Capitals Regular Season Best (and Worst) of Sevens
The Washington Capitals have had a pretty darn good regular season so far. With a second-consecutive 50-win campaign already under their belt and a President's Trophy in their sights, all eyes are on the playoffs.
And while the differences between regular season and playoff hockey are too many to mention, it doesn't stop the armchair pundits and big bucks bloviators from trying to use the first 82 games as a predictive tool of what will come next. With that in mind, here are a couple of notes on the season's 71 rolling seven-game stretches (chosen for obvious reasons) so far:
- Throw out games decided (won or lost) by shootouts and the Caps have won all seven games in a seven-game span seven times, six games another seven times, five games 18 times and four games 25 times. They've lost four-of-seven just four times (once at the end of March), and in each of those, they've had three wins. Add it up and that's 57-4 in regular season "best-of-sevens."
- In 25 seven-game spans, they've averaged four or more goals per game. In another 40, they've been at three or more. They've been below three just six times, bottoming out at 2.43 (which is more goals per game than the Bruins are averaging no the season).
- On the flip side of that coin, they've given up three or more goals over 25 seven-game sets, topping out at 3.86, but have been below three 46 times.
- Pulling those last two bullets together a bit, they've outscored their opponents over 67 seven-game spans and have been outscored three times (and by just .14 goals per game each time). For the seven-game stretch ending January 27, they'd outscored their opponents by 3.14 goals per game.
- The Caps' power play has converted better than 30% of its chances over a seven-game span 22 times (including a monstrous 50% span and four 40%+ stretches) and they've been above their League-best 25.6% mark for the season 35 times. Fourteen times they've been below 20%, including an 11.1% drought back in October.
- You know what's next: the penalty kill. On the plus side, 22 times they've gone seven games at better than an 82% PK efficiency (which would be good enough to be in the top half of the League in the metric on the season). On the other hand, they've been at or below the League's worst PK on the season (Toronto's 73.9%) 17 times, and below 80.5% (which would have them in the bottom-third of the League) 44 times.
- Overall on special teams, the Caps have outscored their opponents on the power play over a seven-game span 44 times (14 times by more than three) and been outscored 21 times (never by more than three). What's interesting is that they've had more power play opportunities than opponents 35 times and been outchanced the same number of times.
- On an individual level, Alex Ovechkin's best seven-game span? Nine goals (twice) and 16 points (twice). His worst? Two goals (eight times, including his last seven games) and five points. Nicklas Backstrom's best (12 assists; 17 points) and worst (one and one), Alexander Semin's best (six goals, six times; 14 points) and worst (one goal, seven times; three points), and Mike Green's best (four goals, four times; 11 points, three times) and worst (no goals, eight times; three points, three times) also merit mention.
- Finally, the goalies. Jose Theodore has won all seven games in a seven-appearance stretch five times this season. He's won six games five times, five games eight times and four games a dozen times, and has only lost four games in a seven-game span once all season. Of course, he's been bailed out a few times along the way, as he has posted a goals against avearage above 2.75 seventeen times in his 38 seven-appearance stretches (but has had eight spans of 2.50 or less), but he has had 19 spans with a save percentage above .910 and just eleven below .900. As for Semyon Varlamov, he has won six-of-seven twice, five games eight times and four games four times, and has yet to lose four games in any seven-game regular season stretch... in his career. His GAAs have been all over the map, with nine of his 18 seven-game spans below 2.30 (all pre-injury, of course) and five above 2.95. It's a similar story with his save percentages, six times below .900 and ten times above .910.
Those are a lot of numbers that really don't mean all that much once everyone's record is reset to 0-0 in a little over a week. But if there's one thing to pull from the above, it's that when this Caps team does hit a skid, it's usually very short-lived... even when it feels like an eternity for us fans.
61 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, amazing number crunching here.
Outside of the PK numbers which I think we all expected would be less than great, this is generally very positive. Looks like the only thing that could sink the Caps are the PK and goaltending.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Of the two, I think it’s more likely to be the PK, to be honest. The Caps’ goaltending isn’t elite, but it’s been good enough when it has to be most of the time this season. We’ve got to stay out of the box, though, because the PK isn’t getting it done.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
An interesting way to look at the regular season. Ovechkin’s worst seven-game stretch is five points? Man, he can’t even slump properly.
The caveat is, of course, that no seven game stretch came all against the Devils or all against the Sharks.
Also, these numbers don’t strike me as readily available, so a hearty rec for some amazing legwork.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
The caveat is, of course, that no seven game stretch came all against the Devils or all against the Sharks.
Right. And some were road-heavy while others home-heavy, etc. And none involved games getting moved to accomodate Yanni.
And thanks to you and JDC – the grunt work on this one was a bit of a female dog.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
We appreciate it.
It’s funny how changing that dash to a comma would make it seem like I was slapping the keyboard away from your or something. haha
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Sacks, cats, kits and wives – how many were going to St. Ives?
Now helping to keep an eye on all things Gr8 at Alex Ovetjkin.
I’ll pile on the compliments for the unreal number crunching work as well.
We’re reminded of it every day but it’s truly unreal how good Backstrom and Ovechkin are. The team goal scoring stat and individual scoring stats were the most “WOW” for me.
I really think the team is in good shape to get their playoff faces on the next few games and steam roll the first round. I’d like BB preaching for them to sweep the first round. Just step on some necks and don’t let up.
I look to the future because that's where I'm going to spend the rest of my life.
if I’m BB, no more than five games is my goal for the first round. Certainly no more seven-game slogs. Of course, I bet BB would appreciate having a better idea of who he might face in the first round. Right now, everybody knows who the first seed will be, but the eighth seed could be any one of four or five teams.
The Habs face the Flyers tonight, so that’ll give us more idea.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
my bank account would greatly thank the Caps for not dragging these things out to 7 games
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
To throw some love Theo's way...
Of course, he’s been bailed out a few times along the way, as he has posted a goals against average above 2.75 seventeen times in his 38 seven-appearance stretches
In the high risk/high reward system the Caps play, Theo and Varly are routinely hung out to dry by pinching D and offense-minded/defensively-challenged forwards. I feel like their GAA is always going to be higher than most. To state the obvious, our wins come from outscoring the opponents, not by shutting them down.
So, is there a stat we can cook up that shows how often an offense-first team leaves their goalie on the hook.? Compares a goalie’s GAA against a team’s GpG? Would such a stat be meaningful? Or would something using goal differential be more accurate?
~ p.s. Of course, love for the Rink: awesome article. First stop for anything worth reading about hockey.
Penalties Question
The one question I have is:
Is this team drawing more penalties than taking?
Also want to know the comparison from last years penalties drawn to taken ratios just to see comparison purposes.
(Sorry, I can’t check the penalty tracker b/c it’s blocked at work)
I work with 7 penguins fans and this is really getting old....
for fun, Washington has committed:
minors: 323 (14th)
majors: 24 (27th)
misc: 6 (11th)
game misconducts: 5 (tied for 1st)
they’ve had 297 PP opportunities, vs. being shorthanded 301 times (I pulled all this from NHL.com). Pretty even.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
I would expect a team that depends on speed and puck possession, and is as successful as the Caps, to draw more penalties than they take, though.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
It’s a consipracy! tinfoil hat time
Agreed, that number needs to be better in the post-season-big time.
"Why don't you smegging well smeg off, you annoying little smeggy smegging smegger!"
Should we use a Fanshot or FanPost to talk about magic numbers, playoff matchups, and so forth? it’s a recurring topic that we’re commenting on on a daily basis, and it’d be fun to keep track of the daily changes without cluttering up the Clips thread.
Of course, maybe that’s segmenting things too much. What do you guys think?
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
To be honest, I think people are going to talk about the standings in each day’s Clips post and probably wouldn’t visit an updated FanPost nearly as much, so you’d end up with a lot of duplication. Just my thought, though – if you want to, go for it.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’m happy to continue the daily playoff match-up posting “duties” (I start figuring playoff match-ups in November, I love this stuff, it’s hardly going out of my way to pull the info) in Clips if that’s what everyone would like.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
And I’m so glad you (and so many others) like to do that. I don’t have the patience.
Now helping to keep an eye on all things Gr8 at Alex Ovetjkin.
No, I’m more than happy to have you doing it and thank you. I got bored this morning, but I certainly appreciate it for the busier mornings. Literally the only reason I ask is to see if folks would prefer to have it in one place. since the answer appears to be no, I’m totally chill with that – all I’m doing is floating the balloon out there.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
it helps my find my zen in the morning, before I dive into another hellish day of work. (like today……oh. my. god.)
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
Not to be nit-picky but Varly did lose 4 of 7 against the Pens in the playoffs last year.
Jimmy steps in to lead off the bottom half of the inning... with nobody on base... It could happen... just not tonight.
That statement of fact about the 08/09 playoffs is very relevant to this discussion of the 09/10 regular season.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
true
but the story does say “in his career” about Varly. which is why I had the same thought about it as Hollywood.
Smart-assy statement retracted, then.
Did Theo get pegged with one of the losses or something, though?
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
I checked before I posted and Varly got the loss in game 7—which was the only one Theo played in.
Jimmy steps in to lead off the bottom half of the inning... with nobody on base... It could happen... just not tonight.
Maybe JP was just talking about his regular season career, then. Apologies for being a jerk.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Good call. I’ll go back in and qualify the line.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Holy Crap
I shudder just thinking about how much effort went into this. Bravissimo.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
Your tax dollars at work Thanks
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
This is a great post with some really cool perspective and analysis – thanks so much!
by markbona-capsfan99 on Apr 2, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions
The PK
Dohboy’s total freak out meltdown rational analysis of the PK in the roundtable is worth re-reading. I will further his assessment by saying this: In the last decade, only one NHL team has captured Lord Stanley’s mug without a penalty-killing unit ranked among the league’s top 10. Gah.
That said, we have this to fall back on: Washington is going to be the top seed overall with home ice advantage in every series, very tough to beat, with only 8 losses at home on the year and only 4 of those losses have come in regulation. And our PK is much better on home ice.
In the last decade, only one NHL team has captured Lord Stanley’s mug without a penalty-killing unit ranked among the league’s top 10. Gah.
So you’re saying there’s a chance!
And the other nine (well, all ten for that matter) didn’t have Alex Ovechkin. So eff ’em.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 2, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 7 recs
I like this attitude
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
For anyone who missed my freak out meltdown.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
we all have those days. I had one here at work not 30 minutes ago.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS! Ain’t nothing [wrong] about giving $5 so a stranger’s premature baby can have the time on a respirator they need.~Gould Old Days
I don’t think this was as much a freak out, as it was my budding frustration with a team that I think is going to let its lack of focus upend a potentially historic season. J.P.’s work in the post above is amazing and difficult to argue against. However, I still get the feeling that this is a team that will find a way to make a 5-game series go 7 games, and will then have a major let-down against an “inferior” opponent who is simply willing to work harder and pay attention to detail.
One of the things I love about BB’s system is that it’s aggressive – it puts pressure on the other team. The downside is, if not everyone buys in, things can get ugly fast (see last night’s goal-against, or Campoli’s goal against the Sens). Jpbryant makes this point below – I fear what could happen to this team if a few calls don’t go their way.
While I agree with J.P.‘s point that we’ve got Ovie and more talent than any prospective opponent (perhaps save Chicago), I worry about this team’s ability to focus for 60 minutes over the course of several seven-game series.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
Not for nothing, but when Jay Leach was canned left last summer, I was hoping/praying (maybe even commenting) that they would bring in a veteran coach with PK expertise. Needless to say, it didn’t happen.
If the PK is ultimately this team’s downfall this spring, I think the most obvious fix would be replacing Evason with someone who can do a better job there.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Hershey PK
For what it’s worth (perhaps not much), here’s Hershey’s PK % and rank over the last few years:
Year. . .Rank. . .% . . . Result
05-06. . . 2. . . 85.4 (All BB – Calder Cup)
06-07. . . 5. . . 85.6 (All BB – Calder Cup Runners Up)
07-08. . .22. . .80.6 (1/2 BB, 1/2 Bob Woods – 1st Round Loss in Playoffs)
08-09. . .29. . .78.6 (All Bob Woods – Calder Cup)
09-10. . . 1 . . .87.9 (All Mark French – ???)
For all those who were in the “Bob Woods will transform this defense” camp, it appears as though you were right. He does transform defenses – he makes them suck with a tight seal.
Personally, I think if the Caps flame out in this post-season and the PK is a major culprit, we ought to see a shake-up in the coaching staff. I’d give Boudreau another season, but I wouldn’t be sad to see Evason and/or Woods move on.
And yes, I do understand that there is not a perfect correlation between AHL and NHL results, this is merely to show that BB was/is capable of coaching a good penalty kill and that not all of our coaches can say the same thing.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
I don’t think that’s fair at all. After all, Dean Evason – and not Bob Woods – is “the primary architect of the penalty kill.”
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Funny you mention it. . .
I was thinking of doing this up as a FanPost, but here’s some data on Evason-coached teams over the years:
Kamloops Blazers
Year. . . Rank/Total. . . . %
99-00. . . 7/18. . . 82.5
00-01. . . 11/18… 79.2
01-02. . . 7/19 . . .81.9
Vancouver Giants
Year. . . Rank/Total. . . . %
02-03. . . 11/19. . .81.6
03-04. . . 3/20 . . . 87.5
Calgary Hitmen (co-coach)
Year. . . Rank/Total. . . . %
04-05. . . 11/20. . . 84.0
Not a whole lot to draw from this, other than that he’s always had mediocre penalty kills. Personally, I’ve always found the PK to be something that coaches have a great deal of control over. Sure, having a great goaltender helps, but having a good system and guys who follow it is more important.
I was including the Bob Woods numbers in the previous post in order to reference the fact that it’s not all Boudreau’s fault – the team actually had a pretty good penalty kill when he was the head coach down in Hershey. If the data had shown that BB’s teams always sucked at the PK, you could make the argument that not enough time/effort is spent on the PK versus the power play or 5v5 systems play under BB. That doesn’t seem to be the case.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
Gotcha – I thought you were blaming the PK woes on Woods, when I think Evason is far more culpable there. But ultimately, if Bruce has turned the PK over to Evason entirely and this is the result, it’s on Bruce to fix it.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
While that Stanley Cup Last 10 stat is disturbing, I feel like it must be taken with a grain of salt. I’d be interested to see how the PKs of the last 10 President’s Trophy winners ranked in the league.
Long day of thesis writing, so I’m not very eloquent at the moment. But what I’m trying to say is that stat could instead be reflecting the fact that normally the teams with abysmal PKs are just not very good teams overall. It’s not that teams with bad PKs won’t win the Stanley Cup, it’s that teams who aren’t capable of winning the Stanley Cup probably are also not capable of effectively killing very many penalties.
Does that makes sense?
Every time the Swedish Swashbuckler scores a goal, an angel gets its wings.
by SeattleCapsFan on Apr 2, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions
When the caps first clinched I spent about 10 minutes trying to see how many times the caps had lost 4 out of 7 games during the season. This incredible level of detail is a friday afternoon gold mine for those of us fascinated by the numbers. Thank you for the effort.
Reading the stats on the penalty kill I can’t help thinking about the third factor going into these playoffs. Teams built differently then the caps, and with different strengths, might have an easier time overcoming uneven refereeing then this team will. Because the Caps are so weak on the PK, the random variable that is playoff reffing may have more impact on the Caps then on any other serious contender. A couple of bad calls have the potential to be disastrous for this team, especially against a closely matched opponent.
This is my biggest fear going into the playoffs. No tin foil hat here, just the reality that human error committed by a third party could derail this amazing year.
by jpbryant on Apr 2, 2010 2:52 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You do know that you’ve got the same avatar as sydtron, right? It’s wicked confusing.
There's a fine line between arrogance and ignorance and only I manage to erase that line.
Perspective!!
Me likey. Obviously facing the same team over seven games is a different animal, but I applaud the innovative angle taken here. The info on the droughts and gluts the high end guys have gone through was particularly enlightening.
Rec’d for innovation and hard work.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Work has gone crazy over here, so I haven’t had the chance to reprise this fanpost. I guess I don’t need to now. Wow, JP, you sure took that style of analysis to an entirely different plane.
It’s fun to look again at those numbers from last year, when the Caps had lost 4 of 7 nineteen times. The most consistent regular season team last year — the Wings — had lost 4 of 7 six times by March 31. This year, the Caps have done it only four times.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
Mind-blowingly awesome number crunching. It makes me feel a lot better about the Caps’ playoff chances, I must say. I can’t rec this hard enough!
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Apr 2, 2010 4:45 PM EDT reply actions
Um, wow is all I can say.
Every time the Swedish Swashbuckler scores a goal, an angel gets its wings.
Well, that and the other stuff you posted.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
by jordanDC on Apr 2, 2010 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs




































