Pest Control
"I had him for one week. It felt like a year." - Bruce Boudreau on his experience with Sean Avery.
You probably already know you don't like Sean Avery. What you might not know if just how much you're going to hate him by the end of this month.
Avery, who seems to revel in being the League's most hated player, is willing to indulge any pet peeve. He runs his mouth both on and off the ice, he makes life difficult for goaltenders, he dives (on a regular basis, no less), he gets in stick work after the whistle, he throws questionable hits, he declines to answer the bell when called out, instead opting to goad an opponent in to a penalty or, apparently, retaliate by squirting Gatorade on the opponent's bench.
Ostensibly the story of this series will be the Capitals high-powered offense against Henrik Lundqvist, and with good cause - Lundqvist is one of the league's most efficient goalies in both save percentage and goals against average, and possesses the ability to steal games, something his thirteen shutouts over the last two seasons attests to. But there's reason to think the Capitals can solve Lundqvist: this season Lundqvist's .882 save percentage and 3.57 goals against average against the Capitals are pretty pedestrian and the worst the netminder posted against any team he'd seen more than once, save for Montreal. In addition, Lundqvist's 11-12/2.57/.907 career playoff stat line isn't all that impressive, especially considering that it drops to 7-12/2.78/.901 outside of the team's 2007 series against Atlanta, a series that was dominated by Lundqvist's teammates more than the netminder himself.
It was against Atlanta that Avery, arguably his team's best player in the series, proved himself as a playoff performer. His five points (one goal) and 19 shots on goal undoubtedly helped, but Avery's biggest contribution was seen in the play Thrashers, not the Rangers. While the Rangers went about the business of playing hockey, the Thrashers grew increasingly preoccupied with Avery's antics. By the second period of game two Thrashers' star Ilya Kovalchuk (who would later fight Avery) was more interested in dealing with Avery than helping his team create offense, a preoccupation that played a part in his unimpressive production (one goal, one assist) in the series.
The Capitals may be better equipped to deal with Avery than most teams. After a win against the Rangers last season Boudreau explained his team's strategy against Avery, saying, "We told everybody to ignore him. He's very effective at what he does. There were a couple of times when he was yelling in between the glass. When everybody's staring straight out and not paying attention, what's the use of yelling? So he stopped doing it." The advantage of this strategy is that it's simple - just don't engage Avery and he loses his effectiveness. The disadvantage of this strategy, unfortunately, is that it's simple. Bruce Boudreau, for all his coaching acumen, is not the first person to realize that Avery's effectiveness is largely contingent on how opponent responds to him. Yet Avery still manages to get under the skin of opponents on a regular basis.
While it'd be nice to be able to say the Capitals should have no problem avoiding engaging Avery, it'd be too optimistic of an outlook. Too many Capitals have had the tendency to take bad retaliation and frustration penalties this season, and it's not a problem limited for just one or two guys. That plays into Avery's hands too because, for all the attention the Ovechkin/Avery match-up is getting, he'll be more than happy to get any Capitals player off his game. Even the more optimistic outlooks, like Boudreau's "Ovie doesn't doesn't do something silly. If you know Ovie, he just takes numbers, and the next time you touch the puck he's a runaway truck" carry the potential to create significant problems for the Caps.
The Capitals do have one thing clearly working their favor when it comes to dealing with Avery (and no, it's not Donald Brashear, who's more likely to play into Avery's hands than deter him from doing anything): the referees. Make no mistake about it - Sean Avery is a marked man in the eyes of officials for his tendency to run his mouth, style of play, and the frequency with which he makes the referee's job more difficult than it already is. Avery's reputation is fairly long-standing, but since his return to the Rangers' lineup the animosity directed his way by officials has come often and more blatently. In a late season game against the Devils Avery was given two minutes for being ragdolled by New Jersey's David Clarkson, and there are those who think the two minutes given to Avery for this altercation with Boston's Tim Thomas was based on part on his reputation since officials appeared not to see the initial contact of Avery's stick on Thomas' helmet. The bottom line is that Avery's reputation is now such that in any altercation between Avery and another player, the guy who isn't Avery's going to the benefit of the doubt every time.
What that means for the Capitals is that they'll be able to get a little more frustrated than they should with Avery and still be able to get away with it which is, of course, good news. As long as the Caps don't allow themselves to become completely consumed with Avery they be able to prevent him from becoming a major factor in the series. But then, that too is something easier said than done.
80 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I dunno, Semin can bongo pretty hard — Staal can attest to that!
Seriously, that’s probably true. Ovechkin doesn’t frustrate easily, and Avery’d probably come out the worse for it if he ever had his head down…
I’m hoping Semin comes out in style, though, akin to last year. He was a dominant, positive force the entire series, and I think he will be again. Everyone’s too excited to beat the holy shit out of the Rags for them to lose focus.
That said, I kinda hope there isn’t a sweep. I can just see a Game 4 victory spelling certain doom in the form of complacency.
by DrinkingPartner on Apr 14, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the target is certain to be Theo. While Semin might be vulnerable (I kind of doubt it, I expect him to be dominant), if the Rags are deploying their main pest to neutralize the Caps’ #2 goal scoring forward, the Caps have already won, IMO.
And I will take (and pray for) a sweep any day. If the Caps can shake off the complacency of the last month to sweep the Rags, getting up for round 2 is not going to be a problem.
I just think Semin gets bothered easily by the ticky-tacky stuff (Det eez Nut Rooshian Huckee), and if Avery can translate that into Ranger power plays that could be pretty valuable. THEN he can do his little wavey game in front of Theo.
Flip side though, Semin got ticked off in the playoffs last year and played out of his mind. So Avery might just be picking his poison.
The keyboard is mightier.
Based on last year’s playoffs, I sort of expect Semin to be the most focused player on the team when the puck drops. He really elevated his game last year and is such an enigma I can imagine him tuning out all kinds of distractions.
Truth be told, I have less confidence in Theo than most of the Caps players to be able to tune out Avery’s antics. He will have to find a way, but he can definitely be rattled. That’s probably my biggest concern going into this series, though not necessarily just from agitation by Avery. Torts is a no-holds-barred coach, so I fully expect the Rags to go after Theo.
I guarantee you that after this series we will all loathe Sean Avery with a depth of feeling generally reserved for the likes of Bin Laden, Hitler, and light beer.
However, I’m feeling fairly confident that he’s not going to upset the entire apple cart for the Caps. They’ve taken a bunch of HHT penalties, as we all know. But they’re generally the lazy kind as opposed to the retaliatory kind, or so at least is my general impression.
If I had to pick one candidate to get undone by Avery, it would be Semin. AO will probably be too focused on where his next goal is coming from, and I fully expect that the refs will come down hard on Avery for anything extracurricular aimed AO’s way by Avery. Semin probably doesn’t get that protection, is a bit of a head case to start with, and will lose his focus.
But I suspect the League does NOT want Avery to be the story, and has communicated that to the refs, who will keep him from getting it all going.
They just have to make sure and ignore the dog when it wants attention. The best way to curb a behavior is to ignore it. I’m hoping this won’t be as big of a story as we are all making it.
by sincitycapsfan on Apr 14, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions
I think this is a much bigger story to the media than it is to the team. Like I’ve said before, if you’re game planning around Avery, he’s already won (and, by extension, the terrorists have already won as well).
I don’t think the Caps are too concerned about him beyond what he can do as a hockey player.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
The best way to combat Avery’s immaturity is by being mature. The Caps are so young that it will be very important for guys like Feds, Nyls (?), Brash, Bruce to keep a close eye on the antics and make sure that when Ovie, Semin, Theo are the target of Avery they get a whisper in the ear to keep calm and just do your talking with your play.
For a team like the Caps that has a history of taking undisciplined penalties, someone like Avery could be big trouble. It’s easy to say ignore him, but the reality is he’s a guy who’s turned pissing opposing players off into a science. The Caps have to turn a deaf ear to everything he says and skate away from his after the play hits. Most importantly, they have to lobby the refs to keep an eye on him every second of the game. My guess is the league is interested in a possible Ovechkin-Crosby matchup, so they’ll instruct their refs to not let Avery get away with much. The only saving grace ia that if they do take stupid penalties, the Rangers are one of the least likely team in the playoffs to make them pay.
For a team like the Caps that has a history of taking undisciplined penalties, someone like Avery could be big trouble.
But most of the Caps’ discipline problems have resulted in penalties of laziness, not aggression – seldom have they been goaded into taking bad penalties.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I totally agree about that.
I am completely guessing here, but just by gut-feel, I’d say the Caps have very few retaliation minors (slashing, cross-checking, boarding, spearing, instigation) compared to the HHT variety.
Anyone have numbers to support that?
Back off, Yoshie – DMG’s spoken for. :)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Me, myself and the entire non-Ranger world
are rooting for Ovie to catch him with his head down. epic pain.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Someone get him a pair of custom Bruno Magli skates and he’ll have his head down admiring them all night.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Naw
He picked that up during the OJ trial.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
I would never wear those ugly ass shoes!
by Scott in Shaw on Apr 14, 2009 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
you bet. With Avery, it is about initiating the contact and letting him get caught retaliating. Just like anyone else, if he’s getting checked hard and clean every shift, forced to work hard on D, he will wear down and be less effective.
The AO-Avery matchup is totally overblown. He’s gonna bait everyone.
from the house that Red Jesus built
by bigonetimer on Apr 14, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Is he known for retaliating? Take a look at the ragdolling above… I’ve always seen him as an instigator rather than a goon.
Retaliating does not necessarily equate to being a goon. I think the implication is that if you deal with him like one is supposed to in the sport of hockey…hit him hard and clean…that he gets upset…and retaliates with a penalty.
Maybe goon was the wrong word. I think of Avery as being good at not reacting to being hit or being yelled at etc. He initiates that and then expects to have his actions be answered in some way (usually with a poor penalty). If Ovie levels him, I don’t see Avery immediately taking a swing, but instead he’ll start talking/change his approach, or move on to an easier, but equally important target.
I expect Green to be a target of Avery’s. Green got thrown off his game by Jarkko Ruutu, a man who is 1/3rd the agitator Avery is. Plus, when Green is ineffective, the Caps offense feels it.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 14, 2009 12:19 PM EDT reply actions
That’s a great call, and I was just about to say that I’m not nearly as worried about AO (or Semin or Backstrom) getting rattled as I am about the D, because Avery – the hockey player, not the sideshow – is a lethal forechecker, and the Caps have guys on the backend who don’t necessarily handle the pressure all that well.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I have Avery pegged at a Category 3 Avery Attack on Green.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 14, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry to post a link in a great post (not trying to hi-jack DMG!) but for the sake of education.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 14, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Funny.
I think Cat 3 is probably too high.
As JP points out, he’s not a bad hockey player, though. If the Rangers can tilt the ice and get their forecheck going, they could make life tough on the Caps.
By Game 5 we may see the AES truly hit Category 3, although he’s currently riding a douche bag wind cycle down to Washington and should be at Category 1 strength by Wednesday.
I’ll be posting pre-game warnings ala the National Weather Service. If we gotta play against the guy, might as well have some fun with him.
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 14, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks, hope the other comments were nearly as good ;)
Capitals Kremlin the second line center of the Caps blogosphere.
by CapitalsKremlin on Apr 14, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s not hard. It’s like dealing with a bully: ignore him.
Eventually they’ll get bored (as Boudreau noted).
And eventually when you get the chance, whether because he has his head down or because Brashear grabs him at the end of the deciding game, you kill him.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
I don’t care what he does, as long as he doesn’t injure anyone.
I don’t think his reputation is to play dirty, right?
He’s no Darcy Tucker… (that one’s for PPP)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Wow, how quickly I had forgotten about Darcy Tucker…
Yes he was dirty, but he’d also back it up with his fists when called upon. Personally, I prefer dirty players who are willing to stick up for themselves…I loathe players like Avery and Briere (there I said it) who will nip and nip and nip and nip then hide behind other players or officials.
At the moment, I don’t hate Sean Avery. Then again, my favorite players growing up were Dale and Dino so I have a soft spot in my heart for skilled agitators.
However, I suspect I will hate Avery by, say, game two of this series.
Again, both Dale and Dino were always willing to drop the gloves to back up their actions. I have infinetly more respect for players like that.
by Yoshietree on Apr 14, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I rec’d because Dale wouldn’t back down from anyone, even if he know he was going to lose. That’s why he was our Captain.
Avery – has the potential to be that, but he’s a locker room cancer and he doesn’t drop the gloves. If he did, he wouldn’t be the most hated man in hockey (after bettman and the refs)
by vt caps fan on Apr 14, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, to play devil’s advocate to my own argument hockeyfights.com does list him as having fought several times…though since I’m at work (most video sites don’t load) I can’t confirm that they are truly fights.
http://www.hockeyfights.com/players/522
Maybe it’s just his reputation that makes me think he doesn’t drop the gloves.
Oh I do too, but both of those guys were hated by fans of other teams. I wasn’t making a direct comparison. In fact my only point was that I expect my hatred of Avery to increase 400% by this time next week.
by Sombrero Guy on Apr 14, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
slightly off topic, but frankly i thought he should have been suspended for that tim thomas thing…not that it was a suspension worthy offense per se, but he is clearly on a double (not-so) secret probation and he clearly meant to do it.
i know a diagnosed bi-polar person very well and i can tell you when they have a “relapse”, no matter how small an offense it might seem, you need to nip it in the bud immediately cause its only going to get worse.
I too am surprised there was no suspension, but the suspension decisions have frankly been pretty baffling lately.
I don’t know anything about Avery’s personal life, but he doesn’t strike me as bi-polar at all. In my book, he’s calculating, crude, and savvy. And a total punk, of course. But he doesn’t seem to lack self-control. He’s just an asshole.
look, i really dont want to belittle a serious medical condition by flaming the internet claiming a hockey player that many people do or don’t like, is or isn’t. But future playoff actions aside there is a pretty strong case he is…
he seeks attention, but handles it very poorly, often saying things which alienate him from even his closest peers. (calling george laraque a monkey, forcing Chelios to ask him to move out of Chelios’ house during the lockout, making comments (in fairness never proven) about Jason Blake’s Leukemia)
He defintely has delusions of grandeur (“my sloppy seconds” has the subtle implication that eliza cuthbert’s and rachel hunter’s previous relationship with him did, or should factor, into every future hockey player’s decision to date her.)
he has delusions of percusion: remember after his GARGANTUAN DIVE in LA he publicy critized the leagues officiating anyway.
He hit new york and, thanks to be excused from Dallas (his second NHL team dismissal) he was already the center of attention…and what happens when the attention on him starts to wane? tim thomas gets a whack on the head.
by luketheriault on Apr 14, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
There’s no doubt the guy’s self-centered and childish, but some of the stuff listed is a bit of stretch – for example, my understanding is that everyone involved, including Jason Blake, said that Avery’s comments had nothing to with his cancer diagnosis and when Avery filed a libel suit against the radio station claiming he did the studio retracted the claim. He also denies calling Laraque a monkey, for what it’s worth, but Laraque isn’t a guy I think Avery ever considered one of his closest peers.
I think reading his “sloppy seconds” comment as a delusion of grandeur is reading too much in to it. He wanted to piss off Phaneuf before the game between the two teams and I think it’s simple as that.
You seem to have followed his career more closely than me, so I defer to you. I just see a guy that wants the spotlight and will do something controversial to get it whenever he wants it. He’s egotistical, selfish, and attention-seeking, and the Rags are a good fit for him because his actions give the Rags something they need in a market that’s willing to tolerate his antics.
The sloppy seconds comment is a perfect example. He wanted to get attention and take a shot at Phaneuf in the media. He apparently gathered the reporters in the locker room around before making the comment, wanting the spotlight (and probably to intentionally hurt Cuthbert’s feelings). And if you look at what came out of that, you have to wonder if it’s exactly what Avery wanted – intense media attention, a ticket out of Dallas back to NY, and star treatment.
Does Avery Matter?
Is his pest stuff really relevant? The Caps have played against him before and he’s never really been a factor. Personally, I suspect the first guy on the Caps he might go at is Semin, doing an imitation of the “Fists O’ Fury”. The solution for Avery is to figure out which line he’s on and send out an appropriate opposing line. If he’s playing with the Rangers’ most effective forward (Callahan) send out the checking line and play defense.
I mean, the guy is a talented hockey player, but he’s not the Rangers best forward by any means. If they try to get him to match up with a particular player, then so what.
Now if a game gets to 5-0 Caps with 10 minutes to go….all bets are off, and Donald can send a message to him…
Let's go Caps!
Does Avery Matter? Is his pest stuff really relevant?
In a word, ‘yes’. Just go to YouTube and search his name – the guy is an expert at getting under people’s skin and taking him off their game. I don’t know if you caught any of the mentioned Thrashers/Rangers series, but his impact in that was huge. Ignoring him for one game is a tough enough challenge but ignoring him for 4+ is even harder and it’s something the Capitals need to be aware of.
The solution for Avery is to figure out which line he’s on and send out an appropriate opposing line. If he’s playing with the Rangers’ most effective forward (Callahan) send out the checking line and play defense.
Callahan doesn’t play on the Rangers first line and is probably their fifth most effective forward. Also, the Capitals don’t have a checking line.
Also – and this is my now-familiar refrain – if you’re game-planning for Avery, he’s already won.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Apr 14, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
In the past few weeks, Callahan has been playing like it matters, while Gomez has been doing nothing. Antropov hasn’t been all that good either, ditto for Avery, and others. Drury wasn’t playing well, but it turns out he was injured (he probably tried to play through it more than he should have…)
Callahan has been a force for the Rangers, and even if he’s not on the scoring line, the way he’s playing right now, he should be. I know other players may have better numbers, but from what I saw the past few weeks was Callahan all over the place.
As for a Caps checking line…if Bradley, Gordon and Steckel are in there together… that’s a checking line. Three good defensive forwards together.
Let's go Caps!
by MikeL-Pivonka on Apr 15, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not a fan of Sean Avery by any means but I do like the way he deals with “seekers”:
by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Apr 15, 2009 12:42 AM EDT reply actions

by 











































