Recap: Caps 4, Canadiens 3 (SO)
[AP Recap - GameCenter - Game Summary - Event Summary]
As the final seconds of Saturday night's game between the Caps and Canadiens were winding down, the visitors from D.C. seemed to be headed for a third consecutive road loss and a fifth straight game without scoring a power play goal. Then Paul Mara took a high-sticking penalty with 15.5 seconds left, Nicklas Backstrom won a draw, Eric Fehr won a battle in front of the Montreal net, and the game was headed to overtime.
The ensuing five minutes didn't solve anything, and when Backstrom beat Carey Price in the bottom of the third frame of the shootout, the comeback was complete. Victory snatched from the trap, err, jaws of defeat.
Ten more notes on the game:
- In 65 minutes of actual hockey, the Caps only got 23 shots on Price (more than half of which came off of the sticks of Alex Ovechkin or Fehr) and had another 23 shots blocked by Habs skaters (with Jaroslav Spacek and Roman Hamrlik leading the way with six and five, respectively). Those numbers underscore the trouble the Caps continue to have generating offense against trapping teams (they're now 1-3-1 against Montreal and Jersey with 11 goals scored in those five games), and the need for further adjustments when facing them.
- Somewhat further to that point, the Caps didn't get a single shot on goal from a defenseman tonight. Not one.
- AO came into the game having played an average of two seconds per game shorthanded so far this season. Tonight he got six seconds... and was at least partially responsible for the Canadiens' first power play goal in four games when he got caught chasing the puck and leaving the left point wide open.
- With 15.5 seconds left in the game and an offensive zone draw coming, Bruce Boudreau put his 45% faceoff guy out there instead of his 62% successful pivot. It worked, so it was the right move, right?
- Let's talk Alexandre Giroux. With a chance to play on the top line with two of the game's best players, he ends the night with two offensive zone penalties, a shot on goal and a helper. His decision-making and execution are just too slow for the speed of the game at the NHL level, and the sooner he's back in Hershey, the better.
- Speaking of Hershey, Karl Alzner had one heck of an eventful shift midway through the second period, making a fantastic play to stick with Tomas Plekanec in a one-on-one situation, having a shot blocked at the other end, and losing Plekanec (thanks to a Plekanec cross-check to open up some space) back in front of his own net, allowing the Czech to score. All in 56 seconds. And cross-check or not, he can't lose a forward in front like that.
- Sticking with Plekanec, he's turning into quite the Caps killer, with 17 points in 18 career games now against Washington. The Caps' Czech number 14, on the other hand, has four points in ten games against the Habs.
- Semyon Varlamov had a better night than the numbers would indicate, but it might be time to get him a rest soon. Like Monday. Then again, can you really sit a guy who has one regulation loss in twenty career regular season appearances?
- AO is back on top of the League in shots on goal now, which brings a sense of calm and order to the hockey world.
- It should be pretty clear to Fehr what he needs to do to be successful, no? His two goals may have traveled a combined twenty feet from his stick to the goal line.
And so it's off to Raleigh to play - gasp! - a Southeast Division opponent and one that's very much reeling at that. It's always great to get an exciting win on the road with an entire nation watching... but the Caps have plenty of work to do after this one.
Game highlights:
283 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
After losing alot of games we should have won, it’s OK to accept winning one we should have lost. Again (and again, and again, and again . . . ) if only we could play a full 60 minutes . . .
In fairness, they do play a full 60 minutes… every two weeks or so. There was Boston on opening night, then San Jose, then Philly, then Minnesota, and then Wednesday’s Buffalo game. So they’re due for another in a week and change.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
This argument kills me. I agree with you, 100%, becuase yeah, it won’t. But it’s NOVEMBER. The playoffs happen in April. There’s always something to tinker, to fix, and I’d rather have this issue now than, say, March.
Added to this is the fact there is going to be an Olympic break, and I’m pretty sure every team will have to fix their kinks as that ends. Right now, get points. Get yourself into playoff position. And then worry about how you’re going to win there, because doing it the other way around can miss the playoffs.
Familiar Rapports: Bald Pollack, F&B, Gould Old Days.
Lobbies: Osala, Perreault, Erskine, Pothier, Neuvirth, Flash.
Fan of: Mean Lars Backstrom, Line Mashing, Cake.
by Whiter Mage on Nov 29, 2009 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
I have to disagree, for two reasons. One is that I don’t think we’re talking about tweaking X’s and O’s or even team philosophy, we’re generally talking effort and being there mentally, and that should always be there. The other is that Caps aren’t in any danger of missing the playoffs because of their style of play, so they really ought to be focusing on refining elements of their game so they come out better for it in the end, even if it means sacrificing points in the short term.
It’s your reasons I’m comfortable with though. It’s not X’s and O’s that we’re having trouble with (though, PP outright stinks now…)… It IS mental, and I would disagree that it should always be there. It’s early in the season. They’re among the top in the east right now, and have barely played their own division.
I think they learned last year going tape to tape doesn’t really matter. What does is conserving energy and effort for when it really matters, which, as WM said, is after the olympic break. We have Feds to thank for this mentality, but we have seen time and time again, the hot teams from Feb – April are the ones that make it far in the playoffs. Not the ones that go wire to wire beating everyone in the reg. season (See San Jose, Boston…).
What I see about this team is when they are up against a worthy opponent, they bring it. Buffalo is one of the best teams in the east right now, and they got dominated by the caps and Varly. We show up to play the statement games, and act like a cat toying with a mouse against the rest of the league.
This is how it is. We have quite a few guys who will be in Vancouver for 2 weeks in February. Part of me believes that much of their focus is squarely on that goal at the moment. When that’s over, this team should look a lot better.
we’re generally talking effort and being there mentally, and that should always be there
That’s exactly my point. All those games the Caps led in the third period; they didn’t lose those games because they were tinkering or fixing. They lost those games mostly because they didn’t want them enough. A game is there in front of them to win – and they let up because they’re saving themselves for the playoffs?? I don’t think so. It’s somewhat related to the lack of toughness issue that others have raised. Winners want to win – every game, every time, against every team. Believe me, I hope they can turn it on later, but I’d feel better if they showed me now that they’ve got it in them . . .
I thought they played pretty well to start against BUF. They missed the net on several quality chances so the shots didn’t reflect it, and the Sabers didn’t exactly have threatening chances. Most of their shots were perimeter shots. I’d call that a 60 minute effort.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I wish to make a motion. Let’s move the Olympic Hockey games to the late June-earlyJuly time frame. Yes, I realized it’s the “Winter Olympics” but it would just work out better frmo a scheduling point of view. Olympic camp could start in May or June and as teams are eliminated from Stanley Cup competition, the stragglers could then join their teams.
Voila! Christmas in July.
Rocking the Red since 1975
I support this — or barring professionals from the Olympics again. Neither will happen.
"Camaraderie, that's what the Washington Capitals are all about."
by CapitalCentre on Nov 29, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
Do you really think the Caps have lost many games they should have won? I’m thinking there’s a karmic debt to be paid, not a credit coming the Caps’ way…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:09 AM EST up reply actions
The Caps have led in EVERY loss they had this year. In the vast majority of those game, they held the lead in the third period.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Without, of course, looking at any actual numbers, I would speculate that if the Caps just won the average number of games that teams win when leading in the second (or third) periods, we be leading the league in points by a wide margin.
Yeah, considering IIRC they’re perfect when trailing first and/or after 1.
by red army line on Nov 29, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions
Here’s the actual “tale of the tape” on Caps losses:
Loss 1 — Philthy
Were leading 5-4 in 3rd period when Hartnall scored a PP goal to tie.
BG in box
Loss 2 — Rangers
Were leading 3-2 in third when Rangers scored 2 goals.
BG in box for Ranger’s final goal
Loss 3 — Detroit
They initially had the lead in 1st period
Were tied 2-2 in 3rd period when Detroit scored 3rd goal
Green in box for Detroit’s final goal.
(Green and Semin each took 3 penalties)
Loss 4 — Devils
Caps initially had 2-0 lead after 1. Still were leading 2-1 in third when Devils tied it. Then lost in a shootout.
Devils scored short handed goal.
Loss 5 — Islanders
Caps were leading 3-2 in second when Islanders scored to tie up game. Lost in overtime
Isles scored short handed goal
Loss 6 — Columbus
Caps were leading 4-3 in third when Blue Jackets scored to tie up game. Goal came right after Knuble came out of the penalty box. Blue Jackets’ winning OT goal came when Pothier was int he Box.
Loss 7 — Devils
Caps led 1-0 after 1st period. Devils tied it in 2nd. Devils scored 2 consecutive goals in 3rd. Caps scored 1 more.
Semin in box for Devil’s 2nd goal. B. Morrison in box for Devil’s 3rd goal which proved to be the winner
Semin in box 3 times total.
Loss 8 — Devils
Caps led 2-0 during 1st period. Then the wheels fell off and the Devils scored 5 unanswered goals.
Devils tied up game on power play goal when Green was in box
Loss 9 — Montreal
Caps led 1-0 after 1st period. Montreal scored 2 in 2nd period and 1 in 3rd period. Caps scored 1 more.
Laich in box for Hab’s 3rd goal which proved to be the winner
Loss 10 — Toronto
Caps led 1-0 after 1st period. Toronto tied it up in 2nd period. Caps lost in shootout.
Loss 11 — Ottawa
Caps led 3-1 after 2nd period. Senators tie game in 3rd and win in overtime
Ovi was in box when Senators tied game on power play.
Rocking the Red since 1975
by CapsFan75 on Nov 29, 2009 10:14 AM EST up reply actions 9 recs
I meant to say for the Detroit game, that Green and Semin each took two penalties. I shouldn’t make those two guys any worse than they already are. And they do both have a large upside.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Awesome stuff! Totally worth a separate fanpost. You post it, I’ll rec it.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
No doubt that in general the Caps have a team that against most in the NHL has to make mistakes that the other team capitlize on before they loose, even with a few or more than a few guys out. I think the opposite can easily be true as well as was exemplified in the 2-0 shutout of Buffalo where the Caps played a very well executed game. Also the first period against Montreal, then for some reason in the sencond and third period they seemed to decide they’d rather play pond hockey…
The good news is that in general they usually decide to play like what they are – that’s why they are on track to 105 – 112 points this season. The bigger issue is they need to start tightening things up so they are in the right frame of mind when the compressed post-Olympic race to the playoffs starts.
by markbona-capsfan99 on Nov 29, 2009 4:27 PM EST up reply actions
So we had the lead in every game and 6 out of 11 games we had the lead after the second period. If this team played with a more consistent (not perfect – nobody’s perfect) level of intensity . . . .
and/or stayed out of the box!
"No Brooks Laich, no win. Know Brooks Laich, know win."
by kellobellow on Nov 29, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
If I never see Giroux in DC again, it will probably be too soon. Sloan could have done a better job on the top line. (Okay, probably not, but you get my point.)
The Caps fan doesn't say, 'is the glass half full' or 'is the glass half empty'. He wonders when the glass is going to spill.
Will they put Fehr on the top line? Or will they leave EF with Laich and Morrison?
Rocking the Red since 1975
I think Fehr’s developing some chemistry with Brooks and BMo, so I suspect he’ll be left there for now. Things change when Semin/Knuble return.
"Let the rest be scared of us." - Emo Bunny Sasha Semin
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 29, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
Well done.
"Let the rest be scared of us." - Emo Bunny Sasha Semin
by Scott in Shaw on Nov 30, 2009 5:44 PM EST up reply actions
Perhaps I should have a word on scheduling family movie nights on nights other than Caps games…
Ya freaking grasshopper!
by Steck It Out on Nov 28, 2009 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
Good idea. Magnet it on my fridge.
Ya freaking grasshopper!
by Steck It Out on Nov 28, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
Make sure to focus on the Saturdays when TOR doesn’t play but WAS does (preferably against a Canadian team). Probably not too many of them left this year.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
They will be the late game on HNIC against Edmonton in a few weeks
I lived with a blind guy for a while, then he figured it out and demanded back rent.
by Rather Bengt on Nov 29, 2009 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
Nice. We may get another PPP invasion then.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
GDT with the PPP crew makes me feel like I just did very vast quantities of very high quality drugs. I know I shouldn’t feel so damn good about it, but I do.
They definitely are a fun crew. Possibly the second best SBN blog (IMO their rival for that would be FTF).
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Huh? We are number one. I’m saying PPP and FTF can fight for 2 and 3.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
PPP totally wins that fight, though the members of FTF are good people.
"And next year it will be ours."
PPP probably wins on volume but the guys that run FTF and a sizable handful of regulars are amazing. I think it also helps that TOR usually plays when the Caps play so I’m not watching that game. I’ll go catch a late game at FTF. You won’t catch me saying anything bad about either of them, though.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
But they’ve had their own head cases they could have used it with.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Right.
“Trending Michalek.”
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I think I’m part of the “cast Erskine loose” lobby too. Two or three cases of him looking like a pylon trying to keep the puck in, and another where he did a Jeff Schult impression. Wonder if the latter will lead to YouTube videos or Facebook hate groups…
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 10:58 PM EST via mobile reply actions
It’s amazing just how awful. Think he’s reeling from the pressure beneath, or is he honestly just this bad?
He obviously wasn’t this bad last April.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 28, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t remember NYR and PIT attacking Erakine’s lack of speed so directly as Montreal seemed to do to tonight. Remember, the lumberjack’s what, 29, and on his third team? Someone gives me a draft pick for him in March, I think about taking it.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 11:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Well I’d take it, but I guess that also depends if Mo’ Juice is gone yet.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
True dat.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 11:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
So true. And Green was “good” for only one major giveaway this game. I worry Alzner will pick up bad habits from our D if he stays up too long.
They’re two different styles of players, and Karl’s had more international experience (I believe) than Green, if we’re factoring in WJC time. I wouldn’t make that osmosis argument quite yet.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 11:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I’m pretty sure you’re right about international experience, but what’s your angle with it? How’s it relevant?
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I’d say his poise being in the WJC combined with the way he plays isn’t going to make him force passes as often as Green might. Maybe I’m a little about tossing that int’l experience in there.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 11:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I’m not saying it’s wrong. Was just wondering where it came from. I definitely think Alzner is more poised and wise defensively than Green, but that’s what everyone expects from him. Hard to tell if it’s just his game or if being in all those big spots has really helped him like that. Probably some of both.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
They’re two different styles of players, and Karl’s had more international experience (I believe) than Green, if we’re factoring in WJC time. I wouldn’t make that osmosis argument quite yet.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 28, 2009 11:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Spot on J.P.
Victory snatched from the trap, err, jaws of defeat.
Glad you said it, I was starting to feel like Crazy Trap Conspiracy Guy.
AO is back on top of the League in shots on goal now, which brings a sense of calm and order to the hockey world.
Now for goals.
You completely echo my sentiments re: Alzner and Fehr on their bullet points. If this game doesn’t convince BB that Fehr needs to be on a line with other players that can carry the puck and get it on net, then I don’t know what will. I say Fehr should live on that top line until Knuble comes back. Alzner needs to stay on the Caps permanently. Even with losing Plekanec (a mistake that I’m sure he, unlike other D, will learn from and be better for) Alzner still is a massive upgrade on our D and needs to stay.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
by Rob Parker on Nov 28, 2009 11:05 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Oh and ...
Somewhat further to that point, the Caps didn’t get a single shot on goal from a defenseman tonight. Not one.
But Green did drill a puck into the opposing forward on the PP when it was clear that the shot was not going to get through. Then he speared him while he was on the ice. So we got that going for us.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Gangsta hasn’t busted the requisite number of opposing players balls this season. He’s just trying to do what’s expect of him.
Males not laughing.
Okay a little…
DC, where Hockey is a baffling ordeal.
by Chris meet Alex on Nov 28, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
green’s drive and lay off pass to fleischmann in OT was a thing of beauty, though. i thought that was going to be the game right there.
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 28, 2009 11:37 PM EST up reply actions
So you forgot that Fehr and Flash switched numbers? Poor form for an archivist.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
are they the sedin twins all of a sudden?
fyi, my sean avery pursuit was ended by hooks:
Cooke would drop the gloves with Ryan Callahan to atone for his hit, both earning a 10 minute misconduct to ensure their nights would be over. Then Aaron Voros tried to pick a fight with Jordan Staal and Sean Avery, being Sean Avery, basically jumped Ruslan Fedotenko from behind when the play went the other way for whatever reason. Avery got an instigator and a misconduct for his troubles, and Fedotenko wasn’t penalized at all.
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
Hooks is good like that. I went over there after the Isles game to see how he felt about J. Staal instigating Thompson after a questionable hit on a Pen. (He was pro-fight, even though it definitely hurt the Pens in that game. Sound familiar?)
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I think so long as BB is coach, that won’t be a problem.
by RedBirdie on Nov 29, 2009 12:39 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Alzner looked great despite the mistake, he reminds me so much of the way Nick Lidstrom plays, if he can have a fraction of the career he’s had we in Caps nation will be in good shape.
His assist would have been a shot on goal for a D man if Fehr hadn’t so rudely deflected it (yes I know, picking nits).
Not only the slow thought process but also the slow feet (so much for the much publicized off season skating work), and sin of all sin for a desperate tweener he was seen to my eyes doing a lot of not skating. To me, that above all else, shows how uncomfortable and lost he feels in the show. Having not seen a single Bears game I KNOW he didn’t score 75 by not moving his feet, he just is completely intimidated in the NHL. Enjoy your career in the A Crash Giroux… I feel really bad for you, but you don’t belong here.
DC, where Hockey is a baffling ordeal.
by Chris meet Alex on Nov 28, 2009 11:10 PM EST via mobile reply actions
after the Plekanec goal it looked like Karl was beating himself up on the bench, he looked sick and he knew he missed his assignment. Its that drive that makes them great, they hate to make the mistakes and I think the difference with Alzner as to other young defensemen in the league is I dont think he lets those mistakes affect his psyche and the way he plays out there.
I think another big difference is that Alzner has the mind and skill to learn from and not repeat his mistakes. Juice and Mo are never going to be quick or good with the puck. They’ll never stop being who they are.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I’d say, Fehr has found himself a home — at least on the second line. He and Ovi have been our entire offense as of late. (In my humble opinion, Fehr should have gotten the 1st star instead of Ovi. I would have given Ovi one of the other stars.)
Even if Alzner made a mistake, I’d say he belongs in the NHL.
Rocking the Red since 1975
It’s not for skill that he hasn’t been in the NHL until now…
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 28, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think that’s the incumbent he’d replace, personally.
4, 23, 89, 2, then 26.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 29, 2009 12:12 AM EST up reply actions
I dunno pothier has been playing very well as of late IMO, but I agree with the others. I rank our D as follows.
Green
Poti
Pothier
Alzner
MOrrison
Schultz
Juice
Erskine
by Garyland1177 on Nov 29, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
That’s fair; I’d rank Pothier over ShaMo, too, but just barely: they’re about as good as each other in their respective roles.
But I really just meant that I see Erskine, Juice, and Sloan (who will not be waived) being replaced by Alzner before any of the others.
And Schultz is definitely top 4.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 29, 2009 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
bad 'points', all
Erskine and ShaMo, for their big raises and little talent, are the ones I’d most like to buy a bus ticket. If 09 playoff Jurcina shows as needed, he stays in my “whatever” file with Pothier. Sloan I assume knows he’s a temp.
by redlineblue on Nov 29, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
Morrisonn, Schultz, and Erskine?
One of these things is not like the others.
by redlineblue on Nov 29, 2009 12:30 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Is it even worth pointing out that Schultz was not on the ice for any goals against tonight?
Nah, if you’re ranking either Juice or Morrisonn above Schultz these days, you probably don’t care about actual gameday performance. Your mind was made up long ago.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:23 AM EST up reply actions
on second thought my rankings don’t matter that much. On any given night we see a different D man step up and the next night looking lost. What our blue line lacks is consistency. While I think Schultz has been playing well as of yet I can remember several games where he was our worst skater on the ice.
by Garyland1177 on Nov 29, 2009 1:32 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, but you’re putting a 23 year old with barely two full seasons in the league against a couple of guys 5 years older than him. One of those guys still has potential (and plays a better game than given credit for), the other guys, not so much.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 29, 2009 1:54 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
So who should be the first line right winger now?
Would putting Fehr there mean we’re putting all our offensive eggs in one basket? And then who takes EF’s place on the second line? Does Laich move to RW and Flash moves up a line? So now MP has no real scorers on his line? MP had plenty of energy today but his line hasn’t scored as of late.
Rocking the Red since 1975
I think Fehr/Clark/Laich are the placeholders for Semin, and then maybe possibly replacing Semin with Knubs when he comes back. They are ridiculously short on RW, aren’t they?
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 28, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions
We know that Clark is/was a placeholder. Fehr will remain as a Top 6 forward until Knubs is back. This is assuming that Semin is back before Knubs.
Current plan — Semin comes back Thursday and steps into the empty spot. Second line remains as it is (Laich/Morrison/Fehr), especially when it seems to be working.
When everyone’s back, MP will have a might good line with especially sick talent, especially for a third line.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Card-carrying member of the MP lobby or not, I don’t see him here beyond his 10 games, or whatever it is to make one of his contract years expire.
Unless that doesn’t apply to him.
Next year, though, i think he’s got a decent chance at 2C out of camp.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 28, 2009 11:54 PM EST up reply actions
I think 10 games burns a year. That’s why all the CHL guys get sent back after 9.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
What is the 30 mark then? That was something important for Alzner last year? RFA status?
"I think the relentless negative coverage in The Washington Post is a real difference from previous years," Redskins general counsel David Donovan said. "But in terms of the way our actual fans are behaving, we don't see any difference."
I think 30 might be for RFA status, but I’m not positive. I just know that when I brought up the 30 game limit regarding Alzner last year I was wrong.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
He’s already been here for 10 games. I think 30 might be the next important date but I’m not positive. I think he’ll decide whether he’s up or not. If he keeps playing like this how do you send him down.
Next year I can’t wait to see him and Mackan at camp.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I think it’s 10 and you can’t go back to Juniors; 30 and you are counted as having played a year for RFA status purposes.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:24 AM EST up reply actions
I think the 30 is for RFA and the 10 is for the first year of ELC. I’m positive you can go back to Juniors after 10 because that’s what PHI did with Sbisa last year. They sent him back mid-year so they burned an ELC year and maybe an RFA year then sent him back to the OHL (then traded him and his burned years).
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Current plan — Semin comes back Thursday and steps into the empty spot. Second line remains as it is (Laich/Morrison/Fehr), especially when it seems to be working.
Interesting. Personally I’d rather have Fehr on line one and Semin on line two given that:
- I don’t like Semin/Ovechkin/Backstrom
- Fehr’s good when he goes to the net, Ovechkin’s good when someone his line goes to the net
- Having Semin on line two gives that line an elite talent
by David Getz on Nov 29, 2009 9:37 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I think we all know it’s a given that we’ll see a little of both those scenarios. Because SOB is a terrific line. For about two periods at a time, at best.
The Caps fan doesn't say, 'is the glass half full' or 'is the glass half empty'. He wonders when the glass is going to spill.
Motion seconded. The rotation will get even more interesting when Knuble returns.
by mechanicsville on Nov 29, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
MP had tons of energy tonight. I was pissed he didn’t get a shift in OT.
Semin will be back soon so the depth of scoring (and getting a scorer onto MP’s line) won’t be as much of an issue. Right now I don’t see how you take Fehr off the top line. He’s obviously working better when he has a) a guy to carry the puck and b) a guy to shoot the puck on his line, so he’s not doing either. When it was MP, Clark and Fehr you would see MP carry the puck, Fehr go to the net, and Clark get the puck to the net. Now Baxter can carry it, AO can shoot it, and Fehr can clean up. I said something at the start of the year about how every time the Caps pick up a FA to do a job they just see one of their own prospects step up and do that job better (Nyls was signed but Baxter emerged; Poti was signed to run the PP but Green emerged; Theo was signed, Varlamov emerged, etc.). Looks like Fehr is the emergence from the Knuble signing (and MP from the BMo?).
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
by Rob Parker on Nov 28, 2009 11:59 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Fehr has certainly stepped it up lately. I’ve been part of the Fehr lobby from way back. If we move Fehr to the front line, who takes his place on the 2nd line? (Once the injuries are healed, then we have plenty of candidates to consider.)
Do we decide that Laich/Morrision/Fehr is our best line for secondary scoring and leave them intact or do we put all our offensive eggs in one basket and move Fehr with Ovi?
While Knuble was a great FA pickup and I like him very much, I figure that, in the long run, either Fehr or Semin has to be the right wing on Ovi’s line.
Rocking the Red since 1975
AO/Baxter/Fehr
AS/BMo/Knuckles
Flash/MP/Laich
Clark/Steckel/Bradley
Dream come true.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
by Rob Parker on Nov 29, 2009 12:10 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Not a bad choice of lines. (I nearly missed AS when reading it the first time since I’ve got accustomed to seeing him as RW.) I know that LW is his natural position but he’s moved to the right when Ovi takes extra long shifts and BB wants to give him more ice time.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Yeah, I’m not a stickler for R/L. I think NHL players should be capable of doing either. Especially when you are the guy responsible for mucking in the corners and crashing the net.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Except some guys don’t do well switching wings. Like Flash seems to so much better as a Left wing than a right wing. Or he’d be on the top line.
Fortunately for the Caps, Laich and Semin have been adaptable between left and right wings.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Have we tried Laich on 1st line?
It seems that Knubs and Bmo play well together and Semin can play his original LW.
I feel like I am missing something. Why doesn’t Laich play with OV and Backs?
by Garyland1177 on Nov 29, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions
You’ve been improperly Rec’d for your very well balanced lines.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 29, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions
Shit, I totally could’ve used Fehrly Balanced lines. Oh well.
JP I NEED EDITING!
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 29, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, sorry that wasn’t a little more clear.
by DrinkingPartner on Nov 29, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
capsfan75, the “up” button on a comment’s byline will send you to the previous comment he/she was replying to, just fyi.
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 12:25 AM EST up reply actions
I didn’t make the name. Someone else came up with it early on.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Pssst
You were supposed to let Natty dig up the original coronation.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
You still would get the credit. Just sayin’… Natty’s on fire tonight.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
on fire like scott skiles in NBA jam.
i was busy trying to find hooks’ first ever comment at the Rink. i think it’s this one, although his formal introduction came later. i’m a loser. goodnight.
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
That’s some deep research. We’ve all got our roles on the Rink and you do yours well. Doesn’t make you a loser. (Ok, maybe some of that is a defense mechanism given my ridiculous comment total.)
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
the first baxter in SBN content is actually F&B. either way, it was definitely perpetuated by F&B, who owns the next 20 or so references. BP objects a full 7 months later, and F&B officially claims baxter as his own. no one bothers to object, either because F&B is right, or because the nickname is so totally lame..
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 12:42 AM EST up reply actions
Or because nobody wants to pick that pointless battle to get into with F&B. But I think DP was talking about Knuckles, not Baxter.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
wait, why was i looking up baxter? “knuckles” was all drinkingpartner, and there went up a muffled roar of approval.
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 12:49 AM EST up reply actions
And my pet greyhound is still named Baxter – a name we gave him in 2007. So there.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:27 AM EST up reply actions
My Aunt is huge into greyhound rescue. Huge.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I like her already. Seriously, if you get two greyhound owners in a room, they will talk for hours about their dogs and about greyhound rescue. It’s a funny little world. I had no idea what I was getting into when I got the dog.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions
She’s a vet so she’s huge into helping animals. She has a whole bunch of rescue pets. My parents don’t have a greyhound but they do have 3 rescue dogs of their own.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
That’s a bitchin’ third line – pretty serious depth on the wings, there.
by Knee high to a duck on Nov 29, 2009 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
I hope you’re right. BB loves him some Flash. It’d be some bitchy irony if Fehr ends up on the 3rd line b/c he’s more versatile than Flash.
by mechanicsville on Nov 29, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah I could definitely see that. The good news is that even if Fehr gets bumped to the 3rd line he still has a dangerous C to play with so he should still produce.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Rec'd for analysis
re: 92/19; 3/52 etc. I’ll be acting like I thought of it by the end of next week. You forgot “Feds was signed to add flights of fancy and o-zone PIM but Sasha stepped up…”
by redlineblue on Nov 29, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
re-watching the habs PPG, the AO overpursuit becomes impossible not to notice. great pick-up, JP. have to hope he plays it more conservative there, especially with seconds left on the man advantage.
He’d just come out on the ice, presumably to kickstart the post-PP offense – a mistake Bruce likely won’t make again any time soon.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
And what were you trying to say with that last comment? Or was “station identification” for Japers’ Rink.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Now you’ve answered. Now how do you edit comments on this blog? I haven’t figured out how yet.
Rocking the Red since 1975
You can’t edit, which may sound like a bad thing, but in reality it’s for the best.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
Just popped over to check things out after posting my blog (http://wnst.net/wordpress/edfrankovic/2009/11/28/caps-knock-off-habs-in-shootout-4-3/) and it appears JP and I have alot of the same observations (great minds think alike?? LOL!!), especially when it comes to Giroux. I agree Karl made a mistake on the Plekenac goal but Steckel once again made a d-zone turnover that led to the goal. I like Steckel but he is having a rough 2009-10 campaign despite his great face-offs stats.
Hi Ed
Look forward to reading it. Steckel is definitely off to a tough start. If he wasn’t gripping the stick so tight I’d wonder if he had feet for hands.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I was on my way home from CP after watching the Terps lose a record 10 games when the Plekenac goal was scored, so I only heard the play-by-play, but from what I heard (sorry haven’t seen it yet) I was totally blaming Stecks. Something is definitely up with him. Aside from face-offs, his game has been rough.
Here’s another great mind:
“We got two points on the road and you can’t be disappointed in that but at the same time we’ve got to be a little bit better and we’ve got to play a full 60 minutes, which we haven’t done in a while,” Fehr said.
fwiw, Clark said the same thing on HNIC second intermission. Elliot basically asked if the Caps’ propensity to blow leads was their biggest issue, to which Clark said something along the lines of “there are some games where we’ve blown the lead, and somehow eked out a win [where they shouldn’t have gotten it].”
Sigh. Now if only they could do something about it.
With 15.5 seconds left in the game and an offensive zone draw coming, Bruce Boudreau put his 45% faceoff guy out there instead of his 62% successful pivot. It worked, so it was the right move, right?
Either way, that faceoff was just a thing of beauty. Backstrom out-musciling the Hab, kiciking it back to Flash who makes a beautiful pass to AO. Fehr drives the net, scores the game-tier. Absolutely amazing
Fehr is fair, but I like Laich
What had the faceoff numbers looked like before that? Had Nick been having a good day on the dot to make BB think he was going to win that? A loss there ends the game.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
faceoff report. doesn’t tell you exactly what you’re looking for, but if Plekanac was the guy out there for the Habs, that might explain why BB was willing to chance Nicky out there.
But the road team makes the first line change, so Bruce wouldn’t have known which Habs C was going to be out there (though it would’ve been a good guess, given Plekanec’s SH TOI and the ice time he’d already had in the game).
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
One of reasons Nik was out there was the guy he was up against. Up to that point he had won 6 out of 9 against Plekanec. The win on the final faceoff pushed it to 7-10 for the night. By comparison, the 62% faceoff guy was only 50% against Plekanec for the night.
Good eye folks. True team effort on the Rink.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
every night is a team effort here at the Rink (hey, Caps, pay attention!)
by RedBirdie on Nov 29, 2009 12:31 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Except that it was an away change. It was PK, so not an icing, which means that Bruce led the way with Nicky right?
"I think the relentless negative coverage in The Washington Post is a real difference from previous years," Redskins general counsel David Donovan said. "But in terms of the way our actual fans are behaving, we don't see any difference."
Even better eye
It was after the PIM not an icing. So MON definitely got the last change. Maybe BB knew Plekanec was on PK1.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Likely – dude’s their #1 PK F.
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
If so that’s an absolutely great job of in game managing by BB. That’s the kind of number crunching you see a baseball manager do.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
all I know is that was a clutch win.
Can you give three assists on Fehr’s goal?
by Garyland1177 on Nov 29, 2009 1:40 AM EST up reply actions
without looking at the stats, it seemed like Backstrom had a strong night at the dot, and maybe Bruce was playing the hot hand. Either that or he thought Backstrom had the upperhand on whoever took that draw, im sure there was just more than percentages over the year that played into the decision.
I tend to agree with this. Like Frost never said “hmm, this seems like a good place for a metaphor,” BB probably doesn’t think that much about whom to send out in such a situation. Probably just 19 vs 39, and he went with 19.
by red army line on Nov 29, 2009 3:47 AM EST up reply actions
Someone linked to the JP-Leach (Evason?) interview about Backstrom. The coach said that 19 wins the key draws.
by red army line on Nov 29, 2009 3:45 AM EST up reply actions
everyone together now: awwwwwwwwwww
Mathieu Perreault spent $800 on 10 tickets for family members, then he went to center ice for the opening faceoff and won it. Just guessing here, but that might have been the highlight of his life. “That was a lot of excitement for sure,” he said. “You want to win that first faceoff for the team. I think I won it, too. So I’m pretty happy.”
So do you load the screen caps up to your account before you post them? There’s no short cut?
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
So do you load the screen caps up to your account before you post them?
Yes and no, but mostly yes. The SBN image apps all require that a pic be hosted somewhere with a URL. In comments posting and FanShot posting, I have to link directly to my photobucket account (cheap, fast, and free.)
In FanPost posting, and I presume in the Overlords’ Fortress of Solitude where JP and his myrmidons forge the posts for the main page (bending words and stats to their iron will), I still have to input the photobucket URL for the image but SBN uploads the image directly to its own servers and issues a new URL of ‘assets.sbnation.xxxxxxx’.
To make a long story short, SBN will not display an image that is only stored on your hard drive. It has to be hosted on the web somewhere.
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
Thanks
I’m going to go open a photobucket account now. See if I can’t bring some more to the Rink.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
photobucket is super easy to use. be sure to take advantage of being able to create various albums to organize stuff to find easily in the future.
Thanks for the tip. I’m working on it now. The night owls should have something to check out before they go to bed. Everyone else should have it in the morning.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
if it’s a picture you don’t ever intend on using again and want an easier time of uploading and all that I suggest using imageshack.us, which desn’t require an account, but you don’t have the album features and stuff.
Just another option if it’s not a picture you intend on using again. Better bandwidth than photobucket on average I think.
I will
I may have questions because this is pretty ambitious for me. You’ll be the first to know.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Here’s a possible work around – you guys can save FanPosts without posting them, right? You could create a FanPost and upload whatever image you want in that, preview it, and boom – there’s your URL. Just keep using the same FanPost and you don’t need a photobucket account, right?
Japers' Rink: Hockey blogging from the most powerful city in the world
I’ve been emailing the image to myself using gmail. That gives a nice web URL.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
whoa, really? i thought gmail URLs couldn’t be seen by anyone except the signed-in gmail user? warning to girlfriends everywhere sending naked pictures, i guess..
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
as an example: if someone signs into his/her gmail account from my computer, opens some picture attachments, then signs out….all those URLs are still in my browser history. but if i click on them, it takes me to the gmail login page, not to the pictures themselves. not the same thing?
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Oh, I just right-click the picture and hit “Copy Image Location” (Firefox). That gives me a good public URL. If you can see the following image (a wikipedia screenshot), then it works.
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
(i think you’ll be able to see it from your PC, though, because of the cache and/or because you’re still signed into gmail.)
by Natty Bumppo on Nov 29, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Huh. And here I thought I was on to something clever.
Never mind then. Gmail doesn’t work…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
But photobucket is ridiculously easy. So that’s good. The problem is going to be when I want to upload my own video. I think I’m going to have to set up a YouTube account.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Did you rectify your lack of DVR situation? My STB with DVR has been crucial – allows me to participate in the kids bed time rituals, then start 7:00p games around 7:45p to 8:00p, zip through commercials and intermissions, catch up with the game live usually during early third period.
Your commentary the other night during Alzner’s first game up, specifically on the nifty back hand pass from deep in the defensive end, got me thinking about extracting such stats-evading gems (and for that matter, anything) from the DVR. That part solved – I can now capture from the STB, live or from content stored to DVR, in HD or SD. Still tinkering with uploads to YouTube, but not impressed with the quality. #needsmoreresearch
"I play Russian roulette every day - a man's sport - with a bullet called life"
STB?
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Set Top Box … for my Fios service, the STB is a Motorola HD / DVR model QIP6416-2 which has a firewire port on the back.
"I play Russian roulette every day - a man's sport - with a bullet called life"
Awesome, got a couple technical and quality issues worked out. Now I can upload very good quality captures up to YouTube. Until you get your DVR, if there is some clip you want to illustrate points or whatever …
"I play Russian roulette every day - a man's sport - with a bullet called life"
Hell yeah. You’re going to rue the day you made that request. You have Center Ice?
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Oh snap. If you’re serious just check in with the OT Hockey thread when it’s back up and if I’m looking to get some film from a certain game I’ll ask you to DVR it. You definitely don’t have to but I’ll take up the offer if it stands.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I understand Fehr had Thanksgiving dinner with the Knubles. (At the beginning of the year, Fehr did want to learn from Knuble on net crashing and tip ins.)
Rocking the Red since 1975
Stecks was also invited to T-Day dinner at Chateau Knuble, but they put a net at the end of the driveway and, well…you can guess the rest.
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
by EmilyB on Nov 29, 2009 1:11 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
If Mike Knuble invites one to dinner, one procures a bottle of fine wine plus the latest Lady GaGa CD and arrives on time. It is the way of things.
/really, I have no idea
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
She was at the Bell Friday night…
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 29, 2009 1:46 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
By the way, a big kudos to you guys for a 1300+ comment GDT. Awesome stuff.
"I think the relentless negative coverage in The Washington Post is a real difference from previous years," Redskins general counsel David Donovan said. "But in terms of the way our actual fans are behaving, we don't see any difference."
Fool me once...
I got punk’d by Lisa Hillary. I changed the channel in disgust got called away from the teevee for urgent business elsewhere in the final three minutes of regulation. Checked in just as LH gave the wrong info, rolled my eyes, and changed the channel again.
Imagine my surprise when I decided to look at the Recap.
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
Hahaha Oh LH… I have the video on YouTube, i’ll fan shot it in a few seconds for those who care.
"And next year it will be ours."
FanShot is up A work of art. And yes, that was the exact moment I checked back (backchecked?) in on the game.
Mercy.
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
Amazing.
That is absolutely hysterical. That’s what you get for leaving!
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
I guess she saw the Caps lose in an alternate universe. She evidently did not watch the same game as the rest of us.
So we have parallel universes — one where the Caps won tonight and Eric Fehr scored the game winning goal. And another universe where Eric Fehr missed. LIsa H. must have observed the latter.
Rocking the Red since 1975
BIZARRO LISA HILLARY LOVE REAL LISA HILLARY!!
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions
I think we have a winner! That was a wow moment. We wondered if perhaps we had imagined the win for a brief moment.
The Caps fan doesn't say, 'is the glass half full' or 'is the glass half empty'. He wonders when the glass is going to spill.
Trade Mara?
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 29, 2009 5:07 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Nyet. He’s not exactly a defensive defenseman. Lots of assists. Pretty good amount of goals for a defenseman. A high minus in the plus/minus department most years. Plus he’s 30.
Rocking the Red since 1975
Snark-a-roni, the Verizon Center treat.
"Good luck and God speed, Ben. See you on the other side of the pitch."
by Bald Pollack on Nov 29, 2009 9:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
I thought this quote was from a Caps player for the half second before I remembered that the Caps won and the Habs were the ones with the late penalty.
by red army line on Nov 29, 2009 5:33 AM EST up reply actions
Quick check shows the Caps at #2 on offense, 18 on D, 2 at 5-on-5, 6 on the PP (what is CBJ doing in 1st???), 23 on the PK, and 6 in FO. So yeah, stay out of the box, boys.
by red army line on Nov 29, 2009 5:36 AM EST up reply actions
I’m rooting against them because they play the fucking trap. they’d be so much more interesting if they were turned loose.
by RedBirdie on Nov 29, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I rec’d this but their D has been atrocious this year and they are actually scoring more goals. I think a lot of that is on S. Mason regressing some. And I absolutely love seeing Hitchcock’s team having defensive woes.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
A couple of those D would look pretty good in red…
Atta dinnin stick a who!
by Gould Old Days on Nov 29, 2009 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
Indeed
Euros at that.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...
Anyone else notice that Ovi hasn’t once jumped into the glass after scoring since he got hurt?
SO FЯIENDS, IS BATTLE NOW.
Could be a coincidence…for example last night jumping into the glass would have been very out of the way for him.
I hadn’t thought about it until you mentioned it. But, given the 20/20 hindsight and the the comments that he probably wasn’t playing at 100% right away, it makes some sense. I’m sure we haven’t seen the end of that.
The Caps fan doesn't say, 'is the glass half full' or 'is the glass half empty'. He wonders when the glass is going to spill.
ive noticed he hasnt jumped into the glass since this beauty:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4_MKH1ldHI
I wouldnt tempt fate either…
I know I'm Late to this party but going back to your original recap thoughts
Somewhat further to that point, the Caps didn’t get a single shot on goal from a defenseman tonight. Not one.
I think that’s because the Caps continue to try to be too cute and look for the longer outlet passes instead of really changing how they bring the puck up and use the skating D-Man as he joins the “stunted” rush up the ice….
With 15.5 seconds left in the game and an offensive zone draw coming, Bruce Boudreau put his 45% faceoff guy out there instead of his 62% successful pivot. It worked, so it was the right move, right?
I think that so far this season Backstrom has shown that when he’s on his game he’s more than capable of winning a faceoff or 75% or so of them and he’s also shown himself to be as much or more of a setup man/premier pivot then anyone on the team. I love Steckel as much as anybody but if it’s not Bacstrom out there for that faceoff I would have sent out B-Mo and it didn’t seem to be his night last night….
Let’s talk Alexandre Giroux. With a chance to play on the top line with two of the game’s best players, he ends the night with two offensive zone penalties, a shot on goal and a helper. His decision-making and execution are just too slow for the speed of the game at the NHL level, and the sooner he’s back in Hershey, the better.
While last night certainly wasn’t his best effort and i wouldn’t keep AG in DC a minute longer then needed after Semin returns skating with OV and Backy can’t be the easiest thing to do and it’s got to take more than 36 hours to get used to playing with such talented guys. The two offensive zone penalties – yes rookie mistakes and beat him with a wet noodle but he did get a helper on a really nice goal and show he had the puck sense to understand what Backstrom and Ovechkin were putting together at that juncture of the game so I don’t think there’s any reason to give him the “bum’s ruch” out of town either.
by markbona-capsfan99 on Nov 29, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions
FAIL to me - when will I learn how to use the blockquote thing....
by markbona-capsfan99 on Nov 29, 2009 4:42 PM EST reply actions
I’m actually curious as to how you did what you did. As for Giroux, one minute longer is too long, regardless of Semin’s health. OO please.
If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...







































