2009-10 Rink Wrap: Joe Corvo
From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading (please read the criteria below) the 2009-10 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2010-11. Next up, Joe Corvo.
Key Stat: Joe Corvo logged only the fifth-most ATOI and ATOI at 5-on-5 amongst Caps' defensemen in the first round series vs. Montreal.
Interesting Stat: He played more than 26 minutes per night in half of the first 26 games to start the season for Carolina before suffering a terrifying injury on November 30, 2009: a slice into his calf by Karl Alzner's skate that required more than 100 stitches.
The Good: Corvo rebounded after suffering that injury enough to parlay his performance into a role with the league's top regular season team. With the Capitals, he showed flashes of the type of offensive skill and smart decision making on the attack that could have served the Caps well during a deep playoff run. Coaches so often preach the type of "throw it on net through traffic" play that Corvo made to score in Game 1 vs. Montreal, but few execute. And Corvo's oft-cited blast from the slot in Game 6 that Jaroslav Halak snared with the leather goes in those nine other times out of ten. Ah, well.
It took him a while for the coaching staff to find the best pair mate for him. A stint alongside Tom Poti turned ugly, as neither defender is a frequent banger along the boards, each instead playing similar roles of moving the puck up ice once loosed from an opponent. But pairing Corvo with Shaone Morrisonn revealed more of the former's effectiveness (and covered some of his deficiencies).
Corvo proved to be quite disciplined, committing just one minor penalty in 18 regular season Capitals games (though committed two in the post-season). He also protected the puck well in the regular season, finishing, in those 18 games, with far and away the best minutes-per-giveaway of all the team's D.
Finally, he also provided (in theory, anyway) sorely-needed experience to the Caps' blueline. Once Poti went down in Game 6, Corvo became the most-seasoned Caps' defender with 486 NHL games played.
The Bad: Joe Corvo was perhaps the most controversial of the Capitals' trade deadline acquisitions, instigating vigorous debate here and elsewhere. Not so much for what GM George McPhee dealt away to put him in a Caps' sweater -- Oskar Osala scored 2 goals and 1 assist in eight Calder Cup playoff games, for those keeping score -- but for whether the rearguard, who boldly wears #77, adequately fulfilled the team's need for a top four defender. Reviewing our expectations from our trade deadline roundtable, Corvo turned out to be neither the "clear upgrade" over the dealt Brian Pothier that was sought, nor did he "eat up minutes of some other top four D," especially some of the heavy workload of Mike Green.
Instead, Corvo spent the fewest minutes on ice during the post-season of any Caps' defender not named Shaone. Including just 12:51 TOI during pivotal Game 5. And against mostly weaker competition. Part of his lack of top four minutes can be attributed to the rise of John Carlson. But, regardless, Corvo was brought in to be more than a third pair defender, and one who saw virtually no PK time. What's worse, he ended up earning himself the worst +/- on the team with that ice time, one that outscored its opponents 68 to 51 in games in which Corvo played.
Finally, he, incidentally, became a prominent new addition to a PP unit -- averaging the second-most PP time amongst D-men -- that scored but once in thirty-three opportunities, after leading the NHL in PP efficiency during the regular season. Coincidence? There's plenty of blame to go around for that extra man futility, but the results don't speak well for someone acquired to make the league's top PP even more dangerous.
The Vote: Rate Corvo below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the post-trade portion of his season - if he had the best season as a Capital that you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst season you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
The Discussion: As Corey pointed out, Coach Bruce Boudreau seemed to have lost confidence in Joe Corvo as his time in D.C. wore on, someone about whom Coach spoke so highly after the trade deadline deal. What happened to the Joe Corvo that carried Carolina on the PP in 2008-09? Did lingering effects of his calf injury play any role? Is there any reasonable contract on which player and club can -- and should -- agree, when Corvo may wind up being a third pair defenseman in 2010-11?
85 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Directions
Rate Corvo below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the post-trade portion of his season – if he had the best season as a Capital that you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst season you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
#NeedsMoreBradley
by Addison H. on May 11, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions 6 recs
Maybe I’m being harsh but he gets a 2 from me; probably should be a three. He didn’t do anything I had hoped he would (provide O, improved PP, eat top 4 minutes).
But grace can still be found within the gale. With fear and reverence, raise your ragged sail.
by Steckel Me Elmo on May 11, 2010 11:05 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t think we will ever be satisfied with our defensemen.
proud 4th line advocate
by iced on May 11, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
We’re spoiled from the late 1980s when the half the Caps’ defensemen were on their way to Hall of Fame careers: Langway, Murphy and Stevens. Since then, we can count the number of Hall of Fame defensmen the Caps have had on one finger (Gonchar) with a tiny little bit of a second finger for Fedorov…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 11, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
exactly my point, I don’t think Caps fans will be satisfied till we have Al MacInnis on our blue line.
proud 4th line advocate
I’ll pass on MacInnis. I think he’s lost a step or three ;)
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory
by Rather Bengt on May 11, 2010 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions
aren’t defensemen supposed to defend?
The Farm report is DA Bomb... read it, rec it, love it ....
by TheFuryUnleashed on May 11, 2010 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I expected more out of Brian Pothier’s replacement, and didn’t get an upgrade of any sort.
Photography: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
3
Thought on many nights he was our worst defender.
didn’t use his body/broad shoulders to position attackers off the puck or punish them into the boards…immediately when i saw him on the ice…this is what i wanted….too many ill advised passes and turnovers…very light offensive production…very below expectations on a trade deadline acquistion/upgrade
moved up from a 2 to a 3 because i thought he was significantly better in the post season than in the reg. season…like corvo’s game a little more…we don’t have room for it here though. bye, joe…good luck!
Gave him a 3 because we’re rating the coaches separately from this.
Guessing his contract (and perhaps the desire to keep one of the other less pricey UFAs) makes him a goner.
They're coming.
I think that there’s a combination of performance plus general mismanagement that is probably saving me from giving him a higher score. So I’m copping out and running with the pack.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on May 11, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Embarrasing, really.
2, and this reflects both our GM’s decision to bring him here, the ROLE he was expected to fill per said GM, and his inability to do so.
Didn’t like the move before, don’t like it now. He didn’t lower Green’s minutes, he looked lost, and never meshed.
Now I’ll just have a reason to watch Carolina games when he signs again down there.
Gave him a 5
I didn’t like this trade when it happened as he was not a significant upgrade over Pothier – so I had minimal expectations of him. And he met my expectations with a very pedestrian performance.
What more can I say? This is what the Caps do every spring.
5- not a player i had followed much before he came on board. i remember when the trade went down, JP was trying to remember if “uh-oh” corvo was his nickname in ottawa. thus, my expectaions were low. i’d say he did about as expected, which is not good for a deadline deal guy whose going to be a UFA. those guys are supposed to exceed expectations.
he got off to a bad defensive start. chalk it up to new system and new partner. it improved but the offensive side never took off. he obviously didnt help the PP in the post season. his playoff goal was one highlight amongst a generally average performance. who knows if osala will turn out to be anything, and pots was a UFA too, but the extra second round pick tossed in makes this a bad trade in hindsight (obviously). if you include trade value in the evaluation, then i would say he’s a 4.
i see no reasonable scenario where bringing him back makes sense.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
3
My expectations were fairly low, as I was not a fan of the deal to begin with, and he failed to live up to even those meager expectations I had. Was brought in to be a 3/4 defenseman, and turned out to be a 5/6 D, and not even very good at that. Probably should have gotten a 2, the more I think about it. Just an absolute disappointment in every sense.
Lingering effects from the injury may have played a role in him not being able to crack our top 4 d-men, but I think more likely his skillset just wasn’t a good match for what we needed in a defenseman. There is no way he should be on this team next year.
I gave him a 3, I was thinking of giving him a 2 but he improved after he had a better D partner so it shouldn’t all be on him. I don’t see him being back next year but if he is to get a ten he would have to get second most min on PP among the D, and have 10-15 goals and 40-45 points and top-4 min.
"Ovechkin is as subtle as a shot of vodka."
4
He was solid, but needed to contribute more in every situation. Hardly any offense and not much TOI relief, as you mentioned, Pepper. But he was responsible in the minutes he did get and if nothing else kept Sloan out.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Whoops
Kept both of Sloan and Alzner out, from playing at the same time that is. A rookie who hadn’t played all that well plus a not-so-good guy…thank you JC77.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on May 11, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d give him a 3 for his performance and dumb plays early compared to the organizations hype about him, and a weak 6 for showing flashes of his offensive talents later. Gotta go with a 4 overall.
I was very unhappy with his play early on, and would have greatly preferred Pothier as I thought Pothier was a better defenseman than the avg fan.
I thought he demonstrated the ability to get off a sharp shot on net as fast as any of our defensemen – and a lot faster than Green – in a playoff series where half our shots were getting blocked, and had more lateral maneuverability on the PP. (Green being the fast-break wizard).
I said previously I thought Corvo tipped the scales for the team to too much risk, not enough reward on D. We really don’t need need both Green and Corvo, esp with Carlson and Alzner/an acquired veteran stay at home guy.
4
I’m not as upset about the lack of scoring as much as I was having seen a guy that just didn’t seem to express a lot of hockey sense.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on May 11, 2010 11:42 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
3
Didn’t like the initial trade and he fell quite a bit below my expectations both offensively and in terms of eating up minutes.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 11:42 AM EDT reply actions
6
I was bitter that Pots was traded, and expected him to suck horribly. He didn’t suck horribly, so he performed above my expectations.
"If you want money go to the bank, if you want bread go to the bakery if you want goals go to the net." - #21
3's a magic number
didn’t produce. was not an upgrade over pothier, should have kept him. Didn’t have a good season at all and was a risky pickup because of it; when a player tells you he still isn’t 100% and won’t be till next season, it makes you wonder what sense there was in picking him up. Didn’t like the trade and it didn’t get any better.
for a ten he’d need to actually become a dominant player. He’ll be doing it in another city. Interesting that it appears BB lost faith in Corvo. Was he really used properly? He was on a failing PP far too long. He was better in the playoffs, which means nothing as it was a 1st round exit.
The one thing Corvo highlights is that the Caps are still looking for chemistry on lines 2-4 and d pairs 1-3. Is it because Its not there or because BB can’t let chemistry develop before he has to change things again? Did Corvo get a chance to develop chemistry on the team, or was he shuffled too much early on?
He’ll get 3-3.5 million. too much for us, we don’t need him, I’d keep juice over corvo.
by The Jade Donkey on May 11, 2010 11:52 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Three
Corvo should have been a clear upgrade over Pothier, and wasn’t. For next year: do. not. want.
by RPI93 on May 11, 2010 11:59 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Three. Based on his play in Carolina, I thought we were getting at least a top four defenseman instead of a top six guy. That aside, I thought he was a little mishandled by Boudreau who couldn’t seem to find the right place/partner for him. The Caps likely won’t resign him and, frankly, I don’t think Corvo would want to come back.
3
I had low expectations for him, other than the 100mph shot he has, and he failed to meet even those. He had only a few good games after the deadline. In the playoffs, he looked like someone who had never been there before (he was on Ottawa in 2007, so he went to the Finals, and last year he went to the Eastern Finals.)
I don’t think there is a contract here for him in 2010-11, unless he’s willing to take a 50-60% pay cut. I wouldn’t bet on it. Someone out there (Edmonton, Dallas, Anaheim) will toss some $$ his way and he’l be gone.
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
2
I expected good puck moving, good PP quarterbacking, and decent defense. He was a lot worse than I expected.
I would not bring him back, truthfully.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
3
expected more offense, expected more help on the PP, just expected more in general.
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
On the other hand, he outscored Green in the playoffs…
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
I think this says a lot about what grade we will give Green, even though he had another great regular season.
by reesem37 on May 11, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
3
He would’ve been a 2 if not for a passable playoff performance and the fact that he did improve with us over time. But for a guy who was billed to be a sure top-4 and someone who was immediately supposed to become our 2nd or 3rd best D, he was a massive disappointment. I guess it all depends on what your expectations were. Mine were pretty high.
The lack of hockey sense that Peerless pointed out was indeed the most disappointing aspect. Remember all those odd-man rushes he misplayed? Or the missed assignments?
And for as much as we talk about his improvement towards the end, he played less than Alzner or Carlson in game seven, unless I’m missing something. Weak.
It's annoying how close everyone votes, 4
I had supremely high expectations for Corvo and I was let down somewhat. He wasn’t a bust, but he wasn’t the guy to fix the defense. I’d love him back year, and I’d love to give him a 10 if here were to have a 60, 70 point season while registering a top 10% for the team +/- against quality ice time against quality opponents.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
It’s annoying how close everyone votes, 4
So… you annoy yourself?
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 11, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Seems I do. It’s like this blog has reasonably educated readers, even if they’re 50% assholes
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
Do you seriously expect him to have anywhere near those types of numbers? He’s never even sniffed at those totals in his career and he’d be playing second fiddle to Green if he re-signed here.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Not at all, those are Green’s level of numbers which is what I’d have to see in order to give the guy a 10 rating next year. Given his salary and being on the wrong side of 30, he’s going to have to put up some insane numbers for the trade to look good in retrospect. I still think he’s worth re-signing, but I don’t really see rating him next year any higher than a 7 coming in with expectations of him being second fiddle to Green.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
My bad. I misread your post.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I rated Corvo a 3. I was expecting a significant upgrade on the blueline over Pothier, but I felt it was only marginal. I appreciated his touted puck handling skills in the regular season, but I did not notice Corvo making the same effective passes out of the defensive zone in the playoffs. In fact, the moment that stands out most to me in this department is in game one when he launched a half-rink pass that led to the turnover that lost the game in OT. That alone swayed me from a 4 to a 3. His puck moving ability was definitely a positive overall, but Pothier was no slouch there either.
Corvo’s offensive numbers were bad with Washington, but they were bad with Carolina as well. It looked like he was having an off year in scoring, so I was not exactly expecting him to be a huge offensive upgrade. His ATOI in Carolina was 25:13, and over the course of his career he has logged an average of 20:35 minutes per game. 19:41 in the regular season is acceptable given his place in the depth chart, but 16:53 in the playoffs is definitely a disappointment. On the positive side, Corvo only had a total of six PIMs and two giveaways in his time here, so he was significantly more disciplined than Pothier (and most of the team, for that matter).
Overall, Corvo was a pickup designed to provide defensive depth for a team on a long playoff run. It is hard to say how he would have contributed had the team progressed further. I do not expect Corvo to return next season, and I cannot think of a contract that would make him palatable given that he currently makes more money than all but Green and Poti. Also, my expectation is for both Carlson and Alzner to spend significant time in D.C. next season, so roster space will (hopefully) be limited. It would be interesting to see if Corvo could bounce back from disappointing and injury-shortened season while spending a full year in the Caps’ system; however, that $2.6 mil can be used more effectively elsewhere.
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on May 11, 2010 12:33 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
In sum, to call [Corvo] a one-dimensional would mislead the reader by implying there is an area of his game that is particularly strong.
I dunno why I thought of this line when it came to voting…
I gave him a 4.. My expectations weren’t exactly high for him.. he did mostly what I expected but I was hoping for a little more offense on the PP.
by JustJeff on May 11, 2010 12:35 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
That’s a bit unfair. Corvo is an above-average offensive defenseman. He had an off year but his offense and PP ability are definitely a strong points.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Rec’d for the subject line…
Washington Capitals 2009-10 = Quebec Nordiques 1994-95
--- D'ohboy
by MikeL-Pivonka on May 11, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Corvo = Less minutes for Green?
GMGM could have acquired Bobby Orr and I still think Green would play the same amount of minutes if BB is the coach. If at 1 for 20 on the pp you dont cut back a guy that has a bum wrist like Green, when would you?
3
Had very low expectations but certainly thought he would do atleast as much as Pothier, not sure that was the case.
Bruce seems to want offensive defensemen but than doesn’t trust them enough to put them on the ice
never let the truth get in the way of a good story
3
I like Joe Corvo, and thought he was a pretty good pickup. But he didn’t really pan out in his short time in DC. Mostly, he should have been able to score on the pp, and help that be an effective unit, but he really didn’t help it at all. He’s somewhat of a liability on the D end, but it’s awful. But, overall, just really didn’t play up to either my expectations, or even nearly what he’s capable of.
I can’t see him coming back. The Caps need a defensive minded defenseman. They have enough puck movers.
This is where we hold them! This is where we fight! This is where they die! Remember this day, men, for it will be yours for all time.
5
I gave him a low 5 in that I felt he was basically a plan C at the trade deadline but while we may have overspent with the draft choice, I don’t think Pothier or Osala were parts that could have contributed any more than Corvo did (and I liked Potsy). Would have liked to see him score more but his skating and puck moving skills were good when carrying out of the zone. He did get himself terribly out of position at times (the Game 1 OT winner Plekanec scored comes to mind) which isn’t befitting a veteran D. Also he didn’t utilize that booming shot I was expecting.
I though he was hit and miss in the post season. He looked good at the point and actually got his shot through at times. But he made some defensive lapses (again mainly positioning) which screwed us at times.
To get a 10 next year…nahh he’s not gonna be here next year so it doesn’t matter.
One last note: Although I am not really a fan of either player I will miss teaming him with ShaMo for the “Joe ShMo” defensive pairing
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory
2
I liked the trade and expected a hell of a lot more from Corvo. I expected a lot more offensively, not just in points, but in getting his shots to the net as well. His shots per game plummeted with the Caps and aside from his 10 shot game he didn’t do a great job getting shots through traffic against Montreal. He also didn’t eat up the minutes that I had hoped he would. While he wasn’t terrible defensively, he was way too indecisive at times and it really cost him and the Caps (like in OT of Game 1). Overall just a very disappointing tenure with the Caps.
I still think he is a lot better than he showed with the Caps. I wouldn’t mind him back on the team, but he’d have to take a pay cut from his current salary. I don’t see that happening though. I wish I could say it was nice knowing you, Joe.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on May 11, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
5
As I spent a considerable amount of time watching him in Carolina before the trade, this is exactly what I was expecting from him.
I think that we would have been more pleased with him if we could have seen how he performed in a long playoff run…but yea.
proud 4th line advocate
I gave him a 6: after a shaky start here, he started to get back to where he was in Carolina once he had a steadier pairing with ShaMo. I did start to hope he would raise his game to the level of his teammates — there were moments when I remember being surprised by his ability — but this was less an expectation than a very faint wish. (Conditioned to players not being ‘there’ all the time.) If he does come back next season, which I doubt, he’ll need to work on being less skittish around others on ice and use his speed and strength to plow through the opposition.
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
3
i don’t have as much analysis in me for corvo. i expected him to be a difference maker; he wasn’t.
I gave him a 4 but it probably should have been a 3. He wasn’t as good as I expected on either end of the ice. I don’t think he was as bad defensively as he’s being made out to be, but he wasn’t as good as Alan Ryder had him in 08-09 either. I do think he was a clear upgrade on Potsy, but that isn’t enough.
I think if he took a huge pay-cut he could come back, but I don’t see it happening. Maybe he would sign a 1 year deal like BMo to rehab his post-injury reputation. I think next year he’ll be better than he was for us, and I do think the injury hindered him a little bit. We do need to sign another D for next season but it’s not our most pressing need and I’m pretty sure we can do it cheaper. Depending on the money, Juice or Shamo is probably a better option.
I waited all year for this?
Juice could be a better poor man’s Green which is what you really need. Hell, Carlson could step up be a poor man’s Green very late next season and Juice is easily a poor man’s Corvo. If they can grab him for cheap on a year, get him. What’s the definition of cheap for Corvo though? 2.25ish or so?
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
Juice is definitely not a poor man’s Green or a poor man’s Corvo. Carlson will be our second best Offensive-D next season so that at least covers a puck mover on two pairs. Juice is by no means a puck mover. He has a shot but he can’t use it effectively and he’s slow as molasses. 2.25 would be the absolute high end of what you can give Juice, and it’s still probably too much; on the other hand, it’s probably the absolute low end of what Corvo makes, and it still might be too much for us to afford. Though I think having Corvo probably makes us the better team. Green/Schultz, Poti/Carlson, Alzner/Corvo is pretty well balanced and should allow an even spread of minutes (which BB won’t use).
I waited all year for this?
I might disagree with the individual pairings. I figure Green and Schultz will be left together. And they may pair the two rookies, Alzner and Carlson, since they were great together in Hershey. If they keep Corvo, he’s probably remain with Poti but our two Italians may not have been a good pairing.
Rocking the Red since 1975
I meant 2.25 for Corvo, and for Juice I was thinking he could get away with creating offense, just not counting on him getting it out of our own end.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
which, of course, is odd since I think the worst part of the Caps’ D game is the inability to possess the puck out of the zone instead of dump it out.
Wishful thinking on my part to see Jurcina do something with that shot I guess, and maybe a bit of overstating his ability to literally see the ice
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again
Loved the move at the time, because I thought he was a clear upgrade over Pothier without moving any truly valuable assets.
I really expected him to shine once he adjusted to our system and become our second best defenseman. I completely drank the Kool-Aid on that one.
And whether or not you attribute some of the failure to Bruce and company’s handling of him, if he’d been better, he would have found his way onto the ice. He just wasn’t very good.
So, Joe gets a very disappointing 2 from me.
4
I was going to grade him lower but remembered he had more goals in the playoffs than Green, Semin and Fleishmann combined.
I believe in JC.
by patred48 on May 11, 2010 3:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
4
John Erskine has better value than Corvo. Gave up way too much for this guy in the trade. Way too much.
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.
Corvo’s a streaky guy who thrives only with confidence (see his disappearance last year vs. Pittsburgh in the ECF). It’s too bad, b/c he can be a great weapon when on his game.
One thing I will disagree with, from a Carolina perspective:
Not so much for what GM George McPhee dealt away to put him in a Caps’ sweater- Oskar Osala scored 2 goals and 1 assist in eight Calder Cup playoff games, for those keeping score -
Osala went 10-3-13 in 16 regular season games with Albany. Showing his playoff stats seems selective — that’s like grading Mike Green only on postseason performance.
Overall, good assessment. I’m surious to see where Joe winds up this offseason — I’m guessing a small market team, maybe Phoenix.
hmm … dunno why I got strikethru there, but OK.
by Cory Lavalette on May 11, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
its a formatting quirk that occurs if you place two dashes within the same paragraph
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit in a tin-foil hat
Donation info for SAVES FOR KIDS 2010!! Make a difference.
Corvo definitely strikes me as a streaky player and I think you are onto something with the confidence observation. I think Corvo had a similar thing happen when he was with OTT; he was good-to-great for the EC playoffs and then became a disaster for ANA (along with the rest of the team) in the SCF. Didn’t he also start last year extremely slowly and then pick it up and finish with pretty solid numbers?
Osala has tantalizing size and hands but his skating is pretty terrible. I think Caps fans are still divided on whether he’ll pan out. You’re right that his regular season production should be noted, but I’d also point out that he had a chance to stick with the big club and really didn’t do anything at all. He’s still young, but you’d hope he’d at least be able to crack the NHL roster for the last part of the season.
I waited all year for this?
This is what I was trying to get at by using “skittish” to describe him. He seems to be a little less solid than other players in his profile (if that makes any sense). What frustrates me most about Corvo — and quite a few other players — is the yo-yo quality of play based on intangibles in someone that should be consistently above-average based on talent/ability.
Looks like I picked the wrong season to stop sniffing glue.
4
Didn’t make much of an impression on me,
don’t see him as an upgrade over Pothier.
Я смотрю на вас всех видеть, что любви не спит
в то время как моя гитара нежно плачет (Джордж Харрисон)
This was one of my biggest problems with Corvo. He was a slight upgrade offensively when he was supposed to be a clear upgrade and defensively he wasn’t as good. It’s not like BB gave Corvo the kind of minutes that we expected him to get, so why not stick with Pothier who is more suited to getting the minutes of a #4 or 5 defenseman anyway?
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on May 11, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
4
Debated between a 3 and 4…went with the (generous) 4 because I think a lot of his lack of production/presence was due to mismanagement (as mentioned earlier). I think he did OK given the situation, although considering he was really the only D-man we got at the trade (Juice doesn’t count) I would have liked a lot more out of him. Whether those higher expectations were realistic or not for Corvo, I’m not hockey savy enough to say.
Every time the Swedish Swashbuckler scores a goal, an angel gets its wings.

by



































