Pick 'Em: Jurcina Or Erskine?
Now that Tom Poti has been officially cleared for an injury exemption, it's presumably only a matter of time before the Capitals recall someone from Hershey to take his place on the roster. We're thinking there's a good chance it's going to be Karl Alzner, as it's reasonable to think he has a realistic shot at helping the team in the playoffs and the team will want to see him against NHL competition to know for sure. If Alzner isn't quite ready now or a week or two from now, it's also possible Brian Pothier, who has been cleared for contact and is on a rehab stint in Hershey, could provide a late season boost. The bottom line is this: while it's not a sure thing, there's a pretty good chance another defenseman will be added to the Capitals roster between now and the end of the regular season and that it will result in a shuffling of the defensive depth chart. The question we ask today is, assuming that happens and the Capitals are in a situation where they have to dress either John Erskine or Milan Jurcina, but not both, who would you take?
There doesn't seem to me much to choose between the two. Erskine plays with more of an attitude, has the best 4-on-5 GAON/60 on the team and the second best 5-on-5 GAON/60 though he generally plays against weak competition, while Jurcina is a bigger body and has slightly higher offensive upside. Both are more than willing to hit, and each has seven games of NHL playoff experience from last spring, no more, no less.
Here's how they stack up by the numbers:
| John Erskine | Milan Jurcina | |
| Games | 38 | 65 |
| Goals | 0 | 3 |
| Assists | 3 | 10 |
| Points | 3 | 13 |
| Plus-Minus | 3 | 3 |
| PIM | 41 | 52 |
| Corsi | 6.6 | 7.5 |
| ES GF On/60 | 1.73 | 2.30 |
| ES GA On/60 | 1.52 | 2.05 |
| Qual. Comp. | -0.06 | -0.02 |
| Qual. Team. | 0.14 | -0.14 |
| ATOI | 16:06 | 16:33 |
160 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’ll kick this one off…
Erskine.
I’ve seen Juice make too many mental mistakes at bad times. Erskine, if managed properly (i.e. minutes and match ups) is effective.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I agree that the nature of the mistakes is key in this case. Jurcina makes mental errors; Erskine generally only makes mistakes when overwhelmed. See to it that Erskine doesn’t play against top notch opponents, and he’s fine.
Plus, he can kill penalties an area the team hasn’t been good in but finds themselves in a lot.
This is very difficult. For a while Alzner made Jurcina look like a viable defenseman.
When Erskine came back from an injury he was a beast for a game, possibly a game and a half.
I guess I’d rather see Erskine play because he’s going to be here for two more years and he’s the one worth investing in.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Erskine’s sucker pass last night, in his poor attempt to breakout, resulted in the Caps fumbling the puck all around near the slot and a goal being scored.
Juice has a much better shot and can play pretty well when paired with the right person.
I picked Juice.
Btw, 25 Rink Points (what?) to whomever best completes this sentence:
“Man, having to pick between Erskine and Jurcina is like…”
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
choosing your husband in prison.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Mar 6, 2009 1:46 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
…a dream come true for those of us who remember the days when three of the top four ice time guys were Josef Boumedienne, Joel Kwiatkowski, and Jason Doig.
(note: only applies when choosing who’s the sixth d-man and who sits)
choosing between watching Grey’s anatomy or Desperate Housewives
by Sombrero Guy on Mar 6, 2009 1:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
"Man, having to pick between Erskine and Jurcina is like…"
choosing between Katie or Tarik.
"Good crowd out there tonight, boys, let's really try to win this one."
by Bald Pollack on Mar 6, 2009 1:53 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
In the playoffs:
If Green and Poti are both healthy, I’ll take Erskine. With those two guys in the lineup taking 25+ minutes each, the sixth defenseman will get about 10 minutes of play and will be brought out mainly to “send a message.” Erskine’s better at dealing with limited time than Juice and he’s better at using his body.
If anybody is dinged up, I’ll take Jurcina. He can handle more minutes better than Erskine, and I feel like with Juice the more he plays the better he plays. I have the sense that his mental errors come up more often when he has to sit more and is out of rhythm with the game.
In the regular season, I’d like to see Green and Poti get some rest. So both Juice and Erskine should be rotating in there.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 1:58 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Speaking of D, my sources took this picture of Bruce trying some new training techniques on Schultz
http://buffetoblog.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/muppets-bunsen__beaker.jpg
Sergei Fedorov
Ron and Fez Noon to Three
by YvonLabresMoustache on Mar 6, 2009 2:05 PM EST reply actions
Wow. I’m surprised Jurcina has contacted his extended family so quickly to have them all vote.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
To be honest, I wonder if people are voting without reading the whole thing. It’s hard to imagine why Jurcina’s so far ahead when Erskine is one of the best guys on the team at preventing goals (statistically) and is a valuable penalty killer.
I’ll mention again that Erskine is signed for two more years, do we think Juice is coming back? I’d rather develop the guy we’re keeping.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
He’s an RFA, and I’d expect he gets a qualifying offer/arbitration. Now if he accepts a qualifying offer, that secures first refusal and if anyone signed him, that team would likely have to give up a 2nd round pick as compensation.
/cursory glancing through the CBA
"Good crowd out there tonight, boys, let's really try to win this one."
Is anyone really a valuable PKer on this team? Are we going to go from 77% to 74% if we lose Erskine? Not exactly a strong claim to say you are valuable on by far the teams worst unit.
Yes. Poti. And Steckel. And Gordon.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Oh yeah. Semin. Perhaps I should add a guy whose PKing I dedicated an entire post to. Duh…
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I agree that those 3 are our best PKers (besides AS), but our PK can be terrible with our without them. It’s hard for me to accept a MVPKer award on a team that cant kill 4/5. Relating it back to the current debate I just don’t think either Juice or Erskine are good enough on the PK to even have that factor really warrant in the discussion.
Am I the only one who thinks constantly shuffling the D-pairings hinders these guys more than helps them?
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Erskine. Like JP has said, I think that when Erskine is managed properly (minutes, pairings, matchups), he can be really effective. I can remember a few games this year where I’ve been astounded at how well Erskine has played compared to how ungainly and awful he was a few seasons ago. He’s a really good depth player.
Jurcina, on the other hand, needs to play a lot of minutes to be effective. Which means he needs to be a top pairing defenseman on a really bad team. He’s not going to help a team with Cup aspirations, because he’s just lost in limited minutes, and we can’t afford to give him enough minutes to get his game working. This is one instance where I think GMGM wasn’t quite right about upgrades. You can definitely get a better depth defenseman who knows his role and is comfortable with limited minutes than Jurcina.
Juice will turn 26 this year. Defensemen generally take longer to mature, and given Juice’s skills and body, it wouldn’t surprise me if his curve is longer than most. The best thing for Jurcina’s development would probably be to move to a team where he plays a solid 20 every night. Were that to happen, I think he’d become a very solid #3/4 when he hits his “prime” in two or three seasons.
I’m not sure the Caps are going to give him that opportunity. And it goes without saying that the Caps can do better with Green, Alzner, Carlson, etc. But I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Jurcina as a hockey player that a couple more years in the league won’t solve.
That said, the Caps are better with Green/Poti/Schultz/Pothier/Mo as their top 5 than they are with Juice in that mix. I hope they have the luxury of benching Juice in the playoffs.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure it’s the minutes per se that make Juice better. Aside from the obvious (you get more minutes when you are playing well) Juice’s best games as a Cap (aside from the initial 4 months when he had something to prove) have come when he has played with other guys that could a) handle pressure, b) move the puck, and c) handle 20 minutes a night. He was good when he played with Federov early in the year, and he was good when he played with Alzner in the middle of the year. He is not very consistent right now but his upside is way higher than Erskine’s. Does anyone know who has more puck-over-the-glass PIMs this year?
Are these guys really as bad as we are making them out to be? They are 5th and 6th defenders on a good team.
Absolutely!
Because you realize that there’s no way we’ll ever get out of the first round of the playoffs, that Schultz should go back to the minors, and we should trade everybody except Ovechkin and maybe Backstrom because everybody else just completely s*cks.
Oh, wait, nobody asked Tarik’s blog. …sorry.
hahahahah
With all the stupid penalties and curl in drag? He’s more trouble than he’s worth. :rolls eyes:
On a great team, Erskine is a very valuable #7. I don’t think Juice has a role on a great team right now in his career.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
My problem is the defensive corps as a whole appears to be regressing instead of progressing. The only thing that has improved year over year appears to be Green’s offensive skills. Juice and Mo are going backwards. Shultz and Big John appear to be in a holding pattern. I give Poti an incomplete due to injuries. Forwards and JT aren’t exactly helping the cause either. In summary – team defense is a mess in terms of consistency. There are nights when they look great and night’ when I cringe watching pucks constantly turned over in our own end.
I think Mo has hit his ceiling (2nd pairing D on his good nights, 3rd pairing on his bad ones), and agree with Gould that Juice needs a change of scenery. We’re just not in the business of project defensemen anymore, which is a good thing. Juice may or may not become a good NHL player someday. We just have the luxury of not having to be the laboratory for this experiment any longer.
Schultz will be fine. He’s 23 and is playing a lot of minutes. He’ll make mistakes, but his positives far outweigh his negatives. Plus he’s cheap.
Schultz at 23 is already better than Juice at 26. Green-Alzner-Carlson-Schultz as a top 4 in two years makes me drool. Especially if Jeff picks up a dozen or two pounds of muscle…
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, 2 years is probably too soon for Carlson to knock Poti to the 3rd pairing. But I hope they keep Poti around as long as he chooses to play. He can be our Chelios.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know, Carlson has been amazing this year but then again it does take defensemen longer to develop.
Let’s say this though: a Green-Alzner-Carlson-Schultz top five is going to be crazy good.
Four players on a top five? They’d better be crazy good :)
So:
Green – Alzner
Carlson – Schultz
Poti – Erskine?
Kronwall / Sloan / Collins?
I tend to like Poti/Schultz better myself.
No love for Godfrey? Or does his big shot become trade bait since Carlson and Green have our PP covered?
I don’t see Godfrey as ever a 20 minute per night NHL stalwart. He may be a power play specialist. Or if he does make it, he’ll take the Poti career path and be a goat in the first two cities he plays in. He’s just too far from being a complete player right now
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 10:36 PM EST up reply actions
He’s also very young, has raw talent, and judging by everything he says and his +/- development seems to be committed to learning to play in his own end. I don’t know if you can afford to have a 3rd pair PP specialist in the salary cap era but that would be one hell of a luxury to have. I think he ends up being traded simply because you can’t afford to pay 3 defensemen for the kind of point production Green, Carlson, and Godfrey are capable of and still keep our Forwards under contract.
From what I saw at training camp, Godfrey’s projecting to be a solid two-way defenseman rather than a PP specialist. People may have missed it because of Carlson’s surprising showing, but Godfrey showed a lot more than when he was drafted. Next season in Hershey will determine not only how he’s developed, but how quickly he’ll make the roster. Same for Dovgan.
Shouldn’t we be slightly worried about a slow development arc for the two “kids” as well? Are we going to make Juice and Erskine into solid 4/5 defensemen, let them go and face the same problem grooming new guys.
I know that comparing Carlson and Alzner to Juice and Erskine is not really a fair comparison, but humor me as I try to make a point.
I think Alzner will be fine next year, and they’ll probably manage his minutes to that effect. Carlson will probably get the Alzner treatment next year, where he starts in Hershey and gradually keeps getting called up.
I’m not positive Carlson isn’t in the CHL next year. The Caps know he is in good hands, it’s another year that his entry level contract isn’t running, and it’s another free roster spot for GMGM to play with. We have a big logjam of Dmen in the minors as is, Godfrey is in the ECHL, and next year both Seabrook and Finley are finished with their eligibility (CHL/NCAA) so they have to go to Hershey/CHL. I think it makes more sense to keep Carlson in London another year unless he proves that he has absolutely nothing left to learn there. I think he probably has something left to learn from the Hunters, at the very least learning to play in his own end.
John Carlson could probably play for Dale Hunter for the next decade and not learn everything Huntsy has to teach.
That said, I don’t know that I see him back in the OHL, but we shall see.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
You’re only allowed to have 50 players under contract, regardless of where they’re playing.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Gotta agree.
I’m enh on dumping Juice – I like his shot and his offense. Erskine screwed up hardcore last night on that second goal, but you guys bring some good arguments for keeping Erskine first. The one who drives me nuts is Mo – stupid penalties, miscues, clearing … yeesh. All that and more CAN BE YOURS for the low low price of $2 M a year … no thanks.
Juice seems to do well when he is changed up a lot. I understand that – I’m one of those people who thrives on change and I’m the same way.
If Mo is back on this team next year I’ll eat my own vomit. And I mean it this time.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
I don’t know that Shultz needs more muscle. He just needs to use what he already has to make actual physical contact with an opposing player more than once every 20 games. If he could ever get the combination of aggressiveness and confidence he’s lacking then he’s be a great top 4 guy.
LOL
All I can think about is Schultz coming back from a summer of ‘lifting’, a la Lattimer from “The Program”.
Starting Defense! Place at the table!!!

Russian Machine Never Breaks
Haven’t you been listening? Apparently you’re not a real hockey fan if you think Schultz sucks because he doesn’t hit. I read that somewhere recently…
by Scott in Shaw on Mar 6, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
More like if you think Schultz sucks because he doesn’t hit you’re spending time focusing on something that doesn’t really impact how effective he is as a defenseman.
My point is his lack of physicality is a result of his lack of aggressiveness overall. His positioning sucks at times because he doesn’t seem to have a mindset to react and attack as I like to say, whether it be the puck or the body. He seems to not trust his own instincts. The only person who looks more tentative is Juice when he’s paired with Erskine. Like all of our guys there are nights when I think Shultz has finally turned the corner and then the next game not so much.
Erskine
Because Eminger is nowhere in sight.
4-44 on D was a f—-king nightmare.
Pick SPG for your chance to win probably nothing.
To think… my g/f at the time wanted a Doig sweater. I bought her Zolzig instead. Then I dumped her.
Pick SPG for your chance to win probably nothing.
Jeff Schultz Sucks on Facebook
Thanks to the great promo, membership has more than quadrupled today alone.
Hilarious….
Oh yeah, I’ll take Milan.
New Poll
What’s lamer: being on Facebook, or spending time on Facebook to rally around Jeff Schultz sucking?
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Penguins fans have their group about how Brashear should change his number because 87 belongs to Crosby, Capitals fans have Jeff Schultz Sucks.
To each their own.
quadrupling from 1 member to 4 doesn’t register in my book…
by Sct112 on Mar 6, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
All defensemen make mistakes at various times in the game, some more frequently than others, and these two probably make the most mistakes on the backline on this team.
The problem is not in making a mistake, but how quick you recover from it. While neither is particularly quick in reaction time or a speed demon, Jurcina has got to be the slowest player on the Caps (and yes, I am including Schultz). As I like to say, “He puts the slow in Slovak”.
He makes some mental errors, and ends up getting passed by opposing forwards. After that, he usually gets called for a restraining penalty, or worse, can’t get a penalty because the other forward is out of reach and way past him (and pulling away!)
Personally, I would think very hard about moving Feds to the back line permanently and pairing him with Green, and have Poti (when he’s back healthy) pair up with Alzner. You can then use Schultz and Morrisonn as the 5th and 6th Dman. I understand wanting to get Feds into the offense, well with him and Green out there, they’ll get their chances.
And then you also don’t have to choose between Jurcina and Erskine…they’re both in the press-box.
Green and Feds scares the hell out of me on the backline. They both have the same offensive instincts, which is to say they don’t have complimentary mindsets, and will no doubt give up far too many odd-man rushes.
These were definitely the good old days
As we have to argue over who is better, Erskine or Jurcina I took a look at an 89-90 Caps media guide. How would you like to have this starting six today:
Langway
Johansson
Stevens
Hatcher
Neil Sheehy
Bob Rouse
Now that was a defensive corps. A perfect blend of youth and age, offense and defense, stay-at-home and attack. There are only two guys on this year’s team that would have a chance of cracking that top six and that’s probably being generous.
by b.orr4 on Mar 6, 2009 4:28 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I’m working from a pretty limited sample size. The only game I made it down from NY for in person this year was the Sabres game over xmas (a good’un!), and watching the few NY or national games on TV (or on low-fi internet feeds) doesn’t always give you a great sense of the progress of a player. But in that one live game, I thought Sean Collins looked outstanding, better even than this blog’s beloved Sarge (or Beaker, if that’s what we’re going with now). So my question for you more knowledgeable types is, if cap and call up spots, etc. weren’t a consideration, would you take a Collins or Sloan or Helmer over Erskine or Jurcina (or Morrison or Schultz for that matter)? Or do you consider the current Caps to be better than anything Hershey has to offer?
I think Collins was the best of the Hershey players called up (other than Alzner) but I also think he isn’t any better defensively than Erskine or Jurcina and doesn’t have the grit of Erskine nor as much offensive talent as Jurcina.
There are plenty of players in Hershey that I would take over Erskine. I’m not going to lie, I’ve never liked this guy…he just seems a few beats behind the tempo of the NHL game. I understand he would fight Mike Tyson for a teammate if he had to, and he does his best to protect the goalie—something this team needs badly. It just seems as if he’s the old NHL, and Shaone Morrison—someone Caps fans talk smack on constantly—does take dumb penalties, but doesn’t Erskine?
It seems like there’s always one Dman that ticks me off consistently. It’s kind of like Sylvan Cote from the late 90’s to early 2000’s: he’s just not with it in my book.
I voted for Jurcina because his potential is there; he just needs to play 110% and have the confidence to shoot more from the point because his shot is potentially leathal.
I’m calling Erskine. Jurcina plays to his partner, while Erskine does the same job, night in, night out. Jurcina has a nice shot, he just never unloads (Why not try the half slapper a la panzer sarge?). Erskine is not the best puck mover, but seriously, is Jurcina? Jurcina has dumped the puck out onto more opposing sticks than anyone I can think of.
They both hit, but I’d argue Erskine’s the better hitter. Also, Erskine fights about as much as Brashear, and fights far better than Bradley. Jurcina has never gone after someone to get even for a team mate. I can think of two occasions that Erskine has.
Finally, Erskine’s name is considered “Correct” by my spell check on my web browser. Jurcina is not.
If we waive Morrisonn and give him a soapbox, a pack of Krispie Kremes, and a microphone, do you think Brian Burke will claim him?
I’ve got to be honest – Juice at 70% is utterly shocking to me. Must be those attack ads he ran against Ersky.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
How many of those would change if he fought someone every game? I bet about half (Bringing totals to 65-35). The fact that he doesn’t, but could, likely brings down his value in a lot of peoples eyes. I think Jurcina though is about 70% of an NHL defenseman.
If we waive Morrisonn and give him a soapbox, a pack of Krispie Kremes, and a microphone, do you think Brian Burke will claim him?
Perhaps the high vote count stems from our recollection of those halcyon first days of Juice as a Cap. Check out your glowing reviews of Jurcina from March/April of 2007, JP (where you say that the duo of Mo and Jurcina should be around for a long time, banging bodies into boards, etc.). I think nostalgia is affecting the poll. (Though I guess it doesn’t explain the souring on Mo.)
the souring on Mo is easily explained by the existence of our eyes. :-)
Russian Machine Never Breaks
That made me laugh.
And yeah, those first couple of months of Juice and Mo were special. We’ll always have the Spring of ’07, fellas.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Is it me, or does part of the problem seem to be the system? In football, you don’t pay a Cover 2 DB $10M a year to play man-to-man (unless you are the Redskins). In baseball, you don’t trade for a pitcher who has great numbers at Petco Park and expect him to pitch the same at Wrigley. Is the problem that the Caps have a scheme that doesn’t fit well with most of the D-men we have?
I’ve been reading this blog for two seasons. I’ve seen love for Schultz, Mo, Juice, Erskine and I see people who want to trade each for a bag of pucks and a Timmy Ho’s gift card. I wonder how much of the inconsistency comes from asking guys to do more than they are able or asking them to play outside of a comfort zone. The offense is suppose to be up-tempo, but what happens when much of your defensive corps doesn’t seem to be up for the challenge?
what happens when much of your defensive corps doesn’t seem to be up for the challenge?
Then you ought to get players who are. This is why so many of us are excited about Alzner and Carlson. They seem a perfect fit to the Caps’ system.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 6, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions
There’s no doubt that systems can kill a guy’s effectiveness (Michael Nylander is probably Exhibits A, B, and C of that) but I don’t think that’s what is happening here. The four guys you named are basically stay-at-home defensive defensemen which means it’s basically their job not to make mistakes. As a result I think it’s easy to think they’re never doing anything of note except when they’re making mistakes which isn’t the case.
But I also think people overrated to slumps and hot steaks. For example, Schulz is getting a lot less love now than he was when he scored four goals in seven games last year while Morrisonn is taking a lot less flak now than he was in November and December.
We’re fans who hang on every game and whatnot, so any given day is just a snapshot, and we try to see the big picture, but it’s inevitably colored by the here and now.
Does Tomas Fleischmann suck? Well, he might. He has lately. But he didn’t in early January. So which is the real Flash? Who the hell knows? All we can do is react to what we’re presented, no?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
All good points. Given that we can’t blow up the D-man portion of the roster this season, should the team use the same kind of defensive scheme as they have been. If the four guys are defensive defensemen, should the defensive scheme help limit mistakes without going back to the Hanlon days?
As for “all we can do is react to what we’re presented, no?”, I have to say it’s presented here better than just about everywhere else. And JP doesn’t have to wear a jacket that looks like it came from his grandma’s sofa fabric …
by I'm not Brian on Mar 6, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
I think the key is managing the ice time and situations of the less skilled players so that they’re not overwhelmed. Poti and Green are good enough to handle just about anything that’s thrown at them, Erskine and Jurcina need their minutes and opponents monitored, and Schultz and Morrisonn are somewhere in between (note: that’s my opinion on where the guys stand, others will disagree I am sure). If you can get each player in a situation where they’re not going to be overwhelmed and emphasize that they don’t have to do too much, they should be fine. My concern is that the Capitals are one top four defenseman away from getting guys in that spot and that guys are playing a slot higher on the depth chart than they should be.
That’s a little too “what is truth?” for my tastes. I honestly don’t mind Flash winding up a little below his full potential (but not too much below!) as long as he’s consistent game in and game out. Sort of like Boyd Gordon – consensus was that he had the ability to contribute a little more offensively, but it never panned out, so we take what we can get. At least we know what we’re going to get from him each game.
Going back to the original topic, that’s why I picked Erskine over Jurcina. Yes, Juice has a better heavier shot and is a little more gifted offensively (though that’s not really the point with these players), Erskine is having the best season of his career. Sure, he’s “just” a #6 D-man, but he plays like a #6 D-man every night. Juice is our #5 defenseman (I guess), but he plays lower than he is on the depth chart to often. Did that make sense?
Oh and insert a “plays like number two” doody joke in here.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
I think that this is an interesting point. As DMG says, these guys are stay at home defensemen.
Here’s a theory. An issue for both the offense and defense is that they get caught watching… their teammates. Ovi is such a force, Semin, Green, Backstrom, even Flash do things that are so amazing, and make it look so easy, that the “other” guys on the ice and on the bench are as awed by their abilities as we are.
When they are skating with “the guys” they watch them rather than the noticing the opponent sneaking behind them. They try and carry the puck across the blueline (offensive and defensive) rather than dumping it.
A lot of that has to be youth and inexperience, some of that will be the system putting them in bad positions. I expect that as these guys become used to being the hunted rather than the hunter, and they become aware that because Backstrom can lift a pass from point to point over a stick doesn’t mean that they can, a lot of the things that we are complaining about an noticing go away.
I’m not how much stake I put in this, it might apply to some and not others, but I’d be interested to hear what you guys think about it.
I think you have a valid point. It seems that when there’s a toe-drag gone bad, the D-men are getting caught flat-footed. The turnover turns into an odd-man rush and probably a penalty.
by I'm not Brian on Mar 6, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions
Let me see if I’ve got this straight:
- Jurcina makes mental mistakes, but Erskine doesn’t make mistakes if managed properly. So, Jurcina’s mistakes are of his own doing, but Erskine’s mistakes are of the coaches’ doing. From now on, I will pay closer attention to the thought bubble (“Empty”?) that can be seen over Jurcina’s head. Is that only available on the HD broadcasts?
- Jurcina makes mental mistakes, but Erskine only makes mistake when overwhelmed. Presumably, when he is physically overwhelmed, not mentally. Is that because he has a superior intellect or no discernible one?
- Jurcina has only looked good because of Alzner. Is it possible that is because Alzner is not Erskine?
- Erskine, when rested, can perform like a beast for nearly two whole consecutive games. Jurcina plays better the more he plays. Good thing the Redskins only play 16 games a year.
- The young defenseman on the roster suck and are not maturing rapidly enough. G_d, I can’t wait to see Alzner, Godfrey, and Carlson on the team next year.
- Erskine shoots more than Jurcina, 8-3 in seven playoff games last year. It sure would be interesting to know what that looks like over a larger—meaningful—sample size, say the last three seasons (Oh, look! Erskine: 90 shots/118 games; Jurcina: 168 shots/170 games)
- We interrupt this program for an important announcement: Schultz sucks, Morrisonn sucks, Schultz sucks.
- Jurcina is the slowest player on the team, including Schultz. Including Erskine, too? Really???
- Erskine is no better than a #6 defenseman, but Jurcina isn’t good enough to be a #5 defenseman. Yes, but what if Jurcina is the #6 defenseman, and Erskine is the #5 defenseman? You do the math.
Erskine has better even-strength goals against per 60mins played than Jurcina, but Jurcina has better net numbers. I haven’t had time to check the rule book yet, but off the top of my head, I think the net number might be more important. Jurcina takes fewer penalties per minutes played, scores more, has a higher Corsi, has played against better competition and with weaker teammates.
I should have voted for Erskine. He hits. I can’t stand defenseman that don’t hit, particularly tall defenseman that, well, that just LOOK like they should be hitting people. Hits are what matter. You can’t stop NHL forwards unless you hit them, particularly as most of them just stand there and let you do it. So, go out there and hit somebody, tall man. Oh, and fight, too. Fighting is good, particularly if you are a defenseman. Don’t worry about sitting out for 5 minutes at a time and the toll that might take on your 5 defensive partners, just go punch somebody’s lights out. Don Cherry may even give you a shout out.
by norrach on Mar 6, 2009 9:00 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
What you’ve done is take selected information and aggregate it, even though it often comes from different people, and tried to present it like someone was making one argument and that’s not the case. For example:
Jurcina makes mental mistakes, but Erskine doesn’t make mistakes if managed properly. So, Jurcina’s mistakes are of his own doing, but Erskine’s mistakes are of the coaches’ doing.
Yes, anecdotally I find this to be the case. Erskine makes mistakes when he is pressured and mishandles the puck or shoots it over the glass whereas Jurcina tries to make passes he’s not capable of making and turns it over.
Jurcina makes mental mistakes, but Erskine only makes mistake when overwhelmed. Presumably, when he is physically overwhelmed, not mentally. Is that because he has a superior intellect or no discernible one?
I believe it’s because Erskine is very, very aware of his limitations and plays within them, while Jurcina is not.
Erskine, when rested, can perform like a beast for nearly two whole consecutive games. Jurcina plays better the more he plays. Good thing the Redskins only play 16 games a year.
Again, that was different people, who have different opinions.
The young defenseman on the roster suck and are not maturing rapidly enough. G_d, I can’t wait to see Alzner, Godfrey, and Carlson on the team next year.
No one mentioned Godfrey until you. The discussion on Carlson was generally about him being up in two or three years, not next year. Alzner has already been up with the team and I’d be shocked if he didn’t play at least 50 games with them next year.
Erskine is no better than a #6 defenseman, but Jurcina isn’t good enough to be a #5 defenseman. Yes, but what if Jurcina is the #6 defenseman, and Erskine is the #5 defenseman? You do the math.
I think the argument there is that Erskine can be solid sixth defenseman and Jurcina can’t. Ergo, if you were to pick one, it’d be Erskine.
We interrupt this program for an important announcement: Schultz sucks, Morrisonn sucks, Schultz sucks.
One person said Schultz sucked and was immediately countered. Some people may have said that about Morrisonn, but it’s not as if the discussion was derailed by it.
Erskine has better even-strength goals against per 60mins played than Jurcina, but Jurcina has better net numbers. I haven’t had time to check the rule book yet, but off the top of my head, I think the net number might be more important.
The net difference is +.25 for Jurcina and +.21 for Erskine. That .04 difference means that the team is better to the tune of .04 goals every sixty minutes, which means the team is one goals better off every twenty-five hours or 1,500 minutes. In short, it’s negligible, especially given that to play 1,500 minutes over an NHL season you have to average ~18:18 a night, which no sixth defenseman does. So, over the course of the whole season, that difference probably doesn’t come into play.
Jurcina takes fewer penalties per minutes played, scores more, has a higher Corsi, has played against better competition and with weaker teammates.
Jurcina takes fewer penalties as a whole but takes 36% more HHT penalties and 27% more restraining fouls. If we’re talking bigger sample sizes, Jurcina has four goals in his last 2,295 minutes (this season and last), or .001743 goals per minute. Erskine has two goals in 1,430 minutes in that stretch, or .001340 goals per minutes. At that rate, assuming 1,500 minutes a year, Jurcina scores one more goal than Erskine every two seasons.
I should have voted for Erskine. He hits. I can’t stand defenseman that don’t hit, particularly tall defenseman that, well, that just LOOK like they should be hitting people. Hits are what matter. You can’t stop NHL forwards unless you hit them, particularly as most of them just stand there and let you do it. So, go out there and hit somebody, tall man.
No one said Jurcina doesn’t hit, in fact it was said more than once that both players hit. If Erskine is the better hitter, that’s a mark in his favor, just like the fact that Ovechkin hits is part of what makes him the best player in the league.
Fighting is good, particularly if you are a defenseman. Don’t worry about sitting out for 5 minutes at a time and the toll that might take on your 5 defensive partners, just go punch somebody’s lights out. Don Cherry may even give you a shout out.
Given that Erskine has one fight this year and it came in the season’s first game, I don’t think that’s a concern.
Wow. I was just going to congratulate the dude on posting a comment with the highest words-to-cogent-thoughts ratio in the history of this site.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
No worries.
By the way, I think that according to the flow chart below, your response is eligible for an “Oh Snap!”

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Goodness, I didn’t realize this was such serious stuff.
Jurcina 225 votes, Erskine 123 votes. Some nefarious sort must have co-opted the Montreal fans’ All-Star Game voting bot to distort the results.
The notion that Erskine’s mistakes are more easily managed by the coaches is interesting. I never really thought to give much preference to one sort of mistake over another, even give the frequent opportunity to do so. I also never thought to assume that good coaches couldn’t help a player overcome mental errors. And I have never won a Jack Adams award, but I would think the task of tightly controlling the match-ups of any one defenseman from game to game would be made somewhat difficult by the fact that half the games are road games (first change) and every game features a second period (long change).
The, apparently, too-subtle point on the numbers is that there is nothing there to really split the two. I will leave the task of arguing on behalf of Erskine’s comparable offensive skills and speed to more astute observers.
(For what it’s worth: no, I did not mention Godfrey first, unless what you mean by “mention” is with tongue-in-cheek. Also, I think you will find above more than one derogatory comment, or Muppet reference, about Schultz, but the point was to make light of the Schultz bashing in more than just this string.)
I could be wrong, but I CTRL-F’d “Godfrey” and didn’t see anything before your post. As for Schultz, I think the Muppet this is really much more teasing than anything relating to his play. It’s like poking fun at Mike Green’s hair or Alexander Semin’s fight with Staal.
You do have a valid point about controlling the quality of Erskine’s opponents, especially during the playoffs when the Capitals play stronger teams, but it has been done so far this season – I don’t think it’s a coincidence that he has the lowest QComp rating of all the team’s defensemen. That said, I still think that the offensive upside Jurcina offers is trumped by the fact that Erskine has been a good penalty killer considering that the team has great offensive depth but is below average in killing penalties and finds themselves shorthanded more than most teams.
BB makes basically no effort to match lines, at least forward lines. He doesn’t try to get AO away from Chara or any other team’s top dman. I assume he tries to match our D a little bit more but I don’t pay close enough attention and I pretty regularly find myself asking why the hell Juice and Erskine are on the ice against Lecavalier (or other top line). If BB isn’t consistently matching our D pairs with other teams’ lines then doesn’t that negate the argument that Erskine’s weaknesses can be mitigated by controlling his match ups?
It would, but the team’s quality of competition for defensemen goes (in descending order):
Poti
Schultz
Alzner
Morrisonn
Green
Collins
Sloan
Jurcina
Erskine
Lepisto
Helmer
which to me suggests BB is cogniscent of who his defensemen are playing against, especially since opposing coaches who do match forward lines would most likely be trying to get their best forwards out against Erskine, Jurcina, Helmer, etc.
Are those numbers 5/5 or do they count special teams. It seems like the guys that get the most special teams play are going to have higher Qcomp numbers because the other team is going to play their better players on the PP/PK. Just a thought but those numbers pretty clearly suggest BB engages in more line matching than he lets on, at least with our D.
Those are only for 5-on-5. 4-on-5 the QComp (high to low) is:
Helmer
Alzner
Sloan
Morrisonn
Erskine
Poti
Jurcina
Green
Schultz
which is kind of all over the place. My guess is that it’s because both the Capitals and their opponents base who’s out on the PP and PK in part on who’s rested and, of course, who’s in the box for the killing team.
It feels like Ovechkin plays 25 minutes a night. It’s hard for BB to avoid the matchups when Ovechkin is out there half the game.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 7, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions
Jurcina has only looked good because of Alzner. Is it possible that is because Alzner is not Erskine?
Erskine has better even-strength goals against per 60mins played than Jurcina, but Jurcina has better net numbers. I haven’t had time to check the rule book yet, but off the top of my head, I think the net number might be more important. Jurcina takes fewer penalties per minutes played, scores more, has a higher Corsi, has played against better competition and with weaker teammates.
This is why I voted for Juice.
How the hell did Erskine v. Jurcina turn into the Hatfields and McCoys?
Russian Machine Never Breaks
There is no level of minutiae to, um, minute for fans to argue over.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Actually, JP, you lost me there. I have no interest in arguing over what kinds of questions would or would not be too small to discuss. I have other things I could be doing…
by Gould Old Days on Mar 7, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions
I think that this needs its own FanShot!
by Sct112 on Mar 7, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
We're bored.
End of line. No games for two days + frustration = fans debating minutiae.
I went out last night and discovered that there is, indeed, life after hockey. Somehow. :)
Speaking of no games … is anyone else planning to listen to the Bears/Marlies broadcast this afternoon?
I am as well.
First period was scoreless, but Bears are up 4-1 at the end of the second. Two for Bouchard, one for GIroux, and one for Aucoin on the PP.
Especially given that just a week earlier, the Bears lit Martin Gerber up for three goals on six shots in just 10:45!
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Seriously.
Bears get out the whooping stick as Walton puts it, and the final is 6-1 Hershey. Giroux got one more, and then Mink added one.

by 


































