"GM George McPhee just said that captain Chris Clark could miss the remainder of the regular season with the wrist injury that has been dogging him since training camp. Clark is at the doctor's office right now. I should know more later, but McPhee said it's looking like Clark will, in fact, need surgery on the wrist."
about 1 year ago
J.P.
103 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
This is an unfortunate way to receive great news.
Get better, Cap’n. Get here, King.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Feb 2, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not yet so sure.
As I said in a previous thread:
Don’t get me wrong, I like Alzner a LOT. I like what he brings to the table, but if Clark does go on LTIR, there are a couple of options for what to do with the cap space, and the trade deadline is less than a month away. Also, we have to factor in the possibility of Pothier coming back, since he appears to be getting close to being cleared for contact. That might not be till next season, and that seems to be the most likely scenario, but it’s still out there.
I’m okay with bringing Alzner up IF he sees as much ice time here as he will in Hershey. Right now, we need to get the lines and pairings to gel for a playoff run, and if we’re rotating D in and out because we have 7 D up, that’s a problem too.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Judging by what we’ve seen so far, I don’t see why he wouldn’t/couldn’t have similar ice time. Or at least top 4 minutes, which I’m OK with.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s possible. I still think trading for a veteran D at the deadline isn’t out of the question.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Right now, we need to get the lines and pairings to gel for a playoff run, and if we’re rotating D in and out because we have 7 D up, that’s a problem too.
I disagree. We’re talking the remainder of the season and (hopefully) a deep playoff run. There’s simply no way whatever top 6 the team wants are all gong to stay healthy through that stretch. There’s a reason NHL teams generally carry seven defensemen, and it’s the way to go for the Capitals right now too.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don Fishman, MD
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Feb 2, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
so who sits?
do you call up another winger (Bourque) or a d-man (Alzner)? both? who would sit?
i’m not sure they will bother to call anyone up.
by ns on Feb 2, 2009 12:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Alzner. Juice watches.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Feb 2, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And Ersky/Poti/Mo get some maintenance days, as needed.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Feb 2, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you do if Pothier comes back? :x
I know he can get 6 days in Hershey, but after that…
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Pothier isn’t coming back. He’s a nice story, and good on him for getting to where he is, but I’d be fall-off-my-chair surprised if he was cleared for full contact AND able to get into game shape this season.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
by J.P. on Feb 2, 2009 12:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he’ll get cleared. I don’t know if he’ll be able to get into game shape. It’s why I say if, not when.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If he’s cleared for contact, doesn’t that mean he must come off LTIR? How much discretion do the Caps have to override a doctor’s decision, especially given the nature of the injury?
If it ain't broke, don't break it.
by ChrisAm on Feb 2, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m leaning more and more towards moving Mo at the trade deadline, honestly. It’s pretty obvious to me he won’t be resigned next year. (I could be wrong BUT.) That clears the issue of both cap and # of D.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I tend to think moved. He wants $3M a year and will NOT get it from the Caps, not when they need to sign Backstrom and Semin. His play doesn’t justify it.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Better to move him for something than let him sit around and do nothing. Not that he’s Alfonso Soriano or anything.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Then we lose him to free agency too, and get nothing for him.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Nationals did get two first round draft picks for Soriano, which is more than the Capitals would get for Mo under any circumstances.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was only because of stupid baseball rules about losing free agents, though. They could have gotten more.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I mis-remember, it was actually a first round pick and a second round pick, but I still think find it hard to believe the team would have gotten more for a rental player who wasn’t going to re-sign with any team he was traded to.
In any event, the first and second round picks are a lot more than ‘nothing’.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Zimmermann
Soriano turned into Jordan Zimmermann, who is currently ranked as the #1 prospect in the Nats’ system by Baseball America, and who will be battling for a spot in the rotation this year. They also got a kid named Josh Smoker, another left-handed pitching prospect (although with less of a chance at making an impact).
by Scott in Shaw on Feb 2, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes. It has to be Alzner up and Juice sitting. Anything else would be curious to say the least. We already have our healthy compliment of forwards and the general consensus is that our defense needs improving.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we have to take the trade deadline into account too. What are GMGM’s plans come March 4th? Agreed that the D needs shoring up, definitely, but bringing up Alzner isnt the only option, and I would think that moving at the deadline for a veteran D man sure isn’t out of the question, which leaves Alzner out.
(Still, I’d keep a bag packed and by the door were I Mr. Alzner.)
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t mind when players play hurt. It bugs the Hell out of me, though, when players are hurt, and play and it hurts their team. I feel Clark may have been doing it, trying to uphold the integrity of his “C”, or whatever reason he was doing it. It’s a god damn shame the guy has injury problems, but if surgery was needed, he needs to get it done. There’s no sense in blubbering around with it and hurting your team.
Here I was, thinking it was a slump. =(
Are we looking at one call-up(Alzner) or multiple(Alzner/Bourque?)
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:20 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
“…when players are hurt, and play and hurts their team.”
Could not have been said better. He was just being stubborn, and should have just sat out.
You play when you’re hurt, not when you’re injured.
by Simply Sensational on Feb 2, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, I think we’ve seen the last of Pothier. As Clark demonstrated, it takes a while to get back up to speed playing in the NHL after you’ve missed a significant amount of time. Even if #2 was able to return this season, I highly doubt he’d be as effective as we (and he) would want him to be.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think his “potential ceiling” is the AHL now. I’d love for the guy to surprise me, though.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And I think he’d only be eligible to play in the AHL for a short while – like a reconditioning stint or something like that. Besides, he is an NHL caliber D-man when healthy. But concussions are so unpredictable when it comes to recovery time.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t feel qualified to make that call, honestly. Remember that he’s said that he’s going to get completely healthy and cleared to play and then decide whether to retire or not.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a lot of that has to do with if he feels he can play NHL quality hockey. Good for him.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There’s also the question of what does he do if it happens again. He’s got a family to think about.
We’ll see. I’d like to see him come back for his sake, but whether it happens this season is a big question mark. I think offseason is more likely.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And I concur with your above comment about hoping Pothier can surprise us. I’m not anti-#2, not at all. I’d love to see him back. I just have a feeling he might not be able to. :/
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s in the back of my mind, too. He’s a hell of a competitor for trying to get into NHL game shape, regardless of how it finishes up.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t they like to replace guys who get hurt with similar players? In this case, I see them bringing Bourque back up, and not Alzner
Ron and Fez Noon to Three
by YvonLabresMoustache on Feb 2, 2009 12:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but with the Cap room you can get both. And why wouldn’t you?
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think so. Clark out, and we were at 22. Two guys in, 23.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we’re already scratching forwards from the lineup each game right now, so a forward position can be filled without even calling anyone up. Moving Clark to LTIR gives us extra cap space, and cap space was the only reason Alzner wasn’t playing for the big club right now.
I totally follow your logic, but I think the Caps will bring Alzner back up.
I have as many wins in a Capitals uniform as Michael Belhumeur does.
by marky narc on Feb 2, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, but I think more options = better. With 23 players, you can have two spare forwards and a spare d-man. Trade the parts around when you need to. It’s a good situation.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If it plays merry hell with the chemistry.
I still think Mo moves at the trade deadline – when he was Green’s partner, he was part of the plan. That didn’t work out, so now he’s kind of on his own. Schultz is young and cheap and still improving, so I can’t see trading him.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t mean a trade to another team. I meant, if a guy needs a night off, he trades his ice-time for a press-box seat for a night.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know :)
I’m just thinking that that much trading around might making geling lines difficult, and think that if Alzner is up for good, Mo, just became a large cap-chewing rock and will probably move at the trade deadline.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t cry if we traded Mo.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1) Another option is to make no roster moves unless/until an injury ocurrs or the team slumps?
2) Agree that bringing up a forward wouldn’t make sense as they have an overabundance there right now.
by Fauxrumors on Feb 2, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
If it was up to me, that’s exactly what we would do. Ride the current roster until a move NEEDS to be made.
by Sombrero Guy on Feb 2, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I could go with that, although I could also see us making a move at the deadline for that veteran S@H D everyone’s been screaming for.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that’s what I was thinking as well. No need to call up Alzner or Bourque or another Bear until we need them. Hopefully we can get some extra Cap space along the way allowing us to make some deadline moves.
The only thing is that with players on LTIR you don’t earn cap space, you’re just given the chance to replace the salary if needed. I think.
by Sombrero Guy on Feb 2, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Correct on the way the cap works with LTIR. At least that’s my understanding.
I just don’t think it’s to Alzner’s benefit to call him up as a 7th Dman.
Now, one possibility that continues to appeal to me is moving Mo and bringing up either Sloan or Alzner – either works. Sloan is a much larger cap hit differential from Mo than Alzner is and lets us rack up more wiggle room, and is still a reasonably capable NHL Dman.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 1:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Captain
If Clark is out for the season, I hope Fedorov is given the “C” for the stretch run. I love his experience and trust him to take on that responsibility very seriously.
Looking ahead, I can’t see anyone other than OV wearing the “C” after this year…Clark included.
by ninefttall on Feb 2, 2009 12:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why would they assign captaincy to someone if Clark is out for the rest of the season? He was out all year last year and I think they just tossed an extra A on someone.
The only way I see them moving the C off Clark is if they are done with him.
I’d like Ovechkin or Laich to get it in that case.
by zephyr on Feb 2, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Laichhhhh
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
BB just confirmed it:
Coach Bruce Boudreau, meantime, said he has no plans to make a switch at captain.
“Clark is our captain,” he said. “There’s no controversy there. When he gets healthy, he’ll come back and be our captain.”
by zephyr on Feb 2, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Peerless makes a really good point – that if Clark is indeed done for the season, suddenly we have enough cap room to wiggle with to make something happen at the trade deadline, where we didn’t before. That’s like a gift, and not one GMGM is fool enough to throw away.
I think Alzner comes up next year or next injury, not before. Certainly not before the trade deadline.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 12:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Alzner is up minimally as soon a defensive injury ocurrs or the playoffs start. We have NOT seen the last of him this season!
by Fauxrumors on Feb 2, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe, maybe not. Depends on what happens at the trade deadline.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Alzner coming up is about as likely as my passing my upcoming Acoustics quiz that I’ve kind of studied for but not really.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
So you’re telling me there’s a good chance you’re going to pass your test?
by zephyr on Feb 2, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Irony, was postponed.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 11:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“We’ve talked about some options in there,” McPhee said. “It may be Karl, it may be some other defenseman we bring up. [Sean] Collins has been good [in Hershey], [Tyler] Sloan has been good.”
Someone’s coming, it seems.
Football's boring. Get over it.
by Whiter Mage on Feb 2, 2009 1:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Poor Karl, he can’t get groceries now. :)
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
IMO GMGM will hold off on bringing up Alzner
For no other reason but to gain more cap space. We’ll see Alzner up here full time by the trade deadline, but for the next month, he’ll be in Hershey getting as much PT as possible.
The longer we go without calling up Alzner the bigger the splash GMGM will make at the trade deadline IMO.
We can go out and get a more expensive rental by saving cap space for a month.
GMGM will bring someone up from Hershey for an audition so that he can trade that person by the deadline .
by vt caps fan on Feb 2, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Capitals won’t add any cap space by keeping Alzner in Hershey.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true, but they do keep the amount of money being paid out by Ted down quite a bit by running a roster 1 or 2 players short of being full
by Sombrero Guy on Feb 2, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True, but Alzner’s actually salary this year is about $875,000 which means he probably making about $175,000 in Hershey. With less than half the season to go, the difference paid out by Leonsis would be ~$300,000 and I get the feeling Leonsis would rather have the team have a player like Alzner on the roster than save the money.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t his Cap hit higher then $875k because of all the added bonuses he ‘could’ hit?
If not then MY B – I need to reread Sombrero’s Salary cap guide from the summer time.
by vt caps fan on Feb 2, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, the high cap hit is higher. I’m not sure what the performance bonuses are in his contract, though.
Regardless, at this point the Capitals are spending about 58M in salaries and are on pace for 109 points, which is about $532,000 per point. Bringing up Alzner would cost Leonsis 1.1-1.4 million more in salary, even if he hits all his bonuses. I’d think Alzner in the lineup would result in more than a two/three points increase over the course of the rest of the season so I don’t think Leonsis is going to start penny-pinching now.
There’s also the issue of playoff revenue: it’s a huge boon for NHL teams. If Alzner can get the team in a higher spot for the playoffs and/or his added experience nets the Capitals an extra few playoff games at home, he more than pays for himself.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t get me wrong, I see your point and I want Alzner back just long we all do, but I was thinking along the lines that if we save $1 in February, we can spend $2 in March.
by vt caps fan on Feb 2, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leonsis can, but the team can’t because they’re up against the cap already with players on LTIR.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Word. I think I got it. I knew I should have taken Salary Cap Management in college.
by vt caps fan on Feb 2, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, it’s confusing as hell. I’ve read the LTIR section of the CBA five or six times and I’m still not sure I understand it all.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Alzner’s overall cap hit is $1.67 million. But there’s other factors involved, I believe, and I’m not even going to pretend to understand them all.
My guess is that Alzner will be called up after the March trade deadline, after McPhee gets who he wants to get and sees what cap space is remaining. I don’t think Mo will be moved (he’s an RFA, so his rights still can be traded in the off-season) unless a great deal drops in McPhee’s lap, but Nylander probably will be heavily shopped.
I also believe that the salary cap doesn’t apply in the post-season.
by Forsch31 on Feb 2, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you are correct, the salary cap does not apply for the post season. Technically speaking, the players don’t even get paid for the playoffs. Their contracts are for regular season only.
by Sombrero Guy on Feb 2, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In that scenario I don’t see the value of not playing Alzner in Washington right now. Why not just use the 2.67M in cap space to keep Alzner on the team now and send him down if the team trades for someone who puts them over that threshold?
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
He can be sent back to Hershey if someone falls into the Cap’s lap. The only reason I can see to keep him in Hershey is if he won’t be getting playing time up with the big boys.
by Sct112 on Feb 2, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is a real concern, to my mind. Who do you sit? If you won’t have him for the playoffs, then you’re hurting the team’s chemistry by sitting someone for Alzner if you’re not sure he’s going to be in the playoffs and the final rush, and right now, we’re not there yet.
I’m not in a huge hurry to bring Alzner up. I like the kid a lot, but I don’t want to rush along to get aomsthing now when it could bite us in the butt in May.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or be able to move at the trade deadline. I don’t see how we get more benefit from having 7 D right now (and just because every other team doesn’t mean we have to). I’m looking for a healthy captain next year and room to play at the trade deadline for that veteran Dman everyone’s been calling for. Alzner closer to playoff time.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the benefit to seven defensemen is that it lets Alzner get more NHL playing time, which should help him in the playoffs. Plus Alzner is better than at least a couple of the guys who are on the team now, so it makes the team better, which is always good.
My understanding of the cap situation is this: the team is allowed to exceed the cap by the amount of Clark’s salary on a day-to-day basis in order to replace him. Clark’s at 2.67M and Alzner’s at 1.675M, with Alzner on the roster the team has about 1M to play with; without him they have 2.67M. That’s true whether Alzner’s in Washington today, tomorrow, Valentine’s Day, or St. Patrick’s Day. Keeping him in the minors now is not going to add any more financial flexibility come trade deadline time.
I personally don’t see the value in trading for another defenseman if the team already has seven and seven’s too many anyway though.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nylander and Mo for Pronger?
(e3)
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
eklund…which was to underscore how absurd the suggested trade was. i can’t always bat 1.000 with the jokes, people….
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was all over that
But how’d you miss this gem
Semin and Mo for Kovalchuk (e4)
by wittcap79 on Feb 2, 2009 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i think the problem is when you’re goofing on eklund you can’t tell what is mockery and what he may have actually said. lol.
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it might have been that, given the ‘suggested’ trade. Well played, sir.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You either use the free cap space or you lose it. There is no magical cap bank from my understanding.
by zephyr on Feb 2, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s true when the team is over the cap due to a LTIR exemption. In that case the team is considered at the cap so they don’t bank anything. If there’s not LTIR a team does bank cap room.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Merry Christmas, everybody!
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting stuff, guys.
So, assuming the Caps leave Alzner down, which doesn’t make a ton of sense to me, what is the next move? A deadline trade I presume, but whom? The salary cap would still be a pretty major constraint for anyone they’d bring in, and I’m not sure this team really needs any cheap veteran wingers. A stay at home D would be nice, but I’m having a hard time picturing anyone better than Jurcina/Mo (our 7th guy if Alzner is up) that would fit under the cap and would be an on-ice upgrade.
I wonder if McPhee is going to try to pull off something like trading for and stashing Gaborik on LTIR until the playoffs, not that I think it would be a great idea. A move like that is the only way I see to give the team a big on-ice boost and still fit under the cap.
Of course, all of this presumes Nylander can’t be moved. If he can be dispensed with, then things could get interesting.
by grapejoos on Feb 2, 2009 3:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t think it’s in the Capitals best interest to do anything. The one scenario I could see playing out is this:
(1) The team trades Shaone Morrisonn for a draft pick, freeing up 1.975M in cap space. Of that, 1.675 is taken up by Alzner. That leaves ~300k in cap room.
(2) The Caps use picks and/or prospects to pick up another defenseman, replacing Morrisonn and retaining team depth at the position. With ~3M in space (assuming Clark on LTIR) the team should have a decent number of options.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 3:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks DMG, I guess ~3M is more than I thought they’d come up with. Still, who will be on the block that could fit in that amount of space and who would be an upgrade? Tricky stuff.
by grapejoos on Feb 2, 2009 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i can actually see this. I can also see moving for a veteran D at the trade deadline. Guess it all depends.
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see a move for D as more likely than landing our future #2 center at the deadline this year. Two teams to watch, who could be major sellers at the deadline: Anaheim and Ottawa.
by bigonetimer on Feb 2, 2009 6:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Possible D targets on those teams (note that this is not an endorsement – I don’t know how good a lot of these guys are). Also, Luke Richardson is still on the books for Ottawa!
Ottawa:
Chris Phillips, 30, $3.5m/year, signed through 2011
Filip Kuba, 31, $3.0m/year, pending UFA
Anton Volchenkov, 26, $2.1-3.2m/year, signed through 2010
Anaheim:
Surprisingly few options here. Niedermayer and Pronger both make over $6m/year and it’s hard to imagine a trade. Hedican and Montador are relatively cheap (~800k) pending UFAs. Pretty much everyone else is young and making peanuts. Looks a lot like the roster of a team in/recovering from cap hell.
by grapejoos on Feb 2, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Philips and Kuba are both out of the Caps price range.
by David M. Getz on Feb 2, 2009 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it would definitely require moving somebody (or two) else. Bret Hedican could work, though. GMGM has squat for leverage
speaking of Anaheim, that Bobby Ryan kid is unfucking believeable
by bigonetimer on Feb 2, 2009 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Volchenkov is a shot blocking machine. Also faces the toughest qual comp on Ottawa as well as having the worst Qual Team, not a good combo for his stats.
by wittcap79 on Feb 2, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s kind of a tacky comment. You’re glad the man’s hurt?
by gotsparkly on Feb 2, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
as one who is glad, let me clarify – i’m glad he is acknowledging that he is hurt. i think it’s a different ball of wax if he was perfectly fine, played horrible and then got hurt. then you could be glad, just not as openly. :-)
Russian Machine Never Breaks
by macvechkin on Feb 2, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leadership
Assuming Clark’s done, I agree Feds gets the C (even if they don’t stitch one onto his sweater, he’s the leader.) With or without Clark, I am worried we just don’t have the type of leadership on the ice, in the pipes or in the room to win a Cup just yet.
I know its a different NHL now. But this club reminds me of the Red Wings in the early 90’s. They actually lost a bit of overall talent level and added experience and grit before it clicked. The Sharks clubs of the last five years are another example – young talent and size, but something has always been missing.
A healthy Clark would do wonders i the playoffs, but we don’t have that. I think we need a Scott Walker/Aaron Ward type of guy.
by Cap74 on Feb 2, 2009 6:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on Japers' Rink
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recent FanShots
Southeast Standings
| GP | W | L | OTL | PT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Washington
|
72 | 48 | 14 | 10 | 106 |
|
Atlanta
|
72 | 32 | 29 | 11 | 75 |
|
Florida
|
71 | 29 | 31 | 11 | 69 |
|
Carolina
|
72 | 30 | 34 | 8 | 68 |
|
Tampa Bay
|
72 | 28 | 32 | 12 | 68 |
(updated 3.21.2010 at 10:53 PM EDT)
The Vault
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
