Breaking Down Two Breakdowns
In the span of 1:39 during Wednesday night's second period, the New York Rangers scored as many power-play goals - two - as they had in the last seven games of the regular season. How did the worst extra man unit in the Eastern Conference manage that feat? Let's take a look.
With John Erskine sitting in the box for a hi-sticking penalty drawn by Sean Avery, the Rangers' Nik Antropov broke a 1-1 tie:
The Caps had killed the first minute and change of the disadvantage, but the penalty killing forwards that were on the ice when the goal was scored - Tomas Fleischmann and David Steckel - had been out for more than a minute when the lamp was lit, which is a long shift on the kill. More importantly, however, Fleischmann was stickless, leaving an exhausted Steckel to try to take away the shot from the point man on his side (Scott Gomez), cheat a bit towards the other point man (Paul Mara) and defend Antropov at the boards (sidenote: if Antro wants to play out there all power play long, I'm pretty sure the Caps are fine with that - better than on top of the crease). Needless to say, he didn't do it effectively, as Gomez walked Steckel well into the middle of the ice, tossed a pass over to Antropov who Steckel was too gassed to defend and who froze Shaone Morrisonn with a fake shot before taking his sweet time and zipping one past Jose Theodore. Fleischmann saw the play developing and tried to get out on Antropov, but ran into a Ryan Callahan pick en route.
Whether or not the shot was stoppable, the confluence of events leading up to the shot itself - an unnecessary penalty (to a good penalty killer at that), a long shift for a pair of forwards (one of whom lost/broke his stick and the other of whom may have over-committed on the play), and a blueliner who bit on a fake - should be considered as well, as, perhaps, the question of whether or not Flash should even be killing penalties at all (the fact that he had the worst GAON/60 of any Caps forward at 4-on-5 sure argues that he shouldn't be).
But goals happen (yes, even with the Rangers on the power-play), and as cliché as it may be, the first shift after allowing a goal - especially a tie-breaking tally at home in the playoffs - then becomes critically important. Unfortunately for the Caps, that shift lasted 32 seconds before Sergei Fedorov (he of the three Stanley Cups and $4 million contract) threw the puck off the rink for a two-minute delay of game penalty. What followed was Markus Naslund's 14th career playoff goal:
The breakdown on this one is even simpler than the last: you don't go for the long second-peroid line change when the guy with the third-most playoff power play assists per game since the lockout has the puck at his own blueline. Granted, the two Caps forwards who went for the change - Steckel and Boyd Gordon - had been on the ice since the beginning of the kill a minute earlier (see above), but if that puck's not deep, those guys can't leave the ice, at least not together (perhaps token pressure from Gordon would have driven Gomez behind his net and allowed for a cleaner, sequential change). The result was that neither of the two oncoming Caps forwards (Matt Bradley or Brooks Laich) was able to get across the ice in time to impact Naslund in any way (and neither of them skated hard to the puck), and Tom Poti may still be backing up on the play. Killing penalties is hard enough without giving the opponent chances in transition - this was a bad goal, and a bad team goal.
In the playoffs, mistakes are magnified, and mental acuity critical. No one doubted that the Caps physical effort that was at times lacking throughout the regular season's last month would re-appear once the puck dropped on the second season; focus, however, is a tougher switch to flip and perhaps a small lack thereof was what we saw on that second goal.
Two power-play goals in a buck-thirty-nine, and that's how it happened. Perhaps the Rangers have filled their quota for these seven games, as they've now matched their output from the previous seven. More likely, however, the Caps penalty kill - from the forwards to the goalie - will need to get better in a hurry.
[Ed. note: This video session is dedicated to the late John Madden, who left us unexpectedly yesterday. Wait, what? He just quit his job? Nevermind. Bam!]
95 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If I recall correctly, Fleischmann is without a stick because he has given his to Morrisonn, who needed a stick after his was broken by a slash from Dubinsky. A bad break in more ways than one.
Good call – I didn’t remember how he became stickless (wish these clips were a little longer on the front-end…)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
My recollection was that Morrisonn broke his stick on a clearing attempt, rather than having it slashed by another player.
quote from boudreau on ci
They scored their second goal when they slashed Morrisonn’s stick and broke it.
by mechanicsville on Apr 17, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
we can just add it to the list of non-calls from wednesday night!
by mechanicsville on Apr 17, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
A related question: How many sticks did the Caps break in that game? Seem to recall Semin breaking a stick on an attempted snap, not slap shot. Composite sticks are light and probably increase speed of shots, but they seem to shatter at the slightest provocation.
I can recall two Capitals’ sticks broken by slashes—Ovechkin’s, skating through the neutral zone, and Morrisonn’s, on a penalty kill. Ovechkin’s drew a penalty, Morrisonn’s did not. Given a choice, I would have taken it the other way around.
If you think about the fact that those sticks normally cost about $170.00 bucks to over $200.00 a piece, how much money do think that is for the entire year for the Capitals breaking sticks?
Not nearly enough for them to consider forcing a change back to wood. Not to mention, I’d be shocked if Ovechkin/Semin/Green/Backstrom didn’t get their sticks for free from Easton/Nike-Bauer/etc.
I don’t think there’s any monetary concern here.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions
No idea, but I remember seeing a couple of years ago that the Thrashers’ stick budget for the season was something like $300,000.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I don’t think they all do, though. Unless you mean the players get them free, not the team.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
My understanding is that all the players get their sticks for free from the companies, even the ones who aren’t big names, with the logic being that even if guys like Gordon, Bradley, and Schultz are playing with your company’s stick people might see it and go “wow, look how man guys are using [x], I gotta look in to that”.
It’s logical, but, like JP said, I, too, seem to remember seeing something along the lines of a specific budget for sticks. Now that I think about it, it actually might be in reference to Bondra, as he broke a ton of (wood) sticks while he was here. But that was so long ago, that may have changed universally.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
That wouldn’t surprise me. There’s a lot more money to be made now that people will pay over $200 for a top tier stick, as opposed to the $50 or less ten year ago.
Speaking of sticks...
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/23861-Justin-Bournes-Blog-The-pros-of-rec-hockey.html
There’s a blogger from THN, former college hockey player and son of an islanders hall of famer who commented about how he got lots of free stuff..
If a college hockey player gets free sticks I can only imagine that the people on the cap’s do also…
Playing hockey for a living offers some perks recreational players aren’t afforded – namely, free gear. My senior year of college included 38 games and two dozen Nike/Bauer Vapor XXX sticks, which at the time retailed for just less than the cost of a human baby on the black market.
Along with the sticks, I got two new pairs of custom Bauer skates to account for That-Thing-That-Cannot-Be-Explained on my heels. It’s a good deal.
Junior, college and pro hockey allowed me to be the best buddy a rec player could have, enabling my closest friends to pilfer what they could from the pseudo sports store I assembled in my garage.
The Dubinsky back-breaker also was a special teams failure. It came as the Caps were transitioning out of the power play and into even strength. Another sloppy change, if I recall correctly.
Naslund’s goal was from a little further out than I recalled.
I agree with the diagnosis of mental lapses. I’ll particularly be interested in AO’s ice time during the first, and the length of his and Green(e)’s power-play shifts. Both those numbers have to come down from what they were in Game 1.
Managing Minutes
I posted this yesterday late in the thread, and thought it was worth putting here, too…
Upon looking at the TOI after the game, I don’t understand why #52 is on the ice for 30’ and #8 with 26’?! Between playning all 2’ of pk’s and double shifting, I wonder if there was any gas let in the tank for the 2nd half of the 3rd period. Clearly, Schultz got undressed by Dubinsky, but Greenie looked plum tuckered out trying to cover for his partner. And I don’t recall Ovie having a SOG in the final 10’ of the 3rd period.
by mechanicsville on Apr 17, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Long shifts seemed to be a pattern in game 1, especially for our top guys and late in the game. What’s gonna happen if there is overtime? This worries me a bit.
The keyboard is mightier.
On the plus side (maybe), the way this team plays the game, lengthy OTs are unlikely, imo.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
if that goes down, rink readers are invited to stay at my place in lakeview. holy cow.
by Natty Bumppo on Apr 17, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I can’t prove this, but I do vaguely remember Bruce shortening Ovie’s shifts in the last three games of the Flyers-series. It seemed to help a lot, and I think that maybe he overdid it with certain players in game 1, mainly Ovie and Greeen. I feel that one of the pieces to the puzzle on the road towards Lord Stanley is about rest and fatigue.
Plus I can remember a couple of weeks ago against Tampa Bay when they double-shifted Ovechkin. It didn’t seem to be as effective because he went pointless—not to say that he didn’t get chances, however.
When the PK comes on the ice, especially in the second period, they’ve got to skate onto the ice. Matt Bradley just lazed his way into the D-zone there. Geez.
So did Brooks. I’m sure that Gomez’s eyes lit up when he saw Gordo and Steckel going to the bench and he was still at the faceoff dot. I actually remember thinking “uh-oh” when I saw that play developing.
Line changes have been an issue all year. Slow and miss timed, don’t know if it’s more than other teams but they seem to bite the Caps in the ass more often.
never let the truth get in the way of a good story
by toymechanic on Apr 17, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Great breakdown. Being sloppy on line changes has popped up from time to time this year, I think that’s correctable and will be addressed. I didn’t like the effort getting off the ice or on. The players have to realize that was going to have to be a lightning quick change. Gomez definitely recognized it, you can see him look at Gordo’s back and take off, though the VC ice ALMOST got him on when he took off.
Also just pure speculation but with a two day lay off- post Wednesday make BB think he could push his front line guys more?
Completely unrelated at the end of the Gomez goal video check out the little girl on the glass, priceless expression sums up Caps nation at that moment.
The good thing about this is that I’m sure BB took plenty of time showing them exactly what happened on each goal. They will learn from their mistakes, and they will take Game 2.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions
Inside information? No, but — I just have this FEELING, deep inside me, that BB will take that video, and, light shining down from heaven, will make his team understand just what needs to be done. So sayeth I.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Nothing wrong with a little faith right now.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
And Tarik’s reporting that Schultz is hurt. Think it might be from the spill he took trying to get back on Dubinsky?
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 10:44 AM EDT reply actions
He played one short shift after that, so I think that’s a good guess.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Shit, that probably means ankle or achilles, even, considering the way he fell. He needs to heal up, quick!
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Or groin. Or spleen. Or elbow. Or pride.
He fell. No use speculating on what he might have hurt.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
But it’s more fun playing doctor than waiting for the doctor. I doubt his pride would cause him to miss practice, though…
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m Bill Frist and I approve of this message.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Hey man, Bill Frist represents the fine people of the state of Tennessee with class and dignity.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, Bill Frist will never stop. I mean, whaaaat?
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
So a short, normal length shift, then. Hmm, for that amount of time, it wouldn’t seem to be ankle or tendon…
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
No, I mean that you don’t generally skate a full (if short) shift on something like that – you know immediately.
And besides, I’ve already made my excuses for speculating!
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
“Now when you’re team breaks down, it usually leads to goals, and when the other teams scores the most goals, they usually win” /end Madden tribute
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
“To win a game, you have to have the most points — this is the point that needs to be driven home!”
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
the morons at Caps Insider and the Caps Message board are having champagne toasts to Schultz’s injury.
I noticed. Is the readership over there THAT much different than over here? I’m a little surprised at that, really.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
You should be. The content here is about ten times smarter. And we have enforcers.
by TylerG on Apr 17, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Comment of the day.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
The “smartness” isn’t what I was concerned about — Japer’s is a place for thought and analysis, Tarik is news. That’s more what I’m surprised about, that the outlet for news is such a breeding ground for bullshit like that.
I guess I’m just being naive.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay, that was really naive sounding.
I think I meant that I was surprised that Tarik specifically is a strange place for it, as opposed to the message boards and wherever.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
Message boards and CI are places where homerism blinds rationalism, and the posters tend to not bring any factual support. Here, most of the time (With myself as one of the biggest people not following the rule), stats, visuals, and many other things are brought up – and controversy is discussed, not bashed.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
I think we’re educated homers out in blogosphere-land.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Most of them probably haven’t been around long enough to know that Pothier = Schultz when it comes to whipping boy.
I can’t see how this is a good thing for the caps and it certainly isn’t going to be a game changer.
At this point, I’d rather Pothier than Schultz – but shame if it’s done by injury.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s pointless, but speculation is fun :) (Maybe it isn’t pointless afterall)
Who knows, it might be an injury that he has to ask about… “Hey GMGM, do I have a cold, or a lower body injury today.”
Him being injured allows for the Caps to replace him with someone from Hershey without using another of the 4 call-ups if someone else gets dinged up.
In all honesty, did not think about that. I thought, though, that after the season ended we could call up and send down as we damn well pleased.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow. That’s kind of stupid. Premier league should get the long end of the stick, not the minor.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The CBA does not allow for that sort of B.S. If the team says a player is injured, then there’s a whole TON of stuff they have to do in order to prove it. The team doctor will NOT make up an “injury” just to get a disliked / maligned player off the ice for a game or three, and I am really getting annoyed at people who imply that the team doctor would do such a thing.
by IRockTheRed on Apr 17, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Relax. I’m not saying that they are making up an injury to get him off the ice because the player sucks.
My point is that if he was injured, tweaked a knee say, and couldn’t finish the game, the seriousness of the injury might be played up in order to leave options open. We have seen it on several occasions (Drury not two days ago) where teams/players are cagey about injuries for all sorts of reasons.
I’m pretty sure I’ll ban the first person who openly cheers an injury on this site.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 17, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I’m pretty sure I’ll stand up and applaud when you do. :)
by IRockTheRed on Apr 17, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
You can always just follow the “dramatic clap” signs they hold up at games as a reference.
"I recognize [Schultz] is a young defenseman and is going to make mistakes. He probably makes fewer mistakes than some of the others, like Erskine. But he's a coward, plain and simple, which is why I will continue to boo him."
by Bald Pollack on Apr 17, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Nah. No one should enjoy seeing someone else in pain, especially when that “pain” just means more boning of Gisele.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Yeah I was mostly kidding. I don’t wish injuries on players, but I will admit that Tom Brady going down didn’t ruin that Sunday for me. It made it easier to not feel bad for TB knowing that he was a) not going to lose any quality of life and b) was going to spend the next year rehabbing, collecting pay checks, and boning Gisele.
ignorance is bliss
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions
that was in reply to Sombrero’s comment. The CMB is a pretty awful place for Schultz talk.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed, I logged in today for the first time in months. It reminded me why I have stayed away.
by Sombrero Guy on Apr 17, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, as I just said up above, I was a little surprised. I don’t believe I’ll be posting there, again.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 17, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
hah Tyler’s joke about there being enforcers at Japers Rink was both funny and accurate. Tarik, Katie and the WaPo crew are not going to call out people for typing in something stupid. Readers might, but readers don’t hold the same clout as the person running the show.
I think its just a reality of the team becoming more popular – more posters mean lower common denominator as more new fans haven’t followed the team or know the game as well.
I remember when Tarik first started the blog and it was a quiet new place to get away from the Caps message board negativity. It was great for that last year, but now there’s no difference between the two.
It’s a true story. I posted at CI for 2 years after the lockout.
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s really the problem with anywhere that’s for profit, be it ESPN, Fox Sports, TSN, WaPo. They’re put in an awkward position because they don’t want to dissuade people from reading or get the reputation for banning people because total traffic is a huge thing for them.
What I just try to remember is that the people who are always angry, condescending know-it-alls are always the loudest and that for everyone person who has the “OMG Schultz sucks 4 real! i hate him its good he’s hurt because the team is way better without him! and alzner is the best!!!!11one” reaction, there are twenty people who say the play and went, “Oh, man, that sucks, I feel so bad for him. Better luck next time, Schultz”.
What about the people who think Schultz is mediocre, but are disappointed he’s hurt, and don’t think we’ve seen enough of Alzner to bring him up for the playoffs, and we wish we ran for profit?
I'm so sick and tired of the refs explaining the calls like this is the NFL.
by Whiter Mage on Apr 17, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
OK, I’ve officially had it with CI. This is the place to be. :-) I’ll read it for news, but I’m ignoring the comments.
@jp – What do you think about the first (first?) goal – the one with the flagrant interference non-call where they were smacking Flash (was it Flash?) around with the puck halfway across the ice and nowhere near him, and the referees ignored it.
Do you expect that they’ll call the next game tighter?
The referees for the game haven’t been announced yet, but I do know who the playoff refs will be for Round 1:
Referees: Paul Devorski, Eric Furlatt, Mike Hasenfratz, Dave Jackson, Marc Joannette, Dennis Larue, Chris Lee, Mike Leggo, Wes McCauley, Bill McCreary, Brad Meier, Dan O’Halloran, Dan O’Rourke, Tim Peel, Kevin Pollock, Chris Rooney, Kelly Sutherland, Don Van Massenhoven, Ian Walsh and Brad Watson
Linesmen: Derek Amell, Steve Barton, Lonnie Cameron, Mike Cvik, Greg Devorski, Scott Driscoll, Shane Heyer, Brad Kovachik, Brad Lazarowich, Steve Miller, Jean Morin, Brian Murphy, Jonny Murray, Thor Nelson, Tim Nowak, Pierre Racicot, Tony Sericolo, Jay Sharrers, Mark Shewchyk and Mark Wheler
people actually have discussions in TEB’s comments?
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 17, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions





































