Side-by-Side Slumps
On paper, both Brooks Laich and Brendan Morrison have had tremendous starts to the year, serving as two of many offensive weapons for the high-octane Capitals. After all, they have admirable numbers through just over half a season. Laich has 31 points (11G, 20A) through 44 games and is on pace to surpass his career high in assists, while Morrison's 26 points (10G, 16A) during the same span is just 5 points shy of his offense for all of last season.
But numbers don't tell the whole tale, and both Laich and Morrison have been struggling offensively of late.
The team can, as we've seen, put up big numbers regardless of whether everyone's firing at the same level - but it's still troubling when two of your top forwards undergo almost identical droughts. In fact, both players saw a noticeable dip in their numbers since the last blowout win by the Caps - December 5, an 8-2 drubbing of the Philadelphia Flyers. Laich picked up a goal in the win, Morrison an assist.
Since then, however, the drop-off has been pretty dramatic:
Impressive numbers to start the season, less than impressive in the last third. Laich had points in 16 of the first 29 games, 7 of which were multi-point performances. In the last 15 games, however, he's had points in just 5 - and only once did he get more than one point in a single game. As for Morrison, he was only held off the scoresheet 11 times through 29 games and never went more than 2 games without at least a point. Since December 5, though, he has points in just 3 games, sandwiched around a 4-game and 6-game drought.
It's hard to say exactly why they're mired in their respective slumps. Despite falling off around the same time, they play inherently different games - Laich, more of a "finesse grinder" who crashes the net; Morrison, a playmaker with great vision and speed.
One thing that is noticeable in Laich's case is the decrease in shots per game. In the first 29 games, his SOG total had hit 82 - that's a rate of about 2.83 shots per game. He put at least 3 shots on net in 16 different games during that early stretch. Since then, it's dropped to around 2.07 shots per game, and only three times in his last 15 games has he cracked the 3-shot mark.
Morrison's a little trickier to figure out. After defying expectations and coming out of the gate as one of the pleasant surprises of the season, he's stalled and seen his linemates - and ice time - fluctuate game by game. And maybe that's the problem. Maybe all Morrison needs is a little consistency to his game, the same linemates night in and night out to allow him to build chemistry. It's no surprise that he plays well with Mike Knuble, a former teammate two times over - now he just needs to find some new friends to play with.
Whatever the reason, there are signs that their matching slumps are coming to an end. Each picked up an assist in the latest rout against Atlanta. Laich has points in two of his last three and is part of the Flash-as-center experiment, filling out a line that could provide a deadly second attack. Meanwhile Morrison's found himself on a line with newcomer Chimera - someone whose speed and grit could mesh well with his playmaking ability once Chimera acclimates himself to the new system.
And the reality is that it's nothing to panic about - yet. The team's not exactly hurting for goal-scoring while they await a return to form for Monsieurs Laich and Morrison. They'll regain their scoring touch eventually, and the team's got the personnel to carry them through this rough stretch - just another reason to appreciate this team's depth.
39 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This
is why JR is the number 1 hockey blog on the net. Thanks for the insight becca!
I don't know shit about baseball.
Hmm.
What exactly was the insight? I liked the post, but I didn’t come away with anything I didn’t already know. In fact, there was pretty much zero analysis.
Brooks has had fewer shots recently, but that’s a function of cutting down on the hard slappers off the rush that he favored earlier in the season when he was “hot.” He’d just kind of cruise into the zone and let it rip, with some flair too, fun to watch him have fun. Truth is, those shots aren’t going in very often if the goalie is out where he should be (he’s probably looking for a rebound off that shot.. but at the same time he goes high with it more often than not… anyway…). Recently he’s been a little more thoughtful with the puck.
I think his decreased shot total has very little to do with his scoring drought, in fact, I see it the other way around. He started scoring less, and as a result, shooting less (at least he cut out the more aggressive shots), deferring to the talent around him.
The truth is, he had a bunch of PP goal early in the season, and how long can you really hope to sustain that level of PP scoring with all of that talent around you?
However, like Becca said, I definitely see more coming out of Brooks in the near future if he’s playing with Flash and Jizz. That line is bound to score buckets.
BMo on the other hand, isn’t quite as lucky. Considering how solid the top 2 lines look right now with Flash as the 2nd pivot, it looks like BMo, Chim and Fehr are going to be spending some serious quality time together. I hope they find some chemistry.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
Call me crazy but I’m a big fan of the 25-9-16 line. Perhaps only because it keeps our true top 6 together…
www.dclandingstrip.com
We need a good nickname for this line, pronto.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
Those jersey numbers (25-9-16) are actually fairly powerful. Deconstructed, they could be the Perfect Square Line (5² – 3² – 4²) or even the Pythagorean Line.
IS KEPTIN NOW
by EmilyB on Jan 12, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
rec'd
Great pickup on that… now to think of a name that isn’t too nerdy…
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
THIS LINE IS DESTINED FOR GREATNESS. MATH NEVER LIES.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 3:57 PM EST up reply actions
I’m pretty sure this is it. It’s close at least.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
This is the closest to actual, consistent lines we will see for the rest of the year. Truly, everyone just fell into place with Flash playing C. Even if BMo comes back to overachieving, I’d rather have Flash pivot Sasha.
You’ll see the all-star line from time to time… but this is going to stick around. Watch.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
Your PP scoring pace point is a good one.
He needs to find a way to be more effective 5-on-5. I think if he was required to be the puck carrier less often it would greatly benefit his stats.
My ability to post is only surpassed by my ability to pinch pennies.
I agree completely, and playing with Flash and Sasha will let him really prowl down low.
Brook’s role on this team is to accept what comes to him. He has so many creators around him, we (and he) needs to expect to have these types of droughts.
Next week he may get 5 juicy rebounds and clean em all up. That’s just who he needs to be for us this year.
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
I can’t agree with you on this part:
I think his decreased shot total has very little to do with his scoring drought, in fact, I see it the other way around. He started scoring less, and as a result, shooting less (at least he cut out the more aggressive shots), deferring to the talent around him.
I tend to watch him more carefully than some of the others (shut up, peanut gallery) and I’ve noticed that, at least recently, he’s either avoided shooting at the last minute, shot the puck wide or off target, or been flustered when the other team rushes him. If he was simply deferring to the talent around him, I would think he’d have more assists in the last 15 games – and he doesn’t.
But you have noticed that unwillingness to let that long slapper go, or rip a bad angle shot. He is trying to defer to talent around him, whether or not it’s getting him on the scoreboard on under the A column is another story. But is it helping the team? I think so. He just happens not to see it on his score sheet.
And like I said above, Brooks can’t be the guy on our team to force scoring. The creators and playmakers and snipers are around him. His role is to run the play, pick up garbage, clear out bodies. We all know he is capable of (a little) more, but right now he can’t be worried about producing numbers. He is last guy we want forcing the issue trying to get on the board.
As far as I’m concerned he is playing great (well…at least good)
by Bushwood Bushwhacker on Jan 12, 2010 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
And boy, howdy, when they do, the NHL better look out!
If we have everybody firing on all cylinders, this team is going to be frightening.
I need a snappy signature...
Myth
You know when a team last had everyone firing on all cylinders. Never. That’s the whole point of team depth.
Somebody is always going to be less then clicking and only because we over-analyze ever inch of this team on (wonderful) sites like this does it seem like there’s an issue. From another team’s perspective I’d be the farm they look at the Caps and think their rolling about as well as any team can expect to roll.
DC, where Hockey is a baffling ordeal.
by Chris meet Alex on Jan 12, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
As you said, I don’t feel that this is something to really worry about yet. Somehow I think we’re managing to find scoring, and spreading out the slumping is better than having everyone slump at once.
No Alex, no ratings. Know Alex, know ratings.
Laich needs to take a couple of days off if he hasn’t already. There is such a thing as over-practicing.
He’s put in his time and more at practice and everybody knows it. If he takes a couple of days away at this point and clears his head he will most likely perform better.
"I'm not adopted and I'm not an Indian. It's just a coincidence that I have a love of gambling and booze and a knack for catching syphilis." -Jerri Blank
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Laich’s struggles and the power play’s struggle’s have manifested around the same time. As for one being the cause of the other, however – that I am not sure of.
www.dclandingstrip.com
I don’t see it so much as a slump. The team isn’t leaning on these guys right now. They’re not being asked to do a ton, because other players are on fire. There’s only one puck to go around.
Just because the team isn’t leaning on them doesn’t excuse them. Both of them are failing to produce and we really can’t assume that they will start producing when the team is leaning on them.
Now let's say you and I go toe to toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor.
Exactly. This isn’t like Steckel going through a slump – these are long stretches where guys you’d expect to be in the 20-goal range by the end of the year aren’t scoring. It’s troubling. Obviously the team is doing fine without them, which is good, but that scoring threat on every line starts to go away when two guys are struggling.




































