Sweet Swede
In the summer of 2006, just after the Washington Capitals selected Nicklas Backstrom with the 4th overall pick in the NHL Draft, I remember reading an ESPN The Magazine story that was written as a ‘fly on the wall’ piece from inside the Columbus Blue Jackets’ Draft War Room. Going through their prospect list, the Jackets’ Player Personnel Director had this to say about Backstrom:
“I was watching tape of him playing with Henrik Zetterberg at the worlds, and sometimes I couldn't tell which was which.”
I remember how much that line stuck with me and how I dreamt that the Caps would someday have a Zetterberg-like player to compliment Alex Ovechkin and make us an offensive threat. Now, two and a half seasons into Backstrom’s career, I think it’s time to see if that initial comparison had panned out.
First, let’s look at Backstrom’s numbers from his first 3 seasons. Since his 3rd season is ongoing, I’ve included a ‘production per-82 games’ line for comparisons sake:
Backstrom
|
GP |
G |
A |
PTS |
+/- |
|
82 |
14 |
55 |
69 |
13 |
|
82 |
22 |
66 |
88 |
16 |
|
55 |
23 |
40 |
63 |
26 |
|
82 |
23 |
61 |
84 |
21 |
And now for Henrik Zetterberg:
Zetterberg
|
GP |
G |
A |
PTS |
+/- |
|
79 |
22 |
22 |
44 |
6 |
|
61 |
15 |
28 |
43 |
15 |
|
77 |
39 |
46 |
85 |
29 |
|
82 |
29 |
36 |
65 |
19 |
Like Zetterberg, Backstrom’s numbers have improved each season and their solid +/- numbers speak to their defensive ability. Unlike Zetterberg, Backstrom was able to put up better offensive numbers as a 20 year old, with Zetterberg being 22 during his rookie season. He has also been more durable in his first three season, as the discrepancy in games played shows. In Zetterberg’s corner is the fact that he was selected in the 7th round and worked his way into the payer he is today.
What about other great Swedish players? It took longer for fellow Swedes Daniel Anfredsson, Henrik and Daniel Sedin and Markus Naslund to gain star form, so comparing their first 3 seasons would result in a blow-out in Backstrom's favor. One could also draw comparisons between Backstrom and Kent Nilsson, who put up huge numbers in the offensive ‘80s. For now, we’ll stick to talent Backstrom has actually played against.
One of these comparable players, numbers-wise, is the #1 overall pick in the 1989 NHL Draft, Mats Sundin.
Sundin
|
GP |
G |
A |
PTS |
+/- |
|
80 |
23 |
36 |
59 |
-24 |
|
80 |
33 |
43 |
76 |
-19 |
|
80 |
47 |
67 |
114 |
21 |
|
82 |
35 |
50 |
85 |
-8 |
Sundin was 19 during his rookie season and played on some defensively terrible Nordiques teams early in his career, which explains the massive +/- hole he dug for himself. But in his 3rd year, he broke out for big numbers. Like Backstrom, Sundin also played with elite talent (Joe Sakic, Peter Forsberg) and also played center. But if you compare adjusted statistics, Sundin’s numbers drop based on the era in which he played. Meanwhile, Backstrom’s adjusted numbers actually increase a bit, pulling him away from his Swedish peer.
The best comparison is with a fellow centerman selected in the first round in his draft year, Peter Forsberg. Right off the bat, the two appear very similar: Forsberg was selected with the 6th overall pick, and was 21 during his rookie season (which occurred during the Players’ strike season, explaining the 47 games played).
Forsberg
|
GP |
G |
A |
PTS |
+/- |
|
47 |
15 |
35 |
50 |
17 |
|
82 |
30 |
86 |
116 |
25 |
|
65 |
28 |
58 |
86 |
31 |
|
82 |
31 |
76 |
107 |
31 |
Clearly, Forsberg entered the league as an elite offensive talent, put up stellar numbers, and would eventually win an MVP and scoring title to go along with his 2 Stanley Cups. But his durability began to slip after his second season and he would only play more than 70 games 4 more times in his career. However, throughout his abbreviated career, many considered him to be the best all-around player in the league.
So, after three seasons, that initial comparison to Henrik Zetterberg seems fully warranted, if not a bit of an underassessment of Backstrom’s talent. Statistically, Backstrom falls behind only Peter Forsberg among Swedish players in their first three seasons. While he likely won’t surpass ‘Peter the Great’ as the best Swedish player (not named Lidstrom) in NHL history, he most certainly can reach ‘Nicklas the Really, Really, Really Good’ status.
If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
16 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice. I am surprised to see how favorable he rates to both Zetterberg and Forsberg. That says a TON about Nick.
PuckDaddy be damned, I'm putting CincoCinco on the back of a Schultz jersey!
Forsberg’s hands with Zetterberg’s ankles/feet. Though those 107 + 116 points seasons are just a little bit sick.
IS KEPTIN NOW
Backs’ ability to keep the puck on his stick has always been incredible, but these last few weeks its been as if he’s hitting a whole new level. I’ve found myself often watching and wondering “how the hell does he do that?” On his feet, off his feet, through impossibly small holes, the puck just seems to stick right to his blade.
He is going to be seriously good for a long time. Hopefully the caps will be able to sign him to a long term deal… I’ll order my jersey tonight if he extends his contract!
I'll say it again.
You don’t have one yet?
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
Great look and I rec’d it, but a small request: can you put the jump in somewhere? My mobile browser displays all fanposts until the jump, so it gets very cumbersome to scroll through the page.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Feb 1, 2010 3:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Are you sure about the projected stats for Nicky? He’s not expected to score another goal all year?
Game-Over Green? Canada-Over Carlson!
I believe that’s the per-82 game pace from their careers to that point.
Only YOU can prevent idiots from commenting!
by Knee high to a duck on Feb 1, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
Ah. That makes sense.
Game-Over Green? Canada-Over Carlson!
by Scott in Shaw on Feb 1, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
I heard much more about Forsberg than Hank when he was drafted. I was excited, but thought that was a ridiculously high bar to set. Lately, I’m not sure that projection was that far off. Nick’s game is incredible in all zones, his physical play and goal scoring are already above average and are definitely getting better as he learns to strike the balance. He doesn’t have the snarl of Foppa but if we can trade the snarl for durability I’ll take it in a heartbeat.
Now let's say you and I go toe to toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.
Great job with this research. Really shows how good Backstrom has been to start his career. But did you try adjusting for the fact that Backstrom gets all of his points from secondary assists to Ovechkin?
Of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst
by Killer_Carlson on Feb 1, 2010 9:06 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Well done sir. I like F&B’s comparison: a more durable, less snarly version of Forsberg.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Feb 1, 2010 10:16 PM EST reply actions
While he likely won’t surpass ‘Peter the Great’ as the best Swedish player (not named Lidstrom) in NHL history
I disagree: if Backs stays healthy and continues his trend (he’s a top 5 C in the league, IMO), he’ll put up better/similar numbers, for a longer period of time than Foppa was ever able to.
And he’ll get his Cups: of that I have no doubt.
by DrinkingPartner on Feb 2, 2010 10:36 AM EST reply actions






































