Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

2008-09 Rink Wrap: Milan Jurcina

From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading the 2008-09 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2009-10. Next up, Milan Jurcina.


Milan Jurcina

#23 / Defenseman / Washington Capitals

6-4

233

Jun 07, 1983

4

Arbitration eligible RFA; qualifying offer of $925,313 needed to retain rights. Contract of $881,250 in '08-'09.

5.08



GP G A P +/- PIM PPG SHG GWG SOG PCT TOI/G
Regular Season 79 3 11 14 1 68 0 0 1 95 3.2 16:09
Playoffs 14 2 0 2 6 12 0 1 0 10 20.0 16:46

Key Stat: Jurcina's 1.6 penalties per sixty minutes of five-on-five play were the most of any Capitals defenseman and 18th worst among all NHL defensemen who played more than thirty games in 2008-09.

Interesting Stat: In the 48 Capitals wins he played in this season, Jurcina scored three goals, had eight assists, and was a plus-fifteen.  In the 32 Capitals losses he played in, Juice had no goals, three assists, and was a minus-fourteen.

The Good:  In some ways Jurcina was a prototypical big-bodied defensemen this past season.  He led the team's blueliners in hits, blocked more shots than anyone else, blocked shots in five-on-five situations more often than anyone else, and occasionally used his big point shot to help generate offense for the team.  Despite the physical nature of his game, Jurcina played in a combined 93 regular season and playoff games, more than any of the team's other defensemen.

More than anything else, Jurcina's play in the playoffs deserves credit.  While most of the team's defense corps played poorly, or, at the very least, inconsistently during the playoffs (in large part due to injury), Jurcina was steady on the back line, and finished second to Tom Poti in five-on-five goals against per sixty and five-on-five goal differential per sixty - a performance that has, in the minds of some Capitals fans, earned Jurcina a spot on the roster to start the 2009-10 season.

The Bad:  Ever since he was acquired by the Capitals in 2007, one of the biggest knocks on Jurcina has been his inconsistency.  The same guy who looks like a solid top-four defender with a decidedly physical edge one night can just as easily look overmatched by the speed and skill of the NHL-level game the next, and no one seems to know exactly why or exactly which version of Jurcina is going to show up on any particular night.

Even when he's playing well, Jurcina's game has some flaws.  He takes far too many penalties - more than just about any defenseman in the NHL, in fact.  While it might be acceptable for Juice to make frequent trips to the penalty box if he were establishing himself as a physical presence in front of his netminders, that's simply not the case.  This past season Jurcina received just two roughing penalties to go along with his eight holds, seven hooks, four trips, and four interference minors, penalties that belie Jurcina's biggest physical weakness: his skating ability.  Even when Jurcina's playing well, he's susceptible to being beaten by quick, skilled forwards, a problem Juice still needs to work on mitigating by playing better position and making better decisions.

The Vote: Rate Jurcina below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.

The Discussion: Who exactly is Milan Jurcina?  Is a guy the Capitals can pencil in as a solid contributor for their future?  Or is he a guy who's merely acting as a placeholder until the team can find a better option?

Poll
How do you rate Milan Jurcina's 2008-09 season?
10
3 votes
9
2 votes
8
35 votes
7
152 votes
6
173 votes
5
76 votes
4
29 votes
3
17 votes
2
5 votes
1
1 votes

493 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Japers' Rink

Recap: Caps 5, Isles 4 (SO)

Mar 2012 by J.P. - 221 comments

Tuesday Caps Clips

Jun 2011 by J.P. - 523 comments

Comments

Display:

6, 4 for his play in the playoffs.

If he can play like that, he’s a decent player. If not, he isn’t good enough.

by Chimaera on Jun 4, 2009 7:44 AM EDT reply actions  

I’d say he’s already kind of decent, particularly when you compare last year to this. In the regular season he quietly allowed the second fewest goals/60 on ES among d-men as well (Erskine). Gave him a 7, qualifying him next year is automatic, with an eye towards an extension.

by Bald Pollack on Jun 4, 2009 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I gave him a 6 – watching him during a lot of the year was frustrating, but for the streetch run and the playoffs, he was solid as a rock. Wonder if they’ll pair him with Alzner next year?

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri

by gotsparkly on Jun 4, 2009 7:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Great artcile J.P… you really summed up exactley what I think of Juice. Gave him a 7 because I didnt expect anything from him this year. Instead, he shows up playing physical with some top notch players, but most importantly playing so many games and still looking fresh. Yeah, he was inconsistent. But that was expected coming into this season, at least for me. To get a 10, he needs a) to put more shots on net. The same guy who breaks the plexiglass during practice only had 95 shots this whole season?? Somethigns wrong with that….. b) he needs to continue to play as much as he has. c)his 80 total PIMs need to drop to 40-50, and even that isnt too good. Ideally drops to 30. Finally, he needs to become a bigger emotional presence on the team. Hes a blue liner who could be with us for a while, and I want him to esatblish himself as the veteran-ish player that he could be.

by amkcaps on Jun 4, 2009 8:00 AM EDT reply actions  

He shot a lot more than that, but his aim is horrid. The 95 figure is only SOG. Like I said in my comments on who to keep and who to get rid of, Jurcina’s got the ability to make defensemen and glass walls everywhere duck – if he was more accurate he’d be scary.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri

by gotsparkly on Jun 4, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not just his aim that sucks, he also has a very slow shot delivery. By the time it takes him to get his body in position, wind up, and shoot, most defenders can get in the shooting lane. That prevents his booming shot from getting off his stick.

by Kareem E. on Jun 4, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also gave him a 7 for many of the same reasons. We always say we want a large physical presence defensman, and that they don’t grow on trees. Well, we have one, he is just still a work in progress. Liked the increased hitting this year. Liked the blocked shots. Want to see more crease clearing and more shooting. Would also like to see him (and all our defense except Green) move the puck out of the zone faster. If a quick outlet pass isn’t there, sometimes just dumping the puck out to center isn’t a bad play. It sure beats getting forechecked and turtling along the wall while your forwards are skating towards the other end.

I also really think that Jurcina could shine with the right partner. I would venture to say that most big (size and hitting) d-men are matched with a quick skating guy. Gill is slow as crap, has Scuderi to back him up. Chara has Wideman. Don’t know who Pronger has, but he’s a freak of nature anyway. I’m not saying that Jurcina is as good as any of those guys, but his play style and what the team expects from him is similar, and he needs a similar partner. Unfortunately the only guy on our team this year that fit that mold had to partner Green, which was more important. But boy, Jurcina sure did look good when he was partnered with Alzner for that stretch.

For Juice to get a 10 next year, penalties would certainly have to go down. Shot total would have to go up. Blocked shots and hits would have to increase a bit as well. He led the team this year, but it still isn’t good enough for a 10. Most likely for Juice to get a 10, he would need a partner that would be able to cover for him while he is doing the above. Alzner anyone?

by HateOffSeason on Jun 4, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree 100% with the the partner comment, especially that he looked great with Alzner. Pair Juice with a puck moving defensman and see what happens. A little bit of a stretch, but what about him and Carlson? Those would be two damn hard shots….

by amkcaps on Jun 4, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d want Alzner with Juice, myself. What about Carlson/Erskine? Carlson has the speed to balance Erskine and that puts a good hard shot on both pairings.

"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri

by gotsparkly on Jun 4, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that makes more sense. Just to get those two weaned into the league. Eventually we have 3 d lines, with green alzner and carlson leading each of them. But that’s slightly into the future

by amkcaps on Jun 4, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

God, I love the sound of that future.

by Scott in Shaw on Jun 4, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec’d

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 4, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

The penalties have to effect his rating…and also the smile he always gives when skating to the penalty box.
You’re being punished, quit smiling!

by Stormblue on Jun 4, 2009 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Earned another contract

1) Probably a 5 for the regular season, but his playoff performance bumped him up 2 to a solid 7. he was supposed to be one of the odd men out coming into the season. He especially seemed to come into his own when he was paired with rookie Karl Alzner back in December
2) He’s certainly earned a contract offer. At 900-1 mil/season he’s an affordable option as a #4-5 defensemen.
3) To garner a 10 next season ‘Juice’ would have to play 75+ games. Be a ‘plus’ player. Cut down his PIM’s. Perhaps attain 25 or so points, and play as a top 4 defensemen for a majority of the season

I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else

by Fauxrumors on Jun 4, 2009 8:22 AM EDT reply actions  

“Nifty 50” as someone used to call the duo was pretty damn sweet when they clicked. I gave Juice a solid 6 with a must qualify offer.

As everyone noted, his consistency needs to improve but also his up his willingness to shoot from the point. This puts so much damn pressure off our forwards and allows them to play a little dirtier style down low and cheapy goals

by ns on Jun 4, 2009 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

First off I’m a big Juice fan. I think it’s been understated how he’s the only Slovak on the team and I had read that the trade from Bos really shook him up.

The biggest thing that stood out to me was his play with Alzner. I think thats the Juice that we may see next year and beyond. There were a few posts this season talking about how Juice has always seemed to be paired with similar slow defensemen. When Karlzner came up he seemed to relax some.

I’m excited for next season for Juice, his play was better than we’d seen in the reg season and he stepped up in the playoffs. 5 for playing like before, 1 for the improving reg season, 1 for the playoffs, and one for the fact that I’m an optimist about Juice.

by MetalCap on Jun 4, 2009 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

The Discussion: Who exactly is Milan Jurcina? Is a guy the Capitals can pencil in as a solid contributor for their future? Or is he a guy who’s merely acting as a placeholder until the team can find a better option?

I think he’s the latter. He’s a third-pairing guy who within 2 years will become more expensive than he’s worth (one year behind Mo on that path). He’s had plenty of chances to elevate his game. I think the Juice we saw during the regular season this year is Juice. That’s who he is, and he ain’t going to suddenly become a top two pairings kind of guy. If you’re asking more out of him, then you don’t have the depth you need to win the Cup.

I say sell high. He had a great playoffs. Last year the team sold high on a defenseman who played over his head in the playoffs (Eminger), and got a pretty good return. I believe there are teams who would pay good value to obtain Juice. And there are certainly things this team needs. But I, for one, don’t think Juice is ever going to meet his potential. The player we’re seeing is the player he’s going to be.

by Gould Old Days on Jun 4, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Let’s see if he’s given the opportunity to play with Alzner for more than half a season before making that judgment. For example, Carolina’s Cole was awful away from the Carolina system. It may be that Juice needs a specific component (which Alzner seemed to bring) to be the most successful. I just hope Alzner comes in and plays well from the get-go. I think, if he plays a great season because of a steady, complimenting partner, they could very well be top-four in themselves, and we’ll be glad we didn’t sell so early.

by DrinkingPartner on Jun 4, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m going with a 6. I’m thinking that the expectations were merely pedestrian, and especially earlier in the season, that’s all he was. But he got better as the season wore on, despite the penalties. Every time I’d think that maybe he was improving in that area, then he’d do it again. But the improvement through the playoffs was nice.

He may be nothing more than a placeholder, but he’s earned a contract for next year without question.

by gfcaps fan on Jun 4, 2009 9:21 AM EDT reply actions  

At 26 and entering his sixth season, what we’re seeing from Juice (btw, is that really a good nickname these days?) is probably what he’s going to be. And that’s not bad. He’s not a top four defenseman on the Caps, but he’s a very solid 5/6. In his next contract, he’ll probably get a little over a million per year which would be a good deal for both sides. If he can cut down on his penchant for stick penalties (a guy his size doesn’t need to use his stick that much), put more shots on goal and contin ue to take the body like he did in the playoffs, he can be even more valuable. Let’s put it this way, at a million dollars a year I’ll take him any day over Erskine. I gave him a 6.

by b.orr4 on Jun 4, 2009 9:21 AM EDT reply actions  

“If he can cut down on his penchant for stick penalties (a guy his size doesn’t need to use his stick that much)”…
But isn’t that what slow D do to slow the speedier forwards? Unless you’re saying just clutch or grab instead in lieu of the stick. Either way, it’ll get whistled, since we arent the Pens.

by S h a g g y on Jun 4, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

To survive, slower players have to learn how to anticipate the play and position themselves to cover for their lack of speed. With his size, if he’s in the right spot he should be able to use his body instead of his stick. Or at least use his stick to poke check and not to restrain. Jurcina isn’t going to get faster and if he doesn’t become more of a student of the game, this could be his last contract.

by b.orr4 on Jun 4, 2009 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d add to “the bad” that behind-the-back hand pass into the center of the defensive zone against PIT that quickly ended up behind Varly. And that’s my problem with Juice – I’m fine, even pleased with his development physically and love the upside there. But he always seems one shift away from that critical, back-breaking mental error. It may be a confidence thing with him, but until his mental game catches up with the physical, he’s replaceable (though not necessarily easily).

I gave him a 6 – the higher-end of what I expected from him.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 4, 2009 10:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Why didn’t you just put that stuff in there when you originally wrote the post?

by Rob Parker on Jun 5, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because DMG wrote the post.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 5, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which was probably your joke/point. Tired am I.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 5, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I read it up above and was just messin’. I knew DMG wrote the Jurcina Rink Wrap when you said there was technical difficulties holding up the post but you were around all day and DMG was missing. I don’t need no stinkin’ byline.

by Rob Parker on Jun 6, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d add to "the bad" that behind-the-back hand pass into the center of the defensive zone against PIT that quickly ended up behind Varly.

Thanks for bringing that up again. I had just about erased it from my memory bank.
“Let’s see, we’ve only got a few seconds to get out of the period with the lead. What should I do? I could push the puck into the corner. That’d be a smart play. Or I could kind of hover over it and wait for reinforcements. That could work. Wait, there’s a wide open patch of ice right in front of my goalie. I’ll shove it there.”

by b.orr4 on Jun 4, 2009 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I guess I just expected more from him. A 26 y/o in his 4th campaign I figured 25 pts, and 150 booming shots from the point. I got neither. Instead I saw a slow defender with a penchant for penalties and some unbelievable mental mistakes. Yes he’s big, yes he’s physical, but if you’re going to be a pylon you need to play like the best pylons in the game. And that he ain’t. 3. I’m with G.O.D., he’s a placeholder and/or trade bait.

by wittcap79 on Jun 4, 2009 10:34 AM EDT reply actions  

i agree to a large extent. i gave juicy juice a 4, mostly because i expected he would continue improving, but by the time the playoffs rolled around and schultz was still an option, we (the fan base, not the caps) were considering leaving him on the bench during the postseason. a 4 and not a 3 because of his work in the rangers series. when jurcina is on his game, he really does look like a poor man’s zdeno chara…like DMG says, a top 4 defenseman. his shot from the point is wicked, he’s looked very good on occasion at the point, and he hits. but to steal a phrase from bill simmons, on other nights he looks like a “homeless man’s” chara, and at 26 i’d have hoped to see major progress in the mental errors department.

as with fedorov and shaMo and others, i think the penalties taken category is what sours me the most. partly a personal bias, and partly because that was one of the team’s most glaring problems overall. i’m very excited for alzner’s development, since he promises to be leaps and bounds better than most of his teammates to this end.

by Natty Bumppo on Jun 4, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

at 26 i’d have hoped to see major progress in the mental errors department

Hey, he won’t be 26 until Sunday!

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 4, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

my bad.

which makes him exactly 2 years younger (to the day!) than sergei fedorov’s ex-wife..

(i hope this at least somewhat makes up for my transgression..)

by Natty Bumppo on Jun 4, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whom, incidentally, you could date.

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world

by J.P. on Jun 4, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

a little creepy that they used a picture from when she was ~16.
(not that i wouldn’t.. [self-edited])

by Natty Bumppo on Jun 4, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

A 3....

I expected little from Juice going into this year, and I was right, the Caps got little from him. He should be entering his prime and get better each year, but he’s no better than the 23 year old we saw 3 years ago.

Offensively, he has a great shot, that he rarely if ever uses (esp. in the regular season). He used it more in the postseason and he got some results. If he will shoot the puck more in 2009-10, then he might be able to get from the 1-5 goals area to 8-12 goals. A goal every 10 games is not an unreasonable expectation for someone who can shoot harder than everyone on the team except one player (Ovie shoots harder…)

His playmaking on offense is usually adequate, he rarely looks to make a play to the net, usually opting to dump the puck to the corner, which is usually a safe play.

His play in open ice is dreadful, especially when he doesn’t have the puck. He usually ends up getting caught out of position at least once a game, and then, due to his speed, has to hook, trip, or hold someone to catch up , resulting in penalties. In his own end, it’s the same thing, he gets beat a lot because of his lack of speed, and lack of positioning.

It’s not that a slow player can’t play in the NHL and be effective on defense. Joe Reekie was slow and he was always in position to stop folks, he rarely got beat. Mark Tinordi wasn’t a speed demon either, and he was out there a lot against the top lines as well. It can be done if the player plays smart. Of course, now Reekie is a TV analyst discussing the game and Tinordi is a coach. Jurcina is slow and his decision making isn’t all that good.

Clearly, he is a place holder until the Caps develop some more defensemen. I don’t think Alzner is the replacement for Jurcina (if Morrisonn gets a nice big arbitration win, the Caps will let him go and Alzner steps into a top 4 role with the team). But a big defenseman with good presence in front of the net can usually be found either at the draft (in exchange for a pick) or at the trading deadline. Plus there is the free agent wire. If the Caps go after a Jay McKee type of player and land one, Juice’s days as a Cap may be over.

How does he get to a 10? Score 8 goals and cut the PIMs in half. That’d be enough for me.

Let's go Caps!

by MikeL-Pivonka on Jun 4, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Juice got 7 from me. He showed ability to elevate his game in the second season, and he showed marked improvement over 07-08 (particularly in playoff performance). He is a solid 4-5, and showed pretty well with the King, IIRC. Frankly, I didn’t expect as much from him this year—I am still wondering concerned if this is the ceiling, but I still hope GMGM gives him a decent deal and moves on to other more pressing issues. How about 2yrs/2M?

from the house that Red Jesus built

by bigonetimer on Jun 4, 2009 11:53 AM EDT reply actions  

While the numbers may never lie I do recall not hearing Jurcina’s name nearly as often later in the season or seeing as many moments where Juice was the obvious culprit in a goal later in the season- certainly comparably to previous years.

6 seems low, 7 high. That’s probably a personal problem. I gave him a 7 and let it average out with the votes out there already.

by Icebat on Jun 4, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

His true value to the team is not his contribution on the ice, but the super high-quality interviews he gives between periods of a game. For those, I give him a 10. Keep those interviews coming so I can keep playing the “What the hell’d he just say!?” game.

Honestly, I loved this guy when we first got him. I thought he played better than he got credit for last year, and he improved this year over last, but he’s got to step it up again next year. Maybe a pairing with Alzner for a full year will be the key to his development.

by FFSEnough on Jun 4, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I vaguely remember what your talking about with the interviews… anyone have a place where I can see actual examples? It’d be a nice way to spend this boring rainy afternoon haha

by MetalCap on Jun 4, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Juice got a 6 from me, probably because I had higher expectations than most here. I disagree that what we see from Juice is what we will get in the future. I believe he still has a lot of upside, hoping that he is a late bloomer and will continue to improve with respect to decision making and positioning. Regardless he is a solid #6 and pairs well with Alzner, who should be on the third line next year.

Unfortunately, there are several problems with bringing Juice back even as a placeholder. 1) Erskine basically fills the same physical 3rd pairing defender that can’t skate but is solid in playoffs niche. I think I would rather have the cheaper Juice, but Erskine is under contract and can play goon if needed. 2) Carlson could play in the NHL next season 3) We have a lot of defensive depth in Hershey in addition to Carlson. Best case scenario for Juice: BB wants 7 defensemen, GMGM trades some of that young defensive depth away for a solid prospect at center, and Juice gets a qualifying offer.

by CaliCapsFan on Jun 4, 2009 2:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll admit Jurcina is inconsistent. (A mercurial Gemini, we could say.) He seemed to play well when teamed up with Alzner. I assume we’ll try that combo again next year. He did well in the playoffs (and was one of the few healthy D-men we had).

Odd note: he shares a nickname with my younger daughter (who was known as “Juice” back in first grade. She was “Juicy” while her friends were “Oreo”, “M & M”, and “Broccoli”.)

I’d say, it would be too soon to give up on him.

by CapsFan75 on Jun 4, 2009 7:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Washington Capitals blog from the most powerful city in the world

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Capitals Contract & Draft Info. - 2012 Offseason
Monkey_small
Collecting on that 2nd Rounder for Varlamov
File3551291133107_small
Let's Show Some Love for the Captain
Puck_bunny_by_qwerty3png_small
Pledge Drive 2011-2012 Wrap up
2438624750100337552s425x425q85_small
Offseason moves?
Gould_small
I'm Proud of the Washington Capitals
Me_and_a_late_friend_small
Round 2 Bold Predictions: Let's Review!
Jp_avatar_2_small
Braden Holtby's Family Gets More Interesting By The Minute
Hockeyjerseys1-99_small
Win Tonight
N1230931879_30909553_5511_small
Alex Semin: Gettin' Paid (With Fancy Charts!)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

OT Hockey 5/25
Will lack of national discussion cause NBA, NHL playoffs to suffer?
OT Hockey 5/23
Caps Signed Hockey Sticks
Dean Evason talks wristers in the May 28, 2012 issue of ESPN The Mag. (Click here for a larger version)
Semin's Agent Says Sasha's Uninterested in Staying
"My legs felt good and I wanted to be dangerous with the puck every time,"...
Oh well. Season's over... (via Mr. I, via @bruce_arthur)
NYC game 7 viewing
Game 7 in Manila?

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

More great SB Nation Blogs

The Vault

Guidelines_medium Cap_side2_medium Draft_side2_medium Exchange_medium Cba_side2_medium Rules_side32_medium


Managing Editor

Jp_avatar_2_small J.P.

Associate Editors

Witt_small David Getz

At_kettler_small Becca H

Avatar_small Kareem E.

Golf_murphy_small Rob Parker

Ad34hihocwl0x15cmoubvuxdb-ehczsv8ag3k6qkujpodapllokm7crajbsbss2axbdk11fp2iur8jkoxdxmitirvrgrctxufboskj7xu4bwhtulx7o19cm_small Stephen Pepper

Captain-c_small EmilyB

Contributors

Ov_avatar_small tuvanhillbilly

Moderators

600full-fear-and-loathing-in-las-vegas-screenshot_small Bald Pollack

Gould_small Gould Old Days

79c29_small Knee high to a duck

4140101486_small Rink Moderators