Pick 'Em: Brads or Brash?
There's no question that any discussion of grit, physicality and toughness among Capitals forwards starts with Alex Ovechkin Donald Brashear and Matt Bradley. The two are second and third in hits among the team's forwards, have accounted for 20 of the team's 26 fighting majors, and can generally be counted on to forecheck hard and use the body when necessary.
However, neither Brashear and Bradley is exactly an offensive dynamo - the two have five goals and thirteen points between them on the season - and if another forward were available, they'd probably be the two Bruce Boudreau would look at as potential scratches. With that in mind, the question we have for you today is: If you were Bruce Boudreau and you have only one sweater to give to either Brashear or Bradley come playoff time, who would it go to? Some season stats to help your decision-making:
| Bradley | Brashear | |
| Games | 68 | 63 |
| Goals | 4 | 1 |
| Assists | 5 | 3 |
| Points | 8 | 4 |
| Plus-Minus | -1 | -6 |
| PIMs | 55 | 121 |
| Fights | 9 | 11 |
| Fight Record | 0-5-4 | 6-3-2 |
| Hits | 104 | 119 |
| Blocked Shots | 16 | 8 |
| Takeaways | 17 | 20 |
| Giveaways | 18 | 26 |
| Corsi | 1.0 | -0.8 |
| ES GF/60 | 1.74 | 0.95 |
| ES GA/60 | 1.83 | 1.66 |
| Qual. Comp. | -0.03 | -0.09 |
| Qual. Team. | -0.48 | -0.55 |
| ATOI | 10:41 | 8:14 |
94 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bradley, I think.
Brads drops the gloves when he needs to, and is has a lot of hustle and energy. Most importantly though, he takes one for the team. As Sct112 says, there isn’t much fighting in the playoffs, and we’ve got other guys who can level their opponents when they want to (AO, ShaMo, Juice, Erskine, and even Green can lay people out from time to time). Brads brings guts and character to the team in a way that nobody else does.
"It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." - Delores Ibarruri
I think it’s Bradley here, and by a lot, but wonder if the poll results would’ve been different if the question was asked before the Caps went into Philly sans Brash and had no problems with the level of physicality in the game. I know my vote wouldn’t have been any different, but I suspect others’ might.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Whether its fair or not, I perceive Brash being very one dimensional. I think that he gets credited with hits, because Nasty Left = Physical = Hitter. I just don’t buy it. I don’t remember the last time he laid someone out, ala ShaMo in Nashville. That line does a good job of cycling the puck, but I don’t think that its worth a spot in the lineup.
Brash’s toughness only equates to big hits in video games.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Brads
Brash beating up the other team’s goon isn’t bringing much. I told friends after the Nashville game that they should scratch Brash in the playoffs unless they’re playing someone like the Flyers who really likes to goon it up. I think the “he keeps you from going after Ovi” argument is stupid, because think about Briere spearing Ovechkin in the pills two years ago… Did Briere get pummeled by Brashear? No. Brashear fought Andrew Peters instead. That’ll show ’em!
Game Over T-shirts: http://www.cafepress.com/beltwaysports
Exactly. Couldn’t be dumber. It happened most recently in the Atlanta game – Thrasher clips Ovi, Brash fights Boulton. What does that accomplish?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
The argument for Brash here is that his presence intimidates people and prevents runs through the team’s goalies and star players. I don’t buy it (and if ever there was a night to test the theory, it was last night), but you can’t even make that argument with regards to Brads.
To me, though, what prevents runs through the team’s goalies and star players is capitalizing on power play chances, which the Caps have done an excellent job of all season. Want to run our guys and take dumb penalties? We’ll make you pay for it.
The problem here is that come playoff time, the refs tend to let a little more go, but the bottom line is the same – make ‘em pay for their thugliness (huh?) and it’ll stop. Certainly more than Donald Brashear fighting the opposition’s goon will.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 13, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Absolutely. But if Briere runs Theo, he isn’t going to fight Briere so he doesn’t need to worry about getting his a** kicked. Maybe he worries about Cote getting thumped, but I don’t see that being the case.
Btw, this poll is going to be the first mano-a-mano “win” for Brads on the year. Nice.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
One thing, among many, that I love about Brads — while he doesn’t much come out on top in bouts, he fights his opponents as if that other guy just punched his wife. I mean, the raw emotion on his face captured in some of his bout photos — priceless.
Of the stats, the key there is his GA/60 — on par with Steckel and Gordon. Respectable.
Plus, the guy’s got wheels — he’s a buzzsaw.
This post needs this pic:

Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 13, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Love that Pic
Loved the post it accompanied even more. “Ass-kicking chain of command”? Inspired stuff.
Is someone going to vote for Brash and then make a comment? Its only a forum, if there are two sides to the conversation.
This vote is even more one-sided than Belak vs. Brash.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I guess I’m just a contrarian SOB today : )
I voted for Brash, despite the statistical evidence. His hands are better than Brads’, with knuckles and with touch, and he remains, notwithstanding the Belak beatdown the other night and the mysterious lack of balls shown by the Flyers last night, the only bona fide counter balance we have to the other goons in the league.
Can we get by without him? Yes. Last night is evidence you can take to the bank. But if I had to pick one over the other, give me the Donald. I love Brads for what he does, but a heavyweight he ain’t and there are 100 guys who could fill his particular shoes. Not the case with Brash. I remain steadfast in my assertion that this is Brash’s best season since joining the Caps.
Thanks :)
What are you basing your season analysis on? Toughness? Beatdowns? Lockerroom?
That might be the strongest argument for Brash, it seems that he gets along really well with Greener and Ovie. I’m not sure what sort of leadership role he has but teaching the young guys a bit about toughness can’t hurt.
I couldn’t comment on the lockerroom presence, but reports are he (and Brads, too) are gems. I think Brash has performed well in a system that might, at first glance, not be best suited for him—certainly his numbers are “down” since BB arrived, but I think his role is well defined and he is plugging away in it. Until the last month, he’s been responsible defensively (he’s a -4 since Feb 15) and he’s not cost us with dumb penalties (as others more skilled than him have). And he has shown he does get the odd big goal (a shocking 13 career GWG).
He Likes It When I Call Him Big Papa
Yeah, so I voted for Big Papa Brash. I know it sounds silly, but I just think he has a great presence. I like the way he interacts with the rest of the team and the way he carries himself. His attitude makes me smile. He had a fight a couple of weeks ago (Sorry, I can’t remember with whom) in which his opponent kept skating around and avoiding him instead of fighting. He had his fists up to fight, and then he got irritated and put his hands down and gave the guy a look like, “Are you kidding me?” I loved it.
I love both of the Bra Boys (as JP has called them in other posts). I love Brads for his spirit, energy, and better stats, but I’ll always vote for Big Papa. It’s just a loyalty thing… nothing rational.
"For reason, ruling alone, is a force confining; and passion, unattended, is a flame that burns to its own destruction.
Therefore let your soul exalt your reason to the height of passion; that it may sing; " - The Prophet
In what matchup would you take Brash? If the Caps draw the 1972-73 Flyers in the second round?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 13, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Brads is six years younger, and Brashear is rendered moot by Erskine as far as needing a “tough” guy (and Erskine is more valuable than both of them)
Ron and Fez Noon to Three
by YvonLabresMoustache on Mar 13, 2009 2:19 PM EDT reply actions
I think I might like to see a platoon if we played the Bruins, Flyers or Pens. I question if Bradley is big enough to handle a very physical seven game series in that role.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Know how many fighting majors there were in last year’s playoffs? Seven
Year before that? 13
Year before that? 14
Given that there are 15 series in a playoff year, that’s less than one fight per series in each of the past three years. I think Brads is big enough to handle one fight per series, don’t you?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I just assumed there would be no fighting. I’m talking more about the physical pounding of a seven game series. But I don’t want to argue about it, because I don’t really care.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
Thats an interesting question. Does Brads (or Brash) have the durability to play in a very physical run through the playoffs? Will one or the other be more likely to breakdown and lose their effectiveness? Age would be on Brad’s side, but size on Brash’s right?
They’ve each played 60+ games so far this season – what’s another 20?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’m shocked by the results. I think it’s Brash by a long shot. They roughly equivalent in their uselessness offensively. Defensively, Brads might be a little better, but only a little.
But Brash brings a lot more to the table in terms of the primary reason for either of them to be there — toughness. Even when he doesn’t fight, he’s a physical force with his crushing checks. Brads throws some checks too, but they don’t hurt or intimidate the way Brash’s do. Also, Brash’s presence helps keeps the other side from taking liberties. Yeah, I’d like him to assert himself more in that regard, but is there any doubt at all he’s still more of an initimdiation factor than Brads?
All that said, I like both in the lineup. But if I had to choose one, it’d be Brash and it wouldn’t be close.
I don’t think they’re equivalent offensively. Over the last two seasons Brashear has six goals and six assists in 143 games and Bradley has eleven goals and sixteen assists in 145 games.
But the big concern for me is skating ability. Brashear struggles to keep up most of the time, and Bradley doesn’t, which makes me feel like Bradley is much less of a defensive liability.
When Bradley and Ovechkin share the ice, I always feel like something good could happen. I’m not saying it should happen any more than it does, but I am saying I think Bradley has some balance to his game.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 13, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Honestly, Brash. It very rarely happens b/c they are both LW. But Brash looks lost to me when AO is on the ice. And Bradley and AO at least try to get something going with one another.
by Gould Old Days on Mar 13, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, you can look at those numbers and say that Brads is more than twice as good offensively. Or you can look at them and say neither one contributes much offensively, but over the course of a 20-25 game postseason (that’d be neat), we’d expect Brads to chip in 1-2 goals and Brash 0-1. Not a difference that matters, imo.
Defensively, you may be right about the speed. Fortunately he plays wing, which requires less up and down skating. And does the punishment he inflicts on opposing D with his checks make up for it? Maybe.
One factor that could make a big difference is stamina. I get the impression Brads is in better condition, although I don’t know if that’s based on anything other than Brash being a mountain. In a marathon playoff game, that might tilt the scales toward Brads.
Anyhow, I view them as bringing different things to the table. Brads is more of a “heart” and energy guy. He’s like Cooke, only likeable and respected by his teammates. Like I said, I’d prefer to have both of them in the lineup.
I voted for Brash too, because I thought he was a force in the playoffs last year. Neither guy can finish, but a highly motivated Brashear can really cycle the puck in a way that Bradley just can’t. He also brings more of a veteran element, though perhaps his value as a leader can be questioned.
I think the fighting is pretty much irrelevant, given that it’s the playoffs. None will happen, and either guy can be a fighter if the team needs it (as can Erskine). The bigger question is who can grind it better and who is less likely to take bad penalties. I’m going to pull a Don Cherry here and ignore those stats and go with my gut that Brash is the better play.
Then Clark and Brads. If we really, really need a fight, then let Clark step up and take it. But as JP points out, fighting is a regular season occurrence.
That said, Brashear gets a sweater for game 1 against Philly. So he can set the tone. By scoring the first goal…
by Gould Old Days on Mar 13, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Biggie – you said “rec’d” but did you actually rec the comment?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
That said, Brashear gets a sweater for game 1 against Philly. So he can set the tone. By scoring the first goal…
That sounds about as likely as the ever-elusive Jeff Schultz hat trick.
This is the most memorable post season fight for me.
What is it about the name Samuelson? Those guys were the biggest POSs ever to play in the league.
by Moonage Daydream on Mar 14, 2009 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I love seeing this post – when we were dealing with lineup issues earlier in the year before Clark went down, I was a big fan of sitting Brash. He is such a liability in every aspects except for the fighting and he does not seem to be doing a lot of protecting this year.
I love Bradley’s intensity, even though I understand how replaceable his skill is.
Brads
For all of the other reasons, too, but mostly for the blocked shots. He always takes one for the team.
In a quick defense of them both, I’ll say that 2/3 of the teams in the league wish they had to make this choice. Neither of these guys will ever be an all-star, but they’re not bad for eating up 8-10 minutes of ice time per game.
I took Brash. Yes, Brads has slightly better stats, but they’re not enough to make up for having a guy on the bench who can win fights when necessary. I’d also bet that Brash is a better player than most enforcers in the league, but I don’t have the stats at my fingertips to back me up on that.
Brash
I think Brashear would wip Bradleys ass, and I’d rather have him on the ice at any given moment, especially with the game on the line.
OneSeasonNHL
Truth about fighting...
Winning a fight isn’t that important. A guy fighting and sacrificing his body is enough to motivate a team. When another team fights Brashear and the guy doesn’t royally get his ass kicked it’s considered a win for them. Big Georges even wrote an article about that.
The only important part about having Brashear out there is he’s a fan favorite and we all like seeing him pound people. As far as his effect on the game over Bradley or Erskine though? Negligible.
And on the other hand, Brashear has more playoff goals than Viktor Kozlov.
by zephyr on Mar 13, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Question: what is the Caps record when each of them has a fight, regardless of fight outcome?
The Cap with the better team winning percentage deserves the red jersey
"Every person is a damn fool for at least five minutes every day. Wisdom consists in not exceeding the limit." Elbert Hubbard.
I did this quickly, so im not 100% sure it’s right… and I only used this season.
According to hockeyfights.com Bradley has had 9 fights and Brashear has had 11 (2 came in the same game against Riley Cote and the Flyers)
Cap’s record this year when Bradley fights: 3-5-1
Cap’s record this year when Brashear fights: 5-3-2
However, in 4 of those games both guys fought that night. So removing those games gives us:
Bradley: 2-3-0
Brashear: 4-1-1
I would still give the sweater to Bradley though, because as you can see the Caps have had fights in just 16 of their 69 games (23%), in the playoffs it’ll probably be even less. Additionally I get the feeling Brashear ends up fighting when the Caps are beating a team and the opponent is looking for someone to fight with. Bradley seems to fight more often in the close games that have a better chance of going either way.
Discipline
To a large extent a guy playing on the fourth line’s job is to go out and play hard without hurting his team. Brashear has a tendency to take bad penalties – his extra roughing call on Sunday or his triple minor against Boston last year, as examples – and whether it’s from his nature or his reputation, it’s still bad for the team. This season, Bradley has five minors and had drawn nine while Brashear has taken nineteen and draw eleven.
by David Getz on Mar 13, 2009 6:22 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
That’s fantastic – penalty +/-. Should’ve been in the chart, dog! :)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
It’s blogging – change it on the fly and no one will know the difference. :)
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Mar 13, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Brashear has a tendency to take bad penalties … Bradley has five minors and had drawn nine while Brashear has taken nineteen and draw eleven.
+1.
Also, despite the small difference in fights (11 vs. 9) their difference in PIM is definitely substantial.
Fights are pointless. I’d rather have an able body ready that can push people around and stay out of the box than someone who’s only skill is being able to fight. I think if you’re going to punish someone you should do it during the game, not as a side show.
by snowburnt on Mar 13, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
The most telling stat up there: Bradley has 55 PIM, of which 45 are for fighting, meaning has only 5 minor penalties while he’s skating his usual shift. Brash has 121 minutes with 11 fights, that’s 66 additional minutes. I think there may be a misconduct or two in there, but even then, he takes way more minor penalties that put the Caps shorthanded.
In a pinch, Bradley can also kill penalties… the last person not name Jurcina that I want to see out there killing penalites is Brashear…

by 







































