For Those Defensemen About To Shoot, We Salute You
photo credit: Graig Abel/NHLI via Getty Images
This one's for all of those fans who, watching defensemen walk the line, looking to dish, yell "Shoot the puck!"
Fans and coaches alike have, since the beginning of the season, encouraged backliners like Milan Jurcina to blast a few more shots on net.
As Juice himself said back in October:
I am supposed to be defensive defenseman, so I don't really think much offense. But if there is decent chance there to shoot the puck, why not?
Aside from Mike Green (and perhaps to a lesser extent, Tom Poti), every other Capitals defenseman thinks defense first. That's accepted, and most often necessary: move the puck quickly around in the D-zone, get it up ice, and let the substantial forward talent on this season's Caps team work their brilliant designs on the other net.
But what I set out to do here was create some measure of how much offensive pressure that defensemen other than Green apply on a game-by-game basis, at even-strength, and see if the results confirm what we would logically predict: when those defensemen are more offensively aggressive, pushing the play, sending more rubber toward the net, the team is more successful.
So I added up the total SOG + total A/B + total MS credited to all of the Caps defensemen not wearing #52 in a single game, to create an aggregate number of attempts on the net in that game ("ATT/G") by the rest of the D corps. Even attempts that miss the net or get blocked can result in strange caroms and might keep the pressure high in the offensive end more often than not.
Why take Green out of it? He's more or less a constant: one of the Big Four upon which this squad can, and must, rely on a nightly basis.
And only eight of his 25 goals on the season have come at ES. I wanted to isolate ES play, especially since the effectiveness of the team's PP, at 24.6% and 2nd in the league, leaves far less room for improvement. Taking the one D who spends the most time patrolling a PP point position, almost to the exclusion of all other Caps defensemen, was the simplest way to do that. (Plus, event summaries do not separate out these ATT/G at ES from those occurring while on the PP.)
Here's a breakdown of average ATT/G by month, along with the team's record:
* For simplicity, I treated all losses of whatever type (regulation, OTL, SOL) as "losses." So making the Caps' record to date (44-28).
What first struck me was that the team's highest ATT/G figure occurred during its most successful month to date (December). You'll recall that, in that month, the torrential injury storm that sidelined blue line stalwarts like Green and Poti and Jeff Schultz necessitated lengthy stints by call-ups Sean Collins, Bryan Helmer, and Tyler Sloan. Guys that, perhaps, were eager to be a little more aggressive and impress the coaching staff with their ability to play in both ends of the ice.
Looking at the season as a whole, the Caps other D average 10.6 ATT/G in wins, and just 9.4 ATT/G in losses. Pretty significant difference.
And when one of those other D-men manage to pot one, the results are extraordinary: an 11-1 record (the lone loss coming in San Jose, that 7-2 beat down). The kind of secondary scoring that seems to automatically guarantee a victory. The average ATT/G in those 12 contests is, well, 12. The average ATT/G in all other 60 games is 10.
So the more ATT/G are generated, the more likely it appears that one of those other D will score, and that the Caps earn another W.
One more final note: Add in Brian Pothier on a consistent basis, and we could really see some offensive pressure from the blue line at ES from a second pairing (i.e., when Green's not on the ice). Potsy finished second in shots per game during his roughly half a 2007-08 campaign, and was first in that department in the 2006-07 season.
45 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Alternate title: Caps Defensemen Shoot to Thrill
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 19, 2009 12:04 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Not to be confused with: Caps Defensemen shoot Heat Seekers full of T.N.T.
"Taking all common sense FAIL nominations here."
Cialis?
"For reason, ruling alone, is a force confining; and passion, unattended, is a flame that burns to its own destruction.
Therefore let your soul exalt your reason to the height of passion; that it may sing; " - The Prophet
I always appreciate me some statistical analysis, but this is not really telling me anything new about our d-corp.
D-men offensive ability is largely about mobility.
Aside from Greenie, our D is rather slow, and therefore not a part of the rush often.
I thik Pothier will make a big difference in those numbers for this very reason!
Well, good news is that he’s playing tonight. Erskine is the scratch. (Per Tarik.
Even if they just play the point and send pucks into the traffic at the net, I’d be happy. Their job in that situation is just to get it into the melee; it’s the forwards’ job to get it past the goalie. If the D puts it past the goalie, so much the better.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
by gotsparkly on Mar 19, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Even if they just play the point and send pucks into the traffic at the net
the key word being traffic.
Even without traffic, it generates a faceoff in the other team’s end and makes the goalie work a little.
Even without traffic, it generates a faceoff in the other team’s end
the key word being faceoff.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 19, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I think the key here is that with a puck going in the direction of the net, you never know what things will happen, and they’re usually good if it’s the other guy’s net.
Ask Semin about the Boston overtime goal sometime.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
Or the late game winner against Boston :)
Your point is spot on, I was just using it as a launching pad for another shot at the team’s lack of traffic.
I always appreciate me some statistical analysis, but this is not really telling me anything new about our d-corp.
D-men offensive ability is largely about mobility.
I don’t think that’s necessarily true. There are, of course, guys like Green or Boyle who rely on speed and jumping into the play, but there are also guys like Souray and Chara, who are threats primarily because of their shooting ability.
Of course, not everyone has the natural talent to do that, but they can be effective just by throwing the puck to the net. If you get it through people, who knows what’s going to happen with a screen, funny bounce, or re-direction. Getting pucks to the net it almost always a good thing, and the Capitals defense ought to do more of it, and I think that’s the point Pepper was getting at.
Exactly, take a look at Alzner’s first NHL point. He didn’t get it on net, nor did he intend to. He bounced it off the end boards just looking to make something happen, and bingo.
Another example of how throwing the puck in the direction of the net is usually a good thing because anything can happen is Semin’s OT winner in Boston. He was tired and headed for a change, and chucked the puck in Thomas’ general direction. He’d already turned away when the team spilled off the bench at him.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
I don’t recall Al MacInnis having a lot of mobility.
by TylerG on Mar 19, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Early in his career, when he was with Calgary he was a bit more mobile, and as he got older and the battles wore on him, his mobility was reduced. What made MacInnis the great player he was was that he changed his game as his abilities changed. Some players don’t change their game as they get older and they’re done by age 32. The great ones do modify their game.
A great example of this is Dale Hunter. In his first years in the league, aside from being a pest, he was a terrific playmaker who played second line center (or first line here in Washington). Geoff Courtnall said Hunter was the second best passer he ever played with (Gretzky was the best, according to Geoff). Remember how John Druce lit up the league in the 1990 playoffs. His center was Dale Hunter.
As the 1990s wore on, Hunter’s ability began to wane with age, and he changed his game and became a checking forward, working on the line to neutralize the opponents’ top line.
by MikeL-Pivonka on Mar 19, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s important for the D to get more shots to the net because the more that threat exists, the more opposing teams have to respect it and play out a little higher, which opens up more down low. This is especially true on the PP, but it holds at ES as well.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’d not only like to see more shots from the point, but I’d like to see those shots taken quicker. Too often guys like Erskine, Jurcina, Schultz, Morrisson hesitate with the puck out there, completely stationary. Shockingly, those shots never get through. Unload that mother!
The keyboard is mightier.
How much of that is coached in do you think?
“You guys get the puck deep, let Ovie/Semin/Laich/Backis work their magic, if you keep it in and play good defense, we’re going to be in great shape.”
Keeping it in by doing something like throwing it off the boards and behind the net is fine and might be preached, but I agreed with breed’s point that those guys tend to hesitate at the point with a puck.
Do you think they hesitate because they know they aren’t that skilled and are terrified to bang a shot off the opposing wing’s shin pads? No shot is better than a breakaway or 2 on 1 the other way.
I think they hesitate because they overthink it. It seems like they’re waiting for juuuuuuust the right moment to get a screen or deflection. That’s probably fine sometimes, but other times they just need to unload the cannon. Quick release shots are more likely to score than heavy ones if the goalie has time to get set.
The keyboard is mightier.
Agreed. The one danger with the slower D-men (Schultz, Juice, Erskine) is that a cleanly blocked shot from the point can create a breakaway/odd-man rush for the team going the other way. So it’s not as cut and dry as just pulling the trigger. I wish more of our guys had Alzner’s instincts to bang it off the boards if the path to the net is blocked.
Ya know… Erskine’s never gonna get that elusive first goal of the year if he doesn’t shoot.
Poti does look for shots on occasion, but he’s been talked to occasionally about pinching in on occasion too… he does have a good hard shot that’s pretty accurate from the point.
Morrisonn needs to shoot more, plain and simple. He seems to score critical goals when he scores… His shot’s not that hard, but it is accurate.
Schultz needs to learn how to leverage his size into getting the stick around to crank the puck. He’s never gonna shoot in the 100+ mile per hour range, but there’s no reason he can’t shoot in the mid 90’s. Big body + long stick = Big shot. Chara learned how to get his body behind shots and now he brings the puck at 103+ Schultz being able to shoot at 95mph would add another weapon to the Caps arsenal.
Erskine hardest slapper is softer than some of Ovie’s wrist shots…
Jurcina (my personal pet peeve) has got a cannon when he chooses to use it. One thing he does, and does well, is shoot the puck. The problem is that he rarely fires it. Early in the game, he should just try to crank a hard one. If it gets blocked or hits the wall and goes flying off, so be it. Let the opponents know you have that sort of shot.
Pothier has a terrific shot in terms of accuracy… it would be nice if it were a bit harder, but better the shot be on goal to get a rebound, then have a harder shot miss the net and go flying out of the zone.
Green has the best shot of any defenseman in the NHL since Paul Coffey. The only players I’ve seen come close since then are Sergei Gonchar, Al MacInnis (harder shot, but not as accurate as Green), Rob Blake and Zdeno Chara.
by MikeL-Pivonka on Mar 19, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree with your assessment for the most part…especially Morrisonn, Schultz and Poti. Jurcina however has a wicked hard shot, but I would not say that he shoots it well. He takes too long to get his shot off, and I would say his is one of the least accurate shots on the team…
And I wouldn’t go so far to say that Green’s shot is the best in the NHL (for dmen)…remember the majority of his goals come on the PP…and a good number of those come when he’s pinching down the wing. I’m too lazy to do the research right now, but I’d be curious to see how many of his goals come from the point, how many from the high slot and how many come pinching down the wing.
But I couldn’t agree more, all of them need to shoot more…
Schultz needs to learn how to leverage his size into getting the stick around to crank the puck. He’s never gonna shoot in the 100+ mile per hour range, but there’s no reason he can’t shoot in the mid 90’s. Big body + long stick = Big shot. Chara learned how to get his body behind shots and now he brings the puck at 103+ Schultz being able to shoot at 95mph would add another weapon to the Caps arsenal.
It’s not that simple. Chara has 40 pounds on Schultz; Ovechkin has 15-20 and “only” hits the mid-90’s.
Taking a slap shot is like pitching a baseball. A lot of it is natural strength and skill, but ultimately it comes down to mechanics. Hence, tiny Pedro Martinez can throw a ball harder than men twice his size. I don’t think size and weight matter on the slap shot if you don’t have the mechanics to use it. There are definitely smaller or average sized players that can shoot bombs.
by Rob Parker on Mar 19, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I also enjoy Alzner’s look of bewilderment.
by Stephen Pepper on Mar 19, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Seriously, what is that Ovie’s mouth? A piece of calimari?
by Moonage Daydream on Mar 19, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions

by 




































