Breaking Down the Caps vs. Penguins
This was originally an email to a friend of mine, so I'm sorry if the formatting doesn't quite come through. Apologies for the length.
The emergence of Varlamov has really changed my view of the Caps. Yes, the Rangers were offensively inept, but he surrendered 7 goals in 6 games (and three of those were on Sunday). That's unbelievably good. The goals that did beat him were mostly lucky bounces or absolutely perfect shots. He made a few saves last night that were superb, and crucial, because the Caps were getting outplayed for much of the first and second periods.
Moreover, having Varly back there has changed how the Caps' defensemen play. They spend less time defending the initial shot and focus instead on clearing rebounds. With Theodore, I think they felt as though they had to defend the initial shot, because Theo might not make the save. With Varly, they know that he'll make the initial save, so all they have to do is police up the rebound. Every single Caps defenseman looked so much better over the last few games as a result because they're playing within themselves and the system. Jurcina was an absolute beast last night. Mike Green finally seems like himself after fighting off what was apparently a pretty bad flu virus. The Pothier-Erskine pair has been generally outstanding. Even when the Caps were pinned in their end for much of the second period, the Rangers generated essentially zero good scoring chances.
The Pens are a very, very interesting team. Malkin and Crosby are excellent players, and now that they're not stuck on the same line, they give the Penguins two solid scoring lines. The additions of Guerin and Kunitz were smart - they finally gave Crosby some wingers to play with. Gonchar is an excellent offensive defenseman, Orpik is sound defensively, and Scuderi and Gill are both serviceable penalty-killers. This is a team that made it to the Cup finals last year, finished this season on a torrid streak and dispatched the Flyers in 6.
Look a little deeper and things don't look so rosy for the Pens. Starting with the big two up front, both Malkin and Crosby (moreso the latter than the former) have displayed a propensity to get distracted/flustered by the physical attention paid to them by opponents, and Ovechkin in particular. (Ovie, to his credit, is completely unflappable. I think he doesn't even have flaps.) Guerin and Kunitz were smart pickups, but their second set of wingers (a rotating cast of Fedotenko, Satan, an injured Sykora and other assorted flotsam and jetsam) are not exactly stellar.
Much has been made of the Caps' drop-off in defensive talent after Mike Green. Still, the Pens might have the only weaker defensive corps remaining in the playoffs. After Gonchar and Orpik, you've got small, very young, and error prone (Letang), big and slow (Gill), a decent, but replaceable 4-6 defenseman (Scuderi) and a quintessential journeyman (Mark Eaton). Oh, and the ghost of Phillipe Boucher. Honestly, I wouldn't trade the Caps defense straight-up for Pittsburgh's. I think they'll eventually come to rue giving up Whitney (although they did get a pretty good prospect back in Tangradi). As for Pittsburgh's role players, I think much of this comes down to Jordan Staal. If he performs like he did a couple years ago, they'll be tough to beat. However, it has been a while since he's shown that form and his playoff performance last year was underwhelming. However, the Pens do have more scoring depth in their bottom-six forwards (However, it must be noted that Kennedy, Cooke and Talbot have all spent some time filling in on the top lines and thereby upped their point totals. Still, they score more than their Caps counterparts.)
Speaking of underwhelming, this brings us to Pittsburgh's biggest Achilles' Heel, Marc-Andre Fleury. Fleury was outstanding in last year's playoffs, but he's been only decent thus far in the playoffs, with one truly outstanding game and several so-so performances. He's shown some mental frailty in the past, much like Chris Osgood. There's no doubting his talent, but then, neither can you doubt the talent of Theodore, and look what's happened with him.
So, how does this break down?
Coaching: Advantage Caps. Bylsma has been good, but he just started coaching this team. It's tough to implement "your" system in just a couple months. Also, Boudreau was coaching before Bylsma was out of diapers (exaggeration). Boudreau's adjustments to his lines and the Caps' power-play, along with his call to use Varlamov were all brilliant. Bylsma's one major adjustment was to bench Letang and Sykora (who's not fully healthy) for Boucher and Satan in game 5. It didn't work and the Pens lost 3-0.
Top-line Forwards: Advantage Caps. This might seem crazy, given that the Pens have Crosby and Malkin, but the trio of Ovechkin, Semin and Backstrom is better, and fairly clearly so. The Pens have Guerin and Kunitz, but the Caps have Fedorov and Laich (depending on which line he's on). For me, the injury to Sykora, and the presence of Fedorov with all of his experience, tips this one toward the Caps.
Role-playing Forwards: Advantage Pens. Basically, by putting Laich on a top line and Staal on the third line, the Pens get this advantage. If you switch those out, I'd make the top-lines a push and give the role-players to the Caps. This is also much closer than it may seem. The return of Clark, and the emergence of Gordon and Steckel as great shut-down centers with excellent faceoff skills make the Caps much stronger at the bottom end than they were earlier in the season. Dupuis, Talbot, Cooke, Kennedy and Adams are all decent grinders, but none of them have the offensive upside of Fehr or Fleischmann, although they have produced more offense than the Caps' grinders (Bradley, Gordon, Steckel and Clark/Brashear).
Defense: Advantage Caps. Green>Gonchar. Poti>Letang (right now, anyway, maybe not in the near future). Jurcina, Erskine, Morrisonn=Orpik, Scuderi, Gill, Eaton. The obvious tie-breaker here is at the top-end, but the subtle advantage for the Caps is Brian Pothier. Forced into action by Jeff Schultz's injury after 14 months rehabbing from concussion symptoms, Pothier took a couple of games to get into the swing of the playoffs. Now, however, his smooth skating and his ability to start the transition game with accurate outlet passes have been a revelation, and something that the Caps were missing when Green wasn't on the ice. Paired with Erskine, his speed and puckhandling cover for Erskine's lack thereof, while Erskine's size and physicality make up for Pothier's lack thereof. A classic case of the whole being greater than the sum of the parts.
Power-Play: Advantage Caps. This one isn't as close as it should be, given the presence of Crosby, Malkin, Gonchar and Guerin on the Pens' PP. I think the Pens miss Malone, Whitney and Hossa here, badly. The Caps can be guilty of over-passing and trying too hard for the "perfect" play, but they still put up an 18.2 PP% against an amazingly good penalty killing team and a phenomenal goaltender. Boudreau's ability to coach really shone through here, as he juggled the PP lines to get more net presence (by giving Laich more PP time) and he added Tom Poti to give the Caps an accurate shot from the point.
Penalty-Kill: Push. The Caps put up slightly better numbers against the Rangers, but it was the Rangers after all. Their power play was abysmal. The Penguins had a good PK against the Flyers, but it's also hard to say how much of that was the Pens, and how much of that was the complete and total disappearance of Jeff Carter. The Pens had slightly better numbers during the regular season, but the Caps were decimated with injuries on their blue line for much of the season, and the presence of Theodore between the pipes probably didn't help matters.
Goaltending: Advantage Caps Push. (Poster's note: I originally gave this to the Caps due to Varlamov's stellar play thus far. However, on further consideration - with a nudge from Hooks Orpik - I've shifted this to even). This was the Caps' main area of weakness prior to the playoffs. It remains to be seen if Varlamov can keep playing at this level, but even if he gives the Caps a more-pedestrian .920 save percentage and a GAA under 2, the Caps could take the Cup. No joke. Fleury has been maddeningly inconsistent his entire career, and he has shown a propensity to get down on himself after bad goals. His play has been inconsistent enough, and he's suffered injuries that some Pens fans and hockey obervers were suggesting that he could be supplanted by Ty Conklin as recently as late last year. He has had one amazing game this playoffs, a couple of good games and a host of decent performances. Varlamov has been outstanding, albeit against weaker competition.
Intangibles: Advantage Caps. First, there's the obvious home-ice advantage. After seeing how loud the VC got last night, this is significant. My ears are still ringing.
Second, there's health. Knock on wood, but the Caps seem relatively healthy, especially now that Chris Clark is back in the lineup. This is a guy who's capable of scoring 20-25 goals/season while playing well in all three phases of the game. If he's healthy, his presence in the lineup is huge. The Pens' potential loss of Sykora really hurts. He provides speed and secondary scoring, and he has been a decent playoff performer in his career.
Third, there's faceoffs. The Pens put up good numbers in the first round (55.7%, good for tops in the playoffs). The Caps came in second, at 53.7%. However, over the course of the season, the Caps had the better numbers. The Flyers main centerman was playing with a bum shoulder (although a similar argument can be made that Chris Drury's injury inflated the Caps' numbers). I think that overall, the Caps are better on the draw.
Fourth, there's chemistry. I know that it's immeasurable, but it's clear that the Caps really do play for one another - there is a relationship among the players that is difficult to define, but clearly observable, even from the distance of a fan. This is not saying that the Pens hate each other, but rather that this Caps team has been together all year, and most of the same players were around last year. Many of these guys played together on Hershey's Calder Cup team. The Pens, on the other hand, saw a lot of turnover this last summer and have, in the last two years, traded away or released a slew of players like Whitney, Malone, Hossa, Roberts, Armstrong, Christensen, Conklin. The Pens looked utterly lost mid-way through the season and although their coach paid the price, ultimately the culprit was likely injuries and a lack of cohesion wrought by personnel turnover. The additions of Guerin and Kunitz surely helped on the ice, but Guerin doesn't exactly have a reputation as being a great locker-room presence, and any time a team has to import 2/3 of a top line at the trade deadline, you know there are serious holes in the roster.
Fifth, there's the effect of the previous round. Sometimes, you can read too much into the carryover effects from one round to the next, but I think this is a case where the Caps have an advantage. Looking back at the Caps' season and the times they struggled, if I were to craft a team to defeat the Caps, that team would look a hell of a lot like the New York Rangers. The Caps' strength was their PP; the Rangers' strength was their PK. The Caps struggled against teams that played strong in the neutral zone; the Rangers, thanks to Renney, were very strong at the center of the ice. The Caps struggled to score against good/hot goaltenders because of their inability to create or sustain traffic in front of the net; the Rangers had perhaps the best goalie in the Eastern Conference in Lundqvist. The Caps struggled against mediocre teams where they couldn't muster sufficient intensity; the Rangers were the very definition of mediocre. The Caps' ability to overcome their disadvantage and advance to the second round will make them a better team. They had to find that extra "playoff gear" - I was worried that they wouldn't find it until it was too late, but now that they have, it's a major advantage. Although the Flyers didn't exactly roll over for the Penguins, they did a remarkable job of self-destructing (what else is new?), and Martin Biron played to his talent level, which is to say, decently, but inconsistently. Between them, the Flyers' best two players, Richards and Carter, put up a 2/4/6 -6 stat line. The Penguins probably should have won that series in 5 games.
Sixth, the Caps can thank NBC for the long break between rounds. Normally, playing seven games can be a bit of a disadvantage, because you're exhausted coming out of the last game, and you only have a couple of days' rest before the next round. Thanks to NBC wanting the Caps and Penguins to play on Saturday, the Caps will have three full days of rest and practice before the beginning of the series, which is plenty of time to recharge.
So, what does this all add up to? In my eyes, this adds up to a Caps victory in 5 or 6 games. Crosby and Malkin are great, but their team lacks the Caps' high-end offensive depth, and their defense and Fleury are not good enough to make up for that. People tend to forget what the Pens have lost since last year: Hossa, Malone, Whitney, Roberts and Conklin. That's a lot of talent to lose, and Guerin and Kunitz don't replace that. The injury to Sykora hurts - even if he plays, a shoulder injury will hamper his shooting and puckhandling.
If this FanPost is written by someone other than one of the blog's editors, the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of this blog or SB Nation.
21 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
too much advantage Caps?
Please, do not assault me for pointing this out, BUT:
Horrible playoff history against the Pens – it does matter.
Home ice – Caps have been .500 at VC for like 2-3 months now.
Regular season success means little – and I think only the home SOL was with Bylsma.
Pens just made it to Game 6 of the Finals last year. This is our first trip out of the first round this century.
Plus there is the remote chance that Varly still needs seasoning, but he is our best and only option.
I’m optimistic, excited and rooting for the Caps in what should be a near toss-up series.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Playoff history: get over it. There isn’t a single Caps player remaining from ANY of those teams. Not one. That link was broken when Olie left town. These things matter to fans and the media, not the players.
To better put this in perspective, the Islanders used to beat up the Caps and take their lunch money repeatedly in the playoffs back during the 1980s. Would any of us be upset at encountering the Islanders in the playoffs? Of course not, because they suck.
As far as home ice goes, it’s better to have it than not. The Caps were still a much better team on home ice. The Caps outscored their opponents 142-100 at home, and were outscored 126-130. It’s an advantage.
I didn’t once cite the Caps’ success against the Pens during the regular season, primarily because the Pens re-loaded so much at the deadline, but also because the sample size is small. That being said, it’s not for nothing that the Caps dominated the season series. They are the better team.
The Pens made the SC finals last year, true. That team also had Marian Hossa, Ryan Malone, Ryan Whitney and Gary Roberts. They’ve been replaced with Bill Guerin, Chris Kunitz, Kris Letang and Matt Cooke. The Pens have taken a serious step back talent-wise.
Varly is a question mark. The Rangers were not a powerful offensive team like the Pens. He will be challenged. However, he doesn’t need to put up a ridiculous stat line like he did for the first 6 games – .920 and a GAA under 2, heck, even under 2.25 will likely carry this Caps team very, very far.
This Pens team is not as good as their record over the last half of the season, just as they weren’t as bad as their record during the first half of the season. Their penalty-killing is decent, but their goaltending is shaky. I can guarantee that the Caps will have no problems with their intensity levels during this series. All year long, these are the kinds of teams that the Caps feasted on, while tripping over the likes of the Rangers. I don’t think this one is as much of a toss-up as it may seem.
After Gonchar and Orpik, you’ve got small, untested and weak in his own end (Letang), big and slow (Gill), quintessential journeyman (Scuderi) and a big, slow, quintessential journeyman (Mark Eaton).
This reeks of someone who hasn’t watched the Penguins play. Other than Hal Gill, you haven’t accurately described anyone.
Letang is young, but not really untested being as he’s got more NHL playoff experience than Green, Jurcina and Erskine. Weak in his own end? I don’t buy it. He’s good with his stick and willing to hit. Letang doesn’t always make good decisions though, you should have gone with that.
Rob Scuderi isn’t a journeyman, he’s spent his whole career with the Penguins.
Mark Eaton isn’t fleet of foot, but he’s not slow. And listed at 6’2 and 204, he’s not really big. Average, really.
He followed up his stellar play from last year by promptly playing himself onto the bench this year.
This is just flat out wrong. Fleury was injured this year. He played in 47 of the Penguins last 50 games. Fleury did a lot of things this year, but see a lot of the bench he did not.
So based on your assesments, I think the Penguins team that will show up is going to be a lot different than what you described.
by Hooks Orpik on Apr 29, 2009 6:36 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Btw, thanks for your criticisms. I edited this based on them and I think it’s better for it. Thanks for reading the whole thing, or skimming it anyway! :)
Hey, you’re welcome. We have differing view points, natch, but you have good points and good analysis, not trying to knock that, just pointing out how I see it.
Obviously time will tell which of us was more accurate.
by Hooks Orpik on Apr 30, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I got Pens in 6 after Kunitz freight trains (cleanly) either Green or Pothier and it shakes the Caps to their core.
by Hooks Orpik on Apr 30, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Despite playing on a pretty good team these last two years, Letang has been a minus player. He’s young, so that’s where I get the “untested” from. Playoff experience is a really tiny sample to compare – essentially small enough to be irrelevant for someone of his and Green’s age. However, I don’t think you can dispute the fact that he’s not the most reliable guy in his own end. And he’s small.
My choice of words regarding Scuderi could have been better, but this was an email I wrote to a buddy of mine that I thought I would share on here, so give a guy a break. To me, Scuderi represents the prototypical 4-6 defensive defenseman that’s available via free agency every year for a small fee. He blocks shots and plays well on the PK. He’s Greg Zanon with a cool Italian surname, he’s Karlis Skrastins with a neck. He’s your equivalent of our Jurcina and Erskine. In my mind, that’s a journeyman, even though Scuderi has never left the Pens organization.
Eaton’s in the same boat. I don’t know about you, but I find 6’2 205 to be a pretty big dude. However, I was probably exaggerating to get the repetitive effect.
You’re right on the Fleury count. He wasn’t necessarily benched (that was last year), but his poor play from late December through mid-January, and the 6 goals he gave up to the Leafs on Feb. 14th certainly helped usher Therrien out the door. Given a re-do, I’d simply say that Fleury is maddeningly inconsistent. He certainly has the talent to be one of the best goaltenders in the league.
So, although I made an error of word choice and I should have been more circumspect with my comments toward Fleury, I haven’t seen anything that changes my underlying assessments. Letang is small and makes boneheaded plays in his own end – I tried giving him the benefit of the doubt on account of his age, hence the “untested” comment. Scuderi, even if he has spent his entire career in the Pens organization, is still just an average 4/5/6 defenseman – he’s hockey’s version of “replacement-level.” Eaton is in the same boat. Nothing you’ve said changes my view that, 1-6, the Caps have the better defensemen. Had you guys held onto Whitney, I’d probably have given you the nod, but you traded him for Kunitz and Tangradi. Fleury is maddeningly inconsistent given his talent level. He had a few great games in your series vs. the Flyers, and a few stinkers. Varlamov is a question mark (which I acknowledged), but given his play through the first round, I’d give him the nod in goal.
If I’m willing to concede a point, I’d make it a push in goal on account of Varlamov’s lack of a track record. If you wanted to give that advantage to Fleury based on his past performance, I wouldn’t argue much. However, based on their play thus far in the playoffs, my nod goes to Varlamov with the aforementioned caveats.
D’ohboy, I believe you underestimate the flightless fowl.
Not sure how you give Caps advantage in PK. I’ve seen Caps PK all season and some of the Pens. And the stats back me up. Pens definitely better, however not sure that is a compliment. It’s like saying Hanson is better than the Jonas Brothers. Both are extremely suspect IMHO.
Letang is a good young d-man who played in the SC Finals last year. I have to agree with Hooks, how is he less experienced than some of the guys on Caps blueline?
Pens own the intangibles. They have a huge edge playoff experience wise which is something that should not be underestimated.
Also, no way this series only goes 5 no matter who wins. This thing reeks of 6 or 7 games.
You’re entitled to your opinion, but you clearly mis-read what I wrote, I said the PK was a push, i.e., a tie.
The Caps have had a very slightly better PK thus far this playoff season (with the caveats about the Rangers sucking eggs and small sample size), whereas the Pens had a slightly better PK during the regular season (82.7 vs 80.6%). Ordinarily, I would give the advantage to the Pens but. . .
. . .There’s the Varlamov conundrum. The Caps’ penalty killers allowed 6 goals in 54 opportunities in all of Varlamov’s games, regular season and playoffs combined (and one of those was a 5-on-3 at the tail end of Game 6 when the outcome was already decided). That’s a PK% of 89. That’s pretty goddamn good. For comparison’s sake, Theodore gave up 2 PP goals on 7 opportunities in Game 1. Now, usual small-sample-size caveats apply, so I call it a push.
Letang is 22. He has averaged 18:30 per game in ice-time this playoffs, and almost 1/3 of that is on the PP (5:03/g), while almost none of that is on the PK ( 0:44 TOTAL). There’s a reason for that. The guy is really talented (offhand, I’d put him a notch or two below Green because I don’t think he has Green’s shot, and he’s smaller, but that’s still very good), but he’s really young. He’s a less-offensively capable version of what Green was last year. As a matter of fact, the Pens thought so highly of him, they benched him in favor of Phillipe Boucher for Game 5.
Now, I know that I compared him to Poti, but I stand by what I said. Poti is leading all players in PPG For/60 in the playoffs (Yes, S-S-S), but Poti plays frequently in all three phases of the game, which Letang does not (yet).
As for the remainder of the defensemen on both teams, I think Orpik stands out for his size, hitting and shot-blocking abilities. After that, however, I think the drop-off to the remaining Pens D-men is pretty steep. Overall, I called the 3-6 defensemen a wash, with the exception of Brian Pothier. Pothier, in my opinion, has an ability to skate and move the puck that the Pens don’t really have in their bottom-4. Scuderi, Gill, and Eaton/Boucher are all decent/serviceable defensemen, but none of them are puck-movers (with the possible exception of Boucher, but he’s a shell of his former self). Hal Gill knows one move with the puck, off the glass and out. Scuderi and Eaton are better, but not by a ton. Orpik is many good things, but the transition game isn’t his forte in my opinion.
Maybe I’m underestimating, but when I look at this Penguins team, I see a team that lost A TON of very talented, very valuable players in the offseason. Yes, they brought in Guerin and Kunitz, but they gave up Whitney to get the latter, putting more pressure on guys like Letang to step-up their game.
If I think I made an underestimation, it’s in the goaltending department. Fleury is talented, so maybe it’s a case of my having watched him only on rough nights, and I misspoke about him getting benched this year (I’ll edit that out of the post shortly). Also, it’s possible that recent performance has skewed my assessment of Varlamov, but with little else to go on, I’m summing up his Super-League track record and his performance thus far and I’m a hell of a lot more optimistic than I was when Theo was in net.
As for the intangibles, those are always open for interpretation – that’s why they’re intangible. I will say this though: home-ice will be an advantage, the extra rest due to the TV schedule helps the Caps more than the Pens, the Pens loss (?) of Sykora hurts, and I’m not entirely willing to simply write off the Pens’ early-season performance as an aberration caused by Gonchar’s injury. Yes, they were hot down the stretch, but the Devils were hot in March and we all saw where that got them.
As a final point, I think that we Caps fans need to get past our demons regarding the Penguins. Maybe that’s easier said than done; maybe it requires a playoff series victory to cleanse the palate; maybe it will only come when we’re parading the Cup down 7th St. But it’s gotta come eventually. Maybe we should change our name to the Leopard Seals – they eat penguins, right?
Look I totally agree they lost talent in Whitney, Armstrong, Malone, and Hossa leaving, but Kunitz and Guerin aren’t exactly bad replacements. They have given Sid what he has needed for years, legit threats on either side of him. I think those two get underestimated because they aren’t flashy. The one loss that the Pens have not replaced and may never is Armstrong. That kid has heart that quite frankly no one else on the Pens had or has.
I think that we Caps fans need to get past our demons regarding the Penguins.
I do agree with you wholeheartedly on this point.
Payback is coming, if not this year then sooner rather than later.
The argument some folks bring up of the mental block is null and void. None of the current Caps ever played against the Pens in a playoff series before. The fans on both sides love to talk about the past, the players could care less.
I concur on everything, except I’d say Hossa and Malone were the bigger losses. It’s simply baffling that a team with Gonchar, Crosby and Malkin (and Letang) should not be better on the PP, and I think losing those two is a big part of that.
Armstrong has tons of heart, no doubt, but you can’t throw a rock in Canada without hitting a kid who’d gladly run through a brick wall for a chance to play in the NHL.
Well not having Gonchar for 2/3 of the season certainly didn’t help the PP numbers. I’m too lazy right now, but I’d be curious to see the pre/post Gonchar PP splits.
For sure, but it doesn’t explain the 12.5% they put up against the Flyers in the first round. That’s with Guerin, Kunitz and Gonchar all on board. The Flyers had a PK% of 83% over the course of the season, so clearly one side either under or over-performed.
Interestingly, the Rangers’ PK% during the regular season was 87.8. The Caps’ PP% against the Rangers was 18.2%. Interesting coincidence…
I expect their PP to be better against our PK. I like our forwards on the PK, but our D-men tend to struggle to gain control of the puck along the boards and when they do gain control they have trouble clearing it. Forwards have looked better since Gordo returned and playoffs started. I really like Baks and his active stick. However, playing the Rags may have created a mirage.
D’ohboy trust me I hope after the series is over I’m able to concede that your expectations for the special teams play of both teams were right.
The splits were 16.2% before Gonchar’s return and 19.2% after.
However, the stat I think is most important is in the Pens final 12 games of the year their PP was scoring at a rate of 24.6%. To me that number is more of a true representation. By then Kunitz and Guerin had some games to become acclimated and the coaching staff had time to implement what they wanted in terms of personnel and scheme.
Consensus from the gaming world is that this series is a pickem with maybe Washington laying 6/5 for the home ice. Tough matchup and I don’t fathom how any Caps fan of more than a couple years could be super confident unless you are deluding yourself – which, trust me, is a-okay. I might try some of the same. Reminds me of a friend who was a Wings fan, it didn’t matter how good they were, the Avalanche always made him uneasy. I would be thrilled to be completely wrong and you to be completely right.
I think it’s pretty clear that the Top 4 teams in the East right now are BOS-CAR-WAS-PIT in no particular order. Ok – CAR is 4th. :-)
Russian Machine Never Breaks
First, thanks for reading my gargantuan post. :)
I’m with you. I got a sinking feeling in my stomach watching the end of the Car-NJ game.
However, the more I think about it, the more I’m unafraid of this matchup. This is a different Caps team and a different Pens team.
It’s funny that you mention your friend and his fear of the Avs. In my other life, I’m an Avs fan, and I always feared/hated the Wings.
Anyhow, I think we all need to step back a little and assess this series based on the two teams that are playing, not the two franchises and their interactions over the course of several decades.

by 


































