Bears 6, Crunch 1
The Bears-Crunch game on Saturday night was very entertaining. The first frame saw the Bears up 1-0 from a Boyd Kane goal (assisted by Patrick Wellar and Keith Aucoin) 1:07 into the game. Jay Beagle followed that at 12:30 with a beautiful, unassisted, shorthanded goal, extending the Bears' lead to 2-0. That shorthanded goal would go on to be the game winner. In the second frame, Alexandre Giroux notched another goal, assisted by Patrick McNeil and Keith Aucoin) and then the Crunch finally snuck one past Michal Neuvirth. It would be their only tally.
Jay Beagle would answer that goal, assisted by Perreault and Helmer, and then the Bears were off to the races, with Zach Miskovic (assisted by Kane and Greg Amadio) and Karl Alzner (assisted by Miskovic and Perreault) providing the final two goals.
Referee Nygel Pelletier was kept extremely busy in this game, with a total of 31 penalties called, including three at one time (plus a 10-minute misconduct) for Crunch LW Kevin Harvey (roughing, tripping, and charging) at 15:26 of the 2nd frame. Harvey would return to add another unsportsmanlike conduct charge to his rap sheet in the third frame.
Photos from the game will be below the jump.

If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great pics, thanks for sharing. Saw you mention you had a new camera…what’d you get? What lens were you shooting these with?
I like the Washington Capitals.
I got a Canon EOS 7D digital SLR.
These were shot with the Canon 55-250mm IS (image stabilization) lens.
There’s almost no grain, even at full sized (which, at 18 megapixels, is effing gynormous!) and ISO 2000. It’s taking some adjusting on my part – I can shoot 8 frames/second, but I have to time it so that I’m catching the release of the shot more than the setup, because the camera has to take some time to process what it’s captured, but once I get the timing down, this thing is going to be fantastic for playoffs.
I can’t say enough, though, about my decision to get a battery grip to go with it. The big advantage (apart from putting two batteries in the camera at once and only using 23% of them on the entire hockey game plus warmups) is that when I shoot a portrait style (vertical) shot, I can shift my grip so that I don’t have to put my elbow over my head to get the shot; I can brace just like doing landscape, and the buttons are all in the same place.
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
That is an amazing camera! I’m envious. I have that same lens on my XSi, it’s a great lens for the price.
The 7D’s 8fps shooting is insane…I was impressed w/ the 3.5fps my camera has until that came out.
Is that your first outing with it?
Congratulations on that purchase!
I like the Washington Capitals.
Thanks!
That was my first hockey game with it, so the 1,587 shots I took only netted 27 that I considered “good enough to post,” but unlike with the Sony Alpha 100 I used to use, the majority were because it wasn’t “the right photo,” rather than because it was fuzzed, or too grainy, or anything like that.
I like being able to be picky based on where a guy’s eyes are looking, rather than on whether the eyes are in focus in the image or not. Those two closeups of Varlamov? I can count eyelashes in the full-sized image. (And that boy has some THICK eyelashes!)
The 55-250 IS lens really is fantastic. The battery grip is still taking some getting used to, but it’s sure saving my elbow when I’m using it, and I’m remembering to use it a lot more frequently, the more I shoot with the camera. I’ll get the timing down yet!
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
Lens
Do you shoot manual indoors or just use the sports setting? I take mostly outdoor action shots so am always looking for advice on indoor sports shooting.
Oh, and for $100 you can rent this for a week:
http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon-28-300mm-f3.5-5.6-l-is/for-canon
Canon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS

I like the Washington Capitals.
It depends on what I’m shooting. :-)
Nice lens, but I can’t hand-hold a lens that huge, nor could I walk boldfaced into the Verizon Center carrying it, since it’s a professional lens and obviously looks like one (though with the press pass I carry in Hershey, I could there)… My elbows would sue for separate maintenance! ;-)
For hockey, what I do is I shoot the ice a few times before warm-ups to get my white balance set right, and usually when I’m actively shooting, I let the camera make most of the decisions, because hockey just plain moves too fast for me to be doing that, and framing my shots, and paying attention to exposure…
The one decision I make for the camera is that I will typically set the aperture (somewhere around f/11 on this camera), rather than the shutter speed or both, because I’ve run into problems where if the aperture is too wide, and I focus on center mass of the player, I lose his face. (Of course, that was on the Sony, which was not designed for sports. I have not had that problem with the Canon – yet.)
The Canon does do a lot of ISO graininess clean-up, which helps; the shots I posted this morning were all shot at ISO 2000 or thereabouts, and I couldn’t do that with the Sony – they’d be grainy as hell.
Without image stabilization, most people can’t typically hand-hold a lens for a length of time any longer than about half the focal length of the lens. For example, shooting at 300mm, you wouldn’t want a shutter speed any slower than 1/150 of a second. Approximately. With image stabilization, I have hand-held for much longer, but a long shutter speed isn’t desirable for stop-motion photography anyway.
With all digital photography, expose for the highlights, NOT the shadows. You can always bring out shadow detail in the digital darkroom; you can’t put it back in when it isn’t there. A digital image is equivalent to a slide in that regard, rather than a negative; it’s a positive image.
I tend to frame just a little looser than I normally would, and crop in the digital darkroom, because I’d rather do that than lose part of the image to tight cropping. I also tend to shoot upwards of 500 images during warmups alone, and worry about culling them later. Looser framing allows me to focus on the center mass of the player, unless I’m shooting a tight closeup of his face (like the ones of Varlamov above). I very seldom have time to review pictures during the game, and since I carry a pretty big memory card (16 GB compact flash in the Canon), I have not needed to cull images – remove the really truly bad ones – during the course of a game. Generally, I’d carry at least 8 GB for an indoor sporting event if I plan to shoot a lot – and I do shoot a LOT.
Drop me an e-mail at irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com if you want to yakk about this more! :-)
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
by IRockTheRed on Apr 5, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I’m going to rec this comment because there is more knowledge of photography in here than I could ever hope to learn. Great pics.
"We are such fans of your music and all of your records. I'm not speaking of yours personally, but the whole genre of the rock and roll."
by Laich It Or Lump It on Apr 6, 2010 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, the higher ISO settings the 7D can achieve are nice. At 800 ISO you’re really at the end of the XSi’s utility. It goes up to 1600 but I’ve never even used that since even 800 is so borderline.
Good advice on shooting the ice to set the white balance, I wouldn’t have thought to do that.
I’m volunteering you to do a Fan Post about Photography for Hockey Fans. I think we could all learn a lot from you, cobracg, and others who shoot indoors a lot.
Yes, I also have learned to just take 100s of shots. I carry an 8gb card, two 4gb cards, and a 2gb just in case. And if you get 3-5% keepers, consider it a lucky day. :)
I like the Washington Capitals.
And if you get 3-5% keepers, consider it a lucky day.
This is the biggest advantage to shooting digital that I know. With film, you can shoot a couple hundred shots, but you’re also looking at the expense of processing, printing, etc., and that goes real high real fast.
Last night, I had 67 shots that I could not possibly use, and it’s good that I actually looked at the camera, because I’d bumped one of the settings, and they were all black. If I’d been shooting film and not noticed that, I would have been soooo mad at myself when I got the pix back!
I’ll write that fan post today. :-)
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
Your wish...
is my command. Enjoy!
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com
Great shots! Definite wallpaper material here.. I’ll have to make a chocolate and white version of my Perreault backdrop at some point.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Thanks! Let me know if you want full-sized, and I’ll try to e-mail them to you. I may have to cut them down a little due to hugeness, but… would love to see some wallpaper!
Blog: I Rock the Red
Twitter: @IRockTheRed
E-mail: irockthered {at} gmail {dot} com




































