Thursday Caps Clips: Roller Coaster Night Ends Right
Your savory breakfast links:
- Recaps and other assorted musings on last night's SO win from us, Vogs (lots of don't-miss goodies at the end of this recap), NHL.com (Masisak), Carrera (blog, gamer), McNally (blog, gamer), Caps365 video (Boudreau, players, Wilson), CSN Washington (Beninati), Frankovic, TBD (Chamberlain), Examiner (Hoffman), Caps News Network, OFB, RtR, RMNB, Puckhead, clydeorama (pics), Caps In Pictures (pics), plus Pension Plan Puppets and The Checking Line for the Leafs perspective.
- Fight! [Caps Outsider]
- The named "'secondary scoring' options" potted a goal and three helpers last night. Write more articles like this, Corey. [NHL.com (Masisak)]
- The first line would also like a word. [National Post]
- Second star of the game, the coveted Hard Hat, and a Movember update. Things are going pretty well for Jason Chimera. [CO]
- EJ Hradek kicks off his annual Calder Watch with a couple of familiar names. [ESPN ($)]
- The quest for consistency. [The Fourth Period]
- The Caps' farm system drops a notch in the rankings, but still ranks in the top-five thanks to a generous definition of the word "prospect." [Hockey's Future]
- Our goal horn holds the promise of free wings. Top that, Tampa! [Puck Daddy]
- Tom Poti has recovered from his scary eye injury. Now, if he can only recover from his latest ailment, we'd be in business. [Slap Shot]
- A review of the Japers' Rink Radio podcasts. We thank you for your kind words. [Blueliner]
- Finally, happy 32nd birthday to Rick Berry.
549 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sorry, the King and Orr fight looked more like a 90 second battle for leverage. At least the Crosby fight was more entertaining, albeit quicker.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
Looked more like two monkeys humping a football to me.
Bizarre timing, bad fight, and just awful awful piped-in “Rocky” music at the VC.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Agreed. Though if the fight had been better, and not so mis-timed, perhaps the music would have been a plus. That said, I think we’ve been seeing the real D.J. King the past 3 times: confused with the puck; way out of position during breakouts from his own end; and fighting because it’s his job, not because it’s time to do his job.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Yeah, the Rocky music almost made me forget the video they did pre-game for Neuvirth’s RotM announcement (Instant Karma FTW).
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
They should have gotten 5-minute delay of game majors.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
Agreed. That fight served no purpose other than for each guy to put another notch on their belts.
I really think they need to schedule such things during TV timeouts. Tell the refs before the game that you want to go. Have the PA announcer inform the crowd and let Comcast sell the fight to a sponsor.
This heavyweight battle brought to you by Ameritel.
Then have the triplets score the fight and the loser gets an extra two minute penalty.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Nov 4, 2010 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Orr was obviously trying to get his team pumped up, he is the one that started things
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
Six minutes into a relatively even game and Orr needs to fire his team up? I doubt it. I saw those guys talk on the first shift together so you know they planned that. Wouldn’t be surprised if they texted each other before the game. King was a willing participant as he skated directly towards Orr. Orr may have gotten the jump on King but DJ knew exactly what was coming.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
They were probably high fiving each other during the first intermission. Planned fights between enforcers are lame.
That fight was also embarrassing. The Green/Kovy thrilla in vanilla fight was actually more entertaining than Orr/King
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
more entertaining
Well duh, the Green/Kovy fight was just flat out hilarious.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
And nobody knows quality fights like Ameritel. Have you met the triplets?
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Speaking of sponsorships at the game, I really hate the new annoucement for the Power Play as the “Constellation Energy Power Play.” Call it the “C-E Power Play” or something, that name is too damn long.
And what’s with the skating duck in the video for the “American Pest Penalty Kill”? A duck??
"I would feed them lefts until I was pretty much tired of doing it." - Alan May, JRR, 10.16.2010
I miss the Pepco Energy Services Power Play. Especially the announcement.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Yea…Pepco was awesome. Constellation just doesn’t have the same ring to it.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Rolled off the tongue. The new one is just too much.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
my tweet from last night:
Scripted music during a fight. Is that new or did I block it out b4 now. So stupid #Caps
and then later the we want wings when they tied it up at four and before they even announced the goal….Unbelievable except it happened
There’s a missed opportunity if they don’t play “that’s my DJ” when he fights.
by Wheeler on Nov 4, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Flyers have a ringing bell (or at least used it during the Isles game over the weekend).
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks. I wasn’t asking about other teams, but about the Caps, that Rocky music last night was the lamest of the lame. Couldn’t believe I was hearing it.
A bell in Philly, yeah, why does that not surprise me.
I thought VC had played Rocky in fights before, but I might be wrong.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
If true, then I am glad I was able to block it out before now; I know in-game entertainment isn’t hockey ops, but there have to be some limits on this crap/stupidity/ridiculousness.
Some of us are there to actually watch a hockey game!
Heartily agreed.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Usually they play the mortal kombat song, don’t they?
This sig is brought to you by... Frungy, The Sport of Kings!
Finish him!!!
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
How very Pavlovian.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Yeah, the prompting of the wings chant was also an offense to my sensibilities.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Yeah, beyond idiotic to do that in a 4-4 game.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Nov 4, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Any chance it’s automatically programmed as part of the video montage following the 4th goal scored? I doubt it’s possible that every single piece of music and video is done on the fly by the arena producers. I don’t necessarily want to see it, but it’d be interesting to see what happens if the Caps score a 4th after being down 8-3 or something. Do we still want wings?
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good question, valid point, and to answer your question, no – we want defensemen.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Nov 4, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I assumed this was a possibility in terms of the programming, but it doesn’t excuse it. Does it usually show up as part of the celebration before they even announce the goal; maybe that’s new this season? I thought they put it up on the screen after, but not during the initial celebration of goal #4. It’s simply silly/stupid to have it built in to the goal celebration regardless of the score so if that’s the issue, it does not excuse it from my perspective. Even if there is a sponsor, it should not be part of every 4th goal celebration and not during the initial video montage, but then I think the dancing stuff as part of the goal celebrations is too much, as well.
it’d be interesting to see what happens if the Caps score a 4th after being down 8-3 or something. Do we still want wings?
I’ll take yours if you don’t want them.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
If there is an automatic video montage for wings after the Caps score a fourth goal, they should play this clip from Step Brothers instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP-NL8mkylY
Caps PA or message on the jumbotron: “Hey Caps fans, the Caps have scored 4 goals tonight.”
Queue John C Reilly: “What if I want wings? That’s not enough..!”
It would be nice if King was going to get into meaningless fights that he would win. Orr got the grab, locked his arm, and was able to control the whole thing and land tons of those little 4inch jabs.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
I thought I heard Joe B & Locker say at one point that Orr basically jumped King, started going at him before he was ready and King was getting hit while he still had his gloves on. As for the fight itself, King couldn’t seem to get his arm out to punch with, so they kept spinning round and bouncing off the boards.
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
Yeah I kept waiting for King to come back with a flurry, but he just couldn’t get loose. Good job by Orr on that front.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Orr definitely caught King a bit by surprise.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
…but back to Crosby. Color me impressed.
"I don't care about winning the division or winning the President's Trophy. I just care about getting to the playoffs." --GMGM
maybe on Dec 23 he’d like to show off his new-found fighting skills to Brads, or Erskine, or Hendricks?
Also, I was watching the fight, I thought it was illegal to fight with your helmet on if you had a face shield, both of them did in Crosby’s fight
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
It’s only illegal to instigate a fight with a visor (i.e. the refs are going to give you the instigator penalty). Otherwise I think it’s just a violation of the Code.
This sig is brought to you by... Frungy, The Sport of Kings!
maybe on Dec 23 he’d like to show off his new-found fighting skills to Brads, or Erskine, or Hendricks?
Nah, I think he’s just practicing for his imminent fight with Carcillo.
Lobbies: Green, Carlson, Orlov
Wow. Who knew the Golden Child had it in him? He gets points in my book.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, well, well. That there was some very respectable fighting by #87. Tip of the cap, sir.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Okay fighting. Impressive skating. I think it takes farm equipment to get that jerk off-balance in skates.
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
Crosby is really strong. He went down to a knee and kept holding on and had the strength to not only get back up, but to force his opponent into a lower position, seemingly all in one motion. I was impressed.
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
He threw him around like Chara threw around McCabe. Not much in the way of punches, but he pretty much destroyed him. With that being said, stop getting into fights. The NHL needs a TV contract, not part of the ad revenue sitting in the press box with a broken hand.
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
Other fights I’ve seen Sid try to get into, the officials run over quick as can be and break it up. “Oh no, Mr. Paycheck, none of that, sir.”
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
by EmilyB on Nov 4, 2010 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was watching that game when it happened, and was also quite impressed by Crosby’s ability on that fight!
I like Laich, but I <3 Green
by RockinRed4Life on Nov 4, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Fighting in hockey is part of the game. It’s an aspect of the game that makes me love it so much, at least in the sense that two guys are allowed to settle their own differences, and it keeps (some) players accountable for their actions. In any other sport, baseball, football, basketball, etc…if two guys started throwing punches at each other mid-game, it would be all they would talk about on SportsCenter for a full week and both players would probably get suspended by whatever league they were playing in. In hockey, it’s 5 min in the box, and let’s get on with the game, nothing to see here folks… When fights have a purpose, when it’s one teammate sticking up for another one, when it’s about making sure the other guys know not to mess to our guys, I’m all for it.
What I cannot stand, however, are fights like this. Before the game even started everyone knew it was gonna happen. Why? Just because Orr and King were in the lineups—everyone knew the moment they got out there on the same shift the gloves would drop? But why? There was nothing to prove, no real scores to settle, no message to really be sent. Is it because “the fans love fights!” or just because they wanted to “set the tone”? No, I don’t buy it. If it was the former, I’d just like to say to King right now that I’m much more impressed with someone who can play quality minutes on the ice. Fights like this feel staged and forced upon us, and I don’t really see the point of it. Everyone cheers a bit, they go to the box, and the game just picks up right where it left off. Hell, it doesn’t even seem to fire up the benches! If Orr wanted to drop the gloves, I’m not saying King shouldn’t have accepted the challenge…I’m just not sure why there should have been a challenge in the first place. Let’s play hockey, and let that other bullshit work itself out as needed.
"I am ready for his provocations"
twitter
by PaintDrinkingPete on Nov 4, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
I mostly agree. Though I don’t think that Orr and King fought because the fans love fights. I think that they fought because it’s part of what they see as their job. In King’s case, I think it’s a way for him to prove to Boudreau that he “deserves” a sweater. I don’t know about Orr.
The problem is, I don’t think King does himself too many favors by engaging in the pointless fights. Once a fight starts, I want the Cap to win it. But 90% of the time I don’t want there to be a fight.
Fights should have specific significance to the TEAM. If a hockey team needs somebody to take a 5 minute penalty to make them play hard, there’s a problem with the bench. But if a teammate sends a message to the opposition about taking liberties with a goalie or skill player (and that happens a lot) then there was a team purpose. There are other instances too, of course, I merely think of this as the almost always acceptable impetus for a fight.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
My point exactly.
Also, I wish BB would say to King, “Look, there will be times we will need you step up and throw some punches, but if you want to earn a sweater every night, it’s gonna be through solid play — our fans will be no more or less impressed either by meaningless fights started on the ice”.
"I am ready for his provocations"
twitter
by PaintDrinkingPete on Nov 4, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I think fights like this occur due to the ego of the two combatants. Both want to establish themselves as heavyweight enforcers and see how they measure up against other heavyweights. I don’t think Orr and King have fought before so even more of a reason to drop mitts. It’s two guys trying to mark their territory. It’s stupid and really should be penalized more than just a five minute major.
There are many arguments why its good to guy like King or Orr on your bench; some legitimate, some specious at best. Staged fighting is not one of them.
I personally think that fights that occur outside the parameters of the game such as upon the drop of the puck or when there has been no observable contact which precipitated the fight should come with 10 minute misconducts. That would include a fight like Sid had last night and a couple of the late game brawls from the home opener vs. the Devils.
I’m not opposed to fighting so long as it is done to serve it’s purpose. As you noted, to allow the boys to police themselves and be accountable for their actions.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
King could have felt the ice was tilting away from the Caps. They have issues in the first period, if he needs to step up and create the allegory of “hey team, this is how it needs to be” by clobbering someone I am in favor of it. Whether that is his mindset, I am not sure.
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
Six minutes into a tie game against a struggling team on the road playing their second of a back-to-back he decides the ice was tilting? If that’s how he sees the game, he needs to be eating nachos. I definitely saw he and Orr tap each other in front of the net during their first shift together about 2-3 minutes into the game. They knew they were going to dance next time out.
If the team needs to see him throw hands in order to “step up” at that point in the game, they’ve got bigger problems than we can possibly imagine.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
DJ King can either fight, and make $500,000 a year, or he’ll have to go back to Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan.* Oh, and there are dozens of guys in lower leagues trying their best to prove that they can fight and play hockey a least as well as DJ King so they can get an NHL contract.
With that kind of pressure, is it any wonder he fights every chance he gets?
- To be clear, if it was me, I’d pick Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan over Boogaard, Shelley, and Orr.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Its only a penalty if you instigate w/ a visor. There was clearly no instigator there.
What precipitated that? And why was Sid not taking the faceoff in the first place?
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
yeah, I just read that.
Maybe Sid had gotten tossed from the faceoff? Or maybe he really wanted to fight. Those two were going at it pretty fiercely, maybe he got pissed and traded off the faceoff so he could fight.
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
Letang and Morrow went just before that and they were still down by 3, so I’m guessing it was an attempt to light a fire under the boys.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
Precipitated by Morrow going after Letang a few minutes earlier to fight him when Letang already had an injured hand he was playing with. Crosby said in the post-game he was sticking up for Letang and showing the Stars that “dat shit ain’t right” ( my words not Sid’s).
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
I actually have no problem with this. Good for him for trying to spark his team a bit in a somewhat lopsided game and for sticking up for a teammate…even if it means fighting a guy like Nisky who doesn’t really fight :P
What did bug me was a comment I read from Jeff Marek on Twitter – something along the lines of he’d rather see his superstar fight five times a year than block 5 shots a game. I don’t mind them doing it occasionally if it’s organic or if it’s done to fire up the team, but I think guys are more appreciative of a teammate for knowingly sacrificing the body for the team, i.e. blocking a shot, than they are of a guy throwing punches.
I’m sure he’s thinking in terms of potential injury, which I get, and maybe I’m misjudging what’s important to NHLers…but I’d rather see Ovie block shots than fight any day of the week.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Maybe he was considering the risk of injury from blocking a shot? How long has Johansson been out?
"It's always good to have vikings."
Marcus is out with a bad hip flexor after catching a rut in the ice with his skate blade in Boston.
And speaking of whom, miss you Mackan! Hurry back.
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
Oh yeah, I don’t know why I keep associating that with the blocked shot. But he did miss a game after that, didn’t he? Just that it does happen.
"It's always good to have vikings."
Things I’d like to see soon:
Flash – Johansson – Knuble
Chimera – Laich – Fehr
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Idk, that Mackan line would have an odd speed combination. That being said, Flash would probably look good as a winger now and he has been willing to work down in the corners more this season than last.
The Laich line would be brilliant because all three of those guys are guys who bring alot of effort every night. Honestly, i’d want them to get more time then the 2nd.
Soon the Championship with be ours, all ours!
In many ways, the Chimera – Laich – Fehr line is more like a second line than a third line. Or should we say, more like a Caps style second line. Or like a Caps style second line of the last 2-3 years.
I recalled a time in 2008-2009 when the starting 3rd line for the Caps in Feb was the same group who had been the starting 2nd line earlier for that year.
Rocking the Red since 1975
What did bug me was a comment I read from Jeff Marek on Twitter – something along the lines of he’d rather see his superstar fight five times a year than block 5 shots a game.
That’s just a patently absurd comment by Marek, as if that’s a choice. I get what (I think) he’s saying – greater injury risk in blocking a ton of shots than in the occassional knuckle-chuckin’, but to phrase it that way is ridiculous.
Here’s a more fair set up – would you rather your superstar fight five times a year (5/33 of last year’s League-leading fight total) or block 0.4 shots per game (5/33 of last year’s League-leading blocked shot total). Give me the latter.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Nov 4, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m really disappointed that Sid didn’t say “dat shit ain’t right” in the post-game. Way to crush a girl’s dreams.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions
This morning, Sportsnet was showing a history of how many NHL fights Sid has been in and last night’s tilt was his 6th. I was amazed it was that many. That said, the only guy on there that my sleepy mind has retained was Keith Ballard. I am guessing most were of the Orr-King clutch and grab kind.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
skip to 25 seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wqR17KrLKw
Kid can really throw Down alright. Gutsy!
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
From Vogs:
This Date in Caps History – Longtime Caps radio play-by-play voice Ron Weber – who is slated to received the Foster Hewitt Award from the Hockey Hall of Fame this Monday – stopped by the press box before Wednesday’s game and displayed some of the archival material he has stored in his basement all these years.
One of those items was a day-by-day "This Date in Caps History" manifest, so we asked him to give us something we could share with you from this date: On Nov 3, 1984, Caps right wing Mike Gartner scored twice in his 400th career NHL game as Washington defeated the Devils, 6-4.
Oh Ted, please, please, PLEASE archive that stuff properly. We’re one bad short-circuit in household wiring away from losing it all forever. I don’t know what Weber has kept for all these years, but I am certain that it is invaluable and irreplaceable.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 8:42 AM EDT reply actions 10 recs
[Refresh… and it’s like it never happened.]
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
But we remember. Like Pepperidge Farm remembers. But we keep our mouths shut, for a price.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions
I still haven’t refreshed. I could take screenshots for blackmailing purposes.
"Do not be afraid to ask for credit, for our way of refusing is very polite."
by Laich It Or Lump It on Nov 4, 2010 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Hey, I really liked Vogs’s recap.
Here’s an odd bit of trivia. The reply window is precisely the size of the bit that I did want to excerpt. So if you accidentally copy the entire article instead of just that bit, you can’t tell…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
000
You mean the Caps existed before Ovechkin?

It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Slightly related (and forgive the rant in advance): that was the second game this year (the Bruins being the first) where I’ve known more about the opposition than the person talking the crap about Caps fans “only knowing Ovechkin.” Last night it was drunk Rangers yenta raised this question on the train home, and I asked her how the Wade Redden contract looked before I suggested she go straddle the third rail.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
000
No respect.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I know he's built like a linebacker...

Check out the NFL Equipment patch (wonder if he’s gonna get in trouble with Reebok for that)
"I would feed them lefts until I was pretty much tired of doing it." - Alan May, JRR, 10.16.2010
Why would he? NFL Equipment is a Reebok brand.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
If anything it means that RBK will now have a reason to produce even more NHL brand NFL merchandise.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Quick question: If last night were an indicator of what’s more to come this season, were you happy with the Caps’ play last night after the game?
Take no more than 30 seconds to answer this question. Just go with your gut — Yea or nay. There’s plenty of time to logically pick apart and dissect last night’s game.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
Yes. I really didn’t think they played that badly – there were some guys who looked a bit lost, and there were some rough moments but overall they outplayed the Leafs. It was a span of 3:03 where things went off the rails a bit. The power play looked better, the PK still looked good despite giving up a goal, the Caps’ goals were almost all scored by going to the net and they didn’t give up despite trailing twice.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
That span of 3:03 – appropriately called “a teamwide collective brainfart” by D’ohboy – almost cost us the game. That needs to never happen again.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Toronto-Washington games almost always go like this, though, so I wouldn’t make any definitive statements after a performance like that. Plus, I don’t think Neuvy lets a few of those in on normal occasions.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s never okay to let a team back into a game. It’s cocky, sloppy, lazy, and disrespectful to the effort required to win in professional sports.
Either play to win, or play for fun. But if you want the Cup, the fun should come from doing the right things to win, not by feeling “comfy” with a second period lead.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Wow. Kind of harsh, don’t you think? EVERY team does it occasionally, because the other team is there to win, too. Sometimes the other team scores, guys. It happens. It wasn’t a great effort all game but it certainly wasn’t their worst performance of the year (not by a long shot) and there was good stuff. Plus losing a two-goal lead isn’t exactly uncommon – there’s a reason it’s called the most dangerous lead in hockey. By the same token, do you think teams blowing two-goal leads to the Caps over the last two years (and there have been many) have been cocky and disrespectful toward the Caps? I’d say no.
Considering they’ve held much bigger leads this year, leads that have a much higher potential for cockiness/sloppiness/whatever to become a factor, and have not only not lost the lead but not surrendered another goal…I think we’re being WAY too harsh on them for doing it once. I don’t want it to become a habit, certainly, but one game out of twelve is hardly a habit.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I looked at the scoreboard when it was 3-1 and a lot of time remaining and the phrase “the most dangerous lead in hockey” ran through my mind.
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
Same. It’s a cliche for a reason, you know? BB spelled it out perfectly post-game – down by two, you get one and it becomes just a one-goal game with the momentum shifted in your favor. And when it happens fast like it did last night…sometimes that kind of thing just happens. I’m just fascinated by how many people are focusing on that one aspect instead of the fact that the Caps came back – twice – and ultimately won the game.
Hell, if you want to find negatives to point at there were plenty. Certainly wasn’t a perfect game. But I’m not panicking because they blew a two-goal lead to a team that always plays them tough.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Definitely had the same 2-goal lead “feeling”. When Nicky missed that open net on the 2 on 1 (which would have made it 4-1), I was afraid that might come back to bite us. Alas, 2 points in the end and hopefully some more lessons learned.
hehe – “monster” save
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Same. It’s a cliche for a reason, you know? BB spelled it out perfectly post-game – down by two, you get one and it becomes just a one-goal game with the momentum shifted in your favor. And when it happens fast like it did last night…sometimes that kind of thing just happens.
Yes, it’s a cliche for a reason. True. But, is it too much to expect BB + the Caps to be cognizant of that situation and respond accordingly? Momentum shifts and it shifts fast. The Leafs get one goal to bring them closer to tying the game. Two things the Caps can do here: 1) Woah, let’s double up, get back to our game and take that momentum back right away. 2) Buy into the whole dangerous 2 goal lead thing and shit happens. Oh well.
On the flip side, I’m just as fascinated by how many people are focusing on the fact that the Caps came back twice and won.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
I’m sure they were cognizant of it. I’m also sure no one was thinking “oh well, shit happens” when the Leafs made it 3-2. And I’m not saying they deserve a pass for blowing a lead but for crying out loud it was one…game. It was only two goals. That kind of thing happens no matter how cognizant you are that it’s a dangerous lead. By that logic, the Caps should never let any team score ever and should win every single game simply because they know letting teams score goals means there’s a chance the other team could win. It doesn’t work that way, there are 20 guys in another jersey who also have a say in how the game goes.
The reason I choose to focus more on the other stuff is because they’ve shown time and time again this year that they’re VERY aware of how quickly leads can disappear and have been great at shutting the other team down.
Guess what? Sometimes the other team scores goals. They really do, I promise it happens. And as long as this doesn’t become a habit and as long as the team is aware that it’s not acceptable on a regular basis (which it probably won’t and I’m fairly sure they are)…I refuse to look at this game and decide that, based on this one night, that all is lost and the team clearly sucks. Hyperbolic, sure, but that’s the tone I’m getting from a lot of you.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
by Becca H on Nov 4, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That kind of thing happens no matter how cognizant you are that it’s a dangerous lead.
That’s where I have a problem and am frustrated. Yeah it happens. I get that. But I think it’s fair to expect that part of being cognizant of the situation is to be proactive in response and execute. In every little way. Starting with BB. The leaders.
they’ve shown time and time again this year that they’re VERY aware of how quickly leads can disappear and have been great at shutting the other team down.
Time and time again against teams that are struggling (e.g. Calgary, New Jersey.) I’d like that time and time again to come against teams that aren’t struggling. That hasn’t happened yet, has it?
Guess what? Sometimes the other team scores goals. They really do, I promise it happens.
Shit, I wasn’t aware of that. I need a dummies guide to Ice Hockey. =]
I refuse to look at this game and decide that, based on this one night, that all is lost and the team clearly sucks.
Duly noted.
Hyperbolic, sure, but that’s the tone I’m getting from a lot of you.
I haven’t said all is lost and the team clearly sucks — hyperbolic or not, I’m not even suggesting that. Am I scared? Hell, no! … but I’m reeeaaasonably concerned.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
But I think it’s fair to expect that part of being cognizant of the situation is to be proactive in response and execute. In every little way. Starting with BB. The leaders.
And that’s where I take issue. It wasn’t like the Caps threw their sticks away, sat down on the ice and decided not to play. Momentum is a funny, unexplainable phenomenon and being cognizant of something and trying to stop it doesn’t always result in said thing being stopped.
Every hockey player, every coach knows about this dangerous two-goal lead thing – but I think it’s expecting too much of any hockey team to not blow at least one. And I think it’s irrational to get that upset when it happens in a game in which the Caps otherwise outplayed their opponent.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
And I think it’s irrational to get that upset when it happens in a game in which the Caps otherwise outplayed their opponent
I don’t think anyone here is throwing in the towel because of last night’s game. But I do think it’s reasonable to be frustrated, especially considering this conversation was in response to a question of “are you happy with last night as an indicator of the rest of the season”.
When you give up 3 goals in less than 5 minutes, it’s completely reasonable to not want that to be an indicator of play for the rest of the season.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
When you give up 3 goals in less than 5 minutes, it’s completely reasonable to not want that to be an indicator of play for the rest of the season.
I’d agree, and if we’re just going off the question that was asked…sure, I don’t want that to be the way the rest of the season goes. But to even ask it is to ignore the rest of the games they’ve played. It’s like they do something good and we’re all just waiting for the other shoe to drop; they do something bad, even when it’s something they’ve improved on, and we automatically think they’re reverting back to their old ways.
Even with the bad stuff this team is 8-4, they’re progressively getting better and they’ve fixed or are on the way to fixing some of the things that have plagued them in the past, same system/players or not.
I get that everyone’s uber-emotional right now and I get that waiting for a second (or third) chance at redemption is hard to do. But I think giving this team the benefit of the doubt, even just occasionally, would be a nice change. It’s frustrating for me, that’s all.
…and if you all didn’t scare me so much I’d write a post about how we all need to take a giant chill pill :P
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Even with the bad stuff this team is 8-4, they’re progressively getting better and they’ve fixed or are on the way to fixing some of the things that have plagued them in the past, same system/players or not.
I’d actually disagree with this statement – the team is beginning to play more like they did last year. They’re scoring more and the power play doesn’t look inept. On the other hand, the PK that looked so great to start the year is regressing hard to the mean and they’re back to their old unfocused ways once they get a lead.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
On the other hand, the PK that looked so great to start the year is regressing hard to the mean and they’re back to their old unfocused ways once they get a lead.
6 goals given up on the PK in 12 games, on 55 penalties? 90.87% is damn great, and you’re totally cherry picking 1 bad game to go from 90% pk, to get a 50% rate.
if you want to see if there’s a trend, throw out the outliers (take 3 out of 4, and 0 out of 6 games out) and what do you have? 3 goals on 45 and you’ve got an 85% pk rate, which rocks.
You know too much about stats to be arguing that the Caps are “regressing.” In groups of two games, the Caps have 3 groupings of 100% 2 at 90%, and one at 60%. In groups of 3 they are even better, and in groups of 4 they are 100%, 80%, & 80%.
Any real way you slice it, the PK is outstanding.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
by Boggles on Nov 4, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I had this whole reply written up for D’ohboy…and it disappeared. Strange. But yeah, I was thinking the same thing – and this is my point, we take one bad thing and suddenly it’s a major problem that’s reverberating through the entire season. One bad PK game against Boston followed by 3 goals allowed on 26 chances, and suddenly the PK (while still looking as aggressive as ever) is regressing again. One short stretch with one blown lead and suddenly they’ve lost their focus when leading, even though every other game where they’ve had a lead they’ve held it.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
If in a small sample like this, you’re willing to take out the games that don’t agree with your beliefs, you’re going to have nothing left.
You know too much about stats to be arguing that the Caps are "regressing."
The Caps PK was out of this world for the first six games. Since then, it’s been ok. There was no way that Neuvy’s PK Sv % was going to stay around .975. This is regression.
Any real way you slice it, the PK is outstanding.
No, it’s only that way if you slice it so that you eliminate the games where they sucked and ignore the fact that this team has had a crappy PK for years and that there is no way that Neuvy could sustain his PK Sv %.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
If in a small sample like this, you’re willing to take out the games that don’t agree with your beliefs, you’re going to have nothing left.
1. I didn’t throw out the games that don’t agree with me. I didn’t want to throw out ANY. I merely suggested that it would be more valid to throw out BOTH the best and worst.
2. Your argument hinges on eliminating 75% of “a small sample like this,”
3. And really, the only point that matters to me right now. You’re just too rude most of the time. Frankly, I consider you a very good thinker and highly knowledgeable about hockey, but it’s not worth wading thru the petulant, rhetorical garbage just to figure out where you have a point.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
First, I have a hard time going through this thread and finding where I’ve been the least bit rude to you, unless you consider disagreeing with your point to be rude.
Second, in a sample of 12 games, throwing out the outliers is a bad idea, because it’s not clear which games are the actual outliers. For example, a few weeks ago, our 7-2 pasting of NJ might have looked like a solid game; in hindsight it just looks like beating up on a weak team.
The Caps’ performance in the PK was unsustainably good, based primarily on Neuvy’s unreal PK Sv%. This is now regressing because it was unsustainably high. My argument doesn’t hinge on the eliminating anything. It hinges on the fact that the Caps started out the season at 100% for a long time and that there was no way that was going to continue. As Neuvy comes back to earth, the PK will regress. We’re watching that happen.
I like the improved PK system, but I realize that a lot of the Caps’ early success was lucky, and that they’ll have to improve their play if they want to sustain a PK % above 85. The team’s past PK performances carries a lot of weight in this, given that they’ve consistently had poor penalty killing in the time that Dean Evason’s been coaching the PK and there hasn’t been much of a change in PK personnel.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Rough estimate
The Caps have given up 6 PP goals on 55 chances this season.
Neuvirth has stopped 55/58 shots against on the PK—.948.
Varly has stopped 6/9—.667.
Give Neuvirth a more reasonable 51/58 = .879 and Varlamov 8/9 = .889 and that’s 8 goals against on the 55 chances, which is an 85.5% PK.
Obviously in one season you can have goalies swing wildly in any direction, but if the Caps’ PK keeps this up it seems they’ll be in good shape.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, out of curiosity, what do Neuvy’s numbers look like if you go back a couple games? I seem to remember him having a PK Sv% around .980 a couple games ago.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
After @Carolina: 40/41 = .976
@Minnesota: 44/46 = .957
@Calgary: 52/54 = .963
Toronto: 55/58 = .948
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Caps have had 58 shots against on the PK, Neuvirth has a .948 (unsustainable) SV% on them. If Neuvirth regresses to a more sustainable SV% of around .89, the Caps would have allowed 6 goals on the PK while Neuvirth was in net.
Normalizing for Varlamov, an .89 sv% against 9 shots, he should have stopped 2 of the 3 goals he allowed.
Thus, the Caps should have allowed 7 goals on 55 chances which is good for 87.2% PK which isn’t theoretically impossible, but exceedingly optimistic.
.89 is definitely high, but statistically speaking entirely possible for Varlamov or Neuvirth to accomplish with a better PK in front of them. You can regress it down to bottom of the pack at .88 and still come out to an 85.4% PK.
Yes, Neuvirth has hilariously unsustainable SV% on the PK now but for the time being the Capitals honestly seem to be an 85% kill team
also I took too long to type this, red army line is now my ENEMY
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
Again, as I pointed out above, I wasn’t saying that the Caps’ PK was getting bad, I was just saying that they were regressing.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
And getting it back was the hardest he fought for anything all year.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Why did he want it back so badly anyway? Didn’t it break?
I like Laich, but I <3 Green
by RockinRed4Life on Nov 4, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think it did, and players can be very superstitious about their sticks. I bet AO had a few internal thoughts along the lines of “I picked the wrong stick for that OT PP!”
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Oh okay, I thought it had snapped and that is why it flew so high
I like Laich, but I <3 Green
by RockinRed4Life on Nov 4, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Did you get my email about the JC jersey?
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
If it helps any, score effects were almost certainly in play, and the Leafs last season were a pretty good outshooting team with the score tied. They may not have tons of talent or depth for scoring, but they can still generate chances.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I looked at the scoreboard when it was 3-1 and a lot of time remaining and the phrase "the most dangerous lead in hockey" ran through my mind.
So what? It’s cliche like Becca says below, but that doesn’t mean it should be a free pass for the Leafs to take the lead eventually. If a fire starts, put it out immediately. If I’m thinking “2 goal lead and a lot of time remaining”, then I would expect the Caps’ to recognize that and respond appropriately to the inherent danger of that situation.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
It’s not a free pass, but it’s definitely a reality. Again, I direct you to not one but two 7-2 leads where at one point the Caps held a 2-goal lead – in those cases they shut the door and kept going. Last night they just weren’t able to do that. It happens.
And the funny thing is that just about every quote out of the players’ mouths last night referenced it as something they need to do – despite the fact that until last night they’ve been pretty good at it. Talk the talk, walk the walk, blah blah blah, but the fact is it’s happened exactly once all season and they’re already kicking themselves a bit (after getting a win, no less) for letting the Leafs back in just once.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
While I appreciate and agree with the sentiment, the two things to consider in this are that coming into last night, the Leafs were (point wise) 3 back of the Caps. It’s not like they’ve stunk entirely so far this year.
And second, I think this team has shown (for better or worse) that what they do in November means little in March.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
The Leafs certainly haven’t stunk entirely so far this year. No question about that. But, in response, going into last night’s game I’ll offer that one thing to consider was that the Leafs were playing the second tilt of back to back games.
As to the second thing to consider, I appreciate and agree with that. The thing is that this team is not exactly the same team as last year, or the year before, etc. That said, yes, generally what all teams show what they do in November means little in March.
Good points and for what it’s worth I asked my initial question in a deliberately simplistic and hypothetical way.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
Good points and for what it’s worth I asked my initial question in a deliberately simplistic and hypothetical way.
To suit a convenient argument, yes. ;)
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions
But the Leafs were on a losing streak and were on the second night of a back to back so they were too tired to fight us.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
And we’re still trotting Failskine as a defensive pairing (and two rookies in another), it goes either way. If they’re still blowing 2 goal leads at Christmas I’ll help folks wave the flag, but for whatever reason last night doesn’t really irk me.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
The second half of my comment was responding to the quote earlier this week about how nicely the schedule was lining up.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
well yes it is harsh, but it is in specific response to, “If last night were an indicator of what’s more to come this season…” Also, I was also asked to go w/ my gut and take no more than 30 seconds.
Fresh in my mind was the fact that in the BB era the Caps have blown leads in more than 60 games out of 237. Now, they win A LOT of those games anyway. But to have 1/4th of the total games encounter a situation where the Caps have to battle back after out-scoring opponents for large chunks of a game, then I feel my criticism has merit.
And I particularly feel entitled to my harshness as I have (and remain) very vocally optimistic about this team since my arrival on the site. IF yesterday, is indicative of things to come, than the Caps haven’t learned anything that they didn’t already know by the end of the 09 season. Meaning this team has the talent to win any game against any opponent. But that fact was established more than a season ago.
However, if the home opener and the 7-2 Calgary game are indicative of the future, than the Caps learned a very important lesson. And that is, Championship teams don’t get lazy with the lead, and every shift of every game it’s important to care about the job at hand and play responsibly.
Personally, I DON’T think yesterday was an example of things to come. I believe the New Jersey and Calgary games are the mark of the 10-11 Capitals. But I’m not going to ignore the continuation of an old pattern until the new and better habit of maintaining leads and shutting down trailing opponents is more firmly established.
My prediction: by the Winter Classic, opposing teams will NOT feel able to come back against the Capitals with a 3rd period lead.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
well yes it is harsh, but it is in specific response to, "If last night were an indicator of what’s more to come this season…" Also, I was also asked to go w/ my gut and take no more than 30 seconds.
Thank you for reading. That’s all I simply asked.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
Simplicity is overrated…:P But beyond that I don’t think it’s reasonable to take one game and try and use it as an indicator of anything except for that one game. A team can’t be judged by one game, so the question itself is flawed. I don’t judge this team by the 7-2 win over Calgary, either – I look at trends over the course of several games.
There are 82 of these bad boys – if you get too caught up in blowing a two-goal lead in one of them, and ignore the games where they haven’t done that (especially since there are more of the latter), it’s going to be a looooong year for you.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
A team can’t be judged by one game
How about all of those that have come before it (recent past seasons included) in which they’ve repeatedly shown a distinct lack of consistent killer instinct?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Nov 4, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Exactly. While this hasn’t REALLY been an issue yet this year (maybe because they haven’t had too many 2+ goal leads?), this has been an all too present problem with this team.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Look, I’m not going to sit here and say it hasn’t been a problem in the past, because I’m not stupid – I know this is an area they’ve been lacking in the last few years.
But a LOT of things have been a problem in the past, and at some point the past is just that – the past. You can’t dwell on one mistake they made this year just because it’s something they did a lot last year. For example, the penalty kill was an issue last year; so far this season they’ve really improved. So if they give up a PPG like they did last night should I then go into a panic spiral and assume all the good we’ve seen this year has been undone? Of course not. We wait and see if it becomes a trend.
If the Caps do this again next game, and then again a few games after, and then a game after that…yes, we have an issue. Believe it or not, teams that have this so-called "killer instinct" also occasionally blow leads – it’s only an issue if you let it become a habit.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
But to say that this year is different and that we should throw out the past two seasons ignores the fact that this is essentially the exact same group of players, exact same system and exact same coach.
Taking that into account, I think that’s where a lot of the frustration around here comes from in regards to this team. They’ve played, what, one complete game of three periods this season? Great, I love that we’re winning and getting points, but we did that last year.
I’ve seen no signs that this team is forming better habits so as to avoid another devastating playoff loss or get pushed to 7 games by a less talented team.
I’m not saying throw it out completely, and for sure there are issues that are still present from last year and the year before. But they’ve clearly taken strides to tackle at least some of them and it’s been evident on the ice – the PK, shutting teams down when taking a lead, allowing fewer shots on goal, etc. If it looks like they’re fixing these things, and they take one step back in one game, why do we not give them the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise?
We’re so cranky-pants frustrated around here that one bad thing happens and immediately it’s all “SHIT HERE WE GO AGAIN”. Ovie on a cracker, give this team a chance to show that last night was a fluke rather than a return to the “norm” of seasons past.
Related to your last comment…I still remember last season when the Caps went on their winning streak halfway through the year, there was a lot – and I mean a LOT – of hand-wringing about how the team has peaked too soon, this needed to come in April, etc. Guess what? It’s November. I’m seeing strides made, i’m seeing better habits and each set of games has looked better than the last.
There were a lot of problems last year; I admit that. They can’t fix them all in a day, and some will require outside personnel to be fixed. If they fix a few at a time – which they appear to be doing, and if you don’t see it you’re not watching the same games I am – and slowly ramp up to the playoffs, I’m fine.
And to further that point, look around the NHL right now. From what I’ve seen, ain’t no team playing all that many “full 60 minute games” – and you only have to ask their fans to confirm this.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
We’re so cranky-pants frustrated around here that one bad thing happens and immediately it’s all "SHIT HERE WE GO AGAIN".
Like I sort of said above, I don’t think anyone here is freaking out. No one here is saying they didn’t do anything right last night. It’s just frightening and frustrating to watch your team give up 3 unanswered goals.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
People were last night, and a few people seem angrier than I think they should be about it. Yeah, it’s frightening and frustrating to watch that happen – but it happens, we still got the win and it’s the first time they’ve really done that all season.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Fair enough, I wasn’t around last night. I was merely responding to today’s analysis, which I think has been very measured and even keeled.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I suppose most of it has been, yeah (except when I talk, is that the part you left out? :P) And the cranky-pants frustrated comment was more a read on how everyone’s been acting this season in general, not necessarily specific to this one game.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I was cranky last night, and I’m mostly gloomy this morning. Here’s why.
The team has the high end weapons that you need to dominate – AO, Green, Backstrom, Semin. They have decent goaltending. They have good roleplaying support – Knubs, Laich, Gordo, Chimera, etc.
They don’t dominate, though, because they have fatal flaws. Two of which (center and defense depth) we’ve beaten to death; they’re frustrating because they were so forseeable. Everyone knew they’d be problems, and they are, so it’s annoying to contemplate that the FO did this deliberately.
The third problem is, I think, a character problem, for lack of a better word. They come out flat in big games. They take their foot off the gas when they think the game is in hand. AO’s shift length – which I believe led directly to goal #2 last night – is a chronic problem. They play down to bad teams. They go through the motions for long stretches before turning it on at the end.
I don’t have all the whys and wherefores, but something Just Isn’t Right with this team. When I compare the Caps to, say, the Red Wings, they’re just not as professional or as thorough in their work.
Last night was an example of that. I don’t see it changing. And until it does the Caps will be the hockey equivalent of the Porche 914: flashy looking, but not a lot of substance under the hood.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
by fat_daddyo on Nov 4, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I don’t think anyone should say this team doesn’t have problems – they certainly do. But I don’t see a lot of what you’re seeing.
They don’t dominate? They actually have at times, but the League is more level than ever and even the “bad” teams aren’t really bad and dominating for entire games is hard. Thinking back to the Hawks last year, the Pens the year before, the Wings before that…pretty much every team that’s won since the lockout, really, none of them were going out there dominating from October to April. They had bad stretches and good, both within games and within the season. Hell, the Pens had to fight to get a top-4 seed the year they won (and fired their coach).
And what big games have they had so far? There are no “big” games in November – all of them are important points-wise, and you probably want to beat your division opponents, but beyond that…what implications were tied to these games?
AO’s shift length is a problem. It’s also one that’s been tweaked a bit in recent weeks – he’s still staying out for long stretches but he always has and it’ll take time for that to be fixed. As for the taking their foot off the gas…really? I’m saying this again, ONE GAME. The two times you could easily say games were “in hand” they not only shut down the other team but kept pressing for goal #8, #9, etc.
And maybe it’s not all there just yet. It’s also November. I’m seeing a lot of positives to go with the issues that, yes, are definitely there. You don’t win a Cup in November and you certainly don’t come out of the gate perfect and the epitome of a champion – and if you do, it’s unlikely you keep up the pace through to June.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
by Becca H on Nov 4, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Rec’d for perspective. The discussion about random games in November and what they mean for the team is what makes this place great, and I am glad everyone is so passionate about it. But, IMO, I’m seeing some pretty negative overreactions to the play of a team that is 8-4 and has shown some (if not entirely consistent) improvement on the major flaws in their game the past couple of years.
Everyone would like for the team to play better, or to acquire a stud C and D, etc., right now. But ultimately, the regular season means nothing as long as the team doesn’t completely blow it. The Caps could go 82-0 and it wouldn’t mean anything when it matters. They’ve shown progress on some of the issues that will matter in the playoffs, in my opinion (PK and team D), though they still have plenty of work to do in those and other areas. There is a lot of time left for the roster to be upgraded. And under the circumstances, I think the team is playing pretty well right now. We were very spoiled last year, yet we all know how much that fantastic regular season meant when the playoffs began.
Signs of improvement, just like signs of trouble, are there if you want to see them. But overall the team is playing well, has one of the best records in the conference, and has seen some key young players maturing and playing well. I see this glass as half full.
by grapejoos on Nov 4, 2010 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It’s just frightening and frustrating to watch your team give up 3 unanswered goals.
To a team that hasn’t been able to score in a brothel lately and that’s missing its best defenseman.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Highest paid =!= best. At best, Phaneuf is the second D I’d take off that team, and in some situations he may be the fourth (though probably not for the Caps).
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
I’m no huge Phaneuf fan, but I can’t think of the guy on that team I’d take over him. Kaberle? No. Komisarek? Decent, but one-dimensional. Beauchemin? I like him, but he’s not as dynamic offensively and he’s also got defensive issues at times.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Beauchemin is the easy choice. I’ll take him every day over Phaneuf. Phaneuf has the offensive dynamics, and he loves to throw that big hit, but he’s constantly taking himself out of the play to do it. On the Caps I would take Beuachemin and probably Komisarek over Phaneuf (though I want to see how Komisarek rebounds from this injury). On a team that needs offense from the blueline I might be tempted into taking Kaberle (and I hate Kaberle).
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Phaneuf, like Green, is still only 25. He has his defensive lapses, but so does Beauchemin. At their respective salary levels, I’d take Beauchemin in a heartbeat for the Caps, but if I were building my franchise from scratch, I’d take Phaneuf.
I think Phaneuf is overpaid and overrated, but I still don’t think that means he’s not the best defenseman on that team.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
I’ll stick with Beauchemin.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
FB would be my choice as well
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Beauchemin is also my choice. Phaneuf should perform better than Beauchemin, but he doesn’t. The talent is there at near-superstar levels, but his head isn’t nearly as developed as his physical skill.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
The talent is there at near-superstar levels, but his head isn’t nearly as developed as his physical skill.
The five year age difference is worth considering here.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Beauchemin is eating their tough minutes because no one else can. He’s a player and I’d absolutely take him before Dion Phaneuf, especially when you consider their contracts.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Weird to me how unhappy a lot of fans can seem with the method of a win in hockey. I rarely hear someone complain about how their football team didn’t play great all four quarters in a win, or how their baseball team gave up too many runs in the 5th inning in a successful outing, or damn their nba team sucked the first 3 minutes of the 2nd half. What is it about hockey?
I think they’ve made nice strides on the PK, which could actually be a big difference maker, and the goaltending is better because of Neuvirth. Other than that I haven’t seen a whole lot of improvement as far as forechecking, protecting the puck and making sure every man is marked.
It’s great that the Caps are tied for first in the conference but let’s not get carried away. We’ve played two teams that are in the top eight in points in either conference, Atlanta and Boston (and are a combined 1-3 against them). We’ve managed to win four overtime games, which is a little fluky. Not saying they don’t deserve the wins but I don’t buy that things have gotten any better overall.
With the PK there is a qualitatively observable difference. The system and approach is different. Will they still get scored on? Of course. But when they lose a 2 goal lead at home in the third period (and then go down a goal) because it appears they’ve taken their foot off the gas, well that hits a nerve to the people that were upset with the lack of killer instinct in years past.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
And I totally, completely get how it hits a nerve. I guess I would just understand focusing in on that one small section of that one game if it was a trend that we’d seen THIS year.
We just can’t seem to convince ourselves that anything has changed – not sure if it’s the pessimistic Caps fan in all of us, if last year’s heartbreaking loss was the final straw for everyone, if we’ve just all stopped being fans…I don’t know. But for some reason when good things happen we’re doubtful it will stick even when it’s a trend over several games, and when bad things happen we assume they’re back to their old ways even when it’s only happened once.
…but I’ve said this all before. Maybe we all need to go into some kind of grief support group or something, everyone sounds like they need a hug these days. And a nap.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I still think you’re over exaggerating people’s reactions to last night. Just because we’re critical of their performance doesn’t mean we’re all freaking out.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
And again I’d point out two things – one, I’m not directing this specifically at you, and two, I’m speaking more to the general tone that has permeated throughout this site since last spring. Just like with the Caps, I’m looking at issues as they occur over the course of many days…not just one.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I know you’re not directing it at me, and maybe last night people were shouting a different tune. But no where in today’s thread do I read “HOLY SHIT IT”S TIME TO PANIC" except in your interpretations of the discussion.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Not just last night, and not today, but all season long. And I’m not saying people are literally panicking (except for hyperbole’s sake to emphasize my point). Look back through the comments, though, on any post since the season started – if something bad happens, even just once, there’s a lot of “not again”s and “I just don’t see them changing”s and “same shit, new year”s. And when we see them improving things, it’s “wonder if they can keep this up” or “yeah, but let’s see them do it in April”.
Like I said, I get that when familiar stuff happens it hits a nerve that is particularly raw after the playoffs, and the instinct is to go negative at the first sign of anything that reminds us of that. I’m just saying we all need to take a collective breath, remember that the team is 8-4, that they’re doing good things, that they’ve got a long way to go until the postseason…and between now and then there will be PPGs allowed, leads blown, losses to lesser teams and games where lack of depth at D and C will show through. It happens.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
FWIW, I’d rather the team have leads and then blow them (a la 08-09) then fall behind and have to come back (a la 09-10), if I had to choose one of those two situations.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
…really? I wouldn’t. Neither sounds particularly appealing but I’d rather them be constantly reminded that wins take work than have them jump out early, float along and then blow it.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
“Blow” the lead as in have the game get tied (obviously if they lose all those games it’s a different matter). I’d rather have the team come out strong and have nothing to play for than have furious rallies at the end of the game.
If they’re coming out strong and leading, then they’re in control. If they are trailing and have to catch up, then the other team’s goalie has a pretty big say in whether they can or not.
Notice that I didn’t actually say the 08-09 team > 09-10 team (I’m undecided) but in terms of preference—weak starts to fall behind or weak finishes to give up the lead—I prefer the weak finishes, which seemed to me the trend in 08-09.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Notice that I didn’t actually say the 08-09 team > 09-10 team
(not that you read the comment like that, just wanted to make clear for everyone else)
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Last season, they began the year blowing leads, with most of their early season losses being ones where they had been leading at one point.
Rocking the Red since 1975
For me, 09-10 is a big blur prior to “the streak.”
by red army line on Nov 5, 2010 5:00 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess I would just understand focusing in on that one small section of that one game if it was a trend that we’d seen THIS year.
First, there has not been enough turnover in the roster or coaching staff to justify ignoring trends from years past.
Second, blowing multi goal 3rd period leads hasn’t been a big trend because the Caps haven’t been getting the same 3rd period leads as they did last year. Sure, they blew out two teams in crisis mode, but how about their other wins.
Against ATL they came from behind (then blew a late 1 goal lead before winning in OT).
NYI – Late goal to break a tie.
OTT – Lost a 1 goal lead in the 3rd and won in OT.
NASH – Had to erase a 2-0 deficit to win in OT.
CAR is really the only game they locked it down in the 3rd in a close game.
So I disagree that the rest of the season has shown that this team has overcome all of it’s problems protecting leads, particularly when you consider how the 60 minute effort is still very much a problem and the goaltending has made them look better than they deserve. You can say that last night was only one game, but that ignores the fact that the same problems have been seen in most of the other games, even if the outcome wasn’t there.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Yeah, and those blowout third periods did us a lot of good in the postseason, right? I said it earlier this year, these scrappy, close games are going to be beneficial down the line – and while they haven’t had a ton of chances to lock it down with a big lead, they HAVE done really well at keeping things close. It’s Neuvy, to some extent, but the defense in general (particularly when healthy) and the team as a whole has done a pretty good job of becoming more defensively sound – hence the lack of big blowout third periods.
And again, not saying ignore trends from the past – I’m saying you can’t use that as a reason to spazz out when one thing that used to happen all the time last year happens once this year. Improvement takes time, and as you’ve pointed out, there hasn’t been much roster turnover since last year – to expect them to cut out all the crap, or even some of it completely, in the course of 12 games is unrealistic. But it’s equally unrealistic to shut out the good just because they happen to take a step back now and then.
Are you really not seeing progress? Are you really not seeing a difference between opening night and now? There’s been one really bad game in the last 4, as opposed to 3 of the first 4 being bad. They’re still near the top of the conference despite that. And this whole “60 minute effort” thing is bullshit, in my opinion – the reality is most teams never find it consistently. You aim for 45 minutes of good and 15 minutes of not awful/not blowing the lead. The Caps aren’t quite there yet, I know it, but that’s a concern for later in the season and/or if they stop putting up points. Until then, they need to worry about making whatever tweaks they need to and that’s going to take time.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I think giving consistent efforts and doing the little things right with consistency will help in the playoffs a lot more than gritting out wins against sub-par teams because they play stretches of the game like they don’t give a shit, but that’s just me.
I see improvement from the first game. But I don’t see improvement from last year, and that’s what’s important to me. Sure, the PK has improved, but honestly that was very low on the list of things I thought needed to be improved for playoff success. There’s time, and that’s why I’m not spazzing out no matter how much you say it. But I’m not all rosy about an 8-4 record and getting all miffed when people are concerned about how the team is playing.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
First of all, I’m not rosy about an 8-4 record – I’m saying despite all this, despite the lackluster start they’re still picking up points. Considering we’ve yet to see what I think is the Caps at their best, picking up points in the meantime is pretty good. And I’m not annoyed (I hate the word ‘miffed’) that people are concerned about how they’re playing – read my recaps, do I sound like I’m thrilled with every little thing? I’m annoyed that certain bad things they do once are getting prime focus and the things they do well over and over get brushed aside. That’s ALL I’m saying.
And yes, consistency is important – but only when they’ve found their groove and worked out the kinks. What good is consistency now if you’re still figuring out your identity?
And it’s not just the PK. It’s the better commitment to defense and the return of the offense. They’re slowly making strides, and the stretches where they played like they didn’t give a shit were much more frequent in the first few games. Didn’t see it in Carolina. Didn’t see it in Calgary. Didn’t see it last night. To be honest I didn’t really even see it in Boston, I thought they played two fairly decent games against the Bruins.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Simplicity is overrated…:P But beyond that I don’t think it’s reasonable to take one game and try and use it as an indicator of anything except for that one game.
I wasn’t asking for reasonableness. There’s a plethora of that here, hence the simple question. I was just taking a pulse from an emotional, gut feeling, instinct perspective. I suppose that’s why there’s that Capitals Fan Confidence Poll to tally things.
There are 82 of these bad boys – if you get too caught up in blowing a two-goal lead in one of them, and ignore the games where they haven’t done that (especially since there are more of the latter), it’s going to be a looooong year for you.
A looooonong year of imbibing? Hmmmmm, that just might not be that bad. There’s a silver lining in that, no? Chiming in on your reply comment to SeattleCapsFan’s comment and J.P.‘s comment: In all seriousness, if we’re talking about the past in the larger sense of it’s definition, there’s an argument to be made about using last night’s game since that’s in the past. Fair? I think so. There are trends that occur during 60 minutes in the game itself. There are trends that occur within 2-3 games. There are trends that occur over a a couple of seasons or even more.
Getting back to the past game, that one trend I’m troubled with happens to be the duration of the game starting when the Leafs began their comeback and the Caps’ response or lack thereof to thwart them from taking the lead.
Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
My only issue with using the NJ and Calgary games as “the mark of the 10-11 Capitals” is that they were against teams that are notoriously struggling this year.
I still thing they’re working kinks out, and I think there were certain aspects of last night that made me happy (their PP being the first thing that comes to mind). Which is why Chris J’s question is such a tricky one, and my gut reaction wasn’t yes or no, it was “eeeeeeeeeh”.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
My only issue with using the NJ and Calgary games as "the mark of the 10-11 Capitals" is that they were against teams that are notoriously struggling this year.
And I think that’s why it’s going to be the trademark of the Caps this season. I think that the Caps are generally done with, “this is the easy one, we’ll just pick up two and get ready for Boston.” This season it’s all about executing the game plan devised by the coaching staff. BB says, “here’s what you do tonight.” team goes out and does it. Next day coach says, “Here’s where you listened. Here’s where you didn’t. Here’s what you do tonight.” And then the team goes out and does it.
If the Capitals can do that most nights, they are going to win 10-15 games of the 7-2 variety, because they are a very, very talented team, and as long as they let the coaches do the thinking, and the players just follow the strategy. Also, IF they do bear down on struggling teams instead of those 5 minute collective “brain farts” there are only going to be maybe 10 games with blown leads as opposed to 27 like last season.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
The Devils were NOT “notoriously struggling” when we faced them the first time. Calgary went undefeated in preseason and was doing okay until two or three games before the Caps came to town. The signs were there that they had some weaknesses, but they had Marty brodeur and Miikka Kiprusoff, two pretty good goalies.
Right?
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
We also faced the Devils on the second game of the season, so it’s sort of hard to be “notoriously struggling” at that point. At the time a 7-2 victory was pretty damn impressive. Now, looking back, not so much.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
They still had Parise and a fully-um…faced Volchenkov at the time however.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but Parise wasn’t doing much even when he was playing and now it’s come out that his knee was hurting since before the season started.
And the Caps didn’t pour it on until after Volchenkov got his “broken nose”.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
And the Capsdidn’tcouldn’t pour it on until after Volchenkov got his "broken nose".
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
C’mon. Those are never fair. 7-2 is a big win. It’s no more fair to say the Caps won 7-2 because they didn’t have to deal with Volchenkov, than it is to say that the Caps would have won 7-2 against toronto if Knuble pots that one 30 seconds into the game.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Was just typing that. Volchenkov was getting in the way (as evidenced by the current status of his face), but I’m pretty sure he wasn’t going to prevent that scoring frenzy all by his onesie.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think that was Knuble’s fault. I blame Flash. Nice fucking effort.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
I was up in the nosebleeds last night and I was watching Knuble and Laich fight along the boards and thought “Man, they look great, but why is it a two-man cycle?” and then I looked out and Flash was Just. Fucking. Standing. in the slot. More than once. Add that to the fact that his hand strength is so good a simple stick lift sends his twig into the stands and I almost popped a vein in my neck.
Eat, drink, and be merry! And then drink some more.
The Devils mishandle an injured American? Surely you jest? Thank fucking god it was this year and not last year.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
my answer was just getting long. I decided not to parse out “notoriously struggling” into “teams the Caps should beat” but that’s mostly what I’m talking about.
I think this year that Caps will be the team that weaker and/or struggling teams won’t want to face, because once they get a lead, they are going to put their skate on the throat of the opposition and win.
I also think that IF the Caps can win the games they should win, AND not let those teams back into contests when the Caps have a lead. Then the Caps are also going to get a handful of big wins over better teams, that will be forced to take chances to catch up to the Caps, and then the Washington Talent Pool can make opponents pay for making risky plays.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
Plus losing a two-goal lead isn’t exactly uncommon – there’s a reason it’s called the most dangerous lead in hockey.
Because there’s a long history of NHL announcers that have absolutely brutal math skills?
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
No, you see if you have a 2 goal lead and give up a goal you are only up by one and they have momentum, so it’s dangerous. If you only have a one goal lead and they score then you are still tied, so it’s okay.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah. Ron Wilson got interviewed after the game and he said “I’m really glad we stopped scoring when we got a 1 goal lead; getting that second goal would have been a kiss of death.”
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
We’re explaining why a 2 goal lead is worse than a 1 goal lead and that Ron Wilson had TOR stop scoring so they didn’t end up with the dreaded 2 goal lead last night. I thought it was clear.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Once again Flash came up with a brutal mental error to put the Caps in a tough spot by scoring that 3rd goal.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Sometimes when another team comes back it’s because they did a lot of stuff right. Not because the other team did a lot of stuff wrong.
Last night was a cast of the former with a little of the later.
Also, I firmly believe that if D.J. King wasn’t dressed the Caps would have won in regulation.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
I firmly believe that if D.J. King wasn’t dressed the Caps would have won in regulation
I’m with you on that 100%.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m really trying to figure out why BB even dresses him for all of 5 minutes of ice time.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
His hockey skills are severely lacking. I think he’s actually worse than Brashear.
Maybe if Semin gave him some stickhandling drills and he did that all day for a few months he could be a real player.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
But then you’d be teaching him to take some pretty frustrating offensive-zone stick infractions too.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Haha, I’m fine with that. It means he’ll actually be in the offensive zone and somewhere in the realm of where the puck is.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Seriously, his line gets pinned every time he’s on the ice.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Being a complete asshole, I love saying “I told you so,” and with King, I told you so. He’s not the right player for the Capitals this season (and especially not for this and next season). And while Della Rovere hasn’t been doing much in Peoria, I’d still much rather have him in the system.
I’m not sure why you’re telling me so. I’ve been against having an Enforcer forever. The most positive thing that I’ve ever said about King was that at 600K he doesn’t kill our cap so if GMGM thinks we need one it may as well be him. I stand by that. Is there really an enforcer that would be better to have? Look at how much those guys cost. Parros is possibly the only one that wouldn’t make me put my head through a wall if we traded King for him straight up.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Yeah, I have to say, I wasn’t totally against the move (and I still think moving Delly was fine) but I don’t think my reaction – or anyone’s, really – was that King was exactly what the doctor ordered, would be a perfect fit and would make us a contender.
I think a lot of us were hopeful that he would have more hockey upside than he’s ended up having, but also recognized that if he didn’t he was at worst a cheap option for a role the Caps would probably need filled sooner or later.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Do we know of any reason why GMGM didn’t first try and sign Konopka, so he wouldn’t lose SDR? Konopka can play some hockey. Oh well.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
The “you” wasn’t you so much as a lot of people who were excited by King’s arrival or defended McPhee’s acquisition of him.
I’d presume the feeling at the time was more rueing losing SDR and that for what King is, he’d do, but I’d certainly like to see quotes of excitement or defense.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
I’d take Rypien.
Ideally, the Caps would have a player like Evander Kane or Chris Stewart (who is just an absolute stud), who can play but also bring the beatdown when necessary.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Yeah, those guys are hockey players. I’d take Rypien too, but I don’t consider him an Enforcer.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Rypien could probably kick King’s ass though. Of course, he might tear a fan’s arm off and beat him to death with it. So there’s that.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Worth the risk.
The guy is Peter Schumpmaker. Lord knows what a schump is, but you can bet your bippy his ancestors made them. What he's doing is far worse than crafting fine schumps.
by Steckel Me Elmo on Nov 4, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
If you’d take Rypien, you’d love Jordin Tootoo. Twice the hockey player with equal agitation skills.
Not half the fighter though.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
I’ve never been particularly impressed with his fighting skills, but he’s probably got a slight edge in actual on-ice contributions.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
I’d say its more than slight. He’s always among the league leaders in penalty +/-, and is very solid defensively and on the forecheck.
Not sure how many times you’ve seen Jordin fight, but I think the fighting difference between him and Rypien is negligible at best. That’d be a whale of fight.
Tootoo looks to me like a guy who holds his own primarily by fighting non-fighters.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
The first two are cruiserweights, the other two aren’t really fighters. Lappy goes, but he’s only a step or two above Brads on the “face as punching bag” scale.
It’s all subjective anyhow. Personally, I’d rather have a few guys like Chimera/Hendricks and someone like Chris Stewart.
My man-crush on Chris Stewart knows no bounds.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Totally. :)
But really, you should check them out on Center Ice or Gamecenter. Fun team to watch.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Oh yeah, absolutely no disagreement with that. The Avs were impostors last year and I thought they’d regress pretty hard this year.
On the other hand, they’re not getting outshot to the same degree this year.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Also, it’s funny to hear his analysis of Liles, seeing as Liles has been on of the best defensemen in the league thus far, and not just offensively.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
That SC analysis on Liles was compiled by one of the guys at Copper’n’Blue, Gabe is just citing his numbers.
Dude watched all 41 games of the 1st half in like 5 days, and recorded chances. I’m in awe of his work ethic.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Watching hockey counts as work ethic?
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Watching 41 consecutive Avs games while recording chances then compiling the data? I can think of lots of other things I could do for free, especially when my time outside is as limited as it is in Edmonton.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
The watching is easy. The compiling is a bitch.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I just checked their fight cards and it looks like Rypien has higher quality fighters. Lots of Zach Stortini in there. Tootoo has Staubitz and Prust but after that it’s mostly real players and not actual enforcers.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Yep, and thats not an indictment on their respective fighting skills, but a product of Tootoo being a) smaller and b) Wade Belak. The Canucks rarely dressed Hordichuk, whereas there was a stretch where Nashville was dressing Belak almost every night.
At any rate, I’d prefer Tootoo because he’s a much better hockey player while providing similar agitation ability.
I don’t think size has much to do with it. Rypien isn’t a giant either. I can accept the Belak argument, though. I think I’d also probably concede that Tootoo is a better hockey player than Rypien, though I haven’t seen a whole ton of Rypien.
As a Preds fan, it’s got to really piss you off that Tootoo gets so much shit for the Coli hit but we didn’t hear a peep when Malkin boarded the shit out of Tootoo from behind.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
You’re not kidding. I was furious.
And even angrier that Engelland was essentially a 3rd man in on things when Malkin wimped out and wouldn’t answer the bell when Klein wanted to go.
Yeah, that’s where Klein should just start swinging. If that’s not the reason we allow fighting in hockey then I don’t know what is.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Said it before, I’ll say it again; AO gets a ton of flack for being a dirty player, but Malkin’s somehow escaped that reputation. I have no idea how.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Because he rarely throws hits. Which makes it worse. The percentage of AO’s dirty hits is far lower than Malkin’s. Then you consider the blatant ones Malkin has? Hits from behind on Mitchell, Tootoo, Semin (right?); a kick on Lecavalier (yes, a fucking kick); a horrible slew-foot on Mara (and I think there may have been a second slew-foot somewhere).
AO hits anything that moves, and sometimes it goes bad. I maintain that AO’s physicality is exactly the same as Dustin Brown’s. I love both players, but there are times when they throw hits that cross the line. That’s something you just have to learn to live with when you have a guy like that. It doesn’t mean you don’t punish them, but it’s part of the package. Malkin isn’t a physical player like that. He doesn’t try to hit or set the tone physically. When he decides to, he does it with cheap shit far more often.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
by Rob Parker on Nov 4, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yes. THANK you. I’ve been saying how dirty he is for the last two years – it’s why I dislike him so much, I just don’t respect him. I hate that he gets away with shit like that, hits that are seriously dangerous.
Like you said, the borderline stuff comes with the territory of the Ovechkins and Browns, but a) they get called for it and b) they throw tons of hits so the odds are some will cross the line. Malkin either wants to hurt people or never really learned how to hit the “right” way.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I defended the King acquisition primarily because I was tired of seeing teams goon it up with the Caps and the Caps responding by sending Brads out to get his ass kicked. Giving up SDR was a small price to pay.
Unfortunately, I was sold on the idea that King could actually play a little. He can’t. He’s terrible. With the emergence of Hendricks as someone who’s willing and able to go on occasion, I don’t really see the need for King anymore.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Me too, and to amplify, GMGM sold King as a tough guy that could play a responsible 4th line shift. Not a great player, but a guy that could bang, forecheck, cycle and give you a few minutes.
Maybe on a real grindey team that gets all 5 guys back into neutral and below the hashmarks on D, then lobs it into the corner and tries to reduce you to pulp in the corners for offense, he could play that roll. But on a possession based, puck pressuring and transition attack team, he’s just not able to keep up.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
I don’t even think King can handle that much. His play on Kulemin’s goal was just atrocious. He had the puck with a clear chance to chip the puck to center ice and he whiffed on it.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Was he trying to clear it? From my seats it looked like he was just trying to stick handle and skate it out of the zone. (Which makes it even worse)
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Either way, that puck’s gotta get out. Turnovers within 5-10 feet of the bluelines are killers.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Yeah. That was brutal. Ba-rutal. He got pwned by Kulemin. And prior to that, in that same sequence, he coughed up the puck on the opposite board, IIRC. I would not be surprised if he doesn’t dress for another 20 games.
And even if he does, he’s going to get Koci minutes against the Rags or the Flyers or their ilk. Three minutes in the first period, a fight with Boogard, and then he operates the door to the end of the bench.
Also, by “hashmarks” I meant “top of the circles” in my original reply to you, ftr.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
Unfortunately, I was sold on the idea that King could actually play a little. He can’t. He’s terrible.
Basically this. King’s been absolutely destroyed every time he steps on the ice. If he’s not going to dance with someone toot-fuckin’-sweet, he needs to stay on the bench or in the press box.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the theory might be that Orr would’ve had to pick a fight with someone else if DJ wasn’t there, but he really did stink out there.
When did this happen to the Caps last year? I don’t remember any of the Caps players (MB10) HAVING to get into a fight with a heavyweight just so they could bleed everywhere.
I was sort of interested with him coming on board with the talk about developing him more as a player but he looks worse than he did in preseason.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Its not like Hendricks couldn’t hold his own in a fight anyways. His hockey skillz are way better than King’s are.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
000
I would bet on this Hendricks in a fight

It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
she wouldn’t have to. I’d pull a Bradley. Hell, I’d pull a plane across the bottom of the ocean to stand in the way of any punches thrown at her. swoon
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
BOOM!
We're Hüsker Dü and we're on MTV. Who are you, and what are you on?
by bilspacecadet on Nov 4, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hendrick’s capabilities are in hindsight, though. At the time DJ came on board, there was no Hendricks, correct? Who knew that Hendricks could be all that a 4th liner could be and more! Love his enthusiasm.
by Ray of Sunshine on Nov 4, 2010 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions
yes, King was traded to the Caps in July. Hendricks was a non-roster invitee in September.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
True story, but King still could get scratched.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
Oh, for sure – much rather have Hendricks playing vs DJ.
by Ray of Sunshine on Nov 4, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Me too. I’m not sure why Hendricks was scratched. Bruce wanted to get Fehr back in. Maybe he wanted to give King another game. Then again, Semin was ill and was nearly scratched. If that had been the case, Hendricks would have been in.
If anything, Hendricks was probably an arbitrary scratch.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Or he had a shiner incurred in practice, as has been mentioned in the recap and this thread.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
......
The Caps in Pix link above shows Matt Hendricks in warmups. His black eye doesn’t look quite as bad as I thought I remembered seeing.
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
King was atrocious, but Brads wasn’t much better.
If this is DJ King’s best efforts, call me uninterested. I thought he was supposed to be able to play a little, but as someone else has said, he’s actually worse than Brashear thus far. Give me a fourth line of Hendricks/Gordo/Brads and I’ll take my chances with that.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Are you kidding me? I’d LOVE a fourth line of Hendricks/Gordo/Brads…assuming Gorgo is healthy and Brads leaves last night’s performance at home.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
This.
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Sometimes when another team comes back it’s because they did a lot of stuff right.
Riiiiiiiight, and the next thing you’re going to tell us is that sometimes when a hot goalie stops all the shots it’s because he’s actually playing really well.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
If that was the personal we were stuck with than yes, more or less. I won’t be happy with a game like that from the full team.
One thing I’ve really liked is how well they’ve played in OT. They almost finished the game before OT and a few times during. I’m liking how they don’t have any OT losses yet.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Especially given how bad we were 4 on 4 last year.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
perhaps a function of trying to be too cute with all that open ice?
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Ovechkin and his sticks...
Has someone played a joke on him and replaced his usual hockey sticks with longer ones? He seems to be stubbing and shanking a hell of a lot of shots lately, especially last night.
If you want to survive out here, you've got to know where your towel is.
Flash!
Did you see one of 14’s sticks cartwheel into the stands? At the next whistle, Fleischmann skated down and traded a stick he brought from the bench for the one the fan held. Shenanigans! He gave away Ovechkin’s hottest stick!
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
You could be on to something. Late in the game, Ovi skated back to the bench before a faceoff because of a broken stick. He took a long time before deciding which stick to take. Maybe it was because his sticks were switched??
Unless you go with him stalling for a breather, which makes more sense but is less provocative. : )
"I would feed them lefts until I was pretty much tired of doing it." - Alan May, JRR, 10.16.2010
And then he immediately shanked the first shot he took with that new stick and failed to keep the puck in the zone a few secs later. Shoulda gone with the other stick.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Nate had a tweet about this:
Thanks to the fan in Sec. 102 who returned Tomas Fleischmann’s stick last nite; he scored with that stick in the 2nd
"I would feed them lefts until I was pretty much tired of doing it." - Alan May, JRR, 10.16.2010
I saw the replay and still don’t think Flash ever touched it.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
How’d the stick end up in the stands? I was all the way up in the nosebleeds and it happened on the close side of the rink. I just saw some stick go up into the stands and figured there was a Rypien incident brewing.
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
Lift check. Guy flicked the stick right out of Flash’s hands.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s one hell of a lift
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
It was pretty amazing. I’ve never seen anything like that. The whole crowd started booing before they knew that Flash was just exchanging it and not just taking it back.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Yup, a bunch of us in 410 had to put one inconsiderate fan in his place. Seriously though, I think that every game they sell two seats directly behind us, to the most obnoxious, ignorant, talk-thru-the-game, think-they’re-auditioning for a play-by-play job, fans that can be found.
Country Gentlemen's Pig Fertilizer Gazette
Dunny-on-the-World
I had that in 433 — some junior announcer keeping us all up to date on what was happening. “The fourth line might be out there” “There’s a line change” “that was offsides”
Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest,
Did I look on great Orion sloping slowly to the West.
Oh mannn I hate that. Last year, I had some kid who would “oooo” and “ahhhh” at pretty much everything including simple passes and faceoffs and such in addition to his play by play. I don’t think even Locker and Joe talk that much.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
Is this "clutching",
or grabbing? (~25 seconds in): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wqR17KrLKw
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
The ice was very, very bad last night.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 9:26 AM EDT reply actions
People were falling down all over the place last night unintentionally. Gustavsson, and I think it was Semin in OT most egregiously. That shouldn’t happen to professional hockey players.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not gonna defend the ice, but Semin doesn’t need bad ice to flail around like a baby giraffe.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Part of the engima that is Semin is that he can be so graceful yet so clumsy, all in the same shift. Last night at the game I was admiring some of his stickhandling. It’s amazing how he can be surrounded by 3 players and still keep control of the puck and blow past them. I’m glad that Good Sasha has shown up this season for the most part.
I blame Wall’s excessive dougie dancing the night before.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I blame John Wall for the bad ice. Attracting all those fans to the arena the night before and having the game go into overtime. If they had just gotten blown out by 20 the building would have emptied an hour earlier.
Also the high heat and humidity yesterday couldn’t have helped…no, wait a minute.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
I blame John Wall. And his brother, Corn.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Well the Leafs were in town

I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
skip to 25 seconds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wqR17KrLKw
Yeah, the golden child can really throw down.
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
.

"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
At least he put a subject line on it….
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t get it. It’s been way colder in the building than it used to be.
"It's always good to have vikings."
Better blame Brooks Laich then..cuz y’know he’s sooooooooooooo hot!
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
…ha :P
Apparently it’s not just about the temperature, gf, because I thought the same thing – humidity is also a factor, as is whether the building is multi-purpose and stuff like that. I don’t completely understand it but there’s a reason a building like Edmonton, for example, has near-perfect ice – it’s cold and dry and Rexall is almost solely a hockey arena.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
The multi-purpose aspect definitely plays a role. Not just the Wizards, but TSN was also saying there was a horse show there last week and they had some troubles when re-laying the ice.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
There was indeed a horse show last week, I went (shut up, I got free tickets to our company’s suite) – it’s an annual thing, actually, every year there’s a road trip at the end of October for the horse show.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
and the ice the first week of November is almost always shitty as a result. There’s barely enough time between the end of the horse show and the first game for the ice to cure.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Specially when it goes horse show/BB game/hockey game. :(
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
tonight there’s some evangelical revival thingy (“An Evening with Dr. David Jeremiah”). Not holding out a whole lot of hope for great good ice on Friday.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Weren’t some people speculating it’s because of the heat from the Metro that runs direckely under the arena?
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Jonas Gustavsson
I am not a goalie expert so maybe others in here like D’Oh can offer their two cents. Do you see the TOR’s Jonas Gustavsson being an elite goalie in a few years? He definitely has the size, but he also has really strong positioning it seems. Any comments?
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
I also think he is getting some really excellent mentoring from J-S Giguere. I saw a shot on the coverage after the shootout and Giggy was talking/consoling him after the loss. He seems to have really taken him under his wing.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
The only thing I can really see derailing him are his heart issues. That has to be a concern.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Shannahan mentioned his cardiovascular problems also.
by mechanicsville on Nov 4, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I half expected to see Giggy in the last two minutes of the third last night.
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
D’oh is a goalie expert now? hahhaahahahahahaha.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
by zephyr on Nov 4, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
You’re just BEGGING for an argument now.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Nov 4, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Sybil?
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
by Bald Pollack on Nov 4, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Won’t be much of an argument if he’s debating goalies with zephyr.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions
An argument of goalies won’t be much debating if he’s with zephyr.
/I just thought it was funny. I’m no expert, I would have thought K_C would have been mentioned before the goalie hater =]
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Fair enough, just seemed like you were trying to provoke another argument.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Nov 4, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I am hate all goalies. All your nets are belong to me.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
by D'ohboy on Nov 4, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I guess I need to use more MS paint and sound more authoritative (though I would hardly consider myself an expert).
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Enough of an expert to get a couple by you…
(Complete luck of course.)
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
If It Ain't Staal Shooting, Gus50 Should Be Fine: A Quick Guide For Young Goalies
Exhibit A:
“Look At All That Net!” says D’ohboy

The Save. Because It’s Staal Shooting.

Rewind. Same Result. Zephyr’s Time Machine or Not, It’s Staal Shooting.

Exhibit B:
Look at All That Net! But Wait … That’s Not Staal! Gus50 Dice FML.

Zephyr’s Time Machine? Nah. Won’t Help Monster b/c It Ain’t Staal Shooting

Exhibit C:
Look at All That Net, Again! Oh Shit … It’s Not Staal! Kipper is Screwed.

Zephyr’s Time Machine Won’t Help Kipper Either, b/c It Ain’t Staal Shooting

Previously incarnated as UF and UnleashFurry...
Lost member of the now defunct 'Black Avatar Alliance'
by Christoph J on Nov 4, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
And this is why you go up top.
(And if you’re me, this is why you don’t score very often).
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
if you’re me, this is why you don’t score very often
I feel like I should turn this into something inappropriate…
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I just keep going up top, but all the fun stuff happens down low.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
When Lisa Hillary was having those quick fire 60 second hot seat question segments in…08-09?…I seem to recall Laich, on “top shelf or five hole?” say “five hole.” May be off on that, though.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Look at Flash on the MG52 goal.
He’s standing there like he’s trying to figure out how the hell he ended up in this career path.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
by fat_daddyo on Nov 4, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I’m looking at ThugLife’s goal and thinking “How the hell is the most dangerous defenseman in the entire NHL that freaking wide open that close to the net?!” I mean, geeeez, why didn’t they just give him an engraved invitation to waltz right in and score?
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Because TOR thought they had him isolated on the far side of the box until Sasha threw some unreal sauce across the ice.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
I can’t say enough about how amazing that tying goal Semin scored was. Unbelievable.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep. Flash actually pulled the two D that are visible towards him when he went to the slot, and Semin no-looked that bad boy with a lot of zip on it. It takes seriously talented hands to receive that pass, I’ll add.
Patron saint of quality footwear.
You basically tell from the stills that the goalies (other than Neuvy) had no time to react and never identified the shot.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Disagree on the Green goal. Monster got over but he went down way too soon and let his glove hand drop. He basically gave Green that goal.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Oh, I forgot that was from last nights game. That was the one where Green held the puck for a year and then sniped it, right?
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
Yeah. It seemed like slow-mo.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Green’s ability to just slow everything down on those plays is uncanny. It’s like some game of chicken that he always manages to win.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
something I rarely see him get credit for outside of these friendly confines. There aren’t a lot of other guys that can do that.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
He made one move last night that was incredible. He came into the Of zone, put on the breaks and pulled the puck back while the defender kept skating to the goalie. Unreal timing.
The way he jukes 3 guys as a one man breakout never gets old to me either. If I could pick one guy to skate as it would be Green.
Think twice before you speak, and then you may be able to say something more insulting than if you spoke right out at once.
That and the shooters were in much better position to get some mustard on the puck. Staal was further away and the pass was in front of him making it tougher to roof it before the goalie could get over.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not a goalie expert so maybe others in here like D’Oh can offer their two cents.
Paging Theo60…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
By the way, nearly lost in “Sid Fought” discussion from last night was Loui Eriksson’s beast of a penalty shot.
by Wheeler on Nov 4, 2010 10:38 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Love those slow dekes.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Beautiful, regardless of the fact that in no way should that have been a penalty shot.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, and the Stars’ announcers at least recognized that last night.
Thank God that Center Ice has both the Home and Away feeds. Listening to Steigerwald and Errey is like eating glass.
I really like the Dallas guys – even if I didn’t, though, I would have chosen them over Steigerwald and Errey. Those guys are absolutely awful. I even wrote some silly “play” featuring them and Crosby for a preview on my old site a few years ago…
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I think I vaguely remember that, as a matter of fact.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
DAL's colour guy Darryl Reaugh- B-Mo's brother in law and Stars snuggie wearer

I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
You don’t need a snuggie if you live in Dallas.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Good lord that was beautiful. “full frontal lobotomy” is right.
"Do you see my fist? It was fists like these that built quaint Canadian cities out of the harsh Canadian wilderness, etc. etc."
Not in Seattle anymore.
by SeattleCapsFan on Nov 4, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Opinions
For those watching the TSN coverage (not sure if locals had some other coverage) what were your thoughts on the play by play and color guys last night? I will reserve my opinion as not to lead the discussion but I caught the second half of the game so I never caught the names of the anouncers but wanted to know what others thought.
Forget about finding your perfect match, I want a website where you can find your perfect arch-nemesis
Living in Toronto, I have dealt with TSN’s hockey coverage for years. They have two teams: Gord Miller and Pierre McGuire who usually do Eastern conference games and Chris Cuthbert and Ray Ferraro who do Western Conference games.
Many people look at Pierre McGuire and jump on the guy immediately. I can see why at times: He can be loud and overbearing when doing colour. He can be sanctimonious. And he often second guesses the coaches and refs to an annoying degree. All that said, I don’t dislike him as much as some do. He has knowledge about the game and when in studio for TSN and restrained he is actually bearable. And the man does love the game. No doubt about that. Gord Miller has done play by play for years and is good, not great. Fun fact — when TSN first had NHL coverage in the early 90s, their team was Gord Miller and ex Caps coach Gary Green.
Chris Cuthbert is a good play by play guy. He used to do the late games on HNIC for years. he is very solid—not Jim Hughson good—but solid. Ray Ferraro for colour guy is very hit and miss. Sometimes he has a good observation, many times he says really silly things. He lends a lot of personal observations that end up nowhere. He doesn’t add much when in studio.
The TSN round table I think is the best one for between period discussion. James Duthie is a good host. Bob McK is great as always. I like Craig McTavish quite a bit and he has some great ex-coach/ex-player observations. The other guys usually rotate between the good (ex Flames coach John Anderson), the fair (Darren Pang), the meh (Mike Peca) and the downright shite (Matthew Barnaby). And Darren Dreger and Dave Hodge have good segments and insights.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
All that said, I don’t dislike him as much as some do. He has knowledge about the game and when in studio for TSN and restrained he is actually bearable.
I don’t know what happens to that guy when he gets in the rink. I like him a lot on his XM spots, but he constantly says annoying and stupid stuff during broadcasts. Last night at the start of OT he claimed that AO wasn’t starting the OT because BB wanted to keep him away from Schenn, when the much more obvious explanation was that AO played the last minute of regulation. Then on an intentional offside in OT he kept repeating that it was an icing and AO never touched the puck, when it clearly looked like AO got there first. He is just so obnoxious as a color analyst.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d still take him over Milbury any day.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Oh easily. Pierre Maguire at least has moments when you know that he has a functional brain.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
If Holtby’s not getting into a game this weekend, which seems to be the prevailing opinion, wouldn’t it make some sense to send him to Hershey to get a game in? Does it matter who’s sitting on the Caps’ bench if it isn’t Varlamov?
"It's always good to have vikings."
The only challenge, and it’s minor, is Hershey’s schedule – Hershey plays Sunday and Tuesday in Charlotte.
That Poti article was a fitting reminder of how much suffering he endured after that Game 6 and during the off-season, now that 2010-11 is in full swing. What unbelievable terror.
For levity, though, when I first read:
“Poti also has food allergies, which, while serious, are easier for him to manage. Chocolate, fish, MSG and nuts can send Poti into anaphylactic shock.”
I thought “Madison Square Garden.”
I thought "Madison Square Garden."
Scotty Hockey would agree to that assessment.
"I would feed them lefts until I was pretty much tired of doing it." - Alan May, JRR, 10.16.2010
even SI has drunk (insanely large quantities, apparently) the Brooks Laich kool aid:
Brooks Laich nominated for Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
I can’t wait for this argument again.
If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak.
by Hang a Laingtern on Your Problems on Nov 4, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Nah, no kool aid involved here – he’s not saying he’s the Bestest NHLer EVER, Sportsman of the Year is one of those “awards” that is more a recognition of something beyond athletic performance, no? Completely cheesy and meaningless, but yay for Brooks anyway :)
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
yay for Brooks, but I imagine he must be sick of talking about the tire story at this point. Hell, I love the guy and I’m sick of hearing about it!
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
it’s probably going to Halladay, or the Bama QB.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Went to a baseball player last year. I’m voting an NBA player.
LOL…a hockey player hasn’t won the award by himself since Gretzky in 82.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
no NBA player up this year. The list is
Halladay (MLB)
Laich (NHL)
Butler Men’s Basketball tea (NCAA)
Lorena Ochoa (LPGA)
Greg McElroy (NCAA)<— the Bama QB
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
It’s certainly going to grow beyond that list of 5.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I think last year there were at least 30.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
unfortunately I can’t located last year’s nominees on SI’s website, but I’m pretty sure they only have a handful on nominees each year.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
I think the dropdown box of essays is here.
"DON'T SAY THAT! Please! That is the worst, most stupid thing anyone could say! Cause it quite clearly isn't "only a game." I mean if it was do you honestly think I'd care this much?"
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
I hate that article so much for how it ends
Laich was a gentleman. This is something of which we never tire.
BLECH.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep. I wanted to punch some faces after I read that.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Nov 4, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
You mean it’s a…retread?
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
by Becca H on Nov 4, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Ooo, that was slick, Becca
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I thought the last line fell a little flat.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Nov 4, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Really?
I thought it was groovy.
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
by redlineblue on Nov 4, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nah. I"m not jacked about it.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
by dcsportsfan1 on Nov 4, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No qualms about the nomination though—Laich had a pretty goodyear in that sense.
There's no 'i' in "team". But there's a 'nap' in "champion".
by redlineblue on Nov 4, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Now if only his rubber could find the net a little bit more often….
I don’t have much tolerance for stupid. Or cheese on food that doesn’t need it. -duck
by twistedlogic on Nov 4, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Farber apparently never met a pun he didn’t like, either.
"Now wait a minute. This is just purely a social call. You know, just two adults getting a stew on, man."
by The Ghost of Bebop on Nov 4, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
If it’s Farber writing, shouldn’t he have been commenting on Brooksie’s “hockey haunches” as he stooped down to change the tire?
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
I’d be happy to comment of his hockey haunches. they’re a sight to behold.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
injury updates from CI:
Poti’s groin has apparently completely fallen off, because he’s not going to play anytime soon.
Hip flexor injuries are apparently contagious, because that’s what Sloan is dealing with.
Sloan will likely play tomorrow, Johansson might. Or might now. You think Bruce is going to give a straight answer?
Sounds like Varly is still a ways off if Bruce is saying Holtby will be getting a game, but not this weekend.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
At the risk of getting banned, I need to ask the dumb question of the day. On the NHL Network recap of the game last night, they gave Ovie the GWG. But every other source seems to credit Semin with the game winner. Who is right?
I may be wrong, but I don’t think GWGs are awarded on shootout goals.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Semin got the game tying goal in regulation. Ovi’s shootout goal was technically the winner since the Leafs didn’t score in the shootout. Do they really award GWG’s for shootouts?
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
It’s on the Caps stats page as a GWG for Ovi. But, Semin’s SO goal clinched it as such; if he had not made it, then Toronto would have had another chance to tie with Ovi’s goal, then on to another round if they had made it.
But he did make it, and Neuvy had save the previous two. Its the equivalent of a guy scoring the 4th of 5 goals in a 5-3 win. He gets the GWG. If the goalie lets in a cheezer with a minute left and they win 5-4, the GWG goes to the guy who scored the 5th goal. All the more reason why GWG stats are pretty bogus.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
Oh, I agree. I think the awarding of the GWG on a SO should better represent the criticality of the goal. I think it should be who shoots and scores last, and that depends on which team shoots first.
Last night with the Caps shooting first, Semin’s goal was necessary to determining the outcome due to the required 3 rounds. We don’t know if Toronto’s 3rd shooter would have scored or not, but Semin had to score to keep them out of it for good. This is true whether or not one of Ovi or Backstrom scores first and the first 2 Maple Leafs miss: to end it the Caps 3rd shooter must score, and the 3rd Maple Leafs shooter becomes irrelevant. Once the 3 rounds ends, it’s a one-on-one situation
If Toronto had shot first and the results had been the same plus their 3rd shooter had missed, then Semin never has to shoot and Ovi’s is the only SO goal. If their 3rd shooter scores, then Semin must shoot.
If Backstrom and Ovi had scored, and the first 2 Maple Leafs missed, then Backstrom would have been awarded the GWG? If the SO had gone beyond the required 3 rounds then whoever got the last goal would be the game winner, right?
Is the Fenwick/Corsi from last night not working for anyone else? (if it’s working for you, would you mind sending it to me as an HTML or something?)
Ah, game ID was listed in the hyperlink with an extra zero. Wow, I feel silly.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
For those attending the Winter Classic, you may want to come strapped.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
interestingly enough, PA is a concealed carry state, but “weapons” are not allowed in Heinz Field, so if you had a permit in PA or one recognized by PA you could carry to the game, but would have to leave it in the car, which if the police aren’t working the game kinda defeats the point of it.
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
Rick Berry is only 32? Why do I feel like he should be a lot older? It feels like he played here a thousand years ago.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 1:49 PM EDT reply actions
No kidding. When he made all those underhanded free throws for Golden State when they beat the Bullets in the Finals in the early 70’s he must have been really really young.
Just trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
That Rick Barry (from what i’ve read) seems like he’s a colossal prick.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
At least that NBA Rick Barry is still alive. The other isn’t.
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
If it makes you feel any better, Stephen Peat is still—still!—only 30.
Who’s the last Capital on the team that was older than you? Mine was Bondra.
We're Hüsker Dü and we're on MTV. Who are you, and what are you on?
by bilspacecadet on Nov 4, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I just turned 27, so there’s still some guys older than me on there. Knuble, Poti, and Erskine are the only ones older than me I can think of off the top of my head.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Bradley, Chimera, and Steckel are all older. Laich might have you beat by a couple of months.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Yeah. Brooks is up on me by two monfs. I’m older than Gordo by a monf.
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Am pretty sure Gabby’s older than I am.
by mechanicsville on Nov 4, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
And looking at your NHL leaderboard for today, guess who leads the NHL in goals and points scored by a defenseman?
Dustin Frickin’ Byfuglien.
That man has been a beast since Atlanta moved him back there.
If we had him, I’d replace Knuble with him.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 4, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
From what I remember, it was Nylander for Byfuglien and Sopel. Chicago’s GM agreed to it, but it was nixed by their owner. That trade could have changed everything.
I could be wrong. But I know they were trying to dump Khabibulin at the same time which is why I thought he was involved in that trade.
My how things would have been different. Byfuglien, a man who can give good offense and good defense and is actually good at them both, unlike a certain defenseman we have who occasionally filled in at forward when we were desperate.
Rocking the Red since 1975
But he’s a wingaaaaaaaar!
(no, really, he actually is)
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 4, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
BB on Neuvirth:
You know what, we’ve asked a lot from him this year. We’ve played 12 games and he’s played in 11 of them and if you look he’s never played more than 45, 50 games, including playoffs in his pro career.
False. Neuvirth has played exactly 57 games in each of his pro seasons (regular season and playoffs).
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Wow….
Boston’s goal differential is +16.
New Jersey’s is -20. Buffalo’s is -11. Neither of those teams have won a home game yet (only two teams in the league that haven’t)
It takes a special kind of man to be a Scuttlin' Crab Man
Box Seats Blog
Ron and Fez 11 to 3
by YvonLabresMoustache on Nov 4, 2010 3:22 PM EDT reply actions
Boston really needs to stop that – they’re making me sound like an idiot, and I hardly need their help to do that.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I told everyone that I could two things about the upcoming season:
a) Boston was the clear choice to win the Northeast, and had a good shot to place first in the Eastern Conference; they’d significantly improved their offense, which had seriously underperformed the previous year, without hurting their defense too badly, and they probably had one of the best goaltending tandems in the NHL;
b) Boston would be stupid to trade Tim Thomas because, let’s face it, he wasn’t that bad last year and there was a significant likelihood of a Tukkaa Rask sophomore slump.
Once the SBN search function is working again, I’ll post links to show “I told you so.” :P
I think many of us agreed with you. :)
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
Here you go

I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 4, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Don’t need to, because I remember those conversations. :P
HOWEVER, sir…let’s not go congratulating ourselves yet, because the season’s not even close to being over and the Division/Conference titles won’t be handed out for another 70 games or so. Also, Boston’s played 9 games. Small sample size + early in the season = too soon to tell. Also, Montreal’s had a pretty good start, as well, and if they can get their PP working will be challenging Boston for that crown. They’ll have to, the rest of that division is littered with sad sack teams.
I still don’t buy their offense being that improved, despite early returns, because I don’t think that they can maintain their current pace. I also think you must have amnesia because Thomas WAS bad last year – and they won’t trade him because a) his contract sucks so no one will take him and b) Rask probably will have a sophomore slump year, the only thing I really agree with you on.
All that being said, I’m fully prepared to (unhappily) eat crow at the end of the year if I’m wrong – not that I mind being wrong (I’m used to it) but because it would mean Boston would be good and I’d have to move to another universe. Blech.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Going strictly by the numbers, Thomas wasn’t bad at all last season, he just wasn’t Rask. Also, Rask got a ton more goal support than Thomas did, which isn’t something either of them has any control over.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
2.56 and .915. Better than the Caps got. Obviously the D systems influence that, but there’s no D system that’s good enough to make .915 look flat out bad. He just wasn’t the Vezina guy he was the year before and Rask made it look worse.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Going strictly by the numbers, no, not bad. Judging by the types of goals he was letting in, though? Not good. The OT goal he gave up to Semin was just the tip of the craptastic iceberg.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
And the cherry-picking award goes to…
BECCA H!!!!!
/cue the music
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Haha. I miss the easy point.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Smooth move, Esa.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
by Becca H on Nov 4, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
So it was. Whatever, he gave up some AWFUL goals last year, that just proves he was showing signs of still being Tim Thomas and not creepy pod person Vezina-winner Tim Thomas.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
What? The bad goal example you cited was from the Vezina year. Even Vezina goalies let in bad goals.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
I left out a word there – that should read “that just proves that even then he was showing signs…”
You know, as someone who has pretty strong (and vocal) hatred for other players I don’t get why you insist on trying to break down mine for Thomas.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I hate Thomas. I don’t begrudge that at all. The guy is a giant dickhead, but credit where it’s due. He didn’t suck last year.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Exactly. Crosby, Malkin, Pronger, and Richards are all totally hateable, but you have to acknowledge that they’re really, really good at hockey.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
They are good at hockey, and I acknowledge that on a regular basis. I try not to let whether I hate a guy influence me THAT much – I don’t acknowledge that with Thomas, though, because I’ve seen him let in enough crappy goals over the years to know he’s just not that good.
He had a good year when he won the Vezina. He played well against the Caps a few weeks ago. And…that’s all I’ll give him. Sorry.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
But you will continue to go to bat for Theo. Makes perfect sense. If you are condemning a goalie because you’ve seen “enough crappy goals over the years” then you should have Theo rolling under that same bus. But you won’t.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
You can be as snarky with me as you want, it’s not changing my mind. And yes, Theo’s had some rough outings – but the reason I go to bat for Theo more often is because, for every crappy goal he’s given up over the years, I’ve seen 3-4 times as many great saves.
I watched him drag at least 3 different teams (2 in Montreal and 1 in Colorado) into the playoffs and give them victories they wouldn’t have gotten without him. Thomas had one good year and a few good games; Theo’s had a lot more than that.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
Sheesh. I’m sure Tim Thomas got a Vezina and a .915 by not making several more great saves than stinkers.
Thomas is ugly and a Bruin.
Theo is hot and a Hab.
Lockout talk makes me want to go out and choke an old lady - Elliotte Friedman
Thomas had one good year and a few good games
I count three good years, minimum. For Theo, I think I count one. (for both, since the lockout)
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s a product of playing like Hasek-lite. He’s going to give up some howlers, but he also gets a lot of pucks than he has any business saving. This year, there have been a lot more sparkling stops than howlers. That’ll regress somewhat, but Tim Thomas is a really good goalie.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions
If you subscribe to the whole “you need at least four years of data to properly judge a goalie” thing, well, Thomas I believe is 2nd since the lockout in ESsv% to Vokoun.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions
That whole team sucked last year. Just because he was playing behind a defensive system that could make the 1995 Devils look free-wheeling – and out of sheer necessity, btw, because they couldn’t score to save their lives – doesn’t mean he was good. In fact behind that system I’m surprised he even got up to a 2.65. The team GAA was 2.43.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
No, they didn’t suck; they were bad at shooting, but phenomenal at possession and got phenomenal goaltending from Rask. I’d have been overjoyed with a .916 season from Theo last year. If Cooke hadn’t scrambled Savard’s brains and Richards hadn’t injured Krecji, I really believe the Bruins would have been the EC champs if everything else had broken right. They had some rotten luck in the offensive zone, which changed when they got to the playoffs and were healthy.
This year, they’re getting lucky on shooting and goaltending, a lot like ‘08. They’re still a really good team, even if they’re not as good as their current record. Thomas won’t keep this up, but the Bruins, as a whole, are definitely playing better than the other EC contendah’s this season.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I know the real reason you hate Thomas. It’s because he’s a Bruin and you secretly love the Habs best. Sleeper agent!
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
You’re not that far off, actually – I’m not a sleeper agent :P but it’s definitely where the hatred started. Related, I hate Patrice Bergeron to this day.
He, however, IS a good hockey player and I’d love to have him here.
If anyone needs me, I'll be at Kettler.
I hate Patrice Bergeron to this day.
Then I can listen to nothing more you say. Patrice Bergeron is a classy and wonderful player. He’s the type of player the NHL needs more of. Hate the Sean Averys and Steve Downies of the world, but leave the Patrice Bergerons out of this.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
by D'ohboy on Nov 4, 2010 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
He played enough games that I think I can assume he evened out those bummers with beauties.
by red army line on Nov 4, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I voted for Boston in the FanPost about #1 seed in the East.
/pay no attention to my reference to Rask in my comment
"Hockey is my life, wine is my passion." -- Igor Larionov
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 4, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Buffalo is making me look good so far for predicting that they’d miss the playoffs.
Release the Mackan!
by Killer_Carlson on Nov 4, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
New Fan Post
Listen to the radio in the car. Get intrigued by what you hear. Find time to write during the day, and . . . Voila!
Life With Spidey -- a blog about sports, travel, work, family and fun.
Representing Caps fandom in the Gateway to the West.
Swiped from Puck Daddy’s afternoon headlines, the 23 Best Players Making Less Than $1 million. Neuvy and Carlson check in at 18 and 19, while for Caps B.Mo, Johnny, and Eric Belanger also make appearances.
my inner Gordo fangirl is crushed that he didn’t make the list.
Pledge Drive 2010-2011: SO KIDS CAN!! Help build a playground
Hmmm.
South carolina Stingrays announce they’ve brought up a goalie.
That means that Todd Ford is staying in Hershey, which means that Holtby is staying in DC.
For now.
@SCStingrays Breaking News: Goaltender Connelly Returns to Stingrays
You perhaps knew me better as "Your Nation's Capital." Same great commentary, now with 100% more transparency!
Corey has an interesting article about Semin. I know that some people thought he didn’t seem to care about the way the playoffs went last year but according to his agent he did:
"He was just absolutely empty," Semin’s agent, Mark Gandler said. "It was just a time when you have no clue what happened. Having had so many opportunities and carrying the play in almost every game other than maybe one and losing the series was extremely hard for him to take. He’s been pretty good the last three years. The only blemish was so many shots on goal and no goals in the playoffs last year. That was just very difficult to swallow. This year he is just more determined to have it happen. What can you do? You can’t sit and wait to do it in the playoffs. You have to earn the right to be in that position and hopefully be healthy to give it another go."
Brooks on Semin:
"I’ve said it to some of our other players and some of staff members. He seems to be competing every night, which is something that maybe he could be accused of not doing in the past," Brooks Laich said. "Even if he doesn’t score every night, he’s been winning stick battles and winning puck battles. He’s backchecking and getting pucks out of our zone. I think his two-way play has come to a new level. That’s good and hopefully it continues. Everyone knows about his offense but he has a lot of other underrated skills that people don’t always see."
Knuble on Semin:
"He’s got more talent in his pinky than anybody," Mike Knuble said. "It is striking to other players sometimes to see just how much raw talent he actually has. He’s a very, very talented player. When you come here you know he’s a really good player but the thing that strikes you is he’s way bigger and heavier than I thought. You’d think he’s a little skinny kid almost, but he’s not. He’s a big dude with big hands. There’s no doubting his talent. It’s pretty scary. You shake your head and you’re like, ‘Oh my God.’ It is fun to watch.
“I know nothing," Knuble said. "I don’t know if he’s like a funny guy in Russian or a smart guy. I’ve asked the other Russians, ‘Is he a funny guy or a smart guy or a shy guy?’ I don’t know. I just don’t know. He’s a gamebreaker though. He can save games. He’s one of those main guys that can do that. He flies under the radar and people might think he’s hard to read, but look at last night – he wasn’t feeling well but guys in the room loved the effort."
opps sorry, I see there is a post up on this article. That’s what I get for not going back to the main page all day long.
Still thanks for posting it. It was a good read regardless.
And I hear you talk the talk, but I don't see you walk the walk and I still don't believe a thing you say.
by D'ohboy on Nov 4, 2010 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
JLikens piece on score effects and minor penalties
The data’s pretty clear about score effects and Fenwick; teams that are trailing tend to take more shots from further out, teams that are leading tend to take fewer shots from closer in. JLikens looks at score effects and penalty rates. Great stuff.
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" George E.P. Box
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 4, 2010 5:41 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs






































