2008-09 Rink Wrap: Brian Pothier
From Alzner to Varlamov, we're taking a look at and grading the 2008-09 season for every player who laced 'em up for the Caps for a significant number of games during the campaign, with an eye towards 2009-10. Next up, Brian Pothier.
Key Stat: Simply put, after suffering through headaches and hell for 14 months, following a crushing hit by Boston's bruising winger, Milan Lucic, in January of 2008 which concussed him and altered his vision permanently, Potsy returned triumphantly and played over 16 minutes a game for the final month of the regular season and through two tremendously draining playoff rounds.
Interesting Stat: His only goal of this season, and post-season, was a game-winner (March 27th vs. TB).
The Good: It gives me great joy to write this one. Pain, fear, perseverance, faith, and then, finally, rebirth. The extraordinary return of Pothier was a hockey miracle. And as for his team, Potsy's restoration to full health and regular duty, frankly, allowed the Capitals to proceed into the post-season, no matter what happened at the trade deadline, within the confines of the salary cap and without unbounded anxiety that one significant injury to the blue line would completely unravel the D corps. In fact, he effectively replaced an injured Jeff Schultz after just game one of the first round series versus the Rangers. Even in mid-March, would you have thought him good for more than 16 minutes a game in the post-season, a tick more TOI/G than Milan Jurcina? Imagine how the team's defense would have fared against the Rangers (not to mention the Penguins) without Pothier and without Schultz and with a busted Mike Green?
Potsy's recovery provided a critical Plan B for GM George McPhee, who didn't have to mortgage the future to acquire a veteran defenseman insurance policy at the deadline (even if it were salary cap possible to do so).
In that healthy dose of ice time, almost 15 minutes per game of which came at even strength, Pothier, paired with John Erskine, basically held it together. Once getting comfortable again with the speed of the NHL game, and after taking and dishing a handful of heavy hits, he seldom looked out of place. Sound decision-making was, again in this spring as it was before the January 2008 concussion, a hallmark of Potsy's game. Nothing fancy, nothing crazy. He finished +2 at ES during the playoffs, and was on for two PP goals. All of his other peripheral stats were, frankly, unremarkable. And for Pothier, this season, unremarkable is ok.
That GWG against Tampa, the exclamation point to his comeback statement, and the standing ovation which followed in the stupendously loud Centre Verizón, brought tears to my eyes. It was a moment in team history that should be fondly remembered for a good long while in Capsland.
The Bad: Even a full season's performance at the level at which Pothier performed for 22 games this spring would fall below what may reasonably be expected from a $2.5 million defenseman. But we must manage those expectations, and see what this September's training camp, and a full season from the start, brings for Potsy in the final year of his Capitals pact.
A healthy Brian would be called upon to shoot more, certainly more than his recent average of less than one S/G. And perhaps spend more time on the PP point, spelling Tom Poti, with his left-handed shot, as he sometimes did during the 2007-08 season before he went on the IR.
But that's all looking forward. Again, for what was expected of Pothier this season, and his tremendous comeback, his Rink Wrap should be overwhelmingly positive. But, of course, we want to know your reasoned opinion.
The Vote: Rate Pothier below on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best) based on his performance relative to his potential and your expectations for the season - if he had the best year you could have imagined him having, give him a 10; if he more or less played as you expected he would, give him a 5 or a 6; if he had the worst year you could have imagined him having, give him a 1.
The Discussion: Could Pothier emerge from September camp as more than a third pair defenseman? Does he still have room for improvement relative to his performance this past spring, in what will be a pivotal contract year in his hockey career? What will it take for him to earn a 10 rating next year?
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is a hard one. My expectations were that he would never play another hockey game, so that he was able to give them 16 minutes per night is 10-worthy. But, not surprisingly, he seemed to hit a wall in the 15-20 game range, and stumbled a bit early. Of course he did.
That he’s back playing deserves a big score. The actual performance was in the expected range. 7.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
That he’s back playing deserves a big score. The actual performance was in the expected range. 7.
Ditto.
I think he’ll spend his time on the 2nd or 3rd pair, with the hope that he becomes slightly more involved in the offense than Monday’s RW subject. That said, I’d presume numbers and money leaves him either signing a reduced contract next year, or not being resigned at all.
by Bald Pollack on Jun 12, 2009 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d presume numbers and money leaves him either signing a reduced contract next year, or not being resigned at all.
Not to mention the cold, hard reality that while every player may be skating his last shift any time he takes to the ice, the risk of Pothier doing so are much greater than the average player, and there’s a price point on that risk.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I just hope that he rewards the Caps for their patience with loyalty, and will stay for pay-cuts, assuming he’s able to keep playing. We will need veteran presence, especially these next couple of years.
by DrinkingPartner on Jun 12, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m amazed at since he’s come back how he’s taken over the veteran presence on the team. How often did you see him quoted during the playoffs? Who’s been showing up at events the past few weeks? [I assume a large reason for that is he’s one of the few players still in town, but still.] Pretty impressive for a guy who didn’t play until March.
I’ll add to the chorus of those who expected that he’d have to retire, not come back late in the year and actually have an impact. Being in the stands when he scored that goal — that place was just electric. He was gone for so long, that I really couldn’t remember what kind of a player he was before he got hurt; I only remember reading complaints about him not being effective because he was playing on a line above his ability. I also understand way more of what I’m watching now than I did before he got hurt.
I’m with everyone else here. Just making it back is worthy of a 10. The feel good story of the season. Next year is a different story. Needs to be productive.
Definitely the feel good story of the year for the Caps. Too bad they didn’t win the Cup, this would have had Disney movie written all over it.
by HateOffSeason on Jun 12, 2009 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Btw, some of these head shots (no pun intended being in the Potsy post) crack me up. Seriously? Couldn’t find one without his tongue wagging?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I expect it will be very much the same with Semin and Steckel and the other two whose names I’m blanking on that are in the media guide.
by DrinkingPartner on Jun 12, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Coming back from the concussion—after being written off by everyone—deserves a ten. His play didn’t stand out in any way, but we’re rating relative to my expectations.
I agree here… 10
I didn’t expect to see him on the ice at all at the beginning of the season, so the fact that he skated at all is above and beyond my expectations.
His play itself, worthy of a 4 IMO from my “Pothier standards” … but I’m still amazed he played at all, so it’s a 10 for me.
Totally agreed. I figured the only reason he hadn’t retired was so that he could stay working with the same doctors. The day he would get a clean bill of health would be the day he called it quits.
Then he came back and played and scared the hell out of me. Not with his ability to play, but the fear that he was putting his quality of life in jeopardy for the remainder of his life. But, he did ok.
Unfortunately, regardless of how he plays next year, he probably becomes a cap casualty. He just makes too much money to be a 3rd pairing guy. The only way he stays I would think would either be to take less money, or if Poti is moved.
To earn a 10 next year Pothier would have to continue his comeback. Increase minutes to near 20/game, 8 goals, 15 assists, +5. We still need to find some offensive production from someone on the blue line who isn’t named Green.
by HateOffSeason on Jun 12, 2009 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions
An unexpected and fairly solid comeback from injury gets a 7 from me. I like Pothier’s maturity and levelheadedness. I never worry about his play when he’s on the ice (except if he gets hit really hard, then I cringe.)
Rockin' the Red in Section 412
Is it wrong that I think his blue eyes are the dreamiest? I can’t help it…
Rockin' the Red in Section 412
Give me Pothier over Poti everyday. 10 for exceeding my expectations, and a 7 for actual performance.
Well, Monday we’re gonna give you Poti. :-)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
ZERO expectations
1) Being that it appeared that Pothier’s career was over, any contribution far exceeded expectations. By definition he deserves a 10 for perseverance alone.
2) He didn’t look nearly as rusty as one would have expected. As was mentioned he allowed GMGM to allow Alzner to stay in the AHL AND not have to trade for a defender at the deadline.
3) To attain a 10 NEXT time though will be a bit more difficult: Has to play 75+ games. Play as a top 4 defensemen. Be a + player and score 25+ points.
I find sometimes it's easy to be myself
sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else
Based on the re-presentation of the post in this comment, I can declare this mystery solved. One of the Faux(es) is Pepper.
I agree with this. 10 for this year just for the fact that not only did he play, he did so reasonably solidly and was a cornerstone of the blueline in the playoffs. You simply can’t ask for more from him than that.
Next season is a different story. As ohters have said, he needs to continue his comeback and be worthy of his contract – I’m not convinced that he isn’t re-signed yet, though. Depends on how Alzner and Schultz do. I’d like to see him take a point on the PP more often and shoot more – his shot is pretty good when he does, and I’d like to see him play a full, solid season in ‘09-’10.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
10 for me. Somewhat like Jurcia did with Alzner, Erskine played his best hockey after being paired with Pothier. So for me not only was Potsi coming back completely unexpected, so was Erskine emerging as a force on the Blue Line. And I have to give Potsi some credit for that.
Glad he is back. A really good skater on the blue line that this team desperately needs.
7 for me
I had no expectation of Potsy playing this season. When he returned, and actually seemed to immediately return to top 4 Dman form, I was ecstatic. Now as I think about it more, I should have given him an 8…there really isn’t anything he didn’t do on returning, except clear out the crease better in the Pens series.
8
His score is determined by the factor that i didn’t expect him to play this season. So, the fact that he does, starts him out at a 10, at being way above and beyond what I could have expected of him. But the dock in points has to do with his play. He’s not the best D we have, but, for him, I’d say he played better than I expected him to (16 mins a game? after 14 months? Hell yeah). Had he played all season, he’d have probably gotten a 5, but the perseverance is remarkable.
by DrinkingPartner on Jun 12, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions
An easy 10 for me
I thought he was done like dinner. Finito, caput, turn out the lights and empty the ashtrays because the show is over.
Just the fact that he actually showed up on the ice and contributed wildly exceeded my expectations.
Next year is a more interesting question. Now that we know he can contribute, he’s going to have to live up to his salary and the role he was brought here to perform: Top 4 defender and PP presence.
I’d say if he’s a regular contributor on the second line of the PP, plays 18+ minutes a night, ends up with 15 goals, 25+ assists, and a +/- in the upper teens, I’d give him a 10. Doubt it happens, by the way.
A 10...
… that he returned to the NHL at all would have earned him a 9. That he was effective was a 10… period.
To stay at a 10, he needs to emerge as one of the top 4 d-men on the team along with Poti, Green and Alzner. Given his determination and grit, I won’t bet against him.
Let's go Caps!
A nine for me because of the obvious. I expected nothing and he gave a lot more. When he was originally signed, Pothier was forced to play at a level beyond his capabilities. Now, playing on the second and sometimes third pairing, he looks far more comfortable. Assuming none of the eye/head problems return, I looking for a really solid season in 09/10. Maybe just as important as his play will be his presence on what could be a very young defense. As we’re seeing with the Wings and the Pens, veteran leadership on the D is absolutely crucial in the playoffs.
I’ve been operating on the assumption that he comes back, too.
Green, Poti, and Erskine will all be here, due to their contracts. Have to believe that Schultz returns. Alzner probably plays a full season in the bigs. That leaves a couple of slots open.
On second thought, I dunno. He could be gone.
Tough call.
I thought he was under contract next year too, but took a look at the “contract status” bar and it says he’s a UFA?
Ooooooops…reading comprehension fail. UFA after ‘09-’10. That being after next year.
I’m going to blame it on the hangover.
I’m going to blame it on the hangover.
Speaking of which, remember that tigers love pepper, they hate cinnamon.
by Bald Pollack on Jun 12, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, I was going for the movie tie in.
by Bald Pollack on Jun 12, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
The thing that bothers me about the whole Pothier thing was the way McPhee pretty much said, “We’re getting Pothier back and this will be like getting a free agent”. I think that’s a lot of weight to put on a guy who hadn’t played in a year and a half. Didn’t he know that he wasn’t close to game shape? It was almost like he used that as his alibi for not getting anyone at the deadline.
Hopefully he’ll be a solid defenseman next year.
To be fair, at the trade deadline, Pothier had been on the ice practicing for a while. He maybe hadn’t moved up to contact drills, but he was probably in pretty good skating shape. Putting that kind of pressure on him might not have been fair in terms of rusty skills and not being sure he could take a hit, but the team had seen plenty of him on the ice again at that point.
by HateOffSeason on Jun 12, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Could Pothier emerge from September camp as more than a third pair defenseman?
I’d call it possible but unlikely. Of the top four spots I’d think three are going to go to Green, Schultz, and Poti and there’s going to be still competition from Jurcina, Morrisonn (if he’s still around), Alzner, and maybe Carlson.
I think Pothier is the kind of guy who is on the 3rd pairing on a Stanley Cup-capable team (i.e., he’s very effective in limited minutes and sucks the air out of the time when your best defensemen are off the ice). But if a team is asking him to play 2nd pairing minutes, that team ain’t winning no Cup.
by Gould Old Days on Jun 12, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
WHO DO WE ROOT FOR TONIGHT?
They both can’t lose, and the NHL is not shutting down before the game, so which is the lesser evil? I say the wings. Yes, they swept us in dramatic fashion, but I REALLY hate the other team. I was praying for them to shut their doors for good before the NHL rigged the lottery and gave them that effing crybaby. They to this day are fixing games to promote him over Ovie. so…
I gave him a 8, and not just because I expected his career to be over. While his play was nothing special in the regular season, he really impressed me in the playoffs. He was very steady and surprisingly willing to play a physical game for a guy who missed over a year with a concussion. It was encouraging to see and makes me hopeful for his play next season.

by


































