Being Up Front About the Capitals Defense
It seems that the book on the Washington Capitals in the playoff is going to be some variation on the following: great offense, mediocre defense, questions in net. Looking at the team from the outside, it's easy to understand why. The Caps are among the NHL leaders in both total offense and powerplay production, sport great secondary scoring, and in Alex Ovechkin, Alex Semin, Mike Green, and Nicklas Backstrom have four elite offensive talents. Meanwhile Jose Theodore wallows somewhere near the basement when it comes to save percentage, the team's penalty kill units are unspectacular, and the Capitals are noticeably below average when it comes to goals allowed per game. The evidence seems to be not just in the numbers, but in our eyes as well. While Semin dazzles with impossibly nimble hands, Green picks corners with laser-like accuracy, Backstrom makes pass after dazzling pass, Ovechkin runs roughshod over opponents, and Brooks Laich seems to produce points via sheer willpower, Jeff Schultz fumbles pucks, John Erskine struggles to keep up with shifty forwards, and Tom Poti has trouble getting the puck out of his own end. At a cursory glace it seems that that forwards are the ones carrying the team while Theodore and the blueliners (save for Mike Green, of course) are merely along for the ride.
However, the difficulties the Capitals have had with keeping the puck out of their own net are in large part because of the play of the team's forwards. It's not that the team lacks defensively skilled forwards or that its forwards are disinterested in play defense. Rather the problem is with penalties - the Capitals simply take too many and hence spend too much time trying to kill them off.
At even strength the Capitals are a good defensive team. Five-on-five the Caps are ninth in the league in goals against per minute, fifth in shots allowed per minute, third in shot differential per minute, and sixteenth in save percentage, a number that isn't bad given Jose Theodore's poor start to season. In addition only three of the forty goalies who have played more than thirty games have seen fewer shots per minute of even strength time than Theodore. The problem isn't how the Capitals play defense five-on-five, it's that they don't get to play five-on-five enough - few teams spend more time in four-on-five situations or have been shorthanded more times. Fixing that problem starts with the forwards.
As a whole, forwards have accounted for 60.3% of the minor penalties the Capitals have taken this season, a number that is arguably somewhat high given that the inherent nature of playing forward versus playing defense will generally lend itself to fewer penalties but can be somewhat explained away by the fact that more minutes are taken by forwards than defensemen. However what really stands out is the fact that Capitals forwards are responsible for 63.5% of the team's restraining fouls and 63.3% of the team's hooking, holding, and tripping penalties, fouls that should generally only be taken when a player is beaten in the defensive zone. Consider that the team plays a wide open style that can often leave defenseman outnumbered on odd man rushes and that nearly one in every five man-games on defenseman been played by someone who has spent most of the year in Hershey (the number is one in twenty-five for forwards) and those numbers start to look even worse.
Just how significant of an impact do the overabundance of penalties have on the Capitals goals against numbers? Heading into Tuesday night's game the Caps have allowed 74 powerplay goals against, had been shorthanded 375 times, are killing 80.3% of their shorthanded opportunities, and are allowing 2.86 goals per game, twentieth best NHL. Thus, assuming the same penalty kill success rate, here's how the team could have stacked up at the beginning of week:
- A reduction in the number of time shorthanded per game to 4.16, the league median, would result in 329 penalty kill situations, 46 fewer than the team has faced this season. Given that opponents are currently converting 19.7% of their powerplay chances against the Capitals the team's total in powerplay goals allowed would drop from 74 to 65. As a result, the team's goals against average would drop from 2.86 to 2.78 and the team would go from being 20th in the league in goals against average to tied for 13th.
- Getting both penalties taken and penalty killing efficiency to the league median would result in 329 penalty kill situations and an 81.6% success rate, 61 powerplay goals against, and a 2.72 goals against average, which would be good for 12th in the league.
- Forwards reducing their restraining fouls to be equal to the number taken by defensemen would result in 68 fewer shorthanded situations and 13 fewer powerplay goals against and take the overall goals against number down to 2.73, which would be tied for 12th in the league.
- Forwards reducing their HHT to the same number as taken by defensemen would result in 52 fewer shorthanded situations, 10 fewer powerplay goals against, and 2.77 goals against average, which would be 13th in the league.
Realistically, although the team's forwards take too many penalties it's not as if it's a problem that doesn't affect the defense - Milan Jurcina, John Erskine, and Mike Green could all stand to take fewer penalties. Still, it is the defensive players (and to a lesser extent the defensive forwards) who bear the burden of the team's aggressive style of play and lack of discipline.
Building a successful hockey team isn't just about having the best players, it's also about putting players in situations where they can succeed. This season's data - that the team has lost so many man-games to injury on defense, that Theodore was in a significant slump for the season's first ten weeks, and that the team has been so good five-on-five - suggests that the Capitals defense corps has been doing their job when they're put in a position to succeed. If it's the case that this team's defense is it's weakness, it has more to do with how formidable the offense is than shortcomings on the blue line.
35 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think that’s the storyline that matters for WSH in the playoffs: Can they keep out of the penalty box, or will certain forwards HHT the Caps’ way into trouble?
I think it’s worth calling out Fedorov here – only 2 Fs in the entire NHL (min. 20 games) have taken more penalties/60 than Feds at five-on-five, and both draw a lot more (in fact, Feds has the worst raw and per-60 penalty +/- of any F in the League, min. 20 games). That has to turn around, especially from a guy in a leadership position.
Also, the top three Ds in ES ice time – Green, Poti and Schultz – have taken a combined 38 penalties at 5-on-5, or basically one every two games. That sounds incredibly manageable to me, given their ice time, and points to the HHT-happy forwards and bottom-half blueliners as the problems here.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
This is a good point. I’ve noticed Feds going to the box quite a bit recently (he seemingly can’t resist swatting pucks mid-air out of play in the defensive zone) and really hope he cuts it out for the playoffs. He’s the last guy that should be taking so many penalties.
He seems off. Hurt, still sick — something isn’t right. He’s way more openly frustrated than I’ve seen him, ever, I think. He’s not the calm, collected, usual Fedorov lately.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 7, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
That off/hurt/sick may be something else, known as “old.”
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 7, 2009 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He’s made some nice plays (the OT goal in Nashville, the gorgeous feed on Ovie’s goal…was that last week?, the 2 goals vs. BUF), but he’s just doing some dumb stuff out there and seems incredulous when it gets called. Just kind of uncharacteristic, and not really the kind of stuff I’d attribute to being old.
Perhaps I expect the legend to play perfectly every night rather than have warts, but it’s just been a little surprising.
The latter 2 things you mention happened in the last 4 games, along with a -3 and 6 PIMS.
His +/- is tied for the worst of the team in that span (Kozlov, Poti), and tied with Jurcina and Erskine for most PIMS (aside from Erskine’s fighting major).
"Thank God there is a sport for middle-sized white boys.."
He’s definitely in a funk. BB should give him a rest until the playoffs unless he wants to play through this now.
Also, did Feds really get that goal last night? Sure looked like it didn’t cross the line until Ovie pushed it in. Amazing play by the defender to hit it out of mid-air even if it did cross then.
Great prolific day DMG. Quantity and quality.
by Gould Old Days on Apr 7, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
DMG is a busy guy...
Great stuff. Meanwhile I know the best way to get Jurcina from taking penalties…have him up in the press box for games.
Let's go Caps!
Couldn’t. Agree. More.
I mentioned it here, but it bears repeating:
Juice’s 5-on-5 penalty +/- is 26. Erskine’s is -10. Juice’s 5-on-5 penalty +/ per 60 is -1.4. Erskine’s is -0.8.
Erskine’s also allows fewer goals/60 while 4-on-5 and actually is second among the team’s D in 4-on-5 +/- (i.e. he’s the better penalty killer).
The way this team takes penalties and kills them, I’d rather have the guy who commits fewer penalties and who is also better at killing them off.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I just had a scar thought, in that there might be a way to get a penalty from up in the press box, and if there is, Juice will end up getting it…
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Apr 9, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know, but to me, the key to the Caps playoff success is going to be rebounds more than anything. I’m ok with the defense, goaltending’s not great but gets the job done, but the Caps create and blow so many offensive chances because there’s no one standing in front, knocking in rebounds like Fehr did last game.
Whenever I watch other teams’ games, I’m in awe at how many goals are scored that the Caps would just never get, because someone’s in front, paying the price. If the Caps are going to be willing to crash the net and pop in rebounds, with their offense, it won’t matter how many penalties they give up or how low JT’s save percentage is. They’ll win games 7-5, 8-4, fine.
To me, it’s just endlessly frusturating how many times a juicy rebound comes off of one of the Alex’s shots only to be harmlessly steered away by an unmolested defenseman. If the Caps had picked up Tkachuk or Guerin at the deadline, I think they’d be in a much better position here.
Closely related is the fact that the Caps’ forwards just don’t draw enough penalties. Given their skill level, they should put defenders in the impossible position of restrain-or-allow-a-good-shot more often than they do. And going straight to the net is a big part of that. These players are simply too good to have a ratio of penalties taken to drawn as bad as it currently is. Everyone needs to be driving the net more.
by Gould Old Days on Apr 7, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Closely related is the fact that the Caps’ forwards just don’t draw enough penalties
Could some of that be Semin’s reputation for diving occassionally? I wonder if the refs take that into account and that bleeds off on guys like Flash (who tends to go down relatively easy on occasion).
Ovi and Rebounds
Yes, Ovi’s shots tend to leave huge rebounds. The problem is that Ovi is usually the first Caps player in the zone by 30 feet, and a lot of his shots are taken 1-on-2 or 1-on-3. Many times, there is no Caps forward in the zone to even attempt to get the rebound. Even when there are Caps players in the zone, none of his linemates are net-crashers. It’s just a fact of life we live with since Clark went down.
At least on the PP it’s different now. I like the fact that Laich is now the power forward on the PP. He’s gotten some garbage goals/assists by standing in front of the net and screening the goalie/wreaking havoc/smacking the puck.
I'm a rec'ing machine.
Great post and data points. I think (read: hope) that we see a bigger, badder, stronger Capitals come playoff time.
The Caps have an extra notch of discipline and tenacity that they will turn on when the puck drops in game 1 that will outmatch whatever their opponent may be able to muster up.
DMG should just get hired by the NHL to do advanced stats. I’m not a huge stat buff in writing but you make it work and that’s a feat unto itself. Brave.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
To be honest, overall, I’ve been pleasantly surprised this year by both the goaltending and by the D. The offense is pretty much what I expected, but I have to admit that (pre-season) I never expected to see the Caps hit 100 points and aim to take a spot higher than 3rd. I counted on them winning the division, but not being as dominant as they turned out to be.
This team, with its current members and its faults and strengths, can dominate any team in the league (excepting, perhaps, Columbus and LA — god help us if we meet Columbus), penalties included. I think that, in itself, is pretty amazing.
We go shorthanded more than any other team, and we have 104 points and 48 wins. Holy god, guys.
I agree with a lot of this sentiment, actually. While the D still isn’t quite what you’d want to see from a bonafide cup contending team, I feel like the Caps have a quality defensive unit for the first time in an extremely long time. To make serious damage in the playoffs, they (like any other team) are going to have to play smart, disciplined, and lucky hockey for a stretch, but the fact that they are capable of dominating even good teams for prolonged stretches is pretty exciting, especially for a team that can seemingly turn it on when they need to and (optimism time here) seems to have kept it turned off to rest up for most of the past month.
I am dying to see how this team responds come Game 1.
No, unrelated, though I’ve always found Per Djoos’s name amusing in part because of my screenname. It actually relates to a (very, very) stupid inside “joke” (even describing it as such is a stretch) from when I was in elementary school. I continue to use it only because it’s rarely taken when registering for sites like this.
Speaking of screennames, katzistan is pretty great.
New First Line
Flash — Backstrom — Kozzie is working out for us very well. 2 Goals and Plus 2 on the night. Is that our new first line? LOL.
Feds has certainly been taking lots of minor penalties lately. He’s supposed to be the one setting the good example for the kids on his line but instead he’s taking lessons from them. He’s been scoring (i.e. today and the Buffalo game) but taking penalties every time you turn around. (Of course, we’ve had lots of different kids on his lines lately.)

by 

































