Monday Caps Clips: "The Mystery of the 21st Century"
Your savory breakfast links:
- The Caps' offseason moves have them trending... even. [USAToday]
- Alex Ovechkin on soccer, training (he's not the only Russian Cap working out, btw), the Olympics and his mysterious tramp stamp. [Examiner.com]
- Ted Leonsis's Thursday night was much cooler than mine. [Ted's Take]
- Four "no comments" from Anatoly Bardin on Michael Nylander. [Examiner.com]
- Speaking of Nylander, there's an unconfirmed report (uncorroborated by photographic evidence) that he actually smiled recently. [Hockey! med Marie Hallman]
- Corsi Superstar Eric Fehr really is a stud with respect to that metric. [Objective NHL]
- In case you missed our post on it last week, Brendan Morrison is going to be putting his survival skills to the test for charity. [FanPost]
- Semyon Varlamov has plenty of Calder competition in 2009-10, but he's certainly one of the pre-season favorites for the award. [Hockey's Future]
- If you're the type that gets worked up about video game ratings, this might set you off. [Post Game Heroes]
- Once upon a time John Carlson was a forward, and that foundation has helped his two-way game. [USA Hockey]
- David Steckel (who will be on EITM later this morning) is a third-liner on Team Illinois/Wisconsin, too. [Illegal Curve]
- If the Caps were a beer, they'd be Zlatorog (reviewed at the most excellent Beer Advocate here). [the 6th sens]
- Lose defensive zone draws and you're playing with fire. [Puck Prospectus]
- Former Cap property Jared Aulin (who has something in common with a current Cap) is attempting a comeback. [Taking Note]
- Donald Brashear, a bunch of Flyers and Snoop. I don't mind Snoop. [The700Level]
- Finally, Happy 37th Birthday to Corey Hirsch (lowest career GAA in Caps history) and Happy 53rd to Mike McEwen.
105 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for also being a dead ringer for Simon Pegg while you’re at it Corey.

"The passion of our supporters cannot be contained by clothing."
The real question is… has he ever fired his gun up in the air and gone “ahhhh”?
"My face is my mask."
by Jake Shapiro on Aug 10, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
He sounds a guy from The Wire
Ron and Fez Noon to Three
by YvonLabresMoustache on Aug 10, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Or a spokesperson for the Chicago Blackhawks talking about Patrick Kane. Talk about having a bad summer.
Yeah… that was a pretty sad story, given that Kane probably makes more in a week than that cab driver makes in a year.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, the Blackhawks have had a summer to forget.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
its been pretty magical and entertaining for everyone outside Chicago, though. :)
(except for Havlat)
by ns on Aug 10, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Entertaining in the train wreck sort of way. If they don’t win this year, they’re screwed.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
As an organization, they make Congress look good. In the space of just over a year they have:
1. Signed a quasi #1 goalie to a ridiculously over-priced four-year contract only to have him outplayed by the goalie they put on waivers
2. Fired their head coach (although that was a good move)
3. Fired their GM who was immensely popular with the fans
4. Signed Hossa to a 12-year deal that effectively will mean losing one or two of their young stars and then find out he’ll have to have major shoulder surgery and miss half the season
5. And then have the face of their organization get arrested for assaulting a cabbie over 20 cents.
That’s a pretty good day at the office.
How can you knock the organization both for signing Huet and Hossa and firing the guy that signed Huet and Hossa? If one of those was a bad move then the other should be a good move, right? And no, no matter how poorly CHI is run they won’t sniff Congress’ level.
True, Tallon did sign Huet, so that’s a minus. But he did put together the team that went to the Conference Finals. The Hossa signing was really the work of the Bowman-McDonald cabal. I did forget to list the fact that they screwed up on issuing those qualifying offers and while Tallon took the public hit for that, it’s been reported that McDonald was the guy actually responsible for the mixup.
It’s not Hossa that’s going to make them lose all those players, though, it’s Campbell and Huet (and Buff, and Sharp, and Versteeg, and Bolland, and Ladd, and…). Hossa’s on a pretty amazing contract for now, it’s the other expensive players that are going to screw up their cap situation, or rather the large amount of quality they have there.
Buff and Bolland are the ones I’d look at. Sharp’s contract is a steal. Versteeg’s is higher than it should be bc of the QO mess up but I don’t know that it’s terrible considering what he’d make on the open market.
Yeah, I didn’t mean to suggest that they were all overpaid, just that there’s a lot of them. I’d venture to say Buff and Versteeg are the most movable of the bunch, after Campbell of course (such a terrible signing, although I guess they weren’t sure what Barker was going to do), but who knows what direction they end up having to go.
How is the Campbell K moveable? Who would want that? Buff and Versteeg are moveable, I’d agree, as is Barker. The guy that is really moveable, as in teams are going to bang down the door to get him, is Sharp. He plays all 3 forward spots, PP, PK, and he’s got 3 more years left at 3.9. If CHI can get under the cap this year I don’t think they’ll move him, but next off-season they may have to if they want to keep Kane/Toews/Keith.
Sorry, I meant movable as in “guys they’re willing to lose” not as in “guys that the rest of the NHL would want”. Should have been clearer.
Campbell is the guy they’d probably like to get rid of the most, he’s also probably the guy nobody else in the NHL would want (unless the Thrashers still want him, although with the emergence of Bogo that doesn’t seem likely).
Got ya. That makes sense. I don’t know why ATL would want him… but it’s ATL so maybe they think getting Campbell is the way to convince Kovalchuk they are trying to win. I wouldn’t be surprised by anything ATL does… short of competent management.
I only bring them up because they were the other team in the running to sign him right down to the wire. I don’t know if they were offering such a monstrous contract, but the fact that it was such a close decision (apparently) makes me think they were willing to overpay him just as much as Chicago was, if not more.
At this point I don’t know if even Don Waddell would be stupid enough to take him on without having Chicago make it worth his while.
I agree with you. Between the current roster situation and their pursuit when Campbell was UFA it makes sense to look at ATL. Besdies, the SE is one of the few divisions where Cambpell wouldn’t look like an embarrassingly bad player in his own end.
Do you mean that in comparison to the rest of the division’s defensemen? Because there’s enough skill and firepower in the SE at forward to leave each piece of Campbell’s equipment scattered in a different corner of the rink.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m more upset that they haven’t updated Mike Green’s picture yet. oh well, at least they corrected which Mike Green was on which team.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
at least they have his stats reasonably close to his talent level this time, although i would bump agility up to 88.
by ns on Aug 10, 2009 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions

That is definitely a cute goat. Apparently, “Pivo” is “Beer” in Slovenia. But did anyone else know that “Pivo” is also the word for “Beer” in Czech — the language of the nation that brought us Michal Pivonka? Who knew that his nickname meant “Beer?” Pivonka’s coolness just went up in my book.
Stupid question probably, but has anyone tried this brand at RFD? I could see a whole FanPost on that place, it has everything a growing hockey fan needs…
+1 for the Pivonka link, I wonder if that was a happy coincidence by the original author or just serendipity?
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it."
- Ferris Bueller
by war_capitals on Aug 10, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Wonder if Brash makes Cote fetch stuff for him.
“Riley, beer me.”
“No.”
Brash cocks arm back, Cote flinches. Brash punches him twice in the arm.
“Two for flinching. Now go get me that beer…”
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Aug 10, 2009 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Trending even ....
As they are right now, maybe, although the analysis leaves a lot to be desired, and I think that the change in assistant coach might have a word or two to say about that. Still, they could trend even with last year’s regular season and I’d be okay with that. It’s the postseason where I want to see the difference.
I don’t think that McPhee’s done yet, based on his conference call with the fans a couple of weeks ago.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
Video Game Stuff...
I don’t mind if they rated Malkin ahead of Ovie for last season. Malkin was probably a touch better than Ovie in the regular season (Ovie was more valuable, which doesn’t necessarily mean better…)
If I was a Malkin fan I’d be upset that Crosby was rated better than Malkin. Malkin is a better player than Crosby. Crosby’s a top 10 player in the NHL, but he’s the #2 Penguin and the #2 Candaian (Iginla is better) player in the NHL.
Let's go Caps!
Crosby is better than Malkin. When Malkin isn’t on his game he is invisible. Crosby is never invisible even when he’s not showing up on the stat sheet. Malkin may have a sexier game when he’s on but Crosby is the better player.
If they played on different teams, would the team that had Crosby trade him even up for Malkin?
Not likely.
In fact, you could pose that hypothetical for any player in the sport, and the team that has Crosby isn’t trading him.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Aug 10, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions
If I had Crosby, there would be only 2 players I’d trade him straight up for: Ovechkin and Malkin. If I could get Iginla at the same age, I’d make that trade too. I wouldn’t make that trade now since Iggy is several years older than Crosby.
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Iginla was nowhere near as good at 22. I wouldn’t take that trade.
by DrinkingPartner on Aug 10, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d rather have Malkin than Crosby on my team right now. Crosby goes hard every night, plays his rear end off, and always shows up.
Malkin also shows up too, and when he’s on, he’s the only player that compares to Ovechkin in the Eastern Conference. They’re both great players.
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Malkin also shows up too
except when he doesn’t.
by Natty Bumppo on Aug 10, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
One more thing, as an argument for Malkin being better than Sid. Malkin has been a finalist for the Hart trophy as NHL MVP the past 2 years, Sid hasn’t. Admittedly, Sid was hurt 2 seasons ago and missed a bunch of games. And admittedly, the Hart is voted on by the NHL writers.
But…Malkin and not Crosby was also a finalist for the Pearson award the last 2 years, as presented by the NHLPA, meaning that the players also think Malkin is more valuable to the Penguins than Crosby.
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
well, the players themselves haven’t exactly been shy about their feelings on Crosby. They think he’s a whinny, spoiled brat and given the opportunity to nominate anyone but him for the Pearson, they take it.
by RedBirdie on Aug 10, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
True, but I doubt they vote on their MVP based on popularity. If that was the case, how would Chris Pronger have ever been a finalist for it?
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
It goes against every fiber of my soul to go to the mat to stick up for Crosby, so we’re just gonna have to disagree on this one.
I grudgingly agree, and I was a stout pro-Malkin guy entering the playoffs.
I will stand by my opinion that Malkin’s offensive game is more difficult to shut down for an opposing center because of his sheer physical strength and nose-for-the-net style. Crosby is so deadly in Gretzky’s Office, though and his vision/hockey sense is nonpareil….
/vomits in office trash-can, shakes head
from the house that Red Jesus built
by bigonetimer on Aug 10, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I may hate Crosby as a person, a player, and other things, but I can’t deny that he gained a lot of my respect in our series against the Pens.
by DrinkingPartner on Aug 10, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions
any respect he gained was promptly lost with the whole crying about hats incident.
by RedBirdie on Aug 10, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I was looking for pictures of Ovie and came across one I need to share with y’all. It’s from Game Seven and looks to be taken the moment OV got his breakaway shot lined up and just before MAF made the save that IMO ultimately assured their Cup win.
Is it possible he got distracted even for a milisecond by this classy Caps fan?
IS PAЯTY NOW
Better question: how do you sit in those seats but still wear a generic Capitals shirt? They aren’t that expensive, compared to the price you pay to sit there.
Pen Without Hats, Rec’d!!!
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it."
- Ferris Bueller
by war_capitals on Aug 10, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd as well
…for a brilliant pun.
:)
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough...
…Like I said, either of them can play on my team anytime… I just like Malkin’s game better.
Of course, I like Ovie’s game even better than Malkin’s…
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Ovechking is ranked higher in all the categories that matter for his position. I don’t really care that his passing \ faceoff \ and some other useless stats are ranked a few points lower than Crosby\Malkin.
His shots are equal to or higher. His physical edge should have been bumped up in comparison to them though.
Just out of curiosity, what specifically constitutes “winning” a faceoff? We all know Ovie’s knack for slapping the puck forward behind his faceoff opponent and trying to barge through them to it. Are those automatic “losses” when calculating faceoff percentage, since the puck ended up behind his opponent?
As have I. I’ve been looking at is as whoever touches the puck first after the faceoff. Makes sense to me, which is why it’s probably wrong.
I’m pretty sure that’s how it works. Of course, it’s not perfect – sometimes a guy will “win” a faceoff to his teammate in a bad position and the guy will immediately have the puck taken. But I’m pretty sure if Ovie barges through and touches first, it’s a win no matter what direction it goes.
The Caps’ offseason moves have them trending… even
Even?
First, let’s compare two players…
Player 1: 27-20-47, +5, 11 PPG, 6 GWG
Player 2: 24-50-74, -5, 4 PPG, 2 GWG
Player 1 is Mike Knuble last year. Player 2 is Sergei Fedorov/Viktor Kozlov (and in 119 man-games). On a statistical basis, if they get anything from Brendan Morrison, this is a plus.
And, it presumes no improvement among the rest of the roster, specifically the four core players. Relative to Pittsburgh, they might not close the gap in that regard (yet), but relative to the rest of the conference?
That said, the sticking point is in goal, where — if one can believe it — the matter is even more unsettled than it was this time last year.
If you've read this far...seek help.
The analysis was pretty shallow. My guess is he just couldn’t bring himself to write that a 50-win team was trending up.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
It is entirely likely — probable, in fact — that the Caps will match neither 50 wins, nor 108 points this year. But they are likely to be a better team, absent some debilitating injury. Atlanta and Tampa will be better (they could hardly be worse, and the Thrashers already gave the Caps fits last year).
The trouble is, in the last 20 full seasons of play (discounting the 1994/95 season), 13 of 20 teams winning the Cup also had at least 100 points in the regular season; eight of them had at least 110. Only two Cup winners in this period finished a regular season with less than 90 points. Actually, it was one team that did it twice.
The Penguins.
If you've read this far...seek help.
by ThePeerless on Aug 10, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
The frustrating part of that is that if they have played all-out every night instead of taking the “cake” teams off and getting stomped when they should not have been, they’d’ve been in the running for the President’s Trophy. Take that for what it’s worth, but still.
I care a lot more about the postseason this year, though.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
The President’s Trophy means about as much to me as an attendance banner.
by Scott in Shaw on Aug 10, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
At least the President’s Trophy is directly related to on ice performance.
Meh, I think it would be cool to win it.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, it means a lot more than an attendance champions banner, which means absolutely nothing (in fact, it may mean less than nothing). It’s no cup, but I’d be pleased to see the Caps win the President’s Trophy, no doubt. And home ice in a game 7 is pretty valuable, the bedshitting vs. the Pens notwithstanding.
I don’t know, home ice has been pretty valuable to us in the playoffs. Take Game 7 this year….oh wait
from the house that Red Jesus built
by bigonetimer on Aug 10, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
And is seems like a topic that is getting far less attention this year than last, when folks were questioning if Theo would work here. Yet the CAPS are in a tough spot in goal with Theo being…Theo, and the young guys being…young. Assuming the other moves pan out the way we hope they will, the situation in goal doesn’t feel like a Stanley Cup winner.
Unless something miraculous happens Theo is not taking anyone to a Cup and history does not favor Varly or Neuvirth leading a team to the cup, no matter how great their potential.
Wondering out loud here, but does GMGM look to trade one of the goalie prospects for a proven winner (if there is one) at the deadline if Theo maintains similar form to last year and Varly looks like a very good, but still 21 year old goalie?
by Direction 87 on Aug 10, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Wondering out loud here, but does GMGM look to trade one of the goalie prospects for a proven winner (if there is one) at the deadline if Theo maintains similar form to last year and Varly looks like a very good, but still 21 year old goalie?
In short, no. If the team didn’t feel comfortable going into the playoffs with Varlamov, Theo wouldn’t have had such a short leash last spring.
by Scott in Shaw on Aug 10, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
You are right about that. They have a lot of confidence in Varly. His only issues really are durability, conditioning, and rebound control. All of these things can be worked on and improved. Considering Varly is only 21, there’s a tremendous upside there….
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Aug 10, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
This team is too young, and could be too good for too long, to move Varlamov, and I’m not sure what Neuvy’s trade value is right now.
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
if you’re talking about Holtby, I could see that if Dan Dunn shows promise.
from the house that Red Jesus built
by bigonetimer on Aug 10, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I honestly can’t see us getting a goalie via trade. I haven’t exactly researched the options out there, but it seems to me, especially with the cap situation, we’d have to trade Theo for a better, less expensive version of himself. What team is going to make that trade?
Maybe they’d go for it with one of the prospects thrown in, but that really doesn’t seem like something GMGM would do.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Assuming no trade happens, do they go into the year expecting 52 25 5 from Jose, Semyon, and Michael, respectively? And, if so, barring no injuries, do you committee them in the postseason or try for another Cam Ward style run out of Semyon, spelling him with Theo as necessary?
As for veteran free-agents listed on nhlnumber.com, there’s CuJo, Manny Legace, Manny Fernandez, and of course, some 39 year old German guy?
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
Fehr enough.
I still think they keep the goaltending they have, and the trade deadline move is with someone in the tank and selling, like Colorado, for a player like Ruslan Salei or Adam Foote.
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
I would nix CuJo and Kolzig off that list immediately. I don’t think Joseph has anything left in the tank, and I doubt Olie would want to come back. Fernandez or Legace, maybe. Either way, we still have salary cap issues unless they send Theo through waivers.
For my money, Theo sticks. I think (hope?) he’s going to come into camp with a fire under his ass, if only to avoid being remembered as the guy who choked so hard in the playoffs he lost his job to a 21-year-old. But I’ve always been a Jose fan. I think he can do it (and I sort of wish Bruce would have given him one of the back-to-backs during last year’s playoffs). He has won in the past, and I don’t doubt he’s capable of doing it again.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Unsettled in goal? Really?
Are we that hesitant in committing to Varly as the number one? Theo is not going to take the #1 spot out of camp.
I think Varly does a Cam Ward this year and carries us to the final. Honestly. We’ll have a young D bit I hear guys like Seidenberg and Bergeron are still available, maybe pretty cheap?
Of course someone has to go…I dont think we’ll be able to offload Nylander in the NHL. KHL is our last best hope.
Varly’s quick and talented, but he’s still a little rough around the edges. I think backing up Jose this year will help polish his game, and next year (when Theo’s contract expires) we hand him the keys. He may have been lightning in a bottle during the playoffs last year, but I could still count the number of NHL games he’s played on fingers and toes.
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, it’s unsettled. Varly had one magical run, but he ran out of gas (endurance is an issue) and we don’t know if the rest of the league is going to adjust to him, and if he’ll adjust to them adjusting to him, and so on. It’s way to early to say he’s our starter, just that he could be.
And I’m not saying I think it’s unlikely that he becomes the starter. But it’s far from a lock as well.
Not to mention that Neuvirth’s given the organization a thing or two to think about after that Calder run last year. This is not to say that I think Neuvirth’s ready yet – I think he needs another year or two – but he’s very much on the Caps’ radar. So, given those two and Holtby, I have to ask whether signing another goalie could actually hurt us in the long run.
This is why I think that McPhee waits and doesn’t buy anything else yet. If anything, he trades a D, and waits to see what happens.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
So, we’re going to send Dinamo Riga a really nice cookie bouquet?
Winterion Game Studios
Visit us online at : http://winterion.com
Dunno, it sounded like a month ago Boudreau still thinks Theo is the number one until Varlaverth knock him off. I think he might do a Ward, but perhaps more closely to the 2.80/.900-ish version of Ward’s sophomore year.
"The passion of our supporters cannot be contained by clothing."
by Bald Pollack on Aug 10, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Varlamov could “do a Cam Ward” and lead the team to playoff success or he could “do a Cam Ward” by following up his unexpected playoff success by posting a .897 save percentage and 2.93 goals against average.
Ward also preceded that run with a regular season of 3.68/.882. If Varly does anything similar to what Ward did on either side of his run, he likely won’t be in DC for the full season.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Here is what I believe:
Bruce was really worried about Theo blowing up in the playoffs, BEFORE the playoffs had begun. And all he needed was a reason.
Varly played in the most important games of the season, and Boudreau obviously had the utmost faith in the kid after pulling JT because Theo never even sniffed the goal cage until game 7 of the Pens series.
All that "Theo’s our No. 1 goalie" nonsense was to throw people off the scent.
And isn’t BB known for always being straight up with the players?
by Murshawursha on Aug 10, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
For one it keeps Varlamov motivated. He’s still a kid and outright stating he’s the No. 1 before camp isn’t going to light the same kind of fire under him. Second, it at least indicates to other GMs that he’s not actively trying to move Theo so if there is a trade it will bring back more value (think about him saying he was fine with Laich as the 2C).
39 year old german guy said he was retiring :) (well, sad, but you get my drift)
I figure its just a matter of time before Manny F ends up with his uncle in Jersey.
I have no idea where Manny Legace will end up (maybe Detroit? They sure love recycling their former goalies there), and I think CuJo (oh, another ex-Wing!) may be retired, but not by choice.






































