Monday Roundup

After a game like Saturday's and with the revolving door to the injured reserve starting to smoke from spinning so fast, it's hard to get a handle on exactly how good the Washington Capitals are right now, but that doesn't stop us from trying.

In the past, I've used a pretty simple formula to rank teams (very roughly, I might add), and comparing that ranking to a list of teams ranked by points percentage, I feel you can get a decent handle on which teams are overachieving relative to their play and which teams are underachieving. What I mean by that is that a team that is exceptional five-on-five and good on both special teams should have a pretty good record. If not, they're underachieving. By the same token, a team that is lousy on special teams and bad five-on-five but somehow has managed a .500 record is overavchieving. In both cases, the likelihood of a regression to their expected points percentage would be likely, all else equal.

Jumping right into it, we'll ranks the 30 teams in five-on-five ratio, power play percentage and penalty kill percentage, add 'em up, and spit out a cumulative ranking (I think Peerless has used something similar in the past, but I'm not positive). That ranking after the jump.

Good, you made it. Here are those rankings I was talking about, through Saturday:

Rink_power_rankings_medium

Surprised to see the 'Canes that low? Me too. But how highly ranked can a team really be if they're ranked 20th or worst 5-on-5, on the PP and on the PK? In what facet of the game, pray tell, are they even average? Based upon their rankings in those three categories, they really have no business taking home more than half the points that have been available to them, and yet they have. Not surprisingly, they're near the top of the list, then, of teams which have overachieved (relative to their play) so far:

Over_under_medium

Heading into Sunday's action, the Minnesota Wild had the seventh-best power-play in the League, the second-best penalty kill and were bad five-on-five. The 'Canes were slightly better five-on-five than the Wild, but atrocious on the special teams, and yet Carolina, at 15-13-4 had one more point than Minny (16-14-2). Is there much question, however, which is the "better" team?

Granted, there are differences in strength of schedule, home/road splits, number of power play and penalty kill opportunities, etc., and 5-on-5 ratio should probably be weighted a little bit (since roughly two-thirds of all goals are scored at five aside), but it certainly seems as if certain teams are lucky to be where they are in the standings based on how they've played so far, and others probably deserve a better fate than they've thus far received.

As far as the Caps go, you've noticed that they're ranked ninth in these power rankings and were ninth in the League in points percentage. With all the adversity this team has faced, it's right where you'd expect it to be given how it has played in each facet of the game and on the whole - good, with plenty of room for improvement.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Japers' Rink

You must be a member of Japers' Rink to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Japers' Rink. You should read them.

Join Japers' Rink

You must be a member of Japers' Rink to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Japers' Rink. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker