Are the Caps Caught in a Trap?
Back in November, the Caps dropped a 3-2 game to the Canadiens. It wasn't a particularly "bad" loss, somewhat indistinguishable from the other 15 times the Presidents' Trophy winner lost in regulation in 2009-10 (though rare in that it was one of the five on home ice), but in retrospect, it was certainly foreshadowing what we saw last night. In recapping that game, I wrote the following:
The Caps are a phenomenally skilled hockey club (even without perhaps their most skilled player, Alexander Semin), and when Bruce Boudreau turns his boys loose, they’re an absolute joy to watch… on most nights. Trouble is, there are certain teams and styles against which run-and-gun just won’t necessarily work. Who are these teams? Well, chances are, if a team has a guy named Jacques behind the bench, they’re one of these teams.And Montreal’s got a guy named Jacques behind the bench.
The Caps were stifled in the neutral zone and in the middle of the ice all night, they didn’t adjust, and they didn’t win. Their two goals were both the result of hard work in the offensive zone – not mad dashes up ice – but in the end, it was too little of that and too much trying to take what just wasn’t there.
Take that with what we already knew about Montreal's ability to frustrate Alex Ovechkin on the goal-scoring front, the Caps' struggles on the penalty kill (which, in fairness, came up huge a couple of times) and the ever-present potential to run into a hot goalie in spring time and nothing that happened last night should have been all that surprising to anyone.
So now time for the former Jack Adams Trophy winner (Boudreau, not the Canadiens' Jacques Martin, who won the award as the League's best bench boss late last century) to coach 'em up. People can bemoan Alex Ovechkin's performance all they want to, but when he's the one carrying the puck through the neutral zone and turning it over upon entry into the Montreal end of the ice (if he even gets that far) rather than making better use of his teammates, there's a flaw in the orders his boss is giving (or not giving) him. When neither of the scoring lines can sustain any puck possession in the offensive zone, there's a problem with the game plan... or at least how those charges are executing them.
Point being, adjustments need to be made. (For much more on what those adjustments - and they're tweaks, more than overhauls - might look like, here's a good read). To think otherwise is to ignore a good bit of evidence, from last night and prior, as to the effectiveness of Gabby's system against neutral-zone-clogging squads. For example, Boudreau is now 8-5-4 in his NHL coaching career against Les Trapping Jacques Fabuleux (Lemaire, late of Minnesota and now behind the bench in Jersey being the other), with his team scoring a full 16.7% fewer goals per game against the current purveyors of what most closely resembles the traditional "neutral zone trap" than they have against the rest of the League.
One needs look no further than last night's game to get a sense of the difference a little good ol' fashioned dump and chase could make. Without question, the bottom two lines were the most effective last night in terms of puck possession, and that's no coincidence - those six forwards were willing to dump the puck in and fight for it in the corners and along the boards. The top two lines could learn a lot from the grinders in that respect, and it's not like those two lines can't play that game: both trios have the requisite size and the grit to get it done.
None of this is to say that the Caps can't stay the course and win this series - one has to like the Caps' chances of winning if they're putting 40-plus shots on game every night (though more shots from higher-traffic arease would increase those chances dramatically). And it's certainly not to say that the Caps' "style of play" can't win in the playoffs - this is much more about match-ups than time of year.
But if the Caps' skill forwards are unwilling to do what it takes to beat a team that plays the way Montreal does, the series could at the very least be a lot longer than anyone expected and at the very worst... well, we won't go there. The ball's in your court, Gabby. I recommend dumping it in and going to retrieve it rather than trying to push through the wall in front of you.
227 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
People can bemoan Alex Ovechkin’s performance all they want to, but when he’s the one carrying the puck through the neutral zone and turning it over upon entry into the Montreal end of the ice (if he even gets that far) rather than making better use of his teammates, there’s a flaw in the orders his boss is giving (or not giving) him.
Well, couldn’t Alex just be ignoring him? It’s been brought up a bunch of times including when I spoke to Bruce at the draft [name dropper >:( ] but Ovechkin takes long shifts because he just doesn’t listen.
I think Bruce is a really good coach so as upset as I was at the loss I think the Caps will adjust and proceed to do what we expect.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
selfishly, always good to hear someone from “outside” compliment Bruce’s coaching. I know he’s good oodles of talented players on the ice and its sometimes easy (or lazy) to overlook his coaching skills and say “I wonder how’d he do if he was coaching, say, Edmonton.”. And then there’s the fact that Bruce comes off as one of the goofiest but most genuine people in the world and we here in DC get to see that all the time, sometimes I wonder if that makes us a little more hesitant to criticize him.
I too expect (and hope) that Bruce will adjust accordingly and the rest of this series will go as expected.
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS, PLAYOFF EDITION!
For those who have young children
Bruce looks like Sir Toppem Hat.
No Ovechkin couldn’t be ignoring them and still be getting 20:00+ of ice time.
by markbona-capsfan99 on Apr 17, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Awesome post deserving a rec in itself, but particularly for those last two sentences.
This series is by no means over, and I don’t mean to sound like I’m panicking, but BB has really soured on me a bit this season. I’ve questioned his personnel management and ability (or lack thereof) to make adjustments in the face of obvious difficulties way too much for my liking this year.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
I think Bruce has been a great coach for the Caps. He’s developed our players, generated solid team chemistry, implemented the right system, managed personnel well, won a lot of games, etc. But, like you, I feel he has not demonstrated is the ability play the match-up game. And that’s likely because he hasn’t really needed to….we usually completely out-class teams on a nightly basis, and when we don’t I still like our odds to win. The problem is that if Bruce wants to take this team deep he has to start matching up better, or else we’ll constantly wear ourselves out during these 7-game dogfights. I thought he did a poor job matching lines last year against Pittsburgh – who dominated puck possession in that series.
I’m not going to throw BB under the bus after one game against Montreal – and I acknowledge that our guys can probably play the same game they just played and still win this series. But I don’t want this to drag out to 7 games and then have to go into a series against PHI or PIT. If BB makes appropriate adjustments we can finish this off in 6 and get some rest.
0 down. 16 to go.
Bruce’s argument against line matching is that you want your best players on the ice. If you’re focused on matching Defensive specialists against another team’s top line that skates 20 minutes a game, you’re diminishing the amount of time your own top line gets.
That being said, I think there are certainly times when Bruce could pay more attention to personnel
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Apr 16, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Which is why most NHL coaches now go power vs. power, top line vs. top line, and focus more on getting the best defensive defencemen out against the top line.
Considering Montreal’s top line, Ovechkin should own that matchup. Hamrlik and Spacek in particular were very solid last night, though.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
I don’t even really care about the line matching. I think there is a lot of credence to the concept of building a team with 4 lines that can be effective no matter who they are against, and I think the Caps have done that.
When it comes to personnel management I am more critical of ice time management during the season, how he’s handled the defensemen at times, and his use (or lack of use) of certain players on the PK.
Don’t get me wrong, BB has done a fantastic job getting this team to where it is. But now he has to prove, just like the rest of the team, that he can take the next stepl
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 16, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Bruce can play the line-matching game without cutting into Ovi/Nikki’s minutes, especially at home. For example, don’t play Ovi against Gill 5-on-5. Or make sure that every time Gill is out there is a speedy winger who’s going to thump him (Chimera, and to a lesser extent Bradley). I’m not going to pretend to know enough about Montreal’s personnel to judge what exactly they should do but there are tweaks BB can make that will make the game more difficult for the Habs.
0 down. 16 to go.
He had AO against Bergeron a lot. That’s a great match up for the Caps. But we play like cute little [Potis] and try the home run passes and all that bullshit. Honestly, it doesn’t matter who we are out against. MON plays their system as a team and any one of those lines can shut down AO’s line if they don’t decide to sack up and do what needs to be done.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
I was perplexed a few times last night. Particularly when, for a faceoff, all of our personnel were in place while Montreal were skating back and forth from the bench as if line changing to match ours. Knowing that the home team has last line change priveleges, why did the Caps not wait until Montreal had their line set before we sent out our package? The only thing I can think of is that BB wanted a crew out there regardless of who Montreal sent out to match (I remember two faceoffs in there zone where we prolly wanted our top sniper unit out there where this occurred). Sort of like trading pawns in chess. It’s a given in certain situations. It may be a formality in some cases, but I’d like to see BB wait for Montreal to get their guys out there first IMHO.
"More Gary Thorne, please."
Nah…it happened during faceoffs in the MON zone so that can’t be icing (on WAS).
"More Gary Thorne, please."
I think I settled for the happy hour beer, whatever that was, but the bar was pretty awesome. There was an MMA weigh-in going on, which was strange, but I wound up sitting at the bar with this guy that played (albeit about as much Leonhardt played for the Caps) for my hometown team, the Richmond Renegades, and Joe Sakic and his wife were there watching their son play. Thanks again for the tip!
after the other team has iced the puck and cant change their personnel for another example. that’s not letting the other team dictate your lineup, that just taking advantage of a mismatch.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Apr 16, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Well Said
Jacques coached one hell of a game last night and deserves as much credit as Halak for the Habs win. Jacques 1, Bruce 0. BB needs to step up now.
0 down. 16 to go.
After two games last spring, everyone was talking about how badly Torts outcoached Bruce. That tune had changed before the series was over. Hopefully this one goes similarly.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I think Torts got more out of his guys in that series that BB did. The Rangers won 2 more games than they should have. Had Torts not melted down in Game 5 and gotten himself thrown out of Game 6 he would have easily won the coaching matchup.
0 down. 16 to go.
Nice analysis, JP, and not to be snarky, but I’m guessing that if you can see that adjustments need to be made, Bruce will too. I don’t think they need to get away from what made them the best team in the league, but if Montreal is stacking up the neutral zone then dump-ins will have to occur more often. What I like most about a dump and chase approach is that it requires Montreal to get their noses dirty and it pits the Caps bigger forwards against their smaller defenseman. That’s a war Montreal can’t possibly win. One more thing. The Caps need to go to the net more often and create traffic in front of Halak. And the occasional jostle or bump would be nice too. That’s what they did to Lundquist last year and we saw the results.
by b.orr4 on Apr 16, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I’m guessing that if you can see that adjustments need to be made, Bruce will too
I’m not so sure that Bruce would see that adjustments “need” to be made. He has more hockey smarts in his remaining hair follicles than I have in my entire body and might have seen plenty that he really liked last night. I just had a couple thoughts I figured I’d share with the group.
And I totally, fully agree with everything else you said.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’m with you on this. The adjustments are easy. Beating the trap is not a secret, it just sucks. Skilled teams don’t want to play dump and chase but that’s what you have to do.
I think it’s more likely that BB thinks they don’t actually need to make adjustments because they just need to play a little better.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
And get the lead. We saw last night, that when Montreal fell behind in the third, instantly the ice opened up and it was end to end rushes. That’s why the first goal on Saturday is so important. If the Caps get a lead and maybe extend it to 2 or 3 goals, the trap will disappear.
Getting an early lead is a big part of the trap, for sure. And yeah, it was more open when we got the lead. Problem is we let them have as many chances as we got. A certain player put less effort into his backcheck than I put into my school work yesterday, and let Scott Fucking Doosh Bag Gomez score a goal against us. Trap or no trap, we play like that and we lose.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Yeah, that was inexcusable on Ovechkin’s part. You get a lead with 13 minutes to go, you need to hold it.
I thought Gomez was Green's guy on the goal?
Or was that a late pickup that 52 had to make b/c Ovie stopped skating?
Ovie tried to line up Scotty for an open-ice hit in the neutral zone rather than try to backcheck. Gomez, who is pretty shifty ;), outright dodged him, and barely slowed down. He hit the blueline at speed drop passed, and went to the net — where Green picked him up too slow, and he had a step on the Cap when Gionta’s pass found him.
It seemed like the CAPS were dumping and chasing most of the first period…then got away from it when things got tight and OVI continued to struggle. They came out hit everything that moved in that first period, causing turnovers and wreaking havoc. I thought it was ne of the best periods they played all year. Without the power plays, Montreal might have had 2 shots in the first.
Im confident that the CAPS can play dump and chaset, and if they keep it up, it will make the trap muhc harder to sustain for Montreal.
by Direction 87 on Apr 16, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
we need that bearded dude to throw beer on jacques and get him suspended.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Apr 16, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Why should we assume Bruce is going to change his system now? He had a full 3 days of prep time for Montreal and he did nothing. The Caps continued to try and go 1 on 3 all night expecting their skill and size to win out. This is not a dump and chase team. This is the system they run and it’s the system they are going to try and win a Cup with.
I’d hate to compare this to the Coach K teams at Duke since 2001. He fell in love with his system of penetrating and launching more three pointers than his opponents and never adjusted until this year when he added more big men/slashers who could finish at the rim. With a more balanced attack they didn’t have to live by the three and die by the three, but he still had enough skill players to shoot the 3’s when they needed to.
Duke won a lot of regular season games from 2002-2009, but it took a system tweak to win it all.
Karl Alzner + John Carlson = Carl Carlson!
I comparing coaches who have great systems for a regular season, that might not necessarily work for their respective playoffs/tournaments.
Karl Alzner + John Carlson = Carl Carlson!
I really don’t think this has anything to do with playoffs vs. non-playoffs – there’s every reason to believe that the Caps would be doing well against teams they did well against during the regular season, just as they’re having trouble (through one game) with a team that gave them some trouble during the regular season.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
The whole playoffs v non playoffs is the teams you play against and how they prepare for you. In the regular season you have a lot of games against inferior opponents along with good opponents. Also in the regular season teams have 1-2 days max to prepare a game plan. In the playoffs you have one singular focus for 1-2 weeks against one opponent and how to shut them down.
Karl Alzner + John Carlson = Carl Carlson!
Montreal did to the Caps last night precisely what they did to them four times before during the season, so I have a hard time seeing how this is playoffs-specific.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Laichitor made a good point at the bar last night. In the regular season you lose to one trapping team and then the next night you play someone that doesn’t trap and you win. That makes BB think maybe the trap loss was a fluke. Playing a trap team (potentially) 7 times in a row really makes you confront your problems a lot more. BB hasn’t had to do it. Maybe he will now. (Or maybe it’s the team and their lack of ability to dial it up until the blade is on their throat.)
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Then going forward, does it hurt the Caps to, say, be playing this trap team then have to transition to play, say, PIT, if the Caps win?
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 17, 2010 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions
perspective, thank you!
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS, PLAYOFF EDITION!
Not talking changing systems, just a bit more willingness from top guys to dump and chase.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Wouldn’t switching to dump and chase rather than skating with the puck through the neutral zone be a system change?
Karl Alzner + John Carlson = Carl Carlson!
No, not really – the third and fourth lines are already doing it.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
But they did that all year long. That’s their role. The superstars who have the overall talent to carry the puck in never have to play dump and chase.
Karl Alzner + John Carlson = Carl Carlson!
Not, apparently, against Montreal
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Not true, they did plenty when they wanted to.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
any regular season games come to mind where the top two lines effectively executed a deliberate dump n chase strategy? (Not a snark, I don’t know and am just asking)
I think people are getting caught up in thinking that dumping and chasing is a huge tactical change from what’s currently done. Really, it’s just the recognition of what the other team is giving you as you transition from defense to offense and reacting – if they’re stacking up, throw it cross-corner so your teammates coming with speed can blow past (or blow up) the D; if they’re backing in, carry it and do your thing. In that respect, it’s more on the players than the coach, but it’s on the coach to recognize and get his players in the proper mindset.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
And I suppose the hope is that eventually their D will back in a little and that’ll open up the skill game as well.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 17, 2010 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree with what you wrote, but is there a psychological aspect to letting the 8th seed dictate the style of play to the #1 seed? Will it take 2 losses for the boys to adjust their approach?
Because now I can justify browsing and commenting during the work day with the argument that I am promoting my business.
by Sombrero Guy on Apr 16, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
There’s also a pyschological aspect to seeing the guy behind your bench not being able to adjust to what the other guy is doing.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Not necessarily. But there’s more to adjusting than switching up the lines, and it’s Bruce’s time to show he can make the necessary changes.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I think Bruce has shown on numerous occasions that he can make changes and I’m pretty sure he’ll do so for Saturday’s game. You don’t accumulate the number of wins he has in every league he’s coached by not being able to adapt to the opposition. Again, this is just one game where they lost in OT after putting up 47 shots on goal and their superstar did nothing. It’s not like they were Pittsburgh where they only managed 21 shots and gave up five goals to the other team’s third and fourth liners. Last night, Montreal’s stars beat Washington stars. I’m betting that’s not going to happen a lot as the series progresses.
It’s not like they were Pittsburgh where they have ever shown the ability to dominate a playoff series, or even a modicum of killer instinct.
Pens fans have much less to be concerned about than Caps fans.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Really? Are you basing that on their success last year?
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m basing that on the fact that PIT has faced inferior teams in the playoffs and wiped the ice with them. They’ve swept teams, won in 5, whatever. When they smell blood, they’ve taken it. When have the Caps ever done that? Go back to 1935 if you have to.
Knowing that you have the same core and you’ve won a Cup with it obviously doesn’t hurt, but that’s not my main point. It’s more about your mentality. The Caps haven’t shown that mentality yet.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Ottawa also will be without Kuba, Michalek and Kovalev. And Brian Elliott was terrible in game 1.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Because Fleury was even worse. I don’t bank on that happening enough to tip the balance in Ottawa’s favor.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Probably right, but you have to admit this year’s Fleury has been significantly worse than the Fleury of 2008-09. A lot of it probably has to do with Scuderi and Gill being gone. That is one soft defense they have in Pittsburgh.
It is, but Ottawa doesn’t have the firepower to exploit that over a long-term series, which it most assuredly will be. They’ll move on just fine.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think Fleury has been significantly worse last year. Even last year he was an inconsistent goalie that put up average stats. He had a bad game the other night, but I’d be surprised if that continues for the whole series.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 16, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly. I don’t buy the “oh Fleury turns it on in the playoffs” crap. I however do buy that he’s gotten hot at the right times in the last couple years. Perhaps it’s just my blind hate for Pittsburgh, but I just can’t seem to give MAF any respect at all.
"If you want money go to the bank, if you want bread go to the bakery if you want goals go to the net." - #21
by snakegriffin on Apr 16, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
He doesn’t do anything to really “cost” them games cosistently. He’s never going to be a superstar, but he’s just solid enough with what they have in front of him.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think Fleury has been significantly worse last year.
Statistically, this year is slightly worse than last year. The difference though is how he finished. In his last 21 games in ‘08-’09, he finished on a 14-4-3 run with a .935 save% and 2.09 GAA. This year he finished 9-5-5 and was pulled from two other games. His save% was .900 and his GAA was 2.70. And then he started off the playoffs with a horrible clunker.
Yeah, he finished worse. But again, he’s always been inconsistent so I don’t put a ton of stock in it. Even if he is just average against OTT the Pens should win. He doesn’t have to go stealing games, just not shit all over himself for an entire series.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 16, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Okay, just didn’t know where you were coming from. Makes sense. Until you lose the whole series I’m not too willing to get all worked up, even if I were a Caps fan.
Also, if you happened to lose this series, BB’s coaching would need a serious evaluation, no?
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
If we lose this series BB needs a serious evaluation. He’ll be back regardless so it’s not worth talking about the possibility that he’s not.
And winning or losing the series isn’t the whole point. We beat the Rags but spent much more energy than we should have had to. You need to show that ability to just bring it and stomp a team. The Caps don’t have that.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
by Rob Parker on Apr 16, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Everyone needs to take a breath. Seriously. It’s one game and already we’re talking about firing the coach. Now I know what’s it’s like to be a Redskins fan.
I will too, as soon as we get our own sycophantic show on CSN starring Larry Michael, and we get exclusive footage of our newest acquisitions in uniforms.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Its more of a general loathing of the NFL, its media monopoly, its ham handed business and ethical tactics and the journalists that slobber all over it than just the Redskins, but that’s OT.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn’t say anything about firing him. Maybe we should know what it’s like to be a Cubs fan and just ignore repeated failure.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
As a Red Sox fan we were quite comfortable ignoring repeated failure and then they hired Terry Francona and everything changed. He and Boudreau have a lot of similarities that extend beyond their hairlines. They’re both player’s coaches, they don’t overreact to individual losses or overcoach and they let their stars be stars. Like I’ve said before, Bruce is a proven winner who’s taken a team that was in the ashes and turned them into the best team in the league in a little over two years. He’s earned my trust. You guys want to go postal on him after one loss, be my guest.
I don’t see anything postal, and these concerns were raised before this loss. And if Caps fans have to go through what Red Sox fans had to go through I may as well shoot myself in the face right now.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
I will call shenanigans on this “sox fan.” Francona is a helluva intangibles coach. He understands players and manages personalities better than any coach I’ve seen for any period of time. However, he was a very small part of the franchise turnaround. It started from the top, with the Henry >Luccihno > Epstein. I’d give the lion’s share of the credit to Theo, but he’d never have been there if it weren’t for the big guys in charge.
Back to the Caps, BB has a couple glaring flaws, and would probably not crack my top 10 coaches in the league if I had my choice, but that doesn’t mean he’s not a good coach, or great for this team. This postseason, and in reality, this series will go along way in evaluating really how good of an Xs and Os coach BB is, because clearly he’s getting out worked behind the bench.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Apr 16, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
One thing I see the real elite coaches (IMO) is making changes “on the fly.” Bylsma and Babcock are great at doing this in-game, for two. BB seems a little reluctant.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 17, 2010 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Are you extending the same logic to Detroit, San Jose, and maybe Chicago after the Preds are done with them tonight?
it’s Bruce’s time to show he can make the necessary changes.
For those wondering, there’s this from Tarik’s Twitter:
Asked if he would consider putting Semin on the top line, Boudreau said: “I’m going to consider a lot of things.”
I think that gets to what a lot of us have said: Boudreau’s go to when things aren’t working is to shuffle the lines. If that doesn’t work, he shuffles the lines. Then, as a last resort, he shuffles the lines. The approach doesn’t seem to change much.
by David Getz on Apr 16, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I don’t think you’re giving him enough credit. Sometimes he dresses a guy he scratched in the previous game and scratches a guy he dressed.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
well, at least Ovechwin would be happy
Kung-fu Rink Rabbit
Donate to the Rink Pledge Drive for SAVES FOR KIDS, PLAYOFF EDITION!
But maybe having Laich and Knuble on a line will work because those guys will actually get the puck deep and chase. Then we’ll only have one floating line that refuses to play simple hockey. Problem Flash is going to hold that 2C and he won’t do anything on a D&C line.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Boudreau’s go to when things aren’t working is to shuffle the lines.
But that’s not what he’s saying. The question was “Are you going to put Semin on the top line” and his response was not to say “I’m going to shuffle lines” but " I’m goping to consider a lot of things." That could mean inserting BMO and Walker, it could mean more dump and chase. It could mean a lot of things other than switching lines.
It could also mean “I don’t know what the hell is wrong, but if I say I’m thinking about it, that sounds good.” I don’t think that’s what it means, but “I’ll consider a lot of things” isn’t exactly the missing chapter from “Profiles in Courage.” Nor would I expect Bruce to tip his hand, of course.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 16, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Burce Won't Telegraph a Thing
You last sentence is almost certainly the most accurate.
Nor would I expect Bruce to tip his hand, of course.
Any of us can follow the standard script:
1. “We’re going to do what it takes to win, and if that means changing some things, we’re going to do that.”
2. “The boys know they need to play better and we’re going to focus on those things that we know we do well.”
3. “This is a long series that isn’t going to be one or lost in one game. We have to believe if we play our game that things will go well.”
4. “We have a system to follow and, if we follow that system, we should see a good result.”
5. “We don’t repeat things that don’t work. We constantly make adjustments, but we don’t panic. No one here is panicking.”
Now I’m out of breath.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
Literaly LOL
I don’t think that’s what it means, but "I’ll consider a lot of things" isn’t exactly the missing chapter from "Profiles in Courage."
Unfortunately, no Fed to swap up to the top line, pushing Backstrom down with Semin. I don’t think Flash/BMo can go 1C.
Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
Capitals Coming: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
by red army line on Apr 17, 2010 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s an ebb and flow. The Caps were stifled by the trap. So – in response — they could start dumping a chasing as a team. There is no reason that 22-19-8 can’t dump and chase with the best of them. Witness Nick in the corner last night.
If the Caps do this successfully and the D for Montreal get caught and passed in the neutral zone, then the D should react and back off a bit. Then — OV and Nick become unencumbered through the neutral zone.
If the Caps had starting dumping and chasing (as one strategy) in the 2nd period last night, we could be talking about how the Habs failed to adjust to us.
And – I think that’s the question folks are posing here – can BB adjust and take what’s given him?
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
I can't take it
Not you Spidey, but just this sentiment that the Caps were stifled. They had a shitload of shots on goal, and not all were dump-in wristers from the forwards before a line change. They had plenty of opportunities to seize control of that game, and Nicky had the effing game on his stick on that 3 on 1 in OT.
My take? Yes, some more dump and chase from guys who aren’t accustomed to it would be nice. But I think the Caps were thinking schock and awe last night, especially in the first period, and expected the Habs to wither. They didn’t. But the Caps are undoubtedly stronger (how many times were the Habs’ Smurfs stripped of the puck by our bigger forwards? How many face-offs did they win in the d-zone?
I don’t see a lot of downside. Honestly. The Caps should have crushed them last night. They dominated for long stretches, and Bouds probably thought, “these fuckers can’t take this pounding all night”. Any analyst watrching that game knows how the Habs won, but is probably amazed the Caps lost. I think the Caps were getting mentally fatigued from doing a lot of good things and not being ahead 3-0 real quick.
by S h a g g y on Apr 16, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fair point. Writing “The Caps were stifled by the trap” is a great example of post-game-1 loss hysteria combined with a grande Starbucks and a 20 ounce diet Mountain Dew in rapid succession.
At the end of the day, I’m not sure that OV himself adjusted to Habs defense. He tried the same thing over and over and over again. I’ll take away the positives, but the lack of mid-game adjustment frustrates me.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
sentiment that the Caps were stifled. They had a shitload of shots on goal, and not all were dump-in wristers from the forwards before a line change.
Someone pull up the shot chart. Tons of those 47 were from low-traffic areas.
You might not like hearing it, but the Caps’ top two lines were absolutely stifled at 5-on-5. And that’s not hysteria.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
the Caps’ top two lines were absolutely stifled at 5-on-5.
The top two lines accounted for 13 out of the 37 even strength shots or roughly 35% of the total. It depends on what you consider stifled. Of course, that only accounts for five guys since a certain sixth guy didn’t get any.
I think it’s “stifled” in comparison to their normal shot production…especially that certain sixth guy. That we had 47 shots on goal without anything from Ovi is one of the things that keeps me from panicking.
Every time the Swedish Swashbuckler scores a goal, an angel gets its wings.
by SeattleCapsFan on Apr 16, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
So what you’re saying is that 50% of the Caps’ forwards – the 50% that are the skill guys, and who combined for 210 goals and 1,362 shots on goal in 443 man-games this season – contributed just over one-third of the ES shots on goal? Yeah, I’m fine with “stifled” here.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
While the Caps were certainly stifled, they had scored more even strength goals than Montreal — during regulation yesterday. But they ended up tied after regulation since Montreal converted ONE power play while the Caps converted 0. That’s right, Nada, zero, zippo.
Note the caveats: Even strength and regulation time.
The special teams is what basically killed us. Along with our absolutely abysmal track record in OT.
Rocking the Red since 1975
according to the shot chart....
….which I know has a tendency to be inaccurate, the top 2 lines actually got the highest amount of both shots total and shots from the “home plate” area:
Semin 1-6 (1 shot in home plate area out of 6)
backs 3-7
knoob 2-5
Flash (ugh) 1-1
Laich 2-2
Ovechkin 0-0
Total for top 2 lines: 9/21
Total for bottom 2 lines: 3/15
Total for D: 3/11 (all 3 credited to Carlson)
Obviously that includes a lot of PP SOGs, and the bottom 6 guys aren’t really out for that time. See b.orr4’s “13 of 37” number above.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Breaking it down a little further when compared to the shot averages during the ‘09-’10 season, here’s how it comes out.
Backstrom
Season Average (all shots-ES,PP,SH)-2.7
Game 1- ES-5, PP-1
Knuble
Season Average-2.1
Game 1- ES-3, PP-4
Laich
Season Average-2.8
Game 1- ES-1, PP-1
Flash
Season Average-1.7
Game 1- ES-1, PP-0
Semin
Season Average-3.8
Game 1- ES-3, PP-3
Ovechkin
Season Average-5.1
Game 1- ES-0, PP-0
What this tells me is that two-thirds of the first line was way above average even strength and that Laich and Flash were slightly below average and Semin was way above average. So, in answer to the original statement that the first two lines were stifled last night even strength, based on season averages, I don’t see it. The obvious exception is Ovechkin, who we all agree played like dog meat last night.
OK, so they were near or above their averages with the one obvious exception… so why were the bottom lines all that much more dominant? Because they dumped the puck and fetched it.
Bottom line to me is that the, um, bottom lines had no trouble generating chances. Top lines did. What was the difference? Willingness to take what was available.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Or maybe the Caps third and fourth lines are just that much better than Montreal third and fourth lines. And maybe they were playing against the weaker defensive pairings. Look, I don’t disagree that I’d like to see more dump and chase. In fact, I strongly agree with that idea. I just don’t think that the first two lines were all that bad-except for Ovechkin. Darren McCarty said something on VS that I think might be the key here. On all his winning Detroit teams, it was the 3rd and 4th liners who often made the difference. The Caps have tremendous depth and Montreal really doesn’t. If the Caps are to win this series, it may well rest on what the Bradleys and the Chimeras of this team do.
who combined for 210 goals and 1,362 shots on goal in 443 man-games this season
I would counter that a LOT of those 210 goals and 1362 shots on goal came on the PP, so they are perfectly valid to include in this statistical analysis. And to break it down further, 1362 SOG in 443 man-games this season would average out to about 3.07 shots per player, or 18.45 shots for 6 players. So they actually posted MORE shots (21) than average, despite 0 from AO, then they averaged on the season. Obviously, I don’t have any season stats on their “traffic area” shots during the season, but seems like 42.85% (9/21) of their shots coming from home plate is a pretty good rate. The only number that seems “off” from their normal production is just 1 goal and 1 assist.
The Caps never failed to score 3 goals at home this season, until last night. Hopefully that gets someone’s attention.
Also, hopefully the Caps can play with a lead for a bit longer – that will force the Habs to open it up a bit.
But some simple hockey from the top 2 lines would not go amiss, that’s for sure.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
Whatchoo talkin’ ‘bout willis? I just looked over the schedule and the Caps had six home games where they didn’t get at least three goals.
The stat is actually that the Caps have scored at least 2 goals in every home game this season.
by Moonage Daydream on Apr 16, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Great Tweets
@drosennhl Good point being talked about here that Ovi, a right-handed shot coming down the left wing, is up against Montreal’s six left-handed D-men. If Ovi tries to go to the middle against a left-handed stick, he’s shooting into the stick.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
by PPP on Apr 16, 2010 1:23 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, that was a super point. Go wide, AO, go wide!
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Bingo
And he gets to cut in on his forehand which I am sure he loves as much as I do.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
It’s not like he’s never faced lefty-defensemen before. The Montreal D just seem to do better at taking away the space in front of him.
The keyboard is mightier.
He’s faced them before but they are ALL left-handed defencemen. Even if he tries switching wings he will be facing guys who’s stick line up in a tough fashion for him. Another stat I read was that between the 6 D they have over 4000 games NHL experience.
That could be a perfect storm.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Could be, but oughtn’t be.
And the All Lefty defense presents some opportunities for the Caps as well.
Should be a good one on Saturday.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
the All Lefty defense presents some opportunities for the Caps as well.
Absolutely.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
All Lefty Defense? I’m waiting for MTL to suit up Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
They would show up for those bunch of Frenchies.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
by Rob Parker on Apr 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I see the point with the lefties, but come on, AO has been the best goal scorer in the league since he joined. If he hadn’t figured out how to score against lefty D he wouldn’t have that status. And some coach would have figured it out. It has more to do with his solo rush attempts than the handedness of the D.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
When D are playing him as tight as they were it doesn’t really matter if they are lefty or righty. And the D were able to play him so tight because he never backed them off with his speed (same reason he was never able to go wide on them when they stood him up). And he never backed them up with his speed because he was floating looking for the home run play instead of coming back and rushing up the ice through the neutral zone with speed (and the rest of his linemates). I’m convinced that last night was more about AO than it was the D.
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on Apr 16, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly. With OV’s speed this works.
D are taught to use their stick to force the offense to the outside and then drive them into the boards. With lefties, it’s always harder to drive someone to your left, because your stick has to be pointed inside – to the right. If the sticks stay left, the OV cuts left quickly. If the stick goes to the right to force OV to the outside, he should be able to go around them and turn their bodies.
It’s not just go wide — it’s go wide right.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
Fuck going wide. Fuck crossing the middle. Attack with your god damn teammates. They’ve got a little skill too, you know. Maybe supporting them and letting support you could work. Or we could keep going for 100 foot passes.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
by Rob Parker on Apr 16, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Take it someone didn’t have an enjoyable evening.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I know I didn’t.
You are in that wonderful spot of imagining the best of all outcomes for the Preds in anticipation of game 1 tonight. Enjoy it. Whether they win or lose, the feeling won’t come back until game 1 of the next series.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
Yes. Pollack told me this morning I’d be sour tomorrow but I asked him to let me have my damn optimism!
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
With a loss, you will be sour.
With a victory, you will convince yourself it’s a fluke or will fear with the Hawks will bring in game 2.
Either way, it’s not the same.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
Nah, if we win our first ever road game in the playoffs I’ll be fucking giddy.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m sober and I’ve slept and I’m still sour as hell. I couldn’t even go near a computer last night and I almost put a rock through a car window on my way home (sadly, I didn’t have a rock on me and wasn’t launching my phone at him).
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
I suggest either a) drinking more or b) waiting till Saturday night to throw rocks.
Nice sig, btw.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah, well. Just one game.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ll spare you the history lesson on “The Capitals and the playoffs.”
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
I know, I know. I tend to be overly optimistic.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s not a history lesson, its a horror movie box set.
"You ever use smelling salts, every time you type a bad blog?" Brooks Laich
by Carl Putnam on Apr 16, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, let me remove all the sharp objects and extension cords from the building if we’re going down this road.
"You want to start being part of the Rink? Fine, but more’s expected of you than John/Jane Cap Fan. Carry the cause of informed discussion to the unwashed masses and don’t crap in the yards of other SBN sites if you decide to go over there. They’re passionate about their teams too, no need to troll elsewhere and/or be a sore winner." --BP
It’s irrelevant. He wasn’t limping around the ice last night. He was neutralizing himself. If he’s hurt then that can’t help but I don’t really buy it.
For one, if he was so hurt that he’s ineffective in game 1, why was he playing in games 79-82?
For two, he’s played through injuries his whole career, and been successful. If this injury is that much worse then see point one.
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
why was he playing in games 79-82
For trophies? I don’t know, just asking.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Trophies seem like the answer, and is absolutely not acceptable to me. I’d never suggest you sit a healthy AO. But how do you play an injured AO with the playoffs around the corner?
BB is smart enough to know that. And that’s why I don’t buy the injuries. (Unless AO hid how bad it was.)
Tom Poti will never win a Cup.
Did he seem off the last 3 games of the regular season? If he did, that would lead me to believe something’s wrong.
Otherwise, he could’ve been under the weather.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I know he was slumping, dude, I’m talking about the eye test. He could be playing fine and not putting up any numbers.
On the Forecheck/Twitter/CLS
"What do you think this is? Major League Baseball?"- Shea Weber
by Chris Burton on Apr 16, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
The only plausible injury explanation would be that he got hurt in the final game of the season. Not out of the question. It’s true that he’s battled through injuries before and done fine. I actually tend to buy the illness rumor more. He played like he had Swine Flu.
Per Tarik
BB on Ovie injury rumors: “I heard a couple of people say last night that he might be playing hurt. No, we’re making excuses for him.”
Bah-Ram-Ewe, Ovechkin will wreck you. Fear the Furious Fleece!
Was Nicky drinking from a separate water bottle/cup on the bench? What about Ovi and Semin? Where is AlexG when you need him.
Lobbies: Green, Carlson, Orlov
That was TylerG and good pull. That was a remarkable piece of detail.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Apr 16, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
To the Deaf Ears and Denial in Section 401
As good as our boy is, imploring Ovechkin to “turn and burn” isn’t exactly the most effective strategy to employ against a Jacques-lead team committed to the trap.
Attack with your god damn teammates.
See? I am not the only saying this … as much as a one man wrecking ball Ovechkin is, he ain’t going to wreck much without the support of his teammates or allowing them to support him.
Win one. Do it sixteen times.
Well thats the whole point of the left-board charge/strafe into the high slot.
It’s to catch the defender positioning his stick on the board side, do get positioning if you were to talk it down the wall. Most defenders know that Ovie is not going to go down the wall, so they have their stick ready to track the puck when he strafes right.
If it works right, the defender has his stick towards the boars, Ovie dives right, has no problem ripping a shot off.
Last night, the defenders had their sticks towards the high slot ready to block ovie’s shot
Bah-Ram-Ewe, Ovechkin will wreck you. Fear the Furious Fleece!
My point above yours is that most D (at least where I coach) are taught to position their stick towards the inside, so the forward can’t cut in. Then the D should crunch the forward along the boards. If you put your stick towards the boards, you are actually forcing the player to the center.
Furthermore, a left D on the right side finds it awkward putting his stick towards the board, so he most often keeps it in the center. That’s why OV was playing right into the D. He need to come down the right along the boards and have a natural angle to the net. Going left towards the boards isn’t the best play and going to the center from the left is blocked.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
Well, where i play, the D usually have position between the player and the goal, so they’d have to take the body to cut in (which doesnt usually happen).
The stick does force the player to the center, but the your sequencing is off.
It isn’t the defense making a move on Ovie, then Ovie reacts.
Ovie makes a move towards the boards, the defense reacts, Ovie strafes right.
Bah-Ram-Ewe, Ovechkin will wreck you. Fear the Furious Fleece!
I remembered the block quote. For the past two days, I heard the phrase “a guy named Jacques behind the bench” looping in the back of my mind. I’m glad you have something concrete to add to the analysis instead of suggesting that the Caps just can’t overcome the trap. They can…if they add a couple more tools. This is where those speedy trade acquisitions need to get their feet moving.
"Camaraderie, that's what the Washington Capitals are all about."
I think they’re only caught in a trap if they can’t walk out
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions
Glad I’m not the only one with “Suspicious Minds” in his head now.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Off topic/
I love Elvis’ version, but Dwight Yoakam’s version kills it.
/End off topic
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Ultimately, a Stanley Cup-winning team will have to prevail over each of its opponents regardless of what system they are using. I propose the Caps do that starting Saturday.
Now helping to keep an eye on all things Gr8 at Alex Ovetjkin.
It's one game
T he Habs played like it was a game 7. They won’t be able to sustain the same effort and tempo throughout the series, hopefully, the Caps will be able to sustan presure and the scoring will materialize in the next 4 games.
Why don’t we just score on the power play. Much easier than beating the trap and we would have won had we done that once.
"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"
by MikeyGreen on Apr 16, 2010 2:00 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Jack Adams? Is that you?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 16, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
It’s not Jack. Jack would have suggested that we score more goals.
Watching more games on Slingbox than anyone else!
I think its Jack Daniel
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Just saying that 2 goals 5 on 5 against one of the lowest scoring 5 on 5 teams in the league when we have a powerplay that is so superior this year should be enough to win when our goalie plays a solid game like Theo had.
Our PP didnt score for many reasons (praying small sample size) but I think our shot selection was poor. Rather than move the puck around the team just listened to the fans when they were yelling “shoot” rather than being cutsie, getting halak out of position and then shooting. Yes, I want more cutesie.
Note also that the team is 1-5 in OT games during the post lockout era. Call it the Alex Ovechkin era, the Bruce era, the Boyd Gordon Era. Someone needs to win it.
"Have you ever played?" "Yes, I was a goalie"
Not enough puck possession. No adjustment to counter MTL’s adjustment. That’s a pretty sure recipe for a loss.
It's all happening
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Apr 16, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
SO SIMPLE IT WORKS!
Rec’d because you made me laugh. I hope we start getting some PP goals, I know they are trying and they want them. The PP is just sort of streaky…
I look to the future because that's where I'm going to spend the rest of my life.
So true…Power play is 1 for 14 in the last 3 home games. If we get four power play opps, would should get one goal.
by Direction 87 on Apr 16, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Beat me to it, I grabbed a shot from the cruiser bridge and stashed it away last night in waiting for this discussion, then the work thing… guess I should rec it then :)
make it green IMO.
Someone should photoshop Jacques Martin’s head on Ackbar’s body in that shot on the cruiser bridge.
ugh
I ain't a playa, I just Puck alot
by Gr8Laichs on Apr 16, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting points on the left handed D men vs Ovi. However I guarantee Ovi knows this already, instinctively, and doesn’t have to “think” about going wide or where the D men sticks are.
I think his problem last night was that he was being predictable. It seemed any time he touched the puck he got that look I his eye that he was gonna try to do the something magical and prove his worth.
Now that he was completely shut down, HE needs to make the adjustment (just as BB might want to adjust with a dump and chase plan) and set up the play rather than taking 500 shots towards the net that get blocked.
If they can establish possession in the zone using dump and chase, maybe it will be easier for Ovi to drift away from defenders shadowing him while the fight for possesion is taking place. If the Caps win that possession battle maybe they can find Ovi while he still has some room to move and he can shoot or create in that space.
Or maybe just bench Ovi for game 2 and really confuse the sit out of the Habs? LOL
Et lux in tenebris lucet
by burgundyNgold on Apr 16, 2010 2:39 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Ovie overheard in the lockerroom today:
“Honest… I ran out of gas. I, I had a flat tire. I didn’t have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn’t come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts. IT WASN’T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD.”
we won’t have the blues for long, brother.
I thought Ovechkin looked more like sick and less like injured. Not unlike Backstrom, his game had a glassy, NyQuil quality. Watery backchecks and flop-sweat passes, itchy with the puck and dying to glide otherwise.
It’ll be a different tune tomorrow.
Hey let's go, today is going to be our night
I thought Ovechkin looked more like sick and less like injured.
Me too. He looked gassed almost every time he went back to the bench.
He still looked tired and lackluster today at Kettler.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
You mean when he wasn’t on the ice for the whole day?
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Am I missing snark? Most of the players from yesterday’s game, including Ovie, weren’t on the ice for practice this morning. But Ovie was around and each time I saw him he was yawning his head off and didn’t have the spark he normally has.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
I was actually a little encouraged after seeing his interview this morning…I have bcaked off the ledge a few inches, but I swear he still aint right.
I ain't a playa, I just Puck alot
Oh yes, he did well in the interviews and he was in front of the cameras taking questions for a long time. It was during the out of the spotlight moments where he looked like he needed a long, refreshing nap.
(Yes, I know about the avatar hounding - just pretend mine is invisible.)
Someone called up a sports talk show to say that they reported seeing Ovi throwing up while on the bench.
If that’s true, they would have been better off playing Brendan Morrison than Ovi. Seriously. If he’s sick enough to throw up, he should NOT be playing in any way, shape, or form. Instead he’s being ineffective and passing along his ailment to his teammates.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Aside from essentially seeing this first part of this comment reposted in the thread, the mere notion of sitting the two-time defending MVP is absurd beyond words.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on Apr 16, 2010 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I don’t normally advocate sitting our MVP for the playoffs. Yes, the notion is crazy. I’ll be the first to admit that.
But there is a minimum standard of health one should meet. It’s one thing to puke due to nerves and still play.
But it’s another thing to try to play with a stomach flu when you’re puking.
Yes, I’ll admit it is a second hand report. And likely of dubious reliability. So it is a source that we have to take with a grain of salt. But it is a possibility that had to be considered; i .e. is Ovi okay or not.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Last time I checked…
It’s. The. Fucking. Playoffs.
Guys play with anything from deep bruises to broken bones and recently removed spleens. Having an ‘icky tum tum’ falls in that spectrum somewhere.
They're coming.
by Bald Pollack on Apr 17, 2010 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
So someone calling into a sports talk show had something no one else had… ok.
Besides, Donovan McNabb was barfing on the field in one of the great drives by a quarterback I’ve ever witnessed, so I’m totally cool with the pukin’.
Sidenote: I just totally got myself psyched for McNabb in D.C.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 16, 2010 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Good article, precisely what I said – well not nearly in as much detail – in response to a study and strategy comment. The boys found it very hard to enter the offensive zone. On the PPs we didn’t win every draw but we atleast fought to get the puck – once we lost zone pressure though, about 30-60 seconds into the PP, the remaining time would be spent trying and failing to get back into the zone.
Backstrom’s goal came on a defensive zone break down and possibly the only one against Montreal. Most of our other chances their scheme was fully rooted in place and prevented seconday shots and collapsed on any and all rebounds Halak let go.
Bruce Boudreau when asked about Brooks Laich's return to the lineup, he said: "He just adds another dimension to our team. If it was puzzle, he just fits that thing. He completes us."
Great pic of Ovie.
I agree that more dump and chase will get the Baxter line going, but that’s not really an option for 28/14/21. If they can buckle down and skate the puck hard with speed, together through the neutral zone, and stop trying to stretch it out every breakout they might find themselves with the puck in the offensive zone more often. Last night it felt like they just got lazy and tried to thread that cross ice pass through the middle of the ice that MTL is anticipating the entire time.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Apr 16, 2010 3:59 PM EDT reply actions
On second thought, maybe just getting it in deep is the right answer all around. If Flash can “lead” the forecheck and force the puck up the boards, Sasha and Brooks can win some battles. The real question is whether this team is ready to grind out a few wins, or do they think they can continue to play their game and come out of this postseason with any amount of success. Not sure what the answer is.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Apr 16, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Simply put: It's time to simplify
My blog from http://www.thecheckingline.com and http://www.goodoldhockeyblog.blogspot.com offers some thoughts on this very topic:
In scanning the blogosphere – at least the D.C. version – there are a lot of people saying that the Washington Capitals controlled play and dominated in the shot, hit and faceoff department in last night’s Game 1 NHL Eastern Conference Quarterfinal overtime loss to Montreal. No need to panic is the battle cry. Washington was the better team. Once a game gets into overtime anything can happen, and the Habs capitalized on an opportunity. That’s playoff hockey.
A closer look, however, reveals that last night’s 3-2 Montreal victory was truly a tale of two games, and the lesson that the Caps need to learn can be found easily enough by watching the opening 20 minutes on tape and committing that to memory.
For those who chose to watch Buffalo’s Game 1 victory against Boston and tuned in to the Caps-Habs contest late, it would be understandable to think Washington dominated given the Caps’ 47-38 advantage in shots, the 37-24 margin in hits and the 45-27 advantage in the faceoff circle. Breaking it down, however, Montreal outshot Washington 31-28 after the first period and captured 15 of 29 faceoffs during the third period and overtime – obviously the crucial point of the game.
The first period, however, was a different story and really illustrates how the Caps can potentially dominate the rest of this series if they want to commit to that style of play. Washington came out flying, pushing the puck to the outside and using its speed and strength to get the puck in deep and create offensive chances. The Caps finished every check, generated plenty of shots and rebound opportunities and did a pretty good job crashing the net and creating traffic. Less than a minute into the game Jason Chimera blew past Marc-Andre Bergeron along the left wing boards and drew a penalty, allowing the league’s top power-play unit an opportunity to give Washington the upper hand. And Joe Corvo’s game-tying goal was a typical playoff-style marker, a well-placed floater thrown on net through traffic. Playoff hockey at its best.
For much of the period the Caps’ forwards seemed either too fast, too strong or both for the Habs’ defensive corps. It looked to be only a matter of time before Washington’s high-powered attack would heat up and give the Caps the lead. That’s when Jaroslav Halak stole the game. Certainly he was very strong throughout the evening, but he allowed the Canadiens to weather that storm and left Washington frustrated and somewhat drained heading into the second period.
On the bad side for the Caps in that opening 20 minutes was a silly penalty taken by Nick Backstrom that came with Washington holding a decided advantage in play and allowed Mike Cammalleri to net his first goal since January to give the Habs some hope. While Washington finished the season with the NHL’s top power play, connecting on better than 25 percent of its opportunities, the Canadiens are extremely dangerous with the man advantage as well, ranking No. 2 in the league and converting better than 21 percent of the time. The Caps are a decent penalty-killing team at home, but ranked near the bottom of the league overall, so staying out of the box is a key to their success.
And speaking of the power play, that was the other disappointing area for the Caps in the opening stanza. They went 0-for-2 in the first 20 minutes and finished the night 0-for-4, making them 1-for-15 with the extra man over their last five home contests.
It didn’t take long to see that the Caps were out of sync on the power play. Good shots were passed up. Long-range shots and low-percentage, pressured shots from the outside were attempted. Passes to players open for one-timers in scoring areas wound up in their skates or arrived bouncing or fluttering. Something wasn’t clicking. Perhaps they were too cute or trying to be too perfect and ended up trying to force things with the penalty clock winding down. No matter, the power play is something that has carried this team and must continue to do so. If the Caps aren’t scoring on the power play, Montreal’s potent extra-man attack combined with Washington’s less-than-stellar penalty killing suddenly tilts the balance slightly back in the Habs’ direction going forward.
"When you outshoot a team 19-7 in the first period, you know it’s not going to end up 57-21," said Washington coach Bruce Boudreau. "I was a little worried after the first period. We had a 1-1 tie, but I think we outplayed them them pretty badly in the first, and usually when you do that and you don’t get a 3-0 or 3-1 lead, things can start to change. They are going to go into their dressing room and get hell from the coach or he’s going to say that now it’s our turn and at some point something’s going to happen to turn the game the other way. "
Once the second period started you could sense there was a change in approach from the Caps. Montreal continued to clog the ice in all three zones, and Washington started going for the home run – the long breakout pass and the stretch pass to the far blue line. Instead of the Caps using their speed advantage to the outside, getting the puck in deep, cycling, moving the puck and going to the net, they started playing a lot of east-west hockey with dipsy-dos at the blue line and fancy passes that led to countless offsides and more long-range, blockable shots. And for some reason, the Caps’ defense, which had been rock-solid in the first period, began to play hot potato with the puck, rushing and forcing passes and clears. They simply were not making the simple play.
When the Caps did get the puck in deep it seemed like one player – Mike Knuble, for instance – would go into the corner on his own and dig for the puck while his linemates kind of floated around in the slot area waiting for him to break free and make a pass. That instead of outnumbering the Canadiens in the corner and coming out with control to set up a situation where the Habs’ forwards would have to leave their assignment to help out in front of the net. Once you get the defense rotating and scrambling, the offense can originate from the point through either a clear shot to the goal or a fake shot that draws another defensive player out of position and leaves an offensive player open in even better scoring position.
All of that played right into the Canadiens’ hands. Montreal’s defensemen, Andrei Markov in particular, have no issue with giving up their bodies to protect the net. The Habs played back off of Washington’s forwards and pressured the pointmen, letting the forced shots from the blue line either carom off their bodies or scoot harmlessly past the net. Then, when Washington did get some open looks at the goal in the third period and overtime, the Caps rushed their shots and usually fired high or wide.
Ultimately, in overtime the Caps defensemen seemed extremely tentative moving the puck out of their own end and misread a couple of key loose-puck situations in neutral ice. One misread by Jeff Schultz led to a near-breakaway for Brian Gionta. The other by Shaone Morrisonn gave Tomas Plekanec the space he needed to fire a pinpoint bullet past Jose Theodore, whose outstanding 35-save performance was overshadowed by Halak’s brilliant 45-stop effort.
"We had a lot of shots on goal," Boudreau said, "but I don’t think that we had a lot of great, quality chances. And when we did get quality chances we shot wide or didn’t get a shot off at all. We had a 2-on-1 late in the third and a 3-on-1 in overtime and didn’t get a shot of. I thought Halak played good, but he didn’t do anything we didn’t think he could do."
So, let’s go back to the video. Working on the theory that positive reinforcement builds confidence this time of year, the Caps only need to watch the opening 20 minutes and lock in on the following: use speed to push the puck to the outside and then hammer the Canadiens’ physically in their own end, outnumber the Habs’ in the corners and then make the simple pass to move the puck quickly, immediately go to the net once the pass is made to the open man, take the open shot when it’s there and crash the net, limit the hot goaltender’s impact by getting pucks to the net and creating rebounds, make the easy and available pass in the defensive end and neutral zone and stay out of the box.
"I think we can play harder all the way around – from the top to the bottom – and that will reflect in the score, " said Washington winger Mike Knuble, who led the first-period charge with six shots on goal. "I think maybe we need to bear down a little more around the net. This time of year you’re not pulling up trying to find people. If you get a little break, you get some speed and you get the puck to the net and somebody’s got to go in for the rebound."
In other words, it’s time to simplify. The question is whether the Caps will get that message a game earlier than they did a year ago or will Red Nation be sent into panic mode yet again?
by Slowevechkin on Apr 16, 2010 4:03 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
No, I think it was placed properly here. :: waving hi to “The Checking Line” ::
Now helping to keep an eye on all things Gr8 at Alex Ovetjkin.
dumping and chasing is not what the Caps do best, but doing it can bear benefits down the road. Montreal’s defensemen are not especially mobile. Make them turn their bodies, make them put their back to the play, and punish them along the boards. If Montreal’s game in the neutral zone is to put up a wall and keep from making mistakes, then play the game lower — dump the puck around them and punish them into mistakes.
If you've read this far...seek help.








































