knock him off the puck.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is just… wrong.

In his 21-25-year-old seasons, Flash has amassed 56 goals and 128 points in 260 games.

In his 21-25-year-old seasons, Jagr amassed 208 goals and 515 points in 350 games.

In his 21-25-year-old seasons, Gaborik amassed 128 goals and 246 points in 255 games.

In his 26-year-old season, Jagr scored 44 goals and had 127 points in 81 games and won the Ross, Hart and Pearson trophies.

In his 26-year-old season, Jagr scored 44 goals and had 127 points in 81 games and won the Ross, Hart and Pearson trophies.

Gaborik’s 26-year-old season was derailed by injuries, but he had 13 goals and 23 points in 17 games.

On what planet – with what linemates and ice time – could Tomas Fleischmann approach those numbers?

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Planet USA All Star Team!

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

And not even that, beginning next years, when the AHL reverts to a East/West format.

by EmilyB on May 14, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

(Jagr’s 26-year-old season stats repeated… um… for emphasis)

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, it WAS a really good year.

If you've read this far...seek help.

by ThePeerless on May 14, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was a good year when I was 17.

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was a very good year.

by EmilyB on May 14, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

With top minutes, he could put up the numbers those guys do.

WM, I like you and you’re an important part of the Rink community, but this is fucking asinine. There isn’t a single scenario in the world that makes Flash an equivalent scorer to Gaborik or Jagr. At least, not if you are comparing Flash to healthy Gaborik. Sure, if you popped Gaborik’s groin for about 4 months out of the season Flash could probably match him.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

wow. You guys had at it. I chose to just leave it alone for a while and get back to work.
my contention, absurdity aside, is that Flash could get 20+ goals just based on TOI. The kid plays on the 2nd line. Its not going to get any better than that. He’s not good enough to play on the 1st line, and if he did play on the first line, he wouldn’t be anywhere near as good as Jagr or Gaborik. He scored a lot on a team that picked up the slack for him. Stick him on the 2nd line on a crap team and he’s not going to do anything like what he’s done on the Caps. For fucks sake, if he had to play a system that wasn’t go, gadget, go, he’d have been scratched most of the season; he doesn’t play any defense. He’s invisible here, he would practically cease to exist anywhere else.

by The Jade Donkey on May 14, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looking back at this now, I feel dumb.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 17, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

7

Well, I thought the spread would be bigger here, but it looks like on the whole people were disappointed with Flash. He was 86th in the league in points per game, which may not necessarily sound impressive, but consider his medium-smallish amount of PP time and look at it another way: he was 57th in the league among all skaters in points/60minutes (minimum 40 games), and at 1.12 he was 34th… yes 34th in goals/60 minutes (Ovie was 1st, Sasha 2nd, Fehr 5th. Yea, the Caps are good.) In terms of putting the puck into the net, that efficiency is hard to overlook. Howevvvveeerrrrrr, yes, to put it nicely…he was a liability on defense. Horrible, awful, craptastic, are words that might better describe it. At 2.92 He was 319th among forwards in Goals against/60, and to give some perspective, that is out of 385 players.

In the end, no matter how much you hate his foppish, floaty, don’t-want-to-get-my-jersey-dirty style… he put the puck in the net, a lot. Way more than I expected, and more than the other team put the puck into the net against him. Which, ultimately, is all that matters. And when you consider how bad he was on the otherside of the puck, this is pretty impressive.

But moving onto JPs discussion point: What do you pay him (if anything)?

Considering his ridiculously unsustainable 19.0 SH%, it’s hard to expect he’s going to be a plus player next year, unless he drastically changes his game, or is carried by his line (again.) I let him walk everytime, considering our logjam on the wing and his inability to win draws. I think his actual value is around ~1.5-2mil and would entertain signing him at that to play on the third line, but that just doesn’t make an ounce of sense considering who he’d be playing with and the role that we and most teams expect out of our thrid line. He was a weak 2nd liner for us, and that’s exactly what he’s going to be wherever he ends up.

I think any team in the league that pays him more than 2.5 is making a mistake, but since he had raw numbers this year he will probably get ~3mil@3-4y on the open market.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 12:43 PM EDT reply actions  

i think the dissapointment stems from the drop off in production, particularly in the playoffs, again. clearly as caps fans, we know full well that production in oct-jan is nice, but may-june is more important. so while he put up some good average numbers, they were heavily weighted towards the front side of the season. if he put up the same numbers, but did so consistently and chipped in even a bit during the post season, his ratings would be siginificantly higher. i know mine would.

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

4

The aggregate numbers are fine, but the drop-off troubling. Right around expectations entering the year (but way below the expectations he re-calibrated by the midpoint), and quite a bit below expectations for the playoffs.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

When you say the aggregate numbers are fine, I assume you’re only talking about his raw scoring totals. The rest of those aggregate numbers that involve GA are not even remotely fine. They’re awful. Of those forwards that played 20 games, Flash had a better 5v5 RATING than only Brads and Steckel.

In my opinion, the drop-off during the year is less troubling than the fact that we aren’t seeing any improvement in the other parts of his game, at all. I can handle extended scoring streaks and slumps if the aggregate numbers add up, but what I can’t handle is ignoring defensive responsibilities and an unwillingness to dig in the corners or hustle on the forecheck. If I even got the hint that Flash was trying to work harder at doing these things better, I’d be a lot more lenient with him.

It’s sort of opposite of the reason why I wasn’t getting as upset with Semin during the playoffs as others were. Even though he wasn’t scoring, he was doing a lot of the little things right. He was controlling the puck, backchecking, staying out of the box, and not making bonehead mistakes. Even when not scoring, Semin is able to still be a net positive. Flash showed pretty consistently this year that he is not.

by psuscott1 on May 14, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you say the aggregate numbers are fine, I assume you’re only talking about his raw scoring totals.

Yes, totally. Should’ve been more clear on that.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he the perfect KHL player?

by RCheli on May 14, 2010 12:58 PM EDT reply actions  

No. We don’t get shit if he goes to the KHL

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Considering he had zero off-season conditioning due to his DVT, the fact that he kept pace with his previous year’s totals impressed me. But his horrendous PK play and drop off over the season kept my vote at 5.
If they can keep him below $1M (and he gets some good endurance training over the summer) I wouldn’t object to him staying on. But considering he’s eligible for arbitration, I wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes a bigger contract number. Another 20 goal scorer may be something the Caps may not need, but it’s still a plateau that the NHL sees as an accomplishment worthy of a pay raise.

"It hit me on the pants. I had protection. It felt good. Why? I wanted to win."

by bagace on May 14, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

4

Flash did exactly what I thought he’d do: disappoint.
I thought I was going to have to eat crow at the halfway point. I thought that maybe I was wrong about the guy, and that Bruce’s crush on him was warranted; perhaps he had some diamond in the rough upside that would negate his deficiencies.
Nope.
I wanted him gone at the deadline, or before, for one specific reason, and its the reason we are now confronted with: If the Caps flame out, or their post season goes awry, and Flash doesn’t show up again, trading him for a good return will be all but impossible. Well, that’s were we now find ourselves. We have to sign him just to trade him and get something, or else there is an accumulated loss for the deadline moves (albeit, not truly harmful ones). Problem is, its now clear to every gm exactly what Flash is- a disappearing act, when it counts most. invisible at the Olympics, Invisible in the playoffs, no physical acumen, no defensive ability, no special teams ability unless he’s fed on the PP because he doesn’t really create much on his own, no PK skills what so ever… He’s a one trick pony and its a trick a lot of other players can pull off as well. He’s built for a league that plays half as many games and shies away from hitting.
I don’t want him on the team because he can’t play 3rd or 4th line duties and will just eat up a spot on the 2nd line. You have to bring him back to get something for him, or you let him walk. He’ll bring in a 4th round pick, or could be packaged to a GM in cap trouble and in need of some offensive without the dough to afford his upgrade.
Hate to say it (not really) but I knew he was going to be what he is when Detroit let him go.

by The Jade Donkey on May 14, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

actually, the reason i didn’t want him for the playoffs is because he doesn’t have the skills for playoff hockey; he doesn’t have the will to find a way. My point was that if he didn’t show up, and the caps didn’t win the cup, and he didn’t contribute to a victory, his stock would drop. Just to clarify.

by The Jade Donkey on May 14, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crickets.

The Fleischmann Lobby must be taking a three-martini lunch.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 1:42 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

The three-martini lunch will be followed by a period of low productivity.

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

The first martini they slam down no problem. The second one they sorta get through, but leave a good amount in the bottom of the glass and don’t even touch the olives. The third martini gets returned because it’s too hard to stomach.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i believe they started off their recaps strong, switched thier position in the middle, then faded off and are now eating nachos.

either that or they are still working out an agreement with the green lobby so neither side will savage the other….

Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...

by dcsportsfan1 on May 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well we know where they aren’t….in the corners.

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Or they’re realists.

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is that what separates them from the Semin Lobby?

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Depends – do you consider me in the Flash lobby?

"Don't mind WM...he's an all-around jerk."

by Whiter Mage on May 14, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh boy, I can’t wait for Semin’s rink wrap.

by Bushwood Bushwhacker on May 14, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’ll be smokin’!

"Stop hating and just accept the new Red Jesus into our life." --F&B on 14

by bigeugene on May 14, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
There’s a Fleishmann Lobby?

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 14, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Fleischmann Lobby has to work occasionally, too, y’know.

I don’t understand the people who say “he did what I expected him to do” and then admit they voted 4, or 2. Don’t the guidelines say the exact opposite?

I thought he’d regress. I thought last year was going to be as good as it got with him, and I expected no more. But he put up more goals, and more assists, in fewer games. That they tailed off later in the year is not a huge deal to me—wins in the first half count the same as wins in the second half.

So considering three years ago I thought he would never be an NHL regular, and now he’s a poor man’s Dan Quinn; to me that’s progress. So since 5 or 6 represents what was expected, and I expected 20-25-45 with negligible defense, I voted a 7. So there.

And it’s the Flash Bus (with plenty of room, by the way), not the Flash Lobby. A bus that the motherfucker threw me under only moments after I tried to defend him on this board, and then ran back and forth over me until he was mercifully benched for game seven.

Next time I’ll try to defend Jaro Halak.

by bilspacecadet on May 14, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

Recc’ed for bravery!

by RPI93 on May 14, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

5

the poll requires a 5 or 6 for what I expect. I expected pretty much this. Do I like this? Not really. Do I want Flash gone? Yes, but only for value be it picks or players. Do I see BB’s mancrush gone? Nope.

A danger to myself and others on the ice

by can't skate on May 14, 2010 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

4

Overall numbers about what one would expect, complete disappearing act in the playoffs part of the package

never let the truth get in the way of a good story

by toymechanic on May 14, 2010 1:58 PM EDT reply actions  

7

Hes an offensive player. And what did he do this year? Improved his offensive game setting career bests and earning more time on PP in which he was as excellent as one of the top 3 pivots in the entire league. How doesn’t that excel expectations. His stunts at center yeilded mixed results of greatness and pretty poor. Overall I’d still say his centering job wasn’t too bad for a winger to attempt though BB should of done a better job protecting a “weak” center like Flash from seasoned vets especially in the FO(or just attempt to keep Flash out of the FO altogether) but his FO trend seemed to be relatively good against team’s normal centers and very poorly against other team’s good FO centers.

Sure his defensive game could of been better. But I don’t expect much out of him in that regard. Do I want him to do better, yes.

I also pretty much wipe the slate of everyone in the playoffs because the team lost. Not any individual player. No matter how “poorly” a player did. Fact is flash is a 3rd line player and can’t be expected to regularly contribute in the playoffs, and most offensive production comes from the 1st and 2nd lines on every team.

while I’ll defend flash normally, I don’t have much motivation to defend anyone not playing in hockey in may.

Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."

by breaklance on May 14, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

he was as excellent as one of the top 3 pivots in the entire league.

False.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fact is flash is a 3rd line player and can’t be expected to regularly contribute in the playoffs, and most offensive production comes from the 1st and 2nd lines on every team.

Totally disagree. For starters, if he’s skating on the 2nd line, he’s a 2nd line player and has to be expected to regularly contribute in the playoffs. Secondly, if he’s not contributing offense… why the hell is he on an NHL roster?

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with all this and would just point out that bottom line contribution is indispensable for playoff success.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

No doubt, and that contribution is often as much in non-scoring areas as scoring, and we know that Flash doesn’t provide the former.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure his defensive game could of been better. But I don’t expect much out of him in that regard. Do I want him to do better, yes.

Backstrom, Semin, Ovechkin, all of these people have taken significant strides in their defensive play. In this system. Under this coach. And they’re all younger than Flash. When does it kick in, if it ever will?

They're coming.

by Bald Pollack on May 14, 2010 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

On the age front, Semin is actually older than Flash — by 2 months.

But point well taken. Semin, Ovi, and Backstrom have all improved their defensive abilities a great deal in the last few years.

Rocking the Red since 1975

by CapsFan75 on May 14, 2010 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

3

Didn’t expect a ton from him, but did expect him to take his game another step. He didn’t. There was a glimmer of hope early in the season but he went back to that same Flash and was utterly useless in the post-season. Same second half disappearing act, but without the pneumonia as an excuse this time. He’d get a 4 on the regular season alone but he loses another point for the playoffs. I didn’t think he’d go O-fer. If we factor in BB it probably goes to a 1, but that’s not Flash’s fault.

If I were GM I’d allocate 0 dollars to Flash this off-season. I’d love to try to get a second round pick for him at the draft. But he’ll get signed and dear God I hope it’s nothing higher than 1.5, though I suspect it might go to 2. He’ll fit in as another highly skilled but inconsistent and soft player. BB probably uses him as an X factor and play him in all situations. He’ll probably play W on the 2/3 and fill in as a C at times. Still a PP and PK player as well.

For him to get a 10 he’d have to not be Flash. It honestly doesn’t matter how many points he scores. If he doesn’t grow some stones and start playing a tougher game and bringing something to the table besides pure skill (which we have in abundance) then he won’t get a 10 from me.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:28 PM EDT reply actions  

I would laugh if Glen Sather signed him to a 3-4 million $ contract

"In the depths of winter, I learned there was in me an invincible summer" ~Albert Camus

by Madelle on May 14, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope Sather signs him to anything. I don’t think the Rags have the cap space to afford him at 3-4 mill, but I’d love it. They have to re-sign Staal this year and Callahan and Dubinsky next year. If he signs Flash, we poach.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why poach, if we WANT someone else to give us the draft pick(s)?

by six hole on May 14, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because those 3 are worth poaching.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, but it’s not like we’re seeking revenge. Just finally have the excuse to go poach. But if it wasn’t the Rags then we’d encourage teams to take our deadweight.

by six hole on May 14, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marc Staal is the only Staal brother than doesn’t make me want to punch him in the face.

#savethekittens!
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.

by RedBirdie on May 14, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

If we need someone to punch a Staal, we have our favorite Bongo player. :D

Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy

by MikeL-Pivonka on May 15, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

4

I wish I could have been surprised by his disappearing act at the end of the season and his inability to contribute anything other than points.

Next year I’m not even sure Flash is worth the roster spot he takes up, even at his current salary, and I’m even more sure he’s not worth that spot at a salary he is likely to accept. 50 pts is nice, but if he can’t do it in the playoffs he doesn’t help the team. They shouldn’t just ditch him for nothing, but I would like to see GMGM move Flash before next season.

Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst

by Killer_Carlson on May 14, 2010 2:34 PM EDT reply actions  

To be honest, we have enough depth on the team and in the organization that, combined with BB’s attitude, losing Flash for nothing might be one of the rare cases of addition by subtraction.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

The voting on Flash is an almost perfect bell curve.

by b.orr4 on May 14, 2010 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Rotate it counter-clockwise 90 degrees and it matches his production this season.

All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again

by sydtron on May 14, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

nice.

proud 4th line advocate

by iced on May 14, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kind of like real life for the rest of us, isn’t it?

by b.orr4 on May 14, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

4

He should absolutely be moved this summer. The only reason I might think otherwise is if he’s open to signing a cap-friendly multi-year contract. Otherwise, the time to sell is now. Sure, he’s RFA but he’s also arbitration-eligible. If he wants to press for a significant raise this summer, the avenue for him to do so is there. I have no faith if that were to happen that he’d be making something in line with his actual worth to the team. I don’t even know where to slot the guy in next season.

This is one of the problems with such an offensive-minded team. Scoring-line forwards are going to make out like bandits in arbitration if they choose to do so. Fleischmann, in particular, puts up offensive numbers that aren’t indicative of his worth to the team or his all-around value as a player.

by Langway on May 14, 2010 3:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Great points about arb, and too true – guys who don’t put up sexy stats get boned, guys who don’t do anything else get paid.

On the plus side, Schultzie should be cheap (at least if it wasn’t for that dead-sexy plus-minus).

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on May 14, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s the one and only advantage of a first-round exit, almost every player who’s an RFA probably lost about 10% off their contract demands..except for Backstrom.

by b.orr4 on May 14, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I meant to add if the Caps had gone to the Finals or won a Cup.

by b.orr4 on May 14, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

guys who don’t put up sexy stats get boned

Shamo agrees.

I waited all year for this?

by Rob Parker on May 14, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

5

20 goal season and a fade out in the playoffs. Exactly as expected.

Would love to know if a Flash for Hamhuis trade was ever an actual possibility and if so, who balked. Who knows if that would have changed things, but it couldn’t have been worse.

by Stormblue on May 14, 2010 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

The first half of the season, dude was on fire. He was putting up points seemingly every game, and was just a force on offense. I’d give him an 8 for that part of the season.

The second half of the season he predictably slid, which is unfortunate. You need scorers who can consistantly tickle the twine, and Flash was not doing that. I’d give him a 4 for that part of the season.

Flash was pretty bad in the playoffs too. His slide continued, and he was even a healthy scratch in the pivotal game 7. Being a 20+ goal scorer, and being on the shelf when your team has had issues scoring in the series…that’s a pretty telling sign. I’d give him a 2 for the playoffs.

Average those three together, and we’re at 4.67, round up to a 5. But he loses a point because, really, at this point in his career, he should be expected to be advancing his game. Getting better. And he’s still basically the same streaky player who he was last season. I expected him to get better, and he did not. So, yeah, I’ll round up to a 4 and call it good.

The Caps can probably find someone to trade a pick for him (2nd or 3rd) because of his scoring numbers. If GMGM can do that, I’d say do it. The Caps can find enough scoring, and more consistant scoring, elsewhere.

This is where we hold them! This is where we fight! This is where they die! Remember this day, men, for it will be yours for all time.

by ZeroIndulgence on May 14, 2010 4:44 PM EDT reply actions  

7
He needs 30/35/65 and to not get knocked off the puck every damn time to get a 10 next year. And get off the damn PK.

5 next year is somewhere in the neighborhood of 17/20/37, playing a bit more consistently over the course of the season.

Production a bit above baseline, but he still has a lot of the problems he’s had the past few seasons. He’s also not going to have a 19.0% shooting percentage next year, you can book that (it was 11% in his career prior to last season).

He did get better staying on the puck, but I’m leaving the 10 criteria for next season at pretty much the same level. He needs to get better on defense and penalty +/- next

Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps?

While he’s a quality NHL player, I hope he doesn’t. I think he’s replaceable on this team and hope he gets moved as a part for a 2C or as something we can trade to get a 2C. He’s also going to rapidly get paid more than he’s worth to this team, in my estimation.

-d

by meep_42 on May 14, 2010 4:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps?

Please God, just make him go away.

If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak.

by Hang a Laingtern on Your Problems on May 14, 2010 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Gave him a 4

His regular season was what I expected numbers-wise. I was hoping for more this playoff year and got the same old shit. So a 4, really could have justified it down to a 3 or 2.

As for next year…heh…if you want to win 60 games in the regular season, Flash can help you do that. If you want to win the Stanley Cup, not so much. Time to cut bait on ol’ Tomas.

by wittcap79 on May 15, 2010 12:20 AM EDT reply actions  

5

Poor Flash – nobody likes him.
Replace him with somebody better, OK.
Otherwise, get off his case.

падение шайбу!

by stevie LL on May 16, 2010 1:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Replace him with somebody better, OK.

who are you talking to?

by Natty Bumppo on May 16, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

No one in particular, just a general statement.
Sorry for the poor choice of words.

падение шайбу!

by stevie LL on May 16, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Discussion: As a restricted free agent, how much (in dollars and years) should the Caps be willing to commit to Fleischmann this summer? Where does he fit in on the 2010-11 Caps? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?

Zero, Nad, nichts; it’s time to trade his rights for whatever they can get relative to this years draft.

He doesn’t fit on the 2010-2011 Capitals, his ATOI of 16:00+ was totally unwarranted in the second half of the season and the playoffs. He steals ice time and a roster slot from someone in the pipeline who might fit. He is a totally one way player – offense, and is streakey in spades. “Flash” is what people allege of Semin. They can get something for him from a team who needs cost effective offense and already has defense in spades like … oh say Boston….

What will it take for him to be a 10 – I don’t think it’s even in him to do it in a Capitals Sweater. I don’t hate him, he just doesn’t fit. He needs to go somewhere where he can be a 2nd line left wing and work on his two way game. That’s not with the 2010-2011 Capitals…

by markbona-capsfan99 on May 18, 2010 9:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators